-
Skyline College Annual Program Plan Page 12 of 13 January
2013
SKYLINE COLLEGE INSTRUCTIONAL AND STUDENT SERVICES
ANNUAL PROGRAM/UNIT PLANNING DOCUMENT
INTRODUCTION
The Skyline College faculty, staff and administration support
the evaluation of programs and services through the Annual Program
planning process as the College continually strives to demonstrate
and improve institutional effectiveness and student outcomes. The
Skyline College Community embraces the concept that only through
authentic, deep and on-going evaluation and assessment can
institutions improve their programs and services to meet the
evolving needs of students. Annual Program Planning and
Comprehensive Program Review are intended to provide every program
and service area with the opportunity to review and assess itself
in relation to its mission, its goals and objectives, and its
relationship to the mission of the College and the District, as
well as fulfillment of needs presented by students and the local
community. The Skyline College Annual Program Plan is an integral
piece of the planning and budget processes. The Skyline College
model is an integrated one, used by instructional programs and
student services. The integrated model is one that allows each
Program and Service Area to maintain its identity and uniqueness,
while creating a standardized approach to annual planning. The
purpose of the Annual Program Plan is to collect information to be
used by the college planning bodies IPC (Institutional Planning
Committee), ILT (Instructional Leadership Team), SSLT (Student
Services Leadership Team), CBC (College Budget Committee),
Full-Time Faculty Allocation Committee (FTEFAC) and may be used for
Program Improvement and Viability (PIV). Through this process,
faculty/staff have the opportunity to review the mission and vision
of their department/program. Then, using multiple measures and
inquiry, faculty will reflect on and evaluate their work for the
purposes of improving student learning and program effectiveness.
This reflection will identify steps and resources necessary to work
towards the program vision including personnel, professional
development, facilities, and equipment. Annual program plans are
completed by each program/department/unit yearly. The Annual
Program Planning document can serve as the basis for completing the
six-year Comprehensive Program Review.
PURPOSES To develop, maintain, improve and promote quality
instruction and support services in order to
optimize student learning outcomes and access To promote
dialogue and collaboration among faculty, administrative and
classified staff, and
students To enhance interaction among programs, instruction, and
student support services To ensure the effective and efficient
utilization of the College's human, financial physical, and
technology resources To ensure a process in accordance with
Accreditation Standards consistent with the District and
College vision, mission and goals
-
Skyline College Annual Program Planning Page 2 of 13 January
2013
SUGGESTED TIMELINES FOR ANNUAL PROGRAM PLANNING
PLANNING AND REVIEW OF DATA NEEDS: NOVEMBER DEPARTMENT OR
DIVISION MEETING Program/Unit teams are identified and organized.
Departments or programs are urged to include
part-time faculty and appropriate classified staff in the review
process.
Planning team reviews the instrument.
Basic enrollment, retention data, and other pertinent data will
be provided by the Office of Planning, Research and Institutional
Effectiveness (PRIE). (Change to the active tense to stay
consistent with the other statements) The Office of Planning,
Research and Institutional Effectiveness (PRIE) provides basic
enrollment, retention data, and other pertinent data.
Planning team collects data including course and program student
learning outcomes from Tracdat.
Initial findings are discussed with the entire department and
Division Dean/Administrator. The entire department and Division
Dean/Administrator discuss initial findings.
Additional data requested from PRIE as needed. Teams request
additional data as needed from PRIE.
PROGRAM/UNIT ANALYSIS DATA: JANUARY/FEBRUARY DEPARTMENT OR
DIVISION MEETINGS Planning team analyzes data, including course and
program student learning outcomes, student
success and retention data, and other data as needed.
Planning team reviews all courses for currency and assures
course outlines are correctly formatted to the most current course
outline of record template, and ensures they are accurately input
into CurricUNET.
Planning team completes program/unit data analysis/assessment
and summarizes findings. Programs/units start to update annual
planning report. PROGRAM/UNIT DEVELOPMENT OF ACTION PLAN AND
RESOURCE NEEDS: MARCH DEPARTMENT OR DIVISION MEETING Program/unit
faculty/staff develop action plan and resource needs in response to
assessment of
program data.
Program/unit faculty/staff finalize the Annual Program Planning
self-study and in the first week of April submit one electronic and
one paper copy of the planning self-study to the Office of
Planning, Research and Institutional Effectiveness for distribution
to the Institutional Planning Committee (IPC).
The Institutional Planning Committee reviews all submitted
annual program plans and distributes requests for allocations
through the approved college processes.
Program/Unit planning resource recommendations are placed into
existing college resource recommendations for the subsequent
academic year. (This sentence also is written in the passive, but I
wasnt clear on who places these recommendations.)
-
Skyline College Annual Program Planning Page 3 of 13 January
2013
SKYLINE COLLEGE ANNUAL PROGRAM PLANNING
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETION OF SELF STUDY
The forms to complete the self-study can be obtained on the
Program Review website at
http://www.skylinecollege.edu/programreview/directionsandforms.php.
The site provides links to the Annual Program/Unit Planning
document. You can complete the self-study form on your computer.
You will need Adobe Acrobat Professional or the newest version of
Reader in order to complete your form. Computers configured since
2011 should have Adobe Pro for those with an older version of Adobe
Acrobat Reader, please submit a work request with IT to be upgraded
to Pro or the newest version of Reader. This upgrade can only be
placed on SMCCCD issued computers. Save your form as a PDF format.
Save and name your file as Program Name_AP_Year (e.g.,
Mathematics_AP_2013). Self-Study Submit the report including both
questions and responses. Tracdat reports Attach your summary of
assessment, analysis and action plans for the courses and/or
program completed during this academic year. Tool:
https://sanmateo.tracdat.com/tracdat/ Needs Summary Form Briefly
list your resource needs in the space provided and submit as part
of your completed annual planning document.
-
Skyline College Annual Program Planning Page 4 of 13 January
2013
SKYLINE COLLEGE ANNUAL PROGRAM PLANNING SELF-STUDY
Note: To complete this form, SAVE it on your computer, then send
to your Division Dean/VPI as an
ATTACHMENT on an e-mail message.
Program Title: Date Submitted: Key Findings: 1. Planning Group
Participants (include PT& FT faculty, staff, students,
stakeholders)
List of names and positions: 2. Contact Person (include e-mail
and telephone): 3. Program Information A. Program Personnel
Identify the number of personnel (administrators, faculty,
classified, volunteers, and student workers) in the program:
FT Faculty: PT/OL Faculty (FTE): FT Classified: PT Classified
(FTE): Volunteers: Student Workers:
-
Skyline College Annual Program Planning Page 5 of 13 January
2013
B. Program Mission and Goals State the goals/focus of the
program and how the program contributes to the mission and
priorities of the College and District. Address how the program
meets the current years strategic priorities. (200 word limit)
4. Program/Service Area: Student Learning Outcomes and Program
Data A. Summarize recent course and/or program SLO assessment,
identify trends and discuss areas in need of improvement. Please
attach summary Tracdat reports with assessment and analysis for
SLOs evaluated during the year (prior to submission deadline of
April 1st)
Tool: https://sanmateo.tracdat.com/tracdat/
-
Skyline College Annual Program Planning Page 6 of 13 January
2013
B. Analyze evidence of Program performance. Review and analyze
productivity, student characteristics and outcomes. Tool:
http://www.skylinecollege.edu/prie/programdata.php C. Explain how
other information may impact the Program (examples are business and
employment needs, new technology, new transfer requirements
etc.)
-
Skyline College Annual Program Planning Page 7 of 13 January
2013
5. Curricular Offerings
Tools: CurricUNET http://www.curricunet.com/smcccd;
https://sanmateo.tracdat.com/tracdat/ A. Program Curriculum and
Courses. If your program does not offer curriculum please state
N/A.
Respond to the following:
What new courses (excluding individual Selected Topics [665]
topics and Experimental [680/880] courses) have you added to your
program curriculum in the past academic year? List by Department,
Course Number and Course Title.
If you have not done so already, please email the TracDat
Coordinator to request that these courses to be added to
TracDat.
Have you uploaded SLOs for your new courses in TracDat?
Have you mapped course-level SLOs to PSLOs and ISLOs?
Have you uploaded an assessment method (need not be specific)
for each course?
-
Skyline College Annual Program Planning Page 8 of 13 January
2013
B. Identify Patterns of Curriculum Offerings
6. Response to Previous Annual Program Plan & Review
List any recommendations for the program and your responses to
these recommendations based on previous Annual Program Plan and/or
CTE Professional Accreditation report.
Respond to the following:
What is the planning groups 2-year curriculum cycle of course
offerings by certificates and degrees?
What is the ideal curriculum cycle?
Discuss any issues.
-
Skyline College Annual Program Planning Page 9 of 13 January
2013
7. Action Plan
Provide your action plan based on the analysis and reflections
provided in the previous sections. Note resource requests should be
connected to action plans.
Respond to the following:
Describe data and assessment results for Program Student
Learning Outcomes. Analyze and reflect on assessment results for
Program Student Learning Outcomes and other measures of Program
performance.
Analyze and reflect on other evidence described in previous
sections. Identify the next steps, including any planned changes to
curriculum or pedagogy.
Identify questions that will serve as a focus of inquiry for
next year.
-
Skyline College Annual Program Planning Page 10 of 13 January
2013
8. Resource Identification A. Professional Development needs
B. Office of Planning, Research & Institutional
Effectiveness requests C. Faculty and Staff hiring, Instructional
Equipment and Facilities Requests Complete the following table:
Actions:
List data requests for the Office of Planning, Research &
Institutional Effectiveness.
Explain how the requests will serve the
Student/Program/Division/College needs.
-
Skyline College Annual Program Planning Page 11 of 13 January
2013
Annual Program Planning Resource Needs Program _______________
Date__________
What are the needs? How does this request align
with your assessment of student outcomes?
How does this request align with your action
plan?
