Slug Test Results · SLUG TEST ANALYSIS Rising Head Test #1 Monitor Well LD-1 Well Specifications Total well depth: Depth to water: Screen length (Le): Aquifer thickness:

APPENDIX G

Slug Test Results

AR303323

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS

Rising Head Test #1Monitor Well LD-1

Well Specifications

Total well depth:Depth to water:Screen length (Le):Aquifer thickness:

Rc=

From type curve:Where Le/rw=

50.4211101000.22

30ln(Re/rw) =

feet Well diameter: 4 inchesfeet Borehole diameter: 8 inchesfeet Sat. thickness (Lw): 39.42 feetfeet Sandpack porosity:feet rw= 0.3333 feet

L

A= 2.52.6098 B= 0.4

Results

Regression line: r squared

Hydraulic conductivity =

Bouwer and Rice Method0.9941

41 .08 ft/day

Effective radial distancek ofslug test = 4.5 feet

Graphical Results

10

I

^^ 1

•a03

X

toa{-) o.oi

0.001

^

i . • > . • •

^ ^°iB ,

^ 1

r-.

0

B data

' ."B\«

"

'

^Time (min)

points regression

'

t

E

1.5

line

T3 0CO >0) >

crc c . i i i i

]i

• •• • •<

cs

(133d) QV3H NI 3ONVHD

AR303325

oo

C/tusi i- i I • ' ^* T i i•*-• -L • «

Q i ' Svo v—'ttis.

OQcoeu

tu

SLUG TEST ANALYSISRising Head Test #2Monitor Well LD-1


Rc=


Well

50.42 feet11 feet10 feet100 feet0.22 feet

30ln(Re/rw) =

Specifications

Well diameter:Borehole diameter:Sat. thickness (Lw):Sandpack porosity:

rw=

A=2.6098 B=

4 inches8 inches

39.42 feet

0.3333 feet

2.50.4

ResultsBouwer and Rice Method

Regression line: r squared = 0.9991

Hydraulic conductivity = 40.54 ft/day

Effective radial distance^ of slug test = __ 4.5 feet

Graphical Results

T303<UX

QOCra5 0.0,

0.0010.2 0.4 —,0.6 , . . 0.8 1Time (mm)

B data points _ regression line

CM

05 Q

r- i!•O 0CC >0

C C'05 °E s

•O O4 V~) ^ ly o 1O<N i-J O C3

I

(1333) QV3H MI 3OMVHD

AR3Q3327

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS

Falling Head Test #1Monitor Well LD-1


Rc=


Well

50.42 feet11 feet10 feet100 feet0.22 feet

30!n(Re/rw) =

Specifications


rw=

A=2.6098 B =

i

4 inches8 inches

39.42 feet

0.3333 feet

2.50.4

Results



Effective radial distance^ of slug test =


37.48 ft/day

4.5 feet

" ^ Graphical Results

10

cr ' '-a,03<UXc ®'^

c03

U 0.0,'

0.001 c

1 — ————————————————

-

,

.

-<=.

^

0.5 .'.- „.Time (mB data ooints

"gr^

^ B

x 1.5 2n)regression line

AR303328

-"fli T—

"05£3"O ~CO -0 >zn k.CO 4-*

.E c= oCO LL

L/

C

— m- ———

\\i

————— i

i

————— i

i

~! CD

-

1

1 —————————

1

| —————————

1

\

5 •/C

1 ————————— I~> -31

1 ——— ••"- i/

-

•-ffc * __

•) r—4

'

•»s) U1 r

1 0s)

<

/—rjjHDZ,2

1H|Q00OH

-0T

(1333) QV3H NI 3OMVHD

flR303329

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS

Falling Head Test #2Monitor Well LD-1

Well Specifications


Rc=


50.4211101000.22

30ln(Re/rw)=

feet Well diameter:feet Borehole diameter:feet Sat. thickness (Lw):feet Sandpack porosity:feet rw=

A=2.6098 B =

4 inches8 inches

39.42 feet

0.3333 feet

2.50.4

Results



Effective radial distance^^ of slug test =


52.71 ft/day

4.5 feet

Graphical Results

10

t?•a '03DXc<uGO03 0.1

6,

0.01c

«•• v%s . ' •B

ffi

&

rs_>B

^\ ^ E

^ "S.•x.\

B^\

B^--,

B "\. ""fe-^

\l

0.2 0.4 . ,_. , 0.6. . 0.8 1 1.2Time (mm)B data points _ regression line

VAJSi*ffl T~

W Q|2 —iIMM

«i0 >i i-o2.E c= 0CO LL •*

uC

\——————— 1

1

———————

——————— 1- c3

, ———

1

\•\

5 >/c

•-J3

^ "»»

^ —————— •

-> V-

•*•-•-•

1 r•4

^ wr

•IMT

1 r^

-

-

=•=— •

0 ur

— vj

1

oo"UJHDfe— •

csSV N ^_|

aSQCO<jW

o-,01

(1333) QV3H MI 3ONVH3

SR30333I

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS

Rising Head Test #1Monitor Well LS-8

Well Specifications


Rc=


59.86 feet8.88 feet10 feet100 feet0.1 4 feet

40ln(Re/rw)=


rw=

A=2.9964 B =

2 inches6 inches

50.98 feet

0.2500 feet

2.70.45




Effective radial distanceof slug test =__________5.0 feetw

Graphical Results:

10

I

+—><4—

T303<UX

.E "-1uMna5 0.0,

0.00 1

\ - -H, "

\ •'• 'B

<\\'\ B\ B E

A i\

' \\

- .

-

>E3E B i :

0.2 OA „. . 0.6. . 0 . 8 1 1Time (mm)B data points _ _ regression line

t

SR303332

=& °o+- I% toO -J

•o "0CO0

c c't/3£w £

(1333) QV3H NI 3ONVHD

ftR303333

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS

Rising Head Test # 2Monitor Well LS-8


Rc=


Well

59.86 feet8.88 feet10 feet

100 feet0.1 4 feet

40: ln(Re/rw) =

Specifications


rw=

A=2.9964 B =

12 inches6 inches

50.98 feet

0.2500 feet

2.70.45

Results '



Effective radial distancefl^ of slug test =


108.38 ft/day

5.0 feet

Graphical Results

10

•o03OJX.E °''0)

c03J5U 0.0, '

0.001(

\a*

\B\ E3

\ .\B

\teHEE

D S \ B E !

