11 May 05 Page 1 of 2 Single Drill Sergeant School Recommendation: Realign Fort Benning, GA, and Fort Leonard Wood, MO, by relocating the Drill Sergeant School at each location to Fort Jackson, SC. Justification: This recommendation consolidates Drill Sergeant’s Training from three locations (Fort Benning, Fort Jackson, and Fort Leonard Wood) to one location (Fort Jackson), which fosters consistency, standardization and training proficiency. It enhances military value, supports the Army’s force structure plan, and maintains sufficient surge capability to address future unforeseen requirements. This recommendation supports Army Transformation by collocating institutional training, MTOE units, RDTE organizations and other TDA units in large numbers on single installations to support force stabilization and engage training. It improves training capabilities while eliminating excess capacity at institutional training installations, and provides the same or better level of service at a reduced cost. Payback: The total estimated one-time cost to the Department of Defense to implement this recommendation is $1.8M. The net of all costs and savings to the Department of Defense during the implementation period is a saving of $7.6M. Annual recurring savings to the Department after implementation are $2.5M with a payback expected within one year. The net present value of the costs and savings to the Department over 20 years is a savings of $31.3M. Economic Impact on Communities: Assuming no economic recover, this recommendation could result in a maximum potential reduction of 171 jobs (121 direct and 50 indirect jobs) over the 2006 – 2011 period in the Columbus GA-AL Metropolitan area, which is 0.1 percent of economic area employment. Assuming no economic recovery, this recommendation could result in a maximum potential reduction of 237 jobs (183 direct and 54 indirect jobs) over the 2006 – 2011 period in the Ft. Leonard Wood, MO Metropolitan area, which is 0.9 percent of economic area employment. The aggregate economic impact of all recommended actions on these economic regions of influence was considered and is at Appendix B of Volume I. Community Infrastructure Assessment: A review of community attributes revealed no significant issues regarding the ability of the local community’s infrastructure to support missions, forces, and personnel. There are no known community infrastruc ture impediments to implementation of all recommendations affecting the installations in this recommendation. Environmental Impact: An Air Conformity determination and New Source Review and permitting effort will be required at Fort Jackson. This recommendation has no impact on cultural, archeological, or tribal resources; dredging; land use constraints or sensitive resource areas; marine mammals, resources, or sanctuaries; noise; threatened and DCN: 1688
96
Embed
Single Drill Sergeant School Recommendation: Realign …/67531/metadc15309/m2/1/high... · Single Drill Sergeant School Recommendation: Realign Fort Benning, ... Fort Bragg 1,912
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
11 May 05
Page 1 of 2
Single Drill Sergeant School
Recommendation: Realign Fort Benning, GA, and Fort Leonard Wood, MO, by relocating the Drill Sergeant School at each location to Fort Jackson, SC. Justification: This recommendation consolidates Drill Sergeant’s Training from three locations (Fort Benning, Fort Jackson, and Fort Leonard Wood) to one location (Fort Jackson), which fosters consistency, standardization and training proficiency. It enhances military value, supports the Army’s force structure plan, and maintains sufficient surge capability to address future unforeseen requirements. This recommendation supports Army Transformation by collocating institutional training, MTOE units, RDTE organizations and other TDA units in large numbers on single installations to support force stabilization and engage training. It improves training capabilities while eliminating excess capacity at institutional training installations, and provides the same or better level of service at a reduced cost. Payback: The total estimated one-time cost to the Department of Defense to implement this recommendation is $1.8M. The net of all costs and savings to the Department of Defense during the implementation period is a saving of $7.6M. Annual recurring savings to the Department after implementation are $2.5M with a payback expected within one year. The net present value of the costs and savings to the Department over 20 years is a savings of $31.3M. Economic Impact on Communities: Assuming no economic recover, this recommendation could result in a maximum potential reduction of 171 jobs (121 direct and 50 indirect jobs) over the 2006 – 2011 period in the Columbus GA-AL Metropolitan area, which is 0.1 percent of economic area employment. Assuming no economic recovery, this recommendation could result in a maximum potential reduction of 237 jobs (183 direct and 54 indirect jobs) over the 2006 – 2011 period in the Ft. Leonard Wood, MO Metropolitan area, which is 0.9 percent of economic area employment. The aggregate economic impact of all recommended actions on these economic regions of influence was considered and is at Appendix B of Volume I. Community Infrastructure Assessment: A review of community attributes revealed no significant issues regarding the ability of the local community’s infrastructure to support missions, forces, and personnel. There are no known community infrastruc ture impediments to implementation of all recommendations affecting the installations in this recommendation. Environmental Impact: An Air Conformity determination and New Source Review and permitting effort will be required at Fort Jackson. This recommendation has no impact on cultural, archeological, or tribal resources; dredging; land use constraints or sensitive resource areas; marine mammals, resources, or sanctuaries; noise; threatened and
DCN: 1688
11 May 05
Page 2 of 2
endangered species or critical habitat; waste management; water resources; or wetlands. This recommendation will require spending approximately $0.3M for environmental compliance costs. These costs were included in the payback calculation. This recommendation does not otherwise impact the costs of environmental restoration, waste management, and environmental compliance activities. The aggregate environmental impact of all recommended BRAC actions affecting the installations in this recommendation has been reviewed. There are no known environmental impediments to implementation of this recommendation. recommendation.
Max Capacity CapacityAll SF values are in Thousands Current Current Potential Available to Required to Excess
Max Capacity CapacityCurrent Current Potential Available to Required to ExcessCapacity Usage Capacity Surge Surge Capacity
SF1 SF1 Acres2 SF3 SF4 SF1
McAlester AAP 201 121 29,732 0 0 80Milan AAP 63 2 1,848 0 0 61Military Ocean Tml Sunny Point 41 41 2,000 0 0 0Mississippi AAP 219 0 1,558 0 0 219Newport Chem Depot 30 6 6,095 0 0 24NTC and Fort Irwin CA 77 280 1,000 0 0 -203Picatinny Arsenal 894 666 2,900 0 0 228Pine Bluff Arsenal 162 105 27 0 0 57Presidio of Monterey 489 630 114 0 0 -141Pueblo Chem Depot 119 13 14,122 0 0 106Radford AAP 182 14 343 0 0 168Red River Army Depot 183 229 1,213 0 0 -46Redstone Arsenal 2,805 3,406 4,194 0 0 -601Riverbank AAP 12 0 25 0 0 12Rock Island Arsenal 1,656 1,033 336 0 0 623Schofield Barracks 302 718 125 0 0 -416Scranton AAP 33 1 1 0 0 32Sierra Army Depot 73 35 9,139 0 0 38Soldier Systems Center 243 269 46 0 0 -26Tobyhanna Army Depot 336 346 721 0 0 -10Tooele Army Depot 43 132 13,460 0 0 -89Tripler Army Medical Center 63 160 43 0 0 -97Umatilla Chem Depot 42 31 0 0 0 11US Army Garrison Selfridge 58 48 110 0 0 10Walter Reed AMC 497 396 3 0 0 101Watervliet Arsenal 105 101 6 0 0 4West Point Mil Reservation 1,708 778 357 0 0 930White Sands Missile Range 813 924 119,133 0 0 -111Yuma Proving Ground 160 103 34,871 0 0 57
Notes:1Square Footage (SF) includes General Purpose Instructional buildings, Applied Instructional buildings, and General Administrative Buildings. SF values are in thousands.
2Max Potential Capacity is stated as buildable acres. For comparison purposes, a large Army School (e.g. the Infantry School at Fort Benning) requires approximately 790 buildable acres. The listed acreage is available for all missions on the installation.
3Square Footage (SF) of General Purpose Instructional buildings, Applied Instructional buildings, and General Administrative Buildings are generally used to capacity (as measured bythe use of one 8-hour shift per day) at most Army installations. Depending on an installations currentuse of multiple shifts, capacity can be increased by adding the number of shifts used each day.Currently, several Army installations function with multiple shifts.
