Page 1
www.elsevier.com/locate/ejim
European Journal of Internal Medicine 15 (2004) 231–237
Original article
Serum lipids and estrogen receptor gene polymorphisms in male-to-female
transsexuals: effects of estrogen treatment
Manuel Sosaa,b,*, Esteban Jodarc, Elena Arbeloa, Casimira Domınguezd, Pedro Saavedraa,Armando Torrese, Eduardo Salidoe, J.M. Liminanaa, Marıa Jesus Gomez de Tejadaf,
Diego Hernandezb
aGroup of Investigation on Osteoporosis and Bone Metabolic Diseases, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, SpainbBone Metabolic Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University Insular Hospital, Las Palmas, Spain
cBone Metabolism Unit, Endocrinology Service, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, SpaindDepartment of Biochemistry, Hospital Dr. Negrın, Las Palmas, Spain
e Investigation Unit, Hospital University, University of La Laguna, La Laguna, Tenerife, Canary Islands, SpainfBone Metabolic Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Seville, Seville, Spain
Received 14 October 2003; received in revised form 2 March 2004; accepted 18 March 2004
Abstract
The effects of chronic administration of estrogens on the lipid profile in males are not fully understood. We have studied the effect of
chronic administration of estrogens on the lipid profile in a group of transsexual (TS) Canarian men who were taking estrogens and anti-
androgens for a minimum of 3 years. In this cross-sectional study of cases (n = 27) and controls (n = 26), plasma lipid profile and selected
biochemical and hormonal features were studied. TS subjects had shorter stature than controls, and, after adjusting for height and weight, we
found that they had lower values of serum free testosterone (FT) and higher estradiol (E2) levels than controls. The TS group had lower total
and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and lower apoprotein B (Apo B) levels than the control group. Biochemistry was similar in
both groups. The distribution of estrogen receptor gene polymorphisms (ER-Pvu and ER-Xba) was also similar in both groups. Serum Apo B
concentration was related to ER-Xba polymorphism. No other association between lipid profile and the distribution of ER-Pvu and ER-Xba
was found. We conclude that the chronic administration of estrogens in men could produce an increase in serum estradiol, a decrease in free
testosterone levels, and a reduction in total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, and Apo B levels. The ER-Xba polymorphism may influence the
Apo B response to exogenous estrogen in males.
D 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Lipids; Transsexuals; Estrogen receptor gene polymorphism; Estrogens
1. Introduction performed in postmenopausal women. In both the heart and
Estrogen raises plasma levels of high-density lipoprotein
(HDL) cholesterol, an effect that has been related in the past
to the lower rates of coronary heart disease (CHD) in
premenopausal women and in postmenopausal women re-
ceiving estrogen replacement therapy [1]. This perception
recently changed after the publication of two large studies
0953-6205/$ - see front matter D 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.ejim.2004.04.009
* Corresponding author. Department of Clinical and Surgical
Sciences, Bone Metabolic Unit, Centre of Health Sciences, University
of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Apartado 550, 35080 Las Palmas de
Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Canary Islands, Spain. Tel.: +34-928-451-456;
fax: +34-928-451-428.
E-mail address: [email protected] (M. Sosa).
estrogen/progestin replacement study (HERS) [2] and the
Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) [3,4] studies, the changes
found in lipid levels with hormone therapy were not predic-
tive of CHD outcomes in women with heart disease. Estro-
gen plus progestin did not confer cardiac protection; rather,
the combination increased the risk of CHD among generally
healthy postmenopausal women, especially during the first
year after the initiation of hormone use. Because of this, the
authors concluded that this treatment should not be pre-
scribed for the prevention of cardiovascular disease.
Nevertheless, there is considerable variation in the re-
sponse of HDL-cholesterol levels to endogenous or exoge-
nous estrogens, and among postmenopausal women with
prevalent coronary artery disease, several estrogen receptor
Page 2
M. Sosa et al. / European Journal of Internal Medicine 15 (2004) 231–237232
gene polymorphisms have shown an augmented response of
HDL-cholesterol to hormone replacement therapy [5].
In healthy men too, estrogen levels could be a predictor of
plasma HDL-cholesterol [6]. HDL-cholesterol concentra-
tions decrease during adolescence in males in association
with increasing pubertal maturation and free testosterone via
decreased Apo AI and Apo AII levels [7]. Long-term
testosterone replacement in hypogonadal men is associated
with a decrease in plasma HDL-cholesterol and Apo AI
concentrations in some studies [8], although there are nu-
merous reports that endogenous testosterone in men, partic-
ularly in aging, is associated with HDL-cholesterol. Indeed,
testosterone can be converted into estrogen in vivo, which
makes it difficult to separate the effects of either hormone.