\; B E E E ;

'

) OJ

B data

: E t

S B B B•

: B t

E E*'. B B

r^. f 1.5. N. :Time (mm)points regression

1

I E

2.5-

line

•; CO

in CN in T-i inr4 ^ o


CN

————.———.- i (VJ

c/TCM UJ

HDZ(/) C/D

h- dT3 0S5o| gC C || Q*

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS

Falling Head Test # 1Monitor Well LS-8


Rc=


59.868.88101000.14

40ln(Re/rw) =

Well Specifications


A= 2.72.9964 B= 0.45

Results

Regression line: r squared1




120.90 ft/day

5.0 feet

Graphical Results

10

s~*** \<£\ / 1

•a03<uXC O'1

<uBOC03

U 0.0,

0.001(

•

[<$i '3 I

\

TE

\ B\3Enc E\\ i\\

E :

E a BEE

9 E B

BS B !

E E E S E (

!

; t]

'i

) 0.5 1 _1.5 . . 2 2.5 3 3,5Time (mm)B data points _ regression line

303336

in

4— 'W C7D0 -JI- =T3 0CO g0 *= oen

COLL

*


AR303337

inCN

00UJH2i—istQ

oo(X

ino

in o >n - in (N ino o I —3 I (N

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS



Rc=


Well


100 feet0.1 4 feet

40ln(Re/rw) =

Specifications


rw=

A=2.9964 B =

2 inches6 inches

50.98 feet

0.2500 feet

2.70.45

Results



Effective radial distance| of slug test =


120.59 ft/day

5.0 feet

Graphical Results

10

T3CO

Xc "•'(Uc03

U „.„,'

0.001

i

V-\BB\EHBE

E B ' B H 1

,\\

: B B B B {

E

i B 1

B E B E

: " E i

E E HE

3

[

) . " <U 1 _. , 1JS. . 2 2JTime (mm)E data

^pointsi regression line

SR303338

(1333) QV3H NI 3ONVH3

0R303339

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS


Well Specifications


Rc=


83.02 feet10.83 feet

10 feet100 feet0.1 3 feet

40ln(Re/rw)=


rw=

A=3.1780 B=

2 inches6 inches

72. 19 feet

0.2500 feet

2.70.45


Ronroccinn lino- rcnnarori - (~l QRRA


Effective radial distance____of slug test =__________6.0 feet

Graphical Results

10

s-~ 1sT3034JX

.B "•'uM

1 'U 0.0,

0.001(

-

^ . _ .

\B

B

\

\

\N

EE B

\

\

Q

—————————

> 0,1 , « . . . . 0.3 0.4 OJ: Time (mm)H data points __ regression line

«eg0 -1h" zz-n ^*$

.E o

_ COI

OLHHJ) OVHH NI HONVHO

MINUTE

t. hQW£

,Ji

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS



Rc=


Well

83.02 feet10.83 feet

10 feet100 feet0.14 feet

40ln(Re/rw) =

Specifications


rw=

A=3.1780 B =

2 inches6 inches

72. 19 feet

0.2500 feet

2.70.45

Results



Effective radial distance^^^ of slug test =


287.27 ft/day

6.0 feet

Graphical Results

10

c

•aCO

X

VbOCO.C^ 0.01

0.001

ie

1-E

P E%1 • ,i1i

: E I

B B E B

,

BE 13 I

.

B B E E B

) - 0 . 5 „ ! . . . . 1.5 2 2.5Time (mm)B data points _ regression line

CM

0

"O0 __X O

.E 5to 2£

(1333) QV3H MI 3ONVHD

o>

0 w<H -J•o —,CO0I wD) S.E c= oCO LL

I


RR3Q33U14

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS

' Falling Head Test # 2Monitor Well LS-9

Well Specifications j


Rc=


83.0210.83

101000.14

40ln(Re/rw) =

feet Well diameter: 2 inchesfeet Borehole diameter: 6 inchesfeet Sat. thickness (Lw): 72. 19 feetfeet Sandpack porosity: ifeet rw= 0.2500 feet

A= 2.73.1780 B= 0.45

Results




793.91 ft/day

Effective radial distanceof slug test = 6.0 feet _,

Graphical Results j

10

s•oCOUXn 0.1"~DtocCO

5 0.0,

0.001

11

1,E

"\1

5

)

Aa f ta if

i

i

" E B B & B '

0.5

B data

c E B E s B (3 El B E E E !

T-- / 1J' NTime (mm)points regression

, Ic

iS

line

J

in o ino - d I ~

I I


flR3033l*6

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS







Rc=


Well


40ln(Re/rw) =

Specifications


rw=

A=2.9989 B=

2 inches6 inches

51 .27 feet

0.2500 feet

2.70.45

Graphical Results

10 ——

1

-oCO

X

OJto! C

CO

^ 0.01

%ii11

'

E

CEH 1

———— B ———— 1

1 S C

11

: E 3

1

,

i

0.5 1 1.5 . 2 2.5 3 3.5Time (mm)B data points _ regression line

W CO

* d

o>±r.E c I£ 5

*ID

0


AR3033i*8

I

h-r fl

CM

GO

H

WCOCL,

in

m i n c N i n ^ ^ i o o > nCN T-I o O

I

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS



Rc=


Well


100 feet0.1 4 feet

40ln(Re/rw)=

Specifications


rw=

A=2.9989 B=

2 inches6 inches

51 .27 feet

0.2500 feet

2.70.45

Results



Effective radial distanceof slug test =


186.30 ft/day

5.0 feet

Graphical Results

,0

•(-*_ (

•oC3<UX.E "•'<ubOcd

U 0.0,

0.001

1

\\r1 BE

1 BS

1

&

B 11 B B B B B E 1

) 0.5 , _U ... 2 2.5 3 3.5Time (mm)0 data points _ regression line

<n CO* =•o 0CO >0 >oo)±;c c

CN —• O

(1333) QV3H MI 3ONVH3

3R3D335Q

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS



Rc=


Well


40ln(Re/rw) =

Specifications


rw=

A=2.9989 B=

2 inches6 inches •

5 1.27 feet

0.2500 feet

2.70.45

Results





206.08 ft/day

5.0 feet

Graphical Results

10

g "•aCO<uX.E "IDU)CCO

5 0.0,

0.001(

i?1 —•r*\-K1 SB B\ BB I

\ '

iB H S

i m a

: EB a

m E i

BtS E B I

9 B: t: i

) 0.5 1 1.1 ... 2 2S 3 3JTime (mm)B data points _ regression line

AR30335I

QV3H NI HONVHD

1R303352


AR3Q3353

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS



Rc=


Well


40ln(Re/rw) =

Specifications


rw=

A=3.2696 B =

2 inches6 inches

8 1.66 feet

0.2500 feet

2.70.45

Resultsi Bouwer and Rice Method



Effective radial distance| of slug test = 6.6 feet

Graphical Results

10

1 1

£T•a8 OJXc<uGO 0.01CCOJZU

0.001

0.00010

;3

!1

» •B

EB

!: E E S 1

TiB data points

:

i , . . !me (mm)regro

P ————— 1

2.5 . 3 Jj.

ession line

in

*" CO• "*~H— ' 'C/5 C/3

H d•O 0CO >

T -0) -c E'eo °£ 5

—————

•— — — •-—— =1 —

————— i

————— i

—————i

4

i— • ——— •'

