Top Banner

of 5

sklan1993

Jul 07, 2018

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • 8/19/2019 sklan1993

    1/8

    Production and Reproduction Responses by Dairy Cows

    Fed

    Varying

    Undegradable Protein Coated with Rumen Bypass Fat

    D. SKL N and M. TINSKY

    Faculty of griculture

    Hebrew University

    Rehovot

    76 100

    Israel

    INTRODUCTION

    Calcium soaps

    of

    fatty acids CSFA) fed to

    high producing cows in early lactation can

    enhance energy supply and, hence, milk and

    M TERI LS ND METHODS

    These experiments were designed to test the

    use

    of

    a product containing rumen bypass pro

    tein prepared by coating com gluten meal

     61 protein) with CSFA prepared from palm

    fatty distillate Ooublepro; Koffolk Ltd.,

    Petach Tikva, Israel) as previously described

     4). This product was free flowing and granu

    lar. The composition of the Doublepro was

     percentage

    of

    OM); 59.0 total fatty acids,

    .3 FFA, 22.7 CP, and 5.5 Ca. The VIP

    determined with nylon bags as described

    lat er constituted 95.6 of the CPo The fatty

    acId profile was 50.1 palmitic acid, 4.4

    stearic acid, 38.0 oleic acid, and 7.6

    linoleic acid. The CP was highly digestible and

    included 96.7 AA.

    FCM production without the detrimental ef

    fects of FFA on rumen fermentation 3, 4, 7,

    10 11). This increase in milk production may

    be accompanied by decreased OMI 6, 13) and

    by larger decreases in  W before peak lacta

    tion 17). As milk production increases, the

    demand for precursors of milk components,

    such as glucose and AA, also increases, and

    t h ~ s e precursors can become rate-limiting.

    WIth the objective

    of

    providing an enhanced

    supply of undegradable intake protein VIP),

    CSFA were used to coat proteins to reduce

    t h e ~ r degradation in the rumen 14), thus sup

    plymg rumen bypass fat and protein. This

    study describes the use of CSFA-coated pro

    tein to examine the effects of changes in UIP

    and degradable intake protein DIP) on

    production and reproduction by high producing

    dairy cows.

    Experiment

    The objective of Experiment 1 was to deter

    mine the effect

    of

    increasing VIP at constant

    CP by feeding Doublepro. Two dietary treat

    ments each were used with 53 multiparous

    216

    Received May 18. 1992.

    Accepted August 3 1992.

    ICorresponding author.

    1993

    J Dairy Sci 76:216-223

     BSTR CT

    Calcium soaps of fatty acids were

    used to coat proteins, thus reducing ru

    men degradability. This material was

    used to determine the effects

    of

    either

    i n ~ r e a s i n g

    undegradable intake protein

    wIth constant CP or varying degradable

    p ~ o t e ~ n with constant undegradable pro

    tem mtake. Increased undegradable in

    take protein and Ca soaps fed for 120

    DIM enhanced milk fat and FCM

    production during 140 and 305 DIM.

    Reproductive performance also was im

    proved. Feed efficiency and partial effi

    ciency

    of

    milk production were en

    ~ a n c e d Varying degradable protein

    mtake at constant undegradable protein

    intake using proteins coated with Ca

    soap resulted in decreased production

    when degradable protein intake was .4

    kg/d lower than NRC recommendations,

    but no differences were significant when

    intakes were close to or

    .5

    kg/d above

    NRC recommendations. Use

    of

    Ca soaps

    to coat proteins appears to be useful to

    optimize protein supply to dairy cows

    while increasing ration energy density.

      ey words: calcium soaps, protein,

    production, reproduction)

      ~ b r e v i t i o n

    key:

     SF

    A =Ca soaps of fatty

    aCIds DIP

    =

    degradable intake protein, TG

    =

    ~ g l y c e r i d e s

    VIP

    =

    undegradable intake pro

    tem.

    Production and Reproduction Responses by Dairy Cows

    Fed

    Varying

    Undegradable Protein Coated with Rumen Bypass Fat

    D. SKL N and M. TINSKY

    Faculty of griculture

    Hebrew University

    Rehovot

    76 100

    Israel

    INTRODUCTION

    Calcium soaps

    of

    fatty acids CSFA) fed to

    high producing cows in early lactation can

    enhance energy supply and, hence, milk and

    M TERI LS ND METHODS

    These experiments were designed to test the

    use

    of

    a product containing rumen bypass pro

    tein prepared by coating com gluten meal

     61 protein) with CSFA prepared from palm

    fatty distillate Ooublepro; Koffolk Ltd.,

    Petach Tikva, Israel) as previously described

     4). This product was free flowing and granu

    lar. The composition of the Doublepro was

     percentage

    of

    OM); 59.0 total fatty acids,

    .3 FFA, 22.7 CP, and 5.5 Ca. The VIP

    determined with nylon bags as described

    lat er constituted 95.6 of the CPo The fatty

    acId profile was 50.1 palmitic acid, 4.4

    stearic acid, 38.0 oleic acid, and 7.6

    linoleic acid. The CP was highly digestible and

    included 96.7 AA.

    FCM production without the detrimental ef

    fects of FFA on rumen fermentation 3, 4, 7,

    10 11). This increase in milk production may

    be accompanied by decreased OMI 6, 13) and

    by larger decreases in  W before peak lacta

    tion 17). As milk production increases, the

    demand for precursors of milk components,

    such as glucose and AA, also increases, and

    t h ~ s e precursors can become rate-limiting.

    WIth the objective

    of

    providing an enhanced

    supply of undegradable intake protein VIP),

    CSFA were used to coat proteins to reduce

    t h e ~ r degradation in the rumen 14), thus sup

    plymg rumen bypass fat and protein. This

    study describes the use of CSFA-coated pro

    tein to examine the effects of changes in UIP

    and degradable intake protein DIP) on

    production and reproduction by high producing

    dairy cows.

    Experiment

    The objective of Experiment 1 was to deter

    mine the effect

    of

    increasing VIP at constant

    CP by feeding Doublepro. Two dietary treat

    ments each were used with 53 multiparous

    216

    Received May 18. 1992.

    Accepted August 3 1992.

    ICorresponding author.

    1993

    J Dairy Sci 76:216-223

     BSTR CT

    Calcium soaps of fatty acids were

    used to coat proteins, thus reducing ru

    men degradability. This material was

    used to determine the effects

    of

    either

    i n ~ r e a s i n g

    undegradable intake protein

    wIth constant CP or varying degradable

    p ~ o t e ~ n with constant undegradable pro

    tem mtake. Increased undegradable in

    take protein and Ca soaps fed for 120

    DIM enhanced milk fat and FCM

    production during 140 and 305 DIM.

    Reproductive performance also was im

    proved. Feed efficiency and partial effi

    ciency

    of

    milk production were en

    ~ a n c e d Varying degradable protein

    mtake at constant undegradable protein

    intake using proteins coated with Ca

    soap resulted in decreased production

    when degradable protein intake was .4

    kg/d lower than NRC recommendations,

    but no differences were significant when

    intakes were close to or

    .5

    kg/d above

    NRC recommendations. Use

    of

    Ca soaps

    to coat proteins appears to be useful to

    optimize protein supply to dairy cows

    while increasing ration energy density.

      ey words: calcium soaps, protein,

    production, reproduction)

      ~ b r e v i t i o n

    key:

     SF

    A =Ca soaps of fatty

    aCIds DIP

    =

    degradable intake protein, TG

    =

    ~ g l y c e r i d e s

    VIP

    =

    undegradable intake pro

    tem.

  • 8/19/2019 sklan1993

    2/8

    BYPASS FAT AND PROTEIN FOR PRODUCTION

    217

    Israeli-Friesian cows per group. Cows were

    housed

    in

    group pens;

    all

    cows

    in

    the pen were

    in the trial. Cows were blocked according to

    parity, date

    of

    parturition, and previous lacta

    tion daily FCM production. Cows calved

    within a 45-d period. The dietary treatments

    were designed to contain equal amounts

    of

    CP,

    but VIP was higher (6.8 vs 6.0 of DM), and

    DIP was lower (10.7

    vs

    11.5 of OM),

    in

    the

    treatment group fed Doublepro. Dietary ingre

    dients were manipulated to provide equal

    amounts of ADF and NDF. Composition and

    analysis of diets are presented in Table 1. The

    experimental diet contained l.81 of Meal of

    NEdkg

    of DM compared with 1.72 for the

    control diet. All feeds were mixed, weighed,

    and

    fed

    twice daily from a mixing wagon.

    TABLE   Ingredient and chemical composition and anal

    ysis of diets in Experiment 1.

