Top Banner
1 Sex-specific behavioral syndromes allow the independent evolution of behavioral dimorphism Raphael Royauté 1,2,4 Ann Hedrick 3 Ned A. Dochtermann 2 1 Movement Ecology Group, Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK- F), Frankfurt, Germany (current address) 2 Department of Biological Sciences; North Dakota State University, Fargo, USA 3 Department of Neurobiology, Physiology, and Behavior; University of California, Davis, USA 4 corresponding author: [email protected] Running Title: Sex-specific syndromes and behavioral sexual dimorphism Keywords: Behavioral syndromes, evolutionary constraints, G matrix, personality, behavioral ecology, sexual dimorphism, intralocus sexual conflicts Author Contributions: All authors conceived the project and supervised the gathering of data. R.R conducted behavioral trials and analyzed the data. R.R. wrote the first draft of the manuscript and all authors contributed to subsequent versions. Conflicts of interests: The authors declare no conflict of interests Data Accessibility Statement: All data, code and analyses are available at: https://osf.io/pnug5/ Acknowledgements: We thank Monica Berdal, Katelyn Cannon, Jeremy Dalos, Sarah Felde, 1 Brady Klock, Ishan Joshi, Hannah Lambert, Jenna LaCoursiere and Alondra Neunsinger for 2 assistance in conducting behavioral trials and in rearing and care of the crickets and 3 Martori Farms, David Lightfoot, Scott Bundy, Nico Franz, Sangmi Lee, Cameron Jones, 4 Kenny Chapin, Ti Eriksson, Meranda Feagins, Charlotte Mulloney, Melody Martinez, Allyson 5 Richins, Mauriel Rodriguez, Helen Vessels and David Wikman for assistance in collecting 6 the crickets. We thank for J. Sztepanacz and A.J. Wilson for their advice on statistical 7 analyses and K. Laskowski for comments on an early draft of this manuscript. This work 8 was supported by US NSF IOS grants 1557951 and 1558069 to N.A.D. and A.H. respectively. 9
29

Sex-specific syndromes and behavioral sexual dimorphism

Mar 19, 2023

Download

Documents

Khang Minh
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Sex-specific syndromes and behavioral sexual dimorphism

1

Sex-specificbehavioralsyndromesallowtheindependentevolutionofbehavioraldimorphism

RaphaelRoyauté1,2,4AnnHedrick3

NedA.Dochtermann2

1MovementEcologyGroup,SenckenbergBiodiversityandClimateResearchCentre(SBiK-F),Frankfurt,Germany(currentaddress)2DepartmentofBiologicalSciences;NorthDakotaStateUniversity,Fargo,USA3DepartmentofNeurobiology,Physiology,andBehavior;UniversityofCalifornia,Davis,USA4correspondingauthor:[email protected]:Sex-specificsyndromesandbehavioralsexualdimorphismKeywords:Behavioralsyndromes,evolutionaryconstraints,Gmatrix,personality,behavioralecology,sexualdimorphism,intralocussexualconflictsAuthorContributions:Allauthorsconceivedtheprojectandsupervisedthegatheringofdata.R.Rconductedbehavioraltrialsandanalyzedthedata.R.R.wrotethefirstdraftofthemanuscriptandallauthorscontributedtosubsequentversions.Conflictsofinterests:TheauthorsdeclarenoconflictofinterestsDataAccessibilityStatement:Alldata,codeandanalysesareavailableat:https://osf.io/pnug5/Acknowledgements:WethankMonicaBerdal,KatelynCannon,JeremyDalos,SarahFelde,1

BradyKlock,IshanJoshi,HannahLambert,JennaLaCoursiereandAlondraNeunsingerfor2

assistanceinconductingbehavioraltrialsandinrearingandcareofthecricketsand3

MartoriFarms,DavidLightfoot,ScottBundy,NicoFranz,SangmiLee,CameronJones,4

KennyChapin,TiEriksson,MerandaFeagins,CharlotteMulloney,MelodyMartinez,Allyson5

Richins,MaurielRodriguez,HelenVesselsandDavidWikmanforassistanceincollecting6

thecrickets.WethankforJ.SztepanaczandA.J.Wilsonfortheiradviceonstatistical7

analysesandK.Laskowskiforcommentsonanearlydraftofthismanuscript.Thiswork8

wassupportedbyUSNSFIOSgrants1557951and1558069toN.A.D.andA.H.respectively. 9

Page 2: Sex-specific syndromes and behavioral sexual dimorphism

2

ABSTRACT10

Whenselectiondiffersbysex,thecapacityforsexestoreachoptimalphenotypescanbe11

constrainedbythesharedgenomeofmalesandfemales.Becausephenotypictraitsare12

oftencorrelated,thisdifferenceextendsacrossmultipletraitsandunderlyinggenetic13

correlationscanfurtherconstrainevolutionaryresponses.Behaviorsarefrequently14

correlatedasbehavioralsyndromes,andthesecorrelationsoftenhaveageneticbasis.15

However,whethercross-sexandacrossbehaviorcorrelationsleadtoconstrainedevolution16

remainsunknown.Here,weshowthataboldness-activitysyndromeisstronglysex-17

specificatthegeneticlevelinthewesternfieldcricket(Gryllusinteger)andthatemergence18

fromashelterisgeneticallyindependentbetweenmalesandfemales.However,male19

activityisstronglyrelatedtofemaleshelteremergence,creatingthepotentialforbiased20

responsestoselection.Ourresultsshowthatthesex-specificgeneticarchitectureof21

behavioralsyndromescanshapetheevolutionofbehavioralphenotypes.22

23

Page 3: Sex-specific syndromes and behavioral sexual dimorphism

3

INTRODUCTION24

Malesandfemalessharethesamegenomebutoftenrelyondifferentstrategiestoincrease25

fitness.Thiscanleadtointralocussexualconflictswhereselectionactingonasharedtrait26

displacesonesexfromitsoptimum(HedrickandTemeles1989;Bondurianskyand27

Chenoweth2009).Thissexualconflictisfurthercomplicatedbytheconstrainingpotential28

ofgeneticcorrelations(Lande1980;WalshandBlows2009).Forexample,behaviorsare29

oftencorrelatedascomponentsofabehavioralsyndrome(Sihetal.2004)andthese30

behavioralsyndromeshavethepotentialtoalterevolutionaryoutcomes(Dochtermann31

andDingemanse2013).32

Ingeneral,anysustainedselectionfavoringdifferentoptimabetweensexes,i.e.33

sexuallydiscordantselection,willeventuallyresolvethesexualconflictandattenuate34

geneticconstraintsovertime,thusallowingsexestoevolveindependently(Delphetal.35

2011).Thisconstraintcanbeformallymeasuredasthecross-sexcorrelationcoefficientrmf,36

withvalues<1increasingtherapidityatwhichsexualdimorphismcanevolve.Cross-sex37

correlationsaregenerallylargebuttendtodecreaseinspecieswithstrongersexual38

dimorphism(Poissantetal.2010).Additionalconstraintscanemergewhengeneralizingto39

multiplephenotypesexpressedinmalesandfemalesandtheirinteractions(Lande1980).40

Bydecomposingtheadditivegeneticcovariancematrixintoitssex-specific(Gm,Gf)and41

cross-sexsub-matrices(B),onecanestimateifgeneticcorrelationsacrosssexesandtraits42