1... __...

i ——————

i\

i

L-_

mCN

ootuHD2s•> — 'a —

10 £—<"Qw

COCu<i_tQ

ino

04 —

(1333) QV3H NI 3OMVHD

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS



Rc=


Well


40ln(Re/rw)=

Specifications


rw=

A=3.2696 B =

2 inches6 inches

81.66 feet

0.2500 feet

2.70.45





Graphical Results

10

:

l

sTDS o-1X

<uGO 0.01C

JS •u0.001

0.0001(

^

\ _VE E

1 *1 B t

i

r1

: EH

B E B I

B E

5 K B E l

R r1 B E E

,

) OJS 1 1.5. . 2 2J 3Time (mm)B data points _ regression line

AR3G3356

CM w

"5 C/D0 JT3 "0CO >0 >T" *—-1- oC CW 0E s

_• ——— ==

———— •

i

———— ii

———— i

———— ii^*r

t

1 CN

W' : W

1 2' m^

: >' : CO

• — i »UJ

1)— •— - •-*,

m


SR303357

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS



Rc=


Well


40ln(Re/rw) =

Specifications


rw=

A=3.2696 B=

2 inches6 inches

8 1.66 feet

0.2500 feet

2.70.45

Results



Effective radial distancettk of slug test =


342.85 ft/day

6.6 feet

Graphical Results

10

1

sT3S »•>X_C

t>e>o o.oi

1U

0.00,

0.0001(

m.

!*afe -r] ———* i

E

a

eac E BEE ;

B

B

I E E E E

1

Time (mm)data points regression line

e3

4

4*303358

T—

^ T—

CO ff\0 1r—•Q -£CO •>0 >in u.O> 4->

.E cn: OCO 5LL

uC

———————— 1

1

————————

j0 C3

1

1 —————————

1

11 —————————

1

— ™

3 uC'•j '•D1

^— u1

———————— 1n r"•

1

idfc»=l- ly1 r

l-= — 1

1 r^1

x-

PJHD2^v .d3HQPJCOPuJud

oo

(1333) QV3H MI 3ONVHD

AR303359

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS

Failing Head Test # 2Monitor Well LS-13

Well Specifications

Total well depth: 89.75 feet Well diameter: 2 inchesDepth to water: 8.09 feet Borehole diameter: 6 inchesScreen length (Le): 10 feet Sat. thickness (Lw): 81.66 feetAquifer thickness: 100 feet Sandpack porosity:

Rc= 0.14 feet rw= 0.2500 feet

From type curve:Where Le/rw= 40 A= 2.7

ln(Re/rw)= 3.2696 ___ B= 0.45





Graphical Results

10

1

1

s"Og °-'X_c<uso o.oieCO

U0.001

0.0001c

*-

r~i&

E

& E E

ta i E E E E E 1S B E l 1;

1

'

0.5 1 _1.S , . . 2 2.5 3 1.5-- Time (mm)B data points _ regression line

CO

<fl ,n£ 33^0X w-O) -t—.E c= o

(1333) QV3H MI 39NVH3

flR30336.l

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS


Well Specifications


Rc=


70 feet13.9 feet10 feet

100 feet0.14 feet

40ln(Re/rw) =


rw=

A=3.0410 B=

————————————————

2 inches6 inches

56.1 feet -

0.2500 feet

2.70.45




Effective radial distancefl of slug test = 5.2 feet

Graphical Results

10

r+->

T3aajXc t'Z25

•0.01

-,!

————— —

^^ -~ ~-jj j

E

,

) 0.05 0.1 _0.15 ... 0.2 - 0.25 0.3 0,35Time (mm)a data points _ regression line

QR303362

(1333) QV3H KI 3ONVH3

flR303363

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS


Well Specifications


Rc=


70 feet13.9 feet10 feet100 feet0.1 4 feet

40ln(Re/rw)=


rw=

A=3.0410 B=

2 inches6 inches

56.1 feet

0.2500 feet

2.70.45




Effective radial distance____of slug test = ________5.2 feet

Graphical Results

10

1

, — v 1 r

;

*-

' ubO

10.01

0.0010.1 n-CLlS , . . 0.2 0.25 OJ OJSTime (mm)data points _ regression line

flR30336tf

in

£ w* =•D 0CO01 O0)±ic c

|O i i i i i : i i PJ

«-»

-»•-


SR303365

i ^

zH-<

S

PJ

CO

m o m

SLUG TEST ANALYSISFalling Head Test #1Monitor Well LS-15

Well Specifications


Rc=



100 feet0.1 4 feet

40ln(Re/rw) =


rw=

A=3.0410 B=

2 inches6 inches

56.1 feet

0.2500 feet

2.70.45




Effective radial distance____of slug test =__________5.2 feet___

Graphical Results

10

gT3 '03

=cUtooC03 O.I

u1

0.01(

9$

\•?

1B B

B E E I

\

i B B B E tE

: E H E E 1E

: E i;

) ,. OJ 1 _1J , . . 2 2.5 3 3JTime (mm)5, data points _ regression line

AR303366

in i—i in CN in m ino I — I CN I rn

I I I I


flR303367

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS

Falling Head Test #2Monitor Well LS-15

Well Specifications


Rc=

From type curve:Where Le/rw= '


40ln(Re/rw) =


rw=

A=3.0410 B=

2 inches6 inches

56.1 feet

0.2500 feet

2.70.45




Effective radial distance___of slug test = 5.2 feet

Graphical Results

10

X N 1•*_>U—

•o031)X.E '-1«j£P 'oa^ 0.01

0.001(

»=%£

\R

\! B « E E E B\\\

\\\

\\

: B B E S B !' B E E E B '

———————

1 fa ,3

OJ ' . 1 -,1.5 ... 2 2J J - 3JTime (mm)B data points _ regression line

flR303368

in

CMs, LO>R i~

0 h- -1~° "00 §I i-o S.E c= oCO LL

•

HI

i

y

i ————

i ————

\V^

• - ="*"-*——!

• • —m=m=-m

1

CO

inCs]

r~~PJHD

is — -

PJ%p— (

in H|

PJCOcu"Sw

>no

(—1in - in


SR303369

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS

Rising Head Test #1MonitorWellLS-16


Rc=


Well

40 feet11. 13 feet


40ln(Re/rw)=

Specifications


rw=

A=2.7571 B=

•

2 inches6 inches

28.87 feet

0.2500 feet'•

2.70.45

Results





36.34 ft/day

3.9 feet

Graphical Results

T303

bO

0.001

0.0,

E i:

1 „. , 1.5. . 2- 2.5Time (mm)data points _ regression line

SR303370

•»- co

"w c/)

•D "0CO >0 >

C Cw 5


ftR30337l

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS


Well Specifications


Rc=


4011.13

101000.15

40ln(Re/rw) =


A= 2.72.7571 B= 0.45

Results



Effective radial^ ^ of slug

distancetest =


40.89 ft/day

3.9 feet

Graphical Results

10

CT1 '<4

¥*.O60c£"-

0.001c

y\'£;\ It

- \* E\ E S I

\ ' B

'.