    Control Doublepro

    -

    ( of DM

    Composition

    Barley 15.5 7.9

    Corn grain, ground

    13.3 18.0

    Wheat bran

    2.5 4.9

    Commercial concentrate

    20.6 14.8

    CaC03   NaCI

    .7 .6

    Doublepro

    2

    4.0

    Alfalfa hay

    12.5 12.3

    Wheat silage 26.3 26.5

    Cottonseeds 8.6 11.0

    Analysis

    3

    NEL, Mcallkg

    of

    DM 1.72 1.81

    CPo

      17.5 17.5

    UIP,4

    6.0 6.8

    DIP,S

    11.5 10.7

    Fat,

    3.9 6.6

    Ca,

    .9

     

    P,

    .44 A3

    ADF, 20.4 2 A

    NDF 31.8 31.9

     Contained 1.83 Mealof NEL/kg of DM and 27.8

    CP from 15.1 wheat, 27.1 wheat middlings, 10.9

    soybean meal, 3A corn gluten meal, 14.6 cottonseed

    meal, 13.I rapeseed meal, 12.3 feather

    meal,

    2.1

    soapstock,

      l

      vitamin and mineral mix, and .3

    CaC03

    2Doublepro (Koffolk Ltd., Petach Tikva, Israel) con

    tained 59 fa tty acids , 2 .27 CP, and 5.5 Ca

    3Pararneters were determined by analysis; NEL was

    calcula ted using NRC (9) values .

    4Undegradable intake protein.

    sDegradable intake protein.

    Weighbacks were less than 5

    of

    feed offered,

    were determined daily for each group through

    out the experimental period, and were removed

    before the a.m. feeding to determine daily

    DM . Diets were fed from calving to 120 DIM,

    after which all cows were transferred to the

    control diet.

    Milk production was recorded for each cow

    every

    12

    to

    14

    d until 160   7 DIM and then

    monthly through 305 DIM. Same day samples

    were composited from a.m. and p.m. milkings

    for fat, protein, and lactose determinations by

    infrared analysis for each cow every 12

    to

    14

    d. Body condition was determined using a

    five-point scale (where 1 =thin and 5

    =

    fat) on

    d 3 following parturition and then at 12- to

    14-d intervals until 140 to 160 DIM. Cows

    were weighed on d 3 following parturition and

    at 50, 95, and 120 DIM. Cows were observed

    for signs of estrus for a 30-min period three

    times daily and were inseminated at first estrus

    after 60 DIM.

     xperiment

    In Experiment 2 the effects of VIP fed at

    constant percentages and DIP and CP at varied

    percentages

    of

    the diet were examined using

    Doublepro. Three dietary treatments were used

    with 93 cows per treatment. All cows calved

    within a 60-d period. Diets contained 15.2,

    16.3, and 17.5 CP and 7.1 VIP. All diets

    contained

    1.81

    of Meal

    NEdkg

    of DM and

    had equal amounts of ADF and NDF. The 15.2

    and 16.3 CP treatments contained Doublepro

    and the 17.5 CP diet contained CSFA

    (Adolac®; Koffolk, Ltd). Composition and

    analysis of diets are presented

    in

    Table

    2.

    Cows were blocked by parity and

    by

    previous

    daily lactation FCM production. Milk, fat, and

    protein contents were determined in milk for

    two

    lO-d

    periods after parturition. Cows then

    were adapted to the experimental rations for at

    least

    12

    d and compared for the period from 60

    to 1lO DIM. All feeds were mixed and fed

    twice daily from a mixing wagon. Orts were

    determined daily for each group throughout the

    experimental period and removed before the

    a.m. feeding to determine daily DM .

    Milk production was recorded electronically

    at each milking, and samples were composited

    from a.m. and p.m. milkings for determination

    of

    fat

    protein,

    and

    lactose contents by infrared

    analysis for each cow every

    12

    to 14

    d.

    Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 76,

    No.1,

    1993

    BYPASS FAT AND PROTEIN FOR PRODUCTION

    217

    Israeli-Friesian cows per group. Cows were

    housed

    in

    group pens;

    all

    cows

    in

    the pen were

    in the trial. Cows were blocked according to

    parity, date

    of

    parturition, and previous lacta

    tion daily FCM production. Cows calved

    within a 45-d period. The dietary treatments

    were designed to contain equal amounts

    of

    CP,

    but VIP was higher (6.8 vs 6.0 of DM), and

    DIP was lower (10.7

    vs

    11.5 of OM),

    in

    the

    treatment group fed Doublepro. Dietary ingre

    dients were manipulated to provide equal

    amounts of ADF and NDF. Composition and

    analysis of diets are presented in Table 1. The

    experimental diet contained l.81 of Meal of

    NEdkg

    of DM compared with 1.72 for the

    control diet. All feeds were mixed, weighed,

    and

    fed

    twice daily from a mixing wagon.

    TABLE   Ingredient and chemical composition and anal

    ysis of diets in Experiment 1.

    Control Doublepro

    -

    ( of DM

    Composition

    Barley 15.5 7.9

    Corn grain, ground

    13.3 18.0

    Wheat bran

    2.5 4.9

    Commercial concentrate

    20.6 14.8

    CaC03   NaCI

    .7 .6

    Doublepro

    2

    4.0

    Alfalfa hay

    12.5 12.3

    Wheat silage 26.3 26.5

    Cottonseeds 8.6 11.0

    Analysis

    3

    NEL, Mcallkg

    of

    DM 1.72 1.81

    CPo

      17.5 17.5

    UIP,4

    6.0 6.8

    DIP,S

    11.5 10.7

    Fat,

    3.9 6.6

    Ca,

    .9

     

    P,

    .44 A3

    ADF, 20.4 2 A

    NDF 31.8 31.9

     Contained 1.83 Mealof NEL/kg of DM and 27.8

    CP from 15.1 wheat, 27.1 wheat middlings, 10.9

    soybean meal, 3A corn gluten meal, 14.6 cottonseed

    meal, 13.I rapeseed meal, 12.3 feather

    meal,

    2.1

    soapstock,

      l

      vitamin and mineral mix, and .3

    CaC03

    2Doublepro (Koffolk Ltd., Petach Tikva, Israel) con

    tained 59 fa tty acids , 2 .27 CP, and 5.5 Ca

    3Pararneters were determined by analysis; NEL was

    calcula ted using NRC (9) values .

    4Undegradable intake protein.

    sDegradable intake protein.

    Weighbacks were less than 5

    of

    feed offered,

    were determined daily for each group through

    out the experimental period, and were removed

    before the a.m. feeding to determine daily

    DM . Diets were fed from calving to 120 DIM,

    after which all cows were transferred to the

    control diet.

    Milk production was recorded for each cow

    every

    12

    to

    14

    d until 160   7 DIM and then

    monthly through 305 DIM. Same day samples

    were composited from a.m. and p.m. milkings

    for fat, protein, and lactose determinations by

    infrared analysis for each cow every 12

    to

    14

    d. Body condition was determined using a

    five-point scale (where 1 =thin and 5

    =

    fat) on

    d 3 following parturition and then at 12- to

    14-d intervals until 140 to 160 DIM. Cows

    were weighed on d 3 following parturition and

    at 50, 95, and 120 DIM. Cows were observed

    for signs of estrus for a 30-min period three

    times daily and were inseminated at first estrus

    after 60 DIM.

     xperiment

    In Experiment 2 the effects of VIP fed at

    constant percentages and DIP and CP at varied

    percentages

    of

    the diet were examined using

    Doublepro. Three dietary treatments were used

    with 93 cows per treatment. All cows calved

    within a 60-d period. Diets contained 15.2,

    16.3, and 17.5 CP and 7.1 VIP. All diets

    contained

    1.81

    of Meal

    NEdkg

    of DM and

    had equal amounts of ADF and NDF. The 15.2

    and 16.3 CP treatments contained Doublepro

    and the 17.5 CP diet contained CSFA

    (Adolac®; Koffolk, Ltd). Composition and

    analysis of diets are presented

    in

    Table

    2.

    Cows were blocked by parity and

    by

    previous

    daily lactation FCM production. Milk, fat, and

    protein contents were determined in milk for

    two

    lO-d

    periods after parturition. Cows then

    were adapted to the experimental rations for at

    least

    12

    d and compared for the period from 60

    to 1lO DIM. All feeds were mixed and fed

    twice daily from a mixing wagon. Orts were

    determined daily for each group throughout the

    experimental period and removed before the

    a.m. feeding to determine daily DM .

