Single-phase fluid flow GUIDELINE TO PIPE SIZING FOR SINGLE-PHASE FLOW AUTHOR: VIKRAM SHARMA DATE: 7 th MARCH 2017
Single-phase fluid flowGUIDELINE TO PIPE SIZING FOR SINGLE-PHASE FLOW
AUTHOR: VIKRAM SHARMADATE: 7th MARCH 2017
Table of ContentsIntroductionBernoulli’s EquationFriction factor graphPressure Drop in Pipe and FittingsRecommended fluid velocitiesCalculation MethodologyReferences
IntroductionPipe is a common sight in chemical plantPipework & fittings:
◦ ≈ 20-30% of the total design cost; ◦ ≈ 10-20% of the total plant investment; and◦ Other added cost due to maintenance req. & energy
usage in the form of ΔP in the fluids being pumpedThe size of a pipe (diameter) is expressed in
two ways that are:◦ Nominal Pipe Size (NPS); and◦ Diametre Nominal (DN)
NPS is measured in inches, DN is measured in mm
DN is generally equiv. to NPS multiplied by 25
Introduction (cont’d)DN is generally equiv. to NPS multiplied by 25
except:◦ NPS ½ is DN15◦ NPS 3 is DN80
Pipe size are designated by two numbers that are (i) pipe diameter and (ii) thickness
Pipe diameter is generally associated with inside dia.
Outside dia. is the same for a given size → maintain certain interchangeability of pipe fittings
NPS 14 and beyond, it is equal to the outside dia. (OD) in inch.
Introduction (cont’d)NPS 14 and beyond, it is equal to the outside
dia. (OD) in inch. (cont’d)Pipe wall thickness is referred to pipe
schedule (Sch)Standardize from 5 to 160 → determined by
the service req. like Pressure, Temp., Flow and corrosion
Pipe wall thickness ↑ Pipe Schedule ↑
Bernoulli’s Equation ΔP or head loss in a piping system is caused by:
◦ Elevation;◦ Friction;◦ Shaft work; and◦ Turbulence due to sudden change in direction or cross
sectional area Mechanical Energy Balance (MEB) eq.→ conservation of sum
of pressure, kinetic and potential energies, net heat transfer (q), work done by the system (w) and frictional energy (ef).
ef is usually +ve & represents the rate of irreversible conversion of mech. energy into thermal energy
Sometimes called head loss, friction loss or frictional pressure drop.
Bernoulli’s Equation (cont’d)
Bernoulli’s Equation (cont’d) The first 3 terms (pressure, velocity & elevation) are
point functions → depend only on conditions at the inlet & outlet of the system
w and ef are path functions → depend on what is happening to the system between the inlet and outlet points
ef loss due to friction and includes losses due to flow through lengths of pipe, fittings such as elbows, valves, orifices and pipe entrances and exits
Bernoulli’s Equation (cont’d)
Kf is the excess head loss due to pipe or pipe fittings, v is the fluid velocity
Fluids flowing through pipes;
ΔP is the same due to flow is the same whether the pipe is horizontal, vertical or inclined
Friction factor
Friction factor is expressed as Moody friction factor (fM) or Fanning friction factor (fF).
fM = 4fF
Friction factor (cont’d) Laminar region (or viscous): Re < 2,000 “Critical zone” is the transition frm. laminar to
turbulent: 2,000 < Re < 4,000. Turbulent flow: Re > 4,000 Friction factor is laminar region is not affected by the
relative roughness (ε/D) but it is influenced by the fluid viscosity
Friction factor at transition region strongly depends on both the Re and ε/D
Friction factor at turbulent region is independent of Re and is a function of relative roughness (ε/D).
Friction factor (cont’d) Friction factor can be computed using two equations
based on the fluid flow regime. Laminar flow (Re < 2,000) : Turbulent flow (Re > 4,000): Reynolds Number:
◦ fD = Darcy friction factor◦ ε = Absolute pipe roughness (m):
Carbon Steel = 0.02-0.05 mm Stainless steel = 0.03 mm
◦ D = Pipe inner diameter (m)◦ ρ = Fluid density (kg/m3)◦ µ = Dynamic viscosity (Ns/m2)
Friction factor (cont’d) Colebrook’s equation require iteration to determine the
friction factor. Author propose Churchill (1977) equation that allows
engineers to determine the friction factor for both laminar and turbulent flows.
