Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Plan to I Plan to I Plan to I Plan to Include Special Hauling Vehicle in the nclude Special Hauling Vehicle in the nclude Special Hauling Vehicle in the nclude Special Hauling Vehicle in the ODOT ODOT ODOT ODOT Load Rating Load Rating Load Rating Load Rating Process (V 2. Process (V 2. Process (V 2. Process (V 2.1) As per FHWA Memo dated: November 15, 2013 (Appendix A), the NCHRP Project 12-63 showed the current AASHTO Type 3, 3S2, and 3-3 legal load configurations are not adequately representative of all legal loads. Information from the study showed that trucks weighing up to 80,000 lbs. and meeting the Federal Bridge Formula B requirements may cause stresses exceeding those stresses due to the HS20 loading by up to 22% and Type 3, 3S2 and 3-3 loads by over 50%. Ohio currently uses its own set of legal trucks (2F1, 3F1, 4F1 and 5C1) for load rating. These truck configurations have been in use for many years, but the recent information received from the FHWA has prompted ODOT to re-evaluate the adequacy of these truck configurations when compared to the Specialized Hauling Vehicles (SHV). A simple in-house comparison of moments produced by the AASHTO SHV showed an increase of up to 25% over the Ohio legal trucks. A POA has been prepared to incorporate the AASHTO Notional Rating Load (NRL) in the current Ohio rating practices. 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Implementation of SHV Implementation of SHV Implementation of SHV Implementation of SHV for for for for New New New New and Revised and Revised and Revised and Revised Load Rating Load Rating Load Rating Load Ratings In addition to the current Ohio legal trucks, the NRL (and/or SHV) as per AASHTO Manual for Bridge Evaluation, Second Edition, shall be used for all new load rating analyses. The load rating analysis shall be performed according to one of the procedures given below. When revising the load rating analysis of an existing bridge previously rated by Allowable Stress or Load Factor methods, the load rater can use either the LFR (Load Factor Rating) or LRFR (Load and Resistance Factor Rating). 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Implementation Implementation Implementation Implementation of SHV Rating on the Existing Bridge Load Ratings of SHV Rating on the Existing Bridge Load Ratings of SHV Rating on the Existing Bridge Load Ratings of SHV Rating on the Existing Bridge Load Ratings The existing bridges, for which the load ratings have been completed, will be divided into Groups A, B or C. Group A. Any bridge with the controlling Ohio Legal RF ≥ 1.35 will not require any action involving NRL loading unless a change in conditions occurs which would require an updated load rating analysis, e.g., a new wearing surface or any deterioration that will require a new load rating analysis and may cause the bridge to be in Group B or C. ODOT will conduct a study of a set of bridges in Group A (Ohio Legal RF ≥ 1.35) to ensure those bridges will not require any posting for SHV. The study will be completed before the FHWA Memo deadline of December 31, 2022. Group B. All bridges with the controlling Ohio Legal RF ≥ 1.0 and RF < 1.35 a. Re-rate all bridges according to their current method of analysis (LFR or LRFR) according to one of the procedures, given below b. Prepare an updated BR-100 and posting recommendations, if needed c. Update the rating factor information in the SMS d. Post the bridge with new bridge posting sign, if needed within the period specified in the BDM Section 900 e. Tentative completion date of calculations: December 31, 2022.
14
Embed
SHV Implementation Plan ODOT FHWA V2.1...BR100 Rating Summary form (Appendix G) will be prepared and stored in the bridge file by the bridge owners. 6.0 6.0 SignageSignage For bridges
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Plan to IPlan to IPlan to IPlan to Include Special Hauling Vehicle in the nclude Special Hauling Vehicle in the nclude Special Hauling Vehicle in the nclude Special Hauling Vehicle in the ODOT ODOT ODOT ODOT Load Rating Load Rating Load Rating Load Rating
Process (V 2.Process (V 2.Process (V 2.Process (V 2.1111))))
As per FHWA Memo dated: November 15, 2013 (Appendix A), the NCHRP Project 12-63 showed
the current AASHTO Type 3, 3S2, and 3-3 legal load configurations are not adequately representative
of all legal loads. Information from the study showed that trucks weighing up to 80,000 lbs. and meeting
the Federal Bridge Formula B requirements may cause stresses exceeding those stresses due to the HS20
loading by up to 22% and Type 3, 3S2 and 3-3 loads by over 50%.
Ohio currently uses its own set of legal trucks (2F1, 3F1, 4F1 and 5C1) for load rating. These truck
configurations have been in use for many years, but the recent information received from the FHWA has
prompted ODOT to re-evaluate the adequacy of these truck configurations when compared to the
Specialized Hauling Vehicles (SHV). A simple in-house comparison of moments produced by the
AASHTO SHV showed an increase of up to 25% over the Ohio legal trucks. A POA has been prepared
to incorporate the AASHTO Notional Rating Load (NRL) in the current Ohio rating practices.
