September 2007 © 2007 University of Denver 1 UNIVERSITY OF DENVER UNIVERSITY OF DENVER Contract Review Process Contract Review Process Policy and Procedures Policy and Procedures
September 2007 © 2007 University of Denver 1
UNIVERSITY OF DENVERUNIVERSITY OF DENVER
Contract Review ProcessContract Review ProcessPolicy and ProceduresPolicy and Procedures
September 2007 © 2007 University of Denver 2
DISCLAIMERDISCLAIMER The University of Denver Office of University Counsel The University of Denver Office of University Counsel
has prepared this training module for general has prepared this training module for general information and use by University of Denver employees information and use by University of Denver employees only. The pages are not intended to provide legal only. The pages are not intended to provide legal advice for any particular situation. Legal advice can be advice for any particular situation. Legal advice can be provided only in the course of an attorney-client provided only in the course of an attorney-client relationship with reference to all the facts of a specific relationship with reference to all the facts of a specific situation. Accordingly, this information must not be situation. Accordingly, this information must not be relied on as a substitute for obtaining legal advice from relied on as a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a licensed attorney.a licensed attorney.
September 2007 © 2007 University of Denver 3
Contract Review Process: Contract Review Process: BackgroundBackground
Board Approved Policy 2.10.030 regarding Board Approved Policy 2.10.030 regarding Limits of Authority was aLimits of Authority was adopted by the dopted by the Board of Trustees on October 18, 1993.Board of Trustees on October 18, 1993.
Last amended with respect to designating Last amended with respect to designating specific individuals with signing authority specific individuals with signing authority on April 14, 2007.on April 14, 2007.
See hSee http://www.du.edu/bfa/policy/index.htmlttp://www.du.edu/bfa/policy/index.html
September 2007 © 2007 University of Denver 4
Contract Review Process: Contract Review Process: BackgroundBackground
Policy 2.10.030 requires the review Policy 2.10.030 requires the review of “contracts” that have of “contracts” that have
(1) performance by University of (1) performance by University of obligations over a period of one year obligations over a period of one year or more; or or more; or
(2) University commitments in an (2) University commitments in an amount of $20,000 or more; oramount of $20,000 or more; or
(3) possible indemnification or (3) possible indemnification or reimbursement by the University or reimbursement by the University or the creation of a University l iabil i ty the creation of a University l iabil i ty (including from a lawsuit) in an (including from a lawsuit) in an amount of $20,000 or more.amount of $20,000 or more.
September 2007 © 2007 University of Denver 5
Contract Review Process: Contract Review Process: BackgroundBackground
Policy 2.10.030 defines Policy 2.10.030 defines “CONTRACTS” as any contract or “CONTRACTS” as any contract or agreement, whether written or agreement, whether written or oral, which is intended to create a oral, which is intended to create a University obligation. University obligation.
September 2007 © 2007 University of Denver 6
Contract Review Process : Contract Review Process : BackgroundBackground
It is not the name or It is not the name or description given to a description given to a document or the specif ied document or the specif ied amount that dictates the amount that dictates the University’s requirement for University’s requirement for contract review. It is the contract review. It is the intention of the document, i .e. intention of the document, i .e. to create an obligation for the to create an obligation for the University that meets the University that meets the threshold established by the threshold established by the Board of Trustees.Board of Trustees.
September 2007 © 2007 University of Denver 7
Contract Review Process : Contract Review Process : BackgroundBackground
In general, obligations that should be In general, obligations that should be submitted for contract review include, but submitted for contract review include, but are not l imited to:are not l imited to: Goods and servicesGoods and services Real estateReal estate EmploymentEmployment Professional and consultant servicesProfessional and consultant services Affiliations (i.e. memoranda of understandings)Affiliations (i.e. memoranda of understandings) Amendments of existing contractsAmendments of existing contracts Assumption of risk and releasesAssumption of risk and releases Registration forms for eventsRegistration forms for events
September 2007 © 2007 University of Denver 8
Contract Review Process: Contract Review Process: BackgroundBackground
Contracts may only be Contracts may only be signed by individuals signed by individuals with authority from the with authority from the Board of Trustees. Board of Trustees.
