Smoke Monitoring for Prescribed and Wildland Fires and Natural Events Action Plan(NEAP) Jim Russell Pacific Northwest Region USDA Forest Service 503.808.2956 [email protected]Interagency Smoke and Air Council Sacramento, California April 23-24 th , 2003
35
Embed
Smoke Monitoring for Prescribed and Wildland Fires and Natural Events Action Plan(NEAP) Jim Russell Pacific Northwest Region USDA Forest Service 503.808.2956.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Smoke Monitoringfor Prescribed and Wildland Fires and Natural Events Action Plan(NEAP)
1 from Idaho Department of Environmental Quality's Wildfire Natural Events Action Plan
Wildfire PM2.5 Compared to Other US Sources
National PM2.5 by Category
0
1,000,000
2,000,000
3,000,000
4,000,000
5,000,000
6,000,000
7,000,000
8,000,000
PM
2.5
to
ns/
yr
All electric
All Point
All Area
National
Low wildfire
High wildfire
Wildfire can emit as much PM2.5 in a day as a large point or area source does in a year
(estimates from a county in Washington)
PM2.5 Largest Point Source, Highest County Area Source Total, Single Bad Wildfire Day
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
PM
2.5
(to
ns)
Largest Point (t/yr)
Highest Area (t/yr)
Bad wildfire (t/day)
Objectives For Fire Use under the 10-Year Comprehensive Strategy
• Restoration of Fire-Adapted Ecosystems– Successful Outcome – Fire adapted ecosystems are restored,
rehabilitated and maintained, using appropriate tools, in a manner that will provide sustainable environmental, social, and economic benefits.
• Improve Fire Prevention and Suppression – Successful Outcome - Losses of life are eliminated, and firefighter and
damage to communities and the environment from severe, unplanned and unwanted wildland fire are reduced.
• Reduce Hazardous Fuels– Successful Outcome –Hazardous fuels are treated, using appropriate tools, to
reduce the risk of unplanned and unwanted wildland fire to communities and to the environment
• Promote Community Assistance– Successful Outcome – Communities at risk have increased capacity to prevent
losses from wildland fire and the potential to seek economic opportunities resulting from treatments and services.
Smoke Management Plans as Effective Mitigation
• Prevent fire use smoke from entering and accumulating in designated and smoke sensitive areas. (Question: How do we quantify impacts - nuisance, visibility reduction, and NAAQS Violation under the SMP)
• Emphasize Emission Reduction
• Maximize Burning Opportunities
• Protect Public Health
How do we assure that the Role of Fire in our Fire Dependent Ecosystems is Recognized in
our SMP
• Concept of Managing Total Fire Emissions – Prescribed fire vs. wildfire overtime.– The Goal is the long term reduction of
wildfire emissions.
Approaches to Meeting the Goal of Supporting our SMP’s
• Federal Reference Method (e.g., Hi Vol)• Short term (1 hour)• Daily average (PM10 or PM2.5 Standard)• Annual average (PM10 or PM2.5 Standard)• Speciated (e.g, for toxics, for visibility
(IMPROVE), etc)
Who Should Be Communicating Smoke Concentrations to the Public and
Their Effects on Human Health and Safety ?
• State & Local Health Departments ? YES
• Federal Land Managers ? NO
• Private Burners ? NO
• US EPA ? ?
Radiance Research Nephelometer Model
M903
Optec NGN-3 PM2.5 Nephelometer
Met-One Instruments GT-640 Nephelometer
Anderson RTAA 800 Aethalometer
BGI PQ200 PM2.5 FRM Gravimetric
Real-time Smoke Monitors Evaluated for USDA Forest
Example of Existing Monitoring Network For Monitoring
Wildland and Prescribed Fire Smoke
•PNW Smoke Monitoring Network (FS/BLM,WA/OR)
•USDA Forest Service DataRam Cache
Definition of Monitoring • To watch, observe, or check for a special
purpose………………….
• To keep track of…………
• One that warns………….
• A device for observing a biological condition or function or change…….
• A heavily armed warship appointed to assist a teacher………………….
FS &BLM Sponsored Nephelometer Sites
**
*
**
*
**
**
*
*
FS & BLM Sponsored Nephelometer Locations
FS Planned Locations
*
*
**
Smoke Monitoring Contract Conditions
• Forest Service Agrees To: 1. Provide physical site to locate monitoring equipment,
including temperature controlled shelter, AC power, and telephone service for data retrieval.
2. Provide site operator(s) that will be available, during and after monitoring equipment installation, for instruction and initial operation training. Time commitment for this phase is approximately 1 day per site per operator.
• 3. Manage the day-to-day operation following Ecology’ Air Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan and Procedures.
Smoke Monitoring Contract Conditions
• State Agrees to: 1. Test, calibrate, and configure equipment at Ecology’s HQ facility.2. Assist in the installation of equipment at various monitoring
locations. 3. Train Forest Service operator(s) annually at Ecology’s HQ facility.4. Technical support for each site5. Routine editing and archiving of the data.6. Provide Forest Service with web site information and training. 7. Technical assistance with data retrieval problems associated
with Ecology equipment
Washington State Air Monitoring Network
Particulates
Ozone
Carbon Monoxide
Sulfur Dioxide
Nitrogen Dioxide
Washington State Air Monitoring Network
Particulates
Ozone
Carbon Monoxide
Sulfur Dioxide
Nitrogen Dioxide
FS Particulates
2002 SW Oregon Wildfires - Air Quality Effects
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
8008/
1
8/2
8/3
8/4
8/5
8/6
8/7
8/8
8/9
8/10
8/11
8/12
8/13
8/14
8/15
8/16
8/17
8/18
8/19
8/20
8/21
8/22
8/23
8/24
8/25
8/26
8/27
8/28
8/29
8/30
8/31 9/
1
9/2
9/3
Bsc
at c
on
vert
ed t
o P
M2.
5 (u
g/m
3)
Crater Lake
Klamath Falls
Lakeview
Provolt
Medford
Illinois Valley
Shady Cove
Grants Pass
Ruch Fire Station
PM2.5 From SW Oregon Wildfires - 2002Measured by DataRAM nephelometers
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
PM2.
5 (u
g/m
3)
Brookings 24hr
Gold Beach 24hr
Brookings 1hr
Gold Beach 1hr
Key Conclusions
• The need for Smoke Monitoring is significant for both Wildland Fire and Fire Use Activities.
• It is not simply the responsibility of the State and County Air Regulators to monitor Smoke Impacts generated from Fire Use Activities on Federal Land.
• Cooperation and Collaboration are essential if we are to meet the goal of reducing total smoke emission over time within our Fire Dependent Ecosystems.
Key Conclusion (Continued)
• There needs to be an emphasis in smoke monitoring at the geographic area and interstate level based on the planned increase in prescribed burning being proposed by federal and state land managers.
• The increase in the frequency and intensity of wildland fires and the subsequent effect on public and firefighter health must be acknowledge and dealt with by those suppressing the fire and those trying to protect public health adjacent to the wildfire.
• State Monitors target population centers and not rural areas that federal burning may impact in the future.
• We need to be a good neighbor with our private land neighbors.
Other Conclusion and Question?
• Reference www.satguard.com/usfs for DataRams website referenced in this presentation.