Seismic Capacity Assessment of Sanyi Old Railway Tunnel Jin - Hung Hwang , Chih - Chieh Lu Department of Civil Engineering National Central University November 9, 2005
May 11, 2015
Seismic Capacity Assessment of Sanyi Old Railway Tunnel
Jin - Hung Hwang , Chih - Chieh LuDepartment of Civil Engineering
National Central UniversityNovember 9, 2005
DATE: 10th Nov, 2010CET Hall
www.cesnitsilchar.wordpress.com Fanpage MISSION 2015::NIT Silchar www.twitter.com/cesnitsilchar
Outline
IntroductionBasic Data of the TunnelsAssessment Methods Analysis procedure of MCSRDCase analysis – Sanyi Old Railway TunnelConclusion
IntroductionUnderground structures are traditionally
considered to be more earthquake-resistant.Extremely strong shaking might induce
damages of rock tunnel 1995 Kobe earthquake About 10 tunnels required countermeasures 1999 Taiwan Chi-Chi earthquake A total of fifty tunnels were reported to be
damagedAn important issue to tunnel engineers in
seismic active area
Basic Data of the tunnels
Topography DTM topography Max. overburden depth
Geology Gravel and soft rock formations Geotechnical parameters and wave velocities
Cross section and lining Cross section Lining thickness and materials
Current state of the tunnels Cracks Seeping of the ground water
Assessment Methods
The empirical method (Langefors and Kihlstrom, 1963) Damage criterion Allowable PGV for concrete and brick linings Threshold PGA and JMA scale in the gravel
and soft rock formation Correlation of PGV with JMA intensity scale Assessment results
The Modified Cross-Section Racking Deformation Method (MCSRD) Analysis procedure of MCSRD Case analysis-Sanyi old railway tunnels
Analysis procedure of MCSRD
Set up the grid meshApply geostatic stressesExcavate the tunnel and install the lining
supportApply a seismic shear strainCheck the lining strength curvesDecide the allowable seismic shear strainCalculate the allowable peak ground
velocity (PGV)
Step 1:Set up the grid mesh
Analysis procedure of MCSRD
Set up the grid meshApply geostatic stressesExcavate the tunnel and install the lining
supportApply a seismic shear strainCheck the lining strength curvesDecide the allowable seismic shear strainCalculate the allowable peak ground
velocity (PGV)
Step 2:Apply geostatic stresses
v
vh K 0 vh K 0
v
Analysis procedure of MCSRD
Set up the grid meshApply geostatic stressesExcavate the tunnel and install the lining
supportApply a seismic shear strainCheck the lining strength curvesDecide the allowable seismic shear strainCalculate the allowable peak ground
velocity (PGV)
Step 3:Excavate the tunnel and install
the lining supportv
vh K 0 vh K 0
v
Analysis procedure of MCSRD
Set up the grid meshApply geostatic stressesExcavate the tunnel and install the lining
supportApply a seismic shear strainCheck the lining strength curvesDecide the allowable seismic shear strainCalculate the allowable peak ground
velocity (PGV)
Step 4:Apply a seismic shear strain
Analysis procedure of MCSRD
Set up the grid meshApply geostatic stressesExcavate the tunnel and install the lining
supportApply a seismic shear strainCheck the lining strength curvesDecide the allowable seismic shear strainCalculate the allowable peak ground
velocity (PGV)
Step 5: Check the lining strength curves
Mu
Pu
Vu
Pu
Analysis procedure of MCSRD
Set up the grid meshApply geostatic stressesExcavate the tunnel and install the lining
supportApply a seismic shear strainCheck the lining strength curvesDecide the allowable seismic shear strainCalculate the allowable peak ground
velocity (PGV)
Step 6: Decide the allowable seismic shear strain
The allowable seismic shear strain is the shear strain that just causes the lining internal forces reach the limit state.
