Top Banner

of 43

Shared Service Model

Apr 07, 2018

Download

Documents

alantwlai
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • 8/3/2019 Shared Service Model

    1/43

    ESS Face to Face

    February 28th, 2005

  • 8/3/2019 Shared Service Model

    2/43

    Page 2

    Agenda

    > Introduction

    ESS Organization Update

    IT Strategy Communication

    > IT Shared Services - Hugh Sheridan

    > Offshoring, Project SDI - Frank Vastano

    > 2005 Objectives and Themes

    > Merck News

  • 8/3/2019 Shared Service Model

    3/43

    Page 3

    ESS Shared Service Model

    February 27th 2005

  • 8/3/2019 Shared Service Model

    4/43

    Page 4

    2005 Objectives

    > Shared Services IT:

    Complete the implementation of the IT shared services operating model includingorganizational design, service levels, operating procedures and funding model(4Q).

    Realize approximately $750k in operating expense savings through applicationco-location and the elimination of redundant activities (4Q). (Scope: Finance/HRTrans Systems, Owner/Plan: Sheridan, Establish Engineering/Ops capability:

    Piscitello, Id/Effect Opportunities: Lotier/Blair) (stratmap intersection:OPEX/Internal Process)

  • 8/3/2019 Shared Service Model

    5/43

    Page 5

    Value Proposition

    Economies of scale through common demandand leveraged knowledge expertise

    ValueProposition

  • 8/3/2019 Shared Service Model

    6/43

  • 8/3/2019 Shared Service Model

    7/43Page 7

    If we succeed, how will we look to the corporation as a whole?(How will Merck assess our contribution to its success?)

    Drive EfficienciesManage InvestmentStrategic IT

    FocusedUse of Assets

    OptimizedCost Structure

    Optimized

    High Value/HighReturn Initiatives

    Focused

    IT Strategy Map Strategic End State

    FinancialPerspective

    InternalProcess

    Perspective

    CustomerPerspective

    OrganizationalCapabilitiesPerspective

    DriveInnovation

    Deliver BusinessValue

    Operate withExcellence

    ManageRisk

    To satisfy our customers and the corporation as a whole,at which processes must we excel?

    To achieve our vision, how must we look to our customers?(How will our customers understand our contribution?)

    To achieve our vision, what capabilities must we put in place?

    IntegralPartner

    Business-

    Driven

    TrustedValue-Driven& Innovative

    Worldwide Service Attributes

    Cost-Effective

    Quality

    Focused

    Predictable,Reliable &

    Responsive

    Relationship Image

    Continuous Improvement

    BreakthroughOpportunities

    Regulatory &Compliance

    End-to-End

    ServiceDelivery

    Portfolio &Governance

    Architecture &

    InformationManagement

    Adaptability and Diversity

    LeadershipEngineering &

    Operational DisciplineBusiness &

    Technical AcumenInnovative Thinking

    Strategy

  • 8/3/2019 Shared Service Model

    8/43Page 8

    Shared Services Benefits

    Benefits Business Clients ESS

    Budget Financial Savings Cost Efficiencies

    Quality of service High Service Quality Reuse and Integration

    Delivery time-to-market Time savings Time Efficiencies

    Benefits

  • 8/3/2019 Shared Service Model

    9/43Page 9

    Benefits Realization

    Financial Savings and cost efficiencies

    Benefits

    Year Activity Savings Status

    2005 HRIS Integration 600K Completed

    2005 Finance SLAs and SOPs 550K In Progress

    2005 PeopleSoft Payroll Puerto Rico 100K In Progress

    2005 JDE North America consolidation 300K In Progress

    2005 Global JDE Licensing Optimization 200-400K In Progress

    2005 Document Management SharedServices

    300K Planned

    2006 PeopleSoft Payroll US 500K Planned

    2006 PeopleSoft Banyu integration 100K Planned

  • 8/3/2019 Shared Service Model

    10/43Page 10

    Organization Models (Industry Trends)

