40 Over the past seven decades since the founding of the People’s Republic of China in 1949, foreign trade has played a positive role in China’s economic growth and opening-up. With its growing import and export volumes and its improving trade structure owing to constant trade policy adjustments, China has developed into a large and increasingly more competitive trading nation. 1. Evolving Philosophy on Foreign Trade and Trade Growth in China Since the founding of the People’s Republic of China in 1949, foreign trade has played an increasingly more important role in China’s economy. China’s trade growth has been accompanied by a changing trade philosophy. 1 After reform and opening-up in 1978, in particular, China integrated itself to the global value chain of specialization, which enabled its foreign trade development (Pei, 2009; IMF, 2004). 2 . By integrating into the East Asian manufacturing network, China increased its trade volume along with improving its trade structure (UNCTAD, 2007). 3 In this process, China’s institutional development and policymaking went hand in hand. By increasing its trade openness and developing free-trade systems in line with international standards, China has brought about synergy between reform Seven Decades of China’s Foreign Trade: Growth and Structural Improvement Yue Yunxia Institute of Latin American Studies (ILAS), Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing, China Abstract: Over the past seven decades since the founding of the People’s Republic of China in 1949, China has continuously increased its import and export volumes along with improving its trade structure, becoming a major trading nation and making progress toward a trading power. In the 13th Five-Year Plan period (2016-2020), China has experienced acceleration in its foreign trade structural adjustment under its opening-up strategy, and the function of foreign trade has shifted from being a driver for growth to being a way to balance development. China is expected to continue its trade growth momentum and structural improvement and strengthen its trade competitiveness. In achieving this vision, China should make efforts to increase structural equilibrium, create a favorable external trade environment, and pave the way for trade growth and sustainable development. Keywords: foreign trade, trade growth, qualitative improvement, trade structure, trading power JEL classification code: F13, F14 DOI: 1 0.19602/j .chinaeconomist.2019.7.03 Correspondence: [email protected]1 Pei Changhong: “Basic Theme of China’s Foreign Trade in 65 Years: Transformation and Growth,”, Researches In Chinese Economic History, p.23-33. 2 Pei Changhong: “China’s Foreign Trade: Six Decades of Evolution and Forecast,” Reform, Vol.7, 2009, p.5-12; Eswar Prasad (ed.), China’s Growth and Integration into the World Economy: Prospects and Challenges, IMF, 2004, p.1. 3 UNCTAD, Trade and Development 2017: Regional Cooperation for Development, https://unctad.org/en/pages/PublicationArchive. aspx?publicationid=2146, 2018.
26
Embed
Seven Decades of China s Foreign Trade: Growth and Structural ...ilas.cass.cn/xschengguo/xslunwen/201909/W020190902350462605… · 40 Over the past seven decades since the founding
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
40
Over the past seven decades since the founding of the People’s Republic of China in 1949, foreign trade has played a positive role in China’s economic growth and opening-up. With its growing import and export volumes and its improving trade structure owing to constant trade policy adjustments, China has developed into a large and increasingly more competitive trading nation.
1. Evolving Philosophy on Foreign Trade and Trade Growth in ChinaSince the founding of the People’s Republic of China in 1949, foreign trade has played an
increasingly more important role in China’s economy. China’s trade growth has been accompanied by a changing trade philosophy.1 After reform and opening-up in 1978, in particular, China integrated itself to the global value chain of specialization, which enabled its foreign trade development (Pei, 2009; IMF, 2004).2. By integrating into the East Asian manufacturing network, China increased its trade volume along with improving its trade structure (UNCTAD, 2007).3 In this process, China’s institutional development and policymaking went hand in hand. By increasing its trade openness and developing free-trade systems in line with international standards, China has brought about synergy between reform
Seven Decades of China’s Foreign Trade: Growth and Structural Improvement
Yue YunxiaInstitute of Latin American Studies (ILAS), Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing, China
Abstract: Over the past seven decades since the founding of the People’s Republic of China in 1949, China has continuously increased its import and export volumes along with improving its trade structure, becoming a major trading nation and making progress toward a trading power. In the 13th Five-Year Plan period (2016-2020), China has experienced acceleration in its foreign trade structural adjustment under its opening-up strategy, and the function of foreign trade has shifted from being a driver for growth to being a way to balance development. China is expected to continue its trade growth momentum and structural improvement and strengthen its trade competitiveness. In achieving this vision, China should make efforts to increase structural equilibrium, create a favorable external trade environment, and pave the way for trade growth and sustainable development.