• \\\\\

.E E a

B B S

TlE data points

E

I B B E E

,

me (min)regr

3 t: i:

25 3 35

ession line

flR303372

CM CO

TD 0CO >0 >"T- k_oc "E


SR303373

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS



Rc=


Well

40 feet11. 13 feet


40ln(Re/rw) =

Specifications


rw=

A=2.7571 B =

2 inches6 inches

28.87 feet

0.2500 feet

2.70.45




Effective radial distance_____of slug test =__________3.9 feet___

Graphical Results

10

£•oa<uXc °-' !OJMC03

5 0.0,

0.001 (

^

BB B

•fr j.

N3

«*-_ E~~~-WB

S~vj

"S ^————— B-S.. ;: ————— --

<S~" -B-T3- ^

!

^

:

" """- P1

0.1 0.2 _,OJ , . . 0.4 OJ O.o 0.7Time (mm)B data points _ regression line

AR3Q337U

"SCO0X i-O) *-.E c= oCO

in O in >—> in csj ino o I "• I rj

I I I


SLUG TEST ANALYSIS



Rc=


Well

40 feet11. 13 feet


40ln(Re/rw) =

Specifications


rw=

A=2.7571 B=

2 inches6 inches

28.87 feet

0.2500 feet

2.70.45




Effective radial distance____of slug test =__________3.9 feet___

Graphical Results

10

•T" 14_J

03

XcQJC03

O 0.01

0.001(

^

i* ast

X

"'x B1

s. EX

f

t3 C

'\

E

OJ „. . 1 , U 2Time (mm)B data Doints regression line

8R303376

in

C\J ooco i———ii————————————————————___. r m -4- I i ^w ,« I Z0H"o — wCO0

x o ——•—————————————————————-i « a-*-1 I ! PJ

C 'F t/D= o ^

JPJ


SR303377

U-l*

in o in •—' m CN in ro inO O I — I rN I ro

I I I I

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS



Rc=


Well


100 feet0.1 4 feet

40ln(Re/rw) =

Specifications


rw=

A=3.2300 B =

2 inches6 inches

77.8 feet

0.2500 feet

2.70.45

Results





273.37 ft/day

6.3 feet

Graphical Results

10

•areX

<uc03

*-' 0.01

0.001(

itBj.

11

1 *

"t\ -

EJ S

E E E BEE 1

E

: E 0 E :

c

:

!

) OJ 1 . .. _1.S ... 2 2.5 3 35Time (mm)B data points _ regression line

ftR303378

in

in(N

CO

H

to \ f SH- i! • s• 0 0 I Sco >0 > _____________________m__________i o PJ£ c i • w

E

vo in •<* co


flR303379

ind

(1333) QV3H NI 3OMVH3

flR303380

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS



Rc=


Well


40ln(Re/rw)=

Specifications


rw=

A=3.2300 B=

2 inches6 inches

77.8 feet

0.2500 feet

2.70.45

Results





282.72 ft/day

6.3 feet

Graphical Results

10

1

s~OreVXc 0.1CJ00cJU 0.0,

0.001(

;eE

V-p ——e

m

E! E BE B B

i

E B E E !

) B

i B e E E !

& 1

0.5 1 _,. , U. . 2 15Time (mm)B data points _ regression line

AR30338!

w co i • • PJ0 -J ' • HH : Dz

oc •= ! H

Q.^ u^ s^

UJ

I ' I(1333) QV3H MI 3OMVH3

AR303382


&R303383

CM ^ i——————————————————ii—————————————————I———•——i~^J"~ p„- - z

•O 15 1 - WCO 0 50)2C "F i ii I co— « I i ^«I n \ 5LL S i i ! W

ind

*

in —. in o in — in rs)—' d d I « I

I I

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS


Total well depth: 50.5Depth to water: 8.11Screen length (Le): 10Aquifer thickness: 1 00

Rc= 0.14

From type curve:Where Le/rw= 40

ln(Re/rw) =

Well

feetfeetfeetfeetfeet

Specifications.

Well diameter: 2 inchesBorehole diameter: 6 inchesSat. thickness (Lw): 42.39 feetSandpack porosity:

rw= 0.2500 feet

A= 2.72.9155 B= 0.45

Results





f8.52 ft/day

4.6 feet

Graphical Results

10 ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— •

1c

.

aX.S<unocCOJ£!J0 0.0,

VYY

t>ECE

\

\

j j

E

'0 1 2 3

B data poin'Time (ts

i1

-

t

"0 B i:

"

~ . . 6 7 8 9 10mm)regression line

&R3Q3381*

00

•o 0CO >0 >"T" k.oc 'E


AR303385

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS


Well Specifications


Rc=


50.5 feet8. 11 feet10 feet

100 feet0.14 feet

40ln(Re/rw) =


rw=

A=2.9155 B =

2 inches6 inches

42.39 feet

0.2500 feet

2.70.45




Effective radial distance____of slug test =__________4,6 feet

Graphical Results

•o03<UX

SJtoc

OJ „. . . . 1Time (mm)data points _ regression line

SR3Q3386

«M (.5,

*T•M '

82"O "0CO >0 >-1- k.-*- oo) ±;c c• MOT ^^w °£ 2

——— • — —__B_B=|HH••

1

———————— 1

1

———————— 1

1

———————— 1

1

———————— 1

•

1

t

1

•

m

n-

cTTwH

SPJ^PsM«4

ta '

- r^

en

(1333) QV3H MI 3OMVH3

flR303387

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS



Rc=


Well


100 feet0.1 4 feet

40ln(Re/rw) =

Specifications


rw=

A=2.9155 B =

ii|

2 inches6 inches

42.39 feet

0.2500 feet

2.70.45

Results



Effective radial distanceB^. of slug test =


21 .00 ft/day

4.6 feet

Graphical Results

10

-4—1

^

•uaDXc o-1<utocca6 0.0, °

0.001

&3 •-

'ik. '

V; - > ...'».. """^

'ee

- -B.i•• E Q

E E

x B !