    Basic Model Marketplace Model Advanced Market

    Place Model

    Independent

    Business Model

    * Consolidation oftransactional andadministrative work

    * Includes professionaland advisoryservices

    * Client choice ofsupplier

    * Separate businessentity

    * Focus on economiesof scale

    * Separatesgovernance and

    service functions

    * Market based pricing * Profit is retained

    * Services charged outto recover fullyloaded costs

    * Services charged torecover fullyloaded costs

    * Possible externalsales if surpluscapacity

    * Multipleorganizations ascustomers

    * Objective is to reduce

    costs andstandardizeprocesses

    * Objective is to reduce

    costs and improveservice quality

    * Objective to provide

    clients choice ofmost cost effectivesupplier

    * Objective is to

    generate revenueand profits forservice company

    Hybrid Approach

    OrganizationModel

    2007

  • 8/3/2019 Shared Service Model

    11/43

    Page 11

    ESS Professional Services Operating Model

    ClientsESS

    SharedServicesAccount

    ManagementProgram

    Management

    Integration ManagementOffice

    GIShared

    Services

    IT Shared Services

  • 8/3/2019 Shared Service Model

    12/43

    Page 12

    E

    nterpriseArchitecture

    IT Process Management

    Global InfrastructureESS

    Business

    Corporate Functions

    Legal/PA ProcurementFinance HR

    Business Divisions

    MRL MMD HH

    Operating Model

    Define&R

    efine

    Services

    Build

    Services

    Division IT

    HHRIS A&IT

    Architecture Services

    Corporate

    Run

    Services

    Manage GI Strategy

    Su

    pport

    Relationship

    Management

    Prog.

    Mgmt.,

    Engineering&

    ImplementationClient Services

    Application Services

    (Development & Maintenance)

    OrganizationModel

  • 8/3/2019 Shared Service Model

    13/43

    Page 13

    ESS Organization Structure

    InformationManagement

    Services

    ApplicationServices

    ArchitectureServices

    Client Services

    HR

    Client Services

    Finance, Global

    Procurement, Legal,IS & Public Affairs

    ESS

    Services

    BusinessRelationships Account /

    DemandManagement PortfolioManagement Businessanalyst

    BusinessRelationships Account /

    DemandManagement PortfolioManagement Businessanalyst

    Application andInformationArchitecture

    Architecturalstrategy andplan

    ProjectManagement

    ApplicationEngineering(inc webapplication & IMdevelopment)

    ApplicationSupport

    ServiceManagement

    Policies &Procedures Standards

    development Usageguidelines Training &Education Enterprise IMrequirements IM Strategyand planning

    Enterprisereferenceconsultation IM InnovationConsultation

    Financialmanagement Comm.

    HumanResourcesAdministrationprocesses Measurementand Reporting

    OrganizationModel

  • 8/3/2019 Shared Service Model

    14/43

    Page 14

    Shared Service Model Services

    Enterprise Information Management Services

    Enterprise Client Services

    ESS Architecture Services

    Enterprise Application Services (Engineering and Support)

    ESS Project Services

    ESS Integration Services

    External Shared Services

    ESS Internal Shared Services

    Enterprise Decision Support Services

    Services

    3Q05

    In Progress

  • 8/3/2019 Shared Service Model

    15/43

    Page 15

    External Shared Service Definition

    > Responsible for partnering with therelevant clients. This includedparticipating in Strategic Planningprocess and aligning IT and clientstrategies, as well as supporting

    Portfolio management processes

    > Responsible for development androllout of informationmanagement strategies forCorporate and Business Divisionsclients. This includes

    development of an informationmanagement culture, enabled by

    deployment of commonstandards, policies andprocedures, usage guidelines,training and education

    Services

    Client Services Information Management Services

  • 8/3/2019 Shared Service Model

    16/43

    Page 16

    External Shared Service Definition

    > Responsible for management,development and support of allnew applications / enhancements.Applications include enterpriseand corporate application, webbased applications and

    information managementproducts. Project Managers willbe deployed to define, manageand deliver projects. ServiceManagers will provide specificproduct / service expertise and beresponsible for delivery of service

    as defined in Service LevelAgreements

    > Responsible for providingconsistent and reliable decisionsupport reporting services toensure the integrity, operabilityand availability of Mercks

    information asset.> Responsible for supporting the

    design and development of datawarehouses and the necessarysupporting data marts.

