Top Banner
SHOCK AND RESUSCITATION Hugh M. Foy, MD Harborview Medical Center University of Washington
37
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Shock_Foy08 (1).pptx

SHOCK AND RESUSCITATION

Hugh M. Foy, MD

Harborview Medical Center

University of Washington

Page 2: Shock_Foy08 (1).pptx

Shock and Resuscitation

Goal: understand the pathophysiology of shock and it’s treatment

• Objectives:– Be able to categorize types of shock– Understand mechanisms of adapting to

volume loss of blood loss– Demonstrate shock treatment:

• lines, sites, types of fluid• End points of resuscitation• Complications of treatment

Page 3: Shock_Foy08 (1).pptx

SHOCK: Definition

• Commonly misused– “psychogenic”– Webster: 12 different definitions

• 4: “the state of profound depression of the vital processes associated with reduced blood volume and pressure and caused usually by severe esp. crushing injuries, hemorrhage, or burns.”

“The rude unhinging of the machinery of life” Gross 1872

Page 4: Shock_Foy08 (1).pptx

Types of Shock

• “Classic” Blalock 1937

– Hematogenic– Neurogenic– Vasogenic– Cardiogenic

Page 5: Shock_Foy08 (1).pptx

Classification of Shock• Low Cardiac Output states

– Hypovolemic shock• volume loss• Internal volume loss

– Cardiac shock• Impaired inflow• Primary pump

dysfunction• Impaired outflow

– Low peripheral resistance states

• Neurogenic shock– Loss of sympathetic

tone• Vasogenic Shock

– Septic– Anaphylactic

Carrico: ACS Early Care of the Injured Patient 4th Ed.

Page 6: Shock_Foy08 (1).pptx

The Circulatory System

• Components:– Heart (pump)– Blood Vessels– Blood

Page 7: Shock_Foy08 (1).pptx

Circulation and Electricity

• Circulation– The flow of blood

• Electricity – The flow of electrons

• Ohms law: V= IR (Voltage = Current x

Resistance)

BP = CO x SVR • (Cardiac Output x System

Vascular Resistance)

Page 8: Shock_Foy08 (1).pptx

Circulation Schematic

• The Pump (heart)– 2 sided

• Anatomically looks parallel, BUT:

• Physiologically and in Actuality

– Supplies 2 systems connected in series

Page 9: Shock_Foy08 (1).pptx

2-Sided Pump

• Right Side– Compliant, flexible– Low pressure,

variable volume• Left Side

– Stiff, strong– High pressure,

fixed volume

Like the colon?

The Heart:

Page 10: Shock_Foy08 (1).pptx

The Circulatory System

• Multiple Parallel Circuits– Organized

teleologically: • Prioritized supply

– Closest circuits get supplied first and foremost

» Coronaries, Brain, Kidneys

– Distal circuits get shut down when volume low

» Gut/Muscle, Skin

Page 11: Shock_Foy08 (1).pptx

Circulatory Control Mechanisms

• Closest, fastest– Carotid Bodies (Baroreceptors)

• Stimulate Sympathetic Nervous System

• Mid-level– Kidneys- Juxtaglomerular

Apparatus• Sense low flow and stimulate

Renin resulting in vasoconstriction (splancnic)

• Down-line– Adrenal Cortex

• Senses need for more Sodium and Fluid Re-absorbtion to deal with upright posture volume needs

Page 12: Shock_Foy08 (1).pptx

Acute Volume Loss

• Shock - Classes:

I 0-15% blood lossII 15-30% blood lossIII 30-40% blood lossIV >40% blood loss

SHOCK

Page 13: Shock_Foy08 (1).pptx

Response to Volume Loss

Type % blood loss HR BP Postural Cap Ref

• I 0-15% nl nl maybe nl• II 15-30% + maybe yes nl• III 30-40% +++ decr moot incr• IV >40% ++++ <60Sys “ incr