    Milk production was recorded electronically

    at each milking, and samples were composited

    from a.m. and p.m. milkings for determination

    of

    fat

    protein,

    and

    lactose contents by infrared

    analysis for each cow every

    12

    to 14

    d.

    Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 76,

    No.1,

    1993

  • 8/19/2019 sklan1993

    3/8

    218

    SKLAN AND TINSKY

     ll xperiments

    The VIP content was determined in all

    feeds and in the total ration by 24-h suspension

    of

    5-g samples

    in

    dacron bags pore size

    40

    to

    50 p. in the rumen of a cow fed 20 kg/d of a

    65:35 concentrate:forage diet. Residues were

    washed for

    IS

    min with tap water, dried at

    60·C, and assayed for DM and N. No correc

    tion was made for microbial residues; thus UIP

    was defined as protein not degraded after 24 h

    in the dacron bags. Determination

    of

    DM, CP,

    ADF, NDF, Ca, and P were by standard

    methods  I) , and DIP was calculated as

    CP

    TABLE 2. Ingredient and chemical composition

    of

    diets in

    Experiment 2.

    15.2 16.3 17.5

    CP CP CP

      of DM)  

    C ;mposition

    Com

    grain, ground 9.7 10.2

    8.0

    Barley 19.6 18.7

    15.2

    Soybean meal

    I

    0

    3.1 2.0

    Commercial concentrate

    2

    14.2 16.1

    18.1

    Wheat bran

    5.9 5.5

    9.1

    CaC03

    1.8

    1.7 1.7

    Doublepro

    3

    4.4 4.2

    0

    Ca Soaps

    of

    fatty acids

    0 0 2.4

    Citrus pulp

    7.8

    4.4

    6.9

    Wheat silage

    13.3

    14.9

    13.4

    Com

    silage 18.4 17.5 18.7

    Alfalfa hay 4.9 3.7 4.5

    Analysis

    4

    NEL, McalJkg

    of DM

    1.81 1.81

    1.81

    CP,

    15.2

    16.3

    17.6

    VIP S  

    7.1

    7.1

    7.1

    D1P 6

     

    8.1

    9.2 10.5

    Fat. 5.0

    4.8 4.3

    Ca,

    .9 .9 .9

    P,

    .42

    .42

    .42

    ADF,

    17.3

    16.7 16.2

    NDF,

    31.1 32.3 32.4

    lContaining 45 CPo

    2Contained 1.83 Meal

    of

    NELlkg

    of

    DM and 49.1

    CP from 15.0 soybean meal, 9.9

    com

    gluten meal,

    18.4 wheat middlings, 15.0 cottonseed meal, 25.0

    rapeseed meal, 15.0 feather meal, .5 soapstock, and

    1.2 mineral and vitamin mix.

    3Doublepro Koffolk Ltd., Petach Tikva, Israel) con

    tained 59 fany acids; 22.7 CP, and 5.5 Ca.

    4Parameters were detennined by analysis; NEL was

    calcu lated using NRC 9) values.

    SVndegradable intake protein.

    6Degradable intake protein.

    Journal

    of

    Dairy Science Vol. 76, No. I 1993

    minus VIP. Total fatty acids were determined

    after acid hydrolysis

     IS).

    Rumen fluid was taken from 15 cows per

    treatment by stomach tube 30, 65, 86, and 105

    DIM in Exper iment 1 and

    70

    and 95 DIM in

    Experiment 2) 4 h after the a.m. feed into

    tubes containing HgCI2; the tubes were cooled

    immediately and stored at

    -20·C

    for

    VFA

    analysis by

    GLC

    conducted as previously

    described 15) and for NH3 determination 1).

    Blood plasma was sampled from the jugular

    vein of 15 cows in each treatment at 0700 h

     bout 2 h after feeding) on the day that rumen

    fluid was taken. Lipids were extracted, and

    triglycerides

     TG

    and

    FFA

    were determined

    as previously described 17). Concentrations

    of

    total protein were determined by the Biuret

    method

     I) ,

    and urea

     5)

    was also determined.

    Milk and fat outputs were util ized to calculate

    3.5 FCM using the formula: 3.5

    FCM =

    milk production

    x

     .432

     

    .163

    x

    fat ).

    Continuous variables were analyzed by the

    method

    of

    least squares ANOVA using the

    general linear models procedure of SAS  12).

    The model used was a general randomized

    model:

    Yijklmn =  

    TRi   DATj

      Lk   DI

      X

    m

      Eijklrnn,

    where

    Y = all dependent variables presented;

    p. =

    overall mean

    of

    the population;

    TRi = average effect of treatment;

    DATj = a covariance variable, average ef

    fect

    of

    date

    of

    observation;

    Lk =

    a covariance variable, average ef

    fect

    of

    lactation number;

    DI = a covariance variable, effect of

    DIM;

    X

    m

    = a covariance variable, effect

    of

    dependent variable in the previ

    ous lactation Experiment 1)

    or

    determined in two 10-d periods

    before adaptation Experiment 2);

    and

    Ejjklnm = random residual assuming normal

    independent distribution.

    Frequency data were examined by chi

    square analysis and with the

    CATMOD

    proce-

    218

    SKLAN AND TINSKY

     ll xperiments

    The VIP content was determined in all

    feeds and in the total ration by 24-h suspension

    of

    5-g samples

    in

    dacron bags pore size

    40

    to

    50 p. in the rumen of a cow fed 20 kg/d of a

    65:35 concentrate:forage diet. Residues were

    washed for

    IS

    min with tap water, dried at

    60·C, and assayed for DM and N. No correc

    tion was made for microbial residues; thus UIP

    was defined as protein not degraded after 24 h

    in the dacron bags. Determination

    of

    DM, CP,

    ADF, NDF, Ca, and P were by standard

    methods  I) , and DIP was calculated as

    CP

    TABLE 2. Ingredient and chemical composition

    of

    diets in

    Experiment 2.

    15.2 16.3 17.5

    CP CP CP

      of DM)  

    C ;mposition

    Com

    grain, ground 9.7 10.2

    8.0

    Barley 19.6 18.7

    15.2

    Soybean meal

    I

    0

    3.1 2.0

    Commercial concentrate

    2

    14.2 16.1

    18.1

    Wheat bran

    5.9 5.5

    9.1

    CaC03

    1.8

    1.7 1.7

    Doublepro

    3

    4.4 4.2

    0

    Ca Soaps

    of

    fatty acids

    0 0 2.4

    Citrus pulp

    7.8

    4.4

    6.9

    Wheat silage

    13.3

    14.9

    13.4

    Com

    silage 18.4 17.5 18.7

    Alfalfa hay 4.9 3.7 4.5

    Analysis

    4

    NEL, McalJkg

    of DM

    1.81 1.81

    1.81

    CP,

    15.2

    16.3

    17.6

    VIP S  

    7.1

    7.1

    7.1

    D1P 6

     

    8.1

    9.2 10.5

    Fat. 5.0

    4.8 4.3

    Ca,

    .9 .9 .9

    P,

    .42

    .42

    .42

    ADF,

    17.3

    16.7 16.2

    NDF,

    31.1 32.3 32.4

    lContaining 45 CPo

    2Contained 1.83 Meal

    of

    NELlkg

    of

    DM and 49.1

    CP from 15.0 soybean meal, 9.9

    com

    gluten meal,

    18.4 wheat middlings, 15.0 cottonseed meal, 25.0

    rapeseed meal, 15.0 feather meal, .5 soapstock, and

    1.2 mineral and vitamin mix.

    3Doublepro Koffolk Ltd., Petach Tikva, Israel) con

    tained 59 fany acids; 22.7 CP, and 5.5 Ca.

    4Parameters were detennined by analysis; NEL was

    calcu lated using NRC 9) values.

    SVndegradable intake protein.

    6Degradable intake protein.

    Journal

    of

    Dairy Science Vol. 76, No. I 1993

    minus VIP. Total fatty acids were determined

    after acid hydrolysis

     IS).

    Rumen fluid was taken from 15 cows per

    treatment by stomach tube 30, 65, 86, and 105

    DIM in Exper iment 1 and

    70

    and 95 DIM in

    Experiment 2) 4 h after the a.m. feed into

    tubes containing HgCI2; the tubes were cooled

    immediately and stored at

    -20·C

    for

    VFA

    analysis by

    GLC

    conducted as previously

    described 15) and for NH3 determination 1).

    Blood plasma was sampled from the jugular

    vein of 15 cows in each treatment at 0700 h

     bout 2 h after feeding) on the day that rumen

    fluid was taken. Lipids were extracted, and

    triglycerides

     TG

    and

    FFA

    were determined

    as previously described 17). Concentrations

    of

    total protein were determined by the Biuret

    method

     I) ,

    and urea

     5)

    was also determined.