September 2007 © 2007 University of Denver 9
Contract Review Process: Contract Review Process: Limits of Limits of AuthorityAuthority
Chancellor (unlimited)Chancellor (unlimited) Vice Chancellor for Business and Financial Affairs Vice Chancellor for Business and Financial Affairs
(unlimited)(unlimited) Provost (up to $250,000) Provost (up to $250,000) Controller (up $250,000, up $1.5 million related to Controller (up $250,000, up $1.5 million related to
sponsored programs)sponsored programs) Assistant Vice Chancellor for Business and Financial Assistant Vice Chancellor for Business and Financial
Affairs ( up to $50,000)Affairs ( up to $50,000) Director of Sponsored Programs (up to $500,000 Director of Sponsored Programs (up to $500,000
related to Sponsored Programs)related to Sponsored Programs) Vice Chancellor for Communications (up to $50,000 Vice Chancellor for Communications (up to $50,000
for media and publications)for media and publications) Vice Chancellor for University Technology Services Vice Chancellor for University Technology Services
(up to $50,000 for computer related activities)(up to $50,000 for computer related activities)
September 2007 © 2007 University of Denver 10
Contract Review Process: Limits of Contract Review Process: Limits of AuthorityAuthority
University Counsel (up to $50,000 for engagement University Counsel (up to $50,000 for engagement letters for legal or litigation services)letters for legal or litigation services)
Director of Athletics (up $100,000 for contracts for Director of Athletics (up $100,000 for contracts for athletic participation)athletic participation)
Vice Chancellor of University Advancement (up Vice Chancellor of University Advancement (up $500,000 for IRS form 8283- Non-cash Charitable $500,000 for IRS form 8283- Non-cash Charitable Contribution Form)Contribution Form)
Director of University Events (up to $250,000 for Director of University Events (up to $250,000 for matters involving University events)matters involving University events)
Executive Director, Newman Center for Performing Executive Director, Newman Center for Performing Arts (up to $100,000 relating to the Newman Center)Arts (up to $100,000 relating to the Newman Center)
Associate Vice Chancellor of University Advancement Associate Vice Chancellor of University Advancement (up $500,000 for IRS form 8283- Non-cash Charitable (up $500,000 for IRS form 8283- Non-cash Charitable Contribution Form)Contribution Form)
September 2007 © 2007 University of Denver 11
Contract Review Process: Contract Review Process: Limits of Limits of AuthorityAuthority
Deans and Vice Chancellors and one Deans and Vice Chancellors and one other departmental designee (other than other departmental designee (other than the Budget Officer) up to $50,000.the Budget Officer) up to $50,000.
The Vice Chancellor for Business and The Vice Chancellor for Business and Financial Affairs may designate others Financial Affairs may designate others in writing with the amounts determined in writing with the amounts determined annually.annually.
Requests for additional Authority must Requests for additional Authority must be made through the Office of University be made through the Office of University Counsel.Counsel.
September 2007 © 2007 University of Denver 12
CONTRACT REVIEW PROCESSCONTRACT REVIEW PROCESS
Policy 2.10.030 requires Policy 2.10.030 requires that all “CONTRACTS” be that all “CONTRACTS” be submitted to the Controller submitted to the Controller and University Counsel for and University Counsel for review and approval review and approval BEFOREBEFORE execution. execution.
September 2007 © 2007 University of Denver 13
CONTRACT REVIEW PROCESSCONTRACT REVIEW PROCESS
Policy 2.10.030 requires the Controller, or Policy 2.10.030 requires the Controller, or Controller’s Designee (Budget Officers) to Controller’s Designee (Budget Officers) to review each contract to confirm that review each contract to confirm that (1) funds are available for any payment (1) funds are available for any payment obligations; and obligations; and (2) insurance or similar coverage is (2) insurance or similar coverage is available for insurable risks, in cooperation available for insurable risks, in cooperation with Risk Management.with Risk Management.
