8/13/2019 Session 4 Global Enterprise and Competition4374
1/50
Session 4
Global Enterprise and Competition66.511.202Fall 2007
Ashwin Mehta, Visiting Faculty
8/13/2019 Session 4 Global Enterprise and Competition4374
2/50
Session 4
International Strategy,Structure &Integration
Corporate/GlobalStrategy
CorporateStructure &Integration
Business Strategy
BusinessStructure &
Integration
Strategy --- Global to Regional/Local
8/13/2019 Session 4 Global Enterprise and Competition4374
3/50
Session 4
Corporate Strategy FrameworkCorporate strategy
vision, goals, objectives
building and exploitingcorporate advantage(resources)
Value creationone time Vs ongoing(businesses)
Structure, Systems andProcesses
For coordination andcontrol
Industries
8/13/2019 Session 4 Global Enterprise and Competition4374
4/50
Session 4
Hierarchy of Strategy
Corporate
Business
Functional
GrowthStability
RetrenchmentPortfolioParenting
Competitive (Cost, Differentiation)CooperativeBusiness ecosystem
Functional plans &IntegrationLeadership, Followership
8/13/2019 Session 4 Global Enterprise and Competition4374
5/50
Session 4
QUESTIONS OF CORPORATE-LEVEL AND BUSINESS-LEVEL STRATEGY
Corporate-level strategyshould ask
Business-level strategy should ask
In which markets do we competetoday?
In which markets do we want tocompete tomorrow?
How does our ownership of abusiness ensure itscompetitiveness today and in thefuture?
How do we compete in thismarket today?
How will we compete in thismarket in the future?
8/13/2019 Session 4 Global Enterprise and Competition4374
6/50
Session 4
CorporateStrategy
Directional
Portfolio
Parenting --- businesses, build, synergies between businesses
GrowthConcentration
Diversification
Vertical
Horizontal
Concentric
Conglomerate
I nvest
M & A
Alliances
Leveraged Gr owthStability
Retrenchment
---- multiple businesses, products --- analysis to lead to Directional strategyBCG matrix, GE Business Screenmarket share, industry attractivenessQualitative and quantitative
8/13/2019 Session 4 Global Enterprise and Competition4374
7/50Session 4
Growth Strategy Options
1. Organic Growth Investments in assets required to grow
I nvest in f actor ies. Machinery, ski lls, etc.Time to reap benefi ts? Risks? Changing environment
2. Acquisition buy necessary assets --- tangibles andintangibles
Upfr ont payments, Integration issues, unpredictable retur ns
3. Alliances partner with companies to complementTypically Buyer-Seller r elationshipsTightl y coupled relationship, too much legal, li mited flexibil ity
4. Leveraged Growth network of asset owners, orchestratedby A Mobilizer
Loosely coupled relationshipGoverned by market based economic incentives, not legal agr eements
Leveraged Growth: Expanding sales without Sacrificing Profits, John Hagel, HBR 2002
8/13/2019 Session 4 Global Enterprise and Competition4374
8/50Session 4http://www.lifung.com/
8/13/2019 Session 4 Global Enterprise and Competition4374
9/50Session 4
Founded in Guangzhou, the PRC in 1906, the Li & Fung Group is amultinational group of companies driving strong growth in threedistinct core businesses - export sourcing through Li & Fung Limited,distribution through IDS and retailing through CRA and other non-listed entities. The Li & Fung Group has a total staff of over 24,000
across 40 countries worldwide, with a revenues of over US$8.5 billionin 2005.
The Group's export trading arm is Li & Fung Limited one of thelargest export sourcing firm that manages the supply chain of high-volume, time-sensitive consumer goods through its office network inclose to 40 countries.
Li & Fung
http://www.lifung.com/
http://www.lifung.com/http://www.lifung.com/8/13/2019 Session 4 Global Enterprise and Competition4374
10/50Session 4
As a Supply Chain M anager across many producers and countr ies, Li & Fungprovides the conveni ence of a one-stop shop for customers through a TotalValue-Added Package: from product design and development, through r awmaterial and factory sourcing, production planni ng and management, quali ty
assur ance and expor t documentation to shi pping consoli dation.
