SLOVAKIA / SLOVAQUIE / ESLOVAQUIA
Jun 13, 2020
SLOVAKIA / SLOVAQUIE / ESLOVAQUIA
1
Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species
of Wild Animals
Format for reports of Parties on implementation of theConvention on the Conservation of Migratory Species
of Wild Animals (revision of January 2002)
Reporting format agreed by the Standing Committee at its 23rd meeting (Bonn, December 2001) for voluntary use byParties, on a trial basis, for reports submitted to COP7. Refer to separate instructions on completing the report.
The questions below combine elements of Resolution 4.1 (Party Reports) adopted by the Fourth Meeting of theConference of the Parties (Nairobi, June 1994) and Resolution 6.4 (Strategic Plan for the Convention on MigratorySpecies 2000-2005), adopted by the Sixth Meeting of the Conference of the Parties (Cape Town, November 1999), as wellas commitments arising from other operational Resolutions and Recommendations of the Conference of the Parties.
Which agency has been primarily responsible for the preparation of this report?
Ministry of the Environment
List any other agencies that have provided input:State Nature Conservancy of the Slovak Republic
I(a). General Information
Please complete any unfilled boxes and amend and/or update as appropriate the information provid ed in the table below:
Reports submitted: 2002
Period covered by this report: 1998 - 2001
Date of entry into force of the Convention in Slovakia: 1 March 1995
Territory to which the Convention applies: Slovak Republic
Reservations (against species listings): None
Designated Focal Point:
Mr. Peter PilinskýMinistry of the EnvironmentDept. of Nature and Landscape ProtectionNám. L. Stúra 1812 35 BratislavaSlovakia
Tel.: (+421 7) 59 56 21 89Fax: (+421 7) 59 56 25 33E-mail: [email protected]
Appointment to the Scientific Council:
Dr. Marcel UhrínDirector GeneralNational Park Muránska Planina Administrationstr. Janka Král'a 1205001 RevúcaSlovakia
Tel.: (+421 58) 442 2061Fax: (+421 58) 441 6119E-mail: [email protected]
Alternate member:
Ing. Ján TopercerComenius UniversityBotanic GardenDetached Unit03815 Blatnica 315Slovakia
Tel.: (+421 43) 494 82 13Fax: (+421 43) 494 82 13E-mail: [email protected]
2
Membership of the Standing Committee: Not applicable
Competent authority: Ministry of the Environment (nature conservation)
Ministry of Agriculture (hunting & huntable species)
Implementing legislation: Act of the Ministry of Agriculture 172/1975 onhunting
Law 17/1992 on Environment
Act of the National Council of the Slovak Republic No.287/1994 on Nature and Landscape Protection
Act of the National Council of the Slovak Republic No.115/1995 on the Protection of Animals
Other relevant conventions/agreements (apart from CMS) towhich Slovakia is a Party:
Convention on Wetlands of International Importance especiallyas Waterfowl Habitats wetlands (Ramsar Convention);
Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD);
Convention on the Conservatio of European Wildlife andNatural Habitats (Bern Convention).
National policy instruments (e.g. national biodiversityconservation strategy, etc.):
National biodiversity conservation strategy (NBCS);
Action plan for implemantation of NBCS ( 1998 – 2010);
National Environmental Action plan II;
National strategy for sustainable development;
Great Bustard MoU: Party Signed but not yet entered force Non-party
National Contact Point
Regional Unit of State Nature Conservancy of the SlovakRepublic
Name: Jozef ChavkoAddress:str. Hanulova5/DP.O.Box 155844 40 BratislavaSlovakia
Tel.: (+421 7) 64 36 99 46Fax: (+421 7) 64 28 39 82
E-mail: [email protected]
EUROBATS: Party Signed but not yet entered force Non-party
Competent authority: Ministry for the Environment
Name: Mr. Peter PilinskýAddress:Ministry of the EnvironmentDept. of Nature and Landscape ProtectionNám. L. Stúra 1812 35 BratislavaSlovakia
Tel.: (+421 7) 59 56 21 89Fax: (+421 7) 59 56 25 33E-mail: [email protected]
Appointed member of the Advisory Committee
Name: Dr. Marcel UhrínAddress:National Park Muránska Planina Administrationstr. Janka Král'a 1205001 RevúcaSlovakia
Tel.: (+421 58) 442 2061Fax: (+421 58) 441 6119E-mail: [email protected]
Membership of other committees or working groups:
AEWA: Party Signed but not yet entered force Non-party
Administrative Authority
Name:Address:Ministry of the EnvironmentDept. of Nature and Landscape Protection
Appointed member of the Technical Committee
Name:Address:State Nature Conservancy of the Slovak RepublicLazovná 10
3
Nám. L. Stúra 1812 35 BratislavaSlovakia
Tel.: (+421 7) 59 56 21 89Fax: (+421 7) 59 56 25 33E-mail: [email protected]
Administrative Authority for huntable species
Ministry of the AgricultureDivision for ForestryDobrovicova 12812 66 Bratislava 1Slovakia
Tel.: (+421 7) 59 26 65 14Fax: (+421 7) 59 26 65 11
P.O.Box 5974 01 Banská BystricaSlovakia
Tel.: (+421 48) 415 42 69Fax: (+421 48) 415 50 27E-mail: [email protected]
Membership of other committees or working groups:
4
I(b). Additional General Information
1 Which other government departments are involved in activities/initiatives for the conservation of migratory species inyour country? (Please list.)
1a If more than one government department is involved, describe the interaction/relationship between these governmentdepartments:
2 List the main non-governmental organizations actively involved in initiatives for the conservation of migratory species inyour country, and describe their involvement:
Working Group on Research and Protection of Birds of Prey and Owls (SVODAS) is NGO, whose goals are:
research and conservation of birds of prey and owls in Slovakia; to organize people involved in research andconservation activities; to promote conservation of raptors in public, to provide consulting and organize activitiesconcerning research and conservation.
SVODAS especially concentrates on monitoring of the breeding occurrence of the most endangered species,identification of the factors that are a treat to these species, protection of nesting sites and other. Special attention is givento the problem of electrocution of birds on electric poles of 22 kV power lines. In cooperation with the European ringingcenter in France, SVODAS conducts a ringing program.
Society for Protection of Birds in Slovakia (SOVS)is NGO, which participates in:
research into the ecology and population trends of endangered bird species and their habitats; restoration of habitatssuitable for endangered species, reparation and undertaking of awareness campaigns for the specific groups of stake-holders (hunters, land owners); environmental education at schools.
3 Describe any involvement of the private sector in the conservation of migratory species in your country:
No records
4 Note any interactions between these sectors in the conservation of migratory species in your country:
No records
5
II. Appendix I species
1. BIRDS
1.1 General questions on Appendix I bird species
1 Identify the Ministry, agency/department, or organisation responsible for leading actions relating to Appendix I birdspecies:
Ministry of Environment, Division of Nature and Landscape Protection
2 Is the taking of all Appendix I bird species prohibited by the national implementing Yes Nolegislation cited in Table I(a) (General Information)?
If other legislation is relevant, please provide details:
2a If the taking of Appendix I bird species is prohibited by law, have any exceptions Yes Nobeen granted to the prohibition?
If Yes, please provide details:
3 Identify any obstacles to migration that exist in relation to Appendix I bird species:
3a What actions are being undertaken to overcome these obstacles?
3b What assistance, if any, does your country require in order to overcome these obstacles?
4 What actions have been taken to prevent, reduce or control factors that are endangering or are likely to further endangerbird species, including strictly controlling the introduction of, or controlling or eliminating, already introduced exoticspecies (Article III(4)(c))?
4a Describe any factors that may limit action being taken in this regard:
4b What assistance, if any, does your country require to overcome these factors?
1.2 Questions on specific Appendix I bird species
The following section contains a table for each Appendix I bird species for which your country is considered to be a RangeState. Please complete each table as appropriate, providing information in summary form. Where appropriate, pleasecross-reference to information already provided in national reports that have been submitted under other conventions(e.g. Convention on Biological Diversity, Ramsar Convention, CITES). (Attach annexes as necessary.)
SpeciesHaliaeetus albicilla– Common Name(s) White-tailed Eagle
1 Is your country a Range State for this species? Yes No
2 Please provide published distributionreference:
TRNKA, R., TRNKA , A., BOHUŠ, M. 1998. Occurence, abundance, monitoring and conservation of the White-tailed Eagle(Haliaeetus albicilla) in Slovakia in 1996-1997. Nature Conservation Vol.16, Banská Bystrica, Slovakia: 177-191. (inSlovak)
3 Summarise information on population size, trends and distribution (if known):
55 – 60 wintering specimens (45 specimens on Danube in 2002), increasing population trend, most abundant along
6
Danube, since 1999 they have bred here. In 2002 there are 4 breeding pairs along Danube, 1 breeding pair in VihorlatMts., other 2 possible breeding pairs are near Oravska water reservoir and Latorica river. Breeding is being regularlymonitored. During spring migration few specimens occured on Liptovska Mara (3-4 specimens) water reservoir andOravska water reservoir (8-11).
Within the period 1998-2001 – breeding of 3 pairs on Danube has been recorded in 2001, 2 breeding were not succesfulldue to disturbance by forestry activities and illegal video shooting. Further possible breeding of 1 pair near Oravska waterreservoir and 1 pair near Latorica river, has been recorded. There were 40-50 wintering specimens (30-40) along Danube.
During winter accounting along the Danube organized by State Nature Conservancy of the Slovak Republic -Administration of the Danube Floodplains Protected Landscape Area in cooperation with the Faculty of Natural Sciencesof the Comenius University Bratislava and Hungarian Fertőd – Hanság National Park on 26th January 2002 total of 45specimens have been recorded in section between Bratislava and Ostrihom.
4 Indicate (with an ‘X’) and briefly describe any activities that have been carried out in favour of this species in thereporting period. (Please provide the title of the project and contact details, where available.)
Research - mapping of occurence, winter accounting of White-tailed Eagles along Danube and in Norther Slovakia,project „Monitoring and protection of White-tailed Eagle in Slovakia“ – R. Trnka, J. Lengyel (SNC SR), Dr. M. Bohuš(FNS Comenius University Bratislava).
