Top Banner

of 26

Single VS. Multiple Textbox Event Creation Experiment

Apr 09, 2018

Download

Documents

Filip Mares
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • 8/8/2019 Single VS. Multiple Textbox Event Creation Experiment

    1/26

    Single VS. Multiple

    Textbox EventCreation Experiment

    Filip Mares TIM Carleton University

  • 8/8/2019 Single VS. Multiple Textbox Event Creation Experiment

    2/26

    Outline

    Background

    Experiment Method

    Analysis

    Future Experiments Conclusion

  • 8/8/2019 Single VS. Multiple Textbox Event Creation Experiment

    3/26

  • 8/8/2019 Single VS. Multiple Textbox Event Creation Experiment

    4/26

  • 8/8/2019 Single VS. Multiple Textbox Event Creation Experiment

    5/26

    Twegather

    Started in Summer 2009

    Joint project for TeamCampmembers

    Team of 5 active members

    Close to a Minimum ViableProduct (MVP)

    Create anevent with3 mouseclicks

  • 8/8/2019 Single VS. Multiple Textbox Event Creation Experiment

    6/26

    Difference from competition

    Simple event creation process

    Registration not required for creating

    RSVP via Social Networks

    TwitterFacebook (soon)

    Free

  • 8/8/2019 Single VS. Multiple Textbox Event Creation Experiment

    7/26

    Experiment

  • 8/8/2019 Single VS. Multiple Textbox Event Creation Experiment

    8/26

    Experiment

    Natural Process

    Increase event creation

    Reduce creation process difficulty

    Re-design front page

  • 8/8/2019 Single VS. Multiple Textbox Event Creation Experiment

    9/26

  • 8/8/2019 Single VS. Multiple Textbox Event Creation Experiment

    10/26

    Hypotheses

    H1: Participants will create events quicker onaverage using the proposed page designopposed to the current page.

    H2: Participants will make fewer mistakes whencreating events using the current designopposed to the proposed design.

    H3:Participants will prefer the proposedTwegather event creation page to the existingevent creation page design.

  • 8/8/2019 Single VS. Multiple Textbox Event Creation Experiment

    11/26

    Method

    A/B testDesign A Current

    Design B Proposed

    8 participants Recorded screen with software

    Pre-thought event

  • 8/8/2019 Single VS. Multiple Textbox Event Creation Experiment

    12/26

    Metrics

    Completion Time

    Errors Encountered

    QuestionnaireLIKERT

    Designs Preference

    Designs Difficulty

    Comments

  • 8/8/2019 Single VS. Multiple Textbox Event Creation Experiment

    13/26

    Participants will create events quicker onaverage using the proposed page designopposed to the current page.

    Hypothesis 1

  • 8/8/2019 Single VS. Multiple Textbox Event Creation Experiment

    14/26

    Completion Time

    Mean: 41.5

    seconds SD: 13.6 seconds

    Mean: 22.75

    seconds SD: 7.28 seconds

    Design A Design B

  • 8/8/2019 Single VS. Multiple Textbox Event Creation Experiment

    15/26

    Completion Time

    P Value: 0.0091

    Group comparison:

    Design A pval: 0.779Design B pval: 0.7648

    Hypothesis VerifiedDesign A is faster to

    complete

  • 8/8/2019 Single VS. Multiple Textbox Event Creation Experiment

    16/26

    Participants will make fewer mistakeswhen creating events using the currentdesign opposed to the proposed design.

    Hypothesis 2

  • 8/8/2019 Single VS. Multiple Textbox Event Creation Experiment

    17/26

    Errors Encountered

    Mean: 1.38 errors

    SD: 0.52 errors

    Mean: 0.625

    errors SD: 0.625 errors

    Design A Design B

  • 8/8/2019 Single VS. Multiple Textbox Event Creation Experiment

    18/26

    Errors Encountered

    P Value: 0.0199

    Group Comparison:

    Group A pval:0.6376

    Group B pval: 0.39

    Hypothesisrejected

    Design B had lesserrors

  • 8/8/2019 Single VS. Multiple Textbox Event Creation Experiment

    19/26

    Participants will prefer the proposed Twegather event

    creation page to the existing event creation pagedesign.

    Hypothesis 3

  • 8/8/2019 Single VS. Multiple Textbox Event Creation Experiment

    20/26

    Design Preference

    Mean: 3.5/5

    rating SD: 0.93

    Mean: 3.63/5

    Rating SD: 1.19

    Design A Design B

    Note: (really disliked) 1 5 (really liked)

  • 8/8/2019 Single VS. Multiple Textbox Event Creation Experiment

    21/26

    Design Preference

    P value: 0.8565

    Group Comparison:Group A pval: 1

    Group B pval: 0.788 Hypothesis

    rejectedThere were no

    obvious preferreddesign

  • 8/8/2019 Single VS. Multiple Textbox Event Creation Experiment

    22/26

    Threats to Validity

    Typing skill level

    Internet connection

    Test Environment

  • 8/8/2019 Single VS. Multiple Textbox Event Creation Experiment

    23/26

    Participant Feedback

    Single textbox hard at 1st, easierafterwards

    Multiple textbox requires less thinking

    Multiple textbox followed order of otherservices

    Good parsing of regular phrases in single

    textbox

  • 8/8/2019 Single VS. Multiple Textbox Event Creation Experiment

    24/26

    Future Experiments

    Event syntax auto-completion vs.preview

    Event creation workflow

  • 8/8/2019 Single VS. Multiple Textbox Event Creation Experiment

    25/26

    Conclusion

    Event creation completed faster withsingle textbox

    Less errors encountered in single

    textbox design Participants did not have a strong

    favorite design

  • 8/8/2019 Single VS. Multiple Textbox Event Creation Experiment

    26/26

    Questions?

    Thank You