This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
T-Minus 6 Months and Counting!T-Minus 6 Months and Counting!
May 21, 2014
Chatrane Birbal, Senior Advisor, Government RelationsNancy Hammer, Senior Government Affairs Policy Counsel, Government AffairsKelly Hastings, Senior Advisor, Government Relations
“. . . Some require Congressional action, and I’m eager to work with all of you. But America does not stand still – and neither will I. So wherever and whenever I can take steps without legislation to expand opportunity for more American families, that’s what I’m going to do.”
National Labor Relations Board National Labor Relations Board
Proposed Rule to Amend Representation Election Proposed Rule to Amend Representation Election ProceduProceduresres
Rule was reissued by the NLRB in the Federal Register on February 5. The proposed rule is nearly identical to regulations proposed in 2011.
The proposal would revise the process for union representation elections, expediting the period of time between the filing of NLRB election petition and the election itself. The regional director could set a pre-election hearing to begin seven days after a hearing notice is served and a post-election hearing 14 days after the tally of ballots.
Provides for the electronic filing and transmission of election petitions.
Employers would be required to turn over private employee information to the NLRB and the petitioning party, including employee telephone numbers and e-mail.
SHRM raised the following concerns to the proposed rule in its comments:
Shortened time frame between the filing of an NLRB representation case petition and election;
Failure to establish a record supporting new election rules; Detrimental changes to the Board election proceedings and; Changes to voter list rules infringe on employee privacy rights.
We were joined in its comments by 96 SHRM state councils and chapters and over 4,600 individual members submitted their own comments to the NLRB as well.
SHRM member Roger King of Jones Day testified before the NLRB on April 10 on these issues.
SHRM member Steve Browne also testified before the House Education and Workforce committee on the proposed rule in March.
Department of Labor Department of Labor Proposed Rule to Amend 541 Overtime RegulationsProposed Rule to Amend 541 Overtime Regulations
President Obama sent a presidential memorandum to the Department of Labor (DOL) on March 13, directing the Agency to “modernize” and “simplify” the Section 541 rules.
Under the FLSA 541 Regulations, an employee qualifies as exempt from overtime if he or she satisfies a “duties test” (under the Executive, Administrative, Professional, Computer and Outside Sales regulations) and the employee is paid on a “Salary Basis.”
Department of Labor Department of Labor Proposed Rule to Amend 541 Overtime Proposed Rule to Amend 541 Overtime RegulationsRegulations
Although we have not seen a proposal, we understand the changes may include doubling the “Salary Basis” amount from $455 dollars a week ($23,660 annually) to $910 dollars a week ($47,320 annually).
Proposal will also modify the “duties test” making changes to definitions and possibly changing key terms and elements, particularly in the “primary duty” area.
DOL will be holding a series of listening events in the months leading up to the announcement and SHRM anticipates that we will be part of those sessions.
Department of Labor Department of Labor Executive Order on Non-Retaliation for Disclosure of Executive Order on Non-Retaliation for Disclosure of Compensation InformationCompensation Information
Announced by the President on April 8, prohibits a federal contractor from discriminating against or discharging an employee or applicant who “has inquired about, discussed, or disclosed the compensation of the employee or applicant or another employee or applicant.”
The executive order directs the DOL to propose regulations to implement these requirements within 160 days.
The order is effective immediately and applies to contract entered into on or after the effective date of the DOL rule.
Department of Labor Department of Labor Executive Order on Non-Retaliation for Disclosure of Executive Order on Non-Retaliation for Disclosure of Compensation InformationCompensation Information
Announced by the President on April 8, prohibits a federal contractor from discriminating against or discharging an employee or applicant who “has inquired about, discussed, or disclosed the compensation of the employee or applicant or another employee or applicant.”
The executive order directs the DOL to propose regulations to implement these requirements within 160 days.
The order is effective immediately and applies to contract entered into on or after the effective date of the DOL rule.
Department of Labor Department of Labor Presidential Memorandum on Advancing Pay Equality through Presidential Memorandum on Advancing Pay Equality through Compensation Data CollectionCompensation Data Collection
Announced by the President on April 8, it directs the DOL to propose, within 120 days, a rule requiring federal contractors and subcontractors to submit to DOL summary data on the compensation paid to employees, including information by race and sex.
In 2011, SHRM submitted comments to the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) on a similar proposed rule.
SHRM’s comments raised several concerns with the proposal including the need to protect proprietary employer information on compensation systems.
A bill that focuses on employment verification, makes E-Verify mandatory within six months to two years of enactment, preempts state laws, and while it takes steps toward modernizing the current E-Verify system, further changes are needed to combat identity theft in the verification process. (Passed in Committee June 2013)
Ensure Employers have the Tools to Hire Legal Workforce. E-Verify must use state-of-the-art technology, such as knowledge based authentication, to accurately authenticate a new hire’s identity to combat against identity theft.
Developed to ensure when policy decision-makers (legislators, regulators, etc.) develop workplace policy, the voice of HR is heard via a “local network”
Since MoC’s are most responsive to their constituents, informs legislators of policy impacts upon employers in her / his district
SHRM members best understand / are best suited to communicate how public policy affects employees, employers & the HR profession as a whole
SHRM members are constituents with an interest in policy that will sway legislators and develop credible and influential relationships with elected officials