4There is no specified surge requirement for institutional training.
DRAFT DELIBERATIVE DOCUMENT - FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY - NOT RELEASABLE UNDER FOIA
This document may contain information protected from disclosure by public law, regulations or orders.
Army Military Value Results
Includes the overall value for each of 87 installations and 10 leases.
Includes the ranking for each of six Army Capabilities for each of 87 installations and 10 leases.
Deliberate Document - For Discussion Purpose Only - Do Not release Under FOIA
Deliberate Document - For Discussion Purpose Only - Do Not release Under FOIA USA-0046Rv2 DS School Consolidation to Ft. Jackson.doc Page 4 of 45
COBRA PERSONNEL/SF/SUSTAINMENT/RECAP/BOS DELTAS REPORT (COBRA v6.10) Data As Of 04/26/2005 1:53:21 PM, Report Created 05/10/2005 3:59:03 PM Department : Army Scenario File : J:\RECOMMENDATION DEVELOPMENT\REVIEW FINAL\Completed\Sent to OSD\USA-0046Rv2 DS School Consolidation to Ft. Jackson\DS Consolidation (JAX) 04-13-51.CBR Option Pkg Name: Drill Sergeant Consolidation (Jackson) Std Fctrs File : D:\Army COBRA 6.10\BRAC2005.SFF Personnel Base Start* Finish* Change %Change ---- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------- BENNING 29,932 29,811 -121 0% LEONARD WOOD 27,251 27,068 -183 -1% JACKSON 23,382 23,661 279 1% ----- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------- TOTAL 80,565 80,540 -25 0% Square Footage Base Start Finish Change %Change Chg/Per ---- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------- -------- BENNING 24,223,000 24,223,000 0 0% 0 LEONARD WOOD 14,756,000 14,756,000 0 0% 0 JACKSON 12,687,000 12,687,000 0 0% 0 ----- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------- -------- TOTAL 51,666,000 51,666,000 0 0% 0 Base Operations Support (2005$) Base Start* Finish* Change %Change Chg/Per ---- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------- -------- BENNING 87,593,801 87,330,567 -263,234 0% 2,175 LEONARD WOOD 53,983,018 53,720,162 -262,855 0% 1,436 JACKSON 41,958,173 42,305,398 347,225 1% 1,244 ----- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------- -------- TOTAL 183,534,992 183,356,128 -178,865 0% 7,154 Sustainment (2005$) Base Start Finish Change %Change Chg/Per ---- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------- -------- BENNING 36,947,660 36,947,660 0 0% 0 LEONARD WOOD 42,381,520 42,381,520 0 0% 0 JACKSON 24,455,930 24,464,389 8,459 0% 30 ----- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------- -------- TOTAL 103,785,110 103,793,569 8,459 0% -338 Recapitalization (2005$) Base Start Finish Change %Change Chg/Per ---- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------- -------- BENNING 29,159,300 29,159,300 0 0% 0 LEONARD WOOD 27,567,645 27,567,645 0 0% 0 JACKSON 18,901,934 18,907,277 5,343 0% 19 ----- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------- -------- TOTAL 75,628,879 75,634,223 5,343 0% -214 Sustain + Recap + BOS (2005$) Base Start Finish Change %Change Chg/Per ---- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------- -------- BENNING 153,700,762 153,437,528 -263,234 0% 2,175 LEONARD WOOD 123,932,183 123,669,327 -262,855 0% 1,436 JACKSON 85,316,037 85,677,064 361,027 0% 1,294 ----- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------- -------- TOTAL 362,948,981 362,783,919 -165,062 0% 6,602
Deliberate Document - For Discussion Purpose Only - Do Not release Under FOIA
Deliberate Document - For Discussion Purpose Only - Do Not release Under FOIA USA-0046Rv2 DS School Consolidation to Ft. Jackson.doc Page 5 of 45
COBRA PERSONNEL/SF/SUSTAINMENT/RECAP/BOS DELTAS REPORT (COBRA v6.10) - Page 2 Data As Of 04/26/2005 1:53:21 PM, Report Created 05/10/2005 3:59:03 PM Department : Army Scenario File : J:\RECOMMENDATION DEVELOPMENT\REVIEW FINAL\Completed\Sent to OSD\USA-0046Rv2 DS School Consolidation to Ft. Jackson\DS Consolidation (JAX) 04-13-51.CBR Option Pkg Name: Drill Sergeant Consolidation (Jackson) Std Fctrs File : D:\Army COBRA 6.10\BRAC2005.SFF Plant Replacement Value (2005$) Base Start Finish Change %Change Chg/Per ---- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------- -------- BENNING 3,003,407,940 3,003,407,940 0 0% 0 LEONARD WOOD 2,839,467,440 2,839,467,440 0 0% 0 JACKSON 1,946,899,180 1,947,449,565 550,385 0% 1,973 ----- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------- -------- TOTAL 7,789,774,560 7,790,324,945 550,385 0% -22,015
Deliberate Document - For Discussion Purpose Only - Do Not release Under FOIA
Deliberate Document - For Discussion Purpose Only - Do Not release Under FOIA USA-0046Rv2 DS School Consolidation to Ft. Jackson.doc Page 6 of 45
COBRA PERSONNEL/SF/SUSTAINMENT/RECAP/BOS DELTAS REPORT (COBRA v6.10) - Page 3 Data As Of 04/26/2005 1:53:21 PM, Report Created 05/10/2005 3:59:03 PM Department : Army Scenario File : J:\RECOMMENDATION DEVELOPMENT\REVIEW FINAL\Completed\Sent to OSD\USA-0046Rv2 DS School Consolidation to Ft. Jackson\DS Consolidation (JAX) 04-13-51.CBR Option Pkg Name: Drill Sergeant Consolidation (Jackson) Std Fctrs File : D:\Army COBRA 6.10\BRAC2005.SFF * "Start" and "Finish" values for Personnel and BOS both include the Programmed Installation Population (non-BRAC) Changes, so that only changes attributable to the BRAC action are reflected in the "Change" columns of this report.