8/13/2019 Session 4 Global Enterprise and Competition4374
11/50Session 4
An impressive financial performance
(in HK$)
2,005 2,004 2,003 2,002 2,001 2,000 1,999 1,998 1,997 1,996Sales 55,617,374 47,170,601 42,630,510 37,281,360 33,028,575 24,993,018 16,297,501 14,312,618 13,345,722 12,513,857
Y-O-Y% 17.91% 10.65% 14.35% 12.88% 32.15% 53.35% 13.87% 7.24% 6.65%Op Profits 1,884,600 1,556,036 1,251,986 1,137,025 668,985 793,268 595,305 471,921 361,490 302,075% of sales 3.39% 3.30% 2.94% 3.05% 2.03% 3.17% 3.65% 3.30% 2.71% 2.41%
Equity 4,624,801 4,709,435 4,190,473 3,786,469 3,430,781 3,361,916 1,143,221 1,337,485 1,163,644 1,054,894Debt 753,192 509,487 64,094 69,199 65,955 137,642 414,868 397,058 400,000 283,431Debt/Equity 0.16 0.11 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.36 0.30 0.34 0.27
http://www.lifung.com/investor/index.html
8/13/2019 Session 4 Global Enterprise and Competition4374
12/50Session 4
How?
Since its founding, in 1906, Li Fung family owned Tradingcompany
Acting as a broker between manuf actur ers and buyers in ApparelsM argin pressur es as with dir ect l inks between buyers and manufacturers
Mid-1970s remade the company F rom brokerage (connecting 2 points) toan orchestrator connecting and coordinating many dif ferent l inks
of suppl iers and buyersowns no factoriesowns no transportation equipment to ship material in various productionstagesprivil eged access to 7,500 supply and manufactur ing companiesaround the WorldCore competencies: deep knowledge of apparel market
Leverage other companies assets to grow!
8/13/2019 Session 4 Global Enterprise and Competition4374
13/50Session 4
Remaking of the Company
Organization change from traditional geographical to customercentric structures
dedicated divisions serve largest apparel designers (L aur a Ashley,Abercrombie & F inch, L evi Strauss, etc.
other divisions focus on smaller customers
Each division run by lead entrepreneur, with deep understanding ofcustomers needs
kept relatively small $30 to 50 mil l ion in r evenue
Supply side up-to-date information on thousands of supplierscapability and performance
Al locate work across the network; give in-depth f eedback to fur ther i mproveperformance
Knowledge of supply chain makes the Company tailor it to meet thecustomer need .
can begin production withi n hours after r eceiving the order from a customerover the I nternet!
8/13/2019 Session 4 Global Enterprise and Competition4374
14/50
Session 4
Global Value Added
Idea DesignRaw Material
Sourcing
ConsolidationLogistics
QualityControl
Outsourcemfg. to
network ofsuppliers
FindingProduction
Partner
Customernetwork of
retail chains
Customer(Traditional
Trading House)
8/13/2019 Session 4 Global Enterprise and Competition4374
15/50
Session 4
What are the sources of Li & Fungs value added? Providing integrated supply-chain management
through an extensive network Reducing customer inventory
Price and quality control Delivery and logistics management IT network: production and dist. mgmt. Front end: design, engineering, production
planning Back end: quality control, logistics Sourcing, raw materials, components Extensive manufacturing network (3000
factories, over 1 million workers)
8/13/2019 Session 4 Global Enterprise and Competition4374
16/50
Session 4
Creates Li & Fung Distribution More customers in Europe Greater scale and adds production capacity Adds new sources of supply Changes IBS from introducing agent between clients and
manufacturers to a higher margin sourcing company
Import business fills gaps Additional entry into retail Fills in the mosaic by extending sourcing and distribution
networks
What does merger with Inchcape dofor Li & Fungs strategy?