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Implementation of SHV Implementation of SHV Implementation of SHV Implementation of SHV for for for for New New New New and Revised and Revised and Revised and Revised Load RatingLoad RatingLoad RatingLoad Ratingssss
In addition to the current Ohio legal trucks, the NRL (and/or SHV) as per AASHTO Manual for
Bridge Evaluation, Second Edition, shall be used for all new load rating analyses. The load rating
analysis shall be performed according to one of the procedures given below. When revising the load
rating analysis of an existing bridge previously rated by Allowable Stress or Load Factor methods, the
load rater can use either the LFR (Load Factor Rating) or LRFR (Load and Resistance Factor Rating).
2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 ImplementationImplementationImplementationImplementation of SHV Rating on the Existing Bridge Load Ratingsof SHV Rating on the Existing Bridge Load Ratingsof SHV Rating on the Existing Bridge Load Ratingsof SHV Rating on the Existing Bridge Load Ratings
The existing bridges, for which the load ratings have been completed, will be divided into Groups A, B
or C.
Group A. Any bridge with the controlling Ohio Legal RF ≥ 1.35 will not require any action
involving NRL loading unless a change in conditions occurs which would require an updated
load rating analysis, e.g., a new wearing surface or any deterioration that will require a new load
rating analysis and may cause the bridge to be in Group B or C. ODOT will conduct a study of a
set of bridges in Group A (Ohio Legal RF ≥ 1.35) to ensure those bridges will not require any
posting for SHV. The study will be completed before the FHWA Memo deadline of December
31, 2022.
Group B. All bridges with the controlling Ohio Legal RF ≥ 1.0 and RF < 1.35
a. Re-rate all bridges according to their current method of analysis (LFR or LRFR)
according to one of the procedures, given below
b. Prepare an updated BR-100 and posting recommendations, if needed
c. Update the rating factor information in the SMS
d. Post the bridge with new bridge posting sign, if needed within the period specified in the
BDM Section 900
e. Tentative completion date of calculations: December 31, 2022.
Approximate number of NBI bridges in Group B
Inspection Responsibility
COUNT Structure
File Number
ODOT 608
OTPC 100
CEAO 6157
MUNI 335
Group C. All bridges that are currently posted, i.e., with controlling Ohio Legal RF<1.0
a. Re-rate all bridges according to their method of analysis (LFR or LRFR) according to one
of the procedures, given below
b. Prepare an updated BR-100 and new posting recommendation, if needed
c. Update the rating factor information in the SMS
d. Post the bridge with new bridge posting sign, if needed within the period specified in the
BDM Section 900
e. Tentative completion date: January 1, 2018
Approximate number of NBI bridges in Group C
Inspection Responsibility
COUNT Structure
File Number
ODOT 20
OTPC 1
CEAO 1,172
MUNI 52
3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Procedure for Procedure for Procedure for Procedure for Load RatingLoad RatingLoad RatingLoad Rating for AASHTO HS20, Ohio Legal Trucks and for AASHTO HS20, Ohio Legal Trucks and for AASHTO HS20, Ohio Legal Trucks and for AASHTO HS20, Ohio Legal Trucks and SHV by LFR SHV by LFR SHV by LFR SHV by LFR
MMMMethodethodethodethod
Inventory or design level load rating shall be performed for the following load (Appendix B):
• AASHTO HS20
Operating level load rating shall be performed for the following load:
• AASHTO HS20
• Ohio Legal load rating shall be performed for the following loads (Appendix C):
a. 2F1 Truck
b. 3F1 Truck
c. 4F1 Truck
d. 5C1 Truck
• SHV rating shall be performed for the following AASHTO loads (Appendices D & E):
a. NRL
b. SU4
c. SU5
d. SU6
e. SU7
The analysis for the NRL shall be performed as follows: Begin by analyzing the bridge with the
NRL. In the event that the NRL rating factor is less than 1.0, rate the bridge for the SU4, SU5, SU6 and
SU7 trucks (Appendix F). If any of the rating factors for these trucks are less than 1.0, special weight
reduction posting will be required.
4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Procedure for Procedure for Procedure for Procedure for Load RatingLoad RatingLoad RatingLoad Rating for AASHTO HLfor AASHTO HLfor AASHTO HLfor AASHTO HL----93, Ohio Legal Trucks and 93, Ohio Legal Trucks and 93, Ohio Legal Trucks and 93, Ohio Legal Trucks and SHV by LRFR SHV by LRFR SHV by LRFR SHV by LRFR
MMMMethodethodethodethod
Inventory or design level load rating shall be performed for the following load (Appendix B):
• AASHTO HL93
Operating level load rating shall be performed for the following load:
• AASHTO HL93
• Ohio Legal load rating shall be performed for the following loads (Appendix C):
a. 2F1 Truck
b. 3F1 Truck
c. 4F1 Truck
d. 5C1 Truck
• SHV rating shall be performed for the following AASHTO loads (Appendices D & E):
a. NRL
b. SU4
c. SU5
d. SU6
e. SU7
The analysis for the NRL shall be performed as follows: Begin by analyzing the bridge with the NRL.
In the event that the NRL rating factor is less than 1.0, rate the bridge for the SU4, SU5, SU6 and SU7
trucks (Appendix F). If any of the rating factors for these trucks are less than 1.0, special weight reduction