-
SEDIMENT SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS REPORT
MAINTENANCE DREDGING PROJECT SCHNEIDER DOCK AND INTERMODAL
FACILITY
990 WEST WATERFRONT DRIVE EUREKA, CALIFORNIA 95501
PREPARED BY:
PACIFIC AFFILIATES, INC. A CONSULTING ENGINEERING GROUP
990 WEST WATERFRONT DRIVE EUREKA, CA 95501
(707) 445-3001
JANUARY 20, 2014
-
Schneider Dock January 2014 Sediment Testing Results Job No.
11-1438
Pacific Affiliates, Inc. i
TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION 1
A. SCOPE OF WORK 1 B. OBJECTIVES
1 C. SITE LOCATION 1 D. BACKGROUND
2
II. SAMPLING ACTIVITIES 3 A. SAMPLE COLLECTION
3 B. SAMPLE HANDLING 3
III. LABORATORY ANALYSIS 4 A. TESTING
LABORATORIES 4 B. SAMPLE COMPOSITING 4
IV. QUALITY CONTROL 5
V. DISCUSSION 6 A. GEOLOGY 6 B.
HISTORICAL DATA 6 C. ANALYTIC RESULTS 6
VI. CONCLUSIONS 13
VII. REFERENCES 14
APPENDIX I – SEDIMENT CORE SAMPLE LOGS I
APPENDIX II – SEDIMENT CORE SAMPLE LOCATIONS II
APPENDIX III – SEDIMENT SAMPLE ANALYTICAL RESULTS III
-
Schneider Dock January 2014 Sediment Testing Results Job No.
11-1438
Pacific Affiliates, Inc. ii
LIST OF TABLES Table 1 - Physical characteristics of sediment
................................................................................
7 Table 2 - Metals
..............................................................................................................................
7 Table 3 - PAH’s
..............................................................................................................................
8 Table 4 - Chlorinated Hydrocarbons
..............................................................................................
8 Table 5 - Phthalates
.........................................................................................................................
9 Table 6 - Phenols
............................................................................................................................
9 Table 7 - Miscellaneous Extractables
.............................................................................................
9 Table 8 - Organochlorine Pesticides
.............................................................................................
10 Table 9 - Polychlorinated Biphenyls
............................................................................................
10 Table 10 - Tributyltin
....................................................................................................................
10 Table 11 - Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
...................................................................................
11 Table 12 - Dioxins
........................................................................................................................
11 Table 13 - Furans
..........................................................................................................................
11 Table 14 – TEQ Calculation
.........................................................................................................
12
-
Schneider Dock January 2014 Sediment Testing Results Job No.
11-1438
Pacific Affiliates, Inc. iii
ABBREVIATIONS California Coastal Commission CCC California
Environmental Quality Act CEQA Environmental Protection Agency EPA
Eureka Forest Products EFP Humboldt Bay Harbor, Recreation and
Conservation District HBHRCD Laboratory Control Sample LCS
Laboratory Control Sample Duplicates LCSD Matrix Spike MS Matrix
Spike Duplicate MSD Mean Lower Low Water MLLW Pacific Affiliates PA
Quality Control QC Regional Water Quality Control Board RWQCB
Relative Percent Difference RPD Sampling and Analysis Plan SAP
Sediment Evaluation Framework SEF Sierra Pacific Industries SPI
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers USACE
-
Schneider Dock January 2014 Sediment Testing Results Job No.
11-1438
Pacific Affiliates, Inc. 1
I. INTRODUCTION This Report of Findings presents the results of
sampling and analysis of the sediment proposed to be dredged at the
Schneider Dock and Intermodal Facility (SDI). A discussion of
sampling activities and the sediment testing results is contained
herein as well. Sediment sampling was performed at SDI’s dock
August 23, 2013 by Pacific Affiliates (PA). All investigative
activities were performed in general accordance with the Sediment
Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP) dated May 6, 2013 prepared by PA.
The SAP was reviewed and approved by the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the Humboldt
Bay Harbor, Recreation and Conservation District (HBHRCD) among
other agencies.
A. Scope of Work Sediment sampling and analysis is part of a
broader scope of work with the ultimate objective of obtaining
permit coverage for maintenance dredging at the Schneider Dock. The
scope of work includes the following activities:
Prepare SAP and obtain plan approval from all involved agencies
Implement SAP Prepare Sediment Sampling and Analysis Report based
upon results of sampling
activities Prepare CEQA document for maintenance dredging
project Obtain dredging permits
B. Objectives The intent of sediment sampling and analysis is to
characterize the sediment proposed to be dredged. Historical data
from sediment testing previous completed has shown Humboldt Bay to
have elevated concentrations of several chemicals. In order to
properly handle and dispose of the dredged material, it must be
characterized by thorough analysis.
C. Site Location Schneider Dock is located on the eastern shore
of the North Bay Channel in Humboldt Bay, approximately ¼ of a mile
west of Highway 101 at 990 West Waterfront Drive in Eureka, CA.
Project parcels are described as APN’s 003-062-026, 003-062-024 and
003-062-021; the former being a tideland parcel owned by the City
of Eureka and the latter two being the adjacent upland parcels
owned by SDI. The subject properties are located along the southern
boundary of Section 21, Township 5 North, Range 1 West. The
proposed project will cause disturbance to waters of the United
States within Humboldt Bay in the Eureka Plain Hydrologic Unit No.
110.
-
Schneider Dock January 2014 Sediment Testing Results Job No.
11-1438
Pacific Affiliates, Inc. 2
D. Background Schneider Dock, formerly the City of Eureka Dock
A, has been used extensively for the import and export of cargo via
Humboldt Bay throughout its history. In 1991, Mr. David Schneider
purchased the upland parcel from Louisiana Pacific and assumed the
lease of the tidelands, for which the dock is on, from the City of
Eureka. SDI is used regularly by domestic and international vessels
up to 700 feet in length with draft depths up to 35 feet. Cargo is
stored on the upland parcels adjacent to the dock (APN’s
003-062-024, 003-062-028 and 003-062-021). SDI is seeking
maintenance dredging permits from the USACE, California Regional
Water Quality Control Board and HBHRCD. A permit exemption for
dredging is being applied for through the California Coastal
Commission (CCC). New legislation will go into effect on January 1,
2014 that does not require a lease through the State Lands
Commission to dredge. An existing Coastal Development Permit
(CDP-10-0003) is in the process of being amended to allow the
temporary storage of various types of cargo, including dredged
material, on Parcel 003-062-021. Schneider Dock was last dredged in
1974 to a depth of -37 feet Mean Lower Low Water (MLLW). The
proposed maintenance dredging project is required to maintain
adequate berthing depth for vessels that moor at the dock, as well
as to insure the continued safe and convenient operation of the
facility. It is proposed to remove a maximum of 2,000 cubic yards
of sediment during the initial dredging event in an effort to reach
the design dredge depth of -37 feet MLLW (plus two foot allowable
overdredge to -39 ft MLLW). Dredging extents are described as
follows: from the western edge of the dock to the eastern boundary
of the Humboldt Bay channel (approximately 70 feet west from the
north and south ends of the dock), and extending 100 feet northerly
from the north end and 100 feet southerly from the south end of the
dock (550 feet total length parallel with face of dock), for a
total footprint of approximately 0.9 acres. Within this area,
approximately 0.5 acres is proposed to be dredged to design depth,
the remainder of the area is currently at or below -37 ft MLLW. All
edges of the dredge area will be box cut which will allow the
adjacent material to slough off to its natural angle of repose.
Material that sloughs off into the dredge area will be removed
during cleanup dredging (this is consistent with the methods used
by the USACE during their dredging of the main channels in Humboldt
Bay). Dredging procedures will consist of a crane with a clamshell
bucket or a long reach excavator positioned either on a barge or on
the dock. If a barge is used, dredge material will be pulled from
the floor of the Bay and deposited into a containment area on the
barge. Once the containment area is filled with sediment, it will
be transferred to ten yard dump trucks positioned on the dock. If a
barge is not used, dredged material will be placed directly into
the dump trucks. The trucks will transport the sediment to a
temporary retention basin in the graveled area of parcel
003-062-021. The temporary retention basin will consist of an area
measuring approximately 96 feet by 116 feet that will be 80%
enclosed with a 4 foot high earth berm. The remainder of the basin
will be enclosed by a 1 foot high berm which will allow equipment
access, but will contain any free
-
Schneider Dock January 2014 Sediment Testing Results Job No.
11-1438
Pacific Affiliates, Inc. 3
water. Dump trucks will unload the dredged material within the
bermed area where it will remain for a minimum of two days to dry
out. Once adequately dried, the material will be piled within the
retention basin for storage until it is hauled offsite. The
proposed site for the retention basin slopes gently away from the
bay, thus any incidental surface run-off will not flow into the
bay.
II. SAMPLING ACTIVITIES
A. Sample Collection Sediment sampling was performed by Pacific
Affiliates staff from the company work barge on August 23, 2013.
The barge was anchored at the sampling locations specified in the
SAP. Samples were collected approximately 75 feet beyond the north
and south ends of the dock and at the one-quarter and
three-quarters points along the length of the dock. Actual sample
locations are shown on the bathymetric map in Appendix II. Core
samples were collected using a VibeCore-D coring device which
utilizes three-inch diameter sample tubes. Prior to sampling, the
sample tubes were decontaminated by washing the interior with a
borax solution followed by a rinse with clean water, then a double
rinse with distilled water. After securing a sample tube to the
VibeCore, the assembly was lowered to the mudline, powered on and
vibrated into the sediment. Using pre-measured markings on the
rope, the distance the sample tube had advanced into the sediment
was monitored. Once adequate depth was achieved, the sampler was
hoisted out of the water and placed on the barge deck. Full depth
samples were achieved at all locations. Based on conditions
observed in the field, Sample A-1 achieved a depth of 8.5 feet
below the mudline; A-2 reached 6.5 feet; A-3 reached seven feet;
and A-4 reached 13 feet below the mudline. B. Sample Handling A
plunger supplied with the sample tubes was used to push the sample
out of the tube onto a sheet of plastic to be documented and
cataloged. A fresh sample tube was used at each sample location.