Nevertheless, the effects of exogenous estrogens in males
are not fully understood. Some studies have been done in
transsexuals (TS) treated with estrogens for prostate cancer.
Non-gonadectomized, male-to-female transsexuals are an-
other good model to study the effect of estrogen and anti-
androgen treatment in male subjects, although gonadecto-
mized male-to-female transsexuals, in whom the results are
not confounded by the use of anti-androgen, are probably
even better.
The purpose of this study was to examine the lipid profile
in a population of non-gonadectomized, male-to-female
transsexuals treated with estrogens and anti-androgens for
at least 3 years. We also looked at the potential role of the
estrogen receptor gene polymorphisms (ER-Pvu and ER-
Xba, also known as estrogen receptor 1, ESR1) in the
response to this therapy.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Study subjects
Fifty-three men, aged 30–59 years, were enrolled in the
study between December 1999 and July 2000 in Gran
Canaria, Canary Islands (Spain), and divided into two groups.
Group 1 consisted of 27 non-gonadectomized, male-to-
female transsexuals who were on estrogen therapy for
201F108 months (range 3–35 years). The most common
formulations used were contraceptive pills (ethynyl estra-
diol + cyproterone acetate or levonorgestrel), oral estrogens
(conjugated equine), and depot estrogens (estradiol valerate
or mestranol + norethisterone). The doses were mostly in the
pharmacological, rather than in the physiological, range.
Most subjects had used more than one form of therapy, with
frequent use of anti-androgens (cyproterone acetate). Trans-
sexuals were identified through a network of contacts.
Group 2 consisted of 26 healthy men without any intake
of estrogens (control group). They were enrolled in a
random manner as part of other epidemiological studies
performed in our unit.
All patients were Caucasian. No patient was taking
calcium supplements, vitamin D preparations, or other
medications that might affect bone mineral density. None
of the patients had a history of alcoholism, Paget’s disease,
metabolic bone disease, hepatic or renal disorders, or any
other major medical condition. TS patients with a history of
chronic hepatitis, HIV infection, or gonadectomy were
excluded. All patients were informed about the nature of
the study and gave written informed consent. The ethical
review committee of the Hospital University Insular ap-
proved the study, which was conducted in accordance with
the guidelines proposed in the Declaration of Helsinki.
2.2. Questionnaire and physical examination
A previously standardized questionnaire concerning es-
trogen intake and previous diseases and medications that
influence bone density was completed [9]. A complete
physical examination was carried out. Breast development
was graded according to Tanner’s staging. Body mass index
(BMI) was obtained from the equation BMI = body weight/
height2 (kg/m2).
2.3. Sample collection and analytical methods
Serum and urine specimens were obtained after an
overnight fast. Blood was collected without any additives
between 8:00 and 9:00 a.m. After centrifugation at 1500� g
for 10 min, serum was aliquoted and frozen at � 20 jCwithin 1 h of phlebotomy until the biochemical analyses
were performed. Urine samples were collected and stored at
� 20 jC until analysis. Urine creatinine concentrations were
measured with an automated colorimetric method. Serum
glucose, urea, creatinine, inorganic phosphorus, total calci-
um, and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) were determined on a
dry slide chemistry analyzer (Kodak Ektachem Analyzer,
Rochester, NY). Serum total cholesterol and triglyceride
concentrations were also determined by Kodak Ektachem
dry chemistry. Serum HDL-cholesterol was measured with
the use of heparin-manganese precipitation [10]. Low-den-
sity lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol concentration was calcu-
lated using the Friedewald equation [11]. Apolipoprotein A-
1 (Apo A-1) and apoprotein B (Apo B) were determined by
immunoturbidimetry using a Cobas-Fara II clinical analyzer
(Montclair, NJ, USA). The intra- and interassay coefficients
of variation (CVs) were 1.5% and 2.1%, 2.0% and 2.6%,
1.2% and 2.9%, 1.4% and 3.4%, and 1.4% and 5.2%, for
total cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL-cholesterol, Apo A-1,
and Apo B, respectively.