    Milk and fat outputs were util ized to calculate

    3.5 FCM using the formula: 3.5

    FCM =

    milk production

    x

     .432

     

    .163

    x

    fat ).

    Continuous variables were analyzed by the

    method

    of

    least squares ANOVA using the

    general linear models procedure of SAS  12).

    The model used was a general randomized

    model:

    Yijklmn =  

    TRi   DATj

      Lk   DI

      X

    m

      Eijklrnn,

    where

    Y = all dependent variables presented;

    p. =

    overall mean

    of

    the population;

    TRi = average effect of treatment;

    DATj = a covariance variable, average ef

    fect

    of

    date

    of

    observation;

    Lk =

    a covariance variable, average ef

    fect

    of

    lactation number;

    DI = a covariance variable, effect of

    DIM;

    X

    m

    = a covariance variable, effect

    of

    dependent variable in the previ

    ous lactation Experiment 1)

    or

    determined in two 10-d periods

    before adaptation Experiment 2);

    and

    Ejjklnm = random residual assuming normal

    independent distribution.

    Frequency data were examined by chi

    square analysis and with the

    CATMOD

    proce-

  • 8/19/2019 sklan1993

    4/8

    BYPASS FAT AND PROTEIN FOR PRODUCTION

    219

    3 .5

    2.0 L L _ .L _

     

    __ __ .J

     1 0

    20 50 80

    11 0

    140

    15 0 Figure 2. Body condition scores

    of

    cows fed

    Doublepro  e and controls (0); bars are standard errors.

    12 0

     a ys   m lk

    60 900

    15   - -----  .L _

    _

    ____ J

    o

    30

    25

    u

     

    20

    Figure I. Dry matter intake by cows fed Doublepro (e)

    and controls (0) . Values are per group.

    dure of SAS (12). Significance was at

     

    <

    .05

    unless otherwise stated.

    R SULTS

     xperiment

    Daily feed intake

    in

    the group receivIng

    Doublepro was less than in controls, particu

    larly during the first 30 DIM when DMI was 2

    to 3 kg/d less (Figure 1 . The difference in

    group DMI consumption decreased with DIM;

    over the 120-d experimental period. the cu

    mulative difference in DMI was 106

    kg

    per

    cow. Body condition scores tended to be lower

    in cows fed Doublepro in the first 30 DIM  

    < .13; Figure 2), and BW changes at 50, 95,

    and 120 DIM compared with BW at calving

    were -8 , 2 and

    21

    kg in controls and -20.1,

    10 and 26

    kg

    in cows fed Doublepro, respec

    tively; treatment effects were not significant.

    Production

    of

    milk, fat and FCM (Figure 3

    Table 3 were enhanced in cows fed Doublepro

    over the 120-d experimental period and for an

    additional 20 d after all cows were transferred

    to control rations. Milk protein percentage

    decreased, but milk protein production was not

    changed. Transfer

    of

    cows to control rations

    after 120 DIM caused a gradual convergence

    of

    production

    of

    cows fed Doublepro and con

    trols. Dver 305 d

    of

    lactation, the production

    of milk, fat, protein, and FCM increased in

    cows fed Doublepro   .05, Table 3).

    Diets had no effect on rumen VFA (Table

    4), although NH

    3

    concentrations were higher

    in the control cows. Plasma urea also was

    higher in control cows, but total plasma pro

    tein was not changed (Table 4). Plasma TG

    were higher

    in

    the cows fed Doublepro, but

    FFA concentrations did not differ (Table 4).

    Several measures

    of

    reproductive perfor

    mance were enhanced in cows

    fed

    Doublepro.

    The conception rate at first AI improved, and

    the percentage of cows pregnant at 90 d in-

    creased (Table 5 . No differences, however,

    were present by 150 DIM. Cows fed

    Doublepro had fewer days open, days between

    first

    AI

    and conception, and services per con

    ception.

    Calculation of energy balances using group

    feed intake (Table 6 indicated lower net

    energy balance

    in

    cows fed Doublepro. Both

    feed conversion to milk and the partial effi

    ciency

    of

    milk production tended

    to

    be higher

    TABLE 3. Production data for 120 and 305 d

    of

    lactation,

    Experiment

    1.

    Control Doublepro

    1

    SE

    Milk

    o to 120 DIM, kgld 41.5

    42.5

    a

    .2

    o

    to 305 DIM, kg

    10.188 1O.679

    a

    184

    Fat

    o to 120 DIM. kgld

    1.31

    1.39

    a

    .03

    o

    to 305 DIM, kg 315.1 335.8

    a

    6.4

    Protein

    o to 120 DIM. kgld I.I95 1.198 .012

    o to 305 DIM,

    kg

    298.8 307.4

    a

    4.7

    3.5 FCM

    o

    to 120 DIM. kgld 39.1 40.9

    a

    .2

    o

    to 305 DIM. kg 9537

    1O 086

    a

    174

    aDiffers from control

     

    .05).

    lKoffolk Ltd. (Petach Tikva. Israel).

    Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 76. No.

    1

    1993

    BYPASS FAT AND PROTEIN FOR PRODUCTION

    219

    3 .5

    2.0 L L _ .L _

     

    __ __ .J

     1 0

    20 50 80

    11 0

    140

    15 0 Figure 2. Body condition scores

    of

    cows fed

    Doublepro  e and controls (0); bars are standard errors.

    12 0

     a ys   m lk

    60 900

    15   - -----  .L _

    _

    ____ J

    o

    30

    25

    u

     

    20

    Figure I. Dry matter intake by cows fed Doublepro (e)

    and controls (0) . Values are per group.

    dure of SAS (12). Significance was at

     

    <

    .05

    unless otherwise stated.

    R SULTS

     xperiment

    Daily feed intake

    in

    the group receivIng

    Doublepro was less than in controls, particu

    larly during the first 30 DIM when DMI was 2

    to 3 kg/d less (Figure 1 . The difference in

    group DMI consumption decreased with DIM;

    over the 120-d experimental period. the cu

    mulative difference in DMI was 106

    kg

    per

    cow. Body condition scores tended to be lower

    in cows fed Doublepro in the first 30 DIM  

    < .13; Figure 2), and BW changes at 50, 95,

    and 120 DIM compared with BW at calving

    were -8 , 2 and

    21

    kg in controls and -20.1,

    10 and 26

    kg

    in cows fed Doublepro, respec

    tively; treatment effects were not significant.

    Production

    of

    milk, fat and FCM (Figure 3

    Table 3 were enhanced in cows fed Doublepro

    over the 120-d experimental period and for an

    additional 20 d after all cows were transferred

    to control rations. Milk protein percentage

    decreased, but milk protein production was not

    changed. Transfer

    of

    cows to control rations

    after 120 DIM caused a gradual convergence

    of

    production

    of

    cows fed Doublepro and con

    trols. Dver 305 d

    of

    lactation, the production

    of milk, fat, protein, and FCM increased in

    cows fed Doublepro   .05, Table 3).

    Diets had no effect on rumen VFA (Table

    4), although NH

    3

    concentrations were higher

    in the control cows. Plasma urea also was

    higher in control cows, but total plasma pro

    tein was not changed (Table 4). Plasma TG

    were higher

    in

    the cows fed Doublepro, but

    FFA concentrations did not differ (Table 4).

    Several measures

    of

    reproductive perfor

    mance were enhanced in cows

    fed

    Doublepro.

    The conception rate at first AI improved, and

    the percentage of cows pregnant at 90 d in-

    creased (Table 5 . No differences, however,

    were present by 150 DIM. Cows fed

    Doublepro had fewer days open, days between

    first

    AI

    and conception, and services per con

    ception.

    Calculation of energy balances using group

    feed intake (Table 6 indicated lower net

    energy balance

    in

    cows fed Doublepro. Both

    feed conversion to milk and the partial effi

    ciency

    of

    milk production tended

    to

    be higher

    TABLE 3. Production data for 120 and 305 d

    of

    lactation,

    Experiment

    1.

    Control Doublepro

    1

    SE

    Milk

    o to 120 DIM, kgld 41.5

    42.5

    a

    .2

    o

    to 305 DIM, kg

    10.188 1O.679

    a

    184

    Fat

    o to 120 DIM. kgld

    1.31

    1.39

    a

    .03

    o

    to 305 DIM, kg 315.1 335.8

    a

    6.4

    Protein

    o to 120 DIM. kgld I.I95 1.198 .012

    o to 305 DIM,

    kg

    298.8 307.4

    a

    4.7

    3.5 FCM

    o

    to 120 DIM. kgld 39.1 40.9

    a

    .2

    o

    to 305 DIM. kg 9537

    1O 086

    a

    174

    aDiffers from control

     

    .05).

    lKoffolk Ltd. (Petach Tikva. Israel).

    Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 76. No.

    1

    1993

  • 8/19/2019 sklan1993

    5/8

    220 SKLAN AND TINSKY

    TABLE 4. The VFA and

    NH 3

    concentrations

    in

    rumen

    fluid and concentrations

    of

    some metabolites in plasma of

    cows fed Doublepro

    l

    and controls, Experiment I.

    Control

    Doublepro SE

    in cows fed Ooublepro. The enhancement in

    partial efficiency

    of

    milk production in cows

    fed Ooublepro was more pronounced after

    peak lactation.

    Rumen fluid

    Acetic acid (Al, molJ

    100 mol

    59.2 59.5 .4

    Propionic acid (Pl,

    m o lJ lOO m o l 25.4 25.4 .4

    Butyric acid (B), molJ

    100 mol 12.5 12.6

    .3

    (A   B)/P

    2.85

    2.85 .1

    NH3' mgldl

    25.5

    20.1 1.1

    Plasma

    Urea, mgldl

    20.7

    16.7 .7

    Protein, gldl

    7.76

    7.88 .12

    FFA,  lM 44.4 49.8

    2.4

    TG,2 mgldl

    27.0

    31.6'

    .2

    'Differs from control

     P

    < .05).

    IKoffolk Ltd. (Petach Tikva. Israel).

    2Triglycerides.

     xperiment

    Group mean OMI over the experimental

    period for cows receiving the 15.2 CP diet

    was 21.8 kg/d compared with 23.4 and 23.6

    kg/d in the 16.3 and 17.5 CP groups, respec

    tively. Production

    of

    milk and fat, fat percent

    age, and, hence, FCM production (Table 7

    were lower in cows fed the 15.2 CP ration.

    Milk protein production decreased when the

    15.2 CP diet was fed compared with the

    other diets, but percentage of protein did not

    change compared with the 17.5 CP treat

    ment.

    No

    differences were observed

    in

    milk or

    50

    4 J

    r

    A

    45

    40

    3.5

    ;f

    T

      1

    3'5

    1

    . . L

    ....

     

    c'

    1 \

    1 -

      3

    i

    30

     

    1

    :2

    l

    2'5

    2.5

    20

    1

    1 5

    2. 0

    0

    50

    100

    15 0

    20 0

    25C 30 0

    0

    5C

    10 0 15C

    200 250

    c

    I

    30 0

    Days

    n rrd ..

    D

    4 0

    B

    3.5

    .c

     1]

    u.

    3.0

    '58

    45

    48

    D

    0.

    35

     

    30

    U

    U

    25

    20

     

      ~ \ >

    Y.

    = -

    T

    1

    T

    1

    2.5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

    30 0

    5

    00

    5000

    0

    15

    ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

    o00

    5000

    50000

    Figure 3. Milk production (A), milk fat percentage (B), milk protein percentage (C), and 3.5 FCM production (D)

    in Doublepro  e and control cows (0). Bars are standard errors and are shown when they do not fall within the symbols.

    The vertical line indicates the transfer

    of

    cows to the control ration.

    Journal

    of

    Dairy Science Vol. 76, No. I, 1993

    220 SKLAN AND TINSKY

    TABLE 4. The VFA and

    NH 3

    concentrations

    in

    rumen

    fluid and concentrations

    of

    some metabolites in plasma of

    cows fed Doublepro

    l

    and controls, Experiment I.

    Control

    Doublepro SE

    in cows fed Ooublepro. The enhancement in

    partial efficiency

    of

    milk production in cows

    fed Ooublepro was more pronounced after

    peak lactation.

    Rumen fluid

    Acetic acid (Al, molJ

    100 mol

    59.2 59.5 .4

    Propionic acid (Pl,

    m o lJ lOO m o l 25.4 25.4 .4

    Butyric acid (B), molJ

    100 mol 12.5 12.6

    .3

    (A   B)/P

    2.85

    2.85 .1

    NH3' mgldl

    25.5

    20.1 1.1

    Plasma

    Urea, mgldl

    20.7

    16.7 .7

    Protein, gldl

    7.76

    7.88 .12

    FFA,  lM 44.4 49.8

    2.4

    TG,2 mgldl

    27.0

    31.6'

    .2

    'Differs from control

     P

    < .05).

    IKoffolk Ltd. (Petach Tikva. Israel).

    2Triglycerides.

     xperiment

    Group mean OMI over the experimental

    period for cows receiving the 15.2 CP diet

    was 21.8 kg/d compared with 23.4 and 23.6

    kg/d in the 16.3 and 17.5 CP groups, respec

    tively. Production

    of

    milk and fat, fat percent

    age, and, hence, FCM production (Table 7

    were lower in cows fed the 15.2 CP ration.

    Milk protein production decreased when the

    15.2 CP diet was fed compared with the

    other diets, but percentage of protein did not

    change compared with the 17.5 CP treat

    ment.

    No

    differences were observed

    in

    milk or

    50

    4 J

    r

    A

    45

    40

    3.5

    ;f

    T

      1

    3'5

    1

    . . L

    ....

     

    c'

    1 \

    1 -

      3

    i

    30

     

    1

    :2

    l

    2'5

    2.5

    20

    1

    1 5

    2. 0

    0

    50

    100

    15 0

    20 0

    25C 30 0

    0

    5C

    10 0 15C

    200 250

    c

    I

    30 0

    Days

    n rrd ..

    D

    4 0

    B

    3.5

    .c

     1]

    u.

    3.0

    '58

    45

    48

    D

    0.

    35

     

    30

    U

    U

    25

    20

     

      ~ \ >

    Y.

    = -

    T

    1

    T

    1

    2.5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

    30 0

    5

    00

    5000

    0

    15

    ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

    o00

    5000

    50000

    Figure 3. Milk production (A), milk fat percentage (B), milk protein percentage (C), and 3.5 FCM production (D)

    in Doublepro  e and control cows (0). Bars are standard errors and are shown when they do not fall within the symbols.

    The vertical line indicates the transfer

    of

    cows to the control ration.

    Journal

    of

    Dairy Science Vol. 76, No. I, 1993

  • 8/19/2019 sklan1993

    6/8

    BYPASS FAT

    AND

    PROTEIN FOR PRODUCfION

    221

    TABLE

    5.

    The effect

    of

    feeding Doublepro on reproduc

    tive performance, Experiment

    1.

    changed. Plasma TG and FFA were not

    af-

    fected by the different treatments (Table 8).

    Control Doublepro

    l

    SE

    Differs from control  

    <

    .09).

    bDiffers from control

      <

    .05).

    I

    Koffolk Ltd. (Petach Tikva, Israel).

    fat production between cows fed 16.3 or

    17.5 CP; milk protein percentage increased

    in cows fed 16.3 CP.

    Rumen VFA composition was similar

    among the three treatments, except that

    butyrate was lower with the 17.5 diet, but

    NH3

    concentrations were lower in cows fed

    15.2 CP and increased with increasing CP

    (Table 8 . Plasma urea was lower in cows fed

    15.2 CP than in cows fed either 16.3 or

    17.5 CP, but total plasma protein was not

    53

    20.5

     IS USSION

    This study indicated that a rumen bypass

    fatty acid and protein product prepared by

    coating protein with CSFA can be utilized to

    improve production and reproduction in high

    producing dairy cows. This product was used

    in one situation to examine the effect

    of

    in

    creasing UIP above NRC (9) recommenda

    tions. This ration also had a higher energy

    density because of the CSFA, which increased

    energy intake. Production of milk and milk fat

    was enhanced, and increasing the UIP:CP with

    Doublepro resulted in lower rumen

    NH3

    and

    plasma urea concentrations. Plasma TG were

    higher when Doublepro was fed, which was

    expected because

    of

    enhanced uptake

    of

    die

    tary fatty acids.

    In

    previous reports (16, 17)

    when CSFA were fed, body reserves were

    apparently utilized more in early lactation,

    which contributed in part to the enhanced milk

    production. However, DMI decreased in our

    study and in previous studies (13, 17); al

    though total energy intake was still enhanced,

    energy intake and BW changes do not com

    pletely account for the increased production.

    Energy balance calculations indicated that the

    partial efficiency of milk synthesis tended to

    improve

    by

    use

    of

    Doublepro but was most

    pronounced after peak lactation. A possible

     I

    I.7

    3.2

    3.8

    53

    70.9

    8.6

    1.43

    1O.6

    b

    68.5

    92.7

    73

    84

    b

    58.5

    16.0

    1.68

    90.6

    75

    96

    Number of cows

    Conception rate,  

    First

    AI

    Second AI

    AI per conception

    Cows pregnant at 90

    d

    52.8

    Cows pregnant at 150

    d

    Days to first

    AI

    Days open

    Days to conception-

    days open

    TABLE

    6.