createconstrainedevolutionaryoutcomes(Fig.1).43

Thisdecompositionapproachhasbeenusedformorphologicaltraits,revealingthat44

cross-sexcovariances(i.e.theBmatrix,(Lande1980))canprofoundlyaltertheevolution45

ofsexualdimorphism(Gosdenetal.2012;Bergeretal.2014;GosdenandChenoweth46

2014),especiallywhenselectionfavorsdifferentaveragetraitvaluesforeachsex(Long47

andRice2007;Bergeretal.2014).However,theGm,Gf,andBhaverarelybeenestimated48

forbehaviors.Howmuchthegeneticarchitectureofbehavioralsyndromescanaffect49

evolutionaryoutcomesunderintralocussexualconflictremainsunclear.Thisisan50

importantomissionbecausebehaviorfrequentlyimpactsbothsurvivalandfitness(Moiron51

etal.2020)andsexualdimorphismiscommonforbehaviors(Blanckenhorn2005;Aragón52

Page 4: Sex-specific syndromes and behavioral sexual dimorphism

4

2011;Mainwaringetal.2011;Kokrasetal.2012).Despitemanyconceptualargumentsfor53

whybehavioralsyndromesshoulddifferbysexes(Schuettetal.2010;Hämäläinenetal.54

2018;Immonenetal.2018),sex-differencesintheexpressionofbehavioralcorrelations55

arefrequentlyignoredinpractice.Asaresult,thedegreetowhichcross-sexgenetic56

correlationsmightbeshapedbysexualconflictforbehavioralphenotypesremains57

unknownandtheimportanceofthesecorrelationsfortheevolutionofbehaviorsis58

similarlyunknown. 59

Page 5: Sex-specific syndromes and behavioral sexual dimorphism

5

60

Page 6: Sex-specific syndromes and behavioral sexual dimorphism

6

Figure1.Thegeneticarchitectureofcross-sexcorrelationscanhavenon-intuitive61 consequencesonevolutionaryresponsesandsexualdimorphism.A)Highvaluesofcross-62 sexcorrelationsforthesametraits(here,bodysize)indicatethatmaleandfemaleaverages63 arepositivelycorrelatedamongfamilies.B)Thecross-sexcovariancematrix(Gmf)allows64 tocomparepatternsofgeneticcovarianceswithinsexes(herebetweenbodymassand65 bodysize)aswellasunderstandthestrengthofcross-traitcorrelationswithinandamong66 traits.C)Cross-sexcross-traitcorrelation(rmf)canproducenon-intuitiveresponsesto67 selectivepressures.Hereweshow3scenariosindicativeofthevarietyofresponsesto68 selection(Δz)thatcanoccurdependingonthedirectionofselection(β)andthemagnitude69 andorientationofrmf.Theellipsesrepresentthebivariate(co)variationinfemurlength70 andmass,withthepopulationaverageatthevertexofthe(thinsolid)linesindicatingthe71 directionsinbivariatespacewiththemostvariation.Dashedlinesrepresentthedirection72 selection(β)ispushingapopulation’saverageandthesolidthickarrowsshowthe73 directionandmagnitude(arrowtip)ofselectionresponses.InbothscenariosC.1andC.2,74 selectionisconcordant—i.e.actingthesame—betweensexesandmalesandfemaleshave75 thesamefitnessoptimum.InscenarioC.3,selectionissexuallydiscordantandfavors76 increasedsexualdimorphism.ScenarioC.1showsthatstrongcross-sexcrosstrait77 correlationscanbiassexesawayfromtheiroptimum.InscenarioC.2,nullrmfresultsin78 independenttrajectoriesbysexes.InscenarioC.3,theeffectoffathersontheirdaughters’79 phenotypeisoppositeofthatofmother’sontheirsons’,resultinginasymmetricrmfand80 biasedresponsestoselectioninmales. 81

Page 7: Sex-specific syndromes and behavioral sexual dimorphism

7

Intralocussexualconflictshouldbeparticularlystronginthefieldcrickets82

(Gryllidae).Inmanyfieldcrickets,malesandfemalesdifferintheirbehaviorsand83

reproductivestrategies(HedrickandKortet2012).Forexample,femalesexploretheir84

environmentstosamplemateswhilemalesremainatburrowsfromwhichtheysignal85

(FrenchandCade1987).Further,aboldness-activitysyndromehasaconservedgenetic86

basisinatleastonespecies,theWesternstutter-trillingfieldcricket(Gryllusinteger),87

whichseemstohaveconstrainedbehavioraldivergence(Royautéetal.2020).Whetherthis88

syndromeissex-specificiscurrentlyunknownbutthecombinationofconserved89

syndromestogetherwithalackofsex-specificitywouldfurtherconstraintheabilityof90

populationstorespondtolocalselectivepressures.91

Hereweusedbehavioralmeasurementsofover960Gryllusintegerindividualsto92

estimatetheinfluenceofcross-sexgeneticcorrelationsonevolutionaryresponses.We93

predictedthatcricketswouldexhibitdimorphisminaverageactivitygiventhemate-94

samplingbehavioroffemalesandthatgeneticvarianceforthistraitwouldbelowerfor95

femalecricketsduetoselectionfavoringincreasedtraveling.Wealsopredictedsex-96

specificityinthebehavioralsyndrome,withastrongerpositivegeneticcorrelation97

betweenantipredatorresponseandactivityinfemales.Sinceexitfromrefugiaandactivity98

shouldhaveastrongerinfluenceonfemalefitness,wealsoexpectedastrongercorrelation99

betweenshelteremergencewithactivityandantipredatorresponseinfemales.Although100

therearefewestimatesforcross-sexcorrelationsofbehaviors,thoseavailablesuggest101

behaviorsareundersimilarconstraintsasotherphenotypes(Poissantetal.2010).We102

thereforeexpectedthatcross-sexgeneticcorrelations(rmf)wouldnotdepartsignificantly103

from1.Wetestedthesepredictionsbyestimatingthecross-sexcovariancematrix,i.e.Gmf,104

decomposedintoitssex-specificandcross-sexsub-matrices(Gm,GfandBsubmatrices,105

Figure1).Wecomparedthestrengthofcovariancesamongsexesandtheeffectsofthese106

covariancesonresponsestoselectionusingrandomskeweranalysis.107

108

Page 8: Sex-specific syndromes and behavioral sexual dimorphism

8

METHODS109

Wecollectedadultfemalecricketsfromfourpopulationsthroughoutthesouthwesternand110

westernUS:Socorro,NM;LasCruces,NM;Aguila,AZ;andDunnigan,CA(Figure2)during111

thesummerof2017andhousedthemandinourlaboratoryfacilitiesatNorthDakotaState112

University.Femaleswerehousedindividuallyin0.71Lcontainersandprovidedwithad113

libitumfood(PurinaChickStarter)andwater(waterwasprovidedinglassvialscapped114

withcotton).Eachcricketwasalsoprovidedwithasmallpieceofcardboardeggcartonfor115

shelter.Thecrickethousingroomwasmaintained~27Cona12:12dark:lightcycle116

reversedsuchthattheroomwasdarkduringdaytimehours.Werunoffspringofthis117

parentalgenerationthroughmultiplebehavioraltrialsbeforematingindividualsatrandom118