Deliberate Document - For Discussion Purpose Only - Do Not release Under FOIA
Deliberate Document - For Discussion Purpose Only - Do Not release Under FOIA USA-0046Rv2 DS School Consolidation to Ft. Jackson.doc Page 7 of 45
Deliberate Document - For Discussion Purpose Only - Do Not release Under FOIA
Deliberate Document - For Discussion Purpose Only - Do Not release Under FOIA USA-0046Rv2 DS School Consolidation to Ft. Jackson.doc Page 25 of 45
COBRA INPUT DATA REPORT (COBRA v6.10) - Page 6 Data As Of 04/26/2005 1:53:21 PM, Report Created 05/10/2005 3:59:01 PM Department : Army Scenario File : J:\RECOMMENDATION DEVELOPMENT\REVIEW FINAL\Completed\Sent to OSD\USA-0046Rv2 DS School Consolidation to Ft. Jackson\DS Consolidation (JAX) 04-13-51.CBR Option Pkg Name: Drill Sergeant Consolidation (Jackson) Std Fctrs File : D:\Army COBRA 6.10\BRAC2005.SFF STANDARD FACTORS SCREEN ONE - PERSONNEL SF File Descrip: Perc Officers Accompanied: 72.00% Priority Placement Program: 39.97% Perc Enlisted Accompanied: 55.00% PPP Actions Involving PCS: 50.70% Officer Salary($/Year): 124,971.93 Civilian PCS Costs ($): 35,496.00 Enlisted Salary($/Year): 82,399.09 Home Sale Reimburse Rate: 10.00% Civilian Salary($/Year): 59,959.18 Max Home Sale Reimburs($): 50,000.00 Avg Unemploy Cost($/Week): 272.90 Home Purch Reimburse Rate: 5.00% Unemployment Eligibility(Weeks): 16 Max Home Purch Reimburs($): 25,000.00 Civilians Not Willing To Move: 6.00% Civilian Homeowning Rate: 68.40% Civilian Turnover Rate: 9.16% HAP Home Value Reimburse Rate: 13.46% Civilian Early Retire Rate: 8.10% HAP Homeowner Receiving Rate: 18.44% Civilian Regular Retire Rate: 1.67% RSE Home Value Reimburse Rate: 0.00% Civilian RIF Pay Factor: 86.32% RSE Homeowner Receiving Rate: 0.00% Civ Early Retire Pay Factor: 18.03% STANDARD FACTORS SCREEN TWO - FACILITIES Army Navy Air Force Marines ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Service Sustainment Rate 87.00% 93.00% 92.00% 97.00% Unit Cost Adjustment (BOS) 10332.00 8879.00 3032.00 3904.00 Program Management Factor: 10.00 MilCon Site Prep Cost ($/SF): 0.74 Mothball (Close) ($/SF): 0.18 MilCon Contingency Plan Rate: 5.00% Mothball (Deac/Realn) ($/SF): 0.45 MilCon Design Rate (Medical): 13.00% Rehab vs. MilCon (Default): 47.00% MilCon Design Rate (Other): 9.00% Rehab vs. MilCon (Red): 64.00% MilCon SIOH Rate: 6.00% Rehab vs. MilCon (Amber): 29.00% Discount Rate for NPV/Payback: 2.80% STANDARD FACTORS SCREEN THREE - TRANSPORTATION Material/Assigned Mil (Lb): 710 Storage-In-Transit ($/Pers): 373.76 HHG Per Off Accomp (Lb): 15,290.00 POV Reimburse($/Mile): 0.20 HHG Per Enl Accomp (Lb): 9,204.00 Air Transport ($/Pass Mile): 0.20 HHG Per Off Unaccomp (Lb): 13,712.00 IT Connect ($/Person): 200.00 HHG Per Enl Unaccomp (Lb): 6,960.00 Misc Exp($/Direct Employee): 1,000.00 HHG Per Civilian (Lb): 18,000.00 Avg Mil Tour Length (Months): 30.02 Total HHG Cost ($/100Lb): 8.78 One-Time Off PCS Cost($): 10,477.58 Equip Pack & Crate($/Ton): 180.67 One-Time Enl PCS Cost($): 3,998.52
Deliberate Document - For Discussion Purpose Only - Do Not release Under FOIA
Deliberate Document - For Discussion Purpose Only - Do Not release Under FOIA USA-0046Rv2 DS School Consolidation to Ft. Jackson.doc Page 26 of 45
COBRA INPUT DATA REPORT (COBRA v6.10) - Page 7 Data As Of 04/26/2005 1:53:21 PM, Report Created 05/10/2005 3:59:01 PM Department : Army Scenario File : J:\RECOMMENDATION DEVELOPMENT\REVIEW FINAL\Completed\Sent to OSD\USA-0046Rv2 DS School Consolidation to Ft. Jackson\DS Consolidation (JAX) 04-13-51.CBR Option Pkg Name: Drill Sergeant Consolidation (Jackson) Std Fctrs File : D:\Army COBRA 6.10\BRAC2005.SFF FOOTNOTES FOR SCREEN ONE ======================== 1. Proposal # 40: Consolidate the DS School at Ft. Jackson. This proposal realigns Benning and Leonard Wood. 2. This proposal includes BPR personnel reductions resulting from consolidations and BASOPS adjustments in the population realignments at the installations above. FOOTNOTES FOR SCREEN THREE ========================== Data Call: 1. What military light vehicles, support equipment, and military and heavy vehicles must be retained and transferred to a gaining installation? FOOTNOTES FOR SCREEN FIVE ========================= 1. The one - time unique costs associated with this move is a result increases to core and community utility suport facilities at Ft. Jackson, $2,772,023 spread opver a two year period. 2. The one time IT cost reflects an increase of personnel at Ft Jackson 1,214. Increasing the total personnel from 25,142 to 26,356. 3. MILCON begins 1 year prior to personnel moves. FOOTNOTES FOR SCREEN SIX ======================== The personnel numbers are from the Stationable packages, which are based on ASIP. FOOTNOTES FOR SCREEN SEVEN ========================== tHE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL MOVING TO FT. JACKSON (33) WILL NOT GENERATE A RCI REQUIREMENT.
Deliberate Document - For Discussion Purpose Only - Do Not release Under FOIA
Deliberate Document - For Discussion Purpose Only - Do Not release Under FOIA USA-0046Rv2 DS School Consolidation to Ft. Jackson.doc Page 27 of 45
TOTAL COBRA MILITARY CONSTRUCTION ASSETS REPORT (COBRA v6.10) Data As Of 04/26/2005 1:53:21 PM, Report Created 05/10/2005 3:59:03 PM Department : Army Scenario File : J:\RECOMMENDATION DEVELOPMENT\REVIEW FINAL\Completed\Sent to OSD\USA-0046Rv2 DS School Consolidation to Ft. Jackson\DS Consolidation (JAX) 04-13-51.CBR Option Pkg Name: Drill Sergeant Consolidation (Jackson) Std Fctrs File : D:\Army COBRA 6.10\BRAC2005.SFF All values in 2005 Constant Dollars Total Milcon Cost Total Base Name MilCon* Avoidence Net Costs --------- ------- ----------- --------- BENNING 0 0 0 LEONARD WOOD 0 0 0 JACKSON 599,919 0 599,919 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Totals: 599,919 0 599,919 * All MilCon Costs include Design, Site Preparation, Contingency Planning, and SIOH Costs where applicable.
Deliberate Document - For Discussion Purpose Only - Do Not release Under FOIA
Deliberate Document - For Discussion Purpose Only - Do Not release Under FOIA USA-0046Rv2 DS School Consolidation to Ft. Jackson.doc Page 28 of 45
COBRA MILITARY CONSTRUCTION ASSETS REPORT (COBRA v6.10) - Page 2 Data As Of 04/26/2005 1:53:21 PM, Report Created 05/10/2005 3:59:03 PM Department : Army Scenario File : J:\RECOMMENDATION DEVELOPMENT\REVIEW FINAL\Completed\Sent to OSD\USA-0046Rv2 DS School Consolidation to Ft. Jackson\DS Consolidation (JAX) 04-13-51.CBR Option Pkg Name: Drill Sergeant Consolidation (Jackson) Std Fctrs File : D:\Army COBRA 6.10\BRAC2005.SFF MilCon for Base: JACKSON, SC (45404) All values in 2005 Constant Dollars ($K) New New Using Rehab Rehab Total FAC Title UM MilCon Cost* Rehab Type Cost* Cost* ---- ----------------------------------------- --- ------ ----- ----- ------- ----- ----- 8521 Vehicle Parking, Surfaced SY 13,000 600 0 Default 0 600 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total Construction Cost: 600 - Construction Cost Avoid: 0 ---------------------------------------- Total Net Milcon Cost: 600 * All MilCon Costs include Design, Site Preparation, Contingency Planning, and SIOH Costs where applicable.