Monitoring - monitoring of the breeding pairs in Danube Floodplains - Dr. M. Bohuš, P.Rác (FNS ComeniusUniversity Bratislava), J.Lengyel, J.Chavko (SNC SR), winter accounting (SNC SR - Danube Floodplains PLA, FNS CUBratislava, Mr. Váczi Miklós -NP Fertőd – Hanság, Hungary), nest watching (SNC SR – J. Chavko)
Habitat protection - legislative protection of the habitats (designation of the Protected Range Oravska waterreservoir), 2001/2002 – negotiation on assigning the 500m wide buffer zone around the nest trees for 3 breeding pairsduring the breeding season
Habitat restoration - installation of artificial nests for White-Tailed Eagles near Oravska water reservoir in theframework of the project „Monitoring and protection of White-tailed Eagle in Slovakia“ – R. Trnka (SNC SR)
Other - Winter auxiliary feeding of the White-Tailed Eagles on Oravska and Liptovska Mara water reservoir in theframework of the project„Monitoring and protection of White-tailed Eagle in Slovakia“ – R. Trnka, P. Majko (SNC SR)
5 If no activities have been carried out for this species in the reporting period, what has prevented such action being taken?
6 Describe any future activities that are planned for this species:
- Winter accounting on Danube (Southern Slovakia), Oravská, Liptovská Mara, Tvrdošín, Bešeňová, Nová Bystricawater reservoirs (Northern Slovakia), Zemlínska Šírava water reservoir, Senné & Latorica Ramsar Sites (EasternSlovakia)
- Monitoring
- Nest watching and control of the nesting pairs along Danube and in Northern (Oravská water reservoir) and Eastern(Vihorlat Mts.) Slovakia
- Winter auxiliary feeding of the White-tailed Eagles on Oravská and Liptovská Mara water reservoirs
SpeciesAquila clanga– Common Name(s) Greater Spotted Eagle
1 Is your country a Range State for this species? Yes No
2 Please provide published distributionreference:
HUDEC, K.,ČERNÝ, W. et al. 1977. Fauna of the Czech and Slovak Socialistic Republic. Birds 2. Academia, Prague,Czechoslovak Socialistic Republic: 138-142. (in Czech)
TRNKA, A. 1997. Current List of Birds of Slovakia. Trnava University for Slovak Rarities Committee, Trnava, Slovakia.
3 Summarise information on population size, trends and distribution (if known):
Seldom and extremely rare occurrence during the spring and autumn migration
7
4 Indicate (with an ‘X’) and briefly describe any activities that have been carried out in favour of this species in thereporting period. (Please provide the title of the project and contact details, where available.)
Contact person: Jozef Chavko, Birds of Prey and Owls Research and Conservation Group (SVODAS), Hanulova5/D, 844 40 Bratislava, Slovakia
Research
Monitoring – Members of the SVODAS during their other monitoring activities have made some records of thespecies.
Habitat protection
Habitat restoration
Other
5 If no activities have been carried out for this species in the reporting period, what has prevented such action being taken?
Exclusively rare occuring species, protection is restricted only to migration period
6 Describe any future activities that are planned for this species:
Monitoring of migration occurrence
SpeciesAquila heliaca– Common Name(s) Imperial Eagle
1 Is your country a Range State for this species? Yes No
2 Please provide published distributionreference:
HUDEC, K.,ČERNÝ, W. et al. 1977. Fauna of the Czech and Slovak Socialistic Republic. Birds 2. Academia, Prague,Czechoslovak Socialistic Republic: 127-135. (in Czech)
TRNKA, A. 1997. Current List of Birds of Slovakia. Trnava University for Slovak Rarities Committee, Trnava, Slovakia.
DANKO, Š. et al. 1964. BUTEO Vol. 6, Slovakia. (in Slovak)
3 Summarise information on population size, trends and distribution (if known):
Slovak population currently (year 2002) comprises of approximately 40 breeding pairs, trend of the population size isslightly increasing, especially in Eastern Slovakia
4 Indicate (with an ‘X’) and briefly describe any activities that have been carried out in favour of this species in thereporting period. (Please provide the title of the project and contact details, where available.)
Contact persons: Jozef Chavko & Štefan Danko, Birds of Prey and Owls Research and Conservation Group(SVODAS), Hanulova 5/D, 844 40 Bratislava, Slovakia
Research – monitoring of population dynamics, human impacts, food requirements, habitat requirements, etc.
Monitoring – population monitoring throughout Slovakia; almost the entire population is being monitored bySVODAS in cooperation with the State Nature Conservancy of the Slovak Republic.
Habitat protection – guidance of the forestry activities through the negotiation on Forest Management Plans,individual actions on habitat protection.
Habitat restoration – restoration of feeding grounds in the framework of theSpermophilus citellusRestitutionProgramme
Other – nest improvements, nest watching, habitat photo-documentation
5 If no activities have been carried out for this species in the reporting period, what has prevented such action being taken?
Lack of financial sources decreased the opportunities of species protection and management.
6 Describe any future activities that are planned for this species:
- Regular and consistent monitoring of population, especially breeding population
- Monitoring of the population dynamic and trends
- Monitoring of human impact
- Elimination of adverse anthropogenic influence
- Restitution of food sources – restitution of prey species
- Protection of nests against robbers
- Protection and management of the nesting sites in accordance with the Recovery Plan, Action Plan for
8
Implementation of the National Biodiversity Strategy, requirements of the international treaties etc.
- Daily species protection, fixing of the nests damaged by wind, saving of the youngs endangered by kainism andpossible wounds etc.
- Awareness campaign among hunters for prevention of illegal shooting and poisoning of the eagles.
- Implementation of the project of 22 kV electric wires adaptation to prevent the species from accidental wounds andkills
SpeciesAnser erythropus– Common Name(s) Lesser White-fronted Goose
1 Is your country a Range State for this species? Yes No
2 Please provide published distributionreference:
DANKO, Š. 1995. Waterfowl and water-related birds of Senné –Iňačovce (Eastern Slovakia) fishpond area during 1975 –1994. Tichodroma Vol. 8, Bratislava, Slovakia: 22 – 47. (in Slovak)
HUDEC, K. et al. 1994. Fauna of the Czech Republic and the Slovak Republic. Birds 1. Academia, Prague, CzechRepublic. (in Czech)
KALIVODOVÁ , E., DAROLOVÁ, A. 1998. Birds of Slovak Section of the Danube and Žitný ostrov. Edition Biosphere, Serieof scientific literature Vol. A1, Bratislava, Slovakia. (in Slovak)
Group of authors, 2002. Atlas of the Distribution of Birds in Slovakia (in press).
TRNKA, A. 1997. Current List of Birds of Slovakia. Trnava University for Slovak Rarities Committee, Trnava, Slovakia.
3 Summarise information on population size, trends and distribution (if known):
Occurrence of the species in Slovakia is evaluated as rare, uncommon. There are older records from the DanubianLowland (1960ies, HUDEC et al., 1994). In Eastern Slovakia is also rare, recorded only several times inside the NationalNature Reserve Senne-fishponds and its surroundings (1970ies – 1980ies, DANKO, 1995).
TRNKA (1997) evaluates the species as rare visitor (vagrant), recorded in Slovakia only before 1990ies.
4 Indicate (with an ‘X’) and briefly describe any activities that have been carried out in favour of this species in thereporting period. (Please provide the title of the project and contact details, where available.)
Research
Monitoring – Since late 1990ies the winter waterfowl accounting is being organized by Society for Protection ofBirds in Slovakia (SOVS) –the BirdLife International partner (coordinator Jozef Ridzoň). Untill 1996 the wintermonitoring was organized by Dr. A. Darolová from the Zoological Institute of the Slovak Academy of Science inBratislava
Habitat protection
Habitat restoration
Other
5 If no activities have been carried out for this species in the reporting period, what has prevented such action being taken?
6 Describe any future activities that are planned for this species:
According to the character of occurrence of the species in Slovakia, no special activities are being planned for the future.
SpeciesAythya nyroca– Common Name(s) Ferruginous Pochard, Ferruginous Duck
1 Is your country a Range State for this species? Yes No
2 Please provide published distributionreference:
DANKO, Š. 1995. Waterfowl and water-related birds of Senné –Iňačovce (Eastern Slovakia) fishpond area during 1975 –1994. Tichodroma Vol. 8, Bratislava, Slovakia: 22 – 47. (in Slovak)
HUDEC, K. et al. 1994. Fauna of the Czech Republic and the Slovak Republic. Birds 1. Academia, Prague, CzechRepublic. (in Czech)
KALIVODOVÁ , E., DAROLOVÁ, A. 1998. Birds of Slovak Section of the Danube and Žitný ostrov. Edition Biosphere, Serieof scientific literature Vol. A1, Bratislava, Slovakia. (in Slovak)
9
Group of authors, 2002. Atlas of the Distribution of Birds in Slovakia (in press)
TRNKA, A. 1997. Current List of Birds of Slovakia. Trnava University for Slovak Rarities Committee, Trnava, Slovakia.
TRNKA, A., 1997. Ornithocenoses of the Pusté Úľany fish ponds – proposed protected site. Nature Conservation Vol 15,Slovak Environmental Agency, Centre of Nature and Landscape Protection Banská Bystrica, Slovakia: 175 – 182. (inSlovak)
3 Summarise information on population size, trends and distribution (if known):
TRNKA (1997) evaluates the species as breeding, and regular migrating and wintering species in the period 1990 –1997.Number of breeding pairs is estimated on 20 – 40, while the population trend within 1973 to 1994 is evaluated as“moderate decrease of population by 20 to 50 %“ – the statement is adopted from the MURIN et al. (1994).
In Western Slovakia the species bred near the Gabčíkovo a Číčov (HUDEC et al., 1994), KALIVODOVÁ et DAROLOVÁ
evaluate the species as rare and uncommon breeder of Danubian area. At the pr esent time (2000 – 2001) the species wasnot recorded as breeding in Western Slovakia (RÁC in verb.).