Correspondence: [email protected] Pei Changhong: “Basic Theme of China’s Foreign Trade in 65 Years: Transformation and Growth,”, Researches In Chinese Economic History,
p.23-33.2 Pei Changhong: “China’s Foreign Trade: Six Decades of Evolution and Forecast,” Reform, Vol.7, 2009, p.5-12; Eswar Prasad (ed.), China’s
Growth and Integration into the World Economy: Prospects and Challenges, IMF, 2004, p.1.3 UNCTAD, Trade and Development 2017: Regional Cooperation for Development, https://unctad.org/en/pages/PublicationArchive.
aspx?publicationid=2146, 2018.
41China Economist Vol.14, No.4, July-August 2019
中国对外贸易70年:量质并进 岳云霞
中国社会科学院拉丁美洲研究所
摘 要:新中国成立70年以来,中国对外贸易经历了四个阶段的发展历程,持续保
持了进出口的数量扩张,并推动了进出口结构的质性改善,形成了贸易量变和质变
的有机结合和良性互动,使得自身成长为全球贸易大国,在向贸易强国发展的道路
上取得了实质性进展。“十三五”规划以来,在中国对外开放的总体战略性布局
下,中国对外贸易近年来的结构性调整加速,其功能逐渐由增长驱动器转向发展平
衡器。未来中国对外贸易有望继续实现贸易数量与质量并进,推动自身实现由贸易
大国向贸易强国的晋级。而在此进程中,应当通过相关保障性措施的出台,促进结
构性平衡,为中国进出口创造良好的外部环境,并为对外贸易的平稳增长和可持续
发展打下扎实基础。
关键词:对外贸易;量变;质变;结构;贸易强国
JEL 分类号: F13, F14
1 裴长洪:《中国对外贸易65年的基本线索:变革与增长》,《中国经济史研究》2013年第3期,第23-33页。2 裴长洪:《中国对外贸易60年演进轨迹与前瞻》,《改革》2009年第7期,第5-12页; Eswar Prasad (ed.), China’s Growth and
Integration into the World Economy: Prospects and Challenges,IMF,2004,p.13 UNCTAD, Trade and Development 2017: Regional Cooperation for Development, https://unctad.org/en/pages/PublicationArchive.
and opening-up that has fueled its sustained trade and economic growth (UN, 2007).4
1.1Philosophical and Institutional Evolution on Foreign Trade in ChinaAfter the founding of the People’s Republic of China in 1949, China experienced a development
journey that started with isolation followed by openness and further opening-up in the context of changing domestic and international environments. China’s foreign trade philosophy evolved over different stages, in which imports and exports played different roles.
Stage I (1949-1978): Trade protection at the inception of the founding of the People’s Republic of China. Adopted in September 1949, the Common Program of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference states that “the People’s Republic of China may, on the basis of equality and mutual benefit, restore and develop trade relations with governments and peoples of all countries.” In this stage, China’s economic development relied on its own efforts and domestic market, while foreign aid and trade played a supplementary role. The purpose of foreign trade was to “exchange goods with other countries to make up for each other’s deficiencies.” During this period, China enacted the Interim Regulations on the Administration of Foreign Trade and other administrative rules and regulations, which formed an administrative framework for foreign trade. In this stage, China’s foreign trade system was characterized by state dominance.5 The State and a few trade companies held sway in foreign trade operation and administration. The State enforced strict foreign exchange control and imposed plans on imports and exports in various categories.
Stage II (1978-2001): Trade control was relaxed at the inception of reform and opening-up. The Third Plenum of the 11th CPC Central Committee adopted an overall strategy for reform and opening-up as China’s basic national policy6 and called for “proactively developing equal-footed and mutually beneficial economic cooperation with all countries on the basis of self-reliance and striving to adopt advanced technology and equipment from other countries.” In this stage, the Chinese government vigorously developed imports and exports as an important way to “leverage both domestic and overseas resources, open up both domestic and international markets, and foster skills to develop our economy and international economic relations.” In 1992, the 14th CPC National Congress declared that the goal of China’s economic reform was to establish a socialist market economic system, further reform the foreign trade system, create economic operational mechanisms in line with international rules, and open up on all fronts.7 With the enactment and implementation of the Foreign Trade Law and other laws and regulations, China started to increase its trade openness, created special economic zones and various special customs regulation areas, devolved foreign trade operation rights subject to a new review and approval system, and launched various strategies to pursue market diversification, quality superiority and trade development through technology advancement. These measures led to an improvement in China’s trade volume and quality.