    > Responsible for supporting the

    integration of Mercks informationacross these data marts into thereporting solutions

    Services

    Application Services Decision Support Services

  • 8/3/2019 Shared Service Model

    17/43

    Page 17

    Internal Shared Service Definition

    > Responsible for managementof Application and InformationArchitecture. This will includedeveloping a architecturalstrategy and plan in response

    to changes in business orfunctional strategies.

    Responsible for providing policies,procedures, reusable assets andspecific solutions in support ofMercks enterprise integrationneeds.

    Services

    Architecture Services Integration Services

  • 8/3/2019 Shared Service Model

    18/43

    Page 18

    Internal Shared Service Definition

    > Responsible for managing and deploying shared compliance, system testing,release management and resourcing (staffing) services to ESS Projects.Compliance will be monitored according to both regulatory and internal Merckrequirements. Release Management is the coordination of the overall releaseof new technologies / functionalities. Resource Managers will

    administratively manage and deploy resources from a single resource pool.Deployment will be based on matching resource competency with clientdemand. Resource managers will not be responsible for formal staff(performance / development) management functions

    Services

    Project Services

  • 8/3/2019 Shared Service Model

    19/43

    Page 19

    Shared Services Next Steps

    > Professional Services Phase Two

    > Enhanced Service Definitions

    > Global Infrastructure Integration

    > Detailed Consolidation Plans

  • 8/3/2019 Shared Service Model

    20/43

    Page 20

    Professional Services Implementation Team Members

    > Bisschops, Marcel;

    > Callahan, Brian T;> D'Angelo, Dawn M.;

    > Griggs, Ken;

    > Hsi, Amy;

    > Hsiou, Yu;

    > Kamel, Sherif;

    > Mure, Michael;

    > Sa, Vilma;

    > Schwab, Rosanne C

    > Semanchik, Scott M.;> Sheridan, Hugh

    > Vastano, Frank L.;

    Assess

    Recommend

    Enhance

  • 8/3/2019 Shared Service Model

    21/43

    Page 21

    PSM Implementation Team Meeting Outcome

    > Assess education/skill relevant to role

    > Invest in team building

    > Capture lessons learned and develop action plans (continuous process

    improvement)

    > Define workflows by projects in relation to project size and roles

    > Work with Global Infrastructure to strengthen integration points

    > Build and leverage shared service capabilities (testing, PMO,)

  • 8/3/2019 Shared Service Model

    22/43

    Page 22

    Proposed Development Team Structure

    ESSClient

    AM/PM

    PM/Dev

    ESSClient

    AM/PM

    PM

    Architect

    DevTeam

    ESSClient

    AM/PM

    PM

    Architect

    DevTeam

    TL

    BA

    X-Small Small Medium

    GI GI GI

    BA

    DevTeam

    TL

  • 8/3/2019 Shared Service Model

    23/43

    Page 23

    Proposed Development Team Structure

    ESS

    Client

    AM

    PrgM Architect

    DevTeam

    TL

    BA

    Large Program

    PMPMPM

    DevTeam

    TL

    DevTeam

    TL

    GI

  • 8/3/2019 Shared Service Model

    24/43

    Page 24

    Proposed Operations Team Structure

    ESSClient

    PrM

    OpsTeam

    ArchitectGI

  • 8/3/2019 Shared Service Model

    25/43

    Page 25

    If You Have Questions About PSM

    Talk to any

    of the PSM Reps

  • 8/3/2019 Shared Service Model

    26/43

    Enterprise Systems & Services (ESS)

    IT Off-Shoring & Project SDI

    How Does It Impact ESS?

    February 28, 2005

  • 8/3/2019 Shared Service Model

    27/43

    Page 27

    Off-Shoring Project SDI

    What Is Project SDI?1

    2

    How Does SDI Support Career Development In ESS?

    4 Project SDINext Steps

    How Does SDI Support The ESS PSM?