What is the estimated cost for facilities and
equipment?
Personnel
1.
2.
3.
Equipment
1.
2.
3.
4.
Facilities
1.
2.
3.
4.
-
Skyline College Annual Program Plan Page 12 of 13 January
2013
APPENDIX A VISION, MISSION, VALUES AND GOALS OF SKYLINE COLLEGE
Please check current catalog for most recent goal statements.
Vision Statement Skyline College inspires a global and diverse
community of learners to achieve intellectual, cultural, social,
economic and personal fulfillment. Mission Statement To empower and
transform a global community of learners. Values Statement
Education is the foundation of our civilized democratic society.
Thus: Campus Climate: We value a campus-wide climate that reflects
a students first philosophy' with mutual respect between all
constituencies and appreciation for diversity. Both instruction and
student services are dedicated to providing every student with an
avenue to success. Open Access: We are committed to the
availability of quality educational programs and services for every
member of our community regardless of level of preparation,
socio-economic status, cultural, religious or ethnic background, or
disability. We are committed to providing students with open access
to programs and responsive student services that enable them to
advance steadily toward their goals. Student Success: We value
students success in achieving their goals, and strengthening their
voices as they transform their lives through their educational
experience. Academic Excellence: We value excellence in all aspects
of our mission as a comprehensive community college offering
preparation for transfer to a baccalaureate institution, workforce
and economic development through career technical education
programs and certificates, Associate of Arts and Associate of
Science degrees, basic skills development, and lifelong learning.
We are committed to academic rigor and quality with relevant,
recent, and evolving curriculum and well-equipped programs that
include new and emerging areas of study. We are dedicated to an
educational climate that values creativity, innovation and freedom
of intellectual exploration, discovery, thought, and exchange of
ideas. Community Connection: We value a deep engagement with the
community we serve and our role as an academic and cultural center
for community including business, industry, labor, non-profits,
government and the arts. We are dedicated to maintaining a college
culture and institutional climate that is warm and welcoming to
all. Shared Governance: We value just, fair, inclusive, and well
understood, transparent governance processes based upon open and
honest communication. Sustainability: We value an institutional
culture that represents a strong commitment to environmental
sustainability and justice. We are committed to the tenets of
sustainability To meet present needs without compromising the
ability of future generations to meet their needs.
-
Skyline College Annual Program Planning Page 13 of 13 January
2013
APPENDIX B
Definition of Terms WSCH: Weekly Student Contact Hours are based
on the first census week of a Fall term. They do not
include second census week data, but they do include all
positive attendance data for the term (converted to WSCH) including
classes which start after the first census
FTE: The full-time equivalent faculty count is determined by the
set of rules provided to each college at
the time the data is requested. Generally, the figures are the
decimal fraction of the teaching hours or units ascribed to the
faculty member for teaching work done. Non-teaching time is
specifically excluded so that it does not affect the value of the
data. Work done by non-certified-personnel is not included.
LOAD: Teaching Load is taken as the ratio of WSCH to FTE N
GRADES: The total number of grades awarded (A+B+C+D+F+CR+NCR+I+W)
RETENTION: The sum of all non-W grades divided by N grades times
100, expressed as % SUCCESS: A+B+C+CR grades divided by N grades
times 100, expressed as %
Skyline CollegeAnnual Program Planning Self-StudyVision
StatementMission StatementValues StatementThus:
Definition of Terms
Sheet1
SKYLINE COLLEGE INSTRUCTIONAL EQUIPMENT LIST 2014-2015
Kinesiology/Athletics/Dance
DivisionDEPT.PriorityITEM#COST/UNITTOTALTOTAL+ 9
%ShipCOSTOtherReq.StartedRec' ItemNotes
KADADAP1ADAP
EquipNA$1,900.00$1,900.00$2,071.00$250.00$2,321.00
KADINDV1Archery EquipNA$1,600.00$1,600.00$1,744.00$1,744.00
KADFITN1Fitness
Equipment14$500.00$7,000.00$7,630.00$1,200.00$8,830.00
KADATH1Ice
machine1$5,800.00$5,800.00$6,322.00$400.00$6,722.00$800Install
KADATH1Thermo
Stimulation1$1,300.00$1,300.00$1,417.00$250.00$1,667.00
KADFITN1Replacement Spinning
Bikes6$1,400.00$8,200.00$8,938.00$400.00$9,338.00$500Assembly and
Install
KADATH1Therapy
Equipment6$300.00$1,800.00$1,962.00$200.00$2,162.00
KADATH1L-Screen1$3,500.00$7,000.00$7,630.00$300.00$7,930.00
KADATH1Badminton
Equipment25$100.00$2,500.00$2,725.00$250.00$2,975.00
KADATH1Blacknight Trainer /
Randomizer1$5,836.00$5,836.00$6,361.24$250.00$6,611.24
KADATH1Basketball Scorers Table /
ChairsNA$13,000.00$13,000.00$14,170.00$1,500.00$15,670.00
KADKAD1Adjunct Office
Desktops6$2,200.00$13,200.00$14,388.00$14,388.00
KADKAD1Division
Lap-Tops2$1,800.00$3,600.00$3,924.00$3,924.00
KADDANC1Costumes$3,000.00$3,000.00$3,270.00
KAD1Total Priority 1$ 75,736.00$82,552.24$5,000.00$
87,552.24$4,300.00$ 91,852.24
Descriptions:
ADAP/Archery Equipment: Replacement of current aids. Requested
as part of the unit plan
Finess Equipment: Several standing pieces are at the end of
their useful life. Requested in unit plan
Thermo Stimulation: Replacement of the current unit which is
over 15 years old. Important piece of equipment to get students
participating so as to meet SLO's. Requested as part of Unit
Plan.
Spinning Bikes: Replacement of the 6 oldest bikes. Second year
of a six year replacement cycle. Requested as part of the unit
Plan.
Thearapy Equipment: A total of six pieces are requested to be
replaced. Current inventory is at the end of its useful life.
Requested as part of unit plan.
Ice machine: Current model is 13 years old and at the end of its
useful life. Were purchased with IE in early 2000's.
Baseball L Screens: We have two screens that need to be
replaced.
Badminton Equipment: Replacing items at end of useful
life.Requested in unit plan.
Adjunct Office Desktops: Computers were purchased / installed in
September 06. They need to be replaced.
Division Lap Tops: Purchased in September 06. They need to be
replaced. Could we get a IPAD or Surface instead? We want to go
paperless for Fitness Testing
Costumes: Necessary for productions. Request is included in unit
plan.
-
Course Assessment Report-- Four Column
SKY Dept - Kinesiology
San Mateo CCCD
Department AssessmentCoordinator:
Jan Fosberg and Kevin Corsiglia
Course Outcomes Means of Assessment & Success Criteria
/Tasks Results Action & Follow-Up
SKY Dept - Kinesiology - SKY ADAP 358 -Adapted Strength
Development- Skills and Concepts - Upon completion of thecourse,
and in the absence of a degenerativedisease process, students will
be able todemonstrate increased muscular strength andendurance, or
in the presence of a degenerativedisease process, demonstrate
either maintained orslowed degradation of muscular strength
andendurance in areas where given the normalcourse of the disease,
decreased muscle strengthand endurance would be expected. (Created
By SKY Dept - Kinesiology)
Course Outcome Status:Active
Assessment Method:Oral and/or Demonstration individually and
insmall groups of proper techniques relative todaily functioning
(standing, sitting, lying,walking, striding with arm swing,
stopping orspeeding up quickly, climbing or descendingstairs) and
safe techniques adapted to disabilityfor using closed chain
equipment (leg press,hamstring curl, seated row, lat
pulldown,gravitron), adaptations for using Nu-Step,elliptical
bikes, treadmill, recumbent bikes andarm/leg cyles, personalized
adaptations fordumbbells, elastic bands, Swiss balls and
variousmethods to stimulate greaterNEUROMUSCULAR brain
connections.Assessment Method
Category:Presentation/PerformanceSuccess Criterion:Successful
Demonstration wins approval toinclude that technique as part of
individualexercise prescription either in class or at home asdaily
homework.Performance Criteria: 50% of Students will becapable of
achieving a 70% or higher on thisexam
02/04/2015 - Of the 100 students enrolled in Spring 14and Fall
15; greater than 80% received a C grade orhigher on examResult
Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2014 - 2015
02/03/2014 - The majority of students who completedthe class
were able to demonstrate individually and insmall groups of proper
techniques relative to dailyfunctioning (standing, sitting, lying,
walking, stridingwith arm swing, stopping or speeding up
quickly,climbing or descending stairs) and safe techniquesadapted
to disability for using closed chain equipment(leg press, hamstring
curl, seated row, lat pulldown,gravitron), adaptations for using
Nu-Step, ellipticalbikes, treadmill, recumbent bikes and arm/leg
cyles,personalized adaptations for dumbbells, elastic bands,Swiss
balls and various methods to stimulate greaterNEUROMUSCULAR brain
connections.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2013 -
2014Resources Needed to Implement Action Plan:While students are
meeting this outcome, thelack of specialized equipment and a
qualifiedaide makes serving additional students difficult.Class
numbers are in the teens and need to staythere to effectively
achieve outcomes.
05/24/2013 - 46 of 47 students (98%) successfullydemonstrated
individually and in small groups propertechniques relative to daily
functioning (standing,sitting, lying, walking, striding with arm
swing,stopping or speeding up quickly, climbing or
03/23/2015 2:23 PM Generated by TracDat a product of Nuventive.