Logs of the core samples are provided in Appendix I. After
separating the Z-layer portion of the sample (sediment from -39 ft
to -39.5 ft MLLW) and discarding any sediment from below -39.5 ft
MLLW, the sample was split along its longitudinal axis and
homogenized. After homogenizing the samples, they were split into a
primary subsample and a backup subsample. Each subsample consisted
of two eight ounce jars and one four ounce jar, all of which were
supplied by Enviromatrix, the laboratory performing the sediment
analysis. Samples were labeled with the date, time, location,
sample ID, client and the sampler. Primary subsamples were packed
in a cooler with ice and shipped overnight to the laboratory along
with proper chain-of-custody. Z-layer sediment was homogenized and
placed in sample jars consistent with the primary and backup
samples. Backup and Z-layer samples are stored in a refrigerator
pending approval of the primary sample analysis.
-
Schneider Dock January 2014 Sediment Testing Results Job No.
11-1438
Pacific Affiliates, Inc. 4
III. LABORATORY ANALYSIS
A. Testing Laboratories Enviromatrix Analytical Inc. was
contracted to perform the sediment analyses. Enviromatrix is an
accredited environmental laboratory (ELAP No. 2564) in San Diego,
CA. Enviromatrix subcontracted the following tests to laboratories
listed below:
Grain size analysis - PTS Laboratories, Inc. Total Organic
Carbon – Calscience Environmental Laboratories, Inc. Furans and
Dioxins – Ceres Analytical Laboratories, Inc.
Appendix III contains a list of all chemicals tested for and the
test methods utilized. All testing methods are in accordance with
those approved by the EPA and are based on Table 6-1 of the
Sediment Evaluation Framework (SEF). A discussion of deviations
from the approved methods was held between Enviromatrix and EPA and
approved with the condition that the lab describes their methods
and detection limits in the results report, including any clean-up
necessary to achieve the SEF limits as closely as possible. B.
Sample Compositing Sediment samples from the four sample locations
were shipped overnight to Enviromatrix. Per the SAP, laboratory
personnel combined the four samples into a single 4:1 composite
sample for analysis. Complete sediment testing results with
laboratory quality control data and chain-of-custody documentation
are contained in Appendix III.
-
Schneider Dock January 2014 Sediment Testing Results Job No.
11-1438
Pacific Affiliates, Inc. 5
IV. QUALITY CONTROL Pacific Affiliates received the analytic
results for the sediment samples from Enviromatrix on September 12,
2013 and the grain size analysis on September 20, 2013.
Enviromatrix, or the subcontracted laboratory, provided notes on
all anomalies that occurred during testing which are summarized
below. With the exception of the matrix spikes for Zinc, Nickel,
Antimony and Total Sulfide and the duplicate for Di-n-butyl
phthalate, all quality control (QC) results were within the limits.
Due to noted non-homogeneity of the QC sample matrix, the Matrix
Spike (MS) did not provide reliable results for accuracy and
precision for Zinc and Nickel. The acceptable percent recovery
range for the MS was 75-125% and the recovery for Zinc was 127%,
and 133% for Nickel. Sample results for the QC batch were accepted
based on Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) and Laboratory Control
Sample Duplicates (LCSD) percent recoveries and Relative Percent
Difference (RPD) values. The spike recoveries for Antimony and
Total Sulfide were outside acceptance limits (75-125%) for the MS
and Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD) due to matrix interference.
Recoveries for Total Sulfide were 126% for the MS and 130% for MSD.
The LCS and LCSD were within acceptance limits showing that the
laboratory is in control and the data is acceptable. The RPD result
for Di-n-butyl phthalate was 117, which exceeded the QC limit of 30
due to non-homogeneity of the sample. Dilution of the Gasoline
(C6-C10) sample was necessary due to nature of the matrix. All
samples were handled with the appropriate chain-of-custody
procedures and samples were analyzed within the required holding
times. All laboratory QC batches were checked to ensure that the
correct number of samples were analyzed, the holding times were not
exceeded, surrogates recoveries were within stated control limits,
and that Laboratory Method Blank, MS, MSD, LCS and LCSD were all
tested and within the acceptable limits except as noted above and
in the laboratory analytical reports.
-
Schneider Dock January 2014 Sediment Testing Results Job No.
11-1438
Pacific Affiliates, Inc. 6
V. DISCUSSION
A. Geology Sediment within the dredge prism was explored in four
locations. The depth to the mudline, below zero feet MLLW, varied
from approximately 27 feet on the north end of the dock to 33.5
feet in front of the southern half of the dock. Depths achieved
during sampling ranged from approximately 6.5 feet to 13 feet below
the mudline. Sampled depths below zero feet MLLW ranged from -39.5
feet to -40 feet. Sediments were found to be, on average, in the
fine sand range with the gradation being 48% fine sands, 24% silt,
20% medium sand and 8% clay. All the sediments were dark gray in
color. Logs of the core samples can be found in Appendix I.
B. Historical Data Extensive sediment sampling and analysis has
been performed around Humboldt Bay as part of previous dredging
projects. Analytic results from this project were compared to data
from sediment testing performed at the Sierra Pacific Dock in 2006,
which is located ±800 feet south of Schneider Dock, as well as from
11 City of Eureka waterfront mooring facilities and Woodley Island
Marina, all of which were sampled in 2005. Though not all
parameters tested for during this project were analyzed in the
previous projects, several were. When comparing the recent test
results to historical data, the concentrations detected at SDI in
2013 were within the ranges detected around the Bay and at the
Sierra Pacific Dock in 2006.
C. Analytic Results The sediment sampling procedures used for
this project were intended to provide data from a representative
sample of the sediment to be dredged. Chemical concentrations were
not delineated vertically or horizontally, as the individual core
samples were composited into one single sample for analysis.
Sediment quality guidelines for evaluating chemical analytical
results consist of chemical screening levels (SLs), which are
defined in the Sediment Evaluation Framework for the Pacific
Northwest (SEF), Table 6-3. The SLs are designed to be protective
of direct biological effects to benthic and aquatic organisms and
correspond to a “no adverse effects level.” The following sections
present the analytical results for the chemicals identified in
Table 3 of the Sampling Plan. Shown in the following tables are the
analytes and the respective detected concentration, Detection Limit
(DL), Reporting Limit (RL) and, for certain chemicals, the SL
and/or a note about the test result.
-
Schneider Dock January 2014 Sediment Testing Results Job No.
11-1438
Pacific Affiliates, Inc. 7
Conventionals As part of the characterization of the sediment,
the following “conventional” tests were run to gain an
understanding of the makeup of the sediment. The percentage of
solids in the sample and a grain size analysis of the solids were
used to determine the physical characteristics of the sediment.
Both summarized in the following table. Table 1 - Physical
characteristics of sediment ANALYSIS RESULT
UNITSTotal Solids, as received 64.0
%Coarse sand 0 %Medium sand 19.91
%Fine sand 48.39 %Silt 24.16 %Clay 7.53
%Median Grain Size 0.177 mm
Also tested for were Total Organic Carbon (10,000 mg/kg), Total
Sulfides (5.2 mg/kg) and Ammonia as N (4.4 mg/kg). Metals
Detectable concentrations of Arsenic, Chromium, Copper, Mercury,
Lead, Mercury, Nickel, and Zinc were found in the sediment sample.
Compared with historical data from around Humboldt Bay, these are
average concentrations. All detected concentrations were found to
be below the Screening Levels (SLs) established in SEF Table 6-3.
Table 2 - Metals ANALYTE RESULT DL RL SL UNITS
NOTEAntimony ND 2.11 3.52 150 mg/kg ‐‐Arsenic
4.14 0.704 1.76 57 mg/kg ‐‐Cadmium ND 0.352 0.352 5.1
mg/kg ‐‐Chromium 50.2 1.41 3.52 260 mg/kg
‐‐Copper 16.2 1.41 1.76 390 mg/kg ‐‐Lead 6.92
1.76 1.76 450 mg/kg ‐‐Mercury 0.06 0.03 0.07 0.41
mg/kg JNickel 63.7 0.704 3.52 ‐‐ mg/kg
‐‐Silver ND 0.35 0.35 6.1 mg/kg ‐‐Zinc 40.7 7.74
35.2 410 mg/kg ‐‐
Notes: J Detected but below the Reporting Limit; therefore,
result is an estimated
concentration.
-
Schneider Dock January 2014 Sediment Testing Results Job No.
11-1438
Pacific Affiliates, Inc. 8
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons A number of PAH’s were detected
in the sediment sample. The reported concentrations were well below
the SLs and, in some cases, were below the RLs. Previous testing at
the SPI dock indicated lower levels of PAH’s, however, the limit
used in testing was 300 ug/L, which is much higher than the current
limits. Table 3 - PAH’s ANALYTE RESULT DL RL SL UNITS
NOTE Anthracene 4.99 3.93 27.9 960 ug/kg
J Acenaphthene ND 7.14 27.9 500 ug/kg
‐‐ Acenaphthylene ND 7.48 27.9 560 ug/kg
‐‐ Benzo (a) anthracene 14.5 4.31 27.9
1300 ug/kg J Benzo (b) fluoranthene 15.5
4.31 27.9 3200 ug/kg J Benzo (k) fluoranthene
7.19 5.13 27.9 3200 ug/kg
J Benzo (g,h,i) perylene ND 6.45 55.7
670 ug/kg ‐‐ Benzo (a) pyrene 8.03 4.28
27.9 1600 ug/kg J Chrysene 18.2 4.00 27.9 1400
ug/kg J Dibenz (a,h) anthracene ND 6.97 55.7
230 ug/kg ‐‐ Fluoranthene 32.7 4.78 27.9 1700
ug/kg ‐‐ Fluorene 9.69 6.27 27.9 540 ug/kg
J Indeno (1,2,3‐cd) pyrene ND 6.03 41.8
600 ug/kg ‐‐ 2‐Methylnaphthalene 18.6 10.6 27.9
670 ug/kg J Naphthalene 37.8 10.1 27.9 2100 ug/kg
‐‐ Phenanthrene 25.9 2.72 27.9 1500 ug/kg
J Pyrene 46.0 4.01 27.9 2600 ug/kg ‐‐
Chlorinated Hydrocarbons There were no chlorinated hydrocarbons
detected in the sediment sample above the reporting limits. Table 4
- Chlorinated Hydrocarbons ANALYTE RESULT DL RL
UNITS1,2‐Dichlorobenzene ND 12.6 27.9
ug/kg1,4‐Dichlorobenzene ND 11.9 27.9
ug/kg1,2,4‐Trichlorobenzene ND 11.9 27.9
ug/kgHexachlorobenzene ND 4.32 27.9 ug/kg
-
Schneider Dock January 2014 Sediment Testing Results Job No.
