Top Banner
SHARED GROWTH AND SHAPING THE PUBLIC REALM RAYMOND ANDREW SIH, UAP, LEED AP
22

SHARED GROWTH SHAPING THE PUBLIC REALMMulti-sensoral urban growth analysis, Manila, Philippines. DLR-DFD, 2010 INNOVATIVE LAND USE & URBAN DESIGN RULES deliberately attempt to shape

Jun 12, 2021

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: SHARED GROWTH SHAPING THE PUBLIC REALMMulti-sensoral urban growth analysis, Manila, Philippines. DLR-DFD, 2010 INNOVATIVE LAND USE & URBAN DESIGN RULES deliberately attempt to shape

SHARED GROWTH AND SHAPING THE PUBLIC REALM

RAYMOND ANDREW SIH, UAP, LEED AP

Page 2: SHARED GROWTH SHAPING THE PUBLIC REALMMulti-sensoral urban growth analysis, Manila, Philippines. DLR-DFD, 2010 INNOVATIVE LAND USE & URBAN DESIGN RULES deliberately attempt to shape

“We shape our dwellings, and afterwards our dwellings shape us.” Winston Churchill

Old Chamber of the House Of Commons, UK New House of Commons, UK

Page 3: SHARED GROWTH SHAPING THE PUBLIC REALMMulti-sensoral urban growth analysis, Manila, Philippines. DLR-DFD, 2010 INNOVATIVE LAND USE & URBAN DESIGN RULES deliberately attempt to shape

The PUBLIC REALM is what gives life to our cities.

EDSA, Guadalupe then EDSA, Guadalupe now

Page 4: SHARED GROWTH SHAPING THE PUBLIC REALMMulti-sensoral urban growth analysis, Manila, Philippines. DLR-DFD, 2010 INNOVATIVE LAND USE & URBAN DESIGN RULES deliberately attempt to shape

RULES AS TOOLS are the Instruments of Design for the public realm.

Grand Urban Rules by Alex Lehnerer

Page 5: SHARED GROWTH SHAPING THE PUBLIC REALMMulti-sensoral urban growth analysis, Manila, Philippines. DLR-DFD, 2010 INNOVATIVE LAND USE & URBAN DESIGN RULES deliberately attempt to shape

CONVENTIONAL ZONING The private developer decides the Highest and Best Use.

Page 6: SHARED GROWTH SHAPING THE PUBLIC REALMMulti-sensoral urban growth analysis, Manila, Philippines. DLR-DFD, 2010 INNOVATIVE LAND USE & URBAN DESIGN RULES deliberately attempt to shape

THE RESULT is Urban Sprawl.

Multi-sensoral urban growth analysis, Manila, Philippines. DLR-DFD, 2010

Page 7: SHARED GROWTH SHAPING THE PUBLIC REALMMulti-sensoral urban growth analysis, Manila, Philippines. DLR-DFD, 2010 INNOVATIVE LAND USE & URBAN DESIGN RULES deliberately attempt to shape

INNOVATIVE LAND USE & URBAN DESIGN RULES

deliberately attempt to shape the city.

Page 8: SHARED GROWTH SHAPING THE PUBLIC REALMMulti-sensoral urban growth analysis, Manila, Philippines. DLR-DFD, 2010 INNOVATIVE LAND USE & URBAN DESIGN RULES deliberately attempt to shape

PEDESTRIANIZATION & PUBLIC TRANSPORT through Pedestrian and Transit Orientation.

Page 9: SHARED GROWTH SHAPING THE PUBLIC REALMMulti-sensoral urban growth analysis, Manila, Philippines. DLR-DFD, 2010 INNOVATIVE LAND USE & URBAN DESIGN RULES deliberately attempt to shape

COMPACT DEVELOPMENT by defining an Urban Growth Boundary.

Page 10: SHARED GROWTH SHAPING THE PUBLIC REALMMulti-sensoral urban growth analysis, Manila, Philippines. DLR-DFD, 2010 INNOVATIVE LAND USE & URBAN DESIGN RULES deliberately attempt to shape

VIBRANT STREETS by allowing Mixed Uses.

COMMERCIAL RETAIL

COMMERCIAL OFFICE

RESIDENTIAL

Page 11: SHARED GROWTH SHAPING THE PUBLIC REALMMulti-sensoral urban growth analysis, Manila, Philippines. DLR-DFD, 2010 INNOVATIVE LAND USE & URBAN DESIGN RULES deliberately attempt to shape

CONNECT INCOMPATIBLE USES through Transition Zoning.