8/13/2019 Session 4 Global Enterprise and Competition4374
17/50
Session 4
Li & Fungs strategy maximizes global valueadded:
Supplier network of quality manufacturers withextensive set of relationships
Li & Fung coordinates supply chain for aspecialized set of a products (textiles, toys)
Customer network of large retail chains(Abercrombie & Fitch, Gymboree)
Li & Fung consolidates demands andconsolidates supplies, establishes prices,coordinates exchange, balances supply anddemand, allocates products.
8/13/2019 Session 4 Global Enterprise and Competition4374
18/50
Session 4
Li & Fungs supplier networks optimize: Gains from trade taking advantage of
economies of scale of suppliers Gains from trade taking advantage of
comparative advantages of countries in thesupply chain constant location adjustment
Costs of trade taking advantage of bestcombination to reduce costs of transactions,transportation, tariffs, and time
Combining elements of supply chain tomaximize gains from trade net of costs of trade
8/13/2019 Session 4 Global Enterprise and Competition4374
19/50
Session 4
Other Examples of Orchastrators
Nike (own process network)
Cisco (Semi Closed Network)
Wal-Mart (Own process network)
Technology Systems Integrators (such asEDS, IBM) created a Global network todeliver solutions
8/13/2019 Session 4 Global Enterprise and Competition4374
20/50
Session 4
Business Strategy Considerations:
Arenas Where will we be active?
Vehicles How do we get there?
Differentiators How will we win?
Staging What speed and sequence?
Economic Logic How will returns be obtained?
8/13/2019 Session 4 Global Enterprise and Competition4374
21/50
Session 4
Evaluating Corporate Strategy --- Five Tests:
VisionInternal ConsistencyExternal Fit
Corporate AdvantageFeasibility
8/13/2019 Session 4 Global Enterprise and Competition4374
22/50
Session 4
Strategy Formulation process
Hierarchy of Strategy---multidimensional view
Corporate Global
Business Regional
Functional Local (Country-level)
8/13/2019 Session 4 Global Enterprise and Competition4374
23/50
Session 4
STRATEGIES FOR DIFFERENT PHASES OF THE INDUSTRY LIFE CYCLE
Decline
Mature
Embryonic
Growth
Phases of industrylife cycle
Arenas Vehicles Differentiators Staging Economic Logic
Local InternaldevelopmentAlliances to securemissing inputs ordistribution access
Target basic needs,minimaldifferentiation
Tactics to gainearly footholds Prices tend to be high.Costs are also highFocus is on securingadditional capital tofund growth phase.
Penetration intoadjacent markets
Alliances forcooperationAcquisitions intargeted markets
Increased effortstowarddifferentiationLow cost leadersemerge throughgaining experienceadvantages and scale
Integrated positions requirechoice of focusingfirst on cost ordifferentiation
Margins can improverapidly because ofexperience and scalePrice premiums accrueto successfuldifferentiators
GlobalizationDiversification
Mergers andacquisitions resultin consolidation
More stable positionsemerge acrosscompetitors
Choosinginternationalmarkets and newindustrydiversification;
need rationalsequencing
Consolidation results infewer competitors(favoring highermargins) but declininggrowth demands cost
containment andrationalization ofoperations.
Some arenas may beabandoned if declineis severeFocus on segmentswhich provide most
profitability
Acquisitions fordiversifying movesDivestitures to exitfor somecompetitors
Rationalizing cost
8/13/2019 Session 4 Global Enterprise and Competition4374
24/50
Session 4
Strategy Formulation process
Hierarchy of Strategy
CorporateBusiness
Functional
8/13/2019 Session 4 Global Enterprise and Competition4374
25/50
Session 4
Functional Strategies
Marketing Technology/Development
Operations Production
Logistics Purchasing
Servicing Human Resource
Finance Information Technology
8/13/2019 Session 4 Global Enterprise and Competition4374
26/50
Session 4
Functional Strategies --- Considerations
Core Competency
Integration
Timing (first mover Vs Follower)
In-house Vs Outsourcing
Strategy Options and Scenarios Evaluation
8/13/2019 Session 4 Global Enterprise and Competition4374
27/50
Session 4
Global Regional Local
Regional teams are the key to Companys Globalizationinitiatives
Jeffrey Immelt, CEO, GE, HBR 12/2005
Global leverage is about playing 3-D chess- at theglobal, regional and local levels
John Manzer, CEO International, Wal-Mart, HBR 12/2005
Regional strategies for Global leadership*
*: Pankaj Ghemawat, HBR 12/2005
8/13/2019 Session 4 Global Enterprise and Competition4374
28/50
Session 4Source: Global Marketing Management, Kotabe and Helsen Session 1
8/13/2019 Session 4 Global Enterprise and Competition4374
29/50
Session 4
LENOVO
http://assets.cambridge.org/97805218/80817/cover/9780521880817.jpg8/13/2019 Session 4 Global Enterprise and Competition4374
30/50
Session 4
How did Lenovos home country affect its initialdevelopment and management strategy?
