M. Woods, SLAC SLD SLD Compton Polarimeter Compton Polarimeter (also Compton polarimetry at NLC, DIS-Parity) SLD Compton Polarimeter at SLC Compton Polarimetry at NLC Compton Polarimeter for DIS-Parity LOI JLAB Polarimetry Workshop June 9-10, 2003 Mike Woods, SLAC
37
Embed
SLD Compton Polarimeter-no atomic or nuclear physics corrections (ex. Levchuk effect in Moller polarimetry)-reference for O(α3) corrections: M. Swartz, Phys.Rev.D58:014010,1998 Electron
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
M. Woods, SLAC
SLDSLD Compton PolarimeterCompton Polarimeter(also Compton polarimetry at NLC, DIS-Parity)
SLD Compton Polar imeter at SLC
Compton Polar imetry at NLC
Compton Polar imeter for DIS-Par ity LOI
JLAB Polar imetry Workshop June 9-10, 2003Mike Woods, SLAC
M. Woods, SLACM. Woods, SLAC
SLDSLD Experiment at the SLAC Linear ColliderExperiment at the SLAC Linear Collider
M. Woods, SLAC
Simple Cuts to select hadronic Z events• Energy imbalance < 0.6
• >22 GeV energy in calorimeter
• 3 or more charged tracks
LReRL
RLm A|P|
NN
NNA =
+−=
AALR LR Measurement at Measurement at SLDSLD
Simple Counting Exper iment• can use all final states (no particle ID)• no kinematic reconstruction• no need to distinguish fermion from
anti-fermion• no final state interaction effects
M. Woods, SLAC
1.6%
0.64%
0.07%
0.15%
0.39%
0.50%
1997-8
0.63%0.75%1.7%3.6%Total Systematic
3.7%2.8%4.3%44%Statistics
0.16%0.17%1.1%-Chromatic Effects
0.05%0.06%0.1%2.4%Bkg., detector ,…
0.37%0.33%--Energy Scale
0.50%0.64%1.3%2.7%Polar imetry
19961994-519931992
SLDSLD AALRLR result and result and SystematicsSystematics
00027.023097.0sin
00216.015138.02
0
±=
±=eff
W
LRA
θ
ALR Statistics and Systematic Errors
M. Woods, SLAC
Experimental Constraints on the Higgs MassExperimental Constraints on the Higgs Mass
Established measurements of the Z boson mass at LEP and the top quark mass at the Tevatron allow predictions of the Higgs mass from precise measurements of the weak mixing angle, the W mass and the Z width. The yellow region is excluded by direct searches at LEP.
M. Woods, SLAC
Focusing and Steering Lens
Compton Polarimeter Compton Polarimeter
M. Woods, SLAC
M. Woods, SLAC
Features of Features of SLDSLD Compton polarimeterCompton polarimeter
Physics is well understood QED; radiativecorrections <0.1%- no atomic or nuclear physics corrections (ex. Levchuk effect
in Moller polarimetry)- reference for O(α3) corrections: M. Swartz, Phys.Rev.D58:014010,1998
Electron beam backgrounds measured with laser off pulses
Polar imetry data taken parasitic to physics data (electron detector only)
Scatter ing rate is high; ~1% polarization determination in a few minutes
Laser helicity selected with a pseudo-random sequence
Laser polar ization determined to 0.1%
Beam-beam depolar ization effects can be measured by compar ing measurements with and without collisions
M. Woods, SLAC
Electron Cherenkov Detector (CKV)Electron Cherenkov Detector (CKV)
8mm Pb radiator
EGS4 simulation for shower from 1 electron
EGS-generated response function for CKV-7, with (solid line) and without (dashed line) 8mmlead pre-radiator.