\

C B B B B B I: i: . i

) 05 . . 1 ,-,1.5 ... 2 2J. 3 ._ 3.5.Time (mm)m data points

-• --regression line

QR303388


^^303389

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS



Rc=


Well


40ln(Re/rw) =

Specifications


rw=

A=2.9155 B=

————————————————2 inches6 inches

42.39 feet

0.2500 feet

2.70.45




Effective radial distancefl of slug test = 4.6 feet

Graphical Results

10

1

•oS »•'X

u&0 °-oiCreU

0.001

0.0001(

•

x

—

^

- B B :: E

•

>N"\ H 0 E e 8;

1 1! IN--^ '

. - 0.5 „!. . . 15 2 25Time (mm)B data points __ regression line

AR303390

*. °° •-SRS T- I,*- I «

CD H-*.E c= o

\

7(1333) QV3H MI 3OMVH3

4R30339I

HD

ULJmHQWCOcu

iqO

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS


Well Specifications

Total well depth: 90 feet Well diameter: 2 inchesDepth to water: 8.53 feet Borehole diameter: 6 inchesScreen length (Le): 10 feet Sat. thickness (Lw): 81.47 feetAquifer thickness: 100 feet Sandpack porosity:

Rc= 0.13 feet rw= 0.2500 feet

From type curve:Where Le/rw= 40 A= 2.7__ _________ln(Re/rw)=_____3.2676________B=____0.45______




Effective radial distanceof slug test = _______6.6 feet___

Graphical Results

10

S '•areuX.£ 0-1ubOCa5 „.„,

0.001'

*

\ •B\ .

fc: \ B

\*!

\\

a

E

\

Y

BE

f ,

E

B

5 0.05 0.1 rrA15 , . x 0.2 0.25 OJ 0.35Time (mm)B data points __ regression line

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS


AR30339.3

Well Specifications


Rc==


908.53101000.14

40ln(Re/rw)=

feet Well diameter: 2 inchesfeet Borehole diameter: 6 inchesfeet Sat. thickness (Lw): 81. 47 feetfeet Sandpack porosity:feet rw= 0.2500 feet

A= 2.73.2676 B= 0.45

Results



Effective radialof slug

distancetest =


'209.02 ft/day

6.6 feet

Graphical Results

10

^ 're

to

U o.01

0.001

\

'l B

S E

\ <?

\\(i E E

1 E B e

\E B B B B E B E 1: i B

13 1 „,. 2 . 3 tTime (mm)

8 data points __ regression line

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS


Well Specifications


Rc=



100 feet0.1 4 feet

40ln(Re/rw) =


rw=

.A=3.2676 B =

2 inches6 inches

81 .47 feet

0.2500 feet

2.70.45




Effective radial distanceof slug test = 6.6 feetp

Graphical Results

10

&^ 'reUJXC «.l

0)bfiCre5 0.01

n wii

1"tE E

tffi

1 B

B B

\ B 1i B E (: B B B .

.

3

0.5 1 ' „. , 1.5. s 2Time (mm)data points _ regression line

SR30339U

T3 0CO >0 >1 O0.1=:c c

COPJHD2

C/D

inen

in ^ en

(1333) QV3H MI 3OMVHO

WS

in

COCL,

UJ

in


flR303396

C/5

X -D) •*-*.E 'E— oCO LL


6R303397


AR303398

APPENDIX H

Irrigation Well Assessment

4R303399

H.I Operational Periods of Irrigation Wells

Hastings Irrigation Well

HR303UOI

0COCO '0COCO _

0 ggcoc *

cd

Ec/s

03 .S

0303

s

Q

O 3=O

E |a SaOIH3d330/KO §.

.0COCO0COCO

0) §

Ui

W5

03 .SO) tS•r" 03

03

PJ

Q

C -_o *§E °-g. SaOIH3d330/NO I

AR303U03

iE

103

tsl

I

_-I

Q

J_____I___I___I___I___I___I___I___I '"3C 3= IO O S

I" EE. SdOIH3d 33O / NO S.

0

COCO0COCO rt

0 g

03 .£O) to

I

E"003

(SftICOaI

I00

§ 1E °-i. saoi>iad33o/NO I

0COCO0COCO

0D03

< q

i00

s

§ 'ga p"I SQOIHHd 33O / MO a

4-1c0ECOCO0COCO _< 13

"0 J.SPC'Cuo ~

"03 .<=?0) 3•j; 03^ DC

1E10L.D03_l

-

I i i i i i i i

-

enI

Q ko.00

8i00

O *= •*o (

AR3Q3U07

0 .

COCO0COCO _

= i11> 03t>JDc 'E.9 ~+* &JD03 .5O) £•r- 03t E

DC

"0

03

tnI

cn

*/ NO |

6R303U08

0COCO0COCO _< 13

50 g

M)

c 'E•B a"S .sO) £•r" 03

I

E

103

I I_____________i i

oI

8- w<5

0-.Ia.

Q.

Eg. SQOIHHd 330 / NO |

&R303U09

CoIIins Irrigation Well

1"

__

r

c0ECOCO0COCO^ ?

"55 g^ '•3

bfic -cO A

: '4= g1 ^ -5"C Ok_

1E

1D03—I

—

1 1 1 1

-

»-n1

i jO

1C3

1

•

fS

1

1 H

D

1c

1

fsl1C

o % Ic1- Q.: P1 SQOIH3J33O/NO 1.

d

- r r-——————————————————————

4-"

.0

ECOCO0COCO< s

"0 C> .2> •*->03— .2P.2 ~CO |"C (j)U.

1E"0D03-J

K

—

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

c ô 1Q. ,E3 O /T /"~"\ T \T ' — T _T T T/* / IvT/' X •

i"3

1o

tlJH

.

< ^^

r8i

i8

r-i1c7

5 SX

5

•

*

ftR303UI2

0COCO0COCO= 10 c_o

03GJDc -c

O £'£5 </503 .S

O

DC

"003

PJ

j_____i

E

c0ECOCO0COCO

"33 c> '-~>

bDc -co ~eo .1.£? ?

1

DC"0303

-

-

-

i i i i i i i

i

i003

1

S

<NO

Itq•ii3 -

I

I3

§. §.

0COCO0COCO^ ==

o

D03

0 e

C 'C2 ~3 5/203 .S

I

Q

<I

S!J____I____\_____I____I_____I____I____I I____I

0

COCO0COCO< |g"0

ODc -coO J - <

DC

"0D03

<03 .5O5 E

J_________I I I_________L

I8-toIm

Io<uenI

H

8

a

°s.

I T

[4-1

. 0

ECOCO0COCOf ^ 4

s"0 c^ 2

OJOC H1 0 ^

I'ro Ir o^ *o"E u™

iE

1

-

_

i i i i i

C/l1

^11"1«

PJ

f— 1.^

Q

i8-C/31

1Q-C/]

C ftz 10 0 §Q. Q.

1 SQOIH3d330/NO 1

ftR303M7

0COCO0COCO

c -cO A• 3 5203 ^

DC

"5303

Q

ia

Eg.