Domestic strategy-customer focus
Economies of scale and experiencefrom large domestic market
Pricing strategy above domesticcompetitors and belowinternational entrants
Strong domestic brand
Retail outlets and 19 branch offices
Distribution (2000 distributors andresellers)
Yang Yuanqing
Vice Chairman,President and CEO
8/13/2019 Session 4 Global Enterprise and Competition4374
31/50
Session 4
From humblebeginnings
8/13/2019 Session 4 Global Enterprise and Competition4374
32/50
Session 4
PC-Sales in China: Market Shares 1994
Source: Luo, Yadong, Multinationals in China
, Copenhagen 2000
8/13/2019 Session 4 Global Enterprise and Competition4374
33/50
Session 4
Chinese PC-Market (US$ million)
1996 1997 1998 (e)
Import Market 87 157 221
Local Prod. 4,218 5,761 8,114
Exports 439 502 707
Total Market 3,866 5,416 7,628
Imports (US) 32 63 88
8/13/2019 Session 4 Global Enterprise and Competition4374
34/50
Session 4
PC-Sales in China (Millions of Units)
1996 1997 1998 (e
Foreignbrands
0.14 0.21 0.26
US brands 0.65 0.77 0.95
Chinesebrands
1.32 2.05 2.79
Total 2.11 3.03 4.00
8/13/2019 Session 4 Global Enterprise and Competition4374
35/50
Session 4
The Chinese Hardware Market 30% Average Annual
Growth Rate More than 50% of all
buyers buy units between$1,200 and $1,800
What customers value: Personal Relationships After Sales-Service
Tariffs (MFN): 15%To be lowered.
Value-Added Tax: 17%
Market Segmentation byindustry: Finance 33% Telecom 17% Government 10%
Transportation 10% Power/Petrol 4% Education 6% Distribution 4% Manufacturing 8%
Other 8%
8/13/2019 Session 4 Global Enterprise and Competition4374
36/50
Session 4
Did Lenovo derive any advantages/disadvantagesfrom its home country?
Production cost advantage from labor market relativeto international competitors not manufacturing inChina
Government connections compared to global entrants
Local distribution system hard to copy, Continuedtransaction costs for international companies
Would DELLs direct sales approach fit Chineseconsumer market?
8/13/2019 Session 4 Global Enterprise and Competition4374
37/50
Session 4
What threats does Lenovo face, and whatcompetitive advantages were sustainable?
Lowering of trade barriers DELL and other international businesses started producing in
China
DELL offered direct sales and marketing Entrants have global brands Entrants have access to latest technology Other Chinese companies offered low-cost clones Falling component prices affect Legends pricing strategy Growing importance of notebooks
8/13/2019 Session 4 Global Enterprise and Competition4374
38/50
Session 4
How did Legend updateits strategy?