In Záhorie Lowland the species bred near Jakubovo (HUDEC et al., 1994), currently breeding of the species is not known.(JUREČEK in verb.). In Eastern Slovakia the species bred more frequently on several sites (Medzibodrožie, inundation areaof the Latorica river Senné-Iňačovce fishpond area and NNR Senné-fishponds (on the both last sites during 1970 – 19853-10 pairs bred annually), in Košice basin 4 -6 pairs bred annually (HUDEC, l.c.). DANKO (1995) evaluated the species inNNR Senné-fishponds and surrounding fishpond area as sporadically breeding in the number of 10 – 11 pairs (in 1975 –1994). Currently the breeding of the species in the same area is expected but exact number is not known (DANKO,KAŇUCH in verb.).
4 Indicate (with an ‘X’) and briefly describe any activities that have been carried out in favour of this species in thereporting period. (Please provide the title of the project and contact details, where available.)
Research
Monitoring - contact person: Samuel Pačenovský (SOVS), since 2001 also Jozef Lengyel, State Nature Conservancyof the Slovak Republic (SNC SR), Administration of the PLA Dunajské luhy
Habitat protection – protection and management of the Senné-fishponds NNR in cooperation of SNC SR and SOVS(coordinator of SOVS –Dr. Pavol Kaňuch)
Habitat restoration
Other
5 If no activities have been carried out for this species in the reporting period, what has prevented such action being taken?
6 Describe any future activities that are planned for this species:
Future activities will be concentrated on the monitoring and protection of historical and other suitable nesting sites.
SpeciesOtis tarda– Common Name(s) Great Bustard
1 Is your country a Range State for this species? Yes No
2 Please provide published distributionreference:
HUDEC, K.,ČERNÝ, W. et al. 1977. Fauna of the Czech and Slovak Socialistic Republic. Birds 2. Academia, Prague,Czechoslovak Socialistic Republic. (in Czech)
TRNKA, A. 1997. Current List of Birds of Slovakia. Trnava University for Slovak Rarities Committee, Trnava, Slovakia.
3 Summarise information on population size, trends and distribution (if known):
Currently the population of the Great Bustard in Slovakia is represented by 10 nesting hens, wintering populationcomprise of the specimens breeding in Hungary and Austria too, those visit Slovak territories in approximate number of100 specimens. Population in Slovakia is at the critical limit of extinction and it requires supernormal conservationmeasures.
10
4 Indicate (with an ‘X’) and briefly describe any activities that have been carried out in favour of this species in thereporting period. (Please provide the title of the project and contact details, where available.)Contact person for theconservation of the Great Bustard in Slovakia: Jozef Chavko, Štate Nature Conservancy of the Slovak Republic
Research - focused on human impact, influence of agricultural activities
Monitorin – regular monitoring within the species range in Slovakia
Habitat protection – guidance on inappropriate agricultural activities (airplane application of pesticides and nutrients,restriction of the isecticides use, guidance on production of inappropriate crops)
Habitat restoration – land rental and planting of native plant communities, restoration of native species of plants andanimals (insects, steppe species)
Other – protection against disturbance on nesting habitats, guidance on hunting, elimination of improper predators onnesting sites.
5 If no activities have been carried out for this species in the reporting period, what has prevented such action being taken?
In the period before year 2000 the habitat protection was not adequately ensured, and/or it was not oriented onestablishment and maintenance of basic habitat reguirements of the species - establishment of permanent wasteland plots.
6 Describe any future activities that are planned for this species:
- habitat protection - long-term land rental and establishment of the wasteland plots on key sites of the speciesoccurrence (nesting and display sites), conservation programme will require consecutive establishment of 2-3pertmanent wasteland plots (of steppe character) with the total area of app. 1000 to1500 ha inside the historicalrange of the species in Slovakia. The established plots will have function of the gene -pool areas for restoration ofthe steppe fauna and flora,
- establishment of the conservation regime to prevent the disturbance on key sites of the species occurence
- conservation and management of the nesting places in accordance to National Recovery Plan for the Great Bustard,Action Plan for the Implementation of the National Biodiversity Strategy, requirements of international treaties etc.
If you have information indicating that your country should be considered a Range State for any other bird species that islisted in CMS Appendix I, but which is not included in the tables above, please complete a table (provided below) for eachspecies.
Species name,Common Name(s):Acrocephalus paludicola, Aquatic Warbler
1 Please provide published distributionreference:
HUDECK., et al. 1983. Fauna of the Czech and Slovak Socialistic Republic. Birds 3/II. Academia, Prague, CzechoslovakSocialistic Republic. (in Czech)
TRNKA, A. 1997. Current List of Birds of Slovakia. Trnava University for Slovak Rarities Committee, Trnava, Slovakia.
2 Summarise information on population size, trends and distribution (if known):
In the 1970’s, the species has been registered as accidental breeder in the Eastern Slovakia (no estimations on populationsize has been done) and it has been observed regularly in a small number (up to 5 specimens) on migration in the WesternSlovakia as well. Since that time, no more regular registrations are available and in the Western Slovakia they are missingalmost at all. Until this time it is registered only occasionally on migration (1-2 specimens) and almost exclusively in theEastern Slovakia.
However, no special research and/or regular monitoring of the species have been provided, so it is expected, the species isa regular migrant in small number in Slovakia.
3 Indicate (with an ‘X’) and briefly describe any activities that have been carried out in favour of this species in thereporting period. (Please provide the title of the project and contact details, where available.)
Research
Monitoring
Habitat protection
Habitat restoration
Other
4 If no activities have been carried out for this species in the reporting period, what has prevented such action being taken?
11
Especially due to a small number of specimens only occasionally registered in the country, no special efforts onmonitoring and/or habitat protection activities have been implemented.
5 Describe any future activities that are planned for this species:
There is an effort to monitor the occurrence of the species on appropriate localities especially in the Eastern Slovakia andto prove the regular/irregular migration and probably breeding of the species on these sites.
12
2. MARINE M AMMALS
2.1 General questions on Appendix I marine mammals
1 Identify the Ministry, agency/department, or organisation responsible for leading actions relating to Appendix I listedmarine mammals:
Ministry of Environment, Division of Nature and Landscape Protection
2 Is the taking of all Appendix I marine mammals prohibited by the national Yes Noimplementing legislation cited in Table I(a) (General Information)?
If other legislation is relevant, please provide details: Thus the Slovakia is not a range state for these species thelegislation prohibit the taking of all species listed in the appendices of international treaties for those Slovakia is acontracting party.
2a If the taking of Appendix I marine mammals is prohibited by law, have any exceptions Yes Nobeen granted to the prohibition?
If Yes, please provide details:
3 Identify any obstacles to migration that exist in relation to Appendix I marine mammals:
Slovakia is not a range state for marine mammals listed in Appendix I
3a What actions are being undertaken to overcome these obstacles?
3b What assistance, if any, does your country require in order to overcome these obstacles?
4 What actions have been taken to prevent, reduce or control factors that are endangering or are likely to further endangerspecies of marine mammal, including strictly controlling the introduction of, or controlling or eliminating, alreadyintroduced exotic species (Article III(4)(c))?
4a Describe any factors that may limit action being taken in this regard:
4b What assistance, if any, does your country require to overcome these factors?
2.2 Questions on specific Appendix I marine mammals
If you have information indicating that your country should be considered a Range State for any marine mammal speciesthat is listed in CMS Appendix I, please complete a table (provided below) for each species.
Species name,Common name(s):
1 Please provide published distributionreference:
2 Summarise information on population size, trends and distribution (if known):
3 Indicate (with an ‘X’) and briefly describe any activities that have been carried out in favour of this species in thereporting period. (Please provide the title of the project and contact details, where available.)
Research
Monitoring
Habitat protection
13
Habitat restoration
Other
4 If no activities have been carried out for this species in the reporting period, what has prevented such action being taken?
5 Describe any future activities that are planned for this species:
14
3 MARINE TURTLES
3.1 General questions on Appendix I marine turtles
1 Identify the Ministry, agency/department, or organisation responsible for leading actions relating to Appendix I listedmarine turtles:
Ministry of Environment, Division of Nature and Landscape Protection
2 Is the taking of all Appendix I marine turtles prohibited by the national implementing Yes Nolegislation cited in Table I(a) (General Information)?
If other legislation is relevant, please provide details: Thus the Slovakia is not a range state for these species thelegislation prohibit the taking of all species listed in the appendices of international treaties for those Slovakia is acontracting party.
2a If the taking of Appendix I marine turtles is prohibited by law, have any exceptions Yes Nobeen granted to the prohibition?
If Yes, please provide details:
3 Identify any obstacles to migration that exist in relation to Appendix I marine turtles:
Slovakia is not range state for marine turtles listed in Appendix I
3a What actions are being undertaken to overcome these obstacles?
3b What assistance, if any, does your country require in order to overcome these obstacles?
4 What actions have been taken to prevent, reduce or control factors that are endangering or are likely to further endangerspecies of marine turtles, including strictly controlling the introduction of, or controlling or eliminating, alreadyintroduced exotic species (Article III(4)(c))?
4a Describe any factors that may limit action being taken in this regard:
4b What assistance, if any, does your country require to overcome these factors?
3.2 Questions on specific Appendix I marine turtles
If you have information indicating that your country should be considered a Range State for any marine turtle speciesthat is listed in CMS Appendix I, please complete a table (provided below) for each species.
Species name,Common name(s):
1 Please provide published distributionreference:
2 Summarise information on population size, trends and distribution (if known):
3 Indicate (with an ‘X’) and briefly describe any activities that have been carried out in favour of this species in thereporting period. (Please provide the title of the project and contact details, where available):
Research
Monitoring
Habitat protection
15
Habitat restoration
Other
4 If no activities have been carried out for this species in the reporting period, what has prevented such action being taken?
5 Describe any future activities that are planned for this species?
16
4 TERRESTRIAL M AMMALS (OTHER THAN BATS )
4.1 General questions on Appendix I terrestrial mammals (other than bats)
1 Identify the Ministry, agency/department, or organisation responsible for leading actions relating to Appendix I listedterrestrial mammals (other than bats):
Ministry of Environment, Division of Nature and Landscape Protection
2 Is the taking of all Appendix I terrestrial mammals (other than bats) prohibited by Yes Nothe national implementing legislation cited in Table I(a) (General Information)?