Page 12: SHARED GROWTH SHAPING THE PUBLIC REALMMulti-sensoral urban growth analysis, Manila, Philippines. DLR-DFD, 2010 INNOVATIVE LAND USE & URBAN DESIGN RULES deliberately attempt to shape

STRENGTHEN NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER through design standards and neighborhood compatibility.

DISCOURAGED

ENCOURAGED

Page 13: SHARED GROWTH SHAPING THE PUBLIC REALMMulti-sensoral urban growth analysis, Manila, Philippines. DLR-DFD, 2010 INNOVATIVE LAND USE & URBAN DESIGN RULES deliberately attempt to shape

ENCOURAGING PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY through Facade Zones.

Page 14: SHARED GROWTH SHAPING THE PUBLIC REALMMulti-sensoral urban growth analysis, Manila, Philippines. DLR-DFD, 2010 INNOVATIVE LAND USE & URBAN DESIGN RULES deliberately attempt to shape

MORE GREEN OPEN SPACES through Setbacks, Open Spaces, and Yards.

Page 15: SHARED GROWTH SHAPING THE PUBLIC REALMMulti-sensoral urban growth analysis, Manila, Philippines. DLR-DFD, 2010 INNOVATIVE LAND USE & URBAN DESIGN RULES deliberately attempt to shape

CONTROL VEHICULAR ACCESS with limits on Street Parking, Driveways and Curb Cuts.

Driveways and Curb Cuts. New York City.

Page 16: SHARED GROWTH SHAPING THE PUBLIC REALMMulti-sensoral urban growth analysis, Manila, Philippines. DLR-DFD, 2010 INNOVATIVE LAND USE & URBAN DESIGN RULES deliberately attempt to shape

REVITALIZE OR PRESERVE NEIGHBORHOODS by easing or lowering Height Restrictions.

Page 17: SHARED GROWTH SHAPING THE PUBLIC REALMMulti-sensoral urban growth analysis, Manila, Philippines. DLR-DFD, 2010 INNOVATIVE LAND USE & URBAN DESIGN RULES deliberately attempt to shape

CONTROL DEVELOPMENT DENSITY & HEIGHTthrough Floor Area Ratio.

Page 18: SHARED GROWTH SHAPING THE PUBLIC REALMMulti-sensoral urban growth analysis, Manila, Philippines. DLR-DFD, 2010 INNOVATIVE LAND USE & URBAN DESIGN RULES deliberately attempt to shape

PRESERVE LAND, WETLAND & AIR SPACEwith Transfer Development Rights.

Page 19: SHARED GROWTH SHAPING THE PUBLIC REALMMulti-sensoral urban growth analysis, Manila, Philippines. DLR-DFD, 2010 INNOVATIVE LAND USE & URBAN DESIGN RULES deliberately attempt to shape

PRESERVE LANDSCAPE FEATURES & VIEWSwith Preservation Rules.

Mulholland Drive Viewshed. Los Angeles City.

Page 20: SHARED GROWTH SHAPING THE PUBLIC REALMMulti-sensoral urban growth analysis, Manila, Philippines. DLR-DFD, 2010 INNOVATIVE LAND USE & URBAN DESIGN RULES deliberately attempt to shape

SHAPE DEVELOPMENTwith an Urban Envelope.

Seattle Urban Envelope. Downtown Urban Center Planning Group, 1999

Page 21: SHARED GROWTH SHAPING THE PUBLIC REALMMulti-sensoral urban growth analysis, Manila, Philippines. DLR-DFD, 2010 INNOVATIVE LAND USE & URBAN DESIGN RULES deliberately attempt to shape

OPTION ONE

501 CONDOS486 MULTI-FAMILY TOWNHOUSES352 SINGLE FAMILY TOWNHOUSES143 SINGLE FAMILY HOMES1482 = TOTAL UNITS

OPTION TWO

501 CONDOS486 MULTI-FAMILY TOWNHOUSES385 SINGLE FAMILY TOWNHOUSES118 SINGLE FAMILY HOMES1490 = TOTAL UNITS

TOWNHOUSEWITH

PENNSAFISHERMAN’S

PENNSAUKEN, NEW JER

ROBERT A.M. STERN ARCHITEC

SHAPE BUILDINGS and COMMUNITIES with Form-based Codes where physical form dictates use.

