Qun Wang/USTC/Chin a 1 Shear and Bulk viscosit y of QGP in PQCD Qun Wang Univ of Sci & Tech of China Chen, Dong, Ohnishi, QW, Phys. Lett. B685, 277(2010); Chen, Deng, Dong, QW, Phys. Rev. D83, 034031(2011); Chen, Deng, Dong, QW, arXiv:1107.0522 HIC in LHC era, 15-21 July 2012, Quy Nhon, Vietnam 1
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Qun Wang/USTC/China 1
Shear and Bulk viscosity of QGP in PQCD
Qun Wang
Univ of Sci & Tech of China
Chen, Dong, Ohnishi, QW, Phys. Lett. B685, 277(2010);
Bernard et al, (MILC) PRD 2007, Cheng et al, (RBC-Bielefeld) PRD 2008, Bazavov et al, (HotQCD), arXiv:0903.4379
8Shear & Bulk viscosity of QGP in PQCD
Qun Wang/USTC/China 9
Bulk viscosity at TcBulk viscosity at Tc
Helium-3 near the critical point
~ a few millions !
Bulk viscosity near T_c diverges in power law,closely related to fluctuation
Kogan, Meyer, J.Low.Temp.Phys.110,899(1998)
3-D Ising model9Shear & Bulk viscosity of QGP in PQCD
Qun Wang/USTC/China 10
Previous Previous worksworks on on ηη,,ζζ for QGP for QGP Shear viscosity: ►PV: Perturbative and Variational approachDanielewicz, Gyulassy, PRD31, 53(1985) ; Arnold, Moore and Yaffe, JHEP 0011, 001 (2000), 0305, 051 (2003).►Transport model : Xu, Greiner, PRL 100, 172301 (2008). ►Lattice : Meyer, PRD 76, 101701 (2007); NPA 830, 641C (2009). ►Anomalous: Asakawa et al, PRL 96, 252301(2006); Mujumder et al, PRL 99, 192301(2007).
ContradictingContradicting results on results on ηη ff or gluon plasma or gluon plasma
►PV: Perturbative and Variational approachDanielewicz, Gyulassy, Phys.Rev.D31, 53(1985) Dissipative Phenomena In Quark Gluon PlasmasArnold, Moore and Yaffe, JHEP 0011, 001 (2000),0305, 051 (2003)Transport coefficients in high temperature gauge theories: (I) Leading-log results (II): Beyond leading log ...........►BAMPS: Boltzmann Approach of MultiParton ScatteringsXu and Greiner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 172301(2008)Shear viscosity in a gluon gasXu, Greiner and Stoecker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 082302(2008)PQCD calculations of elliptic flow and shear viscosity at RHIC►Different results of AMY and XG for 2↔3 gluon process:
~(5-10)% (AMY) ~ (70-90)% (XG)
η (23) (AMY) >> η (23) (XG) σ(23) (AMY) << σ(23) (XG)
11Shear & Bulk viscosity of QGP in PQCD
Qun Wang/USTC/China 12
Difference: AMY vs XG Difference: AMY vs XG
1) A parton cascade model for solving the Boltzmann equation. Gluons are treated as a Boltzmann gas (i.e. a classical gas).
2) Gunion-Bertsch formula (soft emission) for gg↔ggg process.
12
XG
AMY1) The Boltzmann equation is solved in a variation method. Gluon as quantum gas.
2) For number changing processes Ng↔ (N+1)g: using collinear splitting g↔gg
Shear & Bulk viscosity of QGP in PQCD
Qun Wang/USTC/China 13
Our goal and strategyOur goal and strategy
Goal:
to calculate the shear/bulk viscosity in the leading order using Exact Matrix Element for gg↔ggg process to test previous results
Elements:
■Variational method and Linearized Boltzmann equation for 22+23 processes (AMY)■ 22: Hard Thermal Loop approximation for 22 (AMY)■ 23: Exact Matrix Element (new) + Gunion-Bertsch (XG) ■ 23: LPM effects for Exact Matrix Element (new) + Gunion-Bertsch (XG)
13Shear & Bulk viscosity of QGP in PQCD
Qun Wang/USTC/China 14
Boltzmann equation for gluon plasma Boltzmann equation for gluon plasma
Numerical results: Numerical results: ζζ for for 22+2322+23
Chen, Deng, Dong, QW, arXiv:1107.0522
28Shear & Bulk viscosity of QGP in PQCD
Qun Wang/USTC/China 29
Comparison of Comparison of ζζ and and ηη
Chen, Deng, Dong, QW, arXiv:1107.0522
Weinberg, Astrophys. J. 168, 175 (1971)
29Shear & Bulk viscosity of QGP in PQCD
Qun Wang/USTC/China 30
Comparison with lattice result and dataComparison with lattice result and data
Chen, Deng, Dong, QW, arXiv:1107.0522
30Shear & Bulk viscosity of QGP in PQCD
Qun Wang/USTC/China 31
Why different between XG and AMY?Why different between XG and AMY?
31
1. For gg ↔ gg:
2. The integration can be done by including the symmetry factor 2 if we constrain the phase space to the region to the t-channel,
•We can also carry out the integration over the full phase space of the final state without the symmetry factor
(39)
(40)
(41)
Shear & Bulk viscosity of QGP in PQCD
Qun Wang/USTC/China 3232
1
2
3
4
1
3
4
2
qT →0, q →0, t-channel
qT →0, q → ∞, u-channel
Shear & Bulk viscosity of QGP in PQCD
Qun Wang/USTC/China 33
Why different between XG and AMY?Why different between XG and AMY?
33
A caveat for gg ↔ ggg:
1. GB holds for constrained phase space in CMF:
2. GB has a symmetry for perm (3,4,5) in CMF, there is a symmetry factor for constrained phase space. On the other hand we can put GB out of summation and obtain the full space expression:
(43)
(42)
Shear & Bulk viscosity of QGP in PQCD
Qun Wang/USTC/China 34
Why different between XG and AMY?Why different between XG and AMY?
34
Lesson:
Two ways of integration over final state phase space are equivalent:
1. Use symmetry factor × GB for constrained final state phase space in integration
2. Use GB for full phase space for final state gluons in integration
equivalent
Shear & Bulk viscosity of QGP in PQCD
Qun Wang/USTC/China 35
Why different between XG and AMY?Why different between XG and AMY?
35
Introducing the symmetry factor while integrating over full phase space of final state gluons (= without constraining the phase space) multiple counting !
GB: soft emission (in CM frame) AMY: collinear splitting (in heat bath frame)
Shear & Bulk viscosity of QGP in PQCD
Qun Wang/USTC/China 37
Conclusion and outlookConclusion and outlook
■ We calculate leading order shear and bulk viscosity of gluon plasma in PQCD. EXACT matrix element for 23 process is used for 23 process with m_D as regulator, HTL is used for 22 process.The LPM effects are also included.
■ Our results for shear and bulk viscosities agree with those of Arnold, Moore and Yaffe (AMY) within errors.
■ The difference between AMY’s and XG’s results is clarified. The lesson is to do collisional integration in two equivalent ways: (a) constrained phase space with symmetry factor; (b) full phase space without symmetry factor; otherwise it would lead to multiple counting.
■ The equivalence at LO between AMY’s collinear splitting and GB’s soft gluon bremsstrahlung has been demonstrated.
■ Outlook (undergoing project): (1) Include quark flavor; (2) With chemical potential