withineachpopulation.Werepeatedthisprocessfortwoadditionalgenerations.119

Behavioraltesting120

Latencytoemergefromshelter121

Gryllidcricketsusesmallburrowsandnaturalcracksasrefugestowhichtheyretreatwhen122

underthreat.Thetimetakentoemergefromashelterafterdisturbancecanthereforebe123

consideredaproxyforrisk-takingbehavioror“boldness”(KortetandHedrick2007).We124

transferredindividualsfromtheirhomecontainersintosmallartificialburrows(40cm3)125

placedwithina34.6×21cmarena.Weleftthecricketstorestfortwominutesafterwhich126

weremovedthecapfromtheburrowandletindividualsemerge.Wethenrecordedhow127

longittookforanindividualtoemerge(inseconds)foruptosixminutesandthirty128

seconds.Individualsthatdidnotemergeweregivenamaximumlatencyof390seconds.129

Openfieldexploratorybehavior130

Weusedopenfieldteststomeasureactivityandexploratorypropensityina30×30cm131

plexiglassarena.Thesetestsareclassicbehavioralassayacrosstaxa(WalshandCummins132

1976)andcanrevealstrongamong-individualdifferencesinexplorationpatterns,133

includingincrickets(Royautéetal.2015,2019;RoyautéandDochtermann2017).134

Individualsthatmovethroughmoreofthearenaareconsideredmorethoroughexplorers135

(Réaleetal.2007).Weintroducedindividualsintothearenaandleftthemtorestundera136

Page 9: Sex-specific syndromes and behavioral sexual dimorphism

9

smallcontainerfor30seconds.Attheendofthis30seconds,weremovedthecontainer137

andthecricketwasallowedtoexplorethearenafor3minutesand40seconds.Thearena138

wascleanedwithisopropylalcoholbetweentrialstoremoveanychemosensorycuesfrom139

thearena.WeusedEthovisionXTtorecordthetotaldistancetheindividualmovedduring140

thetrial(cm).141

Responsetocuesofpredatorpresence142

Wemeasuredtheresponsetocuesofpredatorpresence,abehavioralassaycommonly143

usedinGryllidspeciestodetermineantipredatorresponse(RoyautéandDochtermann144

2017;Royautéetal.2019).Specifically,individualswereintroducedintoa15cmdiameter145

circulararena(7.5cmheight),thefloorofwhichwascoveredwithdryfilterpaperthathad146

beensoakedwithdilutedexcretafromleopardgeckos(Eublepharismacularius).Crickets147

respondtoexposuretoleopardgeckocuesbyincreasingactivityandindividualswith148

higherdistancemovedareconsideredmoreresponsivetothecue(Royautéand149

Dochtermann2017;Royautéetal.2019).Weintroducedcricketstoaportionofthearena150

withoutpredatorcueandleftthemtorestunderasmallshelterfor30seconds.Wethen151

removedtheshelterandallowedtheindividualallowedtofreelymovethroughoutthe152

arenafor3minutesand40seconds.WethenusedEthovisionXTtorecordthetotal153

distanceanindividualmovedduringthetrial(cm).154

155

Statisticalanalyses156

AllanalyseswereperformedusingRversion4.0.3(Rcitation)usingtheMCMCglmm157

package (Hadfield2010).158

Estimationofcross-sexgeneticcovariances(Gmf)159

Weusedamulti-responsemixedeffectanimalmodels(Kruuk2004;Wilsonetal.2010)to160

estimategeneticvariancesandcovariances(i.e.theGmfmatrix).Weincludedtheeffectsof161

temperature,dayandtimeoftestinginthebehavioralarenaroomalongwithsex,life-stage162

andmassoftheindividualasfixedeffects.Weusedtheindividualrelatednessmatrix163

Page 10: Sex-specific syndromes and behavioral sexual dimorphism

10

(basedontheknownpedigree)asarandomeffectandthefollowingbehavioraltraitswere164

includedasresponsevariables:(i)thelatencythatanindividualemergedfromtheshelter165

duringthetrial(modeledascensoredGaussian),(ii)thedistancemovedduringtheopen166

fieldtrial(Gaussian),(iii)thedistanceanindividualmovedduringthepredatorcue167

responsetrial(Gaussian).Toestimatebothsex-specificandcross-sexcovariances,we168

treatedthebehaviorofeachsexasaseparatetrait-resultingintheestimationofa6×6169

covariancematrix.Weranthemulti-responsemodelwithanMCMCchainof4.8×106170

iterations,withan800,000burn-inperiodandathinningintervalof4,000andweuseda171

parameterexpandedpriorthatwasminimallyinformativeforbothvariancesand172

covariances.Allvariancesandcovarianceswereestimatedattheadditivegeneticleveland173

onthelatentscale.174

175

Estimationofbehavioraldimorphism176

Wetestedfortheexistenceofsexualdimorphisminbehavioralexpressionbycomparing177

linearcoefficientforthesexfixedeffectincludedinourmultivariateanimalmodelandbase178

ourstatisticalinferenceontheirBayesianprobability(Pmcmc).Thismetricvariesbetween179

0.5and1andindicatestheprobabilityofasignificantdifferencebasedonthenumberof180

posteriorestimatesoverlappingwith0.Pmcmcvalues>0.95werejudgedassignificant.181

182

Comparisonofsex-specificcovariances(GmandGfmatrices)183

Weusedatwo-stepapproachtocomparetheintensityofthedifferenceingenetic184

covariancesamongsexes.First,wecalculatedthedifferenceincovariancebetweenmales185

andfemales(ΔCOVA)foreachpairofbehaviorsandtheirassociatedBayesianprobabilities186

(Pmcmc).Next,wetestedwhethersex-specificcovariancesweresimilarlyoriented.Todo187

so,wecalculatedthevectorcorrelation(r°)betweenaxescontainingthehighestamountof188

geneticvariationusingeigenvaluedecomposition.Wethenestimatedwhetherthe189

resultingvectorcorrelationsamongeigenvectorsofGdifferedsubstantiallyfrom190

expectationsof0(noalignmentofgeneticvariationamongsexes)and1(perfect191

Page 11: Sex-specific syndromes and behavioral sexual dimorphism

11

alignment).Becausevectorcorrelationsareboundedby0and1,weestimatedtheRegion192

ofPosteriorEquivalence(ROPE)whichwedefinedastheintervals[0.0;0.1]and[0.9;1.0].193

EstimatesfallingwithintheseROPEregionsarejudged“practicallyequivalent”tovector194

correlationsof0and1respectively.Weconvertedtheproportionofestimatesfalling195

outsidetheseROPEregionsintoPmcmcvaluestoinfersignificance,withPmcmc>0.95196

indicatingsignificantdeparturefromthesenullhypotheses.197

198

Estimatingthegeneticconstraintimposedbythecross-sexcovariancematrix(B)199

Wefirsttestedwhethercross-sexcovarianceswithintraitsdifferedsignificantlyfrom0and200