Page 1 of 177
-
Course Outcomes Means of Assessment & Success Criteria
/Tasks Results Action & Follow-Up
descending stairs) and safe techniques adapted todisability for
using closed chain equipment (leg press,hamstring curl, seated row,
lat pulldown, gravitron),adaptations for using Nu-Step, elliptical
bikes,treadmill, recumbent bikes and arm/leg cyles,personalized
adaptations for dumbbells, elastic bands,Swiss balls and various
methods to stimulate greaterNEUROMUSCULAR brain connections.Result
Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013
01/10/2013 - 45 of 50 students (90%) were able todemonstrate
proper techniques relative to dailyfunctioning (standing, sitting,
lying, walking, stridingwith arm swing, stopping or speeding up
quickly,climbing or descending stairs) and safe techniquesadapted
to disability for using closed chain equipment(leg press, hamstring
curl, seated row, lat pulldown,gravitron), adaptations for using
Nu-Step, ellipticalbikes, treadmill, recumbent bikes and arm/leg
cyles,personalized adaptations for dumbbells, elastic bands,Swiss
balls and various methods to stimulate greaterNEUROMUSCULAR brain
connections.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 -
2013
01/20/2011 - 26/31 Students=84% of Students
couldexplain/demonstrate proper techniques for physicalmovement and
use of class machines and equipmentappropriate to their
degenerative disease process.Result Type:Criterion metReporting
Cycle:2010 - 2011Related Documents:SLO 358 Assessment Plan 1 17
11.doc
Assessment Method:Bicep curl repetitions in 30 secondsAssessment
Instrument: Repetitions completedin 30 seconds by females using 3#
and malesusing 5# weights
02/04/2015 - More than 70% of the students whocompleted the
class without physical limitationscompleted 15 or more lifts in 30
secondsResult Type:Criterion met
03/23/2015 2:23 PM Generated by TracDat a product of Nuventive.
Page 2 of 177
https://sanmateo.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=YoB9DDcZfKzy
-
Course Outcomes Means of Assessment & Success Criteria
/Tasks Results Action & Follow-Up
Assessment Method Category:Presentation/PerformanceSuccess
Criterion:70% of students without physical limitations willcomplete
15 or more lifts in 30 seconds
Reporting Cycle:2014 - 2015
02/03/2014 - Over 70% of students without physicallimitations
were able to complete 15 or more bicep curlrepititions. Repetitions
completed in 30 seconds byfemales using 3# and males using 5#
weightsResult Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2013 - 2014
05/24/2013 - 42 of 42 students, 100%, without physicallimitation
were able to complete 15 repetitions in 30seconds with females
using 3# and males using 5#weights.Result Type:Criterion
metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013
01/10/2013 - 49 of 50 students were able to meet thecriteria by
completing 15 or more bicep curl repetitionsin 30 seconds
Assessment Instrument: Repetitionscompleted in 30 seconds by
females using 3# and malesusing 5# weightsResult Type:Criterion
metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013
01/20/2011 - 27 /27 Students= 100% of students werecapable of
lifting 3# or 5# respectively 15 or more liftsin 30 secondsResult
Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2010 - 2011Related Documents:SLO
358 Assessment Plan 1 17 11.doc
07/31/2009 - Greater than 50% showed improvement,maintenance or
slowed degradation of muscularstrength, endurance, balance, gait
and cardiovascularefficency.Result Type:Criterion metReporting
Cycle:
03/23/2015 2:23 PM Generated by TracDat a product of Nuventive.
Page 3 of 177
https://sanmateo.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=YoB9DDcZfKzy
-
Course Outcomes Means of Assessment & Success Criteria
/Tasks Results Action & Follow-Up
2009 - 2010Related Documents:Chip ADAP Summer 2009PORTFOLIO 9 17
10 (2).pdf
Assessment Method:Sit and stand for 30 seconds (wheelchair
andrecent surgery exempt)Assessment Instrument: Sit, stomp feet
andstand the maximum number of times possiblewith physical
limitations
Assessment Method Category:Presentation/PerformanceSuccess
Criterion:70% of students without physical limitations willbe able
to sit and stand 10 or more times in 30seconds
02/04/2015 - Over 70% of the students who completedthe class
without physical limitations were able to sitand stand 10 or more
times in 30 secondsResult Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2014 -
2015
02/03/2014 - All students who completed the class whodid not
have a physical limitation which prevented themfrom completing the
assessment were able to sit, standand stomp feet as a measurement
of agility and balance.Result Type:Criterion metReporting
Cycle:2013 - 2014
05/24/2013 - 30 of 30 students, 100%, were able to sitand stand
10 or more times in 30 seconds(wheelchairand recent surgery exempt)
Assessment Instrument: Sit,stomp feet and stand the maximum number
of timespossible with physical limitations.Result Type:Criterion
metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013
01/10/2013 - 28 of 31 students (90%) without physicallimitations
were able to sit and stand 10 or more timesin 30 secondsResult
Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013
01/20/2011 - 15 /15 Students= 100% of studentswithout limiting
physical conditions were able to sitand stand 10 or more times in
30 secondsResult Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2010 -
2011Related Documents:
03/23/2015 2:23 PM Generated by TracDat a product of Nuventive.
Page 4 of 177
https://sanmateo.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=UNZ5Fd47hlFg
https://sanmateo.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=UNZ5Fd47hlFg
-
Course Outcomes Means of Assessment & Success Criteria
/Tasks Results Action & Follow-Up
SLO 358 Assessment Plan 1 17 11.doc
Assessment Method:In-class chair exercises; Assessment
Instrument:Daily participation points in progressiveexercises
Assessment Method Category:Presentation/PerformanceSuccess
Criterion:70% of students will complete 70% of in-classchair
exercises
02/04/2015 - All students were able to earn progresspoints for
performance of chair exercises.Result Type:Criterion metReporting
Cycle:2014 - 2015
05/24/2013 - 47 of 47 students who completed the
classdemonstrated improved flexibility, muscular staminaand general
strength as compared to pre-test /presentation assessment.Result
Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013
01/10/2013 - 47 of 47 students (100%) met the criteriaby
completing in-class chair exercises; AssessmentInstrument: Daily
participation assessment inprogressive exercisesResult
Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013
01/20/2011 - 28 / 31 Students = 90% of studentscompleted 70% of
in-class workoutsResult Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2010 -
2011Related Documents:SLO 358 Assessment Plan 1 17 11.doc
SKY Dept - Kinesiology - SKY ADAP 359 -Balance/Functional
Movement...- Skills and Concepts - Upon completion of thecourse,
and in the absence of a degenerativedisease process, students will
be able todemonstrate increased balance and functionalmovement, or
in the presence of a degenerativedisease process, demonstrate
either maintained orslowed degradation of balance and
functional
Assessment Method:Assessment Method:Individual verbal
andkinesthetic testing of proper techniques for goodstride and gait
function, how to balance on onefoot from high to low with a reach,
how tochange stride and direction to avoid falling orcolliding with
obstacles.Assessment Method Category:Presentation/Performance
02/04/2015 - Slightly more than 95% of students wereable to
successfully explain and demonstrate propertechniques for gait,
stride and balance appropriate tostairs, hills, uneven surfaces and
unexpected obstaclescommon in everyday lifeResult Type:Criterion
metReporting Cycle:2014 - 2015
03/23/2015 2:23 PM Generated by TracDat a product of Nuventive.
Page 5 of 177
https://sanmateo.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=YoB9DDcZfKzy
https://sanmateo.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=YoB9DDcZfKzy
-
Course Outcomes Means of Assessment & Success Criteria
/Tasks Results Action & Follow-Up
movement in areas where given the normalcourse of the disease,
decreased balance andfunctional movement would be expected.(Created
By SKY Dept - Kinesiology)
Course Outcome Status:Active
Success Criterion:70% of Students will be able to
successfullyexplain and demonstrate proper techniques forgait,
stride and balance appropriate to stairs, hills,uneven surfaces and
unexpected obstaclescommon in everyday life.
02/03/2014 - Over 70% of students were able tosuccessfully
explain and demonstrate proper techniquesfor gait, stride and
balance appropriate to stairs, hills,uneven surfaces and unexpected
obstacles common ineveryday life.Result Type:Criterion metReporting
Cycle:2013 - 2014Resources Needed to Implement Action
Plan:Limitations on space, equipment and personnelimpact success
rates and number of students whocan enroll.
05/24/2013 - 39 of 39 students successfully completedverbal and
kinesthetic testing of proper techniques forgood stride and gait
function, how to balance on onefoot from high to low with a reach,
how to changestride and direction to avoid falling or colliding
withobstacles.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 -
2013
01/10/2013 - 43 of 44 students successfully completedthe
assessment listed below.
Presentation/Performance - AssessmentMethod:Individual verbal
and kinesthetic testing ofproper techniques for good stride and
gait function,how to balance on one foot from high to low with
areach, how to change stride and direction to avoidfalling or
colliding with obstacles.Result Type:Criterion metReporting
Cycle:2012 - 2013
01/20/2011 - 15/15 =100% of ambulatory students wereable to
lengthen their stride or widen/narrow theirstride, hop on one foot
and quickly change footworkpatterns to adapt to surfaces changes
and unexpectedphysical obstaclesResult Type:Criterion metReporting
Cycle:2010 - 2011
03/23/2015 2:23 PM Generated by TracDat a product of Nuventive.
Page 6 of 177
-
Course Outcomes Means of Assessment & Success Criteria
/Tasks Results Action & Follow-Up
Related Documents:SLO 359 ASSESSMENT PLAN 1 1711.doc
Assessment Method:Two Minute Stepping Cardio TestAssessment
Instrument: Number of steps inplace with knee lifted half way
between the kneeand hip of the standing leg in two minutes
Assessment Method Category:Presentation/PerformanceSuccess
Criterion:70% of ambulatory students will step 120 ormore
steps/complete the two minute step test
02/04/2015 - 100% of ambulatory students were able tostep 120 or
more steps/complete the two minute steptestResult Type:Criterion
metReporting Cycle:2014 - 2015
02/03/2014 - Of the ambulatory students, 70% wereable to
complete 120 steps or more in a timedassessment.Result
Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2013 - 2014
05/24/2013 - 36 pof 36 students who could be assessed,were able
to demonstrated improvement and / orcomplete 120 or more steps in
the two minute step test.Steps are considered steps in place with
knee lifted halfway between the knee and hip of the standing leg
intwo minutesResult Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 -
2013
01/10/2013 - 24 of 28 students successfully completedthe Two
Minute Stepping Cardio Test Assessment. It isthe number of steps in
place with knee lifted half waybetween the knee and hip of the
standing leg in twominutes. Ambulatory students will step 120 or
moresteps/complete the two minute step test
Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013
01/20/2011 - 15/15 Students = 100% of ambulatoryStudents were
able to complete the 2 minute test and/ordo 120 steps or moreResult
Type:Criterion met
03/23/2015 2:23 PM Generated by TracDat a product of Nuventive.