Deliberate Document - For Discussion Purpose Only - Do Not release Under FOIA
Deliberate Document - For Discussion Purpose Only - Do Not release Under FOIA USA-0046Rv2 DS School Consolidation to Ft. Jackson.doc Page 29 of 45
Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only - Do Not Release Under FOIAPage 3
As of: Tue Apr 19 14:13:51 EDT 2005ECONOMIC IMPACT DATA
Scenario: All Selected (see title page)Economic Region of Influence(ROI): Columbus, GA-AL Metropolitan Statistical AreaBase: All BasesAction: All Actions
Overall Economic Impact of Proposed BRAC-05 Action:ROI Population (2002): 286,114ROI Employment (2002): 163,565Authorized Manpower (2005): 30,196Authorized Manpower(2005) / ROI Employment(2002): 18.46%Total Estimated Job Change: -254Total Estimated Job Change / ROI Employment(2002): -0.16%
Cumulative Job Change (Gain/Loss) Over Time:
Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only - Do Not Release Under FOIAPage 4
Columbus, GA-AL Metropolitan Statistical Area Trend Data
Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only - Do Not Release Under FOIAPage 5
As of: Tue Apr 19 14:13:51 EDT 2005ECONOMIC IMPACT DATA
Scenario: All Selected (see title page)Economic Region of Influence(ROI): Fort Leonard Wood, MO Micropolitan Statistical AreaBase: All BasesAction: All Actions
Overall Economic Impact of Proposed BRAC-05 Action:ROI Population (2002): 44,063ROI Employment (2002): 25,515Authorized Manpower (2005): 26,953Authorized Manpower(2005) / ROI Employment(2002): 105.64%Total Estimated Job Change: -159Total Estimated Job Change / ROI Employment(2002): -0.62%
Cumulative Job Change (Gain/Loss) Over Time:
Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only - Do Not Release Under FOIAPage 6
Fort Leonard Wood, MO Micropolitan Statistical Area Trend Data
Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only - Do Not Release Under FOIAPage 3
As of: Tue May 10 16:37:39 EDT 2005ECONOMIC IMPACT DATA
Scenario: All Selected (see title page)Economic Region of Influence(ROI): Columbus, GA-AL Metropolitan Statistical AreaBase: All BasesAction: All Actions
Overall Economic Impact of Proposed BRAC-05 Action:ROI Population (2002): 286,114ROI Employment (2002): 163,565Authorized Manpower (2005): 30,196Authorized Manpower(2005) / ROI Employment(2002): 18.46%Total Estimated Job Change: -171Total Estimated Job Change / ROI Employment(2002): -0.1%
Cumulative Job Change (Gain/Loss) Over Time:
Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only - Do Not Release Under FOIAPage 4
Columbus, GA-AL Metropolitan Statistical Area Trend Data
Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only - Do Not Release Under FOIAPage 5
As of: Tue May 10 16:37:39 EDT 2005ECONOMIC IMPACT DATA
Scenario: All Selected (see title page)Economic Region of Influence(ROI): Fort Leonard Wood, MO Micropolitan Statistical AreaBase: All BasesAction: All Actions
Overall Economic Impact of Proposed BRAC-05 Action:ROI Population (2002): 44,063ROI Employment (2002): 25,515Authorized Manpower (2005): 26,953Authorized Manpower(2005) / ROI Employment(2002): 105.64%Total Estimated Job Change: -237Total Estimated Job Change / ROI Employment(2002): -0.93%
Cumulative Job Change (Gain/Loss) Over Time:
Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only - Do Not Release Under FOIAPage 6
Fort Leonard Wood, MO Micropolitan Statistical Area Trend Data
Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only - Do Not Release Under FOIAPage 7
Losing Installation Gaining InstallationAttribute FORT BENNING FORT JACKSON
Child Care 1 1 SUSTAINHousing 3 3 SUSTAINCost of Living 3 2 IMPROVEEducation 1 2 DECLINEEmployment 2 1 IMPROVEMedical Health 3 2 IMPROVESafety 3 3 SUSTAINPopulation Center 1 1 SUSTAINTransportation 1 2 DECLINEUtilities 1 1 SUSTAIN
LOWRisk Evaluation
Attribute Change
CRITERIA SEVEN EVALUATION TOOL
04/18/2005 7:55 AM JPAT Seven.xls Front Page Page 1
04/18/2005 7:55 AM JPAT Seven.xls Front Page Page 2
04/18/2005 7:55 AM JPAT Seven.xls Front Page Page 3
ABERDEEN PROVING GROUNDSANNISTON ARMY DEPOTARMY JAG AGENCYARMY JAG SCHOOLBAILEY'S CROSS-ROADSBALLSTON COMPLEXBLUE GRASS ARMY DEPOTCARLISLE BARRACKSCHARLES E. KELLY SUPPORT FACILITYCORPUS CHRISTI ARMY DEPOTCRANE ARMY AMMUNITION ACTIVITYCRYTSAL CITY COMPLEXDESERET CHEMICAL DEPOTDETROIT ARSENALDUGWAY PROVING GROUNDFORT AP HILLFORT BELVOIRFORT BENNINGFORT BLISSFORT BRAGGFORT BUCHANANFORT CAMPBELLFORT CARSONFORT DETRICKFORT DIXFORT DRUMFORT EUSTISFORT GILLEMFORT GORDONFORT HAMILTONFORT HOODFORT HUACHUCAFORT IRWIN AND NTCFORT JACKSONFORT KNOX
04/18/2005 7:55 AM JPAT Seven.xls Front Page Page 4
FORT LEAVENWORTHFORT LEEFORT LEONARD WOODFORT LEWISFORT MCCOYFORT MCNAIRFORT MCPHERSONFORT MEADEFORT MONMOUTHFORT MONROEFORT MYERFORT POLKFORT RICHARDSONFORT RILEYFORT RUCKERFORT SAM HOUSTONFORT SHAFTERFORT SILLFORT STEWART/HAAFFORT WAINWRIGHTHAWTHORNE ARMY DEPOTHOFFMAN COMPLEXHOLSTON ARMY AMMUNITION PLANTHQ, ARMY ATECHQ, ARPERCENIOWA ARMY AMMUNITION PLANTKANSAS ARMY AMMUNITION PLANTLAKE CITY ARMY AMMUNITION PLANTLETTERKENNY ARMY DEPOTLIMA ARMY TANK PLANTLONE STAR ARMY AMMUNITION PLANTLOUISIANNA AAPMCALESTER ARMY AMMUNITION PLANTMILAN ARMY AMMUNITION PLANTMILITARY OCEAN TERMINAL SUNNY POINTMISSISSIPPI ARMY AMMUNITION PLANTNEWPORT CHEMICAL DEPOTPEO STRICOMPICATINNY ARSENALPINE BLUFF ARSENAL
04/18/2005 7:55 AM JPAT Seven.xls Front Page Page 5
PRESIDIO OF MONTEREYPUEBLO CHEMICAL DEPOTRADFORD ARMY AMMUNITION PLANTRED RIVER ARMY DEPOTREDSTONE ARSENALRIVERBANK ARMY AMMUNITION PLANTROCK ISLAND ARSENALROSSLYN COMPLEXSCHOFIELD BARRACKSSCRANTON ARMY AMMUNITION PLANTSIERRA ARMY DEPOTSOLDIER SYSTEMS CENTERTOBYHANNA ARMY DEPOTTOOELE ARMY DEPOTTRIPLER ARMY MEDICAL CENTERUMATILLA CHEMICAL DEPOTUS ARMY GARRISON SELFRIDGEUSA ADELPHI LABORATORY CENTERWALTER REED ARMY MEDICAL CENTERWATERVLIET ARSENALWEST POINT MILITARY RESERVATIONWHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGEYUMA PROVING GROUND
04/18/2005 7:55 AM JPAT Seven.xls Front Page Page 6
DRAFT DELIBERATIVE DOCUMENT - FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY - NOT RELEASABLE UNDER FOIA This document may contain information protected from disclosure by public law, regulations or orders.
Extracted from OSD BRAC database as of Jan 10, 2005
92
FORT JACKSON, SC Demographics The following tables provide a short description of the area near the installation/activity. FORT JACKSON is within Columbia, SC, the nearest city with a population of 100,000 or more. The nearest metropolitan statistical area (MSA) is MSA Population Columbia MSA 536,691 The following entities comprise the military housing area (MHA): County/City Population Fairfield 23454 Kershaw 52647 Lexington 216014 Newberry 36108 Orangeburg 91582 Richland 320677
Total 740,482
Child Care This attribute captures the number of nationally accredited child-care centers within the local community: 10
Cost of Living Cost of Living provides a relative measure of cost of living in the local community. General Schedule (GS) Locality Pay provides a relative scale to compare local salaries with government salaries and Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) is an indicator of the local rental market. In-state tuition is an indicator of the support provided by the state for active duty family members to participate in higher-level education opportunities.