    3

  • 8/3/2019 Shared Service Model

    28/43

    Page 28

    Mercks Goals For Off-Shoring

  • 8/3/2019 Shared Service Model

    29/43

    Page 29

    Pharma Industry Is Getting Aggressive About Offshoring

    Source: McKinsey research; expert interviews

    Activities

    Applications for mainframe,AS/400, Lotus Notes, Domino,

    SAP

    Data management for clinicaltrials

    IT systems management

    Location

    India

    India

    Vendor

    Tata ConsultancyServices (TCS)

    Satyam

    Comments

    400-700 FTEs in IT worldwideby beginning 2006

    Dedicated offshoredevelopment center

    Applications maintenance anddevelopment for selectapplications

    India mPhasis

    Application managementservices

    India Infosys

    mPhasis

    Dedicated offshoredevelopment center forapplication management

    Systems development,maintenance and support

    Montevideo(Uruguay)

    Tata ConsultancyServices (TCS)

    Data management for clinical

    trials

    India Accenture

    Application development and

    maintenance

    TBD TBD

    20 million of IT services TBD TBD

    Top 10Pharma - 1

    Top 10

    Pharma - 7

    Top 10Pharma - 5

    Top 10Pharma - 4

    Top 10

    Pharma - 2

    Top 10Pharma - 3

    Top 10Pharma - 6

  • 8/3/2019 Shared Service Model

    30/43

    Page 30

    Pharma Industry Leveraging IT Offshoring

    Activities Offshored Location Operating Model

    Source: Press research, expert interviews

    Application management India mPhasiS

    Dedicated offshoredevelopment center forApplication managementservices

    Application

    India Infosys

    Dedicated offshoredevelopment center

    Applications for mainframe,AS/400, Lotus Notes,

    Domino, SAP

    Data management forclinical trials

    India TCS

    Systems development,maintenance andoutsourcing

    Montevideo

    (Uruguay)

    TCS

    IT systems management India Satyam

    Vendor

    Outsourced

    Outsourced

    OutsourcedIndia mPhasiS

    Outsourced

    Outsourced

    Outsourced

    http://www.jnj.com/index.jsp;jsessionid=PCNYPVRVYMDZ2CQPCCGSZOYKB2IIQNSChttp://www.pfizer.com/main.html
  • 8/3/2019 Shared Service Model

    31/43

    Page 31

    Project SDI (Systems Development India)

    A project team was appointed (Terry Jacklin, Fred Puelle, Nick Riccio, and Frank Vastano)by the ISLT in November, 2004 to review work completed earlier in the year that identifiedopportunities to shift Merck IT spend to more strategic initiatives

    An approach was designed, with the help of McKinsey consultants, to focus on commodityactivities that are being performed by contractors and project-based vendors

    An implementation plan was developed that properly balances savings realization and

    risks by setting forth an aggressive vendor selection timeline, but allowing sufficient time forknowledge transfer and dual operations

    Target spend was identified in ESS, USHH, MMD, and Infrastructure (DBAs) that could beoffshored to realize $2.8 to 5.1 million of expense savings in 2005

    Nine vendors were engaged to bid on an RFP that was issued on January 10, 2005, whichused a modular structure to enable the selection of 2-3 vendors for the initiative

    Vendor selection is targeted for March 7, 2005

  • 8/3/2019 Shared Service Model

    32/43

    Page 32

    Focus Of Current Effort

    Identified 2.8-5.1 incontractor expense savings

    Need to identify additionalopportunities in thiscategory

    Later we would look toexpand into capital work

    Capital Expense

    Contractor

    Employee

    ~100

    Labor spend, $ Millions

    ~50

    Focus to date

    ~90

    ~275

    Additional opportunity to

    investigate

  • 8/3/2019 Shared Service Model

    33/43

  • 8/3/2019 Shared Service Model

    34/43

    Page 34

    RFP Module Definition

    >Module >ESS >USHH >MMD-A&IT>InfrastructureDBA >Total

    FTEs

    Web Support: 4.5

    Web Dev: 16

    20.5>Web Dev/

    Support

    Project Charlotte:20

    Sales PortfolioTesting: 30

    50

    >Testing

    CIM: 6 EZ-Buy: 4 Finance: 3.2

    HR: 16

    29.2

    >ESS

    Helpdesk: 34 34>USHHHelpdesk

    PortfolioApplicationsSupport: 60*

    60*>USHHSupport

    MMS Impact: 3

    QRIS LIMS: 4

    DBA: 7 14>MMD/Infrastructure

    69.7 124 7 7 207.7Total

  • 8/3/2019 Shared Service Model

    35/43

    Page 35

    What Is Project SDI?1

    2

    How Does SDI Support Career Development In ESS?

