Top Banner
A Combined Radar-Radiometer A Combined Radar-Radiometer Approach to Estimate Rain Approach to Estimate Rain Rate Profile and Underlying Rate Profile and Underlying Surface Wind Speed over the Surface Wind Speed over the Ocean Ocean Shannon Brown and Christopher Shannon Brown and Christopher Ruf Ruf University of Michigan University of Michigan 26 October 2004 26 October 2004 College of Engineering Space Physics Research Laboratory Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic & Space Sciences
20

Shannon Brown and Christopher Ruf University of Michigan 26 October 2004

Jan 11, 2016

Download

Documents

PHAM PHAM

College of Engineering Space Physics Research Laboratory Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic & Space Sciences. A Combined Radar-Radiometer Approach to Estimate Rain Rate Profile and Underlying Surface Wind Speed over the Ocean. Shannon Brown and Christopher Ruf University of Michigan - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Shannon Brown and Christopher Ruf University of Michigan 26 October 2004

A Combined Radar-Radiometer Approach A Combined Radar-Radiometer Approach to Estimate Rain Rate Profile and to Estimate Rain Rate Profile and

Underlying Surface Wind Speed over the Underlying Surface Wind Speed over the OceanOcean

Shannon Brown and Shannon Brown and Christopher RufChristopher Ruf

University of MichiganUniversity of Michigan

26 October 200426 October 2004

College of EngineeringSpace Physics Research Laboratory

Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic & Space Sciences

Page 2: Shannon Brown and Christopher Ruf University of Michigan 26 October 2004

Brown and Ruf, 26 October 2004 2 of 19

IntroductionIntroduction

• Pacific Field Campaign– LRR-X 10.7 GHz radiometer

– PR-2 13.4 and 35.6 GHz Doppler radar

• Algorithm Overview• Retrieval in stratiform rain

– Effect of melting layer model

Page 3: Shannon Brown and Christopher Ruf University of Michigan 26 October 2004

Brown and Ruf, 26 October 2004 3 of 19

LRR-X – Synthetic Thinned Aperture LRR-X – Synthetic Thinned Aperture RadiometerRadiometer

Visible Camera

LRR

• Point Reyes National Seashore, CA– DC-8 nadir video camera (left)– LRR-X TB image at 10.7 GHz, H-Pol (right)

• LRR-X Specifications– Synthetic aperture 1 meter2; Cross-track imaging– Spatial res @ 11 km altitude

• 381 x 466 m (nadir); 1079 x 629 m (45o cross track)

– NET of 0.3 K

Page 4: Shannon Brown and Christopher Ruf University of Michigan 26 October 2004

Brown and Ruf, 26 October 2004 4 of 19

PR-2 – Dual Frequency Doppler RadarPR-2 – Dual Frequency Doppler Radar

• Operates at 13.4 and 35.6 GHz

• Scans cross-track to + 25o

• 37 m vertical resolution

• 800 m horizontal resolution

Page 5: Shannon Brown and Christopher Ruf University of Michigan 26 October 2004

Brown and Ruf, 26 October 2004 5 of 19

June 13, 2003 Pacific Field CampaignJune 13, 2003 Pacific Field Campaign

VisibleIR

Flight Path

Page 6: Shannon Brown and Christopher Ruf University of Michigan 26 October 2004

Brown and Ruf, 26 October 2004 6 of 19

Algorithm BasisAlgorithm Basis

• Physically based algorithm • Easily adaptable to multi-instrument platforms• Use radar to determine DSD

– Iteratively solve for two parameters of Gamma DSD at each range gate

– Determine RR(z) and W(z) from DSD(z)

• Use DSD and TB to determine wind speed– Determine absorption and extinction profile from DSD

– Remove atmospheric component to determine surface emissivity

Page 7: Shannon Brown and Christopher Ruf University of Michigan 26 October 2004

Brown and Ruf, 26 October 2004 7 of 19

Stratiform RetrievalsStratiform Retrievals

• Radiometric retrieval in light stratiform rain driven by absorption in the melting layer– Passive rain retrieval

– Surface parameter retrieval

1500 m

Page 8: Shannon Brown and Christopher Ruf University of Michigan 26 October 2004

Brown and Ruf, 26 October 2004 8 of 19

Stratiform RetrievalsStratiform Retrievals

• (Bottom left) Retrieved wind speed without Melting Layer

• (Bottom right) PR-2 retrieved rain rate

Page 9: Shannon Brown and Christopher Ruf University of Michigan 26 October 2004

Brown and Ruf, 26 October 2004 9 of 19

Melting Model AnalysisMelting Model Analysis

• Choose melting layer model based on fit to PR-2 data

• Apply to radiometric retrieval• Thermodynamic model from Mitra et al. 1990

– Ventilation coefficient

– Initial snow density

– Electromagnetic model

Page 10: Shannon Brown and Christopher Ruf University of Michigan 26 October 2004

