Top Banner
13

Shoestring2014 9-sapflow

Jul 04, 2015

Download

Environment

melnhe

Does Wollastonite Make Trees More Thirsty? Measuring Sap Flow Sophie Harrison, Shoestring Crew 2014, University of Michigan
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Shoestring2014 9-sapflow
Page 2: Shoestring2014 9-sapflow

Background

• Hubbard Brook whole-watershed transpiration response to wollastonite (CaSiO3) addition: mechanisms unclear (Green et al. 2013)

• MELNHE wollastonite plots established in 2011 with aim to clarify

• Measuring sap flow is one method to estimate transpiration (Granier, 1987)

Page 3: Shoestring2014 9-sapflow

Background

• Preliminary sap flow measurements from HB Ca suggest increased transpiration in wollastonite treatment (Zahoret al. 2013)

Page 4: Shoestring2014 9-sapflow

Research Question

• Does a wollastonite addition increase tree transpiration?

• Expect that it does, possibly due to increased xylem and fine root growth

• Alternatively, sap flow measurements could reflect the transition to decreased transpiration observed in W1 (Green et al. 2013)

Page 5: Shoestring2014 9-sapflow

Methods

• Sap flow measured by the Granier method: reference probe 10 cm below thermocouple heating probe with constant source of heat, measures temperature difference (ΔT) (Granier, 1987)

• Measurements collected by data logger every 30 seconds, average recorded every 15 minutes

• ΔT is converted to sapflux (Js, g x m2 x s-1) using BaseLinersoftware (Oren and Parashkevov, 2012)

(Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry)

Page 6: Shoestring2014 9-sapflow

Methods

• Sap flow to be measured in wollastonite and control plots at mature stands in Bartlett Experimental Forest (C8), Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest (Ca) and Jeffers Brook

• 9 canopy trees measured per plot: 3 American beech, 3 sugar maple and 3 yellow birch

• Measurements collected for ~5 days per stand

Page 7: Shoestring2014 9-sapflow

Results

0

5

10

15

20

25

171.5 172 172.5 173 173.5 174 174.5 175 175.5 176 176.5 177

Sap

flu

x (J

s, g

x m

2 x

s-1

)

Ordinal Date and Time

Bartlett C8

C8 Control AB

C8 Control SM

C8 Control YB

C8 Ca AB

C8 Ca SM

C8 Ca YB

Page 8: Shoestring2014 9-sapflow

Results

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

12:00 AM 4:48 AM 9:36 AM 2:24 PM 7:12 PM 12:00 AM 4:48 AM

Sap

flu

x (J

s, g

x m

2 x

s-1

)

C8 Yellow Birch 1 (CaSiO3)

YB1

• Example of a representative diurnal curve

Page 9: Shoestring2014 9-sapflow

• Within species, more variation across trees

than across treatments

CaSiO3

Control

0

5

10

15

20

25

12:00 AM 4:48 AM 9:36 AM 2:24 PM 7:12 PM 12:00 AM 4:48 AM

Sap

flu

x (J

s, g

x m

2 x

s-1

)

C8 American Beech

AB1

AB4

AB5

AB6

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

12:00 AM 4:48 AM 9:36 AM 2:24 PM 7:12 PM 12:00 AM 4:48 AM

Sap

flu

x (J

s, g

x m

2 x

s-1

)

C8 Sugar Maple

SM1

SM3

SM4

SM5

SM6

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

12:00 AM 4:48 AM 9:36 AM 2:24 PM 7:12 PM 12:00 AM 4:48 AM

Sap

flu

x (J

s, g

x m

2 x

s-1

)

C8 Yellow Birch

YB1

YB2

YB3

YB4

YB5

YB6

Page 10: Shoestring2014 9-sapflow

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

12:00 AM 4:48 AM 9:36 AM 2:24 PM 7:12 PM 12:00 AM 4:48 AM

Sap

flu

x (J

s, g

x m

2 x

s-1

)

HB Sugar Maple

SM2

SM3

SM4

SM5

SM6

0

5

10

15

20

25

12:00 AM 4:48 AM 9:36 AM 2:24 PM 7:12 PM 12:00 AM 4:48 AM

Sap

flu

x (J

s, g

x m

2 x

s-1

)

HB American Beech

AB1

AB3

AB4

AB5

AB6

0

5

10

15

20

25

12:00 AM 4:48 AM 9:36 AM 2:24 PM 7:12 PM 12:00 AM 4:48 AM

Sap

flu

x (J

s, g

x m

2 x

s-1

)

HB Yellow Birch

YB1

YB3

YB5

YB6

CaSiO3

Control

• Within species, more variation across trees

than across treatments

Page 11: Shoestring2014 9-sapflow

Conclusion

• No apparent trends in sapflux between treatments, individual trees highly variable

• Solid dataset to work with that will help direct future sap flow efforts

Page 12: Shoestring2014 9-sapflow

Future Work

• Reevaluate methods: increase sample size and consider additional factors in analysis

• Take sap flow measurements from Jeffers Brook, then return to Bartlett C8 and Hubbard Brook for the remainder of the field season

• Develop a statistical model to determine significance

Page 13: Shoestring2014 9-sapflow

References & Acknowledgements

• Granier, A. (1987). Evaluation of transpiration in a Douglas-fir stand by means of sap flow measurements. Tree Physiology 3: 309-320.

• Green, M.B., et al. (2013). Decreased water flowing from a forest amended with calcium silicate. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences110(15):5999-6003.

• Oren, Parashkevov, & Duke University. (2012). BaseLiner (Version 2.4.2) http://ch2oecology.env.duke.edu/orenlab/sofware.html

• Michele Pruyn

• Mariann Johnston

• Mark Green

• Ruth Yanai

• Adam Wild, our glorious leader

• Shoestring Crew