Stage III (2001-2013): Development into a major trading nation. The Outline of the 10th Five-Year Plan identified the “going global” strategy to expand foreign trade. Imports and exports are a vehicle for a country to deepen and broaden its participation in international division of labor and utilize factors and resources on a global scale. After its WTO entry, China amended and enacted its new Foreign Trade Law, Administrative Regulations on the Import and Export of Goods, as well as supporting departmental rules. The foreign trade system continuously improved in a more open, stable and transparent process
4 Murray Gibbs, “Trade Policy”, United Nations Policy Notes, https://esa.un.org/techcoop/documents/pn_tradepolicynote.pdf, 2017, p.13..5 The Common Program of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference states that “China adopts foreign trade control and trade
protection policies”.6 Hu Yaobang: “On External Economic Relations”, speech at the Central Secretariat meeting on January 14 1982, from the Party History Records of
the CPC Central Meetings, http://dangshi.people.com.cn/GB/151935/176588/176597/10556282.html.7 Decisions of the CPC Central Committee on Matters concerning the Establishment of Socialist Market Economic System, adopted at the Third
Plenum of the 14th CPC Central Committee on November 14, 1993.
consistent with market-based economic rules.Stage IV (2013-present): China’s growth as a trading power.8 In the era after the global financial
crisis, China put forward a new concept of creating an open economic system for a new round of opening-up at a higher level. The promotion of imports and exports, which is conducive to mitigating dual pressures from international trade protectionism and domestic economic adjustment, took center stage in China’s diplomacy and economic development. Meanwhile, a swathe of trade policies started to be implemented, including:
The strategy of free trade areas. The Report to the 17th CPC National Congress identified the strategy to create free trade areas for bilateral and multilateral economic and trade cooperation. The Third Plenum of the 18th CPC Central Committee in 2013 called for creating free trade areas along the Belt and Road routes to form a high-standard global network of free trade areas. By the end of 2018, China had signed 17 free trade agreements with 25 countries and regions and created 12 free trade pilot areas for institutional innovation in the field of investment and trade.
The implementation of a proactive import policy helped China rebalance trade. China launched the China International Import Expo, modified the Catalogue of Encouraged Imported Technology and Products, offered import discount interest funds, increased import credit, and improved the import and export structure.
China adopted trade and investment liberalization and facilitation policies in line with international standards. China started to comprehensively implement a pre-access national treatment plus negative list system, substantially eased market access, increased service sector openness, and supported integration of its firms into the global industrial, value and logistical chains.
China began to encourage the new business model. The modes such as cross-border e-commerce and procurement trade grew rapidly and become new growth drivers.
1.2 Growth of China’s Foreign TradeWith its improving foreign trade mechanism and policy implementation, China’s import and export
volumes have been growing over the past seven decades. As Figures 1 and 2 show, China’s foreign trade has been growing by different degrees in 56 out of 70 years since 1949, and its trade growth outpaced the world average in 47 years. After reform and opening-up in 1978, China achieved miraculous trade growth by expanding its openness and taking an active part in the international division of labor and competition in all fields. China’s total import and export volumes reduced only briefly four times, and led the world trade growth in most years.
According to the General Administration of Customs, China’s total import and export volume amounted to 4,622.8 billion U.S. dollars in 2018, up 223 times over 1978, or 14.5% annually. Specifically, China’s export volume grew by 254 times with an annual average growth rate of 14.9%, and its import volume increased by 155 times, up 14.1% annually.9 Yet China’s trade growth also exhibited phase characteristics in different stages due to its different development goals and external environment.
Stage I (1949-1978): China’s foreign trade developed amid apparent volatility. Due to the blockade and embargo imposed by Western countries and its domestic political and economic situations, China adopted an import substitution industrialization (ISI) policy with limited external openness - a common approach among developing economies at the time.10 Under this system, China used imports to meet its needs of industrial production and exports to earn foreign exchange. In about three decades before
8 Li (2018), Pei (2017) and Zhao (2013) et al. believe that after China became a large trading nation, its trade imbalance deteriorated. With poor efficiency and environmental performance of industrial activity, China remained at the bottom of the value chain. Strategic upgrade from a large trading nation to a strong and competitive one marks the overall strategy for China’s trade development in the new era.
9 Calculated based on data from UNCTAD Handbook of Statistics 2018.10 From the 1950s to the early 1980s, import substitution industrialization (ISI) was widely adopted in the developing world, including Latin
America and most African countries, as well as South Korea, Singapore and the Philippines in East Asia (from 1952 the early 1960s).
reform and opening-up in 1978, China’s total import and export volume rose from 1.13 billion US dollars in 1950 to 21.09 billion US dollars in 1978, up 11% annually and slightly below the annual average world trade growth rate of 11.5% (see Figure 2).11 Given the roles of imports and exports, China’s trade imbalance was limited during this period, but its import growth outpaced its export growth in most years. Despite the export growth, China’s exports as a share in total world export volume peaked at 2.69% in 1959 and dropped to 0.76% in 1978. China’s ranking in world export volume also fell from 12th in 1959 to 32nd in 1978.