Page 7 of 177
https://sanmateo.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=KmGcE7KJSCQ2
https://sanmateo.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=KmGcE7KJSCQ2
-
Course Outcomes Means of Assessment & Success Criteria
/Tasks Results Action & Follow-Up
Reporting Cycle:2010 - 2011Related Documents:SLO 359 ASSESSMENT
PLAN 1 1711.doc
01/20/2011 - 15/15 Students = 100% of ambulatoryStudents were
able to complete the 2 minute test and/ordo 120 steps or moreResult
Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2010 - 2011Related Documents:SLO
359 ASSESSMENT PLAN 1 1711.doc
Assessment Method:Seated Measurement of shoulder, hip
andhamstring FlexibilityAssessment Instrument: Distance of finger
tipsapart/overlapping with R arm reach overshoulder and L arm reach
behind back followedby L arm over shoulder and R arm behind
back;distance of R and L heels from waist for hips;and number of
inches both arms reach toward orbeyond toes
Assessment Method Category:Pre and post testingSuccess
Criterion:70 % of the Students who can ambulate withoutan assistive
aid will measure less than 20 inchesin the shoulder reaches, less
than 15 inches in theheel to waist reaches and not more than
fiveinches negative touching the toes.
02/04/2015 - Over 90 % of the students who canambulate without
an assistive measured less than 20inches in the shoulder reaches,
less than 15 inches inthe heel to waist reaches and not more than
five inchesnegative touching the toes.Result Type:Criterion
metReporting Cycle:2014 - 2015
05/24/2013 - 42 of 42 students assessed, 100%, whocould ambulate
without an assistive aid measured lessthan 20 inches in the
shoulder reaches, less than 15inches in the heel to waist reaches
and not more thanfive inches negative touching the toes.Result
Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013
01/10/2013 - 36 of 36 students successfully completedshoulder,
hip and hamstring Flexibility Assessment (preand post test) using
distance of finger tipsapart/overlapping with R arm reach over
shoulder and Larm reach behind back followed by L arm overshoulder
and R arm behind back; distance of R and Lheels from waist for
hips; and number of inches botharms reach toward or beyond
toesResult Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:
03/23/2015 2:23 PM Generated by TracDat a product of Nuventive.
Page 8 of 177
https://sanmateo.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=KmGcE7KJSCQ2
https://sanmateo.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=KmGcE7KJSCQ2
https://sanmateo.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=KmGcE7KJSCQ2
https://sanmateo.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=KmGcE7KJSCQ2
-
Course Outcomes Means of Assessment & Success Criteria
/Tasks Results Action & Follow-Up
2012 - 2013
01/20/2011 - 13/15 Students = 87% of ambulatoryStudents improved
in their flexibilityResult Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2010 -
2011Related Documents:SLO 359 ASSESSMENT PLAN 1 1711.doc
Assessment Method:Standing Balance30 seconds R/LAssessment
Instrument: Time balancedconsecutively in 30 seconds on R/L feet
wherepossible
Assessment Method Category:Pre and post testingSuccess
Criterion:70% of Students capable of standing unassistedwill be
able to balance for 10 seconds or longeron each foot.
02/04/2015 - 100% of students capable of standingunassisted were
able to balance for 10 seconds orlonger on each foot.Result
Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2014 - 2015
02/03/2014 - Less than 70% of students were able tobalance
unassisted for 10 seconds or longer on eitherfoot.Result
Type:Criterion not metReporting Cycle:2013 - 2014Resources Needed
to Implement Action Plan:The need for specialized equipment such as
avibration platform or Nu-Step machines wouldmake a big difference.
The other issue is toreally improve in balance and gait you
needmore assisted movement which requires aides.
05/24/2013 - 24 of 24 students who could be assessed,100%, were
capabale of standing unassisted andbalance for 10 seconds or longer
on each foot and / ordemonstrate improvement based on pre-test
assessment.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013
01/10/2013 - 29 of 31 students successfully completedthe
assessment. Assessment is Standing Balance30seconds R/L Assessment
Instrument: Time balancedconsecutively in 30 seconds on R/L feet
where possible.Students capable of standing unassisted will be able
tobalance for 10 seconds or longer on each foot
03/23/2015 2:23 PM Generated by TracDat a product of Nuventive.
Page 9 of 177
https://sanmateo.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=KmGcE7KJSCQ2
https://sanmateo.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=KmGcE7KJSCQ2
-
Course Outcomes Means of Assessment & Success Criteria
/Tasks Results Action & Follow-Up
Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013
01/20/2011 - 15/15 Students= 100% of Students werecapable of
balancing on both right and left feet for 10secondsResult
Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2010 - 2011Related Documents:SLO
359 ASSESSMENT PLAN 1 1711.doc
SKY Dept - Kinesiology - SKY COMB 301 -Beginning Wrestling-
Skills, Fitness and Concepts - Upon successfulcompletion of this
course students will:Demonstrate tactical, technical, fitness and
motorskills at a basic level in the sport of wrestling anduse
critical thinking to apply skills in acompetitive environment.
(Created By SKY Dept- Kinesiology)
Course Outcome Status:Active
Assessment Method:Participation: Students are evaluated based
onthe division instituted Fitness Testing Program invarious
categories related to strength, endurance,efficiency, flexibility
and body composition.Assessment Method Category:Pre and post
testingSuccess Criterion:Success Criterion: Of the students who
completethe course, 80% will show improvement in 2categories.
02/04/2015 - 100% of students who completed thecourse showed
improvement in muscular endurance andthe step-test.Result
Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2014 - 2015
06/05/2013 - 20 of 22 students showed improved bodycomposition
and 18 of 22 improved flexibility. Therigor of the class, at least
2.5 hours of high intensityactivity, was responsible for results.
Students who didnot improve missed too much class due to injury
orpersonal necessity.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012
- 2013
Assessment Method:Exam: Students will be evaluated visually
usinga check-point system to grade performance(poor, satisfactory,
excellent) on the propertechnique in executing a drill match at
abeginning level. Assessment will includeperformance of the basic
take down, stand upescape, and set-up.Assessment Method
Category:Exam
02/04/2015 - 100% of students at the beginning levelimproved
skills scores to a level of satisfactory orhigher by the end of the
semester.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2014 - 2015
06/05/2013 - 20 of 22 students shoed improvement inbasic skill
levels based on a three point rating scale.
03/23/2015 2:23 PM Generated by TracDat a product of Nuventive.
Page 10 of 177
https://sanmateo.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=KmGcE7KJSCQ2
https://sanmateo.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=KmGcE7KJSCQ2
-
Course Outcomes Means of Assessment & Success Criteria
/Tasks Results Action & Follow-Up
Success Criterion:Success Criterion: Of the students who
completethe course, 80% will show improvement in thebasic skills
and have an average rating ofsatisfactory or higher.
Class emphasis is on skill development and not strategythus
result is expected.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 -
2013
Assessment Method:Final: Students will be evaluated on
tactical,technical, fitness and skills in a live wrestlingmatch
situation based on weight classificationand experience.Assessment
Method Category:Capstone Assignment/ProjectSuccess
Criterion:Success Criterion: Of the students who finish thecourse,
80% will be competitive (based ontechnique, fitness and strategy)
in their matches.
02/04/2015 - All students participating in final matcheswere
competitive and met criteria. Students wereclassified by weight and
assessed on technique prior tocompetition.Result Type:Criterion
metReporting Cycle:2014 - 2015
06/05/2013 - 21 of 22 students successfully completedthe
tactical exam with a grade of 80% or higher.Students were grouped
by weight and skill level.Result Type:Criterion metReporting
Cycle:2012 - 2013
SKY Dept - Kinesiology - SKY COMB 302 -Intermediate Wrestling-
Skills, Concepts and Fitness - Upon successfulcompletion of this
course students will:Demonstrate tactical, technical, fitness and
motorskills at an advanced level in the sport ofwrestling and use
critical thinking to apply skillsin a competitive environment.
(Created By SKYDept - Kinesiology)
Course Outcome Status:Active
Assessment Method:Participation: Students are evaluated based
onthe division instituted Fitness Testing Program invarious
categories related to strength, endurance,efficiency, flexibility
and body composition.Assessment Method Category:Pre and post
testingSuccess Criterion:Success Criterion: Of the students who
completethe course, 80% will show improvement in 2categories.
02/04/2015 - 100% of students showed improvement inthe musuclar
strength and step-test assessments.Result Type:Criterion
metReporting Cycle:2014 - 2015
06/05/2013 - 10 of 12 students showed improved bodycomposition
and 12 of 12 improved muscularendurance. The rigor of the class, at
least 2.5 hours ofhigh intensity activity, was responsible for
results.Students who did not improve missed too much classdue to
injury or personal necessity.Result Type:Criterion metReporting
Cycle:2012 - 2013
Assessment Method:Exam: Students will be evaluated visually
usinga check-point system to grade performance(poor, satisfactory,
excellent) on the propertechnique in executing a drill match at
an
02/04/2015 - 100% of students completing the coursedemonstrated
improvement based on visual assessment.Result Type:Criterion
metReporting Cycle:
03/23/2015 2:23 PM Generated by TracDat a product of Nuventive.