    4 Project SDINext Steps

    How Does SDI Support The ESS PSM?

    3

    Off-Shoring Project SDI

    Th ESS P f i l S i M d l

  • 8/3/2019 Shared Service Model

    36/43

    Page 36

    The ESS Professional ServicesModel

    ESS Professional Services Roles: Account Managers Program Managers

    Resource Managers

    Account

    Man

    ager

    ESS CentersOf Excellence

    Technology

    Contractors

    Other MerckCenters OfExcellence

    PackageVendors

    OffshoreVendors

    ProgramManager #1

    ProgramManager #2

    Budget Planning

    Day-To-DayActivities

    OrganizationalSupport

    Large CapitalProjects

    Small Projects(Capital OrExpense)

    CLIENT

    Concept Requirements Design Construction Installation Operation Retirement

    Project SDI

    Candidate

  • 8/3/2019 Shared Service Model

    37/43

    Page 37

    Recent Activities1

    2

    How Does SDI Support Career Development In ESS?

    4 Project SDINext Steps

    Current Vendor Ranking

    3

    Off-Shoring Project SDI

    C Pl f O i i l T i i (Ph I)

  • 8/3/2019 Shared Service Model

    38/43

    Page 38

    Common Platform Organizational Transition (Phase I)Professional Services Model

    (PSM)

    Portfolio Management Model(PMM)

    Operational Support Common Platform Development

    Grade 4

    Grade 5

    Grade 6

    Grades 7-9

    Grade 4

    Grade 5

    Grade 6

    Grades 7-9

    50%

    30%

    Concept & Requirements

    Promotions

    Contractors

    Project SDI

    Candidate

    C Pl f O i i l T i i (Ph II)

  • 8/3/2019 Shared Service Model

    39/43

    Page 39

    Common Platform Organizational Transition (Phase II)Professional Services Model

    (PSM)

    Portfolio Management Model(PMM)

    Operational Support Common Platform Development

    Grade 4

    Grade 5

    Grade 6

    Grades 7-9

    Grade 4

    Grade 5

    Grade 6

    Grades 7-9

    StrategicOutsourcing

    Design & Development

    Project SDI

    Candidate

    Off Sh i P j t SDI

  • 8/3/2019 Shared Service Model

    40/43

    Page 40

    Recent Activities1

    2

    Preliminary Financial Analysis

    4 Project SDINext Steps

    Current Vendor Ranking

    3

    Off-Shoring Project SDI

    Project SDI Next Steps

  • 8/3/2019 Shared Service Model

    41/43

    Page 41

    Project SDI Next Steps

    > March 2, 2005 Team Decision Meeting &

    Reference Calls

    > March 3, 2005 Recommendation Memo To

    Sponsors

    > March 7, 2005 Decision From Sponsors

    > March 8, 2005 Thru March 9, 2005 Prepare Vendor

    Communication

    > March 10, 2005 Thru March 11, 2005 Announce

    Decision To Vendors> March 12, 2005 Knowledge Transfer Phase Begins

  • 8/3/2019 Shared Service Model

    42/43

    Page 42

    2005 ESS Objectives & Themes

    ESS 2005 Objectives and Themes

  • 8/3/2019 Shared Service Model

    43/43

    ESS 2005 Objectives and Themes

    Deliver Business Value through IT Enabled Solutions

    Finance Transformation

    Merck Production System Common Platform

    Integrated Talent Management and Global Compensation

    MRL CLPA

    Build and Create the ESS Global Shared Services Model

    Enterprise Document Management

    Strategic Sourcing, Project SDI

    ESS and GI Integrated Shared Services Model

    Quality Assurance, Program Management, Metrics, Communication, Change Mgmt

    Simplify and Standardize the Global IT Environment PeopleSoft Banyu Integration, U.S. Payroll and Time/Labor

    EZExpense Upgrade

    Charlotte Technology Center

    Six Sigma Production Environment