If other legislation is relevant, please provide details: Thus the Slovakia is not a range state for these species thelegislation prohibit the taking of all species listed in the appendices of international treaties for those Slovakia is acontracting party.
2a If the taking of Appendix I terrestrial mammals (other than bats) is prohibited by Yes Nolaw, have any exceptions been granted to the prohibition?
If Yes, please provide details:
3 Identify any obstacles to migration that exist in relation to Appendix I terrestrial mammals (other than bats):
Slovakia is not a range state for mammal species listed in Appendix I
3a What actions are being undertaken to overcome these obstacles?
3b What assistance, if any, does your country require in order to overcome these obstacles?
4 What actions have been taken to prevent, reduce or control factors that are endangering or are likely to further endangerspecies of terrestrial mammal (other than bats), including strictly controlling the introduction of, or controlling oreliminating, already introduced exotic species (Article III(4)(c))?
4a Describe any factors which limit action being taken in this regard:
4b What assistance, if any, does your country require to overcome these factors?
4.2 Questions on specific Appendix I terrestrial mammals (other than bats)
If you have information indicating that your country should be considered a Range State for any terrestrial mammalspecies (other than bats) that is listed in CMS Appendix I , please complete a table (provided below) for each species.
Species name,Common name(s):
1 Please provide published distributionreference:
2 Summarise information on population size, trends and distribution (if known):
3 Indicate (with an ‘X’) and briefly describe any activities that have been carried out in favour of this species in thereporting period. (Please provide the title of the project and contact details, where available.)
Research
Monitoring
17
Habitat protection
Habitat restoration
Other
4 If no activities have been carried out for this species in the reporting period, what has prevented such action being taken?
5 Describe any future activities that are planned for this species:
18
5 BATS
5.1 General questions on Appendix I bats
1 Identify the Ministry, agency/department, or organisation responsible for leading actions relating to Appendix I listedbats:
Ministry of Environment, Division of Nature and Landscape Protection
2 Is the taking of all Appendix I bats prohibited by the national implementing Yes NoLegislation cited in Table I(a) (General Information)?
If other legislation is relevant, please provide details: Thus the Slovakia is not a range state for these species thelegislation prohibit the taking of all species listed in the appendices of international treaties for those Slovakia is acontracting party.
2a If the taking of Appendix I bats is prohibited by law, have any exceptions Yes NoBeen granted to the prohibition?
If Yes, please provide details:
3 Identify any obstacles to migration that exist in relation to Appendix I bats:
Slovakia is not a range state for bat species listed in Appendix I
3a What actions are being undertaken to overcome these obstacles?
3b What assistance, if any, does your country require in order to overcome these obstacles?
4 What actions have been taken to prevent, reduce or control factors that are endangering or are likely to further endangerspecies of bats, including strictly controlling the introduction of, or controlling or eliminating, already introduced exoticspecies (Article III(4)(c))?
4a Describe any factors that may limit action being taken in this regard:
4b What assistance, if any, does your country require to overcome these factors?
5.2 Questions on specific Appendix I bat species
If you have information indicating that your country should be considered a Range State for any bat species that is listedin CMS Appendix I, please complete a table (provided below) for each species.
Species name,Common name(s):
1 Please provide published distributionreference:
2 Summarise information on population size, trends and distribution (if known):
3 Indicate (with an ‘X’) and briefly describe any activities that have been carried out in favour of this species in thereporting period. (Please provide the title of the project and contact details, where available):
Research
Monitoring
Habitat protection
19
Habitat restoration
Other
4 If no activities have been carried out for this species in the reporting period, what has prevented such action being taken?
5 Describe any future activities that are planned for this species?
20
6 OTHER TAXA
6.1 General questions on Appendix I species belonging to other taxa
1 Identify the Ministry, agency/department, or organisation responsible for leading actions relating to Appendix I listedspecies belonging to taxa not included in sections 1-5 above:
Ministry of Environment, Division of Nature and Landscape Protection
2 Is the taking of all Appendix I species belonging to taxa not included in Yes Nosections 1-5 above, prohibited by the national legislation listed as beingimplementing legislation in Table I(a) (General Information)?
If other legislation is relevant, please provide details: Thus the Slovakia is not a range state for these species thelegislation prohibit the taking of all species listed in the appendices of international treaties for those Slovakia is acontracting party.
2a If the taking of Appendix I species belonging to taxa not included in Yes Nosections 1-5 above is prohibited by law, have any exceptions beengranted to the prohibition?
If Yes, please provide details:
3 Identify any obstacles to migration that exist in relation to Appendix I species belonging to taxa not included in sections1-5 above:
Slovakia is not a range state for these species
3a What actions are being undertaken to overcome these obstacles?
3b What assistance, if any, does your country require in order to overcome these obstacles?
4 What actions have been taken to prevent, reduce or control factors that are endangering or are likely to further endangerspecies belonging to taxa not included in section 1-5 above, including strictly controlling the introduction of, orcontrolling or eliminating, already introduced exotic species (Article III(4)(c))?
4a Describe any factors that may limit action being taken in this regard:
4b What assistance, if any, does your country require to overcome these factors?
6.2 Questions on specific Appendix I species belonging to other taxa
If you have information indicating that your country should be considered a Range State for any Appendix I listed speciesthat belongs to taxa not included in sections 1-5 above, please complete a table (provided below) for each species.
Species name,Common name(s):
1 Please provide published distributionreference:
2 Summarise information on population size, trends and distribution (if known):
3 Indicate (with an ‘X’) and briefly describe any activities that have been carried out in favour of this species in thereporting period. (Please provide the title of the project and contact details, where available):
Research
21
Monitoring
Habitat protection
Habitat restoration
Other
4 If no activities have been carried out for this species in the reporting period, what has prevented such action being taken?
5 Describe any future activities that are planned for this species?
7 LISTING OF OTHER ENDANGERED MIGRATORY SPECIES IN APPENDIX I
1 Is your country a Range State for any other endangered migratory species Yes No
not currently listed in Appendix I?
If Yes, please provide details:
1a Is your country taking any steps to propose listing any of these species? Yes No
If Yes, please provide details:
1b What assistance, if any, does your country require to initiate the listing of these species?
22
III. Appendix II Species
1. INFORMATION ON APPENDIX II SPECIES
Information pertaining to the conservation of Appendix II species that are the object of CMS Agreements will have b eenprovided in periodic Party reports to those instruments. It will suffice therefore to reference (below), and preferablyappend, a copy of the latest report that has been submitted to the secretariat each of the Agreement/MoUs to which yourcountry is a Party.
GREAT BUSTARD MoU (2001)
Date of last report: - Period covered:
EUROBATS (1994)
Date of last report: 2001 Period covered: 2001
AEWA (1999)
Date of last report: - Period covered:
2. QUESTIONS ON CMS AGREEMENTS
2.1 Questions on CMS Agreements relating to birds
1 In the current reporting period, has your countryinitiated the development of any Yes NoCMS Agreements, including Memoranda of Understanding, to address theConservation needs of Appendix II bird species?
If Yes, what is the current state of development?
2 In the current reporting period, has your countryparticipated in the development Yes NoOf any CMS Agreements, including Memoranda of Understanding, which addressThe conservation needs of Appendix II bird species?
If Yes, please provide details:
3 If your country has initiated or is participating in the development of an Agreement or Memorandum of Understanding,what assistance, if any, does your country require in order to initiate or participate in the instrument’s development?
4 Is the development of any CMS Agreement for birds, including Memorandum of Yes NoUnderstanding, planned by your country in the foreseeable future?
If Yes, please provide details:
2.2 Questions on CMS Agreements relating to marine mammals
1 In the current reporting period, has your countryinitiated the development of any Yes NoCMS Agreements, including Memoranda of Understanding, to address theConservation needs of Appendix II marine mammal species?
If Yes, what is the current state of development?
2 In the current reporting period, has your countryparticipated in the development Yes NoOf any CMS Agreements, including Memoranda of Understanding, which addressThe conservation needs of Appendix II marine mammal species?
If Yes, please provide details:
3 If your country has initiated or is participating in the development of an Agreement or Memorandum of Understanding,what assistance, if any, does your country require in order to initiate or participate in the instrument’s development?
23
4 Is the development of any CMS Agreement for marine mammals, including Yes NoMemorandum of Understanding, planned by your country in the foreseeable future?
If Yes, please provide details:
2.3 Questions on CMS Agreements relating to marine turtles
1 In the current reporting period, has your countryinitiated the development of any Yes NoCMS Agreements, including Memoranda of Understanding, to address theConservation needs of Appendix II marine turtles?
If Yes, what is the current state of development?
2 In the current reporting period, has your countryparticipated in the development Yes NoOf any CMS Agreements, including Memoranda of Understanding, which addressThe conservation needs of Appendix II marine turtles?
If Yes, please provide details:
3 If your country has initiated or is participating in the development of an Agreement or Memorandum of Understanding,what assistance, if any, does your country require in order to initiate or participate in the instrument’s development?
4 Is the development of any CMS Agreement for marine turtles, including Yes NoMemorandum of Understanding, planned by your country in the foreseeable future?
If Yes, please provide details:
2.4 Questions on CMS Agreements relating to terrestrial mammals (other than bats)
1 In the current reporting period, has your countryinitiated the development of any Yes NoCMS Agreements, including Memoranda of Understanding, to address the conservationNeeds of Appendix II terrestrial mammal species (other than bats)?
If Yes, what is the current state of development?
2 In the current reporting period, has your countryparticipated in the development Yes NoOf any CMS Agreements, including Memoranda of Understanding, which addressThe conservation needs of Appendix II terrestrial mammal species (other than bat s)?
If Yes, please provide details:
3 If your country has initiated or is participating in the development of an Agreement or Memorandum of Understanding,what assistance, if any, does your country require in order to initiate or participate in the instrument’s development?
4 Is the development of any CMS Agreement for terrestrial mammals (other than bats), Yes NoIncluding Memorandum of Understanding, planned by your country in the foreseeable future?
If Yes, please provide details:
2.5 Questions on CMS Agreements relating to bats
1 In the current reporting period, has your countryinitiated the development of any Yes NoCMS Agreements, including Memoranda of Understanding, to address theconservation needs of Appendix II bat species?