11-1438
Pacific Affiliates, Inc. 9
Phthalates Three Phthalates, Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate, and
Di-n-butyl and Diethyl phthalate, were detected at low
concentrations. These concentrations are two orders of magnitude
below the SLs established in the SEF. The remainder of the
phthalates tested for were not detected at the reporting limit.
Table 5 - Phthalates ANALYTE RESULT DL RL SL UNITS
NOTEBis(2‐ethylhexyl)phthalate 16.2 7.97 62.7 1,300
ug/kg J Butyl benzyl phthalate ND 5.73
55.7 63 ug/kg ‐‐ Di‐n‐butyl phthalate 44.9
5.39 55.7 1,400 ug/kg J Diethyl phthalate
3.61 2.24 27.9 200 ug/kg J Dimethyl phthalate
ND 4.68 27.9 71 ug/kg ‐‐ Di‐n‐octyl phthalate
ND 6.43 55.7 6200 ug/kg ‐‐
Phenols Two of the five phenols tested for were detected above
the RL; however, the concentrations are well below the SLs. Table 6
- Phenols ANALYTE RESULT DL RL SL UNITS Phenol 124
12.3 41.8 420 ug/kg 2‐Methylphenol ND 9.14 27.9 63
ug/kg 4‐Methylphenol (3‐Methylphenol) 58.8
8.70 55.7 670 ug/kg
2,4‐Dimethylphenol ND 3.34 111 29
ug/kg Pentachlorophenol ND 8.39 55.7 400 ug/kg
Miscellaneous Extractables Of the miscellaneous extractables
tested for, only dibenzofuran was detected. The SL for dibenzofuran
is 540 μg/kg, which is well above the detected concentration of
21.9 μg/kg. Table 7 - Miscellaneous Extractables ANALYTE
RESULT DL RL SL UNITS NOTEBenzyl alcohol ND 2.01
105 57 ug/kg ‐‐Dibenzofuran 8.63 7.55 27.9 540
ug/kg JHexachlorobutadiene ND 9.88 27.9 11 ug/kg
‐‐Hexachloroethane ND 12.4 27.9 ‐‐ ug/kg
‐‐N‐Nitrosodiphenylamine ND 11.2 48.8 28 ug/kg ‐‐
-
Schneider Dock January 2014 Sediment Testing Results Job No.
11-1438
Pacific Affiliates, Inc. 10
Pesticides There were no pesticides detected in the sediment
sample above the detection limits. Table 8 - Organochlorine
Pesticides ANALYTE RESULT DL RL UNITS2,4´‐DDD ND 1.69
2.79 ug/kg4,4´‐DDD ND 0.68 2.79 ug/kg2,4´‐DDE ND 1.53
2.79 ug/kg4,4´‐DDE ND 0.66 2.79 ug/kg2,4´‐DDT ND 1.39
2.79 ug/kg4,4´‐DDT ND 0.45 2.79 ug/kgAldrin ND 0.71
2.79 ug/kgChlordane (Total) ND 6.55 6.97
ug/kgDieldrin ND 0.66 2.79 ug/kgHeptachlor ND 0.99 2.79
ug/kggamma‐BHC (Lindane) ND 0.49 2.79 ug/kg
Polychlorinated Biphenyls There were no PCBs detected in the
sediment sample above the detection limits. Table 9 -
Polychlorinated Biphenyls ANALYTE RESULT DL RL
UNITSAroclor 1016 ND 6.52 13.9
ug/kgAroclor 1221 ND 6.52 13.9
ug/kgAroclor 1232 ND 6.52 13.9
ug/kgAroclor 1242 ND 6.52 13.9
ug/kgAroclor 1248 ND 6.52 13.9
ug/kgAroclor 1254 ND 6.52 13.9
ug/kgAroclor 1260 ND 6.52 13.9 ug/kg
Tributyltin Tributyltin (TBT) was not detected in the sediment
sample above the detection limit. Table 10 - Tributyltin
ANALYTE RESULT DL RL UNITSTributyltin ND 1.38 1.39
ug/kg
-
Schneider Dock January 2014 Sediment Testing Results Job No.
11-1438
Pacific Affiliates, Inc. 11
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons The Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
tested for in the sediment sample were not detected above the
detection limits. Table 11 - Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
ANALYTE RESULT DL RL UNITS
NOTE Gasoline (C6‐C10) ND 0.334 0.557 mg/kg
R‐06 Diesel (C10‐C28) ND 4.00 10.0
mg/kg dry
‐‐ Extended Range HC (C28‐C40) ND 4.00
10.0 mg/kg dry ‐‐
Notes: R-06 Sample dilution was necessary due to nature of the
matrix.
Dioxins/Furans A number of dioxins and furans were detected in
the sediment sample, however, the majority of the positive results
were detected below the DL and were flagged as being an estimated
concentration. OCDD were not flagged as being below the DL,
however, they were detected below the SQLs, as were the other
detected dioxins and furans. The concentration of
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD was detected at 0.0216 μg/kg, which is above
the SQL of 0.005 μg/kg. OCDD was flagged as being present in the
method blank as well. Table 12 - Dioxins ANALYTE RESULT DL
SQL UNITS NOTE 2,3,7,8‐TCDD ND 0. 292 5 pg/g
‐‐ 1,2,3,7,8‐PeCDD 0. 456 ‐‐ 5 pg/g
J 1,2,3,4,7,8‐HxCDD ND 0.000424 5 pg/g
‐‐ 1,2,3,6,7,8‐HxCDD 2.68 ‐‐ 5 pg/g
J 1,2,3, 7,8,9‐HxCDD 1.33 ‐‐ 5 pg/g
J 1,2,3,4,6,7,8‐HpCDD 21.6 ‐‐ 5 pg/g ‐‐ OCDD
149 ‐‐ 50,000 pg/g B
Table 13 - Furans ANALYTE RESULT DL SQL UNITS
NOTE 2,3,7,8‐TCDF 0. 616 ‐‐ 1,000 pg/g
J 1,2,3,7,8‐PeCDF ND 0. 224 1,000 pg/g
‐‐ 2,3,4,7,8‐PeCDF ND 0. 228 1,000 pg/g
‐‐ 1,2,3,4,7,8‐HxCDF 0. 451 ‐‐ 1,000 pg/g
J 1,2,3,6,7,8‐HxCDF 0. 282 ‐‐ 1,000 pg/g
J 2,3,4,6,7,8‐HxCDF 0. 335 ‐‐ 1,000 pg/g
J 1,2,3,7,8,9‐HxCDF ND 0. 22 1,000 pg/g
‐‐ 1,2,3,4,6,7,8‐HpCDF 3.68 ‐‐ 1,000 pg/g
J 1,2,3,4,7,8,9‐HpCDF ND 0. 327 1,000 pg/g
‐‐ OCDF 9.22 ‐‐ 100,000 pg/g J
Notes: B Analyte present in the associated Method Blank J
Concentration found below the lower quantitation limit but greater
than zero.
-
Schneider Dock January 2014 Sediment Testing Results Job No.
11-1438
Pacific Affiliates, Inc. 12
Using the Toxicity Equivalence Factors (TEF) published by the
EPA (EPA 2010), the Toxicity Equivalence (TEQ) of the dioxins and
furans were calculated as shown in Table 14 below. For the purpose
of the evaluation, two TEQ values were calculated for those
compounds which returned non-detect results. The first TEQ value
assumes the test result was equal to zero; the second TEQ value
assumes the test result was equal to one-half of the detection
limit. Overall TEQs for the sediment ranged from 1.33 to 1.54 pg/g,
depending on the assumed non-detect concentration. These values are
relatively low and when compared to the TEQ results from the 11
City of Eureka waterfront sites tested in 2005, the values from
Schneider Dock would be on the lower end of the ranges calculated,
which were from 1.78 to 7.70 pg/g. Table 14 – TEQ Calculation
ANALYTE RESULT1
(pg/g) RESULT2
(pg/g) TEF3 TEQ
1
(pg/g) TEQ2
(pg/g) 2,3,7,8‐TCDD 0 0.146 1.0000 0
0.1461,2,3,7,8‐PeCDD 0.456 0.456 1.0000 0.456
0.4561,2,3,6,7,8‐HxCDD 0 0.212 0.1000 0
0.02121,2,3,4,7,8‐HxCDD 2.68 2.68 0.1000 0.268
0.2681,2,3,7,8,9‐HxCDD 1.33 1.33 0.1000 0.133
0.1331,2,3,4,6,7,8‐HpCDD 21.6 21.6 0.0100 0.216
0.216OCDD 149 149 0.0003 0.0447
0.04472,3,7,8‐TCDF 0.616 0.616 0.1000 0.0616
0.06161,2,3,7,8‐PeCDF 0 0.112 0.0300 0
0.003362,3,4,7,8‐PeCDF 0 0.114 0.3000 0
0.03421,2,3,6,7,8‐HxCDF 0.451 0.451 0.1000 0.0451
0.04511,2,3,7,8,9‐HxCDF 0.282 0.282 0.1000 0.0282
0.02821,2,3,4,7,8‐HxCDF 0.335 0.335 0.1000 0.0335
0.03352,3,4,6,7,8‐HxCDF 0 0.11 0.1000 0
0.0111,2,3,4,6,7,8‐HpCDF 3.68 3.68 0.0100 0.0368
0.03681,2,3,4,7,8,9‐HpCDF 0 0.1635 0.0100 0
0.001635OCDF 9.22 9.22 0.0003 0.002766
0.002766
Overall TEQs (pg/g) 1.325666
1.5430611 Using ND = 0 2 Using ND = 1/2 DL 3 All TEFs are from EPA 2010
-
Schneider Dock January 2014 Sediment Testing Results Job No.
11-1438
Pacific Affiliates, Inc. 13
VI. CONCLUSIONS Though a number of chemicals were detected in
the sediment sample, the concentrations of the detected chemicals
were similar to background levels within Humboldt Bay. Provided the
dredging is completed as approved by the governing agencies (work
windows, equipment, dredging procedures, etc.), the project should
not cause or contribute to degradation of groundwater or water
quality in Humboldt Bay. Dredged sediment shall be handled
appropriately and disposed of at an upland facility approved to
accept the material as characterized.