Gas is propane at 1atm; 11 MeV threshold
M. Woods, SLAC
Raw Data from CKV DetectorRaw Data from CKV Detector(during e- - only running)
PGC (polarimeter gamma counter): - threshold gas (14 MeV; 1 atm ethylene) Cherenkov counter - insertable lead pre-radiator; 1 PMT
QFC (quartz fiber calorimeter): - quartz fibers with tungsten radiators; 0.2 MeV threshold(34 longitudinal sections, each 1 radiation length)
- 24 PMTs (10X, 10Y, SUMX, SUMY, 2 Bkgd)
24 PMTsPMT
InsertablePb pre-radiators
M. Woods, SLAC
QFC Data and QFC Data and SystematicsSystematics
Measurement, MC<0.1%Optical cross talk
0.6%Total
In situ study0.1%Laser pickup
In situ study0.1%Electronics cross-talk
LED study, beam test0.5%Electronics linear ity
MC, in situ study<0.1%Re-scattered electrons
MC simulation<0.1%Angular acceptance, beam size
Beam test, MC 0.1%Detector mis-alignment
Beam test, MC0.3%Detector non-uniformity
Beam test, MC0.2%Energy Response
MethodErrorSystematic
D. Onoprienko, SLD-Note-267, 1999 and Ph.D. thesis, SLAC-Report-556, 2000.
M. Woods, SLAC
PGC Data and PGC Data and SystematicsSystematics
PGC analysis described in R. Frey, SLD-Note-266, 1999,and IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 45, 670, 1998.
T-4100.5” Pb
T-4101.0” Pb
T-4101.5” Pb
SLC data with e- only, 1” Pb
0.6%Total
In situ study0.1%Laser pickup
In situ study0.3%Detector effects (uniformity, geometry,
linear ity)
Beam test, MC0.5%Energy Response
MethodErrorSystematic
No e-
e-, no laser
Jz = 1/2
Jz = 3/2
M. Woods, SLAC
Analyzing Power Systematic ErrorAnalyzing Power Systematic Error
Estimate CKV7 systematic error in analyzing power at 0.3% from table scan data that determines location of Compton edge and accuracy of modeling detector response function
Results from cross-check Polar imeters
0.4% systematic er ror
Residual of CKV7 polarization to results from PGC and QFC was ∆P/P=(0.30±0.39)%.
Polarization Summary for all SLD RunsPolarization Summary for all SLD Runs
Ph. D. Students: R. Elia, SLAC-Report-429, 1994; R. King, SLAC-Report-452, 1994;A. Lath, SLAC-Report-454, 1994; T. Junk, SLAC-Report-476, 1995; E. Torrence, SLAC-Report-509, 1997; J. Fernandez, SLAC-Report-519, 1999;P. Reinertsen, SLAC-Report-537, 1998; D. Onoprienko, SLAC-Report-556, 2000.
M. Woods, SLAC
The “ 17Hz Problem” in the 1994 runThe “ 17Hz Problem” in the 1994 run
Reflection from inverter (added due to BPM miswiring in downtime) causes every 7th pulse to be off-energy
Observe i) phasing of off-energy pulse wrt laser pulse shifts every 40sii) large scatter in electron polarization measurements
Implemented tr igger ing of laser on 6th machine pulse rather than the 7th machine pulse every ~10 seconds, to ensure beam backgrounds for laser off pulses identical to beam backgrounds for laser on pulses.
M. Woods, SLAC
Arc Spin RotationArc Spin RotationSpin precession in the SLC arc is nearly resonant with vertical betatron oscillation
1. Vertical betatron oscillation in a quadrupole string
2. Vertical betatron oscillation with horizontal dipoles added
• 20 combined function magnets• Spin precession of 10850
• Betatron phase advance of 10800
SLC arc consists of 23 achromats• Launch into arc with electron spin ver tical• Two or thogonal ‘spin bumps’ allow arbitrary control• Optimize spin bumps to minimize total precession in
the arcs reducing polar ization dependence on energy
ξξξξdiv====(-0.24 ± 0.08)% correction for 1997/98 run
3. Depolarization due to beamstrahlung spin flip- expect effect to be <0.1%- effect measured to be <0.001 by comparing polarization measurements with and
without positrons presentξξξξdiv====(0.0 ± 0.1)%
( )ξ+=− 1Comptone
wtlume PP
- determine n(E) from automated wire scans (every 4 hours) at point of high dispersion;P(E) by varying beam energy (optimize spin bumps to minimize)L(E) from optics models and measured dependence of Z production on
beam energyξξξξdiv====(+0.12 ± 0.08)% for 1997/98 Run
M. Woods, SLAC
0.25%0.50%TOTAL
0.05%0.2%Electronic Noise
0.1%0.2%Linear ity
0.2%0.4%Analyzing Power
0.1%0.1%Laser Polar ization
NLC Goal
δδδδP/P
SLD
δδδδP/P
Uncer tainty
Goals for Compton PolarimetryGoals for Compton Polarimetry SystematicsSystematicsat NLCat NLC