If Yes, what is the current state of development?
2 In the current reporting period, has your countryparticipated in the development Yes Noof any CMS Agreements, including Memoranda of Understanding, which addressthe conservation needs of Appendix II bat species?
If Yes, please provide details:
3 If your country has initiated or is participating in the development of an Agreement or Memorandum of Understanding,what assistance, if any, does your country require in order to initiate or participate in the instrument’s development?
24
4 Is the development of any CMS Agreement for bats, including Memorandum of Yes NoUnderstanding, planned by your country in the future?
If Yes, please provide details:
2.6 Questions on CMS Agreements relating to other taxa
1 In the current reporting period, has your countryinitiated the development of any Yes NoCMS Agreements, including Memoranda of Understanding, to address theconservation needs of Appendix II species belonging to taxa notincluded in sections 1-6 above?
If Yes, what is the current state of development?
2 In the current reporting period, has your countryparticipated in the development Yes Noof any CMS Agreements, including Memoranda of Understanding, which addressthe conservation needs of species belonging to taxa not included in sections 1-6 above?
If Yes, please provide details:
3 If your country has initiated or is participating in the development of an Agreement or Memorandum of Understanding,what assistance, if any, does your country require in order to initiate or participate in the instrument’s development?
4 Is the development of any CMS Agreement for other taxa, including Memorandum of Yes NoUnderstanding, planned by your country in the foreseeable future?
If Yes, please provide details:
3. LISTING OF MIGRATORY SPECIES IN APPENDIX II
1 Is your country a Range State for any migratory species that has an unfavourable Yes Noconservation status, but is notcurrently listed in Appendix II and could benefitfrom the conclusion of an Agreement for its conservation?
If Yes, please provide details:
1a Is your country taking any steps to propose the listing of this/these species in Appendix II? Yes No
If Yes, please provide details:
1b What assistance, if any, does your country require to initiate the listing of this/these species?
25
IV. National and Regional Priorities
1 Does the conservation of migratory species currently feature in any national Yes Noor regional policies/plans (apart from CMS Agreements)
If Yes, please provide details:
1a Do these policies/plans cover the following areas (if yes, please provide details):
Yes No
Economic development
Land-use planning
Designation and development of reserves
Development of ecological networks
Planning of powerlines
Planning of fences
Planning of dams
Other
V. Policies on Satellite Telemetry
1 In the current reporting period, has your country undertaken Yes Noconservation/research projects that use satellite telemetry?
If Yes, please provide details (Indicate inter alia the scientific justification for the research, describe briefly the measurestaken to ensure that risks to the welfare of individual animals and – in the case of severely depleted populations – to thespecies are minimised, and summarise the results obtained):
2 Are any future conservation/research projects planned that will use Yes Nosatellite telemetry?
If Yes, please provide details (including the expected timeframe for these projects):
If No, please explain any impediments or requirements in this regard:
VI. Membership
1 Have actions been taken by your country to encourage non-Parties Yes Noto join CMS and its related Agreements?
If Yes, please provide details. (In particular, describe actions taken to recruit the non-Parties that have been identified bythe Standing Committee as high priorities for recruitment.)
1a Identify the agency, department or organization responsible for leading on this action in your country:
26
VII. Global and National Importance of CMS
1 Have actions been taken by your country to increase national, regional Yes Noand/or global awareness of the relevance of CMS and its global importancein the context of biodiversity conservation?
If Yes, please provide details:
2 Identify the agency, department or organization responsible for leading on this action in your country:
VIII. Mobilization of Resources
1 Has your country made financial resources available for conservation activities having Yes Nodirect benefits for migratory species in your country?
If Yes, please provide details:
Project “Death poles” aimed at preventing birds from electrocution on electric poles of the external 22 kV power lines inSlovakia, gradual ecologization of 22 kV power lines.
Project “Protection of the imperial eagle” & implementation of National Action Plan for Imperial Eagle aimed at regularmonitoring of the population, regulation of the forest management plans in order to avoid wood logging in regular nestinghabitats, documentation of occurrence of the species during breeding, migration and winter season.
Project “Conservation of Golden Eagle in the Carpathian region” aimed at monitoring of the breeding occurrence,guarding of the nest during breeding season.
Project “Re-establishing of the Great Bustard population in border region with Austria and Hungary” – trilateral projectaimed at the sustainable use of land in breeding habitats of Great Bustard.
Project “Ciconia” aimed at monitoring of the breeding population of White Stork in Slovakia.
Project aimed at the supporting of nesting habitats of peregrine and saker falcons.
Implementation of National Action Plan for Corncrake (Crex crex).
Implementation of National Action Plan for Great Bustard (Otis tarda).
2 Has your country made voluntary contributions to the CMS Trust Fund to support Yes Norequests from developing countries and countries with economies in transition?
If Yes, please provide details:
3 Has your country made other voluntary financial contributions to support Yes Noconservation activities having direct benefits for migratory species in othercountries (particularly developing countries)?
If Yes, please provide details:
4 Has your country provided technical and/or scientific assistance to Yes Nodeveloping countries to facilitate initiatives for the benefit of migratoryspecies?
If Yes, please provide details:
Zoological Garden Bratislava, Slovakia participate in Reintroduction Project of Scimatar-horned Oryx to Sidi TouiNational Park, Tunisia
5 Has your country received financial assistance/support from the CMS Trust Yes NoFund, via the CMS Secretariat, for national conservation activities havingdirect benefits for migratory species in your country?
If Yes, please provide details:
6 Has your country received financial assistance/support from sources other Yes Nothan the CMS Secretariat for conservation activities having direct benefit formigratory species in your country?
If Yes, please provide details:
GEF; REC Budapest; Wetlands International; Program PIN MATRA; PHARE, British Embassy, Know How Found;
Ramsar Small Grants Fund,
27
IX. Implementation of COP Resolutions and Recommendations
Please summarize the measures undertaken by your country to impleme nt the substantive, operational Resolutions andRecommendations adopted by the Conference of the Parties, where these have not been mentioned elsewhere in thisreport, giving particular emphasis to those adopted by at the Sixth Meeting (Cape Town, November 1999).
Resolution 6.1. – Concerted Actions for Appendix I species
Slovak republic is a Range State for the only one Appendix I species according to resolution 3.2,4.2, 5.1 and 6.1. - (Otis tarda)for which concerted actions should be undertaken.
Trilateral project aimed at the recovery of Great Bustard population in border region (Austria, Hungary), as well as aimed at thepropagation of environmental friendly methods in agriculture and land use.
Resolution 6.4. – Strategic plan for the CMS
Main objectives and the relevant operational objectives of the Strategic Plan of CMS for 2000 –2005 have been incorporated into the Action Plan for implementation of National Biodiversity Conservation Strategy, as well as in to the National Action Planfor implementation of Ramsar Strategic Plan.
Other remarks:
28
Annex: Questions on specific Appendix II species
The tables below contain the list of all species listed in Appendix II. Boxes have been checked to indicatethe species for which your country is considered to be a Range State. Please amend the boxes whereappropriate. (If you wish to provide further information on any of these species, please attach as anannex.) Please also provide published distribution references where available.
Species RangeState
Not aRange State
Extinct Noinformation
available
Published distributionreference
CHIROPTERA
Rhinolophus ferrumequinum
(only European populations)
UHRIN et al. (1996)