-
Schneider Dock January 2014 Sediment Testing Results Job No.
11-1438
Pacific Affiliates, Inc. 14
VII. REFERENCES Evaluation of Dredged Material Proposed for
Discharge in Waters of the U.S. - Testing Manual, Inland Testing
Manual, US EPA/ US Army Corps of Engineers. EPA 823-B-98-004,
February 1998. Guidelines for Implementing the Inland Testing
Manual in the San Francisco Bay Region. US EPA/SFBCDC, USACE -
SF/SF Bay Regional Board/CA State Lands Commission, September 21,
2001. Methods for Collection, Storage and Manipulation of Sediments
for Chemical and Toxicological Analyses: Technical Manual, US EPA,
EPA-823-B-01-002, October 2001. QA/QC Guidance for Sampling and
Analysis of Sediments, Water, and Tissues for Dredged Material
Evaluations, Chemical Evaluations, US EPA/USACE, EPA 823-B-95-001,
April 1995.
Recommended Toxicity Equivalence Factors (TEFs) for Human Health
Risk Assessments of 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin and
Dioxin-Like Compounds, US EPA, EPA/100/R-10/005, December 2010.
Sampling Results report for Dioxin/Furans, PCP and PCB Testing,
City of Eureka and Humboldt Bay, Harbor, Recreation and
Conservation District, Cooperative Eureka Waterfront Facilities
Maintenance Dredging Project, Eureka Channel, Humboldt Bay,
California, Pacific Affiliates, December 2005. Sediment Evaluation
Framework for the Pacific Northwest, US EPA, USACE, US Fish &
Wildlife Service, National Marine Fisheries Service, Idaho
Department of Environmental Quality, Oregon Department of
Environmental, Washington Department of Natural Resources,
Washington Department of Ecology, May 2009. Sediment Sampling
Analysis, City of Eureka and Humboldt Bay, Harbor, Recreation and
Conservation District, Pacific Affiliates, April 1, 2005. Sediment
Sampling and Analysis Plan, Schneider Dock – Maintenance Dredging,
Pacific Affiliates, May 6, 2013.
-
Schneider Dock January 2014 Sediment Testing Results Job No.
11-1438
Pacific Affiliates, Inc. I
APPENDIX I – SEDIMENT CORE SAMPLE LOGS
-
SEDIMENT CORE SAMPLESSCHNEIDER DOCK AND INTERMODAL FACILITY
990 W. WATERFRONT DRIVEEUREKA, CA 95501
-
SEDIMENT CORE SAMPLESSCHNEIDER DOCK AND INTERMODAL FACILITY
990 W. WATERFRONT DRIVEEUREKA, CA 95501
-
SEDIMENT CORE SAMPLESSCHNEIDER DOCK AND INTERMODAL FACILITY
990 W. WATERFRONT DRIVEEUREKA, CA 95501
-
SEDIMENT CORE SAMPLESSCHNEIDER DOCK AND INTERMODAL FACILITY
990 W. WATERFRONT DRIVEEUREKA, CA 95501
-
SEDIMENT CORE SAMPLESSCHNEIDER DOCK AND INTERMODAL FACILITY
990 W. WATERFRONT DRIVEEUREKA, CA 95501
-
Schneider Dock January 2014 Sediment Testing Results Job No.
11-1438
Pacific Affiliates, Inc. II
APPENDIX II – SEDIMENT CORE SAMPLE LOCATIONS
-
Schneider Dock January 2014 Sediment Testing Results Job No.
11-1438
Pacific Affiliates, Inc. III
APPENDIX III – SEDIMENT SAMPLE ANALYTICAL RESULTS
-
EnviroMatrix Analytical, Inc.
Pacific Affiliates
Sediment Testing 2013
Eureka, CA 95501990 W. Waterfront Drive
Corey Matson
Enclosed are the results of analyses for samples received by the
laboratory on 08/27/13 08:00. Samples were analyzed pursuant to
client request utilizing EPA or other ELAP approved methodologies.
I certify that this data is in compliance both technically and for
completeness.
12 September 2013
Attn:EMA Log #: 13H0768
Laboratory DirectorDan Verdon
CA ELAP Certification #: 2564
Project Name:
4340 Viewridge Avenue, Suite A - San Diego, California 92123 -
(858) 560-7717 - Fax (858) 560-7763Analytical Chemistry
Laboratory
-
Project Name:Pacific AffiliatesClient Name: EMA Log #:
13H0768Sediment Testing 2013
Sample ID Laboratory ID Matrix Date Sampled
ANALYTICAL REPORT FOR SAMPLES
Date Received
Schneider Dock Composite 13H0768-05 08/23/13 14:25 08/27/13
08:00Sediment
NOTE: The 2,3,7,8-TCDD analyses, TOC and Grain Size analyses
were performed by a sub-contract laboratory, results to follow in a
separate report.
The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in
accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical
report must be reproduced in its entirety.
Page 2 of 31
EnviroMatrix Analytical, Inc.
-
Project Name:Pacific AffiliatesClient Name: EMA Log #:
13H0768Sediment Testing 2013
Total Metals by EPA 6000/7000 Series Methods
Analyte Result MDL LimitReporting
Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes
Schneider Dock Composite (13H0768-05) Sediment Sampled: 08/23/13
14:25 Received: 08/27/13 08:00EPA 602008/28/13 08/29/13 mg/kg dry
30828255Silver ND 0.350.35
" " "" "4.14 0.704 1.76Arsenic """ "" ""Cadmium ND
0.3520.352
" " "" "50.2 1.41 3.52Chromium "" " "" "16.2 1.41 1.76Copper
"
3090428 09/04/13 09/04/13 " 1 J0.06 0.03 0.07Mercury EPA
74713082825 08/28/13 08/29/13 " 563.7 0.704 3.52Nickel EPA 6020
" " "" "6.92 1.76 1.76Lead """ "" ""Antimony ND 3.522.11
" " "" "40.7 7.74 35.2Zinc "
The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in
accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical
report must be reproduced in its entirety.
Page 3 of 31
EnviroMatrix Analytical, Inc.
-
Project Name:Pacific AffiliatesClient Name: EMA Log #:
13H0768Sediment Testing 2013
Organochlorine Pesticides by EPA Method 8081B
Analyte Result MDL LimitReporting
Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes
Schneider Dock Composite (13H0768-05) Sediment Sampled: 08/23/13
14:25 Received: 08/27/13 08:00EPA 808108/28/13 09/11/13 ug/kg dry
30828541Aldrin ND 2.790.71
"" "" ""alpha-BHC ND 2.790.38"" "" ""beta-BHC ND 2.790.60"" ""
""gamma-BHC (Lindane) ND 2.790.49"" "" ""delta-BHC ND 2.790.57"" ""
""alpha-Chlordane ND 6.970.66"" "" ""gamma-Chlordane ND 6.970.71""
"" ""Chlordane (Total) ND 6.976.55"" "" ""2,4´-DDD ND 2.791.69"" ""
""4,4´-DDD ND 2.790.68"" "" ""2,4´-DDE ND 2.791.53"" "" ""4,4´-DDE
ND 2.790.66"" "" ""2,4´-DDT ND 2.791.39"" "" ""4,4´-DDT ND
2.790.45"" "" ""Dieldrin ND 2.790.66"" "" ""Endosulfan I ND
2.790.59"" "" ""Endosulfan II ND 2.791.06"" "" ""Endosulfan sulfate
ND 2.790.67"" "" ""Endrin ND 2.790.68"" "" ""Endrin aldehyde ND
2.790.42"" "" ""Endrin ketone ND 2.791.11"" "" ""Heptachlor ND
2.790.99"" "" ""Heptachlor epoxide ND 2.790.98"" "" ""Methoxychlor
ND 2.791.03"" "" ""Toxaphene ND 27.912.3
" " " "69 % 26-146Surrogate: TCMX
The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in
accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical
report must be reproduced in its entirety.
Page 4 of 31
EnviroMatrix Analytical, Inc.
-
Project Name:Pacific AffiliatesClient Name: EMA Log #:
13H0768Sediment Testing 2013
Polychlorinated Biphenyls by EPA Method 8082
Analyte Result MDL LimitReporting
Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes
Schneider Dock Composite (13H0768-05) Sediment Sampled: 08/23/13
14:25 Received: 08/27/13 08:00EPA 808208/28/13 09/11/13 ug/kg dry
30828541Aroclor 1016 ND 13.96.52
"" "" ""Aroclor 1221 ND 13.96.52"" "" ""Aroclor 1232 ND
13.96.52"" "" ""Aroclor 1242 ND 13.96.52"" "" ""Aroclor 1248 ND
13.96.52"" "" ""Aroclor 1254 ND 13.96.52"" "" ""Aroclor 1260 ND
13.96.52
" " " "69 % 26-146Surrogate: TCMX
The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in
accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical
report must be reproduced in its entirety.
Page 5 of 31
EnviroMatrix Analytical, Inc.