Improve linear ity by: - higher resolution adcs (16-bit rather than 11-bit)- blue diode laser calibration and bias system - compare laser jitter, toroid jitter with detector jitter- use of Compton laser power scans
Improve analyzing power by: - more segmentation of channels near Compton edge in CKV detector- careful design and simulation of spectrometer and detector
(original design goal for SLD was 1%)- detailed systematics data taking- cross-checks (if possible): Compton gamma detectors,
W-pair asymmetries, polarized Moller asymmetriesElectronic Noise includes crosstalk and laser pickup: reduce by careful setup and accurate measurements
M. Woods, SLAC
Polarimetry Options at a future LCPolarimetry Options at a future LC
Mott Polarimeter at Source for commissioning
Compton Polarimeterbefore IPafter IP+ after energy collimation for fixed target
Blondel scheme if both beams polarized
W-pair asymmetry- with only electrons polarized- better with both beams polarized
M. Woods, SLAC
Improved Weak Mixing angle determination at Improved Weak Mixing angle determination at GigaGiga--ZZvia Avia ALRLR measurementmeasurement
(positrons unpolarized)
M. Woods, SLAC
Polarimetry using WPolarimetry using W--pair asymmetriespair asymmetries
Can we use asymmetry in forward W pairs as a polar imeter?
Yes, if can achieve backgrounds below 1%.(This level of backgrounds is achieved for LEP200 W massmeasurements, if require one W to decay to ee or µµ.)If positron beam is also polarized, can use Blondel-type scheme to
fit for beam polarizations as well as physics asymmetry andeliminate sensitivity to backgrounds
• advantage wrt Compton polarimetry is that anydepolarization in beam-beam interaction is properlyaccounted for (need to be above W-pair threshold though)
• disadvantage wrt Compton polarimetry is Compton canachieve 1% accuracy in a few minutes
e-
e+
W-
W+
ν
M. Woods, SLAC
Blondel Blondel scheme with electron and positron beams scheme with electron and positron beams both polarizedboth polarized
%50%,90 == +− PP
%25.0%,25.0 == +
+
−
−
P
P
P
P δδ%55.96
1=
++= +−
+−
PP
PPPeff
%10.0=eff
eff
P
PδLReff
RLLR
RLLR APNN
NN =+−
Can also use ‘Blondel scheme’ to determine beam polar izations directly:
LRLLRLRR
LLRLRR
LRRRRLLL
RRRLLL
APNNNN
NNNN
APNNNN
NNNN
LR
LR
LR
LR
+
−
=+++−−+
=+++−−+
- using Blondel technique, just need Compton polarimeters for measuring polarization differences between L,R states;and only need to spend approx. 10% of running time in NRR, NLL states
- this technique directly measures lum-wted polarizations (any depolarizationeffect properly taken into account)
M. Woods, SLAC
Extraction Line Design at NLCExtraction Line Design at NLC
Location for Compton IP (also for wire scanner to measurebeam energy distribution)- secondary focus with 20mm dispersion
Detailed design for polarimeter in progress
M. Woods, SLAC
Compton Kinematics and Cross SectionsCompton Kinematics and Cross Sectionsat NLC/TESLAat NLC/TESLA
-can have a large separation between the kinematic endpoint energythe beam energy
- large Compton asymmetry at high energy
(500 GeV electrons, 1.165 eV photons)
Spectrum of Compton-scattered electrons
M. Woods, SLAC
Total
Depolarization Effects at NLCDepolarization Effects at NLC(see SLAC PUB 8716, K. Thompson Jan. 2001)
Lum-wted depolarization is approx.25% of average depolarization
Depolarization can be large for beam particles thatlose significant energy to beamstrahlung
Depolarization can be large for large vertical offset(may have large effect for first bunches in
including the best measurement of the weak mixing angle and best indirect search limits for the SM Higgs boson
Polar imetry at a future LC• requires 0.25% precision or better• currently designing Compton polarimeter to achieve this• better precision is possible if positrons also polarized• physics asymmetry with forward W-pair events is promising
Polar imetry for SLAC DIS-Par ity LOI• 0.6% statistical error on physics asymmetry requires
0.3% precision for polarimetry• use SLD’s Compton polarimeter with some upgrades• can be a testbed for demonstrating precision required for LC