SGIP eMeeting 12 December 2013 1:00 – 2:00pm ET
Jun 08, 2015
SGIP eMeeting
12 December 2013
1:00 – 2:00pm ET
Host
Patrick J. GannonPresident and Executive Director,
SGIP
Agenda
• Opening Remarks John McDonald• Smart Grid Implementation Don Von DollenMethods Committee
• Inaugural Conference Blaine Kohl• 2014 Initiatives Patrick Gannon• Q & A
Opening Remarks
John D. McDonald, P.E.Chairman of the Board, SGIP
Director, Tech. Strategy & Policy Dev.GE Digital Energy
• Board of Directors Announcement
• 2013 Member Engagement
• 2014 Highlights
Chairman’s Message
Smart Grid Interoperability Panel
orchestrates the work behind power grid modernization
2014 Board Directors ‐ IncomingDirector Category
Richard Kornfeld,Grid2Home Inc.
03: Consumers – Residential, Commercial & Industrial
Tony Thomas, NRECA 07: Electric Utility Companies ‐ Rural Electric Association
Mark Klerer, Qualcomm 11: IT Application Developers and Integrators
Chris Greer, NIST 15: Relevant Federal Government Agencies
Nick Wagner, NARUC 19: State & Local Regulators
Ed Eckert, Itron At large
Erich W. Gunther, Enernex At large
Vicky Pilletteri, NIST Ex Officio, Smart Grid Cybersecurity Committee Chair
Don von Dollen, EPRI Ex Officio, Smart Grid Implementation Methods Committee Chair
Dean Prochaska, NIST Ex Officio, Smart Grid Testing & Certification Committee Chair
Board Directors ‐ ContinuingDirector Category
Tariq Samad, Honeywell 02: Commercial & Industrial Equipment Manufacturers & Automation Vendors
Doug McGinnis, Exelon 05: Electric Utility Companies – Investor Owned Utilities & Publicly Owned Utilities & Federal/State Power Authorities
Suresh Kotha, SMUD 06: Electric Utility Companies – Municipal Owned Utilities
Dave Hardin, EnerNOC 08: Electricity and Financial Market Traders
Thomas Herbst, Silver Spring Networks
10: Information & Communication Technologies Infrastructure and Service Providers
Robby Simpson, GE Digital Energy
12: Power Equipment Manufacturers & Vendors
Barry Haaser,Lakeview Group
13: Professional Societies, User’s Groups, Trade Associations & Industry Consortia
Steve Widergren, PNNL 14: R&D Organizations and Academia
John Nunneley, SunSpec Alliance
16: Renewable Power Producers
Board Directors ‐ ContinuingDirector Category
Mark Smith,Reliant Energy
17: Retail Service Providers
John Caskey, NEMA 18: Standards & Specification Development Organizations
Rik Drummond, DGI 20: Testing and Certification Vendors
David Forfia, ERCOT 21: Transmission Operators & Independent System Operators
Scott Ungerer, Enertech Capital
22: Venture Capital
John McDonald,GE Digital Energy
At large
Patrick Gannon, SGIP Ex Officio, Executive Director
Chris Irwin, DOE Ex Officio, DOE Representative
George Arnold, NIST Ex Officio, NIST Representative
Ron Ambrosio, IBM Ex Officio, Smart Grid Architecture Committee Chair
Thank you to Departing Directors
• Brian Markwalter• Mike Coop• Bob Saint• Bill Lawrence
• Brent Hodges• Lisa Kaiser• Bill Cloutier• Christine Wright
• Accelerate the realization of interoperability benefits from harmonized standards and faster integration of interoperable technologies
• Facilitate the core technical work by providing thought leadership, a productive collaborative workspace and management process
• Help stakeholders Navigate among the Smart Grid Ecosystem processes and relationships
• Communicate with all Smart Grid Ecosystem stakeholders on standards information and benefits from interoperability
Strategic Goals
• SGIP is the only entity where the entire splintered Smart Grid ecosystem comes together– SGIP has the opportunity to be a “strategic organization” in the foundation of the Smart Grid
• SGIP is a unique influential organization working with businesses, policy makers and regulators
• SGIP needs to be more focused on policy, regulation, and business cases for implementation
• Provide visibility of SGIP in policy, regulation, and business areas
Member Engagement Feedback #1
• Help us stay abreast in the Smart Grid market– How does this standard impact the market? When? – What influences the regulatory push? – What’s going to make the standards impactful in the market and to our customers?