-
Project Name:Pacific AffiliatesClient Name: EMA Log #:
13H0768Sediment Testing 2013
Semivolatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8270C
Analyte Result MDL LimitReporting
Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes
Schneider Dock Composite (13H0768-05) Sediment Sampled: 08/23/13
14:25 Received: 08/27/13 08:00EPA 8270C09/04/13 09/09/13 ug/kg dry
30904461Acenaphthene ND 27.97.14
"" "" ""Acenaphthylene ND 27.97.48" " "" " J4.99 3.93
27.9Anthracene "
"" "" ""Benzidine ND 209209" " "" " J14.5 4.31 27.9Benzo (a)
anthracene "" " "" " J15.5 4.31 27.9Benzo (b) fluoranthene "" " ""
" J7.19 5.13 27.9Benzo (k) fluoranthene "
"" "" ""Benzo (g,h,i) perylene ND 55.76.45" " "" " J8.03 4.28
27.9Benzo (a) pyrene "
"" "" ""Benzyl alcohol ND 1052.01"" ""
""Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane ND 27.910.1"" ""
""Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether ND 34.811.1"" ""
""Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether ND 34.812.3
" " "" " J16.2 7.97 62.7Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate """ ""
""4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ND 27.95.17"" "" ""Butyl benzyl
phthalate ND 55.75.73"" "" ""Carbazole ND 83.66.89"" ""
""4-Chloroaniline ND 1396.16"" "" ""4-Chloro-3-methylphenol ND
27.911.6"" "" ""2-Chloronaphthalene ND 27.98.52"" ""
""2-Chlorophenol ND 27.99.03"" "" ""4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ND
27.96.83
" " "" " J18.2 4.00 27.9Chrysene """ "" ""Dibenz (a,h)
anthracene ND 55.76.97
" " "" " J8.63 7.55 27.9Dibenzofuran "" " "" " J44.9 5.39
55.7Di-n-butyl phthalate "
"" "" ""1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 27.912.6"" ""
""1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND 27.911.9"" "" ""1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND
27.911.9"" "" ""3,3´-Dichlorobenzidine ND 2097.33"" ""
""2,4-Dichlorophenol ND 27.97.41
" " "" " J3.61 2.24 27.9Diethyl phthalate """ ""
""2,4-Dimethylphenol ND 1113.34"" "" ""Dimethyl phthalate ND
27.94.68"" "" ""4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol ND 69.77.67"" ""
""2,4-Dinitrophenol ND 13915.2"" "" ""2,4-Dinitrotoluene ND
27.95.69"" "" ""2,6-Dinitrotoluene ND 27.98.39"" "" ""Di-n-octyl
phthalate ND 55.76.43
" " "" "32.7 4.78 27.9Fluoranthene "
The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in
accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical
report must be reproduced in its entirety.
Page 6 of 31
EnviroMatrix Analytical, Inc.
-
Project Name:Pacific AffiliatesClient Name: EMA Log #:
13H0768Sediment Testing 2013
Semivolatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8270C
Analyte Result MDL LimitReporting
Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes
Schneider Dock Composite (13H0768-05) Sediment Sampled: 08/23/13
14:25 Received: 08/27/13 08:003090446 09/04/13 09/09/13 ug/kg dry 1
J9.69 6.27 27.9Fluorene EPA 8270C
"" "" ""Hexachlorobenzene ND 27.94.32"" "" ""Hexachlorobutadiene
ND 27.99.88"" "" ""Hexachlorocyclopentadiene ND 69.79.73"" ""
""Hexachloroethane ND 27.912.4"" "" ""Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene ND
41.86.03"" "" ""Isophorone ND 27.910.5
" " "" " J18.6 10.6 27.92-Methylnaphthalene """ ""
""2-Methylphenol ND 27.99.14
" " "" "58.8 8.70 55.74-Methylphenol (3-Methylphenol) "" " ""
"37.8 10.1 27.9Naphthalene "
"" "" ""2-Nitroaniline ND 69.75.45"" "" ""3-Nitroaniline ND
1399.11"" "" ""4-Nitroaniline ND 97.67.65"" "" ""Nitrobenzene ND
27.911.2"" "" ""2-Nitrophenol ND 27.910.5"" "" ""4-Nitrophenol ND
97.63.97"" "" ""N-Nitrosodimethylamine ND 27.911.2"" ""
""N-Nitrosodiphenylamine ND 48.811.2"" ""
""N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine ND 41.811.0"" "" ""Pentachlorophenol ND
55.78.39
" " "" " J25.9 2.72 27.9Phenanthrene "" " "" "124 12.3
41.8Phenol "" " "" "46.0 4.01 27.9Pyrene "
"" "" ""Pyridine ND 13912.3"" "" ""1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND
27.99.87"" "" ""2,4,5-Trichlorophenol ND 41.810.7"" ""
""2,4,6-Trichlorophenol ND 41.87.74
" " " "71 % 25-121Surrogate: 2-Fluorophenol" " " "71 %
24-113Surrogate: Phenol-d6" " " "53 % 23-120Surrogate:
Nitrobenzene-d5" " " "60 % 30-115Surrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl" " "
"64 % 19-122Surrogate: 2,4,6-Tribromophenol" " " "56 %
18-137Surrogate: Terphenyl-dl4
The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in
accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical
report must be reproduced in its entirety.
Page 7 of 31
EnviroMatrix Analytical, Inc.
-
Project Name:Pacific AffiliatesClient Name: EMA Log #:
13H0768Sediment Testing 2013
Conventional Chemistry Parameters by Standard/EPA Methods
Analyte Result MDL LimitReporting
Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes
Schneider Dock Composite (13H0768-05) Sediment Sampled: 08/23/13
14:25 Received: 08/27/13 08:003090618 09/06/13 09/06/13 mg/kg dry
14.4 1.4 1.4Ammonia as N SM4500 NH3 B,C3082845 08/28/13 08/29/13 %
"71.8 0.1 0.1% Solids SM 2540 G3090619 08/30/13 08/30/13 mg/kg dry
"5.2 0.1 0.1Total Sulfide EPA 9034
The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in
accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical
report must be reproduced in its entirety.
Page 8 of 31
EnviroMatrix Analytical, Inc.
-
Project Name:Pacific AffiliatesClient Name: EMA Log #:
13H0768Sediment Testing 2013
TPH by EPA 8015B
Analyte Result MDL LimitReporting
Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes
Schneider Dock Composite (13H0768-05) Sediment Sampled: 08/23/13
14:25 Received: 08/27/13 08:00EPA 8015B08/30/13 08/31/13 mg/kg dry
30830101Diesel (C10-C28) ND 10.04.00
"" "" ""Extended Range HC (C28-C40) ND 10.04.00
" " " "90 % 75-129Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene"09/04/13
09/04/13 " 30904234Gasoline (C6-C10) R-06ND 0.5570.334
" " " "109 % 60-160Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in
accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical
report must be reproduced in its entirety.
Page 9 of 31
EnviroMatrix Analytical, Inc.
-
Project Name:Pacific AffiliatesClient Name: EMA Log #:
13H0768Sediment Testing 2013
Organotin Compounds by GC - FPD
Analyte Result MDL LimitReporting
Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes
Schneider Dock Composite (13H0768-05) Sediment Sampled: 08/23/13
14:25 Received: 08/27/13 08:00GC - FPD08/28/13 09/09/13 ug/kg dry
30828531Tetrabutyltin ND 1.391.24
"" "" ""Tributyltin ND 1.391.38"" "" ""Dibutyltin ND 2.791.60""
"" ""Monobutyltin ND 2.790.77"" "" ""Total Organotins ND
1.391.24
" " " "90 % 65-132Surrogate: Tripentyltin" " " "84 %
65-140Surrogate: Tri-n-propyltin
The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in
accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical
report must be reproduced in its entirety.
Page 10 of 31
EnviroMatrix Analytical, Inc.
-
Project Name:Pacific AffiliatesClient Name: EMA Log #:
13H0768Sediment Testing 2013
Result LimitReporting
Units LevelSpike
ResultSource
%REC%RECLimits RPD
RPDLimit Notes Analyte
Total Metals by EPA 6000/7000 Series Methods - Quality
Control
MDL
Batch 3082825
Blank (3082825-BLK1) Prepared: 08/28/13 Analyzed: 08/29/13
Arsenic mg/kg wet0.500ND 0.200Antimony "1.00ND 0.60Cadmium "0.100ND
0.100Lead "0.50ND 0.50Copper "0.500ND 0.400Silver "0.10ND 0.10Zinc
"10.0ND 1.10Nickel "1.00ND 0.200Chromium "1.00ND 0.400
LCS (3082825-BS1) Prepared: 08/28/13 Analyzed: 08/29/13 Chromium
mg/kg wet 10.0 89 75-1255.008.93 2.00Cadmium " 10.0 84
75-1250.5008.38 0.500Copper " 10.0 91 75-1252.509.14 2.00Arsenic "
10.0 83 75-1252.508.28 1.00Nickel " 10.0 92 75-1255.009.16
1.00Silver " 10.0 97 75-1250.509.66 0.50Zinc " 10.0 81 75-125
J50.08.11 5.50Lead " 10.0 100 75-1252.5010.0 2.50Antimony " 10.0 97
75-1255.009.66 3.00
LCS Dup (3082825-BSD1) Prepared: 08/28/13 Analyzed: 08/29/13
Antimony mg/kg wet 10.0 102 75-125 5 205.0010.2 3.00Lead " 10.0 104
75-125 4 202.5010.4 2.50Copper " 10.0 87 75-125 5 202.508.66
2.00Chromium " 10.0 85 75-125 5 205.008.52 2.00Zinc " 10.0 78
75-125 4 20 J50.07.81 5.50Nickel " 10.0 88 75-125 4 205.008.78
1.00Cadmium " 10.0 80 75-125 4 200.5008.03 0.500Silver " 10.0 101
75-125 4 200.5010.1 0.50Arsenic " 10.0 79 75-125 5 202.507.90
1.00
The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in
accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical
report must be reproduced in its entirety.
Page 11 of 31
EnviroMatrix Analytical, Inc.