Median Household Income (US Avg $41,994) $41,677 Median House Value (US Avg $119,600) $101,800
Basis: MSA
GS Locality Pay (“Rest of US” 10.9%) 10.9% O-3 with Dependents BAH Rate $1,080 In-state Tuition for Family Member Yes In-state Tuition Continues if Member PCSs Out of State No
Education This attribute defines the population in local school districts and identifies capacity. The pupil/teacher ratio, graduation rate, percentage of certified teachers and composite SAT I/ACT scores provide a relative quality indicator of education. This attribute also attempts to give communities credit for the potential intellectual capital they provide.
DRAFT DELIBERATIVE DOCUMENT - FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY - NOT RELEASABLE UNDER FOIA This document may contain information protected from disclosure by public law, regulations or orders.
Extracted from OSD BRAC database as of Jan 10, 2005
93
NOTE: “MFR” means a Memorandum For Record is on file at the installation/activity/agency to document problems in obtaining the required information. Reasons for not being able to obtain information may be that the school district refused to provide the information or the school district does not use or track the information. If the installation/activity/agency has incomplete information from the local school system in order to accurately compute a score in this area, the number of school districts reporting information will be captured in addition to the computed answer.
Basis
School District(s) Capacity 48,374 2 of 2 districts
Students Enrolled 44,030 2 of 2 districts
Average Pupil/Teacher Ratio 19.4:1 2 of 2 districts
High School Students Enrolled 44,030 2 of 2 districts
Average High School Graduation Rate (US Avg 67.3%) 77.1% 2 of 2 districts
Average Composite SAT I Score (US Avg 1026) 1003 2 of 2 districts
Average ACT Score (US Avg 20.8) 19 2 of 2 districts
Available Graduate/PhD Programs 3 Available Colleges and/or Universities 8 Available Vocational and/or Technical Schools 3
Employment Unemployment and job growth rates provide a relative merit of job availability in the local community. National rates from the Bureau of Labor Statistics are also provided. The unemployment rates for the last five-years: 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Local Data 2.4% 2.5% 3.1% 3.5% 4.1% National 4.2% 4.0% 4.7% 5.8% 6.0% Basis: MSA MSA MSA MSA MSA
The annual job growth rate for the last five-years: 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Local Data .3% -1.5% -3.5% 4.3% 1.3% National 1.5% 2.4% .03% -.31% .86% Basis: MSA MSA MSA MSA MSA
Housing This attribute provides an indication of availability of housing, both sales and rental, in the local community. Note: according to the 2000 Census, Vacant Sale and Vacant Rental Units do not equal Total Vacant Housing Units; Total Vacant Housing Units may also include units that are vacant but not on the market for sale or rent.
DRAFT DELIBERATIVE DOCUMENT - FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY - NOT RELEASABLE UNDER FOIA This document may contain information protected from disclosure by public law, regulations or orders.
Extracted from OSD BRAC database as of Jan 10, 2005
94
Total Vacant Housing Units 17,430 Vacant Sale Units 3,415 Vacant Rental Units 7,128
Basis: MSA
Medical Providers This attribute provides an indicator of availability of medical care for military and DoD civilians in the local community. The table reflects the raw number of physicians/beds and ratio of physicians/beds to population.
# Physicians # Beds Population Local Community 1,499 1,506 536,691 Ratio 1:358 1:356
Basis: MSA
National Ratio (2003) 1:421.2 1:373.7
Safety/Crime The local community’s Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) Index for 2002 per 100,000 people and the national UCR based on information from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) for 2002:
Local UCR 5,959.0 Basis: MSA National UCR 4,118.8
Transportation Distance to an airport shows convenience and availability of airline transportation. Public transportation shows potential for members and DoD civilians to use it to commute to/from work under normal circumstances and for leisure. Distance from FORT JACKSON to nearest commercial airport: 16.2 miles Is FORT JACKSON served by regularly scheduled public transportation? Yes
Utilities This attribute identifies a local community’s water and sewer systems’ ability to receive 1,000 additional people. Does the local community’s water system have the ability to meet an expanded need of an additional 1,000 people moving in the local community? Yes Does the local community’s sewer system have the ability to meet an expanded need of an additional 1,000 people moving in the local community? Yes
DRAFT DELIBERATIVE DOCUMENT - FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY - NOT RELEASABLE UNDER FOIA This document may contain information protected from disclosure by public law, regulations or orders.
Extracted from OSD BRAC database as of Jan 10, 2005
104
FORT LEONARD WOOD, MO Demographics The following tables provide a short description of the area near the installation/activity. FORT LEONARD WOOD is 93.8 miles from Springfield, MO, the nearest city with a population of 100,000 or more. The nearest metropolitan statistical area (MSA) is MSA Population St Louis, MO MSA 2,603,607 The following entities comprise the military housing area (MHA): County/City Population Phelps 39825 Pulaski 41165 Texas 23003
Total 103,993
Child Care This attribute captures the number of nationally accredited child-care centers within the local community: 0
Cost of Living Cost of Living provides a relative measure of cost of living in the local community. General Schedule (GS) Locality Pay provides a relative scale to compare local salaries with government salaries and Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) is an indicator of the local rental market. In-state tuition is an indicator of the support provided by the state for active duty family members to participate in higher-level education opportunities.
Median Household Income (US Avg $41,994) $30,236 Median House Value (US Avg $119,600) $73,133
Basis: 3 of 3
counties GS Locality Pay (“Rest of US” 10.9%) 10.9% O-3 with Dependents BAH Rate $ 939 In-state Tuition for Family Member Yes In-state Tuition Continues if Member PCSs Out of State No
Education This attribute defines the population in local school districts and identifies capacity. The pupil/teacher ratio, graduation rate, percentage of certified teachers and composite SAT I/ACT scores provide a relative quality indicator of education. This attribute also attempts to give communities credit for the potential intellectual capital they provide. NOTE: “MFR” means a Memorandum For Record is on file at the installation/activity/agency to document problems in obtaining the required information. Reasons for not being able to obtain information may be that the school district refused to provide the information or the school district does not use or track the information.
DRAFT DELIBERATIVE DOCUMENT - FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY - NOT RELEASABLE UNDER FOIA This document may contain information protected from disclosure by public law, regulations or orders.
Extracted from OSD BRAC database as of Jan 10, 2005
105
If the installation/activity/agency has incomplete information from the local school system in order to accurately compute a score in this area, the number of school districts reporting information will be captured in addition to the computed answer.
Basis
School District(s) Capacity 1,618 5 of 5 districts
Students Enrolled 1,135 5 of 5 districts
Average Pupil/Teacher Ratio 12.5:1 5 of 5 districts
High School Students Enrolled 2,392 5 of 5 districts
Average High School Graduation Rate (US Avg 67.3%) 86.7% 5 of 5 districts
Average Composite SAT I Score (US Avg 1026)
Average ACT Score (US Avg 20.8) 22 5 of 5 districts
Available Graduate/PhD Programs 1 Available Colleges and/or Universities 0 Available Vocational and/or Technical Schools 0
Employment Unemployment and job growth rates provide a relative merit of job availability in the local community. National rates from the Bureau of Labor Statistics are also provided. The unemployment rates for the last five-years: 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Local Data 2.6% 4.9% 5.3% 5.0% 5.1% National 4.2% 4.0% 4.7% 5.8% 6.0% Basis: 3 of 3 counties 3 of 3 counties 3 of 3 counties 3 of 3 counties 3 of 3 counties
The annual job growth rate for the last five-years: 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Local Data - .2% 2.9% 3.7% 3.1% 2.2% National 1.5% 2.4% .03% -.31% .86% Basis: 3 of 3 counties 3 of 3 counties 3 of 3 counties 3 of 3 counties 3 of 3 counties
Housing This attribute provides an indication of availability of housing, both sales and rental, in the local community. Note: according to the 2000 Census, Vacant Sale and Vacant Rental Units do not equal Total Vacant Housing Units; Total Vacant Housing Units may also include units that are vacant but not on the market for sale or rent.