    Energy data during different periods

    of

    DIM for cows

    fed

    Doublepro and control, Experiment 1.

    o to 50 d

    50 to 95 d

    95 to 120 d

    Control Doublepro Control

    Doublepro

    Control

    Doublepro

    NEL Intake, Mcalld

    43.17 43.08 46.78 47.78

    46.96 48.51

    BW Change, kgld

      .16

      .40

    .04

    .22

    .46 .57

    NEL Maintenance,l Mcalld 9.89 9.72 10.02 10.13

    10.28 10.35

    NEL of weight change, Mcalld

    l

      .79

    -1.97

    .23

    1.12

    2.36 2.92

    NEL

    Milk 2

    Mcalld

    27.83

    28.98 27.56 28.75

    25.55 27.04

    NEL Balance,3

    McaIJd

    5.46 4.37

    9.21

    8.91

    11.13 11.22

    Feed efficiency4 .642 .673 .588 .602 .544 .557

    Milk effici

    ency

    5

    .804 .812 .745 .779

    .736 .759

    IFrom NRC (9).

    2Calculated from Tyrrell and Reid (19).

    3Net

    energy (NE) intake - (NE maintenance

     

    milk energy secretion).

    4NE in milkINE intake.

    5NE

    in milk/[NE intake - (NE in weight gain or loss

     

    NE maintenance)].

    Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 76, No.1 1993

    BYPASS FAT

    AND

    PROTEIN FOR PRODUCfION

    221

    TABLE

    5.

    The effect

    of

    feeding Doublepro on reproduc

    tive performance, Experiment

    1.

    changed. Plasma TG and FFA were not

    af-

    fected by the different treatments (Table 8).

    Control Doublepro

    l

    SE

    Differs from control  

    <

    .09).

    bDiffers from control

      <

    .05).

    I

    Koffolk Ltd. (Petach Tikva, Israel).

    fat production between cows fed 16.3 or

    17.5 CP; milk protein percentage increased

    in cows fed 16.3 CP.

    Rumen VFA composition was similar

    among the three treatments, except that

    butyrate was lower with the 17.5 diet, but

    NH3

    concentrations were lower in cows fed

    15.2 CP and increased with increasing CP

    (Table 8 . Plasma urea was lower in cows fed

    15.2 CP than in cows fed either 16.3 or

    17.5 CP, but total plasma protein was not

    53

    20.5

     IS USSION

    This study indicated that a rumen bypass

    fatty acid and protein product prepared by

    coating protein with CSFA can be utilized to

    improve production and reproduction in high

    producing dairy cows. This product was used

    in one situation to examine the effect

    of

    in

    creasing UIP above NRC (9) recommenda

    tions. This ration also had a higher energy

    density because of the CSFA, which increased

    energy intake. Production of milk and milk fat

    was enhanced, and increasing the UIP:CP with

    Doublepro resulted in lower rumen

    NH3

    and

    plasma urea concentrations. Plasma TG were

    higher when Doublepro was fed, which was

    expected because

    of

    enhanced uptake

    of

    die

    tary fatty acids.

    In

    previous reports (16, 17)

    when CSFA were fed, body reserves were

    apparently utilized more in early lactation,

    which contributed in part to the enhanced milk

    production. However, DMI decreased in our

    study and in previous studies (13, 17); al

    though total energy intake was still enhanced,

    energy intake and BW changes do not com

    pletely account for the increased production.

    Energy balance calculations indicated that the

    partial efficiency of milk synthesis tended to

    improve

    by

    use

    of

    Doublepro but was most

    pronounced after peak lactation. A possible

     I

    I.7

    3.2

    3.8

    53

    70.9

    8.6

    1.43

    1O.6

    b

    68.5

    92.7

    73

    84

    b

    58.5

    16.0

    1.68

    90.6

    75

    96

    Number of cows

    Conception rate,  

    First

    AI

    Second AI

    AI per conception

    Cows pregnant at 90

    d

    52.8

    Cows pregnant at 150

    d

    Days to first

    AI

    Days open

    Days to conception-

    days open

    TABLE

    6.

    Energy data during different periods

    of

    DIM for cows

    fed

    Doublepro and control, Experiment 1.

    o to 50 d

    50 to 95 d

    95 to 120 d

    Control Doublepro Control

    Doublepro

    Control

    Doublepro

    NEL Intake, Mcalld

    43.17 43.08 46.78 47.78

    46.96 48.51

    BW Change, kgld

      .16

      .40

    .04

    .22

    .46 .57

    NEL Maintenance,l Mcalld 9.89 9.72 10.02 10.13

    10.28 10.35

    NEL of weight change, Mcalld

    l

      .79

    -1.97

    .23

    1.12

    2.36 2.92

    NEL

    Milk 2

    Mcalld

    27.83

    28.98 27.56 28.75

    25.55 27.04

    NEL Balance,3

    McaIJd

    5.46 4.37

    9.21

    8.91

    11.13 11.22

    Feed efficiency4 .642 .673 .588 .602 .544 .557

    Milk effici

    ency

    5

    .804 .812 .745 .779

    .736 .759

    IFrom NRC (9).

    2Calculated from Tyrrell and Reid (19).

    3Net

    energy (NE) intake - (NE maintenance

     

    milk energy secretion).

    4NE in milkINE intake.

    5NE

    in milk/[NE intake - (NE in weight gain or loss

     

    NE maintenance)].

    Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 76, No.1 1993

  • 8/19/2019 sklan1993

    7/8

    222 SKLAN AND TINSKY

    TABLE 7 Production by cows fed diets similar in undegradable protein but differing in CP, Experiment 2

    Dietary   P

    15.2 16.3 17.5 SE

    Milk, kgld

    36.7

    b

    37.3

    8

    37.3

    8

    .2

    Fat,  

    3 1

    b

    3.06 3.05

    8

    .03

    Fat, kgld

    l.lQb

    1.14

    8

    1.14

    8

      1

    Protein,  

    2.85

    b

    2.88

    8

    2.86

    b

    .01

    Protein. kgld

    1.042

    b

    1.075

    8

    1.067

    8

      6

    3.5 FCM, kgld

    33.8

    b

    34.7

    8

    34.7

    8

     2

    l.hMeans in rows with different superscripts differ

      <

    .05).

    source of enhanced energy supply before and

    at peak lactation

    in

    cows

    fed

    Doublepro was

    indicated

    by

    the tendency of the cows to utilize

    more body reserves for milk synthesis. The

    enhanced partial efficiency of milk production

    may

    be explained by more efficient milk syn

    thesis from long-chain fatty acid precursors

    compared with VFA, as suggested

    by

    Kronfeld

    (8) and Brumby et al (2). Furthermore, synthe

    sis of

    more milk requires higher

    AA

    supply or

    higher quality AA supply to the mammary

    gland, which may have been provided by the

    higher VIP in the present study. However,

    because protein sources varied slightly in the

    different treatments, AA supply to the mam

    mary gland could have differed. Thus, the

    combination of bypass fat and increased AA

    supply to the intestine may provide

    an

    efficient

    combination for improved production in the

    first trimester of lactation.

    Reproductive performance was improved by

    Doublepro, particularly at the first

    AI

    when

    body condition was similar in the two treat

    ments. In a previous report (17), reproductive

    response to CSFA was mainly at the second

    AI However, in that study (17), body condi

    tion scores

    of

    cows fed CSFA reached a mini

    mum and began to increase later in lactation

    than did controls and later than did cows ob-

    served in our study. This difference may indi

    cate that, in that experiment (17), the supply of

    VIP

    in

    early lactation was limiting.

    In

    another situation (Experiment 2),

    Doublepro was used to examine the effect of

    constant dietary VIP but varied CP and DIP.

    Consumption of VIP was at least 1.54 kg/d,

    which is more than adequate based on NRC

    (9) recommendations; DIP were 1.7, 2.1, and

    2.5 kg/d. The NRC (9) recommendation for

    DIP is 2.0 kg at the production tested. Both

    TABLE

    8

    Rumen VFA and NH3 concentrations in rumen fluid and concentrations

    of

    some metabolites in plasma of

    cows fed diets s imilar in undegradable intake protein but differing in CP level, Experiment 2.