Stage II (1978-2001): Foreign trade became an important part of China’s economy and maintained rapid growth. After 1978, China became a major destination for the third wave of global industrial relocation. From 1979 to 1991, the Chinese mainland served as a destination for the relocation of light and traditional processing industries from Hong Kong, including fabrics and accessories, toys, clocks, consumer electronics and small home appliances. From 1992 to 2001, China became a destination for the relocation of low-end processing and assembly activities of electronics, communication and computer industries from the Taiwan region, Japan and South Korea. As a result, processing trade became a key form of China’s foreign trade, driven by overseas-funded firms, and underpinned China’s surging export growth.
In 2001, China’s total import and export volume reached 509.65 billion US dollars (accounting for 4% of world trade and ranking sixth globally), up 24 times over 1978 or 15% annually. This growth rate far surpassed the annual world trade growth rate of 7% during the same period.12 In this stage, China’s exports grew by 15.5% on an annual average basis, exceeding its annual average import growth rate of 14.5%. After 1994, China’s exports surpassed imports, leading to trade surplus that lasts till today. Consequently, China’s international reserves have accumulated rapidly. In 1996, China’s foreign exchange reserves exceeded 100 billion US dollars, which increased to 212.16 billion US dollars in 2001.
Figure 1: China’s Foreign Trade Development from 1950 to 2018Notes: Given the exponential growth in China’s foreign trade after 1978, we illustrate China’s foreign trade development in two charts representing two stages.
Source: CEIC China Economic Database.
11 Calculated based on data from UNCTAD Data Center.12 Calculated based on data from UNCTAD Data Center.
Share of China’s trade China’s trade growth rate World trade growth rate
Stage III (2001-2013): Trade developed by leaps and bounds. China’s accession to the WTO in November 2001 marked a new era in China’s trade development characterized by wider and multidimensional openness and an export-oriented economy13. China’s foreign trade dependence, especially export dependence, increased rapidly, exceeding 50% in 2002 and peaking at 67% in 2006, and its export dependence reached 36.9% in the same year. Under such a development model, China’s total foreign trade increased to 4.2 trillion US dollars by 2013 at an annual average growth rate of 19.1%; in comparison, the annual average world trade growth rate was 9.6% during the same period of time. By 2013, China’s share in global trade of goods expanded to 11%, making it the largest goods trading nation in the world. Specifically, China’s export growth rate (19.3%) still outpaced its import growth (18.9%). In 2009, China’s export volume as a share in the world total rose to 9.6%, making it the world’s largest exporter of goods and cementing its position as the “world’s factory.”
Stage IV (2013-present): China’s trade development started to focus on quality upgrade. In the era after the global financial crisis, although China’s status as a major trading nation has strengthened, its economic growth has become less dependent on trade. In 2018, China’s trade dependence was about 33.7%, and its export dependence reached roughly 18.1%.14 With its falling trade dependence, China’s annual trade growth slowed to 2.1% but it was still above the world average of 0.7%. In 2018, China’s total trade volume reached 4.6 trillion US dollars, and its share in global trade climbed to 11.8%.
Figure 2: China in World Trade (1950-2018)Source: UNCTAD Data Center.
13 “Communiqué of the 5th Plenary Session of the 15th Central Committee of the CPC” and ““Communiqué of the 6th Plenary Session of the 15th Central Committee of the CPC”, http://cpc.people.com.cn/GB/64162/64168/64569/65414/index.html
14 NBS: Statistical Communique of the People’s Republic of China on the 2018 National Economic and Social Development, http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/zxfb/201902/t20190228_1651265.html, cited on April 1, 2019.
Meanwhile, China’s exporting industries started to upgrade toward capital- and technology-intensive industries such as equipment manufacturing and technology industries. While maintaining steady export growth, China attached great importance to increasing imports. In 2017 and 2018, China’s imports grew by 16.1% and 15.8%, respectively, substantially outpacing export growth rates during the same period (7.9% and 9.9%, respectively).
Despite trade volatility due to the impact of domestic and international environments over the past seven decades since 1949, China’s foreign trade supported its economic growth and development priorities over different stages, with an annual average growth rate of 13%, far above the world average of 8%. Rapid growth in both imports and exports (12.8% and 13.2%, respectively, compared with the world’s average of both at 8.8% during the same period) turned China into a major trading nation.
2. China’s Qualitative Trade EvolutionFrom 1949 to 2013, the year China became the world’s largest goods trading nation, the country not
only achieved trade growth but improved its trade structure as well. By joining the tide of globalization since reform and opening-up in 1978, China has transformed its trade structure and evolved into a trading powerhouse.
2.1 Pre-Reform Trade StructureUnder its inward-looking development model of import substitution prior to reform and opening-up
in 1978, China’s trade was positioned to maintain its economic independence, and trade functions were relatively uniform. While imports were meant to supply much-needed industrial equipment, the role of export was to earn foreign exchange. In this stage, seeking international recognition was a primary goal of China’s diplomacy, and official trade was restricted to the countries with which it had diplomatic ties. In terms of product structure and flow, China’s trade lacked diversity and developed in a closed loop. With limited export competitiveness, China was yet to exhibit any significant international influence as a large market. Prior to reform and opening-up, therefore, China’s trade was largely isolated from the international division of labor and exogenous from international trade.
Prior to reform and opening-up, China’s import and export structure was in consistent with its industrial growth did. As Figure 3 shows, during this period, China’s exports were dominated by primary products and resource-intensive finished products, with a rising share of finished products. At the inception of the founding of the People’s Republic of China in 1949, agricultural and sideline products represented more than half of China’s exports - a typical trait for agricultural countries, of which the processed agricultural and sideline products accounted for more than three-fifths; industrial and mineral products made up for less than 10%. With the creation of China’s industrial system, the shares of processed agricultural and sideline products and industrial and mineral products surged, peaking at 45.9% and 34.7%, respectively, in 1962.
Subsequently, however, domestic political and economic turbulence dealt a blow to China’s industrial activity, and agricultural produce, byproducts and finished products once again dominated China’s exports. The share of industrial and mineral products in China’s exports declined and did not recover until after 1974. To strike a balance between foreign exchange earnings and the necessity of industrial production, priority was given to the import of industrial raw materials. Capital goods dominated China’s imports before reform and opening-up, with an average share of 80.4%.15 Consumer goods, however, accounted for less than 20% of China’s imports most of the time, with the exception of economic hardships during 1959-1961, when the share of consumer goods in China’s imports briefly expanded, peaking at 44.8% in 1962, which still paled in comparison with the share of capital goods.
15 Calculated based on data from China Statistical Yearbook (1981).
During this period, China’s foreign trade was closely related to its diplomatic situation, as manifested in trade flow, structure and form. At the inception of the founding of the People’s Republic of China, 70% of the Chinese mainland’s imports and exports were with the USSR and other socialist countries like the former Yugoslavia in Eastern Europe through barter trade and transit trade via Hong Kong and Macao. After China started to import grain in 1961, its trade focus shifted toward Western countries, with significant diversification in trade flow and structure and a transition to cash-settled trade.
Before reform and opening-up, China’s trade structure was dominated by domestic production, thus making endogenous factors a major source of shocks. Despite overall stability in the import and export structure, it was difficult for China to realize continuous improvement and upgrade solely on its own strength. Trade growth had a limited effect on the improvement of trade quality.
2.2 Trade Structure after Reform and Opening-upAfter reform and opening-up in 1978, China swiftly became integrated into the international division
of labor. After its accession to the WTO, China emerged as the “world’s factory” and a major market. As China’s trade became increasingly endogenous to the global trading system, its import and export quality improved in sync with its trade growth.
First, China’s trade expansion was accompanied by an improving export structure. Qualitative trade improvement became evident in Stage II, when labor-intensive finished products replaced primary products as China’s main exports. In 1991, the share of primary products in China’s exports dropped to 22.5%, down from 50.3% in 1980, while the share of industrial finished goods rose to 77.5%, up from 49.7% in 1980. Textiles, shoes and other fabrics and accessories became China’s major export products.16
In Stage III, China’s exports upgraded from labor-intensive products to capital-intensive products, with an above-average growth of exports in electromechanical products. In 2003, electromechanical products, for the first time, represented more than 50% of China’s total export value. In 2011, China’s exports of electromechanical products exceeded 1 trillion US dollars.
Figure 3: China’s Foreign Trade Structure (1950-1978)Source: China Statistical Yearbook (1981), China Statistics Press, 1982 Edition.