September 2007 © 2007 University of Denver 14
CONTRACT REVIEW PROCESSCONTRACT REVIEW PROCESS UNIVERSITY INSURANCE POLICIES AND UNIVERSITY INSURANCE POLICIES AND
PROCEDURESPROCEDURES University requires a 3rd Party to have at a
minimum general liability coverage of $1 Million per occurrence and $2 Million aggregate and to name the University as an “additional insured.”
Contracts with more inherent risks may require additional insurance coverage, i.e. workers’ compensation, automobile liability, liquor liability.
September 2007 © 2007 University of Denver 15
CONTRACTCONTRACT REVIEW REVIEW PROCESSPROCESS
UNIVERSITY INSURANCE POLICIES AND UNIVERSITY INSURANCE POLICIES AND PROCEDURESPROCEDURES Tenant User Liability Insurance (TULIP), Tenant User Liability Insurance (TULIP),
is available for 3is available for 3rdrd parties who do not parties who do not have insurance that are using University have insurance that are using University facilities. TULIP is event specific and facilities. TULIP is event specific and does not provide continuous coverage does not provide continuous coverage for the 3for the 3rdrd party. TULIP provides a $1 party. TULIP provides a $1 Million layer of protection to the Million layer of protection to the University for General Liability coverage. University for General Liability coverage.
September 2007 © 2007 University of Denver 16
CONTRACTCONTRACT REVIEW REVIEW PROCESSPROCESS
UNIVERSITY INSURANCE POLICIES AND UNIVERSITY INSURANCE POLICIES AND PROCEDURESPROCEDURES The University’s insurance The University’s insurance
requirements should always be requirements should always be part of the initial negotiation of a part of the initial negotiation of a contract. contract.
For additional information go to For additional information go to www.du.eduwww.du.edu/risk/risk
September 2007 © 2007 University of Denver 17
CONTRACTCONTRACT REVIEW REVIEW PROCESSPROCESS
UNIVERSITY INSURANCE POLICIES AND UNIVERSITY INSURANCE POLICIES AND PROCEDURESPROCEDURES Modification and/or waiver of the
requirement of insurance may be approved by the appropriate Dean or Vice Chancellor if after discussion with Risk Management and University Counsel it is shown that the activity or project serves the best interest of the University and the risk to the University is otherwise mitigated.
September 2007 © 2007 University of Denver 18
CONTRACT REVIEW PROCESSCONTRACT REVIEW PROCESS
Policy 2.10.030 requires University Policy 2.10.030 requires University Counsel, or University Counsel’s Counsel, or University Counsel’s Designee (Assistant University Counsel or Designee (Assistant University Counsel or outside counsel), to review each contract outside counsel), to review each contract to confirm that to confirm that (1) the contract accomplishes the intended (1) the contract accomplishes the intended purposes; and purposes; and (2) does not present any burdensome or (2) does not present any burdensome or unintended liability risks.unintended liability risks.
September 2007 © 2007 University of Denver 19
CONTRACT REVIEW PROCESSCONTRACT REVIEW PROCESS
Policy 2.10.030 further requiresPolicy 2.10.030 further requires Controller and University Counsel Controller and University Counsel
to endeavor to conduct reviews on to endeavor to conduct reviews on a timely basis and that the a timely basis and that the University employee initiating the University employee initiating the contract, whenever possible, to contract, whenever possible, to provide a provide a reasonable period of timereasonable period of time for such review. for such review.
September 2007 © 2007 University of Denver 20
Contract Review ProcessContract Review Process University Counsel approval is only one University Counsel approval is only one
step in the University Contract Review step in the University Contract Review ProcessProcess
Other administrative review and approval may Other administrative review and approval may be required by University rules, policies, and be required by University rules, policies, and procedures, i.e. New Technology Application, procedures, i.e. New Technology Application, Capital Improvements, Sponsored Programs. Capital Improvements, Sponsored Programs.
It is the responsibility of the Originator to It is the responsibility of the Originator to ensure adherence to such rules, policies and ensure adherence to such rules, policies and procedures.procedures.