2.3.1. Hormones
RIA kits were used to analyze serum luteinizing hormone
(LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone [(FSH), CIS Bio
International, France]. The lower limit of the assay is 0.15
mIU/ml for LH and 0.1 mIU/ml for FSH. Serum free
testosterone (FT) and estradiol (E2) were determined by
RIA coat-a-count (Diagnostic Product, USA). The lower
detection limit was 0.15 pg/ml for testosterone and 20 pg/ml
Page 3
Table 1
General characteristics of the subjects studied (meanF S.D.) and
distribution of certain risk factors for osteoporosis
Transsexuals Controls p
Age (years) 43.0F 7.7 44.0F 6.0 0.6
Height (cm) 169.0F 6.3 174.1F 7.3 0.01
Weight (kg) 74.3F 13.8 81.3F 12.9 0.05
Body mass
index
(kg/m2)
26.0F 4.7 26.7F 3.7 0.5
Actual
calcium
intake
(mg/day)
773.9F 257.9 652.1F 265.6 0.12
Odds ratio; CI 95%
Physical activity during leisure time
Active 36% 48% 0.609; 0.345, 1.073
Sedentary 64% 52%
Tobacco
Yes 48% 40% 1.384; 0.790, 2.424
No 52% 60%
Alcohol consumption
Yes 68% 72% 0.826; 0.450, 1.514
No 32% 28%
Drug consumption
Yes 37.5% 0% NP
No 62.5% 100%
NP: not performed because none of the controls admitted taking drugs.
M. Sosa et al. / European Journal of Inte
for estradiol. The intra- and interassay CVs were 3.1% and
5.9%, 2.7% and 6.8%, 4.0% and 5.5%, and 6.5% and 9.7%
for LH, FSH, FT, and E2, respectively.
Table 2
Biochemical values, lipid levels, and hormone levels in the groups studied
Transsexuals Con
Biochemistry
Urea (mg/dl) 34.8F 8.6 38
Creatinine (mg/dl) 0.8F 0.2 0
Glucose (mg/dl) 97.2F 15.5 99
Calcium (mg/dl) 9.1F 0.4 9
Phosphate (mg/dl) 3.0F 0.5 3
Uric acid (mg/dl) 4.7F 1.1 5
Total proteins (g/l) 7.228F 0.349 7.34
Lipids
Total cholesterol (mg/dl) 184.2F 40.7 222
Triglycerides (mg/dl) 114.5F 55.4 132
HDL-cholesterol (mg/dl) 46.0F 14.3 49
LDL-cholesterol (mg/dl) 119.4F 38.6 144
Apoprotein A (mg/dl) 138.6F 69.7 147
Apoprotein B (mg/dl) 85.8F 28.2 106
Hormones
LH (mIU/ml) 4.5F 3.3 3
FSH (mIU/ml) 6.0F 4.4 5
Free testosterone (pg/ml) 9.6F 9.3 17
Estradiol (pg/ml) 175.9F 252.8 42
* p of comparisons adjusted for weight and height.
2.3.2. Polymorphisms of the estrogen receptor gene
DNA was purified from 3 ml of blood containing EDTA
using proteinase K digestion, phenol extraction, and ethanol
precipitation. To determine the polymorphic sequences in
the first intron of ER, a 1300-bp DNA fragment was
amplified with primers ER-1: 5V-CTGCCACCCTATCTG-TATC-3V and ER-2: 5V-ACCCTGGCGTCGATTATCTG-3V at 94 jC (1 min), 56 jC (1 min), and 72 jC (2 min) at
30 cycles. Ten microliters of the amplification product was
digested with either 5 U PvuII or 5 U XbaI (New England
Biolabs) at 37 jC for 3 h and products were resolved by
electrophoresis in 2% agarose gels. The ER p allele (PvuII
digestion) was observed as two bands of 1000 and 300 bp,
while the P allele remained as a single 1300-bp band.
Similarly, the ER x allele (XbaI digestion) was observed
as two bands of 900 and 400 bp, while the X allele remained
as a single 1300-bp band.
2.4. Statistical analysis
All results were expressed as meanF S.D. unless other-
wise indicated. A p-level below 0.05 was considered sig-
nificant. First we applied the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test to
ascertain the normal distribution of the parameters studied.
