Top Banner
Slides to accompany Weathington, Cunningham & Pittenger (2010), Chapter 3: The Foundations of Research 1
36

Slides to accompany Weathington, Cunningham & Pittenger (2010), Chapter 3: The Foundations of Research 1.

Jan 02, 2016

Download

Documents

Avis Lewis
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Slides to accompany Weathington, Cunningham & Pittenger (2010), Chapter 3: The Foundations of Research 1.

Slides to accompany Weathington, Cunningham & Pittenger (2010),

Chapter 3: The Foundations of Research

1

Page 2: Slides to accompany Weathington, Cunningham & Pittenger (2010), Chapter 3: The Foundations of Research 1.

Objectives

• Hypotheses and research

• Utility of hypotheses

• Types of hypotheses

• Measurement

• Reliability of measurement

• Validity of measurement

• Populations and samples2

Page 3: Slides to accompany Weathington, Cunningham & Pittenger (2010), Chapter 3: The Foundations of Research 1.

What is the difference between a theory and a hypothesis?

3

Page 4: Slides to accompany Weathington, Cunningham & Pittenger (2010), Chapter 3: The Foundations of Research 1.

Hypotheses

• Are informed, specific predictions about how multiple variables will be related

• Based on theory or previous research

• Guide the progress of science

– What data to collect

– What research methods to use

– How to analyze the data4

Page 5: Slides to accompany Weathington, Cunningham & Pittenger (2010), Chapter 3: The Foundations of Research 1.

A theory is…

• A broad set of general statements and/or claims that helps us to explain and predict events

• Not the same thing as a hypothesis

• May develop from a series of studies that test hypotheses

5

Page 6: Slides to accompany Weathington, Cunningham & Pittenger (2010), Chapter 3: The Foundations of Research 1.

Role of Theory, Hypothesis, Research

THEORY

RESEARCH

HYPOTHESIS

PREVIOUS RESEARCH

Support or refute theory

Basis of additional research

6

Page 7: Slides to accompany Weathington, Cunningham & Pittenger (2010), Chapter 3: The Foundations of Research 1.

Confirmatory Research

• When goal is to support or confirm the validity of an existing theory

• Hypotheses are used in these types of studies

– Helps to protect against the Idols of the Theatre

7

Page 8: Slides to accompany Weathington, Cunningham & Pittenger (2010), Chapter 3: The Foundations of Research 1.

Exploratory Research

• Focus is on examining an interesting phenomenon

• Prior theory is not required

• Caution against Idols of the Cave

– Systemmatic observation can and should still be used

8

Page 9: Slides to accompany Weathington, Cunningham & Pittenger (2010), Chapter 3: The Foundations of Research 1.

Utility of Hypotheses

• Guide to specific variables

– Dependent (DV) vs. independent (IV)

– Subject

– Control

• Describe the variables’ relationship(s)

– Causal or correlational?

• Link research to population

9

Page 10: Slides to accompany Weathington, Cunningham & Pittenger (2010), Chapter 3: The Foundations of Research 1.

Types of Hypotheses - #1

Estimating population characteristics

• Inferring population details from sample

1. Data collected from sample

2. Descriptive statistics calculated

3. Infer to the population level

• If sample is truly representative

• Statistics are always estimates of parameters

10

Page 11: Slides to accompany Weathington, Cunningham & Pittenger (2010), Chapter 3: The Foundations of Research 1.

Types of Hypotheses - #2

Correlational

• X and Y are related

• Positive vs. negative relationship

• Strength of the relationship

11

Page 12: Slides to accompany Weathington, Cunningham & Pittenger (2010), Chapter 3: The Foundations of Research 1.

12

Page 13: Slides to accompany Weathington, Cunningham & Pittenger (2010), Chapter 3: The Foundations of Research 1.

Types of Hypotheses - #3

Difference among Populations

• Testing for differences between average members of separate populations

• 1 variable classifies members of groups, another variable is the DV of interest

• Sample statistics to make inferences about population-level differences

13

Page 14: Slides to accompany Weathington, Cunningham & Pittenger (2010), Chapter 3: The Foundations of Research 1.

Types of Hypotheses - #4

Cause and effect

• X Y

• Causal relationship supported if:

1. X before Y in time

2. X, Y are correlated

3. No other variables explain X Y

14

Page 15: Slides to accompany Weathington, Cunningham & Pittenger (2010), Chapter 3: The Foundations of Research 1.

Measurement is...

• a way of quantifying our observations

• objective

• replicable

15

Page 16: Slides to accompany Weathington, Cunningham & Pittenger (2010), Chapter 3: The Foundations of Research 1.

Operational Definitions

• Formula for a construct that other scientists can use to duplicate it in future studies

– Focus on observable signs of constructs

– Not simple description

1. From hypothesis, identify the constructs

2. Choose a form(s) of measurement that allows us to address each construct best

16

Page 17: Slides to accompany Weathington, Cunningham & Pittenger (2010), Chapter 3: The Foundations of Research 1.