Local tailoring of products andbrands to compete withinternational companies
Partnerships with globalcompanies Launches Lenovo brand Product diversification into cell
phones and other consumer
products
Adjustment of pricing policies Expansion of domestic
distribution Expansion in business services First database server in China
8/13/2019 Session 4 Global Enterprise and Competition4374
39/50
Session 4
Lenovo Notebook
Configuration Soleil8100DT/8200DT
CPU Intel Pentium II266/300MHz(1.7v)
Monitor 14.2" TFT, XGA1024*768*16M
Main Memory 80MB/144MB,expandable to 144MB
2*144Pin DIMM Cache L2Cache 512 KB
24x CD-ROM, USB, PCMCIA,7 pounds
8/13/2019 Session 4 Global Enterprise and Competition4374
40/50
Session 4
Lenovo organization 1999
8/13/2019 Session 4 Global Enterprise and Competition4374
41/50
Session 4
Lenovo Company Structure 2003
8/13/2019 Session 4 Global Enterprise and Competition4374
42/50
Session 4
What were strategic reasons behinddecision to expand internationally?
Greater competitive challenges to domestic marketfrom global companies
Seeking greater economies of scale Chinese manufacturing gives cost advantage that
can be used to expand to global markets Benefits of expanding sales for supporting R&D
Benefits of developing global brand
8/13/2019 Session 4 Global Enterprise and Competition4374
43/50
Session 4
Launching a new global brand.
http://www.legendgrp.com/index.htmlhttp://www.lenovo.com/us/8/13/2019 Session 4 Global Enterprise and Competition4374
44/50
Session 4
Why did Lenovo choose to expand by IBMacquisition?
Lenovo becomes the third largest computer makerin the world Temporary access to IBM brand Access to Thinkpad brand
IBM laptop and PC technology Access to suppliers Increased market power from merger Access to management
http://www.lenovo.com/us/http://www.lenovo.com/us/8/13/2019 Session 4 Global Enterprise and Competition4374
45/50
Session 4
http://www.lenovo.com/us/http://www.lenovo.com/us/8/13/2019 Session 4 Global Enterprise and Competition4374
46/50
Session 4
The IBM acquisition
Separately, Lenovo and the PC Division possessed outstandingdevelopment, manufacturing, marketing and customer-carecapabilities, with different areas of expertise and emphasis in theenterprise and consumer markets.
Together, as the new Lenovo, those strengths are combined into
a growth-oriented, global enterprise, strategically focused on thePC space and more committed to innovation in IT clients thanany other company. We have a passion for innovation that isunique in our industry.
http://www.lenovo.com/us/http://www.lenovo.com/us/8/13/2019 Session 4 Global Enterprise and Competition4374
47/50
Session 4
The IBM
acquisitionChange of headquarters to Purchase, N.Y. Now Raleigh, N.C.William J. AMELIO President andChief Executive Officer
http://www.lenovo.com/us/8/13/2019 Session 4 Global Enterprise and Competition4374
48/50
Session 4
What challenges lie ahead forLenovo?
Lenovo brand products make worldwide debut (3000 family)
Head-to-head competition with HP and Dell
Challenges from low-cost competitors, Acer and others
More?
8/13/2019 Session 4 Global Enterprise and Competition4374
49/50
Session 4
8/13/2019 Session 4 Global Enterprise and Competition4374
50/50
Assignment 2Due November 29, 2007
GO TO THIS LINK http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/business/companies/claiborne_liz_inc/index.html?adxnnl=1&inline=nyt-org&adxnnlx=1186160600-Jqre2Ppd+F3BgUzNGlfiWw
REVIEW THE ARTICLE, DO A WEB RESEARCH ON COMPANIESDISCUSSED IN THE ARTICLE, AND ADDRESS THESE QUESTIONS:
(YOU SHOULD WRITE AN INTRODUCTION/CONTEXT BEFOREADDRESSING THESE QUESTIONS)
1. What was Liz Claiborne value chain prior to Mr. McCombs arrival?Discuss its implications.
2. How is Mr. McComb changing the company directions, why and what arethe implications (include competition implications)?
3. Review Liz Claiborne last 3-year financials (create a common size incomestatement), analyze trends and comment.
4. What are their major business segments? Discuss US Vs Internationalbusiness (including revenues).
YOUR REPORT MUST BE BETWEEN 1000 AND 1500 WORDS AND MUSTINCLUDE SOURCES REFERENCED.