Department of Transportation Seismic Design of South Park Bascule Seismic Design of South Park Bascule Bridge Bridge Yang Yang Jiang Jiang T-8 AASHTO Technical Committee 8 AASHTO Technical Committee for Moveable Bridges for Moveable Bridges for Moveable Bridges for Moveable Bridges Sacramento, CA Sacramento, CA May 24, 2010 May 24, 2010
26
Embed
Seismic Design of South Park Bascule Bridgesp.bridges.transportation.org/Documents/2010 SCOBS...Seismic Design of South Park Bascule Bridge Yang Yang Jiang Jiang TT--8 AASHTO Technical
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Department of Transportation
Seismic Design of South Park Bascule Seismic Design of South Park Bascule BridgeBridge
•• Located in Located in south south Seattle across Seattle across Duwamish Duwamish waterwaywaterway
•• Subsurface consists of silty sand Subsurface consists of silty sand to significant depth and medium to significant depth and medium stiff stiff clay underneathclay underneath
•• Numerous Numerous earthquakes of earthquakes of magnitudes magnitudes up to 6.8 up to 6.8 on the on the Richter Richter scalescaleSouth Park Bridge Richter Richter scalescaleSouth Park Bridge
•• OpenOpen--grate deckgrate deck
•• 9.59.5--foot foot lane widthlane width99
•• Constructed in Constructed in 19291929--19311931
•• DeterioratingDeteriorating
•• Solid deckSolid deck
•• 1111--foot lane widthfoot lane width
•• Architectural features of Architectural features of existing bridgeexisting bridge
•• StateState--ofof--thethe--artart
South Bascule Pier North Bascule Pier
Sil S dTimber Piles
Silty Sand
Tip Elev -145 0
Medium Clay
Primary Bascule Pier Movements• North Pier moves towards west• South Pier rotates• Both Piers moved 2” toward waterway Tip Elev. 145.0
Dense Clay
• Both Piers moved 2 toward waterway• Pattern changed after 2001 Nisqually EQ
Teeth as designed
Teeth after Nisqually Nisqually
Earthquake
•• AASHTO “LRFD Movable Highway Bridge Design AASHTO “LRFD Movable Highway Bridge Design Specifications ” 2nd Edition 2007 with 2008 InterimsSpecifications ” 2nd Edition 2007 with 2008 InterimsSpecifications, 2nd Edition, 2007 with 2008 Interims.Specifications, 2nd Edition, 2007 with 2008 Interims.
•• AASHTO “AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications,” AASHTO “AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications,” customary U.S. units, 4th Edition, 2007 with 2008 customary U.S. units, 4th Edition, 2007 with 2008 y , ,y , ,Interims.Interims.
•• WSDOT “Bridge Design Manual LRFD,” May 2008WSDOT “Bridge Design Manual LRFD,” May 2008..
•• AASHTO “Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic AASHTO “Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design,” 1Bridge Design,” 1stst Edition, 2009 for approach Edition, 2009 for approach structures.structures.
•• Seismic Performance Zone 4Seismic Performance Zone 4
•• Site Class “E”Site Class “E”
•• SiteSite--specific response specific response spectra for two levels of spectra for two levels of earthquakes were earthquakes were earthquakes were earthquakes were developed by Shannon & developed by Shannon & Wilson, Inc. Wilson, Inc.
R t R t •• Response spectrum Response spectrum analysisanalysis
•• SpectrumSpectrum--compatible time compatible time histories were developed histories were developed by Earth Mechanics, Incby Earth Mechanics, Inc..by Earth Mechanics, Incby Earth Mechanics, Inc..
•• Nonlinear time history Nonlinear time history analysisanalysis
•• Operational EarthquakeOperational Earthquake
the bridge should be able to open to traffic the bridge should be able to open to traffic -- the bridge should be able to open to traffic the bridge should be able to open to traffic immediately after immediately after a minor earthquakea minor earthquake
-- the bridge can only be closed to traffic for a the bridge can only be closed to traffic for a limited period time for repairs after a major limited period time for repairs after a major p p jp p jearthquakeearthquake
•• Operational EarthquakeOperational Earthquake
Some damage to expansion jointsSome damage to expansion joints Some damage to expansion jointsSome damage to expansion joints
No apparent permanent displacementsNo apparent permanent displacements
No damages to the machineryNo damages to the machinery
Limit displacement between trunnion and Limit displacement between trunnion and pinion to 0 5”pinion to 0 5”pinion to 0.5”pinion to 0.5”
•• Design EarthquakeDesign Earthquake
Damage to expansion jointsDamage to expansion joints
Push-over Curves for Shaft and Caisson Foundations
40,000
30,000
35,000
s)
20,000
25,000
al L
oad
(kip
s
5 000
10,000
15,000
Late
ra
0
5,000
0 1 2 3 4 5
Displacement (ft)
Caisson Shaft-Long Shaft-Trans
Collapsible Joint
Elevation – Longitudinal Frame
Gap
Elevation – Longitudinal Frame
•• Minimize displacement between trunnion and pinionMinimize displacement between trunnion and pinion
•• Provides Provides simple means to jack the girderssimple means to jack the girders•• Provides Provides simple means to jack the girderssimple means to jack the girders
•• Does not involve wall when adjusting trunnion Does not involve wall when adjusting trunnion framesframes
•• PrePre--assemble the frame in shopassemble the frame in shop
•• TrunnionTrunnion frames are elastic frames are elastic –– no damagesno damages
•• Damages are concentrated at the collapsible jointsDamages are concentrated at the collapsible joints
Stand-Alone Model
Global Model
2 5E 04
3.0E+04
3.5E+04
1 0E+03
2.0E+03
Base Contact Side Friction
0 0E+00
5.0E+03
1.0E+04
1.5E+04
2.0E+04
2.5E+04
Sprin
g (p
sf)
-1.0E+03
0.0E+00
1.0E+03
-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0
Sprin
g (p
sf)
0.0E+00-0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5
Downward Disp. (ft)
-2.0E+03Disp. (ft)
Base Friction Passive Pressure
5.0E+03
1.0E+04
psf)
2 0E+04
3.0E+04
4.0E+04
(psf
)
Base Friction Passive Pressure
-1.0E+04
-5.0E+03
0.0E+00-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0
Sprin
g (p
Disp. (ft)
0.0E+00
1.0E+04
2.0E+04
-0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0
Sprin
g
Disp. (ft)p ( ) p ( )
RS Global RS Stand‐alone NL Time History
•• Seismic Seismic articulation of bridge components is critical articulation of bridge components is critical in satisfying seismic performance in satisfying seismic performance requirementsrequirements
•• NonNon--linear analysis is invaluable for seismic design of linear analysis is invaluable for seismic design of bascule bridgesbascule bridges
•• Sunken caisson foundations provide superior seismic Sunken caisson foundations provide superior seismic performance performance
•• SoilSoil--foundationfoundation--structure structure interaction such as rocking interaction such as rocking reduces seismic demandsreduces seismic demands
•• Tim Tim Lane of King CountyLane of King County
•• Po Lam and Hubert Law of Earth Mechanics, Inc.Po Lam and Hubert Law of Earth Mechanics, Inc.
•• Hisham Sarieddine of Shannon & Wilson, Inc.Hisham Sarieddine of Shannon & Wilson, Inc.