Pressure Drop in Pipe and Fittings ΔP for straight pipe run: Pressure drop for fittings can be computed using
resistance coefficient method (K). This could be done via Darby 3-K method for fittings
Why Darby 3-K method is preferred?◦ Accounts directly for the effect of both Re & fitting size on the
loss coefficient.
Pressure Drop in Pipe and Fittings (cont’d) Other option: The Equivalent Length Method (Leq/D) The Leq/D method assumes that:
◦ Size of fittings of a given type can be scaled corresponding to a given dia.◦ Reynolds number on the friction loss is the same as the pipe loss
The above assumptions are incorrect. Why? The laminar or turbulent flow within a valve or a fitting
is generally quite different from that of straight pipe. With this, there is an uncertainty when determining the
effect of Re on the loss coefficients. Leq/D method does not account for the lack of exact
scaling for valves and fittings
Pressure Drop in Pipe and Fittings (cont’d)For Darby 3-K constants, refer to:
◦ https://neutrium.net/fluid_flow/pressure-loss-from-fittings-3k-method/
For other fittings such as sudden pipe contractions, square reduction, tapered reduction, sharp orifice, square expansion, tapered expansion, thick orifice and pipe reduce, refer to Coker (2007)
Recommended fluid velocitiesTypical velocities and pressure drop:
◦ Liquid (pumped, not viscous): 1-3 m/s, 0.5 kPa/m◦ Liquid (gravity flow): - m/s , 0.05 kPa/m◦ Gases & vapours: 15-30 m/s, 0.02 % of the line
pressure◦ HP steam (> 8 bar): 30-60 m/s, - kPa/m
Typical velocities at pump suction and discharge lines:
Recommended fluid velocities (cont’d)Typical velocities and pressure drop for
single-phase gas process lines:
Calculation Methodology Obtain the piping layout from PFD, P&IDs or Piping
Isometrics Obtain data at fluid inlet of the pipe corresponding to
inlet temperature and pressure. Info req. are mass flow, ρ, µ, T & P.
Select a pipe size and material (Refer to Slide #5) Calc. the fluid velocity. Ensure it comply with the fluid
req. (Refer to Slide #17) Calc. Re → Laminar or Turbulent (Refer to Slide #12) Calc. the fD → Churchill’s (1977) eq. (Refer to Slide #13) Calc. the ΔPbar/100m of the straight pipe. Include elevation
(Refer to Slide #14). Calc. ΔPbar by multiplying with pipe straight length
Calculation Methodology (cont’d)Calc. ΔP of fittings. Use Darby 3-K method and
Coker (2007) (Refer to Slide #16 and Slide #14)
Calc. ΔP of other items such as process equipment etc.
Calc. the total pressure drop of the system (ΣP)◦ ΣPT = ΔPfriction + ΔPfittings + ΔPother items
Check if downstream pressure P2 is as per specifications. ◦ P2 = P1 - ΣPT
If not, repeat the above calc. by selecting a different pipe size
References Bahadori, A. (2014). Process pipe sizing for plants
location. In Natural Gas Processing: Technology and Engineering Design (p. 83). Oxford: Gulf Professional Publishing.
Murty, K. K. (2010). Sizes, Schedules, And Standards. In All-in-One Manual of Industrial Piping Practice and Maintenance On-The-Job Solutions, Tips and Insights (p. 52). New York: Industrial Press.
Native Dynamics. (2012, May 19). Neutrium. Retrieved March 7, 2017, from Absolute Roughness of Pipe Material: https://neutrium.net/fluid_flow/absolute-roughness/
Sinnot, R. K. (2005). Piping and Instrumentation. In Chemical Engineering Design (Vol. 6, p. 218). Oxford: Elsevier.