1.Cross-sexcovariancesarerepresentedonthediagonalelementsoftheBmatrix.A201

covarianceof0indicatecompletegeneticindependenceamongsexes,whichwe202

determinedusingBayesianprobabilities(Pmcmc).Totestforadeparturefromcomplete203

geneticcouplingamongsexes,weconvertedthecovariancestocorrelationcoefficients204

(rmf)andusedtheROPEtestdescribedabove.Wetheninvestigatedwhethercross-sex205

cross-traitscovariances–representedontheoff-diagonalelementsofB–differed206

significantlyfromoneanotherbycalculatingtheposteriordifferenceincovarianceas207

described(ΔCOVA).208

Next,wecomparedtheevolutionarytrajectoriesofsexeswithascenarioweresexes209

evolvedindependentlywithoneweresexeswerefullyconstrained(Coxetal.2017).Todo210

so,wesimulated500selectiongradientsbasedonamultivariatenormaldistributionthat211

wescaledtounitlength.Wegeneratedconcordantselectiongradientsbyassigningthe212

samevaluestomaleandfemalegradients(βf=βm)anddiscordantselectionbysettingβf=-213

βm.Weappliedeachselectiongradienttoall1,000posteriorcovariancematricesofGmf214

estimatedfromourmultivariateanimalmodel,thusensuringwetooktheuncertaintyin215

estimatesforward.Wethencalculatedtheresultingresponsetoselection(𝛥𝑧̅)byapplying216

themultivariatebreeder’sequationforcross-sexcovariance(Lande1980):217

$𝛥𝑧!̅𝛥𝑧"̅

% = #$$𝐆𝐟 𝐁′𝐁 𝐆𝐦

% $𝛽!𝛽"% (equation1)218

Page 12: Sex-specific syndromes and behavioral sexual dimorphism

12

Wecontrastedtheseresponsestoselectiontocaseswherewesetallcross-sexcovariances219

0andbyfullyconstrainingcross-sexcorrelationsto1.Toachievethislaststep,we220

convertedGmftoacorrelationmatrixandreplacedBelementsby1.Wethenback-221

convertedthismodifiedmatrixintocovariancesbyreplacingthediagonalelementsofBby222

thegeometricmeanofmaleandfemalegeneticvariances(i.e.thediagonalelementsofGf223

andGmrespectively).Wethenestimatedthevectorcorrelationbetweentheresponse224

calculatedfromourestimatedmatrixandthoseestimatedwithunconstrained(rB=0)and225

constrainedmatrices(rB=1).Next,wecomparedhowconsistentmaleandfemaleresponse226

waswhenevolvingtowardthesameoptimum(concordantselection)andwhenselection227

wasdiscordant.Thiswasachievedbycalculatingthevectorcorrelationbetweenthe228

directionofselectionforeachsexandthecorrespondingresponse(rβ×Δz).229

RESULTS230

Malesandfemalesshowedlittleevidenceforsexualdimorphisminaveragebehavior(all231

Pmcmc<0.57,TableS1,S2).WedidfindevidenceofaG×Sexinteraction,andfemaleshad232

lowerheritabilityandevolvabilitycomparedtomales(meanfemaleh2=0.10;meanmale233

h2=0.47;meanfemaleI=3.04%;meanmaleI=15.73%).Thisisconfirmedbythefact234

thattheadditivegeneticvariancewaslowerinfemalescomparedtomalesforallthree235

behaviors(posteriormedian[89%CI];shelteremergence:ΔVA(females–males)=-50.12[-236

110.18;8.18],Pmcmc=0.92;activity:ΔVA=-43.38[-89.01;-9.19],Pmcmc=0.99;237

antipredatorresponse:ΔVA=-17.63[-44.47;5.45],Pmcmc=0.92)(Figure2,3;TableS3).238

Wealsofoundstrongevidenceforthesex-specificexpressionofbehavioral239

syndromes,withweakergeneticcorrelationsbetweenbehaviorsinfemales.Malesand240

femalesdifferedprimarilyinhowshelteremergencerelatedtoopen-fieldactivityand241

antipredatorresponse(Figure2),whiletherelationshipbetweenopen-fieldactivityand242

antipredatorresponsewasstablebetweensexes(females:rmf=0.65[0.20;0.98],Pmcmc=243

0.94,Pmcmc=0.91;males:rmf=0.64[0.27;0.92],Pmcmc=0.98).Femalesthatstayed244

longerintheshelterhadlowerantipredatorresponseandtravelledfurtherintheopen-245

field(shelteremergence×open-field:rmf=-0.45[-0.92;0.11],Pmcmc=0.86;shelter246

emergence×antipred.:rmf=-0.48[-0.90;-0.01],Pmcmc=0.91).Incontrast,maleswith247

Page 13: Sex-specific syndromes and behavioral sexual dimorphism

13

slowshelteremergencehadhigheractivityandantipredatorresponse(shelteremergence248

×open-field:rmf=0.47[0.06;0.87],Pmcmc=0.93;shelteremergence×antipred.:rmf=249

0.50[-0.01;0.84],Pmcmc=0.92).Inaddition,thecorrelationbetweenmajoraxesof250

geneticvariation(gmax)wassignificantly<1,providinganotherlineofevidenceforthe251

presenceofasex-specificsyndrome(vectorcorrelationr°=0.36[0.00;0.76],Pmcmc≠1=252

0.97)(TableS2,S3).253

254

Page 14: Sex-specific syndromes and behavioral sexual dimorphism

14

255

Figure2.Geneticcorrelationmatrix(Gmf)indicatingsex-specificandcross-sexgenetic256 correlations.Heritabilities(h2)areindicatedonthemaindiagonalandgeneticcorrelations257 (r)ontheoff-diagonalelements.Off-diagonalelementsrepresenteitherthesex-specific258 geneticcorrelations(rfandrminlightgrey)orthecross-sexgeneticcorrelations(rmfin259 darkgrey).BoldindicatesignificantcorrelationsbasedonPmcmc>0.95.Correlationswith260 Pmcmc>0.90areindicatedinitalics.Cross-sexcorrelationssignificantlydifferentfrom1261 areindicatedwithanasterisk.262

263

Page 15: Sex-specific syndromes and behavioral sexual dimorphism

15

Allbehaviorsshowedweaktomoderatecross-sexcorrelationsandwere264

significantlybelow1(shelteremergence:rmf=-0.09[-0.59;0.39],Pmcmc≠1=1.00;activity:265

rmf=0.65[0.22,0.97],Pmcmc≠1=0.94;antipredatorresponse:rmf=0.64[0.26;0.94],266

Pmcmc≠1=0.96)(TableS3).Inaddition,sexeshadbiasedexpressionofdifferenttrait267

combinations,asindicatedbythehighproportionofasymmetryinB—thecross-sex268

covariancematrix(proportionofskew-symmetry=0.25[0.04,0.42]).Thisdegreeof269

asymmetrywasmostpronouncedforthecross-sexcorrelationsbetweenshelter270

emergenceandactivity(ΔCOVA=-21.39[-43.72;-0.56],Pmcmc=0.97)andbetween271

shelteremergenceandantipredatorresponse(ΔCOVA=-14.8[-32.33;1.46],Pmcmc=272

0.95).Incontrast,thecorrelationbetweenactivityandantipredatorresponsedidnotdiffer273

amongsexes(ΔCOVA=-3.02[-11.73;6.73],Pmcmc=0.71)(Figure3).274

Thismeansthathighlyactivefathersproduceddaughterswithfastershelter275

emergence(rmf=-0.50[-0.85;-0.06],Pmcmc=0.94)andhigherantipredatorresponse(rmf276

=0.57[0.12;0.95],Pmcmc=0.93).Incontrast,activemothersonlyweaklycontributedto277

theirsons’shelteremergence(rmf=0.39[-0.14;0.85],Pmcmc=0.85)andantipredator278

response(rmf=0.42[-0.01;0.85],Pmcmc=0.90).279

280

Page 16: Sex-specific syndromes and behavioral sexual dimorphism

16

281

Figure3.Thegeneticstructureoftheboldness-activitysyndromedifferedbothintermsof282 itssex-specificgeneticvariances(A)andcorrelations(B)aswellasitscross-sex283 correlationswithintraits(C)andcross-sexcross-traitscorrelations(D).284