Page 14: Shock_Foy08 (1).pptx

Shock Resuscitation StudyShires, et al

• Bled dogs 40% blood volume– 100% mortality

untreated• Bled, then gave back

blood– 80% mortality– Autopsy study

• Swollen muscle cells despite total volume loss

• Tagged RBCs, Na+, K+, Alb., and repeated the experiment

Page 15: Shock_Foy08 (1).pptx

Results

• Na+ leaked into cells• K+ leaked out of

cells• Albumin leaked into

interstitial space• Water followed Na+ • Translocated fluid 3

times the shed blood• Measured

composition of transloc. fluid

Shires Shock Study

Page 16: Shock_Foy08 (1).pptx

Conclusions

• Translocated Fluid composition is LR • Inadequate O2 delivery shuts down Na+/K+

pumps, making cells leaky

• Repeated the Experiment:– Gave Shed Blood plus 3 times volume of LR

• Mortality decreased from 80 to 30%

Shires Shock Study

Page 17: Shock_Foy08 (1).pptx

Treatment of Shock

• Recognize Type of Shock

• If definite pump failure and cardiogenic shock institute cardiac protocols

• Otherwise: 2 large bore, upper extremity lines and:– Volume– Volume– Volume

When in doubt, try a little more volume

Page 18: Shock_Foy08 (1).pptx

Treatment of Shock

• Goal: Restore perfusion

• Method: Depends on type of Shock– Basically 2 kinds:

• Hypovolemic (hemorrhagic, septic, neurogen.)

• Cardiogenic (Impedence or primary Cardiac Failure)

Page 19: Shock_Foy08 (1).pptx

Treatment:Cardiogenic Shock

• Oxygen by nasal cannula• IV access

– Pain medication– Nitrates prn-

• may need unloading only after volume status addressed

– Treat arrythmias– CPR as needed

Page 20: Shock_Foy08 (1).pptx

Treatment of Shock

• Prioritized approach• Must address and treat sequentially:

– PRELOAD– AFTERLOAD– PUMP

• QUESTIONs:– What type of fluid– How Much– End Point of Resuscitation

Page 21: Shock_Foy08 (1).pptx

Resuscitation Fluids

• Blood• Lactated Ringers• Normal Saline• Colloids• Hypertonic Saline• Blood Substitutes

Page 22: Shock_Foy08 (1).pptx

Treatment: Hemorrhagic Shock

• Large bore access – 2 upper extremity IVs– 16 gauge or larger

• Bolus therapy– 20 cc/kg– Adults- 2 liters

• Monitor Effect• Repeat if necessary• After 2nd bolus: need

blood txn – 10cc/kg

Page 23: Shock_Foy08 (1).pptx

End Points of Resuscitation:

• Restoration of normal vital signs• Adequate Urine output

– 0.5 - 1.0 cc/kg/hr• Tissue Oxygenation measurement• Adequate Cardiac Index• Normalization of Oxygen delivery DO2I• Normal Serum Lactate levels

none proven helpful, some deleterious

Englehart; Curr Op Crit Care; Vol 12(6), Dec 06, p 579-574

Page 24: Shock_Foy08 (1).pptx

Evolution in Treatment Strategies

• Auto transfusion (“Cell Saver”)• Hyperdynamic “Supranormal”

Resuscitation (Shoemaker)• Less is More - Mattox• Trauma Vaccine - Vedder, et al.• Hypertonic Saline• Glue Grant-

– standardization, endpoints, genetics

Page 25: Shock_Foy08 (1).pptx

Alternatives to Transfusion:• Autotransfusion

– Safe, warm, better 2-3 DPG levels

– Coagulation factors present

– 2 methods• Passive collection and

anti-coagulant (chest tubes)

• “Cell Saver”- washes Red Cells

– Contamination and Time issues in trauma

• Expensive, fussy, too slow in trauma, • Okay in elective, clean cases

Page 26: Shock_Foy08 (1).pptx

Hyperdynamic “Supranormal” Resuscitation• Swan Ganz Catheter• Measure ratio of O2 delivery

and consumption• Push fluid resuscitation until

no longer “flow dependent”• Massive Edema can be lethal

– (DaNang Lung, ARDS, MSOF, SIRS, Abdominal Comp. Syn.