Not complying with other administrative or Not complying with other administrative or departmental reviews will delay review of the departmental reviews will delay review of the contract by University Counsel.contract by University Counsel.
www.du.edu/bfawww.du.edu/bfa
September 2007 © 2007 University of Denver 21
CONTRACT REVIEW PROCESSCONTRACT REVIEW PROCESS
Modified Contract Review Modified Contract Review Process Process
Exceptions to ProcessExceptions to ProcessOffice of Research and Office of Research and
Sponsored ProgramSponsored ProgramPurchasing (i.e. Purchase Purchasing (i.e. Purchase
Orders)Orders)
September 2007 © 2007 University of Denver 22
CONTRACT REVIEW PROCESSCONTRACT REVIEW PROCESS
PROCESS FLOW CHARTPROCESS FLOW CHART
September 2007 © 2007 University of Denver 23
* NOTE: If 3rd party does not provide contract, Originator works with Budget Officer and University Counsel to draft a DU-originated contract for review by the 3rd party.
Reviews contract terms. Completes contract routing form checklist and confirms receipt of entire contract.If an addendum, attach copy of original contract.
Obtains & completes paperwork (including contract routing form)
with assistance of Budget Officer
Obtains departmental
signatures
Origin
atorB
ud
get Officer
Risk
Mitigation
(form
al reviewers)
Obtains authorized DU & 3rd
party signatures
3 rd Party
Revises contract
Accepts contract
revisions?
Proposes contract
revisions?
Signs and returns to
Originator at DU
Sends signed contract to Budget
Officer (department or division keeps
original)
Office of University Counsel performs legal review
(includes review by other experts as needed)
Contract revisions?
Y
Retains copy for
files
N
Counsel approves
contract and
signs contract routing form
NY Y
Sends copy of contract to Purchasing for processing, if necessary, and final copy
to University Counsel
Assists originator with paperwork
(including contract routing
form), if necessary
Performs budgetary and
insurance review
Further review by Budget Officer & Originator
Approved?
Y
N
If required, (1) obtains competitive bids and/or (2) completes specific reviews mandated by the University’s Board of Trustees BEFORE a contract is initiated with a 3rd party (e.g., new technology application review, capital projects review, etc.)
Paperwork complete?
Y
Stakeholders and administrative reviewers
advise originator of feasibility of product,
service, program, event, etc.
EndN
Identifies 3rd Party & conducts initial
discussion of service (product) to provide
or to be provided (creates relationship)
N
Obtains authorized DU
signatures
Identifies need; discusses feasibility
with stakeholders and administrative
reviewers
Provides DU with contract *
End
September 2007 © 2007 University of Denver 24
CONTRACT REVIEW PROCESSCONTRACT REVIEW PROCESS University Counsel ProceduresUniversity Counsel Procedures
Originator submits contract to Office Originator submits contract to Office of University Counsel for reviewof University Counsel for review
Contract logged in and referred to Contract logged in and referred to attorney for review (University attorney for review (University Counsel, Assistant University Counsel, Assistant University Counsel or outside counsel)Counsel or outside counsel)
Confirmation of receipt of contract for Confirmation of receipt of contract for review sent to Originatorreview sent to Originator
September 2007 © 2007 University of Denver 25
CONTRACT REVIEW PROCESSCONTRACT REVIEW PROCESS University Counsel ProceduresUniversity Counsel Procedures
CONTRACT ROUTING FORM
..\Forms\DUContractRoutingForm04.01.2007_003.doc
September 2007 © 2007 University of Denver 26
CONTRACT REVIEW PROCESSCONTRACT REVIEW PROCESS University Counsel ProceduresUniversity Counsel Procedures
University Counsel reviews contractUniversity Counsel reviews contract If no changes required, contract If no changes required, contract
approved.approved. If changes required, University If changes required, University
Counsel prepares modification Counsel prepares modification memo or revises contract.memo or revises contract.
September 2007 © 2007 University of Denver 27
CONTRACT REVIEW PROCESSCONTRACT REVIEW PROCESS University Counsel ProceduresUniversity Counsel Procedures
University Counsel reviews University Counsel reviews contracts for form and legal contracts for form and legal sufficiency, for examplesufficiency, for example What is the contract term?What is the contract term? Are the deliverables clearly Are the deliverables clearly
outlined?outlined? When is payment due? When is payment due? What are the termination What are the termination
provisions?provisions?