285

Page 17: Sex-specific syndromes and behavioral sexual dimorphism

17

Finally,bysimulatingresponsestoselection,wefoundthatevolutionarytrajectories286

weremoreconsistentwithbehaviorsbeingsexuallyindependentthanwithaconstrained287

expressionofbehaviors.Thiswasthecaseregardlessofwhetherselectionfavoredsex-288

specificoptima(i.e.discordantselection:rB=0= 0.95 [0.73;1.00];rB=1=0.28[0.00;0.56];Δr289

=0.64[0.24;0.98],Pmcmc=0.96)orwhenbothsexeshadthesameoptimum(i.e.290

concordantselection:rB=0=0.95[0.74;1.00],Δr=0.23[-0.04;0.66],Pmcmc=0.95)(Figure291

4).Wenextcomparedtheagreementbetweensimulatedselectiongradientsandpredicted292

responsetoselection(rβ×Δz)betweensexes.Malesandfemaleshadequallyconsistent293

responsestoconcordantselection(femalerβ×Δz=0.72[0.29;1.00];malerβ×Δz=0.75[0.47;294

1.00];Δrβ×Δz=-0.19[-0.67;0.07],Pmcmc=0.88).However,femaleresponsetendedtobe295

biasedawayfromselectioncomparedtomaleswhenselectionwasdiscordant(femalerβ×Δz296

=0.50[0.06;0.95];malerβ×Δz=0.77[0.46;1.00],Δrβ×Δz=-0.27[-0.75;0.11],Pmcmc=0.86).297

Thiscouldmeanthatthemagnitudeofthegeneticconstraintisexpressedmorestronglyin298

males,whichisconsistentwiththeasymmetricnatureofthecross-sexcovariancematrix.299

However,thislastresultshouldbeinterpretedwithcautiongiventhewidecredible300

intervalsaroundtheseestimates. 301

Page 18: Sex-specific syndromes and behavioral sexual dimorphism

18

302

Figure4.Theresponsetoselectionismoreconsistentwithmodelsweresexesevolve303

independently(B=0)thanmodelswheresexesarefullyconstrained(B=1).Thistrendis304

mostpronouncedwhenselectionfavoursoppositeoptimaamongsexes(discordant305

selection).Positivevaluesindicatethattheobservedresponsetoselection(Δz)ismore306

stronglycorrelatedwithresponsestoselectionwhereelementsofthecross-sexcovariance307

matrixaresetto0(B=0)comparedtoresponsestoselectionwherethecross-sex308

covarianceisfullyconstrained(B=1),basedon1,000randomselectiongradientsapplied309

toeach1,000posteriorcovariancematrices. 310

Page 19: Sex-specific syndromes and behavioral sexual dimorphism

19

DISCUSSION311

Ourresultsshowthatmalesandfemalesdiffersubstantiallyintheirbehavioralsyndromes312

atthegeneticlevel.Shelteremergencewasgeneticallyindependentbetweenmalesand313

females,whereasthegeneticconstraintforactivityandantipredatorresponsewas314

strongerbutstilldepartedfrom1.Theabsenceofastronggeneticconstraintlinkingthe315

sexesissurprisinggiventhatthebehaviorswemeasuredarenottypicallyconsidered316

distinctsex-specifictraits.Inthecaseofshelteremergence,across-sexcorrelation317

approachingzeroimpliesthatthesamebehaviorisunderpinnedbycompletely318

independentsetsofgenesinmalesandfemales.Suchgeneticuncouplingmeansthatthis319

behaviorcanfulfilldifferentfunctionsineachsexandcanevolveindependently.Our320

resultssuggestthatsexualconflictmayhavebeenresolvedinthisspecieseveninabsence321

ofobservablebehavioraldimorphism.322

Byapplyingaquantitativegeneticapproach,wewereabletouncovermultipleways323

inwhichsexesdifferedintheirbehaviors.Whilemalesandfemalesdidnotdifferinmean324

behaviors,weuncoveredasignatureofbehavioraldimorphismintheamountofgenetic325

variationexpressedbyeachsex.ThisG×Sexeffectwascharacterizedbyfemalebehavior326

beinglessheritablethanobservedformales.Inourcase,traitswithlowerheritabilities327

alsohadlowerevolvabilities,indicatingthatfemalesarelessresponsivetoselective328

pressuresthanmalesinthisspecies.Thisstrongdifferenceingeneticvariancebetween329

sexescouldresultfromstrongerstabilizingselectioninfemaleserodinggeneticvariation330

intraitsrelatedtoexplorationandrisktakingwhilemaintainingasimilaroptimumineach331

sex.Multivariatestabilizingselectionhasindeedbeenshowntobeanimportantdriverof332

traitevolution,forexampleingenitalmorphologyinarthropods(Arnqvist1997;Houseet333

al.2020).Anotherpossibilityisthatrearingindividualsinlaboratoryconditionswithad-lib334

accesstofoodandsheltercouldalleviatetheresourceacquisitionandallocationtrade-offs335

thatmaybenegotiateddifferentlybyeachsex.Thisexplanationisespeciallyplausibleif336

malesandfemalesmodifytheirphenotypestodifferentdegreeinresponsetocaptivity.337

Notetoothattheenvironmentalcontributiontofemales’behavioralphenotypewasmuch338

greaterthanthatofmales,leavingspacefordifferentialadjustmentofbehaviorbysexesto339

occur.340

Page 20: Sex-specific syndromes and behavioral sexual dimorphism

20

Malesandfemalesdifferedsubstantiallyinhowtheyexpressedaboldness-activity341

syndrome.Contrarytoourpredictions,inbothsexesactivegenotypeswerealsomore342

sensitivetopredatorycues,withnochangetothemagnitudeofthegeneticcorrelation.The343

primarydifferencewasthereforeinhowshelteremergencerelatedtoactivityand344

antipredatorresponse.“Bold”females–i.e.femaleswithfastemergencefromtheshelter–345

hadhigheractivityandantipredatorresponse.Incontrast,activemalesweremore346

sensitivetopredatorcuesandbehavedcautiouslywhenemergingfromtheshelter.This347

resultprovidesimportantinsightintohowmaleandfemalecricketshandlerisky348

situations.Femalemusttravelthroughriskyenvironmentsinordertolocatemates.349

Therefore,boldandactivegenotypesmayneedtocompensatefortheseriskybehaviorsby350

beingmorereactivetothepresenceofpredatorcues.Males,incontrast,stayclosetotheir351

shelterbutproducecourtshipsignalsthatmakethemthetargetofpredatorsandparasites.352