    Dietary   P

    15.2

    16.3

    17.5 SE

    Rumen fluid

    Acet ic acid (A), mol/1oo mol

    60.3 59.9

    62.4

    .8

    Propionic acid (P), mol/1oo mol

    24.0 24.3

    23.1 .7

    Butyric acid (B), mol/1oo mol

    13.1

    13.3

    8

    11.2

    b

    .5

    (A

     

    B)/P

    3 1

    3.0 3.2

     1

    NH3, mgldl 15 6<

    18.0

    b

    21.2

    8

    .9

    Plasma

    Urea, mgldl

    14.6

    b

    20.0

    20.6

    8

    .4

    Protein, gldl

    7.80 7.72

    7.71 .08

    FFA,   M 46.5 45.7

    43.5 2.2

    TO, mgldl

    29.6 32.2 32.9

    2.3

    8 b cMeans

    in rows with different superscripts differ  

    <

    .05).

    Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 76, No. I 1993

    222 SKLAN AND TINSKY

    TABLE 7 Production by cows fed diets similar in undegradable protein but differing in CP, Experiment 2

    Dietary   P

    15.2 16.3 17.5 SE

    Milk, kgld

    36.7

    b

    37.3

    8

    37.3

    8

    .2

    Fat,  

    3 1

    b

    3.06 3.05

    8

    .03

    Fat, kgld

    l.lQb

    1.14

    8

    1.14

    8

      1

    Protein,  

    2.85

    b

    2.88

    8

    2.86

    b

    .01

    Protein. kgld

    1.042

    b

    1.075

    8

    1.067

    8

      6

    3.5 FCM, kgld

    33.8

    b

    34.7

    8

    34.7

    8

     2

    l.hMeans in rows with different superscripts differ

      <

    .05).

    source of enhanced energy supply before and

    at peak lactation

    in

    cows

    fed

    Doublepro was

    indicated

    by

    the tendency of the cows to utilize

    more body reserves for milk synthesis. The

    enhanced partial efficiency of milk production

    may

    be explained by more efficient milk syn

    thesis from long-chain fatty acid precursors

    compared with VFA, as suggested

    by

    Kronfeld

    (8) and Brumby et al (2). Furthermore, synthe

    sis of

    more milk requires higher

    AA

    supply or

    higher quality AA supply to the mammary

    gland, which may have been provided by the

    higher VIP in the present study. However,

    because protein sources varied slightly in the

    different treatments, AA supply to the mam

    mary gland could have differed. Thus, the

    combination of bypass fat and increased AA

    supply to the intestine may provide

    an

    efficient

    combination for improved production in the

    first trimester of lactation.

    Reproductive performance was improved by

    Doublepro, particularly at the first

    AI

    when

    body condition was similar in the two treat

    ments. In a previous report (17), reproductive

    response to CSFA was mainly at the second

    AI However, in that study (17), body condi

    tion scores

    of

    cows fed CSFA reached a mini

    mum and began to increase later in lactation

    than did controls and later than did cows ob-

    served in our study. This difference may indi

    cate that, in that experiment (17), the supply of

    VIP

    in

    early lactation was limiting.

    In

    another situation (Experiment 2),

    Doublepro was used to examine the effect of

    constant dietary VIP but varied CP and DIP.

    Consumption of VIP was at least 1.54 kg/d,

    which is more than adequate based on NRC

    (9) recommendations; DIP were 1.7, 2.1, and

    2.5 kg/d. The NRC (9) recommendation for

    DIP is 2.0 kg at the production tested. Both

    TABLE

    8

    Rumen VFA and NH3 concentrations in rumen fluid and concentrations

    of

    some metabolites in plasma of

    cows fed diets s imilar in undegradable intake protein but differing in CP level, Experiment 2.

    Dietary   P

    15.2

    16.3

    17.5 SE

    Rumen fluid

    Acet ic acid (A), mol/1oo mol

    60.3 59.9

    62.4

    .8

    Propionic acid (P), mol/1oo mol

    24.0 24.3

    23.1 .7

    Butyric acid (B), mol/1oo mol

    13.1

    13.3

    8

    11.2

    b

    .5

    (A

     

    B)/P

    3 1

    3.0 3.2

     1

    NH3, mgldl 15 6<

    18.0

    b

    21.2

    8

    .9

    Plasma

    Urea, mgldl

    14.6

    b

    20.0

    20.6

    8

    .4

    Protein, gldl

    7.80 7.72

    7.71 .08

    FFA,   M 46.5 45.7

    43.5 2.2

    TO, mgldl

    29.6 32.2 32.9

    2.3

    8 b cMeans

    in rows with different superscripts differ  

    <

    .05).

    Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 76, No. I 1993

  • 8/19/2019 sklan1993

    8/8

    BYPASS FAT AND PROTEIN FOR PRODUCTION

    223

    DMI and milk production were depressed in

    cows fed the ration with the lowest CP and

    DIP, probably because of lower rumen

    fermentable N as indicated by lower rumen

    NH3

    concentrations and plasma urea concen

    trations. Milk production and protein produc

    tion decreased, although percentage

    of

    protein

    was not reduced. In a recent study 20)

    in

    which 12 CP was fed compared with 16

    CP from different protein sources, low dietary

    CP content reduced DMI and milk production.

    Milk protein percentage was not changed from

    wk lOin milk when

    12

    CP was fed, al

    though milk protein production decreased.

    Other reports 18, 21) also indicated that low

     P or DIP is accompanied by decreased DMI

    and milk production. Cows that were fed DIP

    close

    to

    or   kg above the percentage calcu

    lated [on the basis

    of

    actual production from

    NRC 9)] showed no differences in milk

    production or composition in the present study.

    Percentages

    of

    UIP were .2 kg more than the

    minimum NRC 9) recommendation; thus, ex

    cess VIP or DIP did not enhance production.

    The use

    of

    CSFA as a coating material to

    decrease degradability of proteins

    in

    the rumen

    can enhance production. Use

    of

    this product to

    increase VIP and to decrease DIP with added

    CSFA in the ftrst trimester of lactation im

    proved production and reproduction. Lack of

    CP and DIP reduced milk production, and

    excess DIP did not improve performance.

      KNOWLEDGMENTS

    This study was supported in part by Bi

    olinol Gmbh, Hamburg, Germany.

    REFEREN ES

    I Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1990.

    Official Methods

    of

    Analysis. 15th ed. AOAC, Arling

    ton, VA.

    2 Brumby, P. E., J. E. Storry,

    J.

    A. Bines, and R.

    J.

    Fulford. 1978. Utilization of energy for maintenance

    and production in dairy cows given protected tallow

    during early lactation.

    J.

    Agric. Sci. Carob.) 91:151.

    3 Chalupa. W., B. Rickabaugh, D. S. Kronfeld, and D.

    SkIan. 1984. Ruminal fermentation in vitro as in

    fluenced by long-chain fatty acids.

    J.

    Dairy Sci. 67:

    1439.

    4 Chalupa, W., B. Vecchiarelli,

    A.

    H. Elser, D. S.

    Kronfeld, D. SkIan, and D. L. Palmquist. 1986. Ru-

    men fermentation in vivo as influenced by long chain

    fatty acids. J. Dairy Sci. 69:1293.

    5 Coulomb, J. J., and

    L.

    Favreau. 1963. A new simple

    semimicro method for the colorimetric determination

    of urea. CIin. Chern. 9:102.

    6 Ferguson,

    J.

    D., D. SkIan, W. Chalupa, and D. S.

    Kronfeld. 1990. Effects of hard fats on the in vitro and

    in vivo rumen fermentat ion, milk product ion, and

    reproduction in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 73:2864.

    7 Jenkins, T. C., and D. L. Palmquist . 1984. Effect of

    fatty acid or calcium soaps on rumen and total nutrient

    digestibility of dairy rations. J. Dairy Sci. 67:978.

    8 Kronfeld, D. S. 1976. The potential importance of the

    proportions of g1ucogenic, lipogenic and aminogenic

    nutrients in regard to the health and productivity of

    dairy cows. Adv. Anim. Nutr. Physiol . 7:7.

    9 National Research Council. 1989. Nutrient Require

    ments of Dairy Cattle. 6th rev. ed. Natl. Acad. Sci .,

    Washington, DC.

    10Palmquist, D. L. 1984. Use of fats in diets for lactat

    ing dairy cows. Page 357   Fats in Animal Nutrition.

    J. Wiseman, ed. Butterworths, London, Engl.

     

    Palmquist , D. L., and

    T.

    C

    Jenkins. 1980. Fat in

    lactation rations: a review.

    J.

    Dairy Sci. 63: 1.

    12 S S S T ~ for Personal Computers. 6th edi tion,

    Version 6.04. 1989. SAS Inst ., Inc., Cary, NC.