Then, we compared general characteristics of TS and con-
trols using Student’s t-test. For categorical variables, we
applied the chi-square test and calculated the odds ratios. To
make comparisons between multiple groups, we used the
Scheffe and Student’s–Neuman–Keuls tests. All of the
comparisons were made after regression adjustment by
weight and height. Finally, we performed the Pearson
correlation test to study the correlations between lipid
rnal Medicine 15 (2004) 231–237 233
trols p Unadjusted p Adjusted*
.5F 19.2 0.01 0.03
.9F 0.1 0.009 0.08
.2F 14.7 0.6 0.5
.3F 0.4 0.4 0.6
.3F 0.4 0.2 0.3
.3F 1.5
4F 0.451 0.3 0.2
.4F 32.5 0.002 0.05
.6F 104.2 0.4 0.3
.1F 9.7 0.4 0.6
.0F 28.7 0.04 0.03
.6F 22.8 0.6 0.1
.3F 21.9 0.05 0.05
.7F 1.5 0.3 0.3
.4F 2.0 0.6 0.1
.5F 4.2 0.01 0.001
.0F 13.2 0.02 0.01
Page 4
Table 3
Polymorphisms of VDR and ER-Pvu/ER-Xba: analysis of gene frequency
Transsexuals (%) Controls (%) p
ER-Pvu-1
PP 14.8 16.0 0.306
Pp 44.4 52.0
pp 40.7 32.0
ER-Xba
XX 3.7 12.0 0.296
Xx 48.1 48.0
xx 48.1 40.0
M. Sosa et al. / European Journal of Internal Medicine 15 (2004) 231–237234
fractions and hormones, both in TS and in controls. All
studies were performed using SPSS, version 11.0 (SPSS, IL,
USA).
3. Results
Table 1 shows the general characteristics of both groups.
TS subjects were shorter and lighter in weight than controls.
Because of this, all of the statistical studies performed were
done after adjusting for these two parameters. Nevertheless,
the BMI was comparable in both groups. No significant
differences were found between the TS and control groups
with regard to physical activity during leisure time or to
tobacco and alcohol consumption. Indeed, the actual calci-
um intake was similar in both groups. Some 37.5% of TS
subjects had a history of regular drug consumption, mainly
cannabis and cocaine, while none of the control subjects
admitted having this habit. Gynecomastia equivalent to
Table 4
Comparison of lipid and hormonal values between transsexuals and controls, dep
Variable Polymorphisms
pp pP/Pp
Transsexuals
Total cholesterol (mg/dl) 175.3F 37.8 200.1FHDL-cholesterol (mg/dl) 42.5F 10.3 50.6FLDL-cholesterol (mg/dl) 107.6F 22.8 137.4FApoprotein A (mg/dl) 138.5F 55.5 137.2FApoprotein B (mg/dl) 102.9F 19.4 78.1FTriglycerides (mg/dl) 96.8F 47.5 130.4FFree testosterone (pg/ml) 11.5F 10.1 8.8FEstradiol (pg/ml) 139.7F 55.9 168.8F
Controls
Total cholesterol (mg/dl) 209.2F 25.2 232.8FHDL-cholesterol (mg/dl) 56.0F 9.3 45.2FLDL-cholesterol (mg/dl) 140.0F 20.6 152.7FApoprotein A (mg/dl) 159.1F 20.8 139.5FApoprotein B (mg/dl) 95.3F 12.1 118.1FTriglycerides (mg/dl) 66.0F 19.3 151.5FFree testosterone (pg/ml) 16.2F 3.3 17.5FEstradiol (pg/ml) 40.0F 13.7 40.7F
a SNK: Student’s–Newman–Keuls test.
Tanner II–III was present in all TS subjects without breast
implants.
Biochemical data, including hormone levels, are pre-
sented in Table 2. Not surprisingly, TS subjects had lower
free testosterone levels and higher estradiol levels than
controls. Serum urea and creatinine were also lower in TS
subjects. When biochemical data were adjusted for weight
and height, the differences between the TS and control
groups with regard to free testosterone, estradiol, and urea
were maintained, while the difference in creatinine levels
disappeared. Plasma lipids showed a more favorable profile
in TS subjects after adjusting for weight and height, with
lower total and LDL-cholesterol and Apo B lipoprotein
concentrations.
The prevalence of the ER-Pvu and ER-Xba polymor-
phisms in our population is shown in Table 3. As expected,
no significant differences in the distribution of ER-Pvu/ER-
Xba polymorphisms were found between patients and con-
trols. There was no segregation of the phenotype with any of
the genotypes.