Total Vacant Housing Units 5,179 Vacant Sale Units 868
Basis: 3 of 3 counties
DRAFT DELIBERATIVE DOCUMENT - FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY - NOT RELEASABLE UNDER FOIA This document may contain information protected from disclosure by public law, regulations or orders.
Extracted from OSD BRAC database as of Jan 10, 2005
106
Vacant Rental Units 1,532
Medical Providers This attribute provides an indicator of availability of medical care for military and DoD civilians in the local community. The table reflects the raw number of physicians/beds and ratio of physicians/beds to population.
# Physicians # Beds Population Local Community 104 207 103,993 Ratio 1:1,000 1:502
Basis: 3 of 3 counties
National Ratio (2003) 1:421.2 1:373.7
Safety/Crime The local community’s Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) Index for 2002 per 100,000 people and the national UCR based on information from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) for 2002:
Local UCR 3,147.1 Basis: 3 of 3 counties National UCR 4,118.8
Transportation Distance to an airport shows convenience and availability of airline transportation. Public transportation shows potential for members and DoD civilians to use it to commute to/from work under normal circumstances and for leisure. Distance from FORT LEONARD WOOD to nearest commercial airport: 4.0 miles Is FORT LEONARD WOOD served by regularly scheduled public transportation? Yes
Utilities This attribute identifies a local community’s water and sewer systems’ ability to receive 1,000 additional people. Does the local community’s water system have the ability to meet an expanded need of an additional 1,000 people moving in the local community? Yes Does the local community’s sewer system have the ability to meet an expanded need of an additional 1,000 people moving in the local community? Yes
DRAFT DELIBERATIVE DOCUMENT - FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY - NOT RELEASABLE UNDER FOIA This document may contain information protected from disclosure by public law, regulations or orders.
Extracted from OSD BRAC database as of Jan 10, 2005
47
FORT BENNING, GA Demographics The following tables provide a short description of the area near the installation/activity. FORT BENNING is within Columbus, GA, the nearest city with a population of 100,000 or more. The nearest metropolitan statistical area (MSA) is MSA Population COLUMBUS MSA 274,624 The following entities comprise the military housing area (MHA): County/City Population Chattahoochee 14882 Harris 23695 Muscogee 186291 Russell 49756
Total 274,624
Child Care This attribute captures the number of nationally accredited child-care centers within the local community: 4
Cost of Living Cost of Living provides a relative measure of cost of living in the local community. General Schedule (GS) Locality Pay provides a relative scale to compare local salaries with government salaries and Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) is an indicator of the local rental market. In-state tuition is an indicator of the support provided by the state for active duty family members to participate in higher-level education opportunities.
Median Household Income (US Avg $41,994) $34,512 Median House Value (US Avg $119,600) $84,000
Basis: MSA
GS Locality Pay (“Rest of US” 10.9%) 13.1% O-3 with Dependents BAH Rate $1,152 In-state Tuition for Family Member Yes In-state Tuition Continues if Member PCSs Out of State Yes
Education This attribute defines the population in local school districts and identifies capacity. The pupil/teacher ratio, graduation rate, percentage of certified teachers and composite SAT I/ACT scores provide a relative quality indicator of education. This attribute also attempts to give communities credit for the potential intellectual capital they provide.
DRAFT DELIBERATIVE DOCUMENT - FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY - NOT RELEASABLE UNDER FOIA This document may contain information protected from disclosure by public law, regulations or orders.
Extracted from OSD BRAC database as of Jan 10, 2005
48
NOTE: “MFR” means a Memorandum For Record is on file at the installation/activity/agency to document problems in obtaining the required information. Reasons for not being able to obtain information may be that the school district refused to provide the information or the school district does not use or track the information. If the installation/activity/agency has incomplete information from the local school system in order to accurately compute a score in this area, the number of school districts reporting information will be captured in addition to the computed answer.
Basis
School District(s) Capacity 51,775 5 of 5 districts
Students Enrolled 48,317 5 of 5 districts
Average Pupil/Teacher Ratio 14.7:1 5 of 5 districts
High School Students Enrolled 15,908 5 of 5 districts
Average High School Graduation Rate (US Avg 67.3%) 71.0% 5 of 5 districts
Average Composite SAT I Score (US Avg 1026) 616 2 of 5 districts
Average ACT Score (US Avg 20.8) 18 5 of 5 districts
Available Graduate/PhD Programs 6 Available Colleges and/or Universities 10 Available Vocational and/or Technical Schools 2
Employment Unemployment and job growth rates provide a relative merit of job availability in the local community. National rates from the Bureau of Labor Statistics are also provided. The unemployment rates for the last five-years: 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Local Data 5.1% 4.7% 4.8% 5.5% 5.4% National 4.2% 4.0% 4.7% 5.8% 6.0% Basis: MSA MSA MSA MSA MSA
The annual job growth rate for the last five-years: 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Local Data .6% .6% -3.0% .2% 3.9% National 1.5% 2.4% .03% -.31% .86% Basis: MSA MSA MSA MSA MSA
Housing This attribute provides an indication of availability of housing, both sales and rental, in the local community. Note: according to the 2000 Census, Vacant Sale and Vacant Rental Units do not equal Total Vacant Housing Units; Total Vacant Housing Units may also include units that are vacant but not on the market for sale or rent.
DRAFT DELIBERATIVE DOCUMENT - FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY - NOT RELEASABLE UNDER FOIA This document may contain information protected from disclosure by public law, regulations or orders.
Extracted from OSD BRAC database as of Jan 10, 2005
49
Total Vacant Housing Units 11,303 Vacant Sale Units 1,662 Vacant Rental Units 5,200
Basis: MSA
Medical Providers This attribute provides an indicator of availability of medical care for military and DoD civilians in the local community. The table reflects the raw number of physicians/beds and ratio of physicians/beds to population.