Industrial and mineral productsProcessed agricultural and sideline productsAgricultural and sideline products
Capital goods Consumer goods
16 Jiang: “Three Decades of China’s Foreign Trade,” China Financial & Economic Publishing House, 2008 Edition.
In Stage IV, China’s exports became even more tech-intensive, with electromechanical products as an export stabilizer. Significant improvement in the level of China’s export technology was accompanied by an upgrade in its product structure. After 1995, resource-intensive products, especially labor-intensive products, decreased proportionally in China’s exports, while the share of technology products increased in relative terms. Since 2002, medium- and high-tech products have represented more than 50% of China’s exports. High-tech products replaced labor-intensive products to become the biggest category of China’s exports (see Figure 4). China’s export sophistication is positively correlated with its increasing export volume. The implication is that after reform and opening-up, trade growth contributed to a qualitative improvement in China’s exports.
Second, China’s import growth drove an improvement in import functions. Around 1978, China’s import structure transformed significantly to meet the needs of China’s industrial development. In Stage II of China’s trade development, processing trade growth was accompanied by a rising share of raw materials and intermediate inputs in China’s imports. In Stage III, raw materials, parts and components, as well as advanced equipment, became China’s major import products. Meanwhile, rapid growth in the import of energy and resource products such as petroleum, iron ore and nonferrous metals undergirded China’s development into a global manufacturing powerhouse. In Stage IV, China experienced robust growth in its consumer power and consumer upgrade, as manifested in spikes in the imports of consumer goods like gold and pearls, along with high-end consumer goods such as pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, dry fruits and nuts.
Another change was the technology composition of imported products. In parallel with rapid growth in the imports of high-tech and primary products since 2000, low-tech and resource-intensive products as a share in China’s imports were reduced substantially (see Figure 5). With its efforts for GATT
Figure 4: Technology Composition of China’s Export ProductsNote: Lall (2000) method is adopted for technology classification.
Source: Calculated by author. Data before 1985 are from the NBER-United Nations trade data 1962-2000, https://cid.econ.ucdavis.edu/nberus.html; data after 1985 are from the World Bank’s World Integrated Trade Solution (WITS, http://wits.worldbank.org/).
membership, China faced diminishing trade barriers and imported a growing share of tech products around 1995. Before and after its WTO accession, China’s trade form shifted toward intra-industry trade. In this stage, import facilitated China’s integration into the global value chain and provided much-needed resources for its industrial development - a consistent function since the founding of the People’s Republic of China in 1949. Moreover, China also started to import bulk commodities and more and more agricultural and sideline products to meet its consumer needs. Such a functional transformation of China’s imports enhanced China’s role as a major supplier and consumer in the global market with increasing influence in world trade.
Third, China’s trade competitiveness increased in tandem with its trade growth. Since 1978, China’s trade volume has increased along with its overall trade competitiveness and improving trade structure. By creating an international competitiveness index for various sectors, Table 1 shows how the competitiveness of various sectors changed along with China’s import and export structure. China reversed its unfavorable competitive position in medium- and high-tech product categories in 2005 and 2006, respectively, and ramped up exports. In the primary product category, however, China’s growing competitive disadvantage resulted in a trade deficit. As a result of its economic restructuring, China’s competitiveness in resource-intensive and low-tech product categories diminished, an indication that China exported fewer and imported more products in these categories.
Figure 5: Technology Composition of China’s Imports (%)Note: Lall (2000) method is adopted for technology classification.
Source: Calculated by author. Data before 1985 are from the NBER-United Nations trade data 1962-2000, https://cid.econ.ucdavis.edu/nberus.html; data after 1985 are from the World Bank’s World Integrated Trade Solution (WITS, http://wits.worldbank.org/).
Fourth, China’s trade expanded in sync with its integration into the global value chain. Since Stage II, processing trade had represented a growing share in China’s exports, and so did the intra-industry trade. The Intra-industry Trade Indices had long been above 0.5 for medium- and high-tech products, above 0.5 for low-tech products before 2005, and above 0.5 for primary products and resource-intensive products before the dawn of the 21st century,17 an indication that intra-industry trade once dominated all sectors. This form of trade later came to dominate the medium- and high-tech product categories,
Figure 6: China’s Global Value Chain Participation IndexSource: OECD-WTO Trade Value-Added Database (TiVA, http://oe.cd/tiva).
Table 1: China’s International Trade Competitiveness Index
Note: Lall (2000) method is adopted for technology classification. International competitiveness index is expressed by the ratio between the net export volume and total trade volume, and the value range is 0~1. Higher value denotes stronger competitiveness.Source: Calculated by author. Data are from the World Bank’s World Integrated Trade Solution (WITS, http://wits.worldbank.org/).