Table 4 shows the comparison of lipid values in TS and
controls, depending on the Pvu estrogen receptor polymor-
phism. To make a comparison between several groups, we
applied both the Student’s–Newman–Keuls test and the
Scheffe tests. We found no statistical differences between
total cholesterol, its subfractions, triglycerides, Apo A, Apo
B, estradiol, or free testosterone in TS and controls and their
Pvu estrogen receptor polymorphism, with the only excep-
tion of triglycerides in controls.
Table 5 shows the comparison of lipid and hormonal
values between TS and controls, depending on the Xba
estrogen receptor polymorphism. We found only three
ending on the Pvu estrogen receptor polymorphism
p values adjusted
PP(SNKa/Scheffe)
31.7 157.3F 64.5 0.211/0.240
17.4 39.6F 8.7 0.504/0.535
38.6 97.3F 52.1 0.278/0.308
98.5 142.5F 21.9 0.996/0.996
30.6 67.3F 33.6 0.300/0.329
64.5 103.0F 33.0 0.607/0.634
9.6 8.2F 8.1 0.242/0.272
98.4 197.9F 69.6 0.138/0.161
37.0 219.7F 29.8 0.431/0.463
8.4 45.7F 8.3 0.114/0.135
32.8 133.7F 34.5 0.525/0.555
22.4 132.0F 23.6 0.564/0.545
17.1 88.4F 15.4 0.433/0.521
90.8 202.0F 170.0 0.05/0.07
3.4 19.5F 7.1 0.327/0.360
10.4 50.8F 20.4 0.341/0.374
Page 5
Table 5
Comparison of lipid and hormonal values between transsexuals and
controls, depending on the Xba estrogen receptor polymorphism
Variable Polymorphism p-value
xx xX and XX
Transsexuals
Total cholesterol (mg/dl) 175.0F 35.4 190.3F 44.3 0.425
HDL-cholesterol (mg/dl) 41.3F 9.5 48.8F 16.3 0.329
LDL-cholesterol (mg/dl) 112.5F 23.6 124.1F 46.9 0.587
Apoprotein A (mg/dl) 137.6F 48.1 139.5F 88.6 0.966
Apoprotein B (mg/dl) 105.3F 17.7 66.4F 23.1 0.017
Triglycerides (mg/dl) 95.0F 44.3 127.5F 59.9 0.206
Free testosterone (pg/ml) 9.3F 10.1 8.8F 9.6 0.916
Estradiol (pg/ml) 128.1F 45.1 261.2F 115.8 0.281
Controls
Total cholesterol (mg/dl) 209.3F 34.5 239.4F 25.8 0.052
HDL-cholesterol (mg/dl) 52.2F 11.0 48.3F 8.9 0.448
LDL-cholesterol (mg/dl) 132.7F 28.0 154.6F 28.4 0.443
Apoprotein A (mg/dl) 151.8F 23.5 143.8F 24.0 0.531
Apoprotein B (mg/dl) 98.0F 20.5 121.7F 17.1 0.037
Triglycerides (mg/dl) 99.7F 70.8 170.6F 138.5 0.191
Free testosterone (pg/ml) 15.9F 3.7 18.0F 2.9 0.459
Estradiol (pg/ml) 38.4F 12.8 40.9F 11.0 0.651
M. Sosa et al. / European Journal of Internal Medicine 15 (2004) 231–237 235
controls and no TS with the polymorphism XX, so we
decided to group them all into two groups, group I had only
the xx polymorphism and group II had xX and XX poly-
morphisms. The xx polymorphism was associated with
higher Apo B levels in control males and with lower Apo
B levels in male-to-female TS.
Table 6 shows the correlation between lipids and hor-
mones in TS. We found positive correlations between Apo
A and HDL-cholesterol and between Apo A and serum
estradiol and a statistically significant negative correlation
between estradiol and LDL-cholesterol.