– How can we get more business people involved• Provide a “Timetable” of how the standards impact our company – customer demand, regulator mandate, utility needs
• We need the big picture view of interoperability in the Smart Grid to grow the businesses and markets
Member Engagement Feedback #2
• Smart Grid Cybersecurity Committee (SGCC)– Collaborate with DOE, FERC, DHS, DoD and NIST to develop a NIST Smart Grid Supply Chain Awareness Guide
• Smart Grid Testing and Certification Committee (SGTCC)– Build a directory of all industry test programs relative to Smart Grid standards
• Smart Grid Architecture Committee (SGAC)– Launched Transactive Energy working party (Business to Grid DEWG) ‐ near completion on its TransactiveEnergy Retail Applications white paper
2014 Highlights #1
• Distributed Renewables, Generation and Storage DEWG (DRGS DEWG)– Releasing Distributed Energy Resources (DER): hierarchical classification of use cases and the process for developing information exchange requirements and object models
• Home to Grid (H2G) DEWG ongoing projects to include focus on communications between utilities and home devices
• Business to Grid (B2G) and Industry to Grid (I2G) DEWGs to launch Priority Action Plan (PAP) on Transactive Energy
2014 Highlights #2
• Interoperability Implementation Experiences (IIE)– List of implemented Smart Grid applications– Identifying key standards implemented
• Interoperability Mapping Tool (IMT)– Port, customize and operate an interactive, online tool– Include SGIP’s CoS, plus work of the DEWGs and PAPs
• Business Impact of Standards Analysis Services– Develop and apply a methodology to assess business impact
– Calculate benefits and costs of interoperability experiences• Educational & Informational Services
– Based on the results derived from IIE and IMT programs– Identify the most relevant “vectors of influence”
SGIP Special Projects & Deliverables
“How the Smart Grid
Interoperability Panel
Supports Electric Utilities,
Regulators, Manufacturers
and Integrators in 2014 to
Ensure Electric Grid
Reliability”
Guest Speaker
Don Von DollenSGIMC Chair
EPRI, Sr Program Manager, Data Integration & Communications
Don Von [email protected]
Interoperability in Practice◦ Implementation of standards Lessons learned and best practices Business case Barriers and challenges
◦ Implementer Community Forum for implementers to share experiences
◦ Feedback loop Pass along issues to DEWGS, Technical Committee, SDOs, User’s Groups and Alliances
Interoperability Implementation Experiences (IIE) Project
Standards Mapping Tool
Develop a series of case studies on the implementation of standards◦ Focus on Catalog of Standards entries◦ Engage the implementers Utilities, RTO / ISO, suppliers, consultants, service providers, alliances, etc.