Page 11 of 177
-
Course Outcomes Means of Assessment & Success Criteria
/Tasks Results Action & Follow-Up
intermediate level. Assessment will includeperformance of the
intermediate take down,stand up escape, and set-up.Assessment
Method Category:ExamSuccess Criterion:Success Criterion: Of the
students who completethe course, 80% will show improvement
inintermediate skills and have an average rating ofsatisfactory or
higher.
2014 - 2015
06/05/2013 - 10 of 12 students shoed improvement inbasic skill
levels based on a three point rating scale.Class emphasis is on
skill development and not strategythus result is expected.Result
Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013
Assessment Method:Final: Students will be evaluated on
tactical,technical, fitness and skills in a live wrestlingmatch
situation based on weight classificationand experience.Assessment
Method Category:Capstone Assignment/ProjectSuccess
Criterion:Success Criterion: Of the students who finish thecourse,
80% will be competitive (based ontechnique, fitness and strategy)
in their matches.
02/04/2015 - 100% of students were successful inhaving a
competitive final match. Students wereclassified by weight and
technique.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2014 - 2015
06/05/2013 - 12 of 12 students successfully completedthe
tactical exam with a grade of 80% or higher.Students were grouped
by weight and skill level.Result Type:Criterion metReporting
Cycle:2012 - 2013
SKY Dept - Kinesiology - SKY COMB 401 -Self Defense- Fitness and
wellness - Identify and assess theircurrent fitness level and alter
or modify specificwellness or fitness practices in order to
improvebody composition /flexibility/
cardiovascularfitness/muscular endurance / muscular strengthrelated
to performance in the practice of selfdefense. (Created By SKY Dept
- Kinesiology)
Course Outcome Status:Inactive
Assessment Method:Final written knowledge exam.55 question
written exam
Assessment Method Category:ExamSuccess Criterion:90% of students
will pass with a 90% score
01/11/2010 - Of the 22 students who completed thecourse, 17
received a score of 90% or higher on thewritten final exam covering
fitness principles.Result Type:Criterion not metReporting
Cycle:2009 - 2010Resources Needed to Implement Action
Plan:Impliment clicker technology and assessstudents continually
throughout the semester.
Assessment Method:Fitness Tests.Pre and post test
comparison.
Assessment Method Category:Pre and post testingSuccess
Criterion: 70% of students will increase flexibility by 1
01/11/2010 - Of the 22 students who completed theclass, all 22
improved Fitness scores by at least 1 inchusing the Pre and Post
test data from the PEEPevaluationResult Type:Criterion metReporting
Cycle:2009 - 2010
03/23/2015 2:23 PM Generated by TracDat a product of Nuventive.
Page 12 of 177
-
Course Outcomes Means of Assessment & Success Criteria
/Tasks Results Action & Follow-Up
inch at the end of the semester
Assessment Method:Quiz on fitness and wellness using
ResponseCards
Assessment Method Category:ExamSuccess Criterion:70% will
achieve a score of 70% or higher
01/11/2010 - NA - Technology not available until toolate in the
semester to implement.Result Type:InconclusiveReporting Cycle:2009
- 2010
04/04/2013 - Reassess when responsecards are available to
faculty member
Action Plan Category:Conduct Further Assessment
SKY Dept - Kinesiology - SKY COMB 401 -Self Defense- Skills and
performance - Demonstrate thefundamental skills necessary to
perform andprogress at a beginning level in the practice ofself
defense. (Created By SKY Dept -Kinesiology)
Course Outcome Status:Active
Assessment Method:Skills Tests10 point scale- checklist
Assessment Method Category:Presentation/PerformanceSuccess
Criterion:70% will earn a C or better.
02/03/2014 - Over 80% of the students whosuccessfully completed
the class passed the skillschecklist related to self-defense
techniques such asblocking, rolling, avoidance, etc....Result
Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2013 - 2014
01/11/2010 - Of the 22 students who completed theclass 16
received a 70% or better on the skills checklist.(72%)Result
Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2009 - 2010
Assessment Method:Final demonstrationFaculty and peer evaluation
using a checklist
Assessment Method Category:Presentation/PerformanceSuccess
Criterion: 70% will earn a C or better
02/03/2014 - Over 80% of the students who completedthe class
were able to complete the final successfullydemonstrating
self-defense techniques.Result Type:Criterion metReporting
Cycle:2013 - 2014Resources Needed to Implement Action Plan:Class
seems to be especially popular withwomen. It may be worth
developing on-lineresources for students as well. Teacher
requestsprofessional development on latest techniques to
03/23/2015 2:23 PM Generated by TracDat a product of Nuventive.
Page 13 of 177
-
Course Outcomes Means of Assessment & Success Criteria
/Tasks Results Action & Follow-Up
help incorporate information.
01/11/2010 - All 22 students earned a 70% or higher.Result
Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2009 - 2010Resources Needed to
Implement Action Plan:Need to reveiw peer evfaluation piece.
Itinvolves students and gets them to evaluate andthink critically.
But, they are extremely reluctantto critically evaluate peers which
throws off thescoring.
Assessment Method:Skills tests/Final DemonstrationChecklist for
application of skills used in finaldemonstration.
Assessment Method Category:Presentation/PerformanceSuccess
Criterion:70% will show progression in their skills fromthe skills
test to the final demonstration.
01/11/2010 - 16 of 22 who completed the coursereceived a grade
of 70% or higher.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2009 -
2010Resources Needed to Implement Action Plan:Success was tied to
participation in course andgeneral fitness level. Need to
incorporate somefitness training into skills development
SKY Dept - Kinesiology - SKY COMB 404 -Beginning Shotokan
Karate- Skills, Concepts and Fitness - Demonstrate thefundamental
skills, knowledge, concepts andvocabulary used in the practice of
ShotokanKarate to perform and progress at a beginninglevel in this
art. (Created By SKY Dept - Kinesiology)
Course Outcome Status:Active
Assessment Method:A final exam on the 10 basic blocking,
punchingand kicking techniques. Students will beevaluated on a 10
point scale.Assessment Method Category:ExamSuccess
Criterion:Success Criterion: 70% of the students whocomplete the
course will rate above 6.0 as anaverage score.
02/04/2015 - 90% of the students who completed thecourse had a
rating above 6.0 as an average score.Result Type:Criterion
metReporting Cycle:2014 - 2015
01/31/2014 - Of the 21 students who completed thecourse 16 were
able to complete the 10 basic blocking,punching and kicking
techniques with a 6 or higherrating on the 10 point rubric.Result
Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2013 - 2014
06/06/2013 - 16 of 16 Students = 100 % of Studentsreceived a
score of 6 or higher on the exam onblocking, punching and kicking
techniques.Result Type:Criterion met
03/23/2015 2:23 PM Generated by TracDat a product of Nuventive.
Page 14 of 177
-
Course Outcomes Means of Assessment & Success Criteria
/Tasks Results Action & Follow-Up
Reporting Cycle:2012 - 2013
12/18/2012 - 17 of 17 students received a score of 6 orhigher on
the exam. The exam consisted of thefollowing:
A final exam on the 10 basic blocking, punching andkicking
techniques. Students will be evaluated on a 10point scale.Result
Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013
12/17/2010 - Assessment Method: Final Exam - BasicsA final exam
on the 10 basic blocking, punching andkicking techniques. Students
will be evaluated on a 10point scale.
Success Criterion:70% of the students who complete the course
will rateabove 6.0 as an average score.
Results: 14 of 15 Students or 93% scored 6.0 or higheron the
exam.
Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2010 - 2011Related
Documents:SLOAC Report 404 Fall 10.doc
Assessment Method:A final exam on the individual performance
ofthe Shotokan Kata appropriate to the student?sskill level.
Students will be evaluated on a 10point scale.Assessment Method
Category:ExamSuccess Criterion: Success Criterion: 70% of the
students whocomplete the course will rate above 6.0 as anaverage
score.
02/04/2015 - 90% of the students who completed thecourse rated
above 6.0 as an average score.Result Type:Criterion metReporting
Cycle:2014 - 2015
01/31/2014 - 18 or 21 students seperated by leveldemonstrated
proficiency (C or higher performance) ofthe Shotokan KataResult
Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2013 - 2014
03/23/2015 2:23 PM Generated by TracDat a product of Nuventive.
Page 15 of 177
https://sanmateo.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=yeBW2aA4l6gQ
-
Course Outcomes Means of Assessment & Success Criteria
/Tasks Results Action & Follow-Up
06/06/2013 - 15 of 16 Students = 94 % of Studentsreceived a
score of 6 or higher on the exam ratingstudent skills in
competition based on level.Result Type:Criterion metReporting
Cycle:2012 - 2013
12/18/2012 - 16 of 17 students received a score of 6 orhigher on
the final exam. The final exam consisted ofan assessment on the
individual performance of theShotokan Kata appropriate to the
students skill level.Students were evaluated on a 10 point
scale.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013
Assessment Method:Pre and Post Fitness test administered by
thedivision. Students will be evaluated onimprovement.Assessment
Method Category:Pre and post testingSuccess Criterion:Success
Criterion: 70% of the students whocomplete the course will improve
in 2 of thetesting areas.
02/04/2015 - 100% of students improved in themuscular endurance
and step-test categories.Result Type:Criterion metReporting
Cycle:2014 - 2015
01/31/2014 - All 21 students who completed the classshowed
improvement in at least two of five fitnessareas based on the
pre-test v. post-test. Most studentsshowed improvement in muscular
endurance andflexibility.Result Type:Criterion metReporting
Cycle:2013 - 2014
06/06/2013 - Results: 16 of 16 Students = 100% ofStudents
improved their flexibility.Results: 14 of 16 Students = 88% of
Studentsimproved their muscular endurance.
Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013
12/18/2012 - 15 of 18 students improved flexibility and16 of 18
students improved muscular endurance usingresults from the pre and
post test from PEEPResult Type:
03/23/2015 2:23 PM Generated by TracDat a product of Nuventive.