September 2007 © 2007 University of Denver 28
CONTRACT REVIEW PROCESSCONTRACT REVIEW PROCESS University Counsel ProceduresUniversity Counsel Procedures
Other considerations:Other considerations: Does the person signing the contract Does the person signing the contract
have authority to sign it?have authority to sign it? Does it contain dispute resolution Does it contain dispute resolution
provision?provision? Does the contract require the University Does the contract require the University
to do something it cannot legally do or is to do something it cannot legally do or is against University policy? against University policy?
September 2007 © 2007 University of Denver 29
CONTRACT REVIEW PROCESSCONTRACT REVIEW PROCESS University Counsel ProceduresUniversity Counsel Procedures
University Counsel does not University Counsel does not determine the substance of a determine the substance of a contract, e.g.contract, e.g. The deliverables.The deliverables. The amount of fees to be paid.The amount of fees to be paid. When services will be performed When services will be performed
(the term).(the term).
September 2007 © 2007 University of Denver 30
CONTRACT REVIEW PROCESSCONTRACT REVIEW PROCESS University Counsel ProceduresUniversity Counsel Procedures
University Counsel review ensures that University Counsel review ensures that specific contract provisions protecting the specific contract provisions protecting the University are included in the contractUniversity are included in the contract
University Counsel may draft a contract University Counsel may draft a contract and, if needed, participate in the and, if needed, participate in the negotiation of contract termsnegotiation of contract terms
Modification Memo and/or contract Modification Memo and/or contract returned to Originator for changes and returned to Originator for changes and approval of changes by 3rd partyapproval of changes by 3rd party
September 2007 © 2007 University of Denver 31
CONTRACT REVIEW PROCESSCONTRACT REVIEW PROCESS University Counsel ProceduresUniversity Counsel Procedures
Originator is responsible for making or Originator is responsible for making or submitt ing to 3rd party changes to the submitt ing to 3rd party changes to the contract and the return to University contract and the return to University Counsel of the revised contract for Counsel of the revised contract for approvalapproval If all changes are not made, University Counsel If all changes are not made, University Counsel
returns contract to originator for additional changesreturns contract to originator for additional changes If all changes are made, contract and approved If all changes are made, contract and approved
contract routing form forwarded to Originator to obtain contract routing form forwarded to Originator to obtain authorized signatureauthorized signature
Once approved, contract may be sign by Once approved, contract may be sign by authorized signatoryauthorized signatory
September 2007 © 2007 University of Denver 32
CONTRACT REVIEW PROCESSCONTRACT REVIEW PROCESS
Form contracts that have been previously Form contracts that have been previously reviewed and approved by University reviewed and approved by University Counsel do not have to be submitted for Counsel do not have to be submitted for review before each execution unless review before each execution unless substantive changes have been made.substantive changes have been made.
Please confirm with University Counsel Please confirm with University Counsel regarding the use and execution of regarding the use and execution of approved form contracts.approved form contracts.
September 2007 © 2007 University of Denver 33
CONTRACT REVIEW PROCESSCONTRACT REVIEW PROCESS Consequences of fai lure to Consequences of fai lure to
fol low policy:fol low policy: Contract may be void or voidableContract may be void or voidable Employee may be subject to Employee may be subject to
disciplinary action and/or personal disciplinary action and/or personal l iabil i tyl iabil i ty
University subject to audit f indings (an University subject to audit f indings (an area of potential control weakness, area of potential control weakness, policy violation, f inancial policy violation, f inancial misstatement, or other issue identif ied misstatement, or other issue identif ied during the University’s audit and during the University’s audit and reported to the Board of Trustees.) reported to the Board of Trustees.)
September 2007 © 2007 University of Denver 34
CONTRACT REVIEW PROCESSCONTRACT REVIEW PROCESS For more informationFor more information
The Contract Review policies and The Contract Review policies and procedures are located at the Office procedures are located at the Office of University Counsel’s website at:of University Counsel’s website at:
http://www.du.edu/counselhttp://www.du.edu/counsel