Value to Members◦ Pass along lessons learned to other companies that might be interested in implementing a standard
◦ Go into an implementation with a solid understanding of what to expect
Motivation / Business Case Technology Availability / Maturity Integration with the Existing Infrastructure Impact on the Organization Third Party Impacts Reliability and Security Impacts Implementation Experience Operation Experience Recommendations for Follow‐on Work
For each case study:◦ A webcast presentation by the implementer Recorded and posted on SGIP website◦ A concise paper Posted on SGIP website◦ Both will follow the template
Would like to do 6‐8 case studies in 2014 Follow up Activities◦ Consider forming a working group of implementers of the standard to align on gaps and recommendations◦ Could lead to the creation of a PAP
1. Integration of distributed generation2. IEC 618503. CIM (IEC 61970 / 61968)4. Demand response (Open ADR)5. Electric transportation6. Green Button7. Smart Energy Profile 2.08. AMI9. Distribution automation10. Synchrophasors (PMU)11. Transactive energy
Cautions◦ Want to remain neutral on specific vendors and consultants
◦ The cases studies will be most effective if the implementers are open and candid about their experience
Underway◦ Developing a case study template
◦ Developing the first case study – quickly Refine the process and the output DTE Energy implementation of CIM at the Enterprise Service Bus
Next Steps◦ Create the case study pipeline Identify implementers that want to help develop a case study
Contractor to conduct interviews to develop the case study document and help with the presentation
Interactive Software Platform ◦ Represents the entire smart grid value chain with a set of interconnected nodes
◦ Each node is a “layered” data base with a pull‐down menu having existing standards pop‐up at smart grid nodes, along with access to selected "use cases“
Plan is to “tailor” the tool for the IMC by expanding the “layered” nodal data base to include:◦ SGIP Catalog of Standards (CoS) items
◦ Implementation “case studies” to be produced by the IMC's IIE project in the form of standardized IMC templates
◦ The work of the DEWGs and PAPs at relevant nodes
◦ We expect that the IMC will identify other SGIP‐related applications that the mapping tool can support, e.g., document management
Value to Members◦ Provides easier access to SGIP information
◦ Puts the information into the context of the power grid
◦ Identifies relationships between standards
Welcome, meeting purpose and approach Don Von Dollen
PRESENTATION: Reducing the Distance to Integrate: Kelly Flowers, CIM at the Enterprise Service Bus DTE Energy
Discussion on Interoperability Implementation Don Von DollenExperience (IIE) Case Study Template Erich Gunther
Review of IIE Case Study Pipeline Don Von Dollen
Update on Standards Mapping Tool Dom Geraghty
IMC Meeting Calendar for 2014 Don Von Dollen
Don Von [email protected]
Inaugural Conference Recap
Blaine KohlDirector Marketing & Membership
SGIP
Palm Beach Gardens, Florida
More details at http://sgip.org/sgip-inaugural-conference-2/30 Second Video Recap
Hot Topics• Microgrids• Transactive Energy• Cybersecurity• Advanced Metering Infrastructure andOutage Management Systems
• Business perspectives
• Utility perspectives for building resiliency
• Manufacturer perspectives • Sensors, data and Internet of Things
• International perspectives• Green button
Stakeholder Networking
John NorrisFERC
Leocadia ZakUSTDA
Thomas Gross Eaton
Lisa Polak Edgar NARUC
Philip Q HanserThe Brattle Group
Hiroshi KuniyoshiNEDO; JSCA
Hank KenchingtonDepartment of Energy
2014
2 Members’ Only Meetings1 Combo Members’ Meeting + Conference
Details coming soon
SGIPStrategic Services
Patrick J. Gannon
• Business Impact of Standards Analysis Services– Develop and apply a methodology to assess business impact
– Calculate benefits and costs of interoperability experiences– Map the benefits to utility operational functions
• Educational & Informational Services– Based on the results derived from IIE and IMT programs– Assist Members in preparing specific benefits roadmaps– Identify the most relevant “vectors of influence”– Produce reports that help members in project planning and product deployment based on standards for interoperability
SGIP Special Projects & Deliverables
• Vector: a measurement that has magnitude and direction
• Influence: the power to cause changes without directly forcing them to happen
• SGIP Vectors of Influence:– Identifies the size or extent of the impact of a given standard
– Determines the factors that influence the timing and direction of a given standard
– Identifies any barriers to implementation and what business functions could be impacted by the standard
Defining Vectors of Influence
What is the size and extent of the impacts of a standard on business operations?
Who & what are the key drivers?
What is the direction and timing of the standard for
implementation?
What are the potential barriers to implement
the standard?
What is impacted by the standard?
SGIP Vectors of Influence
• Complete several Interoperability Implementation Experience reports
• Begin adding SGIP Layers to the Interoperability Mapping Tool
• Write Vectors of Influence reports – Based on SGIP Catalog of Standards entries
• Develop Educational and Informational Services– Select several SGIP Members for pilot project to begin developing specific benefits roadmaps
– Produce example reports and get Member feedback on how they can be used in project planning and deployment
SGIP 2014 Special Projects Plan
Question & Answers