-
Project Name:Pacific AffiliatesClient Name: EMA Log #:
13H0768Sediment Testing 2013
Result LimitReporting
Units LevelSpike
ResultSource
%REC%RECLimits RPD
RPDLimit Notes Analyte
Total Metals by EPA 6000/7000 Series Methods - Quality
Control
MDL
Batch 3082825
Duplicate (3082825-DUP1) Prepared: 08/28/13 Analyzed: 08/29/13
Source: 13H0606-01Silver mg/kg dry ND 201.36ND 1.36Zinc " 97.0 2 20
J13695.0 30.0Antimony " ND 2013.6ND 8.17Lead " 23.8 0.9 206.8124.0
6.81Nickel " 77.7 0.2 2013.677.5 2.72Copper " 42.6 0.3 206.8142.5
5.45Arsenic " 7.75 8 206.818.38 2.72Chromium " 74.7 0.9 2013.674.0
5.45Cadmium " ND 201.36ND 1.36
Matrix Spike (3082825-MS1) Prepared: 08/28/13 Analyzed: 08/29/13
Source: 13H0606-01Zinc mg/kg dry 13.5 97.0 127 75-125 QM-06,
J135114 29.7Arsenic " 13.5 7.75 78 75-1256.7418.3 2.70Copper " 13.5
42.6 113 75-1256.7457.8 5.39Nickel " 13.5 77.7 133 75-125
QM-0613.595.6 2.70Cadmium " 13.5 ND 78 75-1251.3510.6 1.35Silver "
13.5 ND 84 75-1251.3511.4 1.35Chromium " 13.5 74.7 118
75-12513.590.6 5.39Antimony " 13.5 ND 75-125 QM-0513.5ND 8.09Lead "
13.5 23.8 117 75-1256.7439.5 6.74
Matrix Spike Dup (3082825-MSD1) Prepared: 08/28/13 Analyzed:
08/29/13 Source: 13H0606-01Antimony mg/kg dry 14.2 ND 75-125 20
QM-0514.2ND 8.52Zinc " 14.2 97.0 92 75-125 4 20 J142110 31.2Nickel
" 14.2 77.7 100 75-125 4 2014.291.9 2.84Cadmium " 14.2 ND 80 75-125
7 201.4211.4 1.42Arsenic " 14.2 7.75 82 75-125 6 207.1019.3
2.84Copper " 14.2 42.6 91 75-125 4 207.1055.5 5.68Lead " 14.2 23.8
81 75-125 12 207.1035.2 7.10Silver " 14.2 ND 84 75-125 5 201.4212.0
1.42Chromium " 14.2 74.7 90 75-125 3 2014.287.5 5.68
The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in
accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical
report must be reproduced in its entirety.
Page 12 of 31
EnviroMatrix Analytical, Inc.
-
Project Name:Pacific AffiliatesClient Name: EMA Log #:
13H0768Sediment Testing 2013
Result LimitReporting
Units LevelSpike
ResultSource
%REC%RECLimits RPD
RPDLimit Notes Analyte
Total Metals by EPA 6000/7000 Series Methods - Quality
Control
MDL
Batch 3090428
Blank (3090428-BLK1) Prepared & Analyzed: 09/04/13 Mercury
mg/kg wet0.05ND 0.02
LCS (3090428-BS1) Prepared & Analyzed: 09/04/13 Mercury
mg/kg wet 0.167 96 75-1250.050.16 0.02
LCS Dup (3090428-BSD1) Prepared & Analyzed: 09/04/13 Mercury
mg/kg wet 0.167 99 75-125 2 200.050.16 0.02
Duplicate (3090428-DUP1) Prepared & Analyzed: 09/04/13
Source: 13H0768-05Mercury mg/kg dry 0.06 4 20 J0.070.06 0.03
Matrix Spike (3090428-MS1) Prepared & Analyzed: 09/04/13
Source: 13H0768-05Mercury mg/kg dry 0.131 0.06 95 75-1250.070.18
0.03
Matrix Spike Dup (3090428-MSD1) Prepared & Analyzed:
09/04/13 Source: 13H0768-05Mercury mg/kg dry 0.148 0.06 95 75-125 8
200.070.20 0.03
The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in
accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical
report must be reproduced in its entirety.
Page 13 of 31
EnviroMatrix Analytical, Inc.
-
Project Name:Pacific AffiliatesClient Name: EMA Log #:
13H0768Sediment Testing 2013
Result LimitReporting
Units LevelSpike
ResultSource
%REC%RECLimits RPD
RPDLimit Notes Analyte
Organochlorine Pesticides by EPA Method 8081B - Quality
Control
MDL
Batch 3082854
Blank (3082854-BLK1) Prepared: 08/28/13 Analyzed: 09/11/13
Aldrin ug/kg wet2.00ND 0.51alpha-BHC "2.00ND 0.27beta-BHC "2.00ND
0.43gamma-BHC (Lindane) "2.00ND 0.35delta-BHC "2.00ND
0.41alpha-Chlordane "5.00ND 0.47gamma-Chlordane "5.00ND
0.51Chlordane (Total) "5.00ND 4.702,4´-DDD "2.00ND 1.214,4´-DDD
"2.00ND 0.492,4´-DDE "2.00ND 1.104,4´-DDE "2.00ND 0.472,4´-DDT
"2.00ND 1.004,4´-DDT "2.00ND 0.32Dieldrin "2.00ND 0.47Endosulfan I
"2.00ND 0.42Endosulfan II "2.00ND 0.76Endosulfan sulfate "2.00ND
0.48Endrin "2.00ND 0.49Endrin aldehyde "2.00ND 0.30Endrin ketone
"2.00ND 0.80Heptachlor "2.00ND 0.71Heptachlor epoxide "2.00ND
0.70Methoxychlor "2.00ND 0.74Toxaphene "20.0ND 8.80
" 16.7 26-146Surrogate: TCMX 6110.2
LCS (3082854-BS1) Prepared: 08/28/13 Analyzed: 09/11/13 Aldrin
ug/kg wet 16.7 57 42-1222.009.58 0.51gamma-BHC (Lindane) " 16.7 56
32-1272.009.28 0.354,4´-DDT " 16.7 61 25-1602.0010.2 0.32Dieldrin "
16.7 64 36-1462.0010.6 0.47Endrin " 16.7 61 30-1472.0010.1
0.49Heptachlor " 16.7 64 34-1112.0010.7 0.71
" 16.7 26-146Surrogate: TCMX 549.04
The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in
accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical
report must be reproduced in its entirety.
Page 14 of 31
EnviroMatrix Analytical, Inc.
-
Project Name:Pacific AffiliatesClient Name: EMA Log #:
13H0768Sediment Testing 2013
Result LimitReporting
Units LevelSpike
ResultSource
%REC%RECLimits RPD
RPDLimit Notes Analyte
Organochlorine Pesticides by EPA Method 8081B - Quality
Control
MDL
Batch 3082854
LCS Dup (3082854-BSD1) Prepared: 08/28/13 Analyzed: 09/11/13
Aldrin ug/kg wet 16.7 59 42-122 2 302.009.81 0.51gamma-BHC
(Lindane) " 16.7 57 32-127 2 302.009.45 0.354,4´-DDT " 16.7 78
25-160 24 302.0012.9 0.32Dieldrin " 16.7 65 36-146 3 302.0010.9
0.47Endrin " 16.7 63 30-147 3 302.0010.4 0.49Heptachlor " 16.7 64
34-111 0.07 302.0010.7 0.71
" 16.7 26-146Surrogate: TCMX 549.07
Duplicate (3082854-DUP1) Prepared: 08/28/13 Analyzed: 09/11/13
Source: 13H0606-01Aldrin ug/kg dry ND 305.39ND 1.38alpha-BHC " ND
305.39ND 0.73beta-BHC " ND 305.39ND 1.16gamma-BHC (Lindane) " ND
305.39ND 0.94delta-BHC " ND 305.39ND 1.11alpha-Chlordane " ND
3013.5ND 1.27gamma-Chlordane " ND 3013.5ND 1.38Chlordane (Total) "
ND 3013.5ND 12.72,4´-DDD " ND 305.39ND 3.264,4´-DDD " ND 305.39ND
1.322,4´-DDE " ND 305.39ND 2.974,4´-DDE " ND 305.39ND 1.272,4´-DDT
" ND 305.39ND 2.704,4´-DDT " ND 305.39ND 0.86Dieldrin " ND 305.39ND
1.27Endosulfan I " ND 305.39ND 1.13Endosulfan II " ND 305.39ND
2.05Endosulfan sulfate " ND 305.39ND 1.29Endrin " ND 305.39ND
1.32Endrin aldehyde " ND 305.39ND 0.81Endrin ketone " ND 305.39ND
2.16Heptachlor " ND 305.39ND 1.91Heptachlor epoxide " ND 305.39ND
1.89Methoxychlor " ND 305.39ND 2.00Toxaphene " ND 3053.9ND
23.7trans-Nonachlor " ND 3013.5ND 2.70
" 44.9 26-146Surrogate: TCMX 5826.0
The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in
accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical
report must be reproduced in its entirety.
Page 15 of 31
EnviroMatrix Analytical, Inc.
-
Project Name:Pacific AffiliatesClient Name: EMA Log #:
13H0768Sediment Testing 2013
Result LimitReporting
Units LevelSpike
ResultSource
%REC%RECLimits RPD
RPDLimit Notes Analyte
Organochlorine Pesticides by EPA Method 8081B - Quality
Control
MDL
Batch 3082854
Matrix Spike (3082854-MS1) Prepared: 08/28/13 Analyzed: 09/11/13
Source: 13H0768-05Aldrin ug/kg dry 23.2 ND 70 42-1225.5716.2
1.42gamma-BHC (Lindane) " 23.2 ND 56 32-1275.5713.1 0.984,4´-DDT "
23.2 ND 80 25-1605.5718.6 0.89Dieldrin " 23.2 ND 70 36-1465.5716.2
1.31Endrin " 23.2 ND 72 30-1475.5716.6 1.37Heptachlor " 23.2 ND 73
34-1115.5716.9 1.98
" 23.2 26-146Surrogate: TCMX 6715.5
Matrix Spike Dup (3082854-MSD1) Prepared: 08/28/13 Analyzed:
09/12/13 Source: 13H0768-05Aldrin ug/kg dry 23.2 ND 78 42-122 11
305.5718.1 1.42gamma-BHC (Lindane) " 23.2 ND 64 32-127 12
305.5714.8 0.984,4´-DDT " 23.2 ND 84 25-160 5 305.5719.6
0.89Dieldrin " 23.2 ND 74 36-146 6 305.5717.1 1.31Endrin " 23.2 ND
71 30-147 0.8 305.5716.5 1.37Heptachlor " 23.2 ND 79 34-111 9
305.5718.4 1.98
" 23.2 26-146Surrogate: TCMX 7316.9
The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in
accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical
report must be reproduced in its entirety.
Page 16 of 31
EnviroMatrix Analytical, Inc.