17 Intra-industry trade index = 1-|International competitiveness index|, which reflects internal trade within each product category. When it is greater than 0.5, the implication is more occurrence of intra-industry trade.
suggesting that through participation in international trade, China gradually upgraded its industrial chain. The evolving industrial trade deepened China’s participation in the global value chain (see Figure 6), transforming it into the center of the value chain in Asia18. This further led to a continued growth in China’s imports and exports. In this manner, China benefited from the benign interaction between trade and industrial upgrade.
The improving trade structure enhanced China’s competitiveness in global trade. Overall, China’s trade structural improvement is manifested in the diversification and technology sophistication of its imports and exports, and the functional improvement is reflected in China’s deep integration into the global economy, driven by its colossal imports and exports. In the mutual enhancement between exports and industrial competitiveness, imports have become an important way for China to influence the international market, and both have contributed to China’s transition from a large trading nation to a strong and competitive one.
3. Comparative Perspective on China’s Trade Gap Over the past seven decades of its development, China has achieved significant progress in trade,
both in volume and in quality. China’s status as an increasingly competitive trading power enabled it to form a benign interaction between trade, economic growth and industrial development. By taking the initiative to reduce the dependence on external demand for its economic growth after the dawn of the 21st century, China has exerted a significant influence on the international market while avoiding external economic risks. Yet shocks from China-U.S. trade tensions since 2018 point to structural drawbacks in China’s trade, which set it apart from traditional trading powers.
First, trade imbalance: Since Stage II, China’s export growth long outstripped its import growth until 2017. Robust export growth had allowed China to enjoy international trade surpluses since 1994, which, to some extent, subjected China to the biggest anti-dumping claims since the WTO’s founding in 1995.19 Trade surplus triggered the recent China-U.S. trade frictions. Despite the Chinese government’s repeated pledges that it would not pursue trade surplus and its proactive initiatives to increase import, China still has one of the highest trade surpluses in the world and is the largest source of U.S. trade deficit. China’s trade surplus with the U.S. stems from computers and electronics, electrical equipment, mixed manufacturing, apparels, machinery, furniture, metal products, leather, plastic and rubber products, textiles, among others. China’s trade deficit with U.S. is related to agricultural products, transportation equipment, petroleum and natural gas, waste materials, mineral products and ores, as well as forestry products. Such a typical trade imbalance indicates that China remains at the mid- and down-stream links of the global value chain. Under the conventional international trade accounting system by the flow of finished goods, China’s current account imbalance exaggerates its actual gains from trade and creates an excuse for target countries to resort to trade protection.
Second, regional trade imbalances: China has taken steps to bring its geographical trade flows to a relative equilibrium, but its trade structure is highly heterogeneous. Specifically, China has relative dominance in trade with advanced economies like the U.S., Japan and the EU for finished products. but when it comes to trade with the emerging and developing economies, China’s trade structure is yet to improve. For instance, the Latin American market has seen the fastest growth of trade with China since the dawn of the 21st century, but it is also a major source of anti-dumping claims against China. Countries like Argentina and Brazil are among the top 10 countries with anti-dumping claims against China.
18 As far as the trade pattern is concerned, there are three regional value chains in the world: the Asian value chain, the European value chain and the North American value chain.
19 According to the WTO, by the end of 2017, China made up 23% of the total 5,529 anti-dumping investigations in the world. In comparison, other trading powers such as the U.S., Japan, the EU and Germany only made up 5.1%, 3.9%, 2.2% and 2%, respectively.
Table 2 reveals China’s trade structure with the U.S. and Latin America. Obviously, China’s imports from Latin America are mainly primary products and mineral raw materials, while finished products with different degrees of technology composition make up a lion’s share of China’s exports to Latin America. In comparison, the U.S. imported medium- and high-tech products from Latin America and exported medium- and high-tech products, primary products, and mineral raw materials. By developing a reasonable value chain division of labor in Latin America, the U.S. has increased its actual gains from trade. China’s trade with Latin America, dominated by inter-industry trade, along with the highly concentrated trade goods, has increased potential risks for trade frictions.
Third, trade protection mechanism: The 17th CPC National Congress elevated the development of free trade areas into a national strategy. By the end of April 2019, China had signed 16 free trade agreements involving 24 countries and regions. In comparison, the EU has executed 48 regional trade arrangements. The U.S. network of free trade areas covers a broad scope of regions including China, the U.S., the Caribbean region and some South American and Asian countries. Japan has signed free trade agreements with 15 economies including the EU. Among the free trade deals that have been reached, advanced economies like the U.S. have attached great importance to new international trade issues such as e-commerce, whereas the free trade agreements inked by China are yet to increase the coverage of new trade issues.
