Silver Linings Playbook: Best Practices in Trademark Clearance & Selection Stephen Coates, Susan Natland & Jonathan Hyman ACCA Doubleheader, Disneyland, April 30, 2013
Silver Linings Playbook:
Best Practices in Trademark Clearance & Selection
Stephen Coates, Susan Natland & Jonathan Hyman
ACCA Doubleheader, Disneyland, April 30, 2013
2© 2013 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved.
Why Clear a Mark?
Goals:
• Manage risk
–Lower risk of a lawsuit, C & D or other objection
–Lower risk of having to rebrand
• Manage costs
– Will prosecution be costly?
– Is a third party objection likely?
3© 2013 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved.
Why Clear a mark?
** Duty to search before adopting a mark?
– No affirmative duty, but good business practice
– A search could rebut claim of willful infringement
Assess three areas:
1. Risk of conflict
2. Likelihood of registrability
3. Protectability/Scope of protection
4© 2013 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved.
Logos
Case Study: New Beer Launch
Two Versions
• SASQUATCH = 12 oz (normal size) bottle name• DWARF = 6 oz (small size) bottle name
5© 2013 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved.
Case Study: New Beer Launch
Bottle Shape/Ornamentation:- Mini bottle for the DWARF beer- Beer cap ornament for small
bottle- Foot design embossed on the
beer cap of large bottle
Slogan (large bottle): “THE MONSTER OF BEERS”
Slogan (small bottle):“SMALL SIZE…SAME BIG TASTE”
Flavors: ALASKAN JUNIPERCANADIAN MAPLE
6© 2013 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved.
New Beer Launch: Roll-Out Plans & Timing
12 Months to 18 MonthsRoll‐Out DWARF Beer in the U.S. and Abroad
3 to 6 MonthsRoll‐Out SASQUATCH Beer in the U.S.
6 Months to 12 MonthsRoll‐Out SASQUATCH Beer Abroad in AU, EU and CA
7© 2013 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved.
The Draft: Creating a Strong Brand?
Business and LEGAL Attributes of a Good Brand
• Appropriate • Credible • Appealing • Relevant• Memorable• Enduring• Easy to Pronounce
PROTECTABLE AVAILABLE
Business
Legal
8© 2013 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved.
ArbitraryFancifulSuggestiveDescriptiveGeneric
The Draft: Is the Brand Protectable?
BRAND STRENGTH CONTINUUM
The common name for a product
Merely describes a function,
characteristic, or purpose of the
product
Brings to mind a function, characteristic
or purpose of the product but in a
suggestive/creative way
A coined term or a word with no significance in relation to the goods or services with which it is
used
APPLE(apples)
RAISIN BRAN (cereal)BABY BRIE (brie cheese)
LE CROISSANT SHOP (café)
KODAK (film)APPLE (computers)
EXXON (oil)
COPPERTONE (suntan oil)CHICKEN OF THE SEA (tuna)
WHIRLPOOL (washers)
No Protection
InherentlyProtectable
Capable of Eventually Becoming Protectable
9© 2013 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved.
The Draft: Team Descriptive vs. Team Suggestive
Descriptive SuggestiveCHAP STICK (skin preparation stick) ORANGE CRUSH (orange drink)RAISIN-BRAN (raisin and bran cereal) BOILING CRAB (seafood restaurant)HOLIDAY INN (motel) 7-Eleven (food store chain)TWENTY FOUR HOUR FITNESS (gym)
L’EGGS women’s hosiery
WORLD BOOK (encyclopedia) ROACH MOTEL (insect trap)COMPUTERLAND (computer store) CITIBANK (urban bank)INTELLIGENT (vehicle tires) CHEW ‘N CLEAN (dentrifice)JOY (detergent) HULA HOOP (plastic hoops)
Good Rule of Thumb: The more creative or abstract, the more likely to be suggestive and not descriptive
10© 2013 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved.
The Draft – Not All Brands Are Created Equal
• Public policy behind descriptive marks/generic terms
– Competitors need ability to describe their products/services
• Risks of descriptive marks
– Competitors use same or similar terms to describe their products/services and dilute your marketing message
– Limited ability to enforce unless acquire secondary meaning
– Could spend more resources enforcing/protecting the mark than actually spend on branding
11© 2013 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved.
The Risks of Choosing a Descriptive or Weak Brand
Trademark Registration May Not Be Immediately Granted if the Mark is Descriptive• Must satisfy higher burden to Trademark Office (usually
requires showing 5 years of use in the U.S.; even harder in Europe)
• In the interim, someone else may begin using your brand
Scope of Protection May be Narrow if the Mark is Weak• If in a crowded field of similar marks• If the mark is borderline descriptive
12© 2013 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved.
The Draft
Where Do Your Proposed New Brands Fall?
Brands Fall?DWARF for beerSASQUATCH for beerCANADIAN MAPLE flavor of beerALASKAN JUNIPER flavor of beer
13© 2013 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved.
The Draft: Is the Brand Protectable?