Asaresult,boldermalesmayignorethepresenceofpredatorycuesifthisstrategyyields353

higherfrequencyofencounterswithfemales.Thistypeofriskcompensationstrategyhas354

alreadybeenshowninpreviousstudieswheremaleswithmoreattractivesongsstay355

longerinshelters(Hedrick2000).356

Ourfindingsthatmalesandfemalesdifferedinthegeneticexpressionbehavioral357

syndromesandthatcross-sexcorrelationsareuncoupledsuggestthatrisk-takingis358

regulatedbydifferentphysiologicalpathwaysineachsex.Incrickets,severalmonoamine359

neurohormonesareinvolvedintheregulationofmultiplebehaviorstiedtoa“fightor360

flight”response,includingaggression,courtship,dispersalandresponsetosimulated361

predationexposure(Adamoetal.1995,2013;StevensonandRillich2016;Adamo2017;362

Lundgrenetal.2021).However,experimentstendtoeitherfocusonmalesexclusivelyor363

arenotdesignedtoaddresssex-differencesinphysiologicalmechanisms.However,sex-364

differencesinasimilaraxisofvariation,theproactive/reactiveaxis,havealsobeen365

describedinseveralvertebratetaxa(Kokrasetal.2012;Immonenetal.2018).366

Thegeneticstructureofbehavioralsyndromesishighlyconservedinthisspecies,367

evenacrossisolatedpopulations(Royautéetal.2020).Thisindicatesthatbehavioral368

syndromesmaynotvarymuchwhenexposedtodifferentselectivepressures.Instead,369

geneticconstraintsresultingfrompleiotropywasthemorelikelyexplanationsforthe370

Page 21: Sex-specific syndromes and behavioral sexual dimorphism

21

presenceofbehavioralsyndromeinthisspecies.Here,weshowthatbehavioralsyndromes371

differedmorestronglybetweensexesthanamongpopulations.Alikelyexplanationisthat372

malesandfemalesexpresssex-specificbehaviorsregardlessofthepopulationoforigin.As373

aresult,selectionmaybemorelikelytodifferbetweensexesthanbetweenpopulations.374

Whilecomparisonsofdifferencesinselectionamongsexesandpopulationsarescarce,375

previousstudiessuggestthatsexuallydiscordantselectioniscommoninthewildand376

tendstobestrongerintraitsinwhichsexualdimorphismispronounced(Coxetal.2009).377

Whilerarelyinvestigated,sexspecificdifferencesinbehavioralsyndromeshave378

beendemonstratedinsomespecies.However,mostofthesestudieshavefocusedon379

comparisonsofbehavioralrepeatabilitiesbetweenmalesandfemalesinsingletraits380

(Jenkins2011;Debeffeetal.2015)ratherprovidingabroaderexplorationofmultivariate381

patternsofcross-sexcorrelationinbehavioraltraits,aswedidhere.Interestingly,(Hedrick382

andKortet2012)previouslyidentifiedsexdifferencesintherepeatabilityofshelter383

emergenceinaseparatepopulationofG.integer.Contrarytowhatwedetected,maleshad384

lowerrepeatabilitycomparedtofemales.Notethatrepeatabilityandheritabilityarenot385

directlycomparablebecauserepeatabilityalsoincludessourcesofvariationduetothe386

“permanentenvironment”whileheritabilityonlyincludesadditivegeneticvariation.More387

recentlyseveralstudieshavealsocomparedsyndromestructureamongsexeswithmixed388

results.Somestudiesreportedlargedifferencesinbehavioralsyndromesbetweenmales389

andfemales(Fresneauetal.2014;Hanetal.2015;Royauté2015;Wayetal.2015)while390

otherssupportaconservedsyndromestructurebetweensexes(Michelangelietal.2016;391

Gouletetal.2021).Ourresultssupplyanadditionallineofevidenceinfavorofsex-specific392

syndromes.393

Thereisonlylimitedexplorationofmultivariatepatternsofcross-sexcorrelationin394

behavioraltraits.Moststudiesreportedfrom(Poissantetal.2010)concernsingletraits395

andpointtostrongcross-sexcorrelationswithrelativelyweakdimorphismforbehavior.396

Themajorityoftheseestimateswere,however,fromstudiesinterestedinsexualselection,397

with<4%ofestimatescomingfromexplicitlybehavioralstudies.Becausewealso398

estimatedthecross-sexcorrelationattheadditivegeneticlevel,wewereabletodetermine399

thatbehavioraltraitsmaybelessconstrainedbysexthanpreviouslythought.Indeed,our400

Page 22: Sex-specific syndromes and behavioral sexual dimorphism

22

meanestimateforrmfwasmuchweakerthanobservedinpreviousstudiesevaluatingintra-401

locussexualconflictsinbehavior(meanrmf=0.46vs.0.77,Poissantetal.2010).Our402

resultssuggestthatbehavioraltraitsmaycommonlyfulfilldifferentfunctionsbetween403

sexesandshouldthereforebeanalyzedasseparatetraitsbetweenthesexesinbehavioral404

syndromeandanimalpersonalitystudies.405

Veryfewstudieshavebeenabletoestimatethegeneticcontributionofsexesto406

behavioralsyndromesaswehavedonehere.Intheorb-weavingspiderNuctenea407

umbratical,cross-sexcorrelationsforactivityandaggressionwereinthesamerangeasour408

estimatesforactivityandantipredatorresponse(rmf=0.50)(Kralj-Fišeretal.2019).In409

Gryllusbimaculatus,whichiscloselyrelatedtoG.integer,explorationandaggressionare410

morestronglycorrelatedinfemalesandthesetraitshaveasymmetriccontributionsacross411

sexes(Hanetal.2019).However,cross-sexcorrelationswithintraitswerequalitatively412

strongerthanobservedinourstudy(meanrmf=0.70vsmeanrmf=0.46),pointingtoa413

strongergeneticconstraintbetweensexesthanweobservedinGryllusinteger.Finally,414

Whiteetal.(2019)showeddifferencesbetweensex-specificcovariancesinguppiesto415

similarG.integer.However,theyreportedamuchweakersignalofasymmetryinB.The416

factthatthesefewstudiesdifferwidelyinconclusionsshowsthatthereisnoconsensusyet417

onhowbehavioralsyndromesdifferbetweensexesandevencloselyrelatedspeciesmay418

showstrongdifferencesintheexpressionofbehavioraldimorphism.419

Otherstudies,conductedprimarilyonmorphologicaltraits,pointtostrong420

constraintsimposedbygeneticcross-sexcovariances(Gosdenetal.2012;Gosdenand421

Chenoweth2014;SztepanaczandHoule2019).Inourcase,theconstrainingeffectofcross-422

sexcovarianceswasweakatbestandresponsestoselectionweremoreconsistentwith423

independentevolutionarytrajectoriesforeachsex.Thisissimilartoapreviousstudyon424

sexuallydimorphicornamentsinbrownanoleswhichshowedthatthecross-sex425

covarianceamongornamentsdidnotsubstantiallyconstraintheevolutionofdimorphism426

(Coxetal.2017).427

Wefoundahighdegreeofasymmetryinthecross-sexcross-traitscomponentsof428

thegeneticcovariancematrix.Inparticular,maleactivityhadastrongercontributionto429