Multiple synergistic factors: some influenced by ventilator strategy

Page 27: Shock_Foy08 (1).pptx

Mattox in HoustonQ: Is less fluid better?

• Randomized pts. QOD • LR vs 250 cc. Hypertonic Saline/Dextran• 3% increase in survival in HSD (not significant)• Trend in increase survival in penetrating trauma

victims only • Prospective trial showed only a trend in

improvement, with low n of 48 pts• May be beneficial with head injuries only

• Ann Surg 1991;213:482-491• Am J Surg 1989;157:528-34

Page 28: Shock_Foy08 (1).pptx

“We’ll see”

Page 29: Shock_Foy08 (1).pptx

Trauma Vaccine Trials

• Shock-

“Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury”

* WBCs “up-regulated”

adhere to endothelium

* Damaged endothelium leaky

Create massive edema

Blocking adherence -mAb 60.3

-neutropenia protective against ARDS

- WBC surface adhesion molecules when blocked

decreases the edema and injury

- animal data encouraging

Human Trials unsuccessful

Vedder, et al: Blood, 15 2002, Vol 100, No. 6, pp 2077-80

Page 30: Shock_Foy08 (1).pptx

HYPERTONIC SALINE WITH DEXTRAN (HSD)

7.5%saline with 6% dextran-70

• Less volume and weight to carry

• May reduce mortality• Limits secondary

brain injury• Less activation of

inflammatory cells

Page 31: Shock_Foy08 (1).pptx

Harborview Study

• Double blind, randomized study• N = 209• Endpoint: ARDS free survival

– 250 ml 7.5% HTS/ 6% Dextran70 vs LR• Findings:

– No difference in population overall– Improvement in sickest patients (19%)

• > 10 units PCs required

• Bulger et al: Arch Surg. 2008; 143(2); 139-148

Page 32: Shock_Foy08 (1).pptx

Shock-Treatment Algorithm

Page 33: Shock_Foy08 (1).pptx

Transcutaneous O2 Sat Monitoring

Page 34: Shock_Foy08 (1).pptx

Tissue Oxygenation Measurements

Cohn SM, Nathens AB, Moore FA, Rhee P, Puyana JC, Moore EE, Beilman GJ. J Trauma. 2007 Jan;62(1):44-54; discussion 54-5.

*StO2 <75 severe shock

78% MODS91% Dead

StO2 <75% in 1st hr.

* StO2 >7588%

MODS free survival

Similar to Base Deficit measurement

Page 35: Shock_Foy08 (1).pptx

Blood Transfusion

• Blood Banks safer• Some risk

unavoidable– New viruses are

inevitable– False negative

screening tests• Independent risk

factor for MSOD• Time for cross-match

delays RxThe Search for

Alternatives continues

Page 36: Shock_Foy08 (1).pptx

Alternatives to Transfusion:

• Blood Substitutes: – Immediately available, storage easier, no need

for compatibility testing, disease free– Polymerized, Stroma-free Hemoglobin

• 50 gm in 500 ml• No adverse effects up to 6 units• Slight increase in Bilirubin• Studies small, more needed

Gould:J Am Coll Surg 1998: 187:113-122

Page 37: Shock_Foy08 (1).pptx

SUMMARY

• The Circulation is a Circuit• Volume is most often the answer• Lactated Ringers still the standard• More is better than less, maybe• New techniques:

– Hypertonic Saline- • okay in Head Injury• Less immunosuppression• Helpful in the sickest patients

– Better Indicators & Endpoints of Resuscitation

Shock and Resuscitation: