September 13, 2007 SMEs and IP in Switzerland - Nikolaus Thumm 1 Nikolaus Thumm Senior Economic Counsellor Swiss Federal Institute of Intellectual Property WIPO Forum on Intellectual Property and Small and Medium- Sized Enterprises WIPO Geneva, September 13 and 14, 2007 SMEs and IP in Switzerland - A new approach-
27
Embed
September 13, 2007SMEs and IP in Switzerland - Nikolaus Thumm1 Nikolaus Thumm Senior Economic Counsellor Swiss Federal Institute of Intellectual Property.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
September 13, 2007 SMEs and IP in Switzerland - Nikolaus Thumm 1
Nikolaus Thumm
Senior Economic Counsellor
Swiss Federal Institute of Intellectual Property
WIPO Forum on Intellectual Property and Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises WIPOGeneva, September 13 and 14, 2007
SMEs and IP in Switzerland- A new approach-
SMEs and IP in Switzerland - Nikolaus ThummSeptember 13, 2007 2
Example:To patent or not to patent?
Inventions
InnovationsPatented inventions
Patented Innovations
Get them on the market?Get them patented or not?
Get them patented or not?
Costs of patenting!!
SMEs and IP in Switzerland - Nikolaus ThummSeptember 13, 2007 3
Relevance for SMEs?First Step back: Alternative Protection Measures
Secrecy Publication Lead time advantage Product complexity Embodiment intangibles Customer relations management ‚Open source‘ strategies
Intellectual Property Rights
SMEs and IP in Switzerland - Nikolaus ThummSeptember 13, 2007 4
Relevance for SMEs?Second Step back: What do SMEs know about IP?
Knowledge about, use of IP protection
No. of SMEs
?Innocent
non-users Professional users
Policy
SMEs and IP in Switzerland - Nikolaus ThummSeptember 13, 2007 5
General Hypothesis for SMEs:
SMEs have a huge innovation potential IP rights are not sufficiently used by SMEs SMEs often don‘t recognize the importance of IP
rights for their business SMEs are heterogeneous (‚+‘ Biotech, ‚-‘
Mechanical engineering) Information and training services are not
sufficient
SMEs and IP in Switzerland - Nikolaus ThummSeptember 13, 2007 6
More questions than answers:
What are the reasons for the SME IP paradox? Is there a un-used innovation potential? What is the role of IP with venture capital? Are there SME specific necessities as for IP, that
are not considered within the current system? Are the existing training and information services
sufficient? Can the Government help? How? …
SMEs and IP in Switzerland - Nikolaus ThummSeptember 13, 2007 7
What is the situation at present with SMEs and what should it look like ideally?
Present Future
Steering Group
?•are innovative
•rarely use the IP System
•are not informed
•need special training
•...
•…
•better, special training
•more information
•lower fees
•less taxes
•...
•…
SMEs and IP in Switzerland - Nikolaus ThummSeptember 13, 2007 8
Structure of the Swiss IP SME Project
Swiss IP Office
Steering Group
Swiss SME Survey
1 2Benchmarking
IP Services
3Ec. Focus
Study
4Case Studies
5Public IP
Perception
New/better SME IP Services
SMEs and IP in Switzerland - Nikolaus ThummSeptember 13, 2007 9
Objectives:
To improve the use and commercialization of intellectual property with SMEs
Increase awareness with SMEs in general Clarify misunderstandings Improve technological information services Development of customer oriented services
SMEs and IP in Switzerland - Nikolaus ThummSeptember 13, 2007 10
‘As to how far should design protection be improved?’
SMEs and IP in Switzerland - Nikolaus ThummSeptember 13, 2007 23
0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00% 50.00% 60.00%
others (n=236)
trade (n=56)
construction (n=59)
entertainment, print media (n=34)
nutrition (n=30)
professional services (n=33)
mechanical engineering (n=261)
information technology (n=85)
electronics (n=113)
medical devices, optics, watches (n=70)
pharma, biotech (n=26)
chemistry (n=48)
is all right
to improve
don't know
‘As to how far should access to information with patents be improved?’
SMEs and IP in Switzerland - Nikolaus ThummSeptember 13, 2007 24
Summary findings Swiss SMEs are creative and innovative
Nutrition industry, chemistry and biotechnology are leading.
The use a IP rights by Swiss SMEs is on average low ( but higher with medium sized companies)
Many Swiss SMEs don‘t use the IP system at all.
The nutrition industry uses trade marks very actively and is satisfied with its use
The patent system is criticized for being too complicated, not to enforce and high attorney fees
Users are satisfied: pharma, biotech, chemistry, nutrition
Non-users are unsatisfied: mechanical engineering, electronics, construction
Few positive influences of intellectual property rights are mentioned: With patents the protection of competitors is predominant; with trade marks the protection of competitors and promotional reasons are predominant (especially with the nutrition industry).
SMEs have a relatively little knowledge about IP Rights, the knowledge is high with the few users of the system
With patents, especially the access to information and the office fees are criticized. Little is known about training possibilities
Very little is known about design protection
Specific problems mentioned: access to information, fees (both office and attorney fees), little knowledge about training
SMEs and IP in Switzerland - Nikolaus ThummSeptember 13, 2007 25
SMEs are at the core of the innovation process IP is often crucial in this process Where and when: find it out! Empirical work is
often required Provide access to IP knowledge Requires plenty of training and capacity building
Lessons to learn so far
SMEs and IP in Switzerland - Nikolaus ThummSeptember 13, 2007 26
Next project steps:
Swiss SME Survey
1 2Benchmarking
IP Services
3Ec. Focus
Study
4Case Studies
5Public IP
Perception
New/better SME IP Services
SMEs and IP in Switzerland - Nikolaus ThummSeptember 13, 2007 27