Mu
Pu
Vu
Pu
awhere
Analysis procedure of MCSRD
Set up the grid meshApply geostatic stressesExcavate the tunnel and install the lining
supportApply a seismic shear strainCheck the lining strength curvesDecide the allowable seismic shear strainCalculate the allowable peak ground
velocity (PGV)
Step 7: Calculate the allowable peak ground velocity (PGV)
......(1)....................asa V
is the allowable peak ground velocity
where, is the allowable seismic shear straina
av
sV is the wave velocity of the ground
Case AnalysisSanyi old railway tunnels
Input dataThe enlarged deformation behavior of
tunnelThe distribution of bending moment, shear
force and axial force on the tunnelCheck the lining strength curvesThe allowable peak ground velocity (PGV)Seismic capacity of the tunnels
Input data
The parameters of the ground formation
Ground formation
Unit weight (KN/m3)
E (GPa)
c (MPa)
φo Poison ratio
Vs (km/sec)
Vp (km/sec)
soft rock 24 1.96 0.2 32 0.3 0.6 ~ 1.5 2 ~ 3
The cross section and strength properties of the linings
lining thickness (m) 0.3 0.45 0.6 0.8 1
cross section (m2) 0.3 0.45 0.6 0.8 1
moment inertial (m4) 0.00225 0.00759 0.018 0.0427 0.0833
lining strength (kg/cm2) 140 、 210 、 280 、 350
The enlarged deformation behavior of tunnel
original
deformed
Shear direction
0.0001剪應變 0.002剪應變 0.01剪應變
The distribution of bending moment, shear force, and axial force on the tunnel
0.0001剪應變 0.002剪應變 0.01剪應變Shear forceBending moment Axial force0.0001剪應變 0.002剪應變 0.01剪應變
Check the lining strength curves
shear strain= 0.005
Mu (tf-m)
shearstrain= 0.001
-500
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Mu (tf-m)
Pu(tf
)
shear strai n=0
-500
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
0 50 100 150 200 250 300Mu (tf-m)
Pu
(tf)
-500
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Pu
(tf)
shear strain =0.005
0
50
100
150
200
0 50 100 150 200
Vu (tf)Pu
(tf)
Shear strain=0.002
0
50
100
150
200
0 50 100 150 200
Vu (tf)
Pu(t
f)
shear strain=0
0
50
100
150
200
0 50 100 150 200
Vu (tf)
Pu(t
f)
The allowable peak ground velocity (PGV)
Bending failure mode Shearing failure mode
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
10 15 20 25 30 ground velocity(cm/s)
Lin
ing
thic
knes
s(m
)
fc'=140
fc'=210
fc'=280
fc'=350
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
30 35 40 45 50 ground velocity(cm/s)
linin
gth
ickn
ess(
m)
fc'=140
fc'=210
fc'=280
fc'=350
Seismic capacity of the tunnelsgravel formation
Seismic capacity of the tunnelssoft rock formation
bending failure mode shearing failing mode
JMA scale
Lining strength(kg/cm2) JMA scale
Lining strength(kg/cm2)
140 210 280 350 140 210 280 350
Lin
ing thickness (m
)
0.3 V V V V Lin
ing thickness (m
)
0.3 V V V V
0.45 V V V V 0.45 V V V VI
0.6 V V V V 0.6 V V Ⅵ VI
0.8 V V V V 0.8 V VI VI VI
1.0 V V V V 1.0 VI VI VI VI
Summary of the assessed seismic capacity
JMA IV in gravel at leastJMA V in soft rock at leastOne scale larger than that assessed by
the empirical method
Comparison with Field Performances in the Past Earthquakes
1935 Hsinchu-Taichung Earthquake Historic iso-seismal map ML=7.1,JMA=VI,PGA≥400 gal Damage condition
1999 Chi-Chi Earthquake ML=7.3, iso-seismal map Estimated PGV, PGA and JMA scale JMA=IV~V No damage
Comparison Assessed JMA=IV~V at least JMA=VI in 1935 earthquake → serious damage JMA= IV~V in 1999 earthquake →no damage Agree field performance well
Conclusion
A modified cross-section racking deformation (MCSRD) method is proposed to assess the seismic capacities of the tunnel structures. It is easy ,fast, and able to automatically consider nonlinear SSI effect and to consider complex rock formation and irregular tunnel shape.
The assessed seismic capacities of Sanyi old railway tunnels agree well with their field performances in the past earthquakes
Thanks for your attention