Top Banner
Slavery and National Politics Issues and Consequences, 1844- 1861
15

Slavery and National Politics Issues and Consequences, 1844-1861.

Dec 21, 2015

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Slavery and National Politics Issues and Consequences, 1844-1861.

Slavery and National Politics

Issues and Consequences, 1844-1861

Page 2: Slavery and National Politics Issues and Consequences, 1844-1861.

Slavery In The Territories

• Big issue—delayed Tx. Annexation—but trumped by “Manifest Destiny” in 1840s.

• “Logic” of 2d Party System kept this issue at bay, but Mexican War reopened the issue.

• View of Mexican War

• Wilmot Proviso

• Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo

Page 3: Slavery and National Politics Issues and Consequences, 1844-1861.

Slave or Free, Who Decides

• Wilmot Proviso

• Common Property Argument—J. C. Calhoun

• Extension of Mo. Comp. Line—Polk

• Popular Sovereignty—Lewis Cass

• Supreme Court decides—John Clayton

Page 4: Slavery and National Politics Issues and Consequences, 1844-1861.

Wilmot, Calhoun, Polk,Cass, Clayton

Page 5: Slavery and National Politics Issues and Consequences, 1844-1861.

1848 Election

• Slavery intrudes: Barnburners and Hunkers among NY. Democrats; Conscience and Cotton Whigs in Mass; Freesoilers emerge out of Dems., Whigs, and Liberty Party, Yancey bolts from Dem. Convention.

• Van Buren and Liberty party took enough votes to cost the Democrats the electoral vote in New York and the Whigs the electoral vote in Ohio.

• Zachary Taylor Won.

Page 6: Slavery and National Politics Issues and Consequences, 1844-1861.
Page 7: Slavery and National Politics Issues and Consequences, 1844-1861.

Taylor, Cass, Van Buren, Yancey

Page 8: Slavery and National Politics Issues and Consequences, 1844-1861.

Toward an Armistice

• Slavery in the west; slavery in D. C. More sectional voting patterns.

• Territorial Governments have to be organized; Gold Rush allows Ca. to petition for statehood—issue can’t be avoided.

• Henry S. Foote (Ms.) pulled revolver on Thomas Hart Benton (Mo) on 4/17/50

• Open talk of secession/Nashville Convention planned.

Page 9: Slavery and National Politics Issues and Consequences, 1844-1861.

Henry S. Foote (1804-1880); Thomas Hart Benton (1782-1858)

Page 10: Slavery and National Politics Issues and Consequences, 1844-1861.

Last Hurrah for “Harry of the West”

Omnibus Proposal, Jan. 29. 1850• Ca. admitted as Free State• New Mex. Territory organized with no restriction on

slavery• “Little” Texas• U. S. assumes Tx’s. natl. debt.• No slavery in D. C.• Slave trade in D. C.• Congressional self-denying ordinance in interstate slave

trade• Stronger Fugitive slave law

Page 11: Slavery and National Politics Issues and Consequences, 1844-1861.

“Big Texas”

Page 12: Slavery and National Politics Issues and Consequences, 1844-1861.

Speechifying and Dying

• Calhoun’s Address, March 4, 1850

• Webster’s “7th of March” Address

• Seward’s “Higher Law” Address, March 11, 1850

• Calhound died March 31, 1850

• Bill fashioned out of Omnibus by Committee of 13 died on July 31, 1850.

• Zachary Taylor died July 9, 1850

Page 13: Slavery and National Politics Issues and Consequences, 1844-1861.

Valedictory of “The Great Triumvirate”

Page 14: Slavery and National Politics Issues and Consequences, 1844-1861.

Seward, Whittier, and Millard (not Mallard) Fillmore

Page 15: Slavery and National Politics Issues and Consequences, 1844-1861.

A “Compromise” or an “Armistice”

• Fillmore support’s Douglas’ crafting of 5 separate bills with specific voting majorities “engineered” to insure passage.

• Surprising results: California was a free state with pro-Southern senators; Utah got a slave code but had only 20 slaves in 1860; Fugitive Slave Act exacerbated northern opinion against the “slave power.”

• Nashville Convention fizzled and “fire eater” southerners don’t prevail at the polls in state level elections.