H.2 Monitor Well Hydrographs

ftR303M9

Monitor Well LD-1

8

DC

103

a

Q

(1333) 13A31HHXVAV NI HONVH3

0ECOCO0COw ^

0

c,gO)

D03

(X33d) 1HAH1 ilHXVM NI 3ONVHD

flR303U22

0

I T« S(/) J_

0

03

0 g^ •-> coC S.2 &4-4 <4-l

03 J2

OUi

I10(S

H<Q

IO

NI 39NVHD

AR303U23

0COCO0COCO<0

co'•§o>

0D03

(1333) 13A31 H31VAY NI 3ONVHD

&R3Q3U21*

I00

DC

"33

03

IXJ-tsl

I00iS!i

1 2(1333) 13AH1H31VAY NI 3ONVHO

0

I 78 SCO J

0 o§ 5

Oc 2

8-2

DC

D03

2.

(SI&IO.

(X333) 1HA31H3XVM NI H9NVHO

AR303i*26

0D03

HQ

on(N I

1HAH1 tfHXVM NI H9NVH3

AR303i*27

—i —

0coCO V0 Ico QCO J

o§ *I-O) Cu•r- 03

oc0303

rs»>IoO

I

Q

IQ.£i

1HA31H3XVM NI 39NVH3

Monitor Well LS-2

D03

sIn

r-J rl -rj- to Io o o o" 2I I I I

13AH1H3XVM NI 39NVH3

flR303lf30

Q

(X333) 1HAH1 EHJLVAV NI H9NVHO

flR303U3,i

c0

COCO0COCO

iicC SO u

03 ^

•s? IJ— too— O

S-4

DC

|03

Q

i3

Io

13A31H3XVM NI 39NVH3

Q

(XHH3) 13A31H3XVM NI H9NVH3

AR3Q3l*33

DC

"0

03

3

1

t%Q

(XH33) 13A31H3XVM NI H9NVHD

c0COCO0COCO

5 1o

.2 b03 S

tooO

£•503

J:^<^

1a,

Q

••* l/"> \Oo o oI I I

(X333) 1HAHT HHXVM NI 39NVHO

0COCO <xi0 ICO &co J< =5

Ioc-03UttoCOU"O

DC

"0

03

Q

o oI I

13AHT H3XVM NI H9NVH3

—i —

0

i

03 o5 -s

DC

£D03

O

o £

Ift feb±= o

<

0>£ooI

o>IIX

Q

enI

ia.

(X3H3) 13A31HHXVM NI 39NVHO

Monitor Well LS-3

ftR303U38

0

COCO0COCO

i I^ E

OZtooOu

£D03

13AHT HHXVM NI 39NVHD

0

COco0COCO

oC S.2 s4-* '—03 .=O) o-• ••• ck_ Ui_ too— O

DC

"0

03

b

S!i

H<Q

o o o o o oI I I I I I

13A31H3XVM NI 39NVH3

Q

(X333) 33A31H3XVAV NI 39NVHO

0

i 78 2co d

0 o

C •£-2 £4-« ^03 ^

•= Ii ou"OI >-.

DC

"0

03

(X333) 13A31H3XVM NI 39NVH3

0£)

c0COCO coCD ICO co

coi-Ho

.0) UE 2.= too

Oi-lI "°i >->_ ffiDC

"0D03

i00

(X333) 13A3T H3XVAV NI 39NVH3

o-Ia.

0

COCO rn0 ICO coCO J

0cO

C SO u4= £03 43O) o-••» 03L. Uu. too

DC

"0D03

<£.Os

ir

(NON

I

3°

00

"0 0 0 0 * 0 0 o 'I I I I I I I

(X333) 13A31H3XVAV NI 39NVH3

k0coCO *?0 ICO coCO J

• coC S

UiO

g-utooO

TH-i

DC

"0

03

0•s s 'JD ~ -

PJ

Q

o o o o o oI I I . I I I

(X333) 33A31 H3XVAV NI 39NVH3

0

„

D03

rtS IW 3co d

0 o

c O g'% i.CL,

03

:\

(X333) 33A31H3XVM NI 39NVHD

II

frCOI

tnf-j r-^ O T-J CS Io o d c> JJ

I I

Monitor Well LS-8

AR303H7

£D03

f PJ

ID

(X33d) 13A31H3XVM NI 39NVH3

0CO ooCO I0 coCO â I-— toO0 .S5 5 — 1

2

O) -=•r- o-r- 03• IM~™ toO

O

DC

"53D03

(X333) 13A31H3XVM NI 39NVHO

k0

COCO op0 ICO coCO ^< =5

003

tooO

3ItA

S_3

Q

_ _ar—VIIO

(X333) 33A31H3XVAV NI 39NVHO

c0COCO op0 ICO coCO J

0

CGO

03 4=D) o-•c 2V. toO•— O

DC

"5303

1S

PJn

8i3

OiJl_3

r i - 10 vo r ooO O O O O OI I I I I I

13A31H3IVM NI 3ONVHO

I00

0CO ooCO i0 coCO JCO —

— toO0 .S

o,

0)u. c-V- 03

febo

£D03

i003 PJ

s <Q

SP

i00

A1 s

(X333) 13A3T H3XVM NI 39NVH3

0ECO ooCO I0 coCO »-}

toOeCD .£o• ?—4

C

03 £O) ,c•J3 CX

"™ toOOi >-i

£D03

I-

\ften

t PJ

Q

sii00

<ri


flR303if53

k01 °pco 'CO ^7* ""I< "—i too3 r5 2

03toilo

0D03

tsON1

enI

PJ

IIa.ocoI

tsONICL,

IO 1-1 lo IO I r-5 %.