Finally, in Table 7, we present the correlation between
lipids and hormones in controls. In this group, we found no
statistically significant correlations between estradiol and
lipids, and the correlations found were between lipids. Thus,
Table 6
Correlations between lipids and hormones in group 1 (transsexuals)
Total cholesterol HDL-cholesterol LDL-cholest
Total cholesterol –
HDL-cholesterol r = 0.424 –
p= 0.340
LDL-cholesterol r = 0.728 r =� 0.294 –
p= 0.06 p= 0.52
Triglycerides r = 0.588 r = 0.523 r = 0.129
p= 0.16 p= 0.22 p= 0.782
Apo A r = 0.224 r = 0.942 r =� 0.459
p= 0.620 p= 0.001 p= 0.30
Apo B r = 0.706 r = 0.140 r = 0.666
p= 0.07 p= 0.763 p= 0.10
Estradiol r =� 0.340 r = 0.635 r =� 0.865
p= 0.45 p= 0.125 p= 0.01
Free testosterone r = 0.202 r =� 0.364 r = 0.468
p= 0.66 p= 0.42 p= 0.28
we found a very good correlation between total cholesterol
and LDL-cholesterol, between HDL-cholesterol and trigly-
cerides, between HDL-cholesterol and Apo A, between total
cholesterol and Apo B, between LDL-cholesterol and Apo
B, and, finally, between triglycerides and Apo A.
4. Discussion
The effect of oral contraceptives on serum lipid values in
normal women depends upon the estrogen dose and the
androgenicity of the progestin. In general, serum triglycer-
ide concentrations increase slightly, but there are no consis-
tent changes in serum HDL or LDL lipoprotein cholesterol
concentrations. The estrogen component of oral contracep-
tives increases serum triglycerides and HDL concentrations
and lowers serum LDL-cholesterol concentrations. These
potentially favorable effects, which could contribute to a
beneficial effect of estrogen on cardiovascular risk [12,13],
have been under discussion since the publication of the
results of the HERS and WHI studies in postmenopausal
women [2–4]. It was a common belief that estrogen
replacement therapy in postmenopausal women had a fa-
vorable effect on coronary risk by changing the lipid profile,
i.e., mainly reductions in LDL-cholesterol (15%) and lipo-
protein A (20%) and elevations in HDL-cholesterol (10–
15%) and triglycerides (24%) [1,14]. However, the unfa-
vorable results found have since produced profound changes
in the use of hormone replacement therapy [15].
In healthy men, estrogen levels are also the main pre-
dictors of plasma HDL-cholesterol [6], with puberty being
associated with a decrease in HDL-cholesterol [7] and the
hypogonadal state associated with an increase in plasma
HDL-cholesterol and Apo AI concentrations [8]. Lipopro-
tein analysis from a male subject with estrogen insensitivity
syndrome showed relatively low levels of total, LDL-, and
HDL-cholesterol, Apo AI, and lipoprotein A, but normal
levels of triglycerides and pre-beta-1-HDL cholesterol.
erol Triglycerides Apo A Apo B Estradiol
–
r = 0.321 –
p= 0.48
r =� 0.384 r = 0.153 –
p= 0.93 p= 0.74
r = 0.233 r = 0.771 r =� 0.419 –
p= 0.61 p= 0.04 p= 0.34
r =� 0.072 r =� 0.509 r = 0.257 r =� 0.681
p= 0.87 p= 0.242 p= 0.57 p = 0.09
Page 6
Table 7
Correlations between lipids and hormones in group 2 (controls)
Total cholesterol HDL-cholesterol LDL-cholesterol Triglycerides Apo A Apo B Estradiol
Total cholesterol –
HDL-cholesterol r = 0.295 –
p= 0.32
LDL-cholesterol r = 0.959 r = 0.210 –
p= 0.000 p= 0.49
Triglycerides r = 0.157 r =� 0.616 r = 0.012 –
p= 0.60 p= 0.02 p= 0.96
Apo A r = 0.395 r = 0.818 r =� 0.055 r =� 0.508 –
p= 0.89 p= 0.001 p= 0.85 p= 0.07
Apo B r = 0.830 r =� 0.112 r = 0.806 r = 0.436 r =� 0.107 –
p= 0.000 p= 0.71 p= 0.001 p= 0.136 p= 0.72
Estradiol r = 0.159 r = 0.056 r = 0.144 r = 0.026 r =� 0.283 r =� 0.132 –
p= 0.603 p= 0.85 p= 0.63 p= 0.931 p= 0.34 p= 0.66
Free testosterone r =� 0.087 r =� 0.051 r =� 0.101 r = 0.052 r = 0.215 r = 0.192 r = 0.007
p= 0.77 p= 0.86 p= 0.74 p= 0.86 p= 0.480 p= 0.52 p= 0.98
M. Sosa et al. / European Journal of Internal Medicine 15 (2004) 231–237236
More interestingly, premature coronary artery disease was
discovered in this male patient with a disruptive mutation in
the estrogen receptor gene [16]. In fact, animal models have
shown that the atheroprotective effects of estradiol are
mediated mainly by ER-1 [17].