Page 16 of 177
-
Course Outcomes Means of Assessment & Success Criteria
/Tasks Results Action & Follow-Up
Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013
SKY Dept - Kinesiology - SKY COMB 405 -Int. & Adv. Shotokan
Karate- Concepts, Skills and Fitness - Demonstrate
theintermediate/advanced skills, knowledge,concepts and vocabulary
used in the practice ofShotokan Karate to perform and progress at
anintermediate / advanced level in this art. (Created By SKY Dept -
Kinesiology)
Course Outcome Status:Active
Assessment Method:A final exam on intermediate/advanced
blocking,punching and kicking techniques. Students willbe evaluated
on a 10 point scale.Assessment Method Category:ExamSuccess
Criterion:Success Criterion: 70% of the students whocomplete the
course will rate above 6.0 as anaverage score.
02/04/2015 - 90% of the students who completed thecourse rated
above 6.0 as an average score.Result Type:Criterion metReporting
Cycle:2014 - 2015
06/06/2013 - : 5 of 5 Students = 100 % of Studentsreceived a
score of 6 or higher on the exam ratinginteremediate advanced level
blocking, punching andkicking.Result Type:Criterion metReporting
Cycle:2012 - 2013
12/18/2012 - 3 of 3 students received a score of 6 orhigher on
the exam.A final exam that consisted of anevaluation of
intermediate/advanced blocking,punching and kicking techniques.
Students wereevaluated on a 10 point scale.Result Type:Criterion
metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013
12/16/2010 - Assessment Method: Final Exam - BasicsA final exam
on the 10 basic, intermediate andadvanced blocking, punching and
kicking techniques.Students will be evaluated on a 10 point
scale.
Success Criterion:70% of the students who complete the course
will rateabove 6.0 as an average score.
Results: 10 of 10 Students or 100% scored 6.0 or higheron the
exam.
Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2010 - 2011
03/23/2015 2:23 PM Generated by TracDat a product of Nuventive.
Page 17 of 177
-
Course Outcomes Means of Assessment & Success Criteria
/Tasks Results Action & Follow-Up
Related Documents:SLOAC Report 405 Fall 10.doc
Assessment Method:A final exam on the individual performance
ofthe Shotokan Kata appropriate to the student?sskill level.
Students will be evaluated on a 10point scale.Assessment Method
Category:ExamSuccess Criterion:Success Criterion: 70% of the
students whocomplete the course will rate above 6.0 as anaverage
score.
02/04/2015 - 90% of the students who completed thecourse rated
above 6.0 as an average score.Result Type:Criterion metReporting
Cycle:2014 - 2015
06/06/2013 - 5 of 5 Students = 100 % of Studentsreceived a score
of 6 or higher on the exam based onskill level in
competition.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 -
2013
12/18/2012 - 3 of 3 students received a score of 6 orhigher on a
final exam on the individual performanceof the Shotokan Kata
appropriate to the students skilllevel. Students were evaluated on
a 10 point scale.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 -
2013
Assessment Method:Pre and Post Fitness test administered by
thedivision. Students will be evaluated onimprovement.Assessment
Method Category:Pre and post testingSuccess Criterion:Success
Criterion: 70% of the students whocomplete the course will improve
in 2 of thetesting areas.
02/04/2015 - 100% of students showed improvement inmuscular
endurance and step test categories.Result Type:Criterion
metReporting Cycle:2014 - 2015
06/06/2013 - Results: 5 of 5 Students = 100% ofStudents improved
their flexibility.Results: 5 of 5 Students = 100% of Students
improvedtheir muscular endurance.
Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013
12/18/2012 - 3 of 4 students improved flexibility and 4of 4
students improved muscular endurance. Results arebased on data from
pre and post test on the PEEPexam.Result Type:
03/23/2015 2:23 PM Generated by TracDat a product of Nuventive.
Page 18 of 177
https://sanmateo.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=pnjhmj1TDBxG
-
Course Outcomes Means of Assessment & Success Criteria
/Tasks Results Action & Follow-Up
Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013
SKY Dept - Kinesiology - SKY FITN 106 -Varsity Conditioning-
Fitness, Concepts and Techniques - Identify andbuild individual /
team skills related toconditioning programs for specific sports
,evaluation of various techniques, use ofequipment, scientific
knowledge of conditioning,and improve / maintain acceptable and
healthybody composition, flexibility, muscular strength,muscular
endurance and flexibility. (Created BySKY Dept - Kinesiology)
Course Outcome Status:Active
Assessment Method:Skills testing based on strength and
endurancecriteriaAssessment Method Category:Pre and post
testingSuccess Criterion:That 80% or more of the students that
completethe class with no physical restrictions will
showimprovement in 5 out of 6 categories.
03/16/2015 - In all secions, students showed at greaterthan 80%
rate inprovement in strength, endurance,agility, speed and
efficiency.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2014 - 2015
06/06/2013 - Results: 17/19 Students = 89% ofStudents who
complete the class with no physicalrestrictions will showed
improvements in 5 out of 6categories. Categories were based on
muscular power,speed, endurance, velocity, intensity and
sustainability.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 -
2013
02/08/2011 - 32 of 32 students (100%) of studentsshowed
improvement on pre and post testing (skillstesting based on
strength and endurance criteria).
Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2010 - 2011Related
Documents:SLOAC FITN 106_Fall_ 2010 Sky.doc
Assessment Method:Division Fitness Pre and Post TestsAssessment
Method Category:Pre and post testingSuccess Criterion:80% of the
students who complete the class withno physical restrictions will
show improvementin 3 areas of the division fitness test.
06/06/2013 - Results: 16/19 = 84% of Studentsimproved (lowered)
their systolic and diastolic bloodpressure.Results: 17/19= 89% of
Students improved their scoreson the cardiovascular endurance test
(step test).Results: 18/19 = 94% of Students improved
(increased)their core strength as measure by sit up testing.
Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013
03/23/2015 2:23 PM Generated by TracDat a product of Nuventive.
Page 19 of 177
https://sanmateo.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=lGa6yj1eHgZx
-
Course Outcomes Means of Assessment & Success Criteria
/Tasks Results Action & Follow-Up
02/08/2011 - 32 of 32 students (100%) showedimprovement in at
least half of the tested areas ondivision pre and post fitness
tests..
Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2010 - 2011Related
Documents:SLOAC FITN 106_Fall_ 2010 Sky.doc
Assessment Method:Students will be examined visually, verbally
andkinesthetically in order to make sure they haveassimilated
concepts and can apply those toimprove sport specific
performance.Assessment Method Category:ExamSuccess Criterion:80% of
students will demonstrate mastery ofconcepts and application by
scoring 75% orbetter on exam.
03/16/2015 - In all sections over 90% of the studentsscored
above 75% on mastery and application ofconcepts as related to a
specific VARS activity.Result Type:Criterion metReporting
Cycle:2014 - 2015
06/06/2013 - Results: 18/19 = 94% of studentsdemonstrated
mastery of concepts and application byscoring 75% or better on
exam. Exam was based onsoccer specific skills and
conditioning.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 -
2013
02/08/2011 - 32 of 32 (100%) students passed the finalskills
tests on improvement of sport specificperformance
Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2010 - 2011Related
Documents:SLOAC FITN 106_Fall_ 2010 Sky.doc
SKY Dept - Kinesiology - SKY FITN 107 -Intercollegiate Fitness -
Fitness Assessment -Upon successful completion of this
coursestudent will be able to:Identify and assess current fitness
level as it
Assessment Method:Skills testing based on strength and
endurancecriteriaAssessment Method Category:Pre and post
testing
03/16/2015 - Over 90% of the students who completedthe course
demonsrated improvement in strength,endurance, speed, agility and
flexibilityResult Type:Criterion met
03/23/2015 2:23 PM Generated by TracDat a product of Nuventive.
Page 20 of 177
https://sanmateo.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=lGa6yj1eHgZx
https://sanmateo.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=lGa6yj1eHgZx
-
Course Outcomes Means of Assessment & Success Criteria
/Tasks Results Action & Follow-Up
pertains to student?s individual sport and alter ormodify
specific fitness practices in order tomaintain performance.
(Created By SKY Dept - Kinesiology)
Start Date:07/27/2012
Course Outcome Status:Active
Success Criterion:That 80% or more of the students that
completethe class with no physical restrictions will
showimprovement in 5 out of 6 categories.
Reporting Cycle:2014 - 2015
01/31/2014 - Five sections of FITN 107 were offeredwith much
improved results. Over 80% of studentsimproved in all categories.
Those who did not werelimited by injury. The availability of a
second certifiedtrainer greatly improved return to class time
withtreatment and injury prevention exercises.Result Type:Criterion
metReporting Cycle:2013 - 2014
06/06/2013 - Results: 87% (13 of 15) of studentsscored 70% or
better on strength and endurance skills.Those skills were bench
press, lat pull down, bicep curl,tricep extension, squat, toe
raise.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013
06/06/2013 - Results: 24/26 Students = 92% ofStudents who
complete the class with no physicalrestrictions will showed
improvements in 5 out of 6categories.Result Type:Criterion
metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013
12/11/2012 - 77.2 % (17 of 22) students showedimprovement in 5
out of 6 categories of strength andendurance measured through pre
and post testing.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 -
2013
Assessment Method:Division Fitness Pre and Post TestsAssessment
Method Category:Pre and post testingSuccess Criterion:80% of the
students who complete the class withno physical restrictions will
show improvementin 3 areas of the division fitness test.
06/06/2013 - Results: 87% (13 of 15) of studentsshowed
improvement in muscular strength, muscularendurance and body
composition.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 -
2013
06/06/2013 - Results: 23/26 = 84% of Studentsimproved (lowered)
their systolic and diastolic blood
03/23/2015 2:23 PM Generated by TracDat a product of Nuventive.