(X333) 33A31 3XVAV NI 39NVH3

V '>,» »J: •?t

C0COCO co0 ICO coCO •-}<

• Coc 2O U,

SCHH

03

ONI

I

ONI

II

r-JI

Q

ON

frcnI

ONI8-CO

o I

(X333) 13A31 H31VM. NI 3ONVHO

SR303U55

Monitor Well LS-12

—I——

0CO cS(CO TH0 ICO coCO ^<

coJ-i.O

,_ 03^ *-"»- toO"" O

03

a 5Q

<

IS

ic3

SiIc

(S •**• *& oo I-Hd o d o' I 12

I I I I

(X333) 33A31 H3XVM NI 39NVH3

AR303U57

0

I s0 ICO coCO J

03O5

.o

4= ,P

*wtooO

I r- •

—— ^

DC

"5303

_3IO

PJ

Q

S!i3

8!ic

1O I


k0

i0COCO

JUoS-iO

'E 2— tooO

£D03

(NON

I

_i_3*I

S

I

o'I

(X333) 33A31 H3XVM NI 39NVH3


&R3Q3U60

k0COCO CO0 7co 2< —

0

c

€1

£D03

coUi

O) UM03UtoDO

!nHM

PJ

5Q

I00

00I(X333) 13A31H3XVM NI 39NVH3

0w r<iCO S0 ICO coCO J

03

DC

"003

co£

.0

Mo

COI

tsON

IG.OCOI

ft mco I-Mj. H* <Q

00

(/"> -r-< 1/1 I

f ' 7s

(X333) 13A31 >I3XVM NI 39NVH3

&R303U62

k0

i 0 iCO co

DC

£D03

S-4O

toOO

r--d

I


0to ^8 7CO C/D3^0 IM

O

<= IO t4= £03 \"O) •§,'E 2JZ toO

OV-i

I Î * ""l

*T|MH

£D03

d

<NONI

Q

ON

8-COI

8-CO

O


Monitor Well LS-14

AR303l»65

k0

I 20 ICO coCO J

SMO§ co

C 5

03UtooO

DC

"5303

Io

PJ

S!ic

Siic3

d dI I


0

i 20 iCO coCO nJ<0

DC

£ID03

.2 t:JS O

03toOO \

Si

IO

PJ

Q

Si

dI

(X333) 33A31 >33XVAV NI 39NVH3

kc0to rtco S0 iCO coCO J

C

£D03

D ~ X * £. o , S %O) "OH

03j-itoOO

SiI

•5 PJ

NO ood d

I I

(X333) 13A33 H3XVM NI 39NVH3

0

1 20) I03 co

_£0 »-,

§ !'O5 "toJDOUc

DC

"0

03

Si

Is

SI00< wQ

ON_l_

3

. .o o oI I I


H

ONI

I00


0

CO rfCO 1-10 1CO coCO J

CO'S03O)

co

too

003

r-iON

.0.oCOI

ONI8-COI

PJ

SiI003

I

f

(X333) 13A31 H3XVM NI 39NVH3

(X33d) 13A31H3XVAV NI 39NVH3

AR303t*72

0CO TJ-CO rH0 ICO coCO J^ "Vi •>'

05

Os s

ffi

0

03

_ . . . . . . . QO) o<•—» 03^ toO— Ol-i

ONI

ONI

I" qj

8-CO1

(NON

8-oo \o Tt (s o fs)o d d d d

(X333) 13A31 3XVAV NI 39NVH3

Monitor Well LS-16

&R3G3U7U

k0

8 s0 ICO co

Ro

S'5

C J0

03IMtooO

DC

"5303

Q

siic3

d d d dI I I I


T

0Eco S0 iCO coJ

Co

£03

i_o<—I

'5o

O) "a,

toOOJ-i

•

PJ

Sii

d c> o' o o' d d o' dI I I I I I I I I


RR303U76

0CO \oCO i-i0 ICO coCO J

0 n5 a

Oc S

O) CL,•j- 03

±1HH

0

303

ia

PJH

j_3

A

o' o" d d d d d d dI I I I I I I I I


c0COco0COCO

oc S

03O) 03L-I

toO

DC

"0

03


AR303U78

c0COco ;£0 7to J,co 2<

l-itoJDO

DC

"0

03

H


1-1 i1 §

c0CO ^CO i-«0 ICO coCO H-l= 1IIoB *•*"D) OH••— 03H *Mi- too— o

DC

1303

T-l I I ^

ia.&

8-COI

In.

Si

SiIoo

?

(X333) 13A31 H3XVM NI 39NVH3

RR303U80

ONIO.

ONICu

Ia.ocoI


0

CO \oCO 1-10 ICO coCO J

S_io•t—I

'So

2tooo

£303

ONI'ooI8

fs!ONI(X

Q

(NON

8-CO

I

CO( I«


Monitor Well LS-17

AR303U83

c0ES2 ^CO r-H0 ICO coCO J

<D= £Q> g

'S

O2Uia45a-03S_itooO

£303

Sii

S!I

oI10 I• 1/1


0CO r,CO S0 ICO coCO J

0

oc -

>O) B,'E 2^ toO

_ KDC

"0303

Si

io

PJ

107

(X333) 13A3T 3XVM NI 39NVH3

c0ECO £0 ICO coCO J

DC

0303

MO

C 5

V

i-<Q

toOO

g7toCS

i PJ

Si


fiR303t*86

0CO ^co u;0 iCO coCO J< =

03O)

DC

£303

QJ j-

co

1

§'

00

Q

d dl I

(X333) 13A31 >I3XVAV NI 39NVH3

RR303U87

0303

00

<

PJH

00_ 3


0

CO ^CO S0 ICO coCO J

0

coC 2.2 %oS ^D) 71

toJDO

DC

£303

c1

o.Ic.oCOI

CO1

PJHQ

Sii


&R3Q3U89

0CO ^CO ^0 ICO coCO J

«

£303

CD

"53 £

5 |O

I!D) B,

>-»DC

ONIO.UCOI00

PJ

COI

Icu

oI

(X333) 13A31 >33XVAV NI 39NVH3

fiR303if90

0

ITII

= IO 4= &03 ^

MH

0303

ONI

Q

I8-COI

COo I

(X3Hd) 73A31H3XVAV NI 3ONVH3

BR303U9.I

• Monitor Well LS-19

PJ


0COCO0C/3CO

coC SO t

•••% ZI?.-. 03V— s_<V_ toO•" Ou

DC

0303

PJ

SQ

s;

3

f ' 7s

(X333) 13A31 H3XVM NI 39NVH3

0COCO0COCO

o> g§ •£

OC

s-lo

^

Laurel Rl -

Irr

igHydrograp

__^~

C^^

^

[&.

- ! O ( N i 3 - \ O O O i — i f ->' d o' d o' 1 i-1


ON1371—1

i

7

ONJi_3I

S

ONI3

SR303U95


5R303496

(X333) 13A31 3XVAV NI 39NVH3


(1,33d) 13A3T H3XVAV NI 3ONVHD

HR303U99


RR303500

APPENDIX IMeteorological Data for 17 June 1992

4-R30350I

SUSSEX COUNTY, DEL • LAUREL LANDFILLMETEOROLOGICAL DATA

17 JUNE 1992

SOUTH

EAST

3 NORTH

j5 WEST

SOUTH

EAST

NORTH i i i l i i l i i l l i i i i i i i i i i i900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900

930 1030 1130 1230 1330 1430 1530 1630 1730 1830 1930TIME [EOT]

100

uT80

60

40

20

I I I I I I | | | | J I

201816

14

12

10

86

4

900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900930 1030 1130 1230 1330 1430 1530 1630 1730 1830 1930

TIME [EDT]

AR303502

ll SUSSEX COUNTY. DEL. - LAUREL LANDFILLW WIND ROSE

17 JUNE 1992HOUR 0900 - HOUR 2000 [EOT]

.

-/J» ^

' ' * —— ' —— 1 —— 1 —— 11 3 B 10 16 21 99SCALE (MPH)

WIND SPEED (MPH) PERCENT OCCURRENCE1-3 3-6 6-10 " 10-16 1E-2P ">21 "

N 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

NNE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

NE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

ENE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

E 0.00 2.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 '

ESE 1.53 18.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

SE 1.53 48.85 13.74 0.00 0.00 0.00

^ KSE 0.76 4.58 8.40 0.00 0.00 0.00

'

S, 2.29

\ \.