Rhinolophus hipposideros
(only European populations)
UHRIN et al. (1996)
Rhinolophus euryale
(only European populations)
UHRIN et al. (1996)
Rhinolophus mehelyi
(only European populations)
Rhinolophus blasii
(only European populations)
Myotis bechsteini
(only European populations)
DANKO et MIHÓK (1989)HORÁČEK et al. (1995)
Myotis blythi
(only European populations)
DANKO et MIHÓK (1989)
Myotis brandtii
(only European populations)
DANKO et MIHÓK (1989)HORÁČEK et al. (1995)
Myotis capaccinii
(only European populations)
Myotis dasycneme
(only European populations)
UHRIN et al. (1995)HORÁČEK et HANÁK (1989)MATIS et al. (2000)
Myotis daubentoni
(only European populations)
UHRIN et al. (1995)
Myotis emarginatus
(only European populations)
DANKO et MIHÓK (1989)HORÁČEK et al. (1995)
Myotis myotis
(only European populations)
DANKO et MIHÓK (1989)HORÁČEK et al. (1995)
Myotis mystacinus
(only European populations)
DANKO et MIHÓK (1989)HORÁČEK et al. (1995)
Myotis nattereri
(only European populations)
DANKO et MIHÓK (1989)HORÁČEK et al. (1995)
Pipistrellus kuhli
(only European populations)
Pipistrellus nathusii
(only European populations)
DANKO et MIHÓK (1989)HORÁČEK et al. (1995)
29
Species RangeState
Not aRange State
Extinct Noinformation
available
Published distributionreference
Pipistrellus pipistrellus
(only European populations)
DANKO et MIHÓK (1989)HORÁČEK et al. (1995)
Pipistrellus savii
(only European populations)
Nyctalus lasiopterus
(only European populations)
DANKO (1974)
Nyctalus leisleri
(only European populations)
DANKO et MIHÓK (1989)HORÁČEK et al. (1995)
Nyctalus noctula
(only European populations)
DANKO et MIHÓK (1989)HORÁČEK et al. (1995)
Eptesicus nilssonii
(only European populations)
DANKO et MIHÓK (1989)HORÁČEK et al. (1995)
Eptesicus serotinus
(only European populations)
DANKO et MIHÓK (1989)HORÁČEK et al. (1995)
Vespertilio murinus
(only European populations)
DANKO et MIHÓK (1989)HORÁČEK et al. (1995)
Barbastella barbastellus
(only European populations)
DANKO et MIHÓK (1989)HORÁČEK et al. (1995)
Plecotus auritus
(only European populations)
DANKO et MIHÓK (1989)HORÁČEK et al. (1995)
Plecotus austriacus
(only European populations)
DANKO et MIHÓK (1989)HORÁČEK et al. (1995)
Miniopterus schreibersii
(only European populations)
UHRIN et al. (1997)
Tadarida teniotis
CETACEA
Platanista gangeticagangetica
Pontoporia blainvillei
Inia geoffrensis
Delphinapterus leucas
Monodon monoceros
Phocoena phocoena
(North and Baltic Sea populations)
Phocoena phocoena
(western North Atlantic population)
Phocoena phocoena
(Black Sea population)
Neophocaena phocaenoides
Phocoenoides dalli
Phocoena spinipinnis
Phocoena dioptrica
30
Species RangeState
Not aRange State
Extinct Noinformation
available
Published distributionreference
Sousa chinensis
Sousa teuszii
Sotalia fluviatilis
Lagenorhynchus albirostris
(only North and Baltic Seapopulations)
Lagenorhynchus acutus
(only North and Baltic Seapopulations)
Lagenorhynchus australis
Lagenorhynchus obscurus
Grampus griseus
(only North and Baltic Seapopulations)
Tursiops aduncus
(Arafura/Timor Sea populations)
Tursiops truncatus
(North and Baltic Sea populations)
Tursiops truncatus
(western Mediterraneanpopulation)
Tursiops truncatus
(Black Sea population)
Stenella attenuata
(eastern tropical Pacific population)
Stenella attenuata
(Southeast Asian populations)
Stenella longirostris
(eastern tropical Pacificpopulations)
Stenella longirostris
(Southeast Asian populations)
Stenella coeruleoalba
(eastern tropical Pacific population)
Stenella coeruleoalba
(western Mediterraneanpopulation)
Delphinus delphis
(North and Baltic Sea populations)
Delphinus delphis
(western Mediterraneanpopulation)
Delphinus delphis
(Black Sea population)
31
Species RangeState
Not aRange State
Extinct Noinformation
available
Published distributionreference
Delphinus delphis
(eastern tropical Pacific population)
Lagenodelphis hosei
(Southeast Asian populations)
Orcaella brevirostris
Cephalorhynchuscommersonii
(South American population)
Cephalorhynchus eutropia
Cephalorhynchus heavisidii
Orcinus orca
(eastern North Atlantic population)
Orcinus orca
(eastern North Pacific population)
Globicephala melas
(only North and Baltic Seapopulations)
Berardius bairdii
Hyperoodon ampullatus
PINNIPEDIA
Phoca vitulina
(only Baltic and Wadden Seapopulations)
Halichoerus grypus
(only Baltic Sea populations)
Monachus monachus
PROBOSCIDEA
Loxodonta africana
SIRENIA
Trichechus manatus
Dugong dugon
ARTIODACTYLA
Vicugna vicugna
Oryx dammah
Gazella gazella
GAVIIFORMES
Gavia stellata
(Western Palearctic populations)
ReM, ReW according to TRNKA
(1997)
Gavia arctica arctica ReM, ReW according to TRNKA
(1997)
Gavia arctica suschkini
Gavia immer immer
(Northwest European population)
RaM, RaW according to TRNKA
(1997)
32
Species RangeState
Not aRange State
Extinct Noinformation
available
Published distributionreference
Gavia adamsii
(Western Palearctic population)
PODICIPEDIFORMES
Podiceps grisegenagrisegena
ReB, ReM, RaW according toTRNKA (1997)
Podiceps auritus
(Western Palearctic populations)
RaM, RaW according to TRNKA
(1997)
PELECANIFORMES
Phalacrocorax nigrogularis
Phalacrocorax pygmeus AcB, AcV? according to TRNKA
(1997)
Pelecanus onocrotalus
(Western Palearctic populations)
AcV according to TRNKA (1997)
Pelecanus crispus [AcV] according to TRNKA (1997)
CICONIIFORMES
Botaurus stellaris stellaris
(Western Palearctic populations)
ReB, ReM, ReW according toTRNKA (1997)
Ixobrychus minutus minutus
(Western Palearctic populations)
ReB, ReM, [AcW] according toTRNKA (1997)
Ixobrychus sturmii
Ardeola rufiventris
Ardeola idae
Egretta vinaceigula
Casmerodius albus albus
(Western Palearctic populations)
ReB, ReV, ReW according toTRNKA (1997)
Ardea purpurea purpurea
(populations breeding in theWestern Palearctic)
ReB, ReM, [AcW] according toTRNKA (1997)
Mycteria ibis
Ciconia nigra ReB, ReM, [AcW] according toTRNKA (1997)
Ciconia episcopusmicroscelis
Ciconia ciconia ReB, ReM, AcW according toTRNKA (1997)
Plegadis falcinellus ReV according to TRNKA (1997)
Geronticus eremita
Threskiornis aethiopicusaethiopicus
Platalea alba
(excluding Malagasy population)
Platalea leucorodia RaB, ReV according to TRNKA
(1997)
Phoenicopterus ruber
33
Species RangeState
Not aRange State
Extinct Noinformation
available
Published distributionreference
Phoenicopterus minor
ANSERIFORMES
Dendrocygna bicolor
Dendrocygna viduata
Thalassornis leuconotus
Oxyura leucocephala
Cygnus olor ReB, ReW according to TRNKA
(1997)
Cygnus cygnus ReM, ReW according to TRNKA
(1997)
Cygnus columbianus AcV according to TRNKA (1997)
Anser brachyrhynchus AcV according to TRNKA (1997)
Anser fabalis ReM, RaV, ReW according toTRNKA (1997)
Anser albifrons ReM, [AcV], ReW according toTRNKA (1997)
Anser erythropus [RaV] according to TRNKA (1997)
Anser anser ReB, ReM, ReW according toTRNKA (1997)
Branta leucopsis
Branta bernicla
Branta ruficollis
Alopochen aegyptiacus
Tadorna ferruginea
Tadorna cana
Tadorna tadorna RaM, RaW according to TRNKA
(1997)
Plectropterus gambensis
Sarkidiornis melanotos
Nettapus auritus
Anas penelope ReM, ReW according to TRNKA
(1997)
Anas strepera ReB, ReM, ReW according toTRNKA (1997)
Anas crecca ReB, ReM, ReW according toTRNKA (1997)
Anas capensis
Anas platyrhynchos ReB, ReM, ReW according toTRNKA (1997)
Anas undulata
Anas acuta RaB, ReM, ReW according toTRNKA (1997)
Anas erythrorhyncha
34
Species RangeState
Not aRange State
Extinct Noinformation
available
Published distributionreference
Anas hottentota
Anas querquedula ReB, ReM, RaW according toTRNKA (1997)
Anas clypeata ReB, ReM, RaW according toTRNKA (1997)
Marmaronettaangustirostris
Netta rufina ReB, ReM, [AcW] according toTRNKA (1997)
Netta erythrophthalma
Aythya ferina ReB, ReM, ReW according toTRNKA (1997)
Aythya nyroca ReB, ReM, ReW according toTRNKA (1997)
Aythya fuligula ReB, ReM, ReW according toTRNKA (1997)
Aythya marila ReM, RaW according to TRNKA
(1997)
Somateria mollissima RaM, RaW according to TRNKA
(1997)
Somateria spectabilis
Polysticta stelleri
Clangula hyemalis RaM, RaW according to TRNKA
(1997)
Melanitta nigra ReM, RaW according to TRNKA
(1997)
Melanitta fusca ReM, RaW according to TRNKA
(1997)
Bucephala clangula ReM, ReW according to TRNKA
(1997)
Mergellus albellus ReM, ReW according to TRNKA
(1997)
Mergus serrator ReM, RaW according to TRNKA
(1997)
Mergus merganser ReM, ReW according to TRNKA
(1997)
FALCONIFORMES
Pandion haliaetus ReM, AcW? according to TRNKA
(1997)
GALLIFORMES
Coturnix coturnix coturnix ReB, ReM, [AcW] according toTRNKA (1997)
SPHENISCIFORMES
Spheniscus demersus
PROCELLARIIFORMES
Diomedea exulans
35
Species RangeState
Not aRange State
Extinct Noinformation
available
Published distributionreference
Diomedea epomophora
Diomedea irrorata
Diomedea nigripes
Diomedea immutabilis
Diomedea melanophris
Diomedea bulleri
Diomedea cauta
Diomedea chlororhynchos
Diomedea chrysostoma
Phoebetria fusca
Phoebetria palpebrata