The administration of tamoxifen to healthy boys with
pubertal gynecomastia produced moderate, but significant,
decreases in total cholesterol and lipoprotein(a) [18]. Yet,
previous studies on the effects of estrogens on lipids in
males are scarce. Estrogen reduced serum levels of trigly-
cerides and LDL-cholesterol in one hypercholesterolemic
male with very low LDL-receptor activity, at least in part,
via an increase in LDL-receptor activity [19].
Non-gonadectomized, male-to-female TS represent a
good model for studying the effects of estrogens in males.
We have shown that these individuals have lower total and
LDL-cholesterol levels than would be expected of males of
their age after treatment with estrogens and anti-androgens
for 3 years or longer. This more favorable lipid profile was
associated with reduced free testosterone and increased
estrogen levels, and it was unrelated to the distribution of
ER-Pvu/ER-Xba polymorphisms.
At this point, we would like to comment on some
limitations of our study. One is that ethynyl estradiol, used
by most of the participants, cannot be measured with a
standard estradiol assay. Also, the small number of subjects
and the heterogeneity of the estrogen preparations used
make it difficult to establish a definitive relationship be-
tween genotype of the estrogen receptor and lipid profiles.
Numerous naturally occurring polymorphisms of human
ER-1 are associated with several clinical phenotypes, includ-
ing risk of breast cancer [20], risk of abortion [21], bone
mineral density [22], anti-fracture efficacy of hormone
replacement therapy [23], body mass index [24], hyperten-
sion [25], coronary atherosclerosis [26], serum lipids [26],
and even augmented response of HDL to estrogen replace-
ment therapy [5].
Matsubara et al. [26] did not find any relationship
between ER polymorphisms and serum lipids in men. Our
data in male-to-female, estrogen-treated TS showed an
interaction between Apo B levels and ER polymorphisms.
The different forms, dosages, and consistency of estro-
gens used may have affected the results of this study. This is
an unavoidable limitation that we were aware of as soon as
we began to collect the data because every TS took estrogens
and anti-androgens in their own way. We conclude that
chronic administration of estrogens in men may produce a
better lipid profile by reducing both total cholesterol and its
subfraction of LDL-cholesterol. This study shows that plas-
ma lipids in adult men are probably sensitive to estrogens.
Although the obvious untoward effects of estrogens in males
preclude their use for hyperlipidemia, these findings corrob-
orate the notion that activation of the ER results in favorable
effects on serum lipids in males. They also suggest a
potential role for ER polymorphisms in the modulation of
this response, thus strengthening the rationale for developing
selective estrogen receptor modulators for use in men.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by a grant from the College of
Physicians of Las Palmas and from Gerican SL, together
with the University Foundation of Las Palmas de Gran
Canaria.
References
[1] Sullivan JM, Vander Zwaag R, Lemp GF, Hughes JP, Maddock V,
Kroetz FW, et al. Postmenopausal estrogen use and coronary athero-
sclerosis. Ann Intern Med 1988;108:358–63.
[2] Shlipak MG, et al., Heart and Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study
Investigators. Lipid changes on hormone therapy and coronary heart
disease events in the heart and estrogen/progestin replacement study
(HERS). Am Heart J 2003;146:870–5.
[3] Writing Group for the Women’s Health Initiative Investigators. Risks
and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal
women. JAMA 2002;288:321–3.
[4] Manson JE, Hsia J, Johnson KC, Rossouw JE, Assaf AR, Lasser NL,
Page 7
M. Sosa et al. / European Journal of Internal Medicine 15 (2004) 231–237 237
et al. Estrogen plus progestin and the risk of coronary heart disease.
N Engl J Med 2003;349:523–34.
[5] Herrington DM, Howard TD, Hawwkins GA, Reboussin DM, Xu J,
Zheng SL, et al. Estrogen receptor polymorphisms and effects of
estrogen replacement on high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in wom-
en with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 2002;346:967–74.
[6] Vatalas IA, Dionyssious-Asteriou A. Adrenal C19 steroids and serum
lipoprotein levels in healthy men. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 2001;
11:388–93.
[7] Morrison JA, Sprecher DL, Biro FM, Apperson-Hausen C, Dipaola
LM. Serum testosterone associates with lower high-density lipopro-
tein cholesterol in black and whites males, 10 to 15 years of age,
through lowered apolipoprotein AI and AII concentrations. Metabo-
lism 2002;51:432–7.