-
Project Name:Pacific AffiliatesClient Name: EMA Log #:
13H0768Sediment Testing 2013
Result LimitReporting
Units LevelSpike
ResultSource
%REC%RECLimits RPD
RPDLimit Notes Analyte
Polychlorinated Biphenyls by EPA Method 8082 - Quality
Control
MDL
Batch 3082854
Blank (3082854-BLK1) Prepared: 08/28/13 Analyzed: 09/11/13
Aroclor 1016 ug/kg wet10.0ND 4.68Aroclor 1221 "10.0ND 4.68Aroclor
1232 "10.0ND 4.68Aroclor 1242 "10.0ND 4.68Aroclor 1248 "10.0ND
4.68Aroclor 1254 "10.0ND 4.68Aroclor 1260 "10.0ND 4.68
" 16.7 26-146Surrogate: TCMX 6110.2
LCS (3082854-BS2) Prepared: 08/28/13 Analyzed: 09/11/13 Aroclor
1260 ug/kg wet 167 51 8-12710.084.9 4.68
" 16.7 26-146Surrogate: TCMX 579.52
LCS Dup (3082854-BSD2) Prepared: 08/28/13 Analyzed: 09/11/13
Aroclor 1260 ug/kg wet 167 55 8-127 7 3010.091.4 4.68
" 16.7 26-146Surrogate: TCMX 579.45
Duplicate (3082854-DUP1) Prepared: 08/28/13 Analyzed: 09/11/13
Source: 13H0606-01Aroclor 1016 ug/kg dry ND 3027.0ND 12.6Aroclor
1221 " ND 3027.0ND 12.6Aroclor 1232 " ND 3027.0ND 12.6Aroclor 1242
" ND 3027.0ND 12.6Aroclor 1248 " ND 3027.0ND 12.6Aroclor 1254 " ND
3027.0ND 12.6Aroclor 1260 " ND 3027.0ND 12.6
" 44.9 26-146Surrogate: TCMX 5826.0
Matrix Spike (3082854-MS2) Prepared: 08/28/13 Analyzed: 09/11/13
Source: 13H0606-01Aroclor 1260 ug/kg dry 449 ND 63 8-127135284
63.1
" 44.9 26-146Surrogate: TCMX 7533.6
The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in
accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical
report must be reproduced in its entirety.
Page 17 of 31
EnviroMatrix Analytical, Inc.
-
Project Name:Pacific AffiliatesClient Name: EMA Log #:
13H0768Sediment Testing 2013
Result LimitReporting
Units LevelSpike
ResultSource
%REC%RECLimits RPD
RPDLimit Notes Analyte
Polychlorinated Biphenyls by EPA Method 8082 - Quality
Control
MDL
Batch 3082854
Matrix Spike Dup (3082854-MSD2) Prepared: 08/28/13 Analyzed:
09/12/13 Source: 13H0606-01Aroclor 1260 ug/kg dry 449 ND 71 8-127
12 30135320 63.1
" 44.9 26-146Surrogate: TCMX 7131.9
The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in
accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical
report must be reproduced in its entirety.
Page 18 of 31
EnviroMatrix Analytical, Inc.
-
Project Name:Pacific AffiliatesClient Name: EMA Log #:
13H0768Sediment Testing 2013
Result LimitReporting
Units LevelSpike
ResultSource
%REC%RECLimits RPD
RPDLimit Notes Analyte
Semivolatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8270C - Quality
Control
MDL
Batch 3090446
Blank (3090446-BLK1) Prepared: 09/04/13 Analyzed: 09/09/13
Acenaphthene ug/kg wet20.0ND 5.12Acenaphthylene "20.0ND
5.37Anthracene "20.0ND 2.82Benzidine "150ND 150Benzo (a) anthracene
"20.0ND 3.09Benzo (b) fluoranthene "20.0ND 3.09Benzo (k)
fluoranthene "20.0ND 3.68Benzo (g,h,i) perylene "40.0ND 4.63Benzo
(a) pyrene "20.0ND 3.07Benzyl alcohol "75.0ND
1.44Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane "20.0ND 7.26Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
"25.0ND 7.96Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether "25.0ND
8.81Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate "45.0ND 5.724-Bromophenyl phenyl
ether "20.0ND 3.71Butyl benzyl phthalate "40.0ND 4.11Carbazole
"60.0ND 4.944-Chloroaniline "100ND 4.424-Chloro-3-methylphenol
"20.0ND 8.342-Chloronaphthalene "20.0ND 6.112-Chlorophenol "20.0ND
6.484-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether "20.0ND 4.90Chrysene "20.0ND
2.87Dibenz (a,h) anthracene "40.0ND 5.00Dibenzofuran "20.0ND
5.42Di-n-butyl phthalate "40.0ND 3.871,2-Dichlorobenzene "20.0ND
9.071,3-Dichlorobenzene "20.0ND 8.511,4-Dichlorobenzene "20.0ND
8.553,3´-Dichlorobenzidine "150ND 5.262,4-Dichlorophenol "20.0ND
5.32Diethyl phthalate "20.0ND 1.612,4-Dimethylphenol "80.0ND
2.40Dimethyl phthalate "20.0ND 3.364,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
"50.0ND 5.502,4-Dinitrophenol "100ND 10.92,4-Dinitrotoluene "20.0ND
4.082,6-Dinitrotoluene "20.0ND 6.02
The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in
accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical
report must be reproduced in its entirety.
Page 19 of 31
EnviroMatrix Analytical, Inc.
-
Project Name:Pacific AffiliatesClient Name: EMA Log #:
13H0768Sediment Testing 2013
Result LimitReporting
Units LevelSpike
ResultSource
%REC%RECLimits RPD
RPDLimit Notes Analyte
Semivolatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8270C - Quality
Control
MDL
Batch 3090446
Blank (3090446-BLK1) Prepared: 09/04/13 Analyzed: 09/09/13
Di-n-octyl phthalate ug/kg wet40.0ND 4.61Fluoranthene "20.0ND
3.43Fluorene "20.0ND 4.50Hexachlorobenzene "20.0ND
3.10Hexachlorobutadiene "20.0ND 7.09Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
"50.0ND 6.98Hexachloroethane "20.0ND 8.88Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene
"30.0ND 4.33Isophorone "20.0ND 7.562-Methylnaphthalene "20.0ND
7.622-Methylphenol "20.0ND 6.564-Methylphenol (3-Methylphenol)
"40.0ND 6.24Naphthalene "20.0ND 7.252-Nitroaniline "50.0ND
3.913-Nitroaniline "100ND 6.544-Nitroaniline "70.0ND
5.49Nitrobenzene "20.0ND 8.042-Nitrophenol "20.0ND
7.564-Nitrophenol "70.0ND 2.85N-Nitrosodimethylamine "20.0ND
8.02N-Nitrosodiphenylamine "35.0ND 8.02N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
"30.0ND 7.90Pentachlorophenol "40.0ND 6.02Phenanthrene "20.0ND
1.95Phenol "30.0ND 8.81Pyrene "20.0ND 2.88Pyridine "100ND
8.851,2,4-Trichlorobenzene "20.0ND 7.082,4,5-Trichlorophenol
"30.0ND 7.662,4,6-Trichlorophenol "30.0ND 5.55
" 231 25-121Surrogate: 2-Fluorophenol 77179" 231
24-113Surrogate: Phenol-d6 79182" 231 23-120Surrogate:
Nitrobenzene-d5 56129" 231 30-115Surrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 63146"
231 19-122Surrogate: 2,4,6-Tribromophenol 57132" 231
18-137Surrogate: Terphenyl-dl4 65150
The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in
accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical
report must be reproduced in its entirety.
Page 20 of 31
EnviroMatrix Analytical, Inc.
-
Project Name:Pacific AffiliatesClient Name: EMA Log #:
13H0768Sediment Testing 2013
Result LimitReporting
Units LevelSpike
ResultSource
%REC%RECLimits RPD
RPDLimit Notes Analyte
Semivolatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8270C - Quality
Control
MDL
Batch 3090446
LCS (3090446-BS1) Prepared: 09/04/13 Analyzed: 09/09/13
Acenaphthene ug/kg wet 231 73 50-13520.0170
5.124-Chloro-3-methylphenol " 231 75 34-14220.0174
8.342-Chlorophenol " 231 80 38-12520.0185 6.48Di-n-butyl phthalate
" 231 57 44-15240.0133 3.871,4-Dichlorobenzene " 231 70
48-12520.0162 8.552,4-Dinitrotoluene " 231 79 41-14420.0182
4.084-Nitrophenol " 231 94 10-15570.0217
2.85N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine " 231 95 28-15630.0221
7.90Pentachlorophenol " 231 54 21-13340.0124 6.02Phenol " 231 81
35-12030.0186 8.81Pyrene " 231 70 40-15220.0162
2.881,2,4-Trichlorobenzene " 231 73 47-12520.0169 7.08
" 231 25-121Surrogate: 2-Fluorophenol 73169" 231
24-113Surrogate: Phenol-d6 81188" 231 23-120Surrogate:
Nitrobenzene-d5 54125" 231 30-115Surrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl
3581.4" 231 19-122Surrogate: 2,4,6-Tribromophenol 54124" 231
18-137Surrogate: Terphenyl-dl4 58134
LCS Dup (3090446-BSD1) Prepared: 09/04/13 Analyzed: 09/09/13
Acenaphthene ug/kg wet 231 78 50-135 7 3020.0181
5.124-Chloro-3-methylphenol " 231 72 34-142 4 3020.0167
8.342-Chlorophenol " 231 75 38-125 6 3020.0174 6.48Di-n-butyl
phthalate " 231 68 44-152 17 3040.0157 3.871,4-Dichlorobenzene "
231 70 48-125 0.02 3020.0162 8.552,4-Dinitrotoluene " 231 83 41-144
6 3020.0192 4.084-Nitrophenol " 231 90 10-155 4 3070.0209
2.85N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine " 231 98 28-156 2 3030.0226
7.90Pentachlorophenol " 231 52 21-133 2 3040.0121 6.02Phenol " 231
76 35-120 6 3030.0175 8.81Pyrene " 231 75 40-152 7 3020.0174
2.881,2,4-Trichlorobenzene " 231 76 47-125 4 3020.0176 7.08
" 231 25-121Surrogate: 2-Fluorophenol 72166" 231
24-113Surrogate: Phenol-d6 70161" 231 23-120Surrogate:
Nitrobenzene-d5 53122" 231 30-115Surrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 61140"
231 19-122Surrogate: 2,4,6-Tribromophenol 56129" 231
18-137Surrogate: Terphenyl-dl4 58133
The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in
accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical
report must be reproduced in its entirety.
Page 21 of 31
EnviroMatrix Analytical, Inc.