Page 21 of 177
-
Course Outcomes Means of Assessment & Success Criteria
/Tasks Results Action & Follow-Up
pressure.Results: 26/26= 89% of Students improved their scoreson
the cardiovascular endurance test (step test).Results: 25/26 = 94%
of Students improved (increased)their core strength as measure by
sit up testing.
Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013
12/11/2012 - 100% (22 of 22) students showedimprovement in three
areas of the division fitness test.Result Type:Criterion
metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013
Assessment Method:Students will be examined visually, verbally
andkinesthetically in order to make sure they haveassimilated
concepts and can apply those toimprove sport specific
performance.Assessment Method Category:ExamSuccess Criterion:80% of
students will demonstrate mastery ofconcepts and application.
03/16/2015 - Over 90% of the students were able todemonstrate
improved efficacy in skills andperformance based on increased
conditioning.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2014 -
2015
01/31/2014 - Student performance in prescribedactivities related
to their sport did improve. Level ofimprovement was greatest in
those who were notengaged in off-season activities. However,
thesestudents were injured at a much higher rate.Result
Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2013 - 2014
06/06/2013 - Results: 93% (14 of 15) of studentsshowed
improvement in performance in strngth andconditioning as related to
the sport of basketball.Result Type:Criterion metReporting
Cycle:2012 - 2013
06/06/2013 - Results: 25/26 students demonstratedmastery of
concepts and application by scoring 75% orbetter on exam. Sport
specific exam was related tobaseball.Result Type:
03/23/2015 2:23 PM Generated by TracDat a product of Nuventive.
Page 22 of 177
-
Course Outcomes Means of Assessment & Success Criteria
/Tasks Results Action & Follow-Up
Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013
12/11/2012 - 90.9 % of students demonstrated masteryof concepts
and application in improving sport specificperformance.Result
Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013
SKY Dept - Kinesiology - SKY FITN 110 -Adult Conditioning-
Skills, concepts and techniques - Identify andbuild individual
skills related to conditioningprograms for adults applicable to
their specificgoals, evaluation of various techniques, use
ofequipment, scientific knowledge of conditioning,and improve /
maintain acceptable and healthybody composition, flexibility,
muscular strength,muscular endurance and flexibility. (Created By
SKY Dept - Kinesiology)
Course Outcome Status:Active
Assessment Method:A 55 question comprehensive exam related
tofunctional exercise, specific motions /movements, anatomy,
phisiology and safety. Theexam also includes a
self-assessment.Assessment Method Category:ExamSuccess
Criterion:70% of the students completing the course willget a 70%
or higher on the exam.
Related Documents:FITN written final exam 11 22 09.pdfFITN
written final exam 11 22 09.pdf
12/29/2012 - 32 of 34 (94%) students received a gradeof 70% or
higher on a comprehensive exam related tofunctional exercise,
specific motions / movements,anatomy, physiology and safety. The
exam alsoincluded self-assessment.Result Type:Criterion
metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013
02/08/2011 - 79% of students passed the final examrelated to
functional exercise, specific motions /movements, anatomy,
physiology and safety. The examalso included self-assessment
Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2010 - 2011Related
Documents:SLOAC FITN 110_Fall_ 2010 Sky.doc
Assessment Method:Skills Testing based on strength and
endurancecriteria.Assessment Method Category:Pre and post
testingSuccess Criterion:That 70% of the students enrolled will
showimprovement based on 8/12 skill tests.
12/29/2012 - 28 of 32 (88%) students demonstratedimprovement in
8 or more of the assessment tests basedon strength and
endurance.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013
02/08/2011 - 92% of students showed improvement in12 of 12
strength and endurance skills test areas.
03/23/2015 2:23 PM Generated by TracDat a product of Nuventive.
Page 23 of 177
https://sanmateo.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=PEhbI5t6HlMV
https://sanmateo.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=M5OjU6dAtX59
https://sanmateo.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=IV3WKYj7SIBg
-
Course Outcomes Means of Assessment & Success Criteria
/Tasks Results Action & Follow-Up
Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2010 - 2011Related
Documents:SLOAC FITN 110_Fall_ 2010 Sky.doc
Assessment Method:Fitness TestingAssessment Method Category:Pre
and post testingSuccess Criterion:70% of students will show
improvement on atleast 2 fitness test results at the post test.
12/29/2012 - 19 of 32 students (59%) showedimprovement in blood
pressure and cardiovascularefficiencyResult Type:Criterion not
metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013
03/22/2013 - Due to high absenteeismin this section, instructor
will test nextsemester's class and compare resultsbefore making
changes to coursecontent/SLO expectations.
Action Plan Category:Conduct Further Assessment
02/08/2011 - 100% of students showed improvement intheir post
test on at least half of the areas.
Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2010 - 2011Related
Documents:SLOAC FITN 110_Fall_ 2010 Sky.doc
SKY Dept - Kinesiology - SKY FITN 112 -Cross Training- Fitness
Improvement - Improve fitness levels,increase strength and
flexibility, and lose body fatthrough participation in a variety of
fitnessactivities. (Created By SKY Dept - Kinesiology)
Course Outcome Status:Inactive
Assessment Method:Pre- and post-fitness test
comparisonAssessment Method Category:Pre and post testingSuccess
Criterion:70% of students will show improvement on atleast 1
fitness test result at the post test.
05/15/2013 - 90% of students improved on at least 1fitness test
result at the post test. 76% of studentsimproved their muscular
endurance.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013
12/14/2012 - Out of 16 students who completed boththe pre and
post-fitness test (FITN 112 AX), 14 showedimprovement on at least
one test. Therefore 88%showed improvement on at least one test. On
muscular
03/23/2015 2:23 PM Generated by TracDat a product of Nuventive.
Page 24 of 177
https://sanmateo.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=IV3WKYj7SIBg
https://sanmateo.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=IV3WKYj7SIBg
-
Course Outcomes Means of Assessment & Success Criteria
/Tasks Results Action & Follow-Up
endurance alone, 88% of students showedimprovement.Result
Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013
12/15/2009 - 73% of students improved performance onat least 1
test.73% of students improved their body mass index.67% of students
improved their body composition.67% of students improved their 1
minute crunchperformance.Result Type:Criterion metReporting
Cycle:2009 - 2010
Assessment Method:Survey on personal fitnessAssessment Method
Category:SurveySuccess Criterion:70% of students will respond
positively toquestions about fitness levels at the end of
thesemester
Related Documents:Goal Tracking Form for classes.doc
05/20/2013 - 94% of students responded positively toquestions
about fitness level improvement at the end ofthe semester.Result
Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013
12/04/2012 - 94% (16 of 17 respondents in FITN BX)answered
positively to at least 70% of survey questionsabout perceived
fitness levels at the end of the semester.Result Type:Criterion
metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013
12/15/2009 - 95% of responses to questions aboutfitness levels
at the end of the semester, were positiveResult Type:Criterion
metReporting Cycle:2009 - 2010
Assessment Method:Daily participation points in
progressiveexercises to improve cardiovascular fitness,strength,
and flexibilityAssessment Method
Category:Presentation/PerformanceSuccess Criterion:70% of students
will complete 80% of daily
05/20/2013 - 76% of students completed at least 80% ofdaily
workoutsResult Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013
03/23/2015 2:23 PM Generated by TracDat a product of Nuventive.
Page 25 of 177
https://sanmateo.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=XHbfDMhnCYFP
-
Course Outcomes Means of Assessment & Success Criteria
/Tasks Results Action & Follow-Up
workouts
12/13/2012 - 19 of 20 students (FITN 112 BX), 95%, ofstudents
earned at least 80% of daily progressiveexercise points to improve
cardiovascular fitness,strength, and flexibility.Result
Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013
05/25/2011 - 88% of students completed 80% of dailyworkouts
designed to improve cardiovascular fitness,strength, and
flexibilityResult Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2010 - 2011
SKY Dept - Kinesiology - SKY FITN 112 -Cross Training- Fitness
self assessment - Be able to identify andassess their current
fitness level; alter or modifyspecific wellness or fitness
practices in order toimprove
bodycomposition/flexibility/cardiovascularfitness/muscular
endurance/muscular strengthrelated to performance (Created By SKY
Dept - Kinesiology)
Course Outcome Status:Active
Assessment Method:Weight loss/wellness quizAssessment Method
Category:ExamSuccess Criterion:70% of students will score 70% or
better onquestions pertaining to weight loss and
wellnessprinciples
03/16/2015 - Of the students who completed the courseslightly
less than 80% were able to successfullycomplete the quiz / exam
related to weight loss / fitness.Result Type:Criterion metReporting
Cycle:2014 - 2015
05/20/2013 - 75% of students scored 70% or better onquestions
pertaining to weight loss and wellnessprinciples.Result
Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013
10/26/2012 - 87% of students correctly answeredquestions
pertaining to weight loss and wellnessprinciple. Exam questions
were practical inquiriesabout individual food log results.Result
Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013
12/15/2009 - 80% of students scored 70% or better onquestions
pertaining to weight loss and wellnessprinciples.Result
Type:Criterion met
03/23/2015 2:23 PM Generated by TracDat a product of Nuventive.
Page 26 of 177
-
Course Outcomes Means of Assessment & Success Criteria
/Tasks Results Action & Follow-Up
Reporting Cycle:2009 - 2010
Assessment Method:Fitness and wellness principles quizAssessment
Method Category:ExamSuccess Criterion:70% of students will
correctly identify the role offitness in physical and mental
wellbeing; 70% ofstudents will score 70% or better on
multiplechoice quiz
05/17/2013 - 90% of students correctly identified therole of
fitness in physical and mental well-being; 76%scored 70% or better
on a multiple choice quiz.Result Type:Criterion metReporting
Cycle:2012 - 2013
12/10/2012 - 80% of students who completed thefitness and
wellness quiz scored 70% or betterResult Type:Criterion
metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013
05/20/2011 - 96% scored 70% or better on multiplechoice quiz on
fitness and wellness principles.Result Type:Criterion metReporting
Cycle:2010 - 2011
Assessment Method:Journal or small group discussion on
fitnessprinciplesAssessment Method Category:OtherSuccess
Criterion:70% of students will list and summarize fitnessdiscussion
points from in-class lecture/discussion
01/31/2014 - All students who completed the course(100%), we
able to list and summarize fitnessdiscussion points from in-class
lecture/discussion in ajournal exercise log.Result Type:Criterion
metReporting Cycle:2013 - 2014
05/08/2013 - 90% of students were able to list andsummarize
discussion points from in-class lecture anddiscussion in a small
group setting.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 -
2013
12/06/2012 - 95% of students completed a fitnessjournal which
included fitness/wellness discussionpoints as applied to weight
loss or fitness goals.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012
- 2013
03/23/2015 2:23 PM Generated by TracDat a product of Nuventive.