[8] Berg G, Schreier L, Geloso G, Otero P, Nagelberg A, Levalle O.
Impact on lipoprotein profile after long-term testosterone replacement
in hypogonadal men. Horm Metab Res 2002;34:87–92.
[9] Grupo de trabajo sobre protocolos y practica clınica SEIOMM. Datos
basicos en osteoporosis. Rev Esp Enferm Metab Oseas 2000;9:84–5.
[10] Burstein M, Samaille J. Sur un dosage rapide du cholesterol lie aux
a-et aux h-lipoproteines du serum. Clin Chim Acta 1960;5:609.
[11] Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredickson DS. Estimation of the concen-
tration of low density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma without use of
the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem 1972;18:499–502.
[12] Martin KA, Douglas PS. In: Rose BD, editor. Risks and side effects
associated with oral contraceptives; 2003. Up to date, Wellesley, MA.
[13] Lobo RA, Skinner JB, Lippman JS, Cirillo SJ. Plasma lipids and
desogestrel and ethynyl estradiol: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 1996;
65:1100–9.
[14] Binder EF, Williams DB, Schechtman KB, Jeffe DB, Kohrt WM.
Effects of hormone replacement therapy on serum lipids in elderly
women. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Intern Med
2001;134:754–60.
[15] Laton B, Rose S, McLeod D, Dowell A. Changes in the use of
hormonal replacement therapy after the report from Women’s Health
Initiative: a cross sectional survey of users. BMJ 2003;327:845–6.
[16] Sudhir K, Chou TM, Chatterjee K, Smith EP, Williams TC, Kane JP,
et al. Premature coronary artery disease associated with a disruptive
mutation in the estrogen receptor gene in a man. Circulation 1997;
96:3774–7.
[17] Hodgin JB, Krege JH, Reddick RL, Korach KS, Smithies O, Maeda
N. Estrogen receptor alpha is a major mediator of 17beta-estradiol’s
atheroprotective effects on lesion size in Apoe� /� ?? mice. J Clin
Invest 2001;107:333–40.
[18] Novoa FJ, Boronat M, Carrillo A, Tapia M, Diaz-Cremades J, Chir-
ino R. Effects of tamoxifen on lipid profile and coagulation param-
eters in male patients with pubertal gynecomastia. Horm Res 2002;
57:187–91.
[19] Inukai T, Takanashi K, Takebayashi K, Tayama K, Aso Y, Takiguchi
Y, et al. Estrogen markedly increases LDL-receptor activity in hyper-
cholesterolemic patients. J Med 2000;31:247–61.
[20] Andersen TI, Heimdal KR, Skerede M, Tveit K, Berg K, Borresen
AL. Oestrogen receptor (ESR) polymorphisms and breast cancer sus-
ceptibility. Hum Genet 1994;94:665–70.
[21] Lehrer S, Sanchez M, Song HK, Dalton J, Levine E, Savoretti P, et al.
Oestrogen receptor B-region polymorphisms and spontaneous abor-
tion in women with breast cancer. Lancet 1990;335:622–4.
[22] Kobayashi S, Inoue S, Hosoi T, Ouchi Y, Shiraki M, Orimo H. As-
sociation of bone mineral density with polymorphisms of the estrogen
receptor gene. J Bone Miner Res 1996;11:306–11.
[23] Salmen T, Heikkinen AM, Mahonen A, Kroger H, Komulainen M,
Saarikoski S, et al. The protective effect of hormone replacement
therapy on fracture risk is modulated by estrogen receptor alpha ge-
notype in early postmenopausal women. J Bone Miner Res 2000;15:
2479–86.
[24] Deng HW, Li J, Li JL, Dowd R, Davies KM, Johnson M, et al.
Association of estrogen receptor-alpha genotypes with body mass
index in normal healthy postmenopausal Caucasian women. J Clin
Endocrinol Metab 2000;85:2748–51.
[25] Lehrer S, Rabin J, Kalir T, Schachter BS. Estrogen receptor variant
and hypertension. Hypertension 1993;21:439–41.
[26] Matsubara Y, Murata M, Kawano K, Zama T, Aoki N, Yoshino M,
et al. Genotype distribution of estrogen receptor polymorphisms in
men and postmenopausal women from healthy and coronary popula-
tions and its relation to serum lipid levels. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc
Biol 1997;17:3006–12.