# Physicians # Beds Population Local Community 796 1,162 274,624 Ratio 1:345 1:236
Basis: MSA
National Ratio (2003) 1:421.2 1:373.7
Safety/Crime The local community’s Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) Index for 2002 per 100,000 people and the national UCR based on information from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) for 2002:
Local UCR 5,042.0 Basis: MSA National UCR 4,118.8
Transportation Distance to an airport shows convenience and availability of airline transportation. Public transportation shows potential for members and DoD civilians to use it to commute to/from work under normal circumstances and for leisure. Distance from FORT BENNING to nearest commercial airport: 10.8 miles Is FORT BENNING served by regularly scheduled public transportation? Yes
Utilities This attribute identifies a local community’s water and sewer systems’ ability to receive 1,000 additional people. Does the local community’s water system have the ability to meet an expanded need of an additional 1,000 people moving in the local community? Yes Does the local community’s sewer system have the ability to meet an expanded need of an additional 1,000 people moving in the local community? Yes
Losing Installation Gaining InstallationAttribute FORT LEONARD WOOD FORT JACKSON
Child Care 2 1 IMPROVEHousing 3 3 SUSTAINCost of Living 2 2 SUSTAINEducation 2 2 SUSTAINEmployment 2 1 IMPROVEMedical Health 3 2 IMPROVESafety 1 3 DECLINEPopulation Center 3 1 IMPROVETransportation 1 2 DECLINEUtilities 1 1 SUSTAIN
04/18/2005 7:57 AM JPAT Seven.xls Front Page Page 1
04/18/2005 7:57 AM JPAT Seven.xls Front Page Page 2
04/18/2005 7:57 AM JPAT Seven.xls Front Page Page 3
ABERDEEN PROVING GROUNDSANNISTON ARMY DEPOTARMY JAG AGENCYARMY JAG SCHOOLBAILEY'S CROSS-ROADSBALLSTON COMPLEXBLUE GRASS ARMY DEPOTCARLISLE BARRACKSCHARLES E. KELLY SUPPORT FACILITYCORPUS CHRISTI ARMY DEPOTCRANE ARMY AMMUNITION ACTIVITYCRYTSAL CITY COMPLEXDESERET CHEMICAL DEPOTDETROIT ARSENALDUGWAY PROVING GROUNDFORT AP HILLFORT BELVOIRFORT BENNINGFORT BLISSFORT BRAGGFORT BUCHANANFORT CAMPBELLFORT CARSONFORT DETRICKFORT DIXFORT DRUMFORT EUSTISFORT GILLEMFORT GORDONFORT HAMILTONFORT HOODFORT HUACHUCAFORT IRWIN AND NTCFORT JACKSONFORT KNOX
04/18/2005 7:57 AM JPAT Seven.xls Front Page Page 4
FORT LEAVENWORTHFORT LEEFORT LEONARD WOODFORT LEWISFORT MCCOYFORT MCNAIRFORT MCPHERSONFORT MEADEFORT MONMOUTHFORT MONROEFORT MYERFORT POLKFORT RICHARDSONFORT RILEYFORT RUCKERFORT SAM HOUSTONFORT SHAFTERFORT SILLFORT STEWART/HAAFFORT WAINWRIGHTHAWTHORNE ARMY DEPOTHOFFMAN COMPLEXHOLSTON ARMY AMMUNITION PLANTHQ, ARMY ATECHQ, ARPERCENIOWA ARMY AMMUNITION PLANTKANSAS ARMY AMMUNITION PLANTLAKE CITY ARMY AMMUNITION PLANTLETTERKENNY ARMY DEPOTLIMA ARMY TANK PLANTLONE STAR ARMY AMMUNITION PLANTLOUISIANNA AAPMCALESTER ARMY AMMUNITION PLANTMILAN ARMY AMMUNITION PLANTMILITARY OCEAN TERMINAL SUNNY POINTMISSISSIPPI ARMY AMMUNITION PLANTNEWPORT CHEMICAL DEPOTPEO STRICOMPICATINNY ARSENALPINE BLUFF ARSENAL
04/18/2005 7:57 AM JPAT Seven.xls Front Page Page 5
PRESIDIO OF MONTEREYPUEBLO CHEMICAL DEPOTRADFORD ARMY AMMUNITION PLANTRED RIVER ARMY DEPOTREDSTONE ARSENALRIVERBANK ARMY AMMUNITION PLANTROCK ISLAND ARSENALROSSLYN COMPLEXSCHOFIELD BARRACKSSCRANTON ARMY AMMUNITION PLANTSIERRA ARMY DEPOTSOLDIER SYSTEMS CENTERTOBYHANNA ARMY DEPOTTOOELE ARMY DEPOTTRIPLER ARMY MEDICAL CENTERUMATILLA CHEMICAL DEPOTUS ARMY GARRISON SELFRIDGEUSA ADELPHI LABORATORY CENTERWALTER REED ARMY MEDICAL CENTERWATERVLIET ARSENALWEST POINT MILITARY RESERVATIONWHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGEYUMA PROVING GROUND
04/18/2005 7:57 AM JPAT Seven.xls Front Page Page 6
Draft Deliberative Document-For Discussion Purposes Only-Do Not Release Under FOIA Page 1 of 5
SUMMARY OF SCENARIO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS [TABS FINAL VERSION] SCENARIO # 40 TITLE: USA-0046 DRILL SGT SCHOOL CONSOLIDATION AT FT. JACKSON GENERAL DESCRIPTION: This recommendation, in conjunction with the Realign Fort Leonard Wood (Drill Sergeant School to Fort Jackson) recommendation, consolidates Drill Sergeant’s Training from three locations Fort Benning, Fort Jackson, & Fort Leonard Wood to one location, Fort Jackson. Proposal affects the following Army installations: 1. Ft Jackson gains approximately 300 personnel and requires no new MilCon. 2. Ft Benning loses approximately 200 personnel. 3. Ft Leonard Wood loses approximately 100 personnel. ANALYST: COL CRABTREE LAST UPDATE: 04/14/05
Env Resource Area
Gaining Installation Assessment Inst Name: Ft Jackson
Analyst Comments (& data source(s) that drive assessment)
Air
Qua
lity
Ft Jackson is currently in Non-Attainment area for Ozone. Added operations will require New Source Review permitting and Air Conformity Analysis.
#213,214,219 – Non-Attainment for O3 (8hr) #211 No permit or major source thresholds projected to be exceeded based on 1% increase at Ft Jackson. #212-No exceedences reported #220 Major operating permit ISR2 - No impact to mission.
Cul
tura
l/Arc
heol
ogic
al/T
ribal
R
esou
rces
92 cultural/archeological/historical properties/sites listed with restrictions on training and digging. 2 historical properties listed. 14 Native American tribes assert an interest in archeological sites. Cultural / archeological / tribal resources currently restrict operations. Additional operations may impact these resources and result in further restrictions on training or operations. A potential impact may occur as a result of increased time delays and negotiated restrictions. Potential impacts may occur, since resources must be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.
#230-232 - 92+ arch resource sites, with training/digging restrictions #233 - 99% surveyed; #234 - 14 tribes assert interest; in formal consultations #235 - 2 historic properties listed #236 - No programmatic agreement ISR2 No impact to mission.
Dr
ed g- ing No impact. #226, 227, 228 – N/A
Land
Use
C
onst
rain
ts/
Sens
itiv
e Res
ourc
e A
reas
No impact. #30 - Buildable Acres – 0 acres req'd, with 32,000 acres available #201,254,256 - No constraints. CERL Study – moderate encroachment projected
Mar
ine
Ma
mm
als/
Mar
ine No impact. #248-253 – No restrictions
Noi
se No impact #239 - No noise zone acreage reported off-
installation.
Draft Deliberative Document-For Discussion Purposes Only-Do Not Release Under FOIA Page 2 of 5
Thre
aten
ed&
En
dang
ered
Sp
ecie
s/C
ritic
al
Hab
itat
TES on installation include Red-cockaded Woodpecker, and Smooth Coneflower, with restrictions on land based training and digging of deliberate fighting positions. Additional operations may further impact threatened / endangered species leading to additional restrictions on training or operations.
#259 - TES include Red-cockaded Woodpecker, and Smooth Coneflower; smooth coneflower restricts land based training on <1% of land. #261- BO for Red Cockaded woodpecker indicates no digging of deliberate fighting positions within 200 ft of species. . #260,262-264 - No candidate species/habitat ISR2 - no impact.
Was
te
Man
age
men
t
No impact. #269 No RCRA Subpart X Permit - but none needed. #265-Has hazardous waste TSDF #272-No SWDF
Wat
er R
esou
rces
No impact. #276,278,279,293 - No restrictions #282 - No industrial ww plant #291 – Has 9 potable water production plants on-installation, and 1 off-installation (public owned) plant. #297,822 – 2 domestic ww treatment plants on installation ISR2 - no impacts IREM shows water infr can support 72,756 more people.
Wet
land
s No impact. Wetlands already restrict operations. Additional operations may impact wetlands, which may lead to operations that are restricted.
#251 – survey 05/1996 #257 - 7% of range, 10% of installation has wetlands – restrictions reported (no filling permitted)
Draft Deliberative Document-For Discussion Purposes Only-Do Not Release Under FOIA Page 3 of 5
SUBJECT: SUMMARY OF SCENARIO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (CONTINUED); SCENARIO # 40
Env Resource Area
Losing Installation Assessment Inst Name: Ft Benning, Ft Leonard
Wood
Analyst Comments (& data source(s) that drive assessment)
Air
Qua
lity
No Impacts. Environmental impacts to losing installations are considered neutral or positive to all ten resource areas.