    13 Schneider, P., D. SkIan, W. Chalupa. and D. S. Kron

    feld. 1988. Feeding calcium salts of fatty acids to

    lactating cows. J. Dairy Sci. 71:2143.

    14 Sklan, D. 1989. In vitro and in vivo protection of

    proteins coated with calcium soaps of long chain fatty

    acids in ruminants. J. Agric. Sci . Camb.) 112:79.

    15 SkIan, D., A. Arieli, W. Chalupa, and D. S. Kronfeld.

    1985. Digestion and absorption

    of

    lipids and bile acids

    in sheep fed stearic acid, ole ic acid,

    or

    tristearin. J.

    Dairy Sci. 68:1667.

    16 SkIan, D., E. Bogin, Y. Avidar, and S. Gur-Arie.

    1989. Feeding calcium soaps of fatty acids to lactating

    cows: effect on production, body condition and blood

    lipids.

    J.

      airyRes. 56:675.

    17 Sklan, D., U. Moallem, and Y. Folman. 1991. Effect

    of

    feeding calcium soaps

    of

    fatty acids on production

    and reproductive responses in high producing lactating

    cows.

    J.

    Dairy Sci. 74:510.

    18 Stokes, S. R., W.

    H.

    Hoover, T. K. Miller, and R.

    Blauweikel. 1991. Rumina digestion and microbial

    utilization of diets varying in type of carbohydrate and

    protein. J. Dairy Sci. 74:871.

    19 Tyrrell, H. F., and J. T. Reid. 1965. Prediction of the

    energy value of cows milk.

    J.

    Dairy Sci. 48:1215.

    20 Wohlt,

    J.

    E., S. L. Chmiel, P. K Zajac, L. Backer, D.

    B. Blethen, and J. L. Evans. 1991. Dry matter intake,

    milk yield and composition and nitrogen use in Hol

    stein cows fed soybean, fish, or corn gluten meals. J.

    Dairy Sci. 74:1609.

    21

    Zimmerman, C.

    A., A.

    H. Rakes,

    R.

    D. Jacquette, B.

    A. Hopkins, and W.

    J.

    Croom. 1991. Effects

    of

    pro

    tein level and forage source on milk production and

    composit ion in early lactat ion dairy cows. J. Dairy

    Sci. 74:980.

    Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 76, No. I , 1993

    BYPASS FAT AND PROTEIN FOR PRODUCTION

    223

    DMI and milk production were depressed in

    cows fed the ration with the lowest CP and

    DIP, probably because of lower rumen

    fermentable N as indicated by lower rumen

    NH3

    concentrations and plasma urea concen

    trations. Milk production and protein produc

    tion decreased, although percentage

    of

    protein

    was not reduced. In a recent study 20)

    in

    which 12 CP was fed compared with 16

    CP from different protein sources, low dietary

    CP content reduced DMI and milk production.

    Milk protein percentage was not changed from

    wk lOin milk when

    12

    CP was fed, al

    though milk protein production decreased.

    Other reports 18, 21) also indicated that low

     P or DIP is accompanied by decreased DMI

    and milk production. Cows that were fed DIP

    close

    to

    or   kg above the percentage calcu

    lated [on the basis

    of

    actual production from

    NRC 9)] showed no differences in milk

    production or composition in the present study.

    Percentages

    of

    UIP were .2 kg more than the

    minimum NRC 9) recommendation; thus, ex

    cess VIP or DIP did not enhance production.

    The use

    of

    CSFA as a coating material to

    decrease degradability of proteins

    in

    the rumen

    can enhance production. Use

    of

    this product to

    increase VIP and to decrease DIP with added

    CSFA in the ftrst trimester of lactation im

    proved production and reproduction. Lack of

    CP and DIP reduced milk production, and

    excess DIP did not improve performance.

      KNOWLEDGMENTS

    This study was supported in part by Bi

    olinol Gmbh, Hamburg, Germany.

    REFEREN ES

    I Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1990.

    Official Methods

    of

    Analysis. 15th ed. AOAC, Arling

    ton, VA.

    2 Brumby, P. E., J. E. Storry,

    J.

    A. Bines, and R.

    J.

    Fulford. 1978. Utilization of energy for maintenance

    and production in dairy cows given protected tallow

    during early lactation.

    J.

    Agric. Sci. Carob.) 91:151.

    3 Chalupa. W., B. Rickabaugh, D. S. Kronfeld, and D.

    SkIan. 1984. Ruminal fermentation in vitro as in

    fluenced by long-chain fatty acids.

    J.

    Dairy Sci. 67:

    1439.

    4 Chalupa, W., B. Vecchiarelli,

    A.

    H. Elser, D. S.

    Kronfeld, D. SkIan, and D. L. Palmquist. 1986. Ru-

    men fermentation in vivo as influenced by long chain

    fatty acids. J. Dairy Sci. 69:1293.

    5 Coulomb, J. J., and

    L.

    Favreau. 1963. A new simple

    semimicro method for the colorimetric determination

    of urea. CIin. Chern. 9:102.

    6 Ferguson,

    J.

    D., D. SkIan, W. Chalupa, and D. S.

    Kronfeld. 1990. Effects of hard fats on the in vitro and

    in vivo rumen fermentat ion, milk product ion, and

    reproduction in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 73:2864.

    7 Jenkins, T. C., and D. L. Palmquist . 1984. Effect of

    fatty acid or calcium soaps on rumen and total nutrient

    digestibility of dairy rations. J. Dairy Sci. 67:978.

    8 Kronfeld, D. S. 1976. The potential importance of the

    proportions of g1ucogenic, lipogenic and aminogenic

    nutrients in regard to the health and productivity of

    dairy cows. Adv. Anim. Nutr. Physiol . 7:7.

    9 National Research Council. 1989. Nutrient Require

    ments of Dairy Cattle. 6th rev. ed. Natl. Acad. Sci .,

    Washington, DC.

    10Palmquist, D. L. 1984. Use of fats in diets for lactat

    ing dairy cows. Page 357   Fats in Animal Nutrition.

    J. Wiseman, ed. Butterworths, London, Engl.

     

    Palmquist , D. L., and

    T.

    C

    Jenkins. 1980. Fat in

    lactation rations: a review.

    J.

    Dairy Sci. 63: 1.

    12 S S S T ~ for Personal Computers. 6th edi tion,

    Version 6.04. 1989. SAS Inst ., Inc., Cary, NC.

    13 Schneider, P., D. SkIan, W. Chalupa. and D. S. Kron

    feld. 1988. Feeding calcium salts of fatty acids to

    lactating cows. J. Dairy Sci. 71:2143.

    14 Sklan, D. 1989. In vitro and in vivo protection of

    proteins coated with calcium soaps of long chain fatty

    acids in ruminants. J. Agric. Sci . Camb.) 112:79.

    15 SkIan, D., A. Arieli, W. Chalupa, and D. S. Kronfeld.

    1985. Digestion and absorption

    of

    lipids and bile acids

    in sheep fed stearic acid, ole ic acid,

    or

    tristearin. J.

    Dairy Sci. 68:1667.

    16 SkIan, D., E. Bogin, Y. Avidar, and S. Gur-Arie.

    1989. Feeding calcium soaps of fatty acids to lactating

    cows: effect on production, body condition and blood

    lipids.

    J.

      airyRes. 56:675.

    17 Sklan, D., U. Moallem, and Y. Folman. 1991. Effect

    of

    feeding calcium soaps

    of

    fatty acids on production

    and reproductive responses in high producing lactating

    cows.

    J.

    Dairy Sci. 74:510.

    18 Stokes, S. R., W.

    H.

    Hoover, T. K. Miller, and R.

    Blauweikel. 1991. Rumina digestion and microbial

    utilization of diets varying in type of carbohydrate and

    protein. J. Dairy Sci. 74:871.

    19 Tyrrell, H. F., and J. T. Reid. 1965. Prediction of the

    energy value of cows milk.

    J.

    Dairy Sci. 48:1215.

    20 Wohlt,

    J.

    E., S. L. Chmiel, P. K Zajac, L. Backer, D.

    B. Blethen, and J. L. Evans. 1991. Dry matter intake,

    milk yield and composition and nitrogen use in Hol

    stein cows fed soybean, fish, or corn gluten meals. J.

    Dairy Sci. 74:1609.

    21

    Zimmerman, C.

    A., A.

    H. Rakes,

    R.

    D. Jacquette, B.

    A. Hopkins, and W.

    J.

    Croom. 1991. Effects

    of

    pro

    tein level and forage source on milk production and

    composit ion in early lactat ion dairy cows. J. Dairy

    Sci. 74:980.

    Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 76, No. I , 1993