4. Conclusions and OutlookOver the past seven decades since 1949, China has achieved tremendous trade growth and structural
improvement, becoming a major trading nation. The Outline of the 13th Five-Year Plan for Economic and Social Development enacted in 2015 identifies China’s development priorities for the subsequent five years, including creating a new pattern and improving the strategic layout and system for opening-up on all fronts, as well as progressing the Belt and Road Initiative.20 By the end of 2016, the Chinese Ministry
Table 2: China-Latin America Trade versus U.S.-Latin America Trade (%)
Import Export
China U.S. China U.S.
Primary products 72.39 17.59 2.96 13.36
Resource-intensive products 1.12 7.92 22.35 6.00
Low-tech products 1.08 3.92 11.61 5.26
Medium-tech products 2.64 37.79 28.29 26.59
High-tech products 5.96 18.25 31.29 20.42
Mineral raw materials 16.55 10.01 1.63 20.23
Others 0.26 4.51 1.87 8.68
Note: Lall (2000) method is employed for technology classification.Source: Calculated by authors. Data are from the World Bank’s World Integrated Trade Solution (WITS, http://wits.worldbank.org/).
20 The Outline of the 13th Five-Year Plan for Economic and Social Development of the People’s Republic of China, http://www.xinhuanet.com//politics/2016lh/2016-03/17/c_1118366322.htm, cited on February 19, 2019.
of Commerce released the 13th Five-Year Plan for Foreign Trade Development, calling for improving China’s trade structure, with a greater focus on quality and competitiveness and enhancing its status as a major trading power.21
Under its new trade strategies, China has accelerated its trade restructuring over recent years. By increasing imports of high-tech products and consumer goods, China is shifting its trade function from being a growth driver to being a way to balance development. Since the announcement of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), China’s trade growth with BRI partners has significantly outstripped its overall trade growth, a testament of China’s increasing initiative in trade promotion. Under its overall trade strategy, China is expected to foster an enhancing cycle between trade growth and structural improvement and strengthen its trade competitiveness. In such, it is expecting to upgrade from a major trading nation to a trading power.
To develop into a trading power, China should make the following efforts to address its structural imbalances:
- Take the initiative to promote trade under the Belt and Road Initiative, implement its free trade strategy in policy communication, and create a broader free trade network and institutional protection framework for steady trade growth and development.
- Keep a proper pace of production chain and value chain adjustments and move towards the upstream links of the global value chain to promote sustainable trade development.
- Further improve the functions of import. Import should not only meet the needs of production and consumption, but it should also serve as a public good. China should offer market opportunities to emerging economies through value chain coordination and assist their industrial development through trade, investment and financing. Industrial development in emerging economies will help China adjust its trade imbalance, reduce external trade risks, and eliminate structural frictions facing regional markets.
- While addressing external risks such as China-U.S. trade frictions, China should take the initiative to promote trade liberalization and facilitation to bring down trade barriers and costs and create a favorable external trade environment.
References:
[1] Hu Angang et al.. 2015. The “13th Five-Year” Strategy. Beijing: The People’s Press.
[2] Jiang Xiaojuan. 2008. “Three Decades of China’s Opening-up: Review and Outlook.” Social Sciences in China, No. 6.
[3] Jin Linbo et al. 2015. China’s Mid-and Long-Term Trigger Strategy. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press.
[4] Li Gang. 2018. “Strategic Pathways for China to Become a Strong Trading Nation.” Journal of International Trade, No.2.
[5] Liu Guoguang, Zhang Zhuoyuan, Dong Zhikai, Wu Li. 2006. Research Report on China’s 10th Five-Year Plan. Beijing: The People’s Press
[6] Pei Changhong, Liu Shuhuai. 2017. “How Can China Become a Trading Power: A New Analytical Approach.” Economic Research Journal, No.5.
[7] Pei Changhong. 2007. “60 Years of China’s Trade Evolution and Outlook.” Reform, No.7.
[8] Pei Changhong. 2009. 60 Years of Foreign Trade for the People’s Republic of China. Beijing: the People’s Press.
[9] Shi Guangsheng. 2013. History of China’s Economic and Trade Reform and Development. Beijing: The People’s Press.
[10] The World Bank. 2011. Growth and Development in the Postcrisis Era: G20 Development Agenda. Beijing: China Financial Publishing House.
[11] Zhao Beiwen. 2013. “China’s Strategic Trade Upgrade: from a Large Trading Nation to a Competitive One.” World Economy Studies, No.4.
21 Ministry of Commerce: 13th Five-Year Plan for Foreign Trade Development, http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2017-01/09/content_5158270.htm, http://www.xinhuanet.com//politics/2016lh/2016-03/17/c_1118366322.htm, cited on February 19, 2019.