Macronectes giganteus
Macronectes halli
Procellaria cinerea
Procellaria aequinoctialis
Procellaria aequinoctialisconspicillata
Procellaria parkinsoni
Procellaria westlandica
GRUIFORMES
Porzana porzana
(populations breeding in theWestern Palearctic)
ReB, ReM, [AcW] according toTRNKA (1997)
Porzana parva parva ReB, ReM according to TRNKA
(1997)
Porzana pusilla intermedia [AcV] according to TRNKA (1997)
Fulica atra atra
(Mediterranean and Black Seapopulations)
Aenigmatolimnasmarginalis
Sarothrura boehmi
Sarothrura ayresi
Crex crex ReB, ReM according to TRNKA
(1997)
Grus leucogeranus
Grus virgo (Syn.Anthropoides virgo)
[AcV] according to TRNKA (1997)
Grus paradisea
Grus carunculatus
Grus grus ReM according to TRNKA (1997)
Chlamydotis undulata
(only Asian populations)
36
Species RangeState
Not aRange State
Extinct Noinformation
available
Published distributionreference
Otis tarda ReB, ReW according to TRNKA
(1997)
CHARADRIIFORMES
Himantopus himantopus RaB, RaV according to TRNKA
(1997)
Recurvirostra avosetta ReB, RaV according to TRNKA
(1997)
Dromas ardeola
Burhinus oedicnemus RaB, RaM according to TRNKA
(1997)
Glareola pratincola AcV according to TRNKA (1997)
Glareola nordmanni AcV according to TRNKA (1997)
Pluvialis apricaria ReM, [AcW] according to TRNKA
(1997)
Pluvialis squatarola ReM according to TRNKA (1997)
Charadrius hiaticula ReM according to TRNKA (1997)
Charadrius dubius ReB, ReM according to TRNKA
(1997)
Charadrius pecuarius
Charadrius tricollaris
Charadrius forbesi
Charadrius pallidus
Charadrius alexandrinus AcB, ReM, according to TRNKA
(1997) according to KRIŠTÍN et al.(1998) evaluated as DD
Charadrius marginatus
Charadrius mongulus
Charadrius leschenaultii
Charadrius asiaticus
Eudromias morinellus [RaM] according to TRNKA (1997)
Vanellus vanellus ReB, ReM, RaW according toTRNKA (1997)
Vanellus spinosus
Vanellus albiceps
Vanellus senegallus
Vanellus lugubris
Vanellus melanopterus
Vanellus coronatus
Vanellus superciliosus
Vanellus gregarius (SynChettusia gregaria)
Vanellus leucurus
Gallinago media RaM according to TRNKA (1997)
37
Species RangeState
Not aRange State
Extinct Noinformation
available
Published distributionreference
Gallinago gallinago ReB, ReM, ReW according toTRNKA (1997)
Lymnocryptes minimus ReM, RaW according to TRNKA
(1997)
Limosa limosa ReB, ReM according to TRNKA
(1997)
Limosa lapponica RaM according to TRNKA (1997)
Numenius phaeopus ReM according to TRNKA (1997)
Numenius tenuirostris
Numenius arquata ReB, ReM, RaW according toTRNKA (1997)
Tringa erythropus ReM according to TRNKA (1997)
Tringa totanus ReB, ReM, AcW according toTRNKA (1997)
Tringa stagnatilis ReM according to TRNKA (1997)
Tringa nebularia ReM, [AcW] according to TRNKA
(1997)
Tringa ochropus ReM, ReW according to TRNKA
(1997)
Tringa glareola ReM according to TRNKA (1997)
Tringa cinerea AcV according to TRNKA (1997)
Tringa hypoleucos ReB, ReM, RaW according toTRNKA (1997)
Arenaria interpres ReM according to TRNKA (1997)
Calidris tenuirostris
Calidris canutus RaM according to TRNKA (1997)
Calidris alba RaM according to TRNKA (1997)
Calidris minuta ReM according to TRNKA (1997)
Calidris temminckii ReM according to TRNKA (1997)
Calidris maritima
Calidris alpina ReM, [AcW] according to TRNKA
(1997)
Calidris ferruginea ReM according to TRNKA (1997)
Limicola falcinellus ReM according to TRNKA (1997)
Philomachus pugnax ReM according to TRNKA (1997)
Phalaropus lobatus ReM according to TRNKA (1997)
Phalaropus fulicaria
Larus hemprichii
Larus leucophthalmus
Larus ichthyaetus
(West Eurasian and Africanpopulation)
Larus melanocephalus AcB according to TRNKA (1997)
38
Species RangeState
Not aRange State
Extinct Noinformation
available
Published distributionreference
Larus genei
Larus audouinii
Larus armenicus
Sterna nilotica nilotica
(West Eurasian and Africanpopulations)
Sterna caspia
(West Eurasian and Africanpopulations)
ReM according to TRNKA (1997)
Sterna maxima albidorsalis
Sterna bergii
(African and Southwest Asianpopulations)
Sterna bengalensis
(African and Southwest Asianpopulations)
Sterna sandvicensissandvicensis
Sterna dougallii
(Atlantic population)
Sterna hirundo hirundo
(populations breeding in theWestern Palearctic)
ReB, ReM according to TRNKA
(1997)
Sterna paradisaea
(Atlantic populations)
Sterna albifrons RaB, ReM according to TRNKA
(1997)
Sterna saundersi
Sterna balaenarum
Sterna repressa
Chlidonias niger niger ReB, ReM according to TRNKA
(1997)
Chlidonias leucopterus
(West Eurasian and Africanpopulation)
[RaB] according to TRNKA (1997)
CORACIIFORMES
Merops apiaster ReB, ReM according to TRNKA
(1997)
Coracias garrulus ReB, ReM according to TRNKA
(1997)
PSITTACIFORMES
Amazona tucumana
PASSERIFORMES
Hirundo atrocaerulea
Acrocephalus paludicola [AcB], RaM according to TRNKA
(1997)
39
Species RangeState
Not aRange State
Extinct Noinformation
available
Published distributionreference
TESTUDINATA
Chelonia depressa
Chelonia mydas
Caretta caretta
Eretmochelys imbricata
Lepidochelys kempii
Lepidochelys olivacea
Dermochelys coriacea
Podocnemis expansa
CROCODYLIA
Crocodylus porosus
ACIPENSERIFORMES
Huso huso BARUŠ, OLIVA et al. (1995)
Huso dauricus
Acipenser baerii baicalensis
Acipenser fulvescens
Acipenser gueldenstaedtii BARUŠ, OLIVA et al. (1995)
Acipenser medirostris
Acipenser mikadoi
Acipenser naccarii
Acipenser nudiventris BARUŠ, OLIVA et al. (1995)
Acipenser persicus
Acipenser ruthenus
(Danube population)
BARUŠ, OLIVA et al. (1995)
Acipenser schrenckii
Acipenser sinensis
Acipenser stellatus BARUŠ, OLIVA et al. (1995)
Acipenser sturio
Pseudoscaphirhynchuskaufmanni
Pseudoscaphirhynchushermanni
Pseudoscaphirhynchusfedtschenkoi
Psephurus gladius
LEPIDOPTERA
Danaus plexippus
ORECTOLOBIFORMES
Rhincodon typus
40
All species of each of the Families below are listed in Appendix II. If your country is a Range State forany of the species in these Families, please enter th e species name in the first column, under the relevantFamily heading. Please indicate (with a ‘X’) whether your country is a Range State or the species isextinct and, where appropriate, please provide published distribution references. (Space is provided forten species in each Family. If additional lines are required, please attach the information as an annex.)
Species Range State Extinct Published distributionreference
Order FALCONIFORMES , Family Cathartidae
RangeState
Extinct
RangeState
Extinct
RangeState
Extinct
RangeState
Extinct
RangeState
Extinct
RangeState
Extinct
RangeState
Extinct
RangeState
Extinct
RangeState
Extinct
RangeState
Extinct
Order FALCONIFORMES , Family Accipitridae
Pernis apivorus RangeState
Extinct ReB, ReM according to TRNKA (1997)
full reference and abbreviations explained in Annex
Milvus migrans RangeState
Extinct ReB, ReM according to TRNKA (1997)
Milvus milvus RangeState
Extinct ReB, ReM, ReW according to TRNKA (1997)
Haliaeetus albicilla RangeState
Extinct ReB, ReM, ReW according to TRNKA (1997)
Gyps fulvus RangeState
Extinct RaV according to TRNKA (1997)
Circaetus gallicus RangeState
Extinct ReB, ReM according to TRNKA (1997)
Circus aeruginosus RangeState
Extinct ReB, ReM, RaW according to TRNKA (1997)
full reference and abbreviations explained in Annex
Circus cyaneus RangeState
Extinct ReM, ReW according to TRNKA (1997)
Circus macrourus RangeState
Extinct RaM according to TRNKA (1997)
Circus pygargus RangeState
Extinct ReB, ReM, [AcW] according to TRNKA (1997)
Order FALCONIFORMES , Family Falconidae
41
Species Range State Extinct Published distributionreference
Falco naumanni RangeState
Extinct [RaB], [RaM] according to TRNKA (1997)
Falco tinnunculus RangeState
Extinct ReB, ReW according to TRNKA (1997)
Falco vespertinus RangeState
Extinct RaB, ReM according to TRNKA (1997)
Falco columbarius RangeState
Extinct ReM, ReW according to TRNKA (1997)
Falco subbuteo RangeState
Extinct ReB, ReM according to TRNKA (1997)
Falco cherrug RangeState
Extinct ReB, ReW according to TRNKA (1997)
Falco peregrinus RangeState
Extinct RaB, ReM, ReW according to TRNKA (1997)
RangeState
Extinct
RangeState
Extinct
RangeState
Extinct
Order PASSERIFORMES, Family Muscicapidae
Erithacus rubecula RangeState
Extinct ReB, ReM, ReW according to TRNKA (1997)
Luscinia luscinia RangeState
Extinct ReB, ReM according to TRNKA (1997)
Luscinia megarhynchos RangeState
Extinct ReB, ReM according to TRNKA (1997)
Luscinia svecica RangeState
Extinct ReB, ReM according to TRNKA (1997)
Phoenicurus ochruros RangeState
Extinct ReB, ReM, ReW according to TRNKA (1997)
Phoenicurus phoenicurus RangeState
Extinct ReB, ReM according to TRNKA (1997)
Saxicola rubetra RangeState
Extinct ReB, ReM according to TRNKA (1997)
Saxicola torquata RangeState
Extinct ReB, ReM, RaW according to TRNKA (1997)
Oenanthe oenanthe RangeState
Extinct ReB, ReM according to TRNKA (1997)
42
Annex:
List of further Appendix II species of the Order Falconiformes, Family Accipitridae and OrderPasseriformes, Family Muscicapidae.