Page 23: Sex-specific syndromes and behavioral sexual dimorphism

23

femaleshelteremergencethanfemaleactivityonmaleshelteremergence.Thistypeof430

asymmetriccontributiontothephenotypeisexpectedtobiasresponsesawayfrom431

selection.InDrosophilaforexample,wingshapeevolutionisprimarilyshapedbycross-sex432

covariancesforthesametrait(i.e.thediagonalelementsofB)ratherthancross-sexcross-433

traitcovariances(SztepanaczandHoule2019).Thiswasthecaseeventhoughupperand434

lowerelementsoftheBmatrixfrequentlyhadoppositesignsanddespiteageneral,though435

weaker,signalofasymmetrysuchaswereporthere(5%vs.25%).Despitestrong436

asymmetryinourestimateofcross-sexcovariances,wefoundonlyweakevidencefor437

biasedresponsestoselection.Instead,oursimulationsoftheresponsestoselections438

showedthattheevolutionofbehavioraldimorphismswasmoreconsistentwithscenarios439

inwhichsexesaregeneticallyuncoupledandallowedtoevolveindependentlycomparedto440

afullyconstrainedcross-sexgeneticarchitecture.Thismeansthattheindependent441

evolutionarytrajectoriesbysexeswereportarelikelyaresultoftheweakcross-sex442

correlationswithintraitswedetected(meanrmf<0.50).443

Weshowthattraitsinvolvedinstudiesofanimalpersonalityhaveasex-specific444

geneticarchitecture.Thesebehaviorsaregeneticallyuncoupledbetweensexesandallow445

sexestofollowindependentevolutionarytrajectories.Ourresultsareintriguingbecause446

theorypredictsthatcross-sexcovarianceswillactasconstraintsandlimittheabilitiesof447

sexestoreachtheiroptimum.Thetypeofgeneticindependencewefoundsuggestsapast448

historyofdiscordantselectionthathasstronglyshapedbehavioraldimorphismandhas449

resolvedsexualconflictinthisspecies.450

451

Page 24: Sex-specific syndromes and behavioral sexual dimorphism

24

LITTERATURECITED452

Adamo,S.A.2017.Thestressresponseandimmunesystemshare,borrow,andreconfigure453

theirphysiologicalnetworkelements:Evidencefromtheinsects.Horm.Behav.454

88:25–30.455

Adamo,S.A.,I.Kovalko,andB.Mosher.2013.Thebehaviouraleffectsofpredator-induced456

stressresponsesinthecricket(Gryllustexensis):theupsideofthestressresponse.457

J.Exp.Biol.216:4608–4614.TheCompanyofBiologistsLtd.458

Adamo,S.A.,C.E.Linn,andR.R.Hoy.1995.Theroleofneurohormonaloctopamineduring459

“fightorflight”behaviourinthefieldcricketGryllusbimaculatus.J.Exp.Biol.460

198:1691–1700.TheCompanyofBiologistsLtd.461

Aragón,P.2011.Theresponsetothesocialenvironmentrevealssex-dependent462

behaviouralsyndromesintheBosca’snewt(Lissotritonboscai).J.Ethol.29:79–83.463

Arnqvist,G.1997.Theevolutionofanimalgenitalia:distinguishingbetweenhypothesesby464

singlespeciesstudies.Biol.J.Linn.Soc.60:365–379.465

Berger,D.,E.C.Berg,W.Widegren,G.Arnqvist,andA.A.Maklakov.2014.Multivariate466

intralocussexualconflictinseedbeetles.Evolution68:3457–3469.467

Blanckenhorn,W.U.2005.BehavioralCausesandConsequencesofSexualSize468

Dimorphism.Ethology111:977–1016.469

Bonduriansky,R.,andS.F.Chenoweth.2009.Intralocussexualconflict.TrendsEcol.Evol.470

24:280–288.471

Cox,R.M.,R.A.Costello,B.E.Camber,andJ.W.McGlothlin.2017.Multivariategenetic472

architectureoftheAnolisdewlaprevealsbothsharedandsex-specificfeaturesofa473

sexuallydimorphicornament.J.Evol.Biol.30:1262–1275.474

Page 25: Sex-specific syndromes and behavioral sexual dimorphism

25

Debeffe,L.,J.F.Lemaître,U.A.Bergvall,A.J.M.Hewison,J.M.Gaillard,N.Morellet,M.475

Goulard,C.Monestier,M.David,H.Verheyden-Tixier,L.Jäderberg,C.Vanpé,andP.476

Kjellander.2015.Short-andlong-termrepeatabilityofdocilityintheroedeer:sex477

andagematter.Anim.Behav.109:53–63.478

Delph,L.F.,J.C.Steven,I.A.Anderson,C.R.Herlihy,andE.D.B.Iii.2011.Eliminationofa479

GeneticCorrelationBetweentheSexesViaArtificialCorrelationalSelection.480

Evolution65:2872–2880.481

Dochtermann,N.A.,andN.J.Dingemanse.2013.Behavioralsyndromesasevolutionary482

constraints.Behav.Ecol.24:806–811.OxfordAcademic.483

French,B.W.,andW.H.Cade.1987.Thetimingofcalling,movement,andmatinginthe484

fieldcricketsGryllusveletis,G.pennsylvanicus,andG.integer.Behav.Ecol.485

Sociobiol.21:157–162.486

Fresneau,N.,E.Kluen,andJ.E.Brommer.2014.Asex-specificbehavioralsyndromeina487

wildpasserine.Behav.Ecol.25:359–367.488

Gosden,T.P.,andS.F.Chenoweth.2014.TheEvolutionaryStabilityofCross-Sex,Cross-489

TraitGeneticCovariances.Evolution68:1687–1697.490

Gosden,T.P.,K.-L.Shastri,P.Innocenti,andS.F.Chenoweth.2012.TheB-MatrixHarbors491

SignificantandSex-SpecificConstraintsontheEvolutionofMulticharacterSexual492

Dimorphism.Evolution66:2106–2116.493

Goulet,C.T.,W.Hart,B.L.Phillips,J.Llewelyn,B.B.M.Wong,andD.G.Chapple.2021.No494

behavioralsyndromesorsex-specificpersonalitydifferencesinthesouthern495

rainforestsunskink(Lampropholissimilis).Ethology127:102–108.496

Page 26: Sex-specific syndromes and behavioral sexual dimorphism

26

Hadfield,J.D.2010.MCMCmethodsformulti-responsegeneralizedlinearmixedmodels:497

theMCMCglmmRpackage.J.Stat.Softw.33:1–22.498

Hämäläinen,A.,E.Immonen,M.Tarka,andW.Schuett.2018.Evolutionofsex-specificpace-499

of-lifesyndromes:causesandconsequences.Behav.Ecol.Sociobiol.72:50.500

Han,C.S.,T.P.Gosden,andN.J.Dingemanse.2019.Proteindeprivationfacilitatesthe501

independentevolutionofbehaviorandmorphology.Evolution73:1809–1820.502

Han,C.S.,P.G.Jablonski,andR.C.Brooks.2015.Intimidatingcourtshipandsexdifferences503

