Top Banner
1 Session 20 Just-in-Time Systems Toyota’s JIT system JIT elements Kanban cards Kanban system rules Two card and kanban system rules Toyota MPS policy JIT in purchasing JIT modifications to MRP Planning Impact of the kanban system Concluding principles
18

Session 20 Just-in-Time Systems

Jan 03, 2016

Download

Documents

tamara-burgess

Session 20 Just-in-Time Systems. Toyota’s JIT system JIT elements Kanban cards Kanban system rules Two card and kanban system rules Toyota MPS policy JIT in purchasing JIT modifications to MRP Planning Impact of the kanban system Concluding principles. Toyota’s Production system. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Session 20 Just-in-Time Systems

1

Session 20Just-in-Time Systems

• Toyota’s JIT system– JIT elements– Kanban cards– Kanban system rules– Two card and kanban system rules– Toyota MPS policy

• JIT in purchasing• JIT modifications to MRP Planning• Impact of the kanban system• Concluding principles

Page 2: Session 20 Just-in-Time Systems

2

Toyota’s Production system

Page 3: Session 20 Just-in-Time Systems

3

Kanban Cards

Page 4: Session 20 Just-in-Time Systems

4

Kanban System Rules• Each container of parts must have a kanban card.

• The parts are always pulled. The using department must come to the providing department and not vice versa.

• No parts may be obtained without a conveyance kanban card.

• All containers contain their standard quantities and only the standard container for the part can be used.

• No extra production is permitted. Production can only be started on receipt of a production kanban card.

• Container sizes are kept small and standard, e.g., no container should have more than 10% of a day’s requirements.

Page 5: Session 20 Just-in-Time Systems

5

Flow of Kanban Cards

Page 6: Session 20 Just-in-Time Systems

6

Toyota MPS policy

• One year production plan

• MPS is a three month final assembly schedule

• MPS first month is frozen

• MPS stated in daily buckets

• The daily schedule is equal for each day in the month

• A level, stable MPS schedule is critical

Page 7: Session 20 Just-in-Time Systems

7

JIT Purchasing

• Stable schedules critical

• Prune the number of vendors

• Don’t shift the burden of inventory to the vendors

• Help vendors implement JIT in their operations

• Keep the relationship with vendors simple

Page 8: Session 20 Just-in-Time Systems

8

JIT Modifications to MRP Planning

Develop the MRP record for the faucet subassembly (part no. 356) shown in the following bill of material. The refrigerators are assembled at the rate of 480/period, lead time is one period. there's no safety stock, lot size is 500, and 200 units are in inventory at the moment. (Note: The faucet subassembly is only used on every fourth refrigerator.)

Page 9: Session 20 Just-in-Time Systems

9

Faucet SubassemblyMRP Record

1 2 3 4 5 6 7120 120 120 120 120 120 120

Projected Available Balance 200 80 460 340 220 100 480 360500 500

lot size = 500, safety stock = 0, lead time = 1

WeekGross requirementsScheduled Receipts

Planned Order Release

Page 10: Session 20 Just-in-Time Systems

10

Phantoming

Suppose that the faucet subassembly has been “phantomed” (i.e. the faucet would be assembled onto the refrigerator directly from the bracket, faucet, and tubing parts).

a. What would the bill of material look like now?b. Construct the phantom MRP record and compare it

to the initial MRP record for this item.c. Construct the MRP record for the bracket (lot size =

200 no safety stock, 250 on hand, lead time = 2 periods).

Page 11: Session 20 Just-in-Time Systems

11

Faucet Subassembly– “Phantomed”

Page 12: Session 20 Just-in-Time Systems

12

Faucet Subassembly– “Phantomed”

b. MRP record for facet subassembly, Part No. 356, as a phantom bill of material.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7120 120 120 120 120 120 120

Projected Available Balance 200 80 0 0 0 0 0 040 120 120 120 120 120

lot size = Lot-for-lot, safety stock = 0, lead time = 0

WeekGross requirementsScheduled Receipts

Planned Order Release

Page 13: Session 20 Just-in-Time Systems

13

Faucet Subassembly– “Phantomed”

c. MRP record for Bracket

1 2 3 4 5 6 740 120 120 120 120 120

Projected Available Balance 250 250 210 90 170 50 130 10200 200

lot size = 200, safety stock = 0, lead time = 2

WeekGross requirementsScheduled Receipts

Planned Order Release

Page 14: Session 20 Just-in-Time Systems

14

Impact of the Kanban System

The Bragg Company is considering implementing a JIT program using kanbans to signal the movement and production of product. They want to evaluate the cost savings in inventory investment for a sample component. Their current production philosophy calls for producing 5,000 units at a time and the average usage is 200 units per day. They are considering using kanbans with a container size of 100 units, no safety stock, and manufacturing lead time is 10 days. The cost of the sample component is $140.

Page 15: Session 20 Just-in-Time Systems

15

Impact of the Kanban System

a. What is the company's current investment in WIP? (Assume average inventory is Q/2.)

Unit cost $140.00 Lot Size (Q) 5000 units

Q/2 x $140.00 = 5,000/2 x $140.00 = $350,000

Page 16: Session 20 Just-in-Time Systems

16

Impact of the Kanban Systemb. What will be the company's investment in WIP if it goes to the proposed

JIT system? What is the percentage decrease or increase WIP investment?

Lead Time 10 days Unit cost $140.00 Usage 200 Container Size 100 Safety stock 0 Kanbans 20

20 kanbans x 100 units x $140.00 = $280,000.00

$350,000.00 - $280,000.00 x 100 = 20% $350,000.00

Page 17: Session 20 Just-in-Time Systems

17

Impact of the Kanban Systemc. Process engineers have told management that they can reduce lead time

from 10 days to 5 days if they convert to the proposed JIT system and spend $100,000 on process improvement. Is it worth the additional investment compared to part b?

Lead Time 5 daysUnit cost $140.00Usage 200Container Size 100Safety stock 0Kanbans 10

10 kanbans x 100 units x $140.00 = $140,000.00 (vs. $280,000 for 10 day LT)

Since it cost $100,000 to make the improvement which will lead to a $140,000 reduction in WIP investment it is worthwhile.

Page 18: Session 20 Just-in-Time Systems

18

Concluding principles• Stabilizing leveling the production schedules are prerequisites to

effective JIT systems.

• Achieving very short lead times supports better customer service and responsiveness.

• Reducing hidden factory costs can be at least as important as reducing costs more usually attributed to factory operations.

• Implementing the whole person concept reduces distinctions between white- and blue-collar workers and taps all persons' skills for improving performance.

• JIT is not incompatible with MRP-based systems. Firms can evolve toward JIT from MRP-based systems, adopting JIT as much or as little as they want, with an incremental approach.