ArbitraryFancifulSuggestiveDescriptiveGeneric
Avoid WE WANT THESE!!
No Protection
Capable of Eventually Becoming Protectable
InherentlyProtectable
DWARFSASQUATCHALASKAN JUNIPER
CANADIAN MAPLE
Product = Beer
14© 2013 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved.
The Draft: Relative Strength of a Mark
• Is it like this?
• Or this?
• Or this?
• If you are the only one you may have strong rights
• Could be dangerous if you are the junior user
• Safety in numbers, but there could be territorial battles and likely a weak mark
15© 2013 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved.
Training Camp – Set Up Protocol
Set up a protocol to keep business team happy
16© 2013 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved.
Training Camp – Set Up Protocol
• A clear protocol can help avoid issues
• Clearance process should empower marketing/business team and not leave them feeling on the sidelines
• Set a time frame for searching/clearance so can manage marketing/business team's expectations
• Set budget for clearance (and obtaining registration)?
17© 2013 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved.
Training Camp – Set Up Protocol
• Get marketing/business team to “buy in” to strong marks
• Meet with marketing/business team regularly to:
- understand product launches
- game plans for the year
18© 2013 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved.
Training Camp – Questions to ask your team before searching
• Is this a new mark or a variation of an existing mark?
• What is the meaning/origin for choosing the mark?
• Is the mark based on someone else’s mark?
• When is product launch? Has it occurred already?
• Are there any logos or distinctive stylizations?
• Are there any alternate marks being considered?
• Any unique trade dress to consider protecting?
19© 2013 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved.
Training Camp – Questions to ask your team before searching
• What are the products/services?
–Are there product/service extension opportunities?
–Are there any ancillary products/services to consider?
–What are future plans for the brand?
• What countries are you targeting with your brand?
20© 2013 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved.
Your PlaybookTypical steps in protocol
• Marketing/business team develops marks
• PR Issues?
• Is it protectable?
• Is it available?
– Knock out search on USPTO website/other TM offices
– Is domain name available?
– Further searching
• In-house search?
• Full search?
• Foreign search?
• If mark is clear, implement registration process
21© 2013 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved.
Key Equipment
• TM office websites
– http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/gate.exe?f=tess&state=4804:g2z8gq.1.1
– http://ttabvue.uspto.gov/ttabvue/
• Madrid database -http://www.wipo.int/madrid/en/services/madrid_ express.htm
• OHIM (EU) TMview – free and covers most of Europe
http://tmview.europa.eu/tmview/welcome.html
• Canada - http://www.cipo.ic.gc.ca/app/opic-cipo/trdmrks/srch/bscSrch.do?lang=eng
• Pacer (litigation searching)
22© 2013 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved.
Key Equipment
Other important websites
• Amazon – check to see if products being sold
• www.archive.org – view what a website previously looked like
• Translations – www.freetranslations.com
• WhoIs – check domain name registration data, when was it registered, when does it expire, who owns it
• Acronym Finder – www.acronymfinder.com
23© 2013 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved.
Calling the Right Play
How much searching is enough?
• Budget?
• Where will products be sold?
• Is it a house mark, brand name, or secondary mark?
– MOLSON house mark
– DWARF BEER; SASQUATCH– product name
– ALASKAN JUNIPER, CANADIAN MAPLE - flavors
• Do we need to search for trade dress, logos, tag lines, etc.?
24© 2013 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved.
Calling the Right Play • Full search – looks at USPTO and state databases, as well
as unregistered, common law uses
• In-house search – typically just USPTO and state records
• Consider at least in-house worldwide screening search at the outset
• Full search for important marks
• Consider conducting in-use investigations – multiple investigations can be cost prohibitive
• Specialized Searching – e.g., for trade dress (can be more difficult to search in-house) for alcohol products, check COLA records; for entertainment properties, do title search
25© 2013 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved.
Calling the Right Play - Don’t Fumble
• Surnames – not registrable on Principal Register without secondary meaning
• Geographic terms considered descriptive
• Geographically misdescriptive marks not registrable
• Translate foreign word marks into English and clear them
• Even full searches have limitations and there are time lags
• Check for words with similar meanings –YETI/ABOMINABLE SNOWMAN
26© 2013 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved.
Calling the Right Play - Don’t Fumble
• Does the mark have a negative connotation or slang? In foreign languages?
– Is the use of DWARF as a brand offensive?
– CHEVY NOVA – CHEVY DOESN’T GO
– P&G detergent DREFT was originally “Dreck” which is Yiddish/German for “crap”
– Rolls Royce SILVER SERAPH was originally SILVER MIST but “mist” sounded like German slang for manure
• Consider engaging local expert, especially in China, for localized translations/transliterations
• Register local translations/transliterations - YOWIE in Australia
27© 2013 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved.
Safe vs. Risky Plays - What is the risk? • What is risk tolerance of company?
• How deep to search? When to clear a mark?
– Depends on the product
– Depends on the mark (house mark, product mark, feature level mark)
– Depends on the shelf life – part of permanent product line vs. seasonal use
– How easy is it to remove if worst case scenario?