Fisherman’s Point _Pennsauken Design Guidelines

TOWNHOUSES

URBAN DESIGN FRAMEWORK

Front Porch Zone

Rear Yard / Garage

Alley

Front Porch Zone

Rear Yard / Garage

3-4 Story TownhouseLot Development Area

Front Porch Zone

Rear Yard / Garage

Alley

3-4 Story Townhouse Lot Development Area

3-4 Story TownhouseLot Development Area

Front Yard

Garage with Terrace

Mid BlockBreak/Gate

CornerMain BodyMain BodyCornerCornerMain BodyCorner

BuildingEntry

BLOCK tYPE BBLOCK tYPE A

AlleyEntry

End Wall

sELECtED tERMinOLOGY

Building Entries at street level from are required on all Facades which front onto streets

Alley Entries should be narrowed with a low fence, wall or planting. Thus indicating their semi-private nature.

the Main Body facades should be organized in a rhythmic manner . Bay windows and balconies should be placed at choherent intervals providing variety and interest along the street frontage.

Mid Block Break / Gates should be placed in the center or symmetrically mirrored off the center of a block as shown in Block Type B.

Corners should be articulated and address both street edges which they front onto. This can be achieved by providing an entrance on the side facade at street level.Fenestration, balconies, bay windows and porches are encouraged on side facades to articulate the corner.

BLOCK tYPE A shows where the side elevation of a Corner 3-4 storey Townhouse and the front elevation of a Corner are mirrored at both ends of the block while the Main Body is broken with an Alley Entry.Due to the similar treatment of both Corners,the reading is of a whole block.

BLOCK tYPE B features a symmetrical massing in which identical Main Body and Corner townhouses are mirrored about the center of the block.

BLOCK tYPE A & B adjacent to each other read as a coherent street facade due to their similar massing and massing treatment.

Street Street Street

ZOninG DiAGRAM(as per amendment)

MAssinG DiAGRAM

Rear YardSetback

side Yardsetback

Front Yardset-BackFront PorchSet-Back

Front Yard

2-3 Storey Townhouse

Lot Dev Area

FrontPorch Zone

Rear Yard / Garage

Apron

Fisherman’s Point _Pennsauken Design Guidelines

TOWNHOUSES

URBAN DESIGN FRAMEWORK

Front Porch Zone

Rear Yard / Garage

Alley

Front Porch Zone

Rear Yard / Garage

3-4 Story TownhouseLot Development Area

Front Porch Zone

Rear Yard / Garage

Alley

3-4 Story Townhouse Lot Development Area

3-4 Story TownhouseLot Development Area

Front Yard

Garage with Terrace

Mid BlockBreak/Gate

CornerMain BodyMain BodyCornerCornerMain BodyCorner

BuildingEntry

BLOCK tYPE BBLOCK tYPE A

AlleyEntry

End Wall

sELECtED tERMinOLOGY

Building Entries at street level from are required on all Facades which front onto streets

Alley Entries should be narrowed with a low fence, wall or planting. Thus indicating their semi-private nature.

the Main Body facades should be organized in a rhythmic manner . Bay windows and balconies should be placed at choherent intervals providing variety and interest along the street frontage.

Mid Block Break / Gates should be placed in the center or symmetrically mirrored off the center of a block as shown in Block Type B.

Corners should be articulated and address both street edges which they front onto. This can be achieved by providing an entrance on the side facade at street level.Fenestration, balconies, bay windows and porches are encouraged on side facades to articulate the corner.

BLOCK tYPE A shows where the side elevation of a Corner 3-4 storey Townhouse and the front elevation of a Corner are mirrored at both ends of the block while the Main Body is broken with an Alley Entry.Due to the similar treatment of both Corners,the reading is of a whole block.

BLOCK tYPE B features a symmetrical massing in which identical Main Body and Corner townhouses are mirrored about the center of the block.

BLOCK tYPE A & B adjacent to each other read as a coherent street facade due to their similar massing and massing treatment.

Street Street Street

ZOninG DiAGRAM(as per amendment)

MAssinG DiAGRAM

Rear YardSetback

side Yardsetback

Front Yardset-BackFront PorchSet-Back

Front Yard

2-3 Storey Townhouse

Lot Dev Area

FrontPorch Zone

Rear Yard / Garage

Apron

Page 22: SHARED GROWTH SHAPING THE PUBLIC REALMMulti-sensoral urban growth analysis, Manila, Philippines. DLR-DFD, 2010 INNOVATIVE LAND USE & URBAN DESIGN RULES deliberately attempt to shape

For your consideration.THANK YOU