Cul
tura
l/A
rche
olo
gica
l/Trib
al
Res
ourc
es
No Impacts.
Dre
dgi
ng No Impacts.
Land
Use
C
onst
rai
nts/
Sens
itiv
e R
esou
rce
Are
as No Impacts.
Mar
ine M
amm
als/
Mar
ine R
eso No Impacts.
Noi
se
No Impacts.
Thre
aten
ed&
En
dang
ered
Sp
ecie
s/C
ritic
al
Hab
itat
No Impacts.
Was
te
Man
agem
ent
No Impacts.
Wat
er
Res
ourc
es
No Impacts.
Wet
land
s
No Impacts.
Draft Deliberative Document-For Discussion Purposes Only-Do Not Release Under FOIA Page 4 of 5
SUBJECT: SUMMARY OF SCENARIO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (CONTINUED); SCENARIO # 40
IMPACTS OF COSTS
Env Resource
Area
Gaining Installation Inst Name: Ft Jackson
Losing Installation Inst Name: Ft Benning, Ft Leonard Wood
Envi
ronm
enta
l R
esto
ratio
n*
None. N/A. These installations are losing personnel, but not closing.
Air Conformity Analysis - $50K. New Source Review Analysis and permitting - $100K. NEPA (EA) - $100K.
N/A.
Draft Deliberative Document-For Discussion Purposes Only-Do Not Release Under FOIA Page 5 of 5
Environmental Impact
Fort Jackson This recommendation moves additional personnel but causes no new construction on Fort Jackson. Drill Sergeant training is predominantly classroom-based, so field training frequency and the amount of land impacted by field training, is not expected to increase significantly. Fort Jackson is located in a Non-attainment area for Ozone (8-hour). Therefore, an Air Conformity determination and New Source Review and permitting effort will be required. No adverse effects to any other environmental resource areas are expected. This recommendation will require spending approximately $250K for environmental compliance costs. These costs were included in the payback calculation. This recommendation does not otherwise impact the costs of environmental restoration, waste management, and environmental compliance activities. Fort Benning and Fort Leonard Wood These installations are losing personnel, but not closing, so no adverse impacts to any environmental resource areas are expected.
Draft Deliberative Document-For Discussion Purposes Only-Do Not Release Under FOIA Page 1 of 4
SUMMARY OF SCENARIO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS [TABS FINAL VERSION] SCENARIO # USA-0046 TITLE: USA-0046 SINGLE DRILL SERGEANT SCHOOL GENERAL DESCRIPTION: This recommendation consolidates Drill Sergeant’s Training from three locations Fort Benning, Fort Jackson, & Fort Leonard Wood to one location, Fort Jackson. Proposal affects the following Army installations: 1. Ft Jackson gains approximately 300 personnel and requires no new MilCon. 2. Ft Benning loses approximately 200 personnel. 3. Ft Leonard Wood loses approximately 100 personnel. ANALYST: LAST UPDATE: 04/14/05
Env Resource Area
Gaining Installation Assessment Inst Name: Ft Jackson
Analyst Comments (& data source(s) that drive assessment)
Air
Qua
lity
Ft Jackson is currently in Non-Attainment area for Ozone. Added operations will require New Source Review permitting, Air Conformity Analysis and modifications to existing Title V permit.
#213,214,219 – Non-Attainment for O3 (8hr) #211 No permit or major source thresholds projected to be exceeded based on 1% increase at Ft Jackson. #212-No exceedences reported #220 Major operating permit ISR2 - No impact to mission.
Cul
tura
l/Arc
heol
ogic
al/T
ribal
R
esou
rces
92 cultural/archeological/historical properties/sites listed with restrictions on training and digging. 2 historical properties listed. 14 Native American tribes assert an interest in archeological sites. Cultural / archeological / tribal resources currently restrict operations. Additional operations may impact these resources and result in further restrictions on training or operations. A potential impact may occur as a result of increased time delays and negotiated restrictions. Potential impacts may occur, since resources must be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.
#230-232 - 92+ arch resource sites, with training/digging restrictions #233 - 99% surveyed; #234 - 14 tribes assert interest; in formal consultations #235 - 2 historic properties listed #236 - No programmatic agreement ISR2 No impact to mission.
Dr
ed g- ing No impact. #226, 227, 228 – N/A
Land
Use
C
onst
rain
ts/
Sens
itiv
e Res
ourc
e A
reas
No impact. #30 - Buildable Acres – 0 acres req'd, with 32,000 acres available #201,254,256 - No constraints. CERL Study – moderate encroachment projected
Mar
ine
Ma
mm
als/
Mar
ine No impact. #248-253 – No restrictions
Noi
se No impact #239 - No noise zone acreage reported off-
installation.
Draft Deliberative Document-For Discussion Purposes Only-Do Not Release Under FOIA Page 2 of 4
Thre
aten
ed&
En
dang
ered
Sp
ecie
s/C
ritic
al
Hab
itat
TES on installation include Red-cockaded Woodpecker, and Smooth Coneflower, with restrictions on land based training and digging of deliberate fighting positions. Additional operations may further impact threatened / endangered species leading to additional restrictions on training or operations.
#259 - TES include Red-cockaded Woodpecker, and Smooth Coneflower; smooth coneflower restricts land based training on <1% of land. #261- BO for Red Cockaded woodpecker indicates no digging of deliberate fighting positions within 200 ft of species. . #260,262-264 - No candidate species/habitat ISR2 - no impact.
Was
te
Man
age
men
t
No impact. #269 No RCRA Subpart X Permit - but none needed. #265-Has hazardous waste TSDF #272-No SWDF
Wat
er R
esou
rces
No impact. #276,278,279,293 - No restrictions #282 - No industrial ww plant #291 – Has 9 potable water production plants on-installation, and 1 off-installation (public owned) plant. #297,822 – 2 domestic ww treatment plants on installation ISR2 - no impacts IREM shows water infr can support 72,756 more people.
Wet
land
s No impact. Wetlands already restrict operations. Additional operations may impact wetlands, which may lead to operations that are restricted.
#251 – survey 05/1996 #257 - 7% of range, 10% of installation has wetlands – restrictions reported (no filling permitted)
Draft Deliberative Document-For Discussion Purposes Only-Do Not Release Under FOIA Page 3 of 4
SUBJECT: SUMMARY OF SCENARIO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (CONTINUED); SCENARIO # 40
Env Resource Area
Losing Installation Assessment Inst Name: Ft Benning, Ft Leonard
Wood
Analyst Comments (& data source(s) that drive assessment)
Air
Qua
lity
No Impacts. Environmental impacts to losing installations are considered neutral or positive to all ten resource areas.
Cul
tura
l/A
rche
olo
gica
l/Trib
al
Res
ourc
es
No Impacts.
Dre
dgi
ng No Impacts.
Land
Use
C
onst
rai
nts/
Sens
itiv
e R
esou
rce
Are
as No Impacts.
Mar
ine M
amm
als/
Mar
ine R
eso No Impacts.
Noi
se
No Impacts.
Thre
aten
ed&
En
dang
ered
Sp
ecie
s/C
ritic
al
Hab
itat
No Impacts.
Was
te
Man
agem
ent
No Impacts.
Wat
er
Res
ourc
es
No Impacts.
Wet
land
s
No Impacts.
Draft Deliberative Document-For Discussion Purposes Only-Do Not Release Under FOIA Page 4 of 4
SUBJECT: SUMMARY OF SCENARIO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (CONTINUED); SCENARIO # 40
IMPACTS OF COSTS
Env Resource
Area
Gaining Installation Inst Name: Ft Jackson
Losing Installation Inst Name: Ft Benning, Ft Leonard Wood
Envi
ronm
enta
l R
esto
ratio
n*
None. N/A. These installations are losing personnel, but not closing.