Page 27 of 177
-
Course Outcomes Means of Assessment & Success Criteria
/Tasks Results Action & Follow-Up
12/09/2010 - 74% of students listed and summarizedfitness
discussion points from in-classlecture/discussionsResult
Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2010 - 2011
SKY Dept - Kinesiology - SKY FITN 112 -Cross Training- Role of
fitness in wellbeing - Identify/explainthe role of physical fitness
and fitness principlesin both physical and mental wellbeing
(Created By SKY Dept - Kinesiology)
Course Outcome Status:Active
Assessment Method:Division Wellness QuizAssessment Method
Category:ExamSuccess Criterion:70% of students will score 70% or
better on amultiple choice quiz
Related Documents:Division ISLO test.doc
05/20/2013 - 75% of students scored 70% or better on amultiple
choice quiz pertaining to fitness and wellness.Result
Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013
12/04/2012 - 80% of students who completed theDivision Wellness
Quiz scored 70% or betterResult Type:Criterion metReporting
Cycle:2012 - 2013
05/17/2010 - 100% of students scored 70% or better onthe
division wellness exam.Result Type:Criterion metReporting
Cycle:2009 - 2010
Assessment Method:Journal- students will track fitness
activities andfeelings in a journal over the course of
thesemesterAssessment Method Category:OtherSuccess Criterion:70% of
students will exhibit positive mentalchanges brought about by
physical fitnessactivities
05/20/2013 - 83% of students exhibited positive mentalchanges
brought about by class fitness activities.Result Type:Criterion
metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013
12/11/2012 - 80% of students, while tracking dailyfitness
activities in a journal, expressed positive mentalchanges/feelings
of accomplishment/sense of fitnessand wellness improvement through
course activities.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 -
2013
12/14/2010 - 75% of students exhibited positive mentalchanges
brought about by physical fitness activities intheir journal
entries.
03/23/2015 2:23 PM Generated by TracDat a product of Nuventive.
Page 28 of 177
https://sanmateo.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=8RnYSkJuIiZA
-
Course Outcomes Means of Assessment & Success Criteria
/Tasks Results Action & Follow-Up
Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2010 - 2011
Assessment Method:Goal setting/goal attainment- students will
set 3realistic goals relating to fitness, set both an in-class and
out of class workout schedule, andfollow their plan to achieve
their goalsAssessment Method Category:OtherSuccess Criterion:70% of
students will reach at least one of theirsemester goals pertaining
to fitness/wellness
03/16/2015 - Over 90% of the students were able tomeet multiple
goals.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2014 - 2015
01/31/2014 - Multiple sections were taught utlizing avarity of
modes of conditioning (aerobic andanaerobic), means (running,
cycling, sprinting,resistance training, edurance training)
andmethodologies. In all cases, students at greayter than90% were
able to achieve pre-test goals.Result Type:Criterion metReporting
Cycle:2013 - 2014
05/20/2013 - 76% of students reached at least one oftheir
semester goals pertaining to fitness/wellness.Result Type:Criterion
metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013
12/06/2012 - 95% of students set 3 realistic goalsrelated to
fitness and a plan for attaining the goals.70% of students reached
at least one goal.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 -
2013
05/15/2009 - 85% of students achieved at least one oftheir
semester goals pertaining to fitness/wellness.Result Type:Criterion
metReporting Cycle:2009 - 2010
SKY Dept - Kinesiology - SKY FITN 116 -Body Conditioning-
Skills. Concepts and Techniques - Identify and
Assessment Method:A 55 question comprehensive exam related
tofunctional exercise, specific motions /
03/16/2015 - Of the students who completed the classmore than
70% attempted and completed the exam.Result Type:
03/23/2015 2:23 PM Generated by TracDat a product of Nuventive.
Page 29 of 177
-
Course Outcomes Means of Assessment & Success Criteria
/Tasks Results Action & Follow-Up
build individual skills related to conditioningprograms
applicable to their specific goals,evaluation of various
techniques, use ofequipment, scientific knowledge of
conditioning,and improve / maintain acceptable and healthybody
composition, flexibility, muscular strength,muscular endurance and
flexibility. (Created By SKY Dept - Kinesiology)
Course Outcome Status:Active
movements, anatomy, physiology and safety.The exam also includes
a self-assessment.Assessment Method Category:ExamSuccess
Criterion:70% of the students completing the course willget a 70%
or higher on the exam.
Related Documents:FITN written final exam 11 22 09.pdf
Criterion metReporting Cycle:2014 - 2015
05/24/2013 - 22 of 25 students earned a 70% or higheron a 55
question comprehensive exam related tofunctional exercise, specific
motions / movements,anatomy, physiology and safety. The exam
alsoincludes a self-assessment.Result Type:Criterion metReporting
Cycle:2012 - 2013
01/10/2013 - 30 of 38 (79%) students earned a 70% orhigher on a
55 question comprehensive exam related tofunctional exercise,
specific motions / movements,anatomy, physiology and safety. The
exam alsoincluded a self-assessment.Result Type:Criterion
metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013
Assessment Method:Skills testing based on strength and
endurancecriteriaAssessment Method Category:Pre and post
testingSuccess Criterion:That 70% of the students who complete
thecourse will show improvement in 8/12 skill tests.
03/16/2015 - Of the 12 skills test, the majority ofstudents, but
not 70%, showed improvement. Cardioscores were strongest but in
other areas related toagility, speed, balance, etc... gains were
not achieved.Possible need for more functional space.Result
Type:InconclusiveReporting Cycle:2014 - 2015Resources Needed to
Implement Action Plan:Need for more functional space in
currenttraining area.
01/31/2014 - Numerous sections were taught in thisclass with
some varied results. Result variation wasbased on student goals as
the class is more general innature and focused on student goals and
engagement.Over 80% of students completed the class with theseitems
being consistent through sections:
Cardiovascular equipment is quite popular and a focusMove away
from machine to functional trainingNeed for more open space for
speed and agilitytraining.
03/23/2015 2:23 PM Generated by TracDat a product of Nuventive.
Page 30 of 177
https://sanmateo.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=PEhbI5t6HlMV
-
Course Outcomes Means of Assessment & Success Criteria
/Tasks Results Action & Follow-Up
Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2013 - 2014
05/24/2013 - 28 of 28 students demonstratedimprovement in more
that 8 of the 12 skill area assessedrelated to muscular endurance
and stamina.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 -
2013
01/10/2013 - 33 of 38 (87%) students improved in 8 ormore
categories on pre and post testing (skills testingbased on strength
and endurance criteria).Result Type:Criterion metReporting
Cycle:2012 - 2013
06/13/2010 - 24 of 28 students (86%) showedimprovement in at
least 8 out of 12 skills tests on preand post testing (skills
testing based on strength andendurance criteria).Result
Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2009 - 2010Related
Documents:Fitness Class_List_Spring_116 _Summary only 2010-6 13
10.pdf
Assessment Method:Fitness Pre and Post TestsAssessment Method
Category:Pre and post testingSuccess Criterion:70% of students will
show improvement in 2areas of the division instituted fitness
test.
03/16/2015 - Of the students who completed the classslightly
more than 80% improved in at least two areas.Most consistent areas
noted were muscular enduranceand strength.Result Type:Criterion
metReporting Cycle:2014 - 2015
01/31/2014 - Over 80% of students showedimprovement in two or
more fitness areas. These wasdiversily spread amond all components
of fitness -muscular strength, muscular endurance,
cardiovascularefficiency, body composition and flexibility.
Factorssuch as balance and agility also improved.Result Type:
03/23/2015 2:23 PM Generated by TracDat a product of Nuventive.
Page 31 of 177
https://sanmateo.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=cKDRCdepX24U
https://sanmateo.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=cKDRCdepX24U
-
Course Outcomes Means of Assessment & Success Criteria
/Tasks Results Action & Follow-Up
Criterion metReporting Cycle:2013 - 2014
05/24/2013 - 21 of 25 students demonstrated improvedmuscular
endurance; 17 of 25 students demonstratedimproved flexibility; 16
of 25 students demonstratedimproved body composition; 10 of 25
studentsdemonstrated improved cardiovascular efficiency.Result
Type:InconclusiveReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013Resources Needed to
Implement Action Plan:70% threshold was met only related to
muscularendurance. Body composition and flexibilitywere slightly
below that. Body composition testis subject to human error and as
such it'spossible that total numbers have a margin oferror that
could put result over 70%.
01/10/2013 - 25 of 33 students (75%) improved inflexibility and
31 of 33 (94%) in muscular enduranceon the division-instituted
fitness test.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 -
2013
SKY Dept - Kinesiology - SKY FITN 166 -Golf Fitness- Fitness
improvement - Identify and assesscurrent fitness level as it
pertains to golf and alteror modify specific fitness practices in
order toimprove performance, increase strength,flexibility and
cardiovascular fitness (Created BySKY Dept - Kinesiology)
Course Outcome Status:Active
Assessment Method:Self assessment surveyAssessment Method
Category:SurveySuccess Criterion:70% of students will respond
positively to surveyon performance increases
03/16/2015 - 100% of students who completed the classwere able
to correctly assess their fitness level. Studentswere able to
improve strength through g