Anxiety

OBSERVABLE EVENTS

HYPOTHESIZED CONSTRUCT

No opportunity for escape

Unfamiliar situation/change

Threat of aversive eventPhysiological measures:•Sweating•Increased heart rate•Increased blood pressure•Rapid, shallow breathing

Behavioral measures:•Inhibited behavior (unable to perform simple tasks)•Pacing, rapid eye movements, startle-reflex•Stammering, other speech problems

Other indicators:•Responses to “anxiety assessment”•Expressed need to be with others

17

Page 18: Slides to accompany Weathington, Cunningham & Pittenger (2010), Chapter 3: The Foundations of Research 1.

Measurement Scales

• Nominal = qualitative, categories

– Measures the property of difference

– Sorts objects/attributes into categories

– Please indicate your sex: M F

• Ordinal = quantitative, ranks

– Measure differences in magnitude

– Grade scale A > B > C, but how much?

18

Page 19: Slides to accompany Weathington, Cunningham & Pittenger (2010), Chapter 3: The Foundations of Research 1.

Measurement Scales

• Interval, quantitative

– Different, magnitude, and equal interval

– Can add and subtract

– Personality test

• Ratio, quantitative

– Diff., magnit., equal ints., true 0

– Time on task19

Page 20: Slides to accompany Weathington, Cunningham & Pittenger (2010), Chapter 3: The Foundations of Research 1.

Reliability of Measurement

• Maximum consistency is the goal

• Challenges:

– Measurement error - random

– Bias error – consistent/constant

Score = True score +/- Measurement error

• Table 3.520

Page 21: Slides to accompany Weathington, Cunningham & Pittenger (2010), Chapter 3: The Foundations of Research 1.

Validity of Measurement• How accurate is the measurement?

– “Trueness” of the interpretations researchers make from the test scores

• Judgment call based on data

– Face validity = authenticity?

– Content validity = true behavior sampling?

– Predictive/concurrent validity = X, Y relationship as expected?

– Construct validity = accurate construct measurement?

21

Page 22: Slides to accompany Weathington, Cunningham & Pittenger (2010), Chapter 3: The Foundations of Research 1.

Unreliable and Invalid

22

Page 23: Slides to accompany Weathington, Cunningham & Pittenger (2010), Chapter 3: The Foundations of Research 1.

Reliable, but Invalid

Measure can be reliable, but still be invalid

23

Page 24: Slides to accompany Weathington, Cunningham & Pittenger (2010), Chapter 3: The Foundations of Research 1.

Reliable and Valid

Measure must be reliable to be valid

24

Page 25: Slides to accompany Weathington, Cunningham & Pittenger (2010), Chapter 3: The Foundations of Research 1.

Relating Samples to Populations• Samples = smaller set of the larger

population of interest

– Representative vs. convenience

•Size and matching characteristics

– Manageability

•Resources and costs

25

Page 26: Slides to accompany Weathington, Cunningham & Pittenger (2010), Chapter 3: The Foundations of Research 1.

Population SampleSampling frame

26

Page 27: Slides to accompany Weathington, Cunningham & Pittenger (2010), Chapter 3: The Foundations of Research 1.

Random Sampling

• Best way to generate a representative subset of a population

• Simple random sampling = Each member with an equal probability of being sampled

27

Page 28: Slides to accompany Weathington, Cunningham & Pittenger (2010), Chapter 3: The Foundations of Research 1.

Random Sampling

• Essential when:

1. Goal is to estimate pop. characteristics

2. Trying to develop a test or intervention for a larger population

28

Page 29: Slides to accompany Weathington, Cunningham & Pittenger (2010), Chapter 3: The Foundations of Research 1.

Random Sampling

• Not essential when we are interested in basic relationships among variables

• BUT,

– Risky generalization

– Requires multiple replications

29

Page 30: Slides to accompany Weathington, Cunningham & Pittenger (2010), Chapter 3: The Foundations of Research 1.

Random Sampling from Population

POPULATION

SAMPLE

INFERENCE

30

Page 31: Slides to accompany Weathington, Cunningham & Pittenger (2010), Chapter 3: The Foundations of Research 1.

Random Assignment

• Not same as random sampling

• Assignment = actual placement in experimental groups

• Minimizes confounds and maximizes transfer of results to pop.

– Good for internal and external validity

31

Page 32: Slides to accompany Weathington, Cunningham & Pittenger (2010), Chapter 3: The Foundations of Research 1.

No Confounding Variables

SAMPLE

Control Group

Experimental Group

Differences are due to manipulation, not an extraneous variable

because mood is randomly determined.

32

Page 33: Slides to accompany Weathington, Cunningham & Pittenger (2010), Chapter 3: The Foundations of Research 1.

Confounding Variables

SAMPLE

Control Group

Experimental Group

Unclear if differences are due to manipulation or confounding variable

(mood)33

Page 34: Slides to accompany Weathington, Cunningham & Pittenger (2010), Chapter 3: The Foundations of Research 1.

Random Assignment

SAMPLEControl Group

Experimental Group

Now you can test these two groups for differences with less

concern for confounds 34

Page 35: Slides to accompany Weathington, Cunningham & Pittenger (2010), Chapter 3: The Foundations of Research 1.

Questions so far this chapter?

What about so far in this course?

35

Page 36: Slides to accompany Weathington, Cunningham & Pittenger (2010), Chapter 3: The Foundations of Research 1.

What is Next?

• **instructor to provide details

36