WIND SPEED (MPH) PERCENT1-3 3-6 6-10 10-16

S 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

SSW 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

SW 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

WSW 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00W 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00WNW 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00NW 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

NNW 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

OCCURRENCE16-21 "~ *210.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.000.00 0.000.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

flR303503

APPENDIX J

Soil Gas Screening Results

/5R303501*

Summary of Soil Gas Survey

Results from Survey of Landfill GasesGridAR06-LGA

SampleLocationAR06-LGA-01AR06-LGA-02AR06-LGA-03AR06-LGA-04AR06-LGA-05AR06-LGA-06AR06-LGA-07AR06-LGA-08AR06-LGA-09AR06-LGA-10AR06-LGA-11AR06-LGA-12AR06-LGA-13AR06-LGA-14AR06-LGA-15AR06-LGA-16AR06-LGA-17AR06-LGA-18AR06-LGA-19AR06-LGA-20AR06-LGA-21AR06-LGA-22

Date17-Jun-9217-Jun-9217-Jun-9217-Jun-9217-Jun-9217-Jun-9217-Jun-9217-Jun-9217-Jun-9217-Jun-9217-Jun-9217-Jun-9217-Jun-9217-Jun-9217-Jun-9217-Jun-9217-Jun-9217-Jun-9217-Jun-9217-Jun-9217-Jun-9217-Jun-92

Monitoring Results (% Composition)Methane5.048.5 '5.80.00.00.053.34.40.00.02.18.050.61.611.86.11.643.30.012.03.020.5

Carbon Dioxide5.041.76.03.0

_ 5.00.029.15.20.99.63.510.341.44.816.98.313.823.33.617.18.323.5

Oxygen16.04.516.918.617.521.42.518.020.012.27.912.23.114.39.715.68.87.818.69.115.57.4

AR3035Q5

Summary of Soil Gas Survey(cont'd)


SampleLocationAR07-LGA-01AR07-LGA-02AR07-LGA-03AR07-LGA-04AR07-LGA-05AR07-LGA-06AR07-LGA-07AR07-LGA-08AR07-LGA-09AR07-LGA-10AR07-LGA-11AR07-LGA-12AR07-LGA-13AR07-LGA-14AR07-LGA-15AR07-LGA-16AR07-LGA-16(Duplicate)AR07-LGA-17AR07-LGA-18AR07-LGA-19AR07-LGA-20AR07-LGA-21AR07-LGA-22AR07-LGA-23AR07-LGA-24

Date18-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-92

18-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-92

Monitoring Results (% Composition)Methane0.30.820.730.19.64.80.015.111.111.915.80.00.042.50.064.753.6

0.00.058.81.851.452.362.351.9

Carbon Dioxide4.40.810.612.58.44.30.910.49.49.420.40.52.130.86.622.916.9

1.52.833.02.839.740.320.717.7

Oxygen14.219.713.510.613.917.220.614.516.013.89.920.619.66.815.98.25.3

19.218.83.619.63.23.04.96.4

SR303506



1 SampleLocationAR08-LGA-01AR08-LGA-02AR08-LGA-03AR08-LGA-04AR08-LGA-05AR08-LGA-06AR08-LGA-07AR08-LGA-08AR08-LGA-09AR08-LGA-10AR08-LGA-11AR08-LGA-12AR08-LGA-13AR08-LGA-14AR08-LGA-15AR08-LGA-16AR08-LGA-17AR08-LGA-18AR08-LGA-19AR08-LGA-20AR08-LGA-21(Inside Well LS-1)

Date18-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-92ts-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-92

Monitoring Results (% Composition)Methane0.00.00.156.356.20.513.254.30.00.50.00.052.50.00.00.00.00.016.641.624.3

Carbon Dioxide0.12.50.736.534.03.210.042.61.11.74.23.341.70.70.40.91.60.613.228.518.4

Oxygen20.818.320.02.42.518.911.63.119.719.817.518.02.520.519.819.520.020.710.96.812.2


Results from Survey of Landfill GasesPerimeter Locations

SampleLocationAR09-LGA-01

AR09-LGA-02AR09-LGA-03AR09-LGA-04AR09-LGA-05AR09-LGA-06

Date18-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218-Jun-9218~Jun-92

Monitoring Results (% Composition)Methane0.00.20.80.00.00.0

Carbon Dioxide1.38.50.80.62.02.4

Oxygen19.715.420.220.519.219.0

SR3Q3508

APPENDIX K

Landfill Settlement Point Elevation Summary

AR303509

CO££|51°-3iO UJ

B£g CO:* u.m oCO Oc/5 z8.SIIZ 253111 111S UJ

55

« Se iO «;

1?ijj »

Elevation *

05-Oct-92

Elevation *

23-Sep-92

CM« 0>C 1

Elevatio

08-Sep

Elevation *

24-Aug~9a

Elevation *

IO-Aug-92

«'Ifm E5

Elevation *

13-Jul-92

Bevation *

29-Jun-92

• S= l5 c1 'a 1E »

Bevation *

01-Jun-92

Settlement

Point ID

8S

%5

oow§

S39

Si

s9

orj-O

8d*r

ooCMoT

md

89

r-

8s

500

88

3&

§O5

fe

g

S8

8O5

S^

§8"

89?

S8'

CMIn.CO

CO

0

CT

i

CM

i

oo

•rf

i

COr-

?

TT

O

0)

§

Nr—

9'

T

C)

(

i

COIQ.03

S3

S?

S?

inQTJ-

S?

feco•fl-

feCO

sCOTT

0

?'

§CO

%9

VI£L(n

Scvi

a?

ISsi

scvi

S?$

s.5!

few

E8c\iM-

8cO•*

5Cvi

§$

inlQ_CO

5

q5

i"3-

8

g

§

8!5

§

S»»•

§r

2

5TT

COIQ.CO

%

8!5

8?

TT

8?

8!5

&*t

S?

S5

Si•T

K^t

r--lD.CO

S*t

N

5

fl5

CMh-TT

T—1 -

5

N?'

CJN-r

S?

fl?

8•f

S?

co

i

COCO

10

i

in

§

inco

-

f .i

en

i

h.i

O5

COf

•*

COTT

g°?

coTT

O)

ci

ei i

Rr>-'r

e

Rh-'

CMh-N•o-

Si^

r!j

Sh~"T

O>COh-;T

oSh-'

8t

o

i

CO

§£COi8.'5.

I<s

tto

"5a0

'S

1C/)m1.2I0UJ

1«

SR303510

Slug Test Results · SLUG TEST ANALYSIS Rising Head Test #1 Monitor Well LD-1 Well Specifications Total well depth: Depth to water: Screen length (Le): Aquifer thickness:

Documents