Species Range State Extinct Published distributionreference
Order FALCONIFORMES , Family Accipitridae
Accipiter gentilis RangeState
Extinct ReB, ReW according to TRNKA (1997)
full reference and abbreviations explained below
Accipiter nisus RangeState
Extinct ReB, ReW according to TRNKA (1997)
Buteo buteo RangeState
Extinct ReB, ReW according to TRNKA (1997)
Buteo rufinus RangeState
Extinct RaM, RaW according to TRNKA (1997)
Buteo lagopus RangeState
Extinct ReMf, ReWf according to TRNKA (1997)
Aquila pomarina RangeState
Extinct ReB, ReM according to TRNKA (1997)
Aquila clanga RangeState
Extinct RaM, [AcW] according to TRNKA (1997)
Aquila heliaca RangeState
Extinct ReB, ReM, RaW according to TRNKA (1997)
Aquila chrysaetos RangeState
Extinct ReB, ReW according to TRNKA (1997)
Hieraaetus pennatus RangeState
Extinct RaB, ReM according to TRNKA (1997)
Order PASSERIFORMES, Family Muscicapidae
Monticola saxatilis RangeState
Extinct ReB, ReM according to TRNKA (1997)
Turdus torquatus RangeState
Extinct ReB, ReM, RaW according to TRNKA (1997)
Turdus merula RangeState
Extinct ReB, ReM, ReW according to TRNKA (1997)
Turdus pilaris RangeState
Extinct ReB, ReM, ReW according to TRNKA (1997)
Turdus philomelos RangeState
Extinct ReB, ReM, ReW according to TRNKA (1997)
Turdus iliacus RangeState
Extinct [AcB], ReM, ReW according to TRNKA (1997)
Turdus viscivorus RangeState
Extinct ReB, ReM, ReW according to TRNKA (1997)
Locustella naevia RangeState
Extinct ReB, ReM according to TRNKA (1997)
Locustella fluviatilis RangeState
Extinct ReB, ReM according to TRNKA (1997)
43
Species Range State Extinct Published distributionreference
Locustella luscinioides RangeState
Extinct ReB, ReM according to TRNKA (1997)
full reference and abbreviations explained below
Acrocephalus melanopogon RangeState
Extinct ReB, ReV according to TRNKA (1997)
Acrocephalus paludicola RangeState
Extinct [AcB], RaM according to TRNKA (1997); according toKRIŠTÍN et al. (1998) evaluated as DD
Acrocephalus schoenobaenus RangeState
Extinct ReB, ReM according to TRNKA (1997)
Acrocephalus palustris RangeState
Extinct ReB, ReM according to TRNKA (1997)
Acrocephalus scirpaceus RangeState
Extinct ReB, ReM according to TRNKA (1997)
Acrocephalus arundinaceus RangeState
Extinct ReB, ReM according to TRNKA (1997)
Hippolais icterina RangeState
Extinct ReB, ReM according to TRNKA (1997)
Sylvia nisoria RangeState
Extinct ReB, ReM according to TRNKA (1997)
Sylvia curruca RangeState
Extinct ReB, ReM according to TRNKA (1997)
Sylvia communis RangeState
Extinct ReB, ReM according to TRNKA (1997)
Sylvia borin RangeState
Extinct ReB, ReM according to TRNKA (1997)
Sylvia atricapilla RangeState
Extinct ReB, ReM, RaW according to TRNKA (1997)
Phylloscopus trochiloides RangeState
Extinct AcB, RaM according to TRNKA (1997); according toKRIŠTÍN et al. (1998) evaluated as DD
Phylloscopus sibilatrix RangeState
Extinct ReB, ReM according to TRNKA (1997)
Phylloscopus collybita RangeState
Extinct ReB, ReM, RaW according to TRNKA (1997)
Phylloscopus trochilus RangeState
Extinct ReB, ReM, AcW? according to TRNKA (1997)
Regulus regulus RangeState
Extinct ReB, ReW according to TRNKA (1997)
Regulus ignicapillus RangeState
Extinct ReB, ReM, AcW according to TRNKA (1997)
Muscicapa striata RangeState
Extinct ReB, ReM according to TRNKA (1997)
Ficedula parva RangeState
Extinct ReB, ReM according to TRNKA (1997)
Ficedula albicollis RangeState
Extinct ReB, ReM according to TRNKA (1997)
Ficedula hypoleuca RangeState
Extinct ReB, ReM according to TRNKA (1997)
Panurus biarmicus RangeState
Extinct ReB, ReM, ReW according to TRNKA (1997)
44
45
Further reference and remarks on specific Appendix II fish species
Species Further reference and remarks
ACIPENSERIFORMES
Huso huso last record from the slovak section of the Danube dated in 1925 (KHIN 1957); evaluated as EXaccording to proposal of the Red List of Fish of Slovakia (HENSEL2001); currently being bredonly ex-situ in the Institute of Fishing and Aquaculture located in Častá
Acipenser gueldenstaedtii last records from the Danube originate to 1st half of the 20th century (HOLČÍK, 1989) indicatedin BARUŠet OLIVA (1995); evaluated as EX according to proposal of the Red List of Fish ofSlovakia (HENSEL2001); breeding only ex-situ in the Institute of Fishing and Aquaculturelocated in Častá
Acipenser nudiventris last records from the Danube according to HECKEL et KNER (1858) and HERMAN (1887) inBARUŠet OLIVA (1995); evaluated as EX according to proposal of the Red List of Fish ofSlovakia (HENSEL2001)
Acipenser ruthenus
(Danube population)
according to proposal of the Red List of Fish of Slovakia the species is evaluated as LR:cd(HENSEL2001); only species of the order not being protected in Slovakia; it is being used forcommon fishing, bred also in facilities of Institute of Fishing and Aquaculture inČastá
Acipenser stellatus last catch from the Danube near Komárno (from 1926) indicated by HOLČÍK (1959) in BARUŠ
et OLIVA (1995); evaluated as EX according to proposal of the Red List of Fish of Slovakia(HENSEL2001)
Abbreviations used for the evaluation of occurence character(TRNKA 1997):Re: regular for the period 1990-1997Ra: irregular (rare) for the period 1990-1997Ac: accidental for the period 1800-1997 (up to 10 occurences only)B: breeding birdsM: migrating birdsW: wintering birdsV: visitor[ ]: occurence before 1990 onlyf: fluctuating species
Status according to Red List of Birds of Slovakia(KRIŠTÍN et al. 1998):EX ExtinctCR Critically EndangeredEN EndangeredVU VulnerableLR Lower Risk
cd conservation dependentnt near threatenedlc least concern
DD Data DeficientNE Not Evaluated
46
References:
BARUŠ, V., OLIVA , O. (eds.) 1995. Lampreys(Petromyzontes)and Fish(Osteichtyes)(1).Fauna of the Czech and Slovak Republic. Academia, Prague, Czech Republic. (in Czech)
DANKO, Š. 1974.Nyctalus lasiopterus(Schreber, 1780) in Czechoslovakia. Lynx Vol. 15,Czechoslovakia: 5–8. (in Slovak)
DANKO, Š. 1995. Waterfowl and water-related birds of Senné –Iňačovce (Eastern Slovakia)fishpond area during 1975 – 1994. Tichodroma Vol. 8, Bratislava, Slovakia: 22 – 47. (inSlovak)
DANKO, Š. et al. 1964. BUTEO Vol. 6, Slovakia. (in Slovak)
DANKO, Š., MIHÓK, J. 1989. New data on the occurence of bats in Eastern Slovakia.Proceedings of the East-Slovakian Museum, Natural Sciences Vol. 29, Košice, Slovakia:131–160. (in Slovak)
Group of authors, 2002. Atlas of the Distribution of Birds in Slovakia (in press).
HENSEL, K. 2001. Proposal of Red List of Fish of Slovakia. State Nature Conservancy of theSlovak Republic, Banská Bystrica, Slovakia. Msc. (in Slovak)
HORÁČEK, I., HANÁK, V. 1989. Distributional status ofMyotis dasycneme.In: HANÁK, V.,HORÁČEK, I., GAISLER, J. (eds.). European Bat Research 1987, Charles Univ. Press, Prague,Czech Republic: 565–590.
HORÁČEK, I., HANÁK, V., ZIMA , J., ČERVENÝ, J. 1995. Towards the bat fauna of Slovakia I. -Summer discoveries 1979-1992. Bats 1: 39–54. (in Czech)
HUDEC K., et al. 1983. Fauna of the Czech and Slovak Socialistic Republic. Birds 3/II.Academia, Prague, Czechoslovak Socialistic Republic. (in Czech)
HUDEC, K. et al. 1994. Fauna of the Czech Republic and the Slovak Republic. Birds 1.Academia, Prague, Czech Republic. (in Czech)
HUDEC, K., ČERNÝ, W. et al. 1977. Fauna of the Czech and Slovak Socialistic Republic. Birds2. Academia, Prague, Czechoslovak Socialistic Republic. (in Czech)
KALIVODOVÁ , E., DAROLOVÁ, A. 1998. Birds of Slovak Section of the Danube and Žitnýostrov. Edition Biosphere, Serie of scientific literature Vol. A1, Bratislava, Slovakia. (inSlovak)
KRIŠTÍN, A., DANKO, Š., DAROLOVÁ, A., KOCIAN, Ľ., KROPIL, R., MURIN, B., STOLLMANN ,A., URBAN, P. 1998. Red List and Ecosozological Status of Birds (Aves) of Slovakia.Ochrana prírody 16. Slovak Environmental Agency – Centre of Nature and LandscapeProtection Banská Bystrica, Slovakia: 219-232. (in Slovak)
MATIS, Š., DANKO, Š., PJENČÁK, P., UHRIN, M., FULÍN, M. 2000. New data on the occurenceof Pond bat (Myotis dasycneme) in Slovakia, Vespertilio 4, Bat Protection Group Slovakiaand Czech Bat Conservation Trust, Revúca and Prague: 127–134. (in Slovak with Englishsummary)
TRNKA, A. 1997. Current List of Birds of Slovakia. Trnava University for Slovak RaritiesCommittee, Trnava, Slovakia.
TRNKA, A., 1997. Ornithocenoses ofthe Pusté Úľany fish ponds – proposed protected site.Nature Conservation Vol 15, Slovak Environmental Agency, Centre of Nature and LandscapeProtection Banská Bystrica, Slovakia: 175 – 182. (in Slovak)
TRNKA, R., TRNKA , A., BOHUŠ, M. 1998. Occurence, abundance, monitoring andconservation of the White-tailed Eagle (Haliaeetus albicilla) in Slovakia in1996-1997. NatureConservation Vol.16, Banská Bystrica, Slovakia: 177-191. (in Slovak)
UHRIN, M., DANKO, Š., OBUCH, J. 1995. Distribution of bats in Slovakia, part II, In: URBAN,P. (ed.): Research and Conservation of mammals in Slovakia 2, Slovak Environment AgencyBanská Bystrica, Slovakia: 71–85. (in Slovak)
47
UHRIN, M., DANKO, Š., OBUCH, J., HORÁČEK, I., PAČENOVSKÝ, S., PJENČÁK, P., FULÍN, M.1996. Distributional patterns of bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) in Slovakia. Part 1, Horshoebats (Rhinolophidae). Acta Soc. Zool. Bohem. 60, Prague, Czech Republic: 247-279.
UHRIN, M., LEHOTSKÁ, B., BENDA, P., LEHOTSKÝ, R., MATIS, Š. 1997. Distribution of bats inSlovakia, Part 3,Miniopterus schreibersi.Vespertilio 2: 113–130. (in Slovak)