• Online only use could be easy to revise
• Removing mark from product or cover with sticker?
– Is a mark technically ever “clear” or without some risk?
– How much risk is too much risk?
– How comfortable is the business team with damage control?
28© 2013 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved.
Safe vs. Risky Plays - What is the risk?
Assessing risk –
• No mark is “risk free”
• Define parameters so legal and marketing/business team are on same page with level of risk – what is low, moderate, high really mean to the company?
• Example
– Low risk of conflict – greater than 75% chance of prevailing in a conflict
– Moderate risk of conflict – 35%-75% chance of prevailing in a conflict
– High risk of conflict – less than 35% chance of prevailing in a conflict
29© 2013 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved.
Safe vs. Risky Plays - What is the risk?
Assessing risk –
• What increases risk?
– Closer the marks
– More distinctive the third party mark
– Closer the goods/services
– Overlap customers
– Overlap channels of trade
– How vigorously third party enforces brand
30© 2013 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved.
Safe vs. Risky Plays - What is the risk?
Assessing risk –
• Cannot always predict how a third party will react
– Some third parties may use objection as a way to get $ - are you a deep pocket?
– Reaction could depend on how visible your use is
– Could there be a bad PR situation?
• Consider risk of reverse confusion
31© 2013 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved.
Safe vs. Risky Plays - What is the risk?Search results yield a hit:
• Investigate – if ongoing litigation, be mindful of contacting target directly
– When did use commence?
– On what goods/services?
– What geographic area?
– Still using/abandoned?
– www.archive.org
• If no use, do you get aggressive – file cancellation action early?
– Cut off resumption of use
– Contact to purchase registration?
32© 2013 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved.
Audibles – Fixes for Potential Issues
au•di•blen. 1. (in football) an alternative play called by the quarterback
If key domain name registered:• Is it in use or parked?
- Order snapback?- Purchase anonymously
• What alternate domain names can you pursue?- For beer: ____beer.com- For beverage: drink____.com- For products/clothing: shop____.com
33© 2013 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved.
Audibles –Fixes for Potential Issues
• Would a tweak of the mark or addition of house mark or other elements mitigate risk to an acceptable level?
• Consider limitations to the use and/or goods and services to cover under trademark filings
• Consider purchasing prior rights
• Time permitting, utilize building block approach to increase fence of protection around the brand
• Consider different branding in different jurisdictions (many times, not ideal, however)
34© 2013 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved.
Avoiding Penalties
Silly mistakes to avoid
35© 2013 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved.
Illegal Procedure – Not Enough Searching
Don’t just search where product will be sold. Also --
• Search where products will be manufactured
• Search where potential infringements can occur
• These should be key target jurisdictions for registration as well
36© 2013 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved.
False Start – Proceeding Without a Knock Out
Knock out search –
• Can be done quickly and cheaply to avoid spending money when could easily know of issue
– Don’t just check identical mark
• DWARF
• DWARVES
• LITTLE PEOPLE
– If knock out is clear, don’t stop there
37© 2013 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved.
Illegal Substitution
• Marketing/business team should notify legal:
– If change mark
– If change products or services
• DWARF tequila?
– If change territory
• Consider new searches
38© 2013 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved.
Personal Foul
• Don’t use own mark as descriptive term on webpage or Wikipedia
• Don’t tout functional elements on collateral or in utility patents for any design for which you would like to seek trade dress protection or for any colors that you would like to try to protect
• Coach business team to use marks in a manner that would be sufficient to perfect registration
39© 2013 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved.
Bad Coaching• An abandoned or cancelled mark could still be in use
• Not checking for common law uses as they could limit rights
• For marks which are closer to the line of descriptiveness, not checking to see how PTO handles the term
– Will the PTO require a disclaimer?
• Not checking to see if there have been any oppositions or cancellations filed by third parties? Lit search?
– Are there any litigious parties or those that vigorously enforce their brands?
– CHAMPAGNE; GALLO; ARMOUR
• Registering a company with the Secretary of State does not mean you are free to use the company name as a mark
40© 2013 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved.
Bad Coaching• Not ordering watch service as soon as file – for
important marks
– Ideally obtain application and publication watch
– Consider domain name watch
• Not grabbing relevant domain names prior to or as soon as file for mark
• Not digging in
– Logo/design mark
• Who came up with it?
• Do we need an assignment?
• Can we file for copyright?
41© 2013 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved.
Things that will get you benched
• Delay of game: Taking too long to clear a mark
• Saying everything has unacceptable “risk”
• Not giving clear guidance on availability and registrability
– Give suggestions if there is an alternate available –can a slight tweak alleviate a conflict?
– Take the time to explain issues or why mark is not clear
42© 2013 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved.
STATEGIC PLAYS = TOUCHDOWN!
QUESTIONS?
Stephen Coates [email protected] Natland [email protected] 949-760-0404Jonathan Hyman [email protected] 310-551-3450