Brown and Ruf, 26 October 2004 10 of 19

Electromagnetic ModelsElectromagnetic Models

Maxwell-Garnett Dielectric Model

Water | { air inclusions in ice matrix}

{ice inclusions water matrix} | air

air | {ice inclusions water matrix}

{air inclusions in ice matrix} | water

Strongest

Weakest

absorption

scattering

Fabry-Szyrmer Core-Shell

Meneghini and Liao

Page 11: Shannon Brown and Christopher Ruf University of Michigan 26 October 2004

Brown and Ruf, 26 October 2004 11 of 19

Fitting ProcedureFitting Procedure

• Assume particle mass conservation • Stationary assumption

• Lapse rate set to 7.7 K/km (from RaOb)• RH assumed to be 100 %

)(/)()()( DVDVDNDN mwwm

Page 12: Shannon Brown and Christopher Ruf University of Michigan 26 October 2004

Brown and Ruf, 26 October 2004 12 of 19

Fitting ProcedureFitting Procedure

• Analyzed ~ 100 profiles with basal reflectivities of 25 – 31 dBZ

Base of Melting Layer Reflectivity Peak in Melting Layer

Page 13: Shannon Brown and Christopher Ruf University of Michigan 26 October 2004

Brown and Ruf, 26 October 2004 13 of 19

Fitting ProcedureFitting Procedure

Estimate D0 from dBZm(13.4) using average N0

Melting Layer Model

(Fm, ρs, εm)

N0init, D0

init, μ

Attenuation Correction

τ melt(13.4), τmelt (35.6)

Estimate N0, D0

dBZ(13.4), dBZ(35.6)

Melting Layer Model

(Fm, ρs, εm)N0, D0, μ

Page 14: Shannon Brown and Christopher Ruf University of Michigan 26 October 2004

Brown and Ruf, 26 October 2004 14 of 19

Fitting ProcedureFitting Procedure

1. {ice inclusions water matrix} | air

2. Fabry-Szyrmer Core(1)-Shell(3)

3. air | {ice inclusions water matrix}

Page 15: Shannon Brown and Christopher Ruf University of Michigan 26 October 2004

Brown and Ruf, 26 October 2004 15 of 19

Melting Model AnalysisMelting Model Analysis

Dielectric Formula 13.4 Peak Bias

(dB)

35.6 Peak Bias (dB)

13.4 Width Dif. (dB)

Fraction of Opacity

Mean Wind Speed

(1) Water | { air inclusions in ice matrix}

5.2 3.1 1.4 0.72 0.03

(2) {ice inclusions water matrix} | air

3.8 2.5 1.0* 0.66 0.63

(3) Fabry-Szyrmer Core-Shell

-0.3 0.23* 0.37 0.45 9.9

(4) air | {ice inclusions water matrix}

-1.1 0.43 -0.23 0.43 10.3

(5) {air inclusions in ice matrix} | water

-2.3 0.54* -0.52 0.32 12.1

Page 16: Shannon Brown and Christopher Ruf University of Michigan 26 October 2004

Brown and Ruf, 26 October 2004 16 of 19

Melting LayerMelting Layer

• Combination of MG models fits PR-2 data well– FS core shell

• Snow density model – lowest retrieval error in snow layer produces best fit in melting layer– FS model most sensitive to snow density variations

– ~ 2K variation between different density models/ventilation coefficient

Page 17: Shannon Brown and Christopher Ruf University of Michigan 26 October 2004

Brown and Ruf, 26 October 2004 17 of 19

Effect on RetrievalsEffect on Retrievals

No Melting Layer

FS core shell

Retrieved Rain Rate

Page 18: Shannon Brown and Christopher Ruf University of Michigan 26 October 2004

Brown and Ruf, 26 October 2004 18 of 19

Effect on RetrievalsEffect on Retrievals

• Addition of melting layer reduced the wind speed retrievals by 30 to 40 %

• Increased radar retrieved rain rates approximately 10 %

Fraction of Atmospheric Brightness at 10.7 GHz due to melting layer (FS model)

Page 19: Shannon Brown and Christopher Ruf University of Michigan 26 October 2004

Brown and Ruf, 26 October 2004 19 of 19

ConclusionsConclusions

• Melting layer contributes the majority of the atmospheric absorption in the microwave

• Radiometric retrievals in stratiform rain require an accurate model for the melting layer

• Electromagnetic models which blend MG mixing formulas produce the best results

• FS core shell model fit PR-2 data well and produced reasonable wind speed retrievals

Page 20: Shannon Brown and Christopher Ruf University of Michigan 26 October 2004

Brown and Ruf, 26 October 2004 20 of 19

Algorithm BasisAlgorithm Basis

Radar DataInvert Backscatter

Equation to get DSD(z)

Correct for attenuation

)(

)(

zT

fMb

Mie Theory

),(),,(),,( Hszfzf fp

absp

ext

DSD(z), T(z)),( Hsf

Invert RTE to get

)( h

Invert Surface Emissivity Model to get Wind Speed

),(),,( zfzf pabs

pext

)( h

Radiometer Data

)( fTB

Output RR(z), W(z), WSpd

Ancillary Data (e.g. SST, mv,

ρv)

Brightband Detection get T(z)

dBZ(f), Vr, LDR

)(

)(

zT

fb

DSD(z)

WSpd

),(

),(

zf

zfcabs

gabs

sfcT