inpredationriskleadtosex-specificbehaviouralsyndromes.Anim.Behav.109:177–504

185.505

Hedrick,A.V.,andR.Kortet.2012.Sexdifferencesintherepeatabilityofboldnessover506

metamorphosis.Behav.Ecol.Sociobiol.66:407–412.507

Hedrick,A.V.,andE.J.Temeles.1989.Theevolutionofsexualdimorphisminanimals:508

Hypothesesandtests.TrendsEcol.Evol.4:136–138.509

House,C.,P.Tunstall,J.Rapkin,M.J.Bale,M.Gage,E.delCastillo,andJ.Hunt.2020.510

Multivariatestabilizingsexualselectionandtheevolutionofmaleandfemalegenital511

morphologyintheredflourbeetle*.Evolution74:883–896.512

Immonen,E.,A.Hämäläinen,W.Schuett,andM.Tarka.2018.Evolutionofsex-specificpace-513

of-lifesyndromes:geneticarchitectureandphysiologicalmechanisms.Behav.Ecol.514

Sociobiol.72:60.515

Jenkins,S.H.2011.Sexdifferencesinrepeatabilityoffood-hoardingbehaviourofkangaroo516

rats.Anim.Behav.81:1155–1162.517

Page 27: Sex-specific syndromes and behavioral sexual dimorphism

27

Kokras,N.,C.Dalla,A.C.Sideris,A.Dendi,H.G.Mikail,K.Antoniou,andZ.Papadopoulou-518

Daifoti.2012.Behavioralsexualdimorphisminmodelsofanxietyanddepression519

duetochangesinHPAaxisactivity.Neuropharmacology62:436–445.520

Kortet,R.,andA.Hedrick.2007.AbehaviouralsyndromeinthefieldcricketGryllusinteger:521

intrasexualaggressioniscorrelatedwithactivityinanovelenvironment.Biol.J.522

Linn.Soc.91:475–482.523

Kralj-Fišer,S.,K.L.Laskowski,andF.Garcia-Gonzalez.2019.Sexdifferencesinthegenetic524

architectureofaggressivenessinasexuallydimorphicspider.Ecol.Evol.9:10758–525

10766.526

Kruuk,L.E.B.2004.Estimatinggeneticparametersinnaturalpopulationsusingthe‘animal527

model.’Philos.Trans.R.Soc.Lond.B.Biol.Sci.359:873–890.528

Lande,R.1980.SexualDimorphism,SexualSelection,andAdaptationinPolygenic529

Characters.Evolution34:292–305.[SocietyfortheStudyofEvolution,Wiley].530

Long,T.A.F.,andW.R.Rice.2007.Adultlocomotoryactivitymediatesintralocussexual531

conflictinalaboratory-adaptedpopulationofDrosophilamelanogaster.Proc.R.Soc.532

BBiol.Sci.274:3105–3112.RoyalSociety.533

Lundgren,K.A.,R.N.Abbey-Lee,L.C.Garnham,A.Kreshchenko,S.Ryding,andH.Løvlie.534

2021.Manipulatingmonoaminesreducesexplorationandboldnessof535

Mediterraneanfieldcrickets.Behav.Processes183:104298.536

Mainwaring,M.C.,J.L.Beal,andI.R.Hartley.2011.Zebrafinchesarebolderinanasocial,537

ratherthansocial,context.Behav.Processes87:171–175.538

Page 28: Sex-specific syndromes and behavioral sexual dimorphism

28

Michelangeli,M.,D.G.Chapple,andB.B.M.Wong.2016.Arebehaviouralsyndromessex539

specific?Personalityinawidespreadlizardspecies.Behav.Ecol.Sociobiol.70:1911–540

1919.541

Moiron,M.,K.L.Laskowski,andP.T.Niemelä.2020.Individualdifferencesinbehaviour542

explainvariationinsurvival:ameta-analysis.Ecol.Lett.23:399–408.543

Poissant,J.,A.J.Wilson,andD.W.Coltman.2010.Sex-SpecificGeneticVarianceandthe544

EvolutionofSexualDimorphism:ASystematicReviewofCross-SexGenetic545

Correlations.Evolution64:97–107.546

Réale,D.,S.M.Reader,D.Sol,P.T.McDougall,andN.J.Dingemanse.2007.Integrating547

animaltemperamentwithinecologyandevolution.Biol.Rev.82:291–318.548

Royauté,C.,R.,.Buddle,C.M.,.Vincent.2015.Undertheinfluence:Sublethalexposuretoan549

insecticideaffectspersonalityexpressioninajumpingspider.29.550

Royauté,R.,andN.A.Dochtermann.2017.Whenthemeannolongermatters:551

Developmentaldietaffectsbehavioralvariationbutnotpopulationaveragesinthe552

housecricket(Achetadomesticus).Behav.Ecol.28:337–345.553

Royauté,R.,C.Garrison,J.Dalos,M.A.Berdal,andN.A.Dochtermann.2019.Currentenergy554

stateinteractswiththedevelopmentalenvironmenttoinfluencebehavioural555

plasticity.Anim.Behav.148:39–51.556

Royauté,R.,K.Greenlee,M.Baldwin,andN.A.Dochtermann.2015.Behaviour,metabolism557

andsize:phenotypicmodularityorintegrationinAchetadomesticus?Anim.Behav.558

110:163–169.559

Page 29: Sex-specific syndromes and behavioral sexual dimorphism

29

Royauté,R.,A.Hedrick,andN.A.Dochtermann.2020.Behaviouralsyndromesshape560

evolutionarytrajectoriesviaconservedgeneticarchitecture.Proc.R.Soc.BBiol.Sci.561

287:20200183.RoyalSociety.562

Schuett,W.,T.Tregenza,andS.R.X.Dall.2010.Sexualselectionandanimalpersonality.563

Biol.Rev.85:217–246.564

Sih,A.,A.Bell,andJ.C.Johnson.2004.Behavioralsyndromes:anecologicaland565

evolutionaryoverview.TrendsEcol.Evol.19:372–378.566

Stevenson,P.A.,andJ.Rillich.2016.Controllingthedecisiontofightorflee:therolesof567

biogenicaminesandnitricoxideinthecricket†.Curr.Zool.62:265–275.568

Sztepanacz,J.L.,andD.Houle.2019.Cross-sexgeneticcovarianceslimittheevolvabilityof569

wing-shapewithinandamongspeciesofDrosophila.Evolution73:1617–1633.John570

Wiley&Sons,Ltd.571

Walsh,B.,andM.W.Blows.2009.AbundantGeneticVariation+StrongSelection=572

MultivariateGeneticConstraints:AGeometricViewofAdaptation.Annu.Rev.Ecol.573

Evol.Syst.40:41–59.574

Way,G.P.,A.L.Kiesel,N.Ruhl,J.L.Snekser,andS.P.McRobert.2015.Sexdifferencesina575

shoaling-boldnessbehavioralsyndrome,butnolinkwithaggression.Behav.576

Processes113:7–12.577

Wilson,A.J.,D.Réale,M.N.Clements,M.M.Morrissey,E.Postma,C.A.Walling,L.E.B.578

Kruuk,andD.H.Nussey.2010.Anecologist’sguidetotheanimalmodel.J.Anim.579

Ecol.79:13–26.580

581