VECETATIO!, OF CAFNATIO}: CREEK STREAHRED C2:;/JC/, Ie. P,F,RC /f'C'-P-/:z Pr Sir:;:; ;- fiC6 "' .......... '" ' , >_. -',. '-' . i ....... VIC, v'IA, :3.C. b:: E. T. (lSh'ALD J Canadian Forestry Service Pacific Forest Research Centre \'ic:toria, B.C. BC-·P-12 Department of the Environment Harch, 1975
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
VECETATIO!, OF CAFNATIO}: CREEK STREAHRED
C2:;/JC/, Ie.P,F,RC
/f'C'-P-/:z
Pr Sir:;:; ;- A~"::3fiC6 "' ..........~T '" '
~'r.'· ,>_. -',. '-' . i .......
VIC, v'IA, :3.C.
b::
E. T. (lSh'ALD J
Canadian Forestry Service
Pacific Forest Research Centre
\'ic:toria, B.C.
BC-·P-12
Department of the Environment
Harch, 1975
VEGETATION OF CARNATION CREEK STREANBED
INTRODUCTIOK
Carnation Creek WRtershed was selected by the Fisheries Service
of Environment Canada for an intensive investigation into the effects of
forest harvesting operations on salmonid fish populations. The creek,
located north of Sarita River~ empties into Trevor Channel of Barkley Sound,
on the vlest coast of Vancouver Island. The Canaciian Forestry SE~rvice
undertook the classification and mapping of vegetation and soils of the
watershed.
A survey of vep,etation and soils of the lower or western portion
of the watershed was initiated and completed in 1972 (Oswald, 1973), and
was extended to the upper portion of the watershed during 1973 (Oswald,
1974). Because of the importance of vegetation along the stream channel
for oupplying food and cover for fish, a more intensive survey of the
stream-side vegetation was un aken than that conducted on the uplandII
areas. Results of this investigation are hereby presented as a preliminary
report.
HETHODS
Detailed analysis and survey of tree distribution and ground
vegetation v/as conducted from lov;'-level 70-mm color aerial photography
(scale approximately 1:2400) by the B.C. Forest Service, using a helicopter
equipped with two Hasselblad cameras mounted on a floating boom suspended
beneath the aircraft. Conventional panchromatic aerial photographs, at
a scale of 1:15,840, were used for broader coverage. Plant species
distribution along the banks and the canopy coverage over the stream
channel were estimated by traverses up the stream channel and along the
- 2 -
stream banks. The soils were examined along the cut banks of the streaM
and, in a few locations, in the floodplain. However, because of the
intricate heterogeneity of the soils, typical of streams undergoing
continual change promoted principally by log jams, no attempt was made
to map the soils.
RESULTS
The stream consisted of a gently inclined lower reach of about
3100 meters with a floodplain of variable width, a steeply inclined
central reach of about 1000 meters containing falls impassible to anadromous
fish and possessing virtually no floodplain, followed by another reach of
gentle incline. The primary concern of vegetation mapping was in the
lower reach (Figure 1); however, some data were also collected for the
upper reaches.
The tree cover on the lower reach consisted primarily of western
hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla) and western red cedar (Thuja plicata), with
some red alder (Alnus rubra), amabilis fir (Abies amabilis) and Sitka
spruce (Picea sitchensis). The distribution of conifer species appeared
to be at random because no correlation between species occurrence and
physical site parameters could be established. Alder required an opening
for establishment but, once established, persisted for an indefinite
period. Conifers succeeded the alder in most areas, but the rate of
succession depended on site conditions; succession is usually slo\~er on
wet than on moist sites. Currently, alder forms a narrow discontinuous
fringe along the banks of the lower reach and a few clusters occur
primarily where alterations in the stream channel have formed suitable
conditions (Fig, 1). Alder, rather than conifers, is believed to contribute
- 3 -
more food to fish populations through direct insect drop or by insect
eggs and casts deposited in the water during leaf fall.
Along the steep banks of the middle reach, the tree cover
consisted of western hemlock, amabilis fir and red cedar. Few alder
saplings occurred along this reach because their survival is jeopardized
by periodic high flood levels. On the upper reach, the tree cover was
essentially the same as on the lower reach.
The understory vegetation on the lower reach was more closely
attuned to the physical site characteristics than the tree cover. Salal
(Gaultheria shallon) occurred on elevated sites, such as rocky knolls,
stumps or logs. Huckleberries (Vaccinium parvifolium and ~' ovalifoliurn)
were often present on moist sites and swordfern (Polysticum TIlunitum) on
somewhat wetter sites under a forest canopy. Salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis),
stink current (Ribes bracteosum), red-berry elder (Sambucus callicarpa)
and false azalea (Menziesia ferr~ginea) occurred on these sites in forest
openings and along the stream banks not covered by forest canopy. On
dry and moist sites, the predominant forbs included foam flower (Tiarella
trifoliata), wild lily-of-the-valley (Maianthemum dilatatum), western
trillium (Trillium ovatum) and oak-fern (Gymnocarpum drcpteris). The
vegetation of the bog and fen sites included skunk cabbage (Lysichitum
americanum) , Indian hellebore (Veratrum viride), silver-green (Adenocaulon