-
Project Name:Pacific AffiliatesClient Name: EMA Log #:
13H0768Sediment Testing 2013
Result LimitReporting
Units LevelSpike
ResultSource
%REC%RECLimits RPD
RPDLimit Notes Analyte
Semivolatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8270C - Quality
Control
MDL
Batch 3090446
Duplicate (3090446-DUP1) Prepared: 09/04/13 Analyzed: 09/09/13
Source: 13H0768-05Acenaphthene ug/kg dry ND 3027.9ND
7.14Acenaphthylene " ND 3027.9ND 7.48Anthracene " 4.99 2 30
J27.94.91 3.93Benzidine " ND 30209ND 209Benzo (a) anthracene " 14.5
20 30 J27.917.7 4.31Benzo (b) fluoranthene " 15.5 13 30 J27.917.8
4.31Benzo (k) fluoranthene " 7.19 15 30 J27.98.35 5.13Benzo (g,h,i)
perylene " ND 3055.7ND 6.45Benzo (a) pyrene " 8.03 28 30 J27.910.6
4.28Benzyl alcohol " ND 30105ND 2.01Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane " ND
3027.9ND 10.1Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether " ND 3034.8ND
11.1Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether " ND 3034.8ND
12.3Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate " 16.2 3062.7ND 7.974-Bromophenyl
phenyl ether " ND 3027.9ND 5.17Butyl benzyl phthalate " ND 3055.7ND
5.73Carbazole " ND 3083.6ND 6.894-Chloroaniline " ND 30139ND
6.164-Chloro-3-methylphenol " ND 3027.9ND 11.62-Chloronaphthalene "
ND 3027.9ND 8.522-Chlorophenol " ND 3027.9ND 9.034-Chlorophenyl
phenyl ether " ND 3027.9ND 6.83Chrysene " 18.2 12 30 J27.920.6
4.00Dibenz (a,h) anthracene " ND 3055.7ND 6.97Dibenzofuran " 8.63
3027.9ND 7.55Di-n-butyl phthalate " 44.9 117 30 QR-02, J55.711.8
5.391,2-Dichlorobenzene " ND 3027.9ND 12.61,3-Dichlorobenzene " ND
3027.9ND 11.91,4-Dichlorobenzene " ND 3027.9ND
11.93,3´-Dichlorobenzidine " ND 30209ND 7.332,4-Dichlorophenol " ND
3027.9ND 7.41Diethyl phthalate " 3.61 3027.9ND
2.242,4-Dimethylphenol " ND 30111ND 3.34Dimethyl phthalate " ND
3027.9ND 4.684,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol " ND 3069.7ND
7.672,4-Dinitrophenol " ND 30139ND 15.22,4-Dinitrotoluene " ND
3027.9ND 5.692,6-Dinitrotoluene " ND 3027.9ND 8.39Di-n-octyl
phthalate " ND 3055.7ND 6.43
The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in
accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical
report must be reproduced in its entirety.
Page 22 of 31
EnviroMatrix Analytical, Inc.
-
Project Name:Pacific AffiliatesClient Name: EMA Log #:
13H0768Sediment Testing 2013
Result LimitReporting
Units LevelSpike
ResultSource
%REC%RECLimits RPD
RPDLimit Notes Analyte
Semivolatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8270C - Quality
Control
MDL
Batch 3090446
Duplicate (3090446-DUP1) Prepared: 09/04/13 Analyzed: 09/09/13
Source: 13H0768-05Fluoranthene ug/kg dry 32.7 29 30 J27.924.5
4.78Fluorene " 9.69 3027.9ND 6.27Hexachlorobenzene " ND 3027.9ND
4.32Hexachlorobutadiene " ND 3027.9ND 9.88Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
" ND 3069.7ND 9.73Hexachloroethane " ND 3027.9ND 12.4Indeno
(1,2,3-cd) pyrene " ND 3041.8ND 6.03Isophorone " ND 3027.9ND
10.52-Methylnaphthalene " 18.6 5 30 J27.917.7 10.62-Methylphenol "
ND 3027.9ND 9.144-Methylphenol (3-Methylphenol) " 58.8 16 30
J55.750.4 8.70Naphthalene " 37.8 0.1 3027.937.7 10.12-Nitroaniline
" ND 3069.7ND 5.453-Nitroaniline " ND 30139ND 9.114-Nitroaniline "
ND 3097.6ND 7.65Nitrobenzene " ND 3027.9ND 11.22-Nitrophenol " ND
3027.9ND 10.54-Nitrophenol " ND 3097.6ND 3.97N-Nitrosodimethylamine
" ND 20027.9ND 11.2N-Nitrosodiphenylamine " ND 3048.8ND
11.2N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine " ND 3041.8ND 11.0Pentachlorophenol "
ND 3055.7ND 8.39Phenanthrene " 25.9 16 30 J27.922.1 2.72Phenol "
124 11 3041.8111 12.3Pyrene " 46.0 21 3027.937.1 4.01Pyridine " ND
30139ND 12.31,2,4-Trichlorobenzene " ND 3027.9ND
9.872,4,5-Trichlorophenol " ND 3041.8ND 10.72,4,6-Trichlorophenol "
ND 3041.8ND 7.74
" 323 25-121Surrogate: 2-Fluorophenol 69222" 323
24-113Surrogate: Phenol-d6 71228" 323 23-120Surrogate:
Nitrobenzene-d5 46148" 323 30-115Surrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 52168"
323 19-122Surrogate: 2,4,6-Tribromophenol 64206" 323
18-137Surrogate: Terphenyl-dl4 53170
The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in
accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical
report must be reproduced in its entirety.
Page 23 of 31
EnviroMatrix Analytical, Inc.
-
Project Name:Pacific AffiliatesClient Name: EMA Log #:
13H0768Sediment Testing 2013
Result LimitReporting
Units LevelSpike
ResultSource
%REC%RECLimits RPD
RPDLimit Notes Analyte
Semivolatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8270C - Quality
Control
MDL
Batch 3090446
Matrix Spike (3090446-MS1) Prepared: 09/04/13 Analyzed: 09/09/13
Source: 13H0768-05Acenaphthene ug/kg dry 323 ND 76 46-14027.9244
7.144-Chloro-3-methylphenol " 323 ND 74 42-13927.9238
11.62-Chlorophenol " 323 ND 77 30-13527.9249 9.03Di-n-butyl
phthalate " 323 44.9 49 24-15255.7204 5.391,4-Dichlorobenzene " 323
ND 62 36-13727.9199 11.92,4-Dinitrotoluene " 323 ND 79
28-14527.9255 5.694-Nitrophenol " 323 ND 108 23-15097.6348
3.97N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine " 323 ND 96 31-16141.8310
11.0Pentachlorophenol " 323 ND 59 3-15955.7190 8.39Phenol " 323 124
73 31-13841.8360 12.3Pyrene " 323 46.0 63 30-15227.9250
4.011,2,4-Trichlorobenzene " 323 ND 66 39-13427.9212 9.87
" 323 25-121Surrogate: 2-Fluorophenol 68218" 323
24-113Surrogate: Phenol-d6 75242" 323 23-120Surrogate:
Nitrobenzene-d5 48156" 323 30-115Surrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 57183"
323 19-122Surrogate: 2,4,6-Tribromophenol 66213" 323
18-137Surrogate: Terphenyl-dl4 53172
Matrix Spike Dup (3090446-MSD1) Prepared: 09/04/13 Analyzed:
09/09/13 Source: 13H0768-05Acenaphthene ug/kg dry 323 ND 68 46-140
11 3027.9219 7.144-Chloro-3-methylphenol " 323 ND 70 42-139 5
3027.9226 11.62-Chlorophenol " 323 ND 69 30-135 11 3027.9223
9.03Di-n-butyl phthalate " 323 44.9 57 24-152 11 3055.7228
5.391,4-Dichlorobenzene " 323 ND 55 36-137 12 3027.9177
11.92,4-Dinitrotoluene " 323 ND 68 28-145 15 3027.9219
5.694-Nitrophenol " 323 ND 92 23-150 16 3097.6296
3.97N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine " 323 ND 85 31-161 13 3041.8273
11.0Pentachlorophenol " 323 ND 58 3-159 2 3055.7187 8.39Phenol "
323 124 70 31-138 3 3041.8350 12.3Pyrene " 323 46.0 64 30-152 0.4
3027.9251 4.011,2,4-Trichlorobenzene " 323 ND 60 39-134 10
3027.9193 9.87
" 323 25-121Surrogate: 2-Fluorophenol 61198" 323
24-113Surrogate: Phenol-d6 73235" 323 23-120Surrogate:
Nitrobenzene-d5 45147" 323 30-115Surrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 52167"
323 19-122Surrogate: 2,4,6-Tribromophenol 62201" 323
18-137Surrogate: Terphenyl-dl4 51164
The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in
accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical
report must be reproduced in its entirety.
Page 24 of 31
EnviroMatrix Analytical, Inc.
-
Project Name:Pacific AffiliatesClient Name: EMA Log #:
13H0768Sediment Testing 2013
Result LimitReporting
Units LevelSpike
ResultSource
%REC%RECLimits RPD
RPDLimit Notes Analyte
Conventional Chemistry Parameters by Standard/EPA Methods -
Quality Control
MDL
Batch 3082845
Duplicate (3082845-DUP1) Prepared: 08/28/13 Analyzed: 08/29/13
Source: 13H0606-01% Solids % 37.1 0.3 200.137.2 0.1
Batch 3090618
Blank (3090618-BLK1) Prepared & Analyzed: 09/06/13 Ammonia
as N mg/kg wet0.1ND 0.1
LCS (3090618-BS1) Prepared & Analyzed: 09/06/13 Ammonia as N
mg/kg wet 1.00 90 80-1200.10.9 0.1
LCS Dup (3090618-BSD1) Prepared & Analyzed: 09/06/13 Ammonia
as N mg/kg wet 1.00 88 80-120 2 200.10.9 0.1
Duplicate (3090618-DUP1) Prepared & Analyzed: 09/06/13
Source: 13H0800-01Ammonia as N mg/kg dry 10.9 1 201.611.1 1.6
Matrix Spike (3090618-MS1) Prepared & Analyzed: 09/06/13
Source: 13H0800-01Ammonia as N mg/kg dry 15.6 10.9 91 80-1201.625.1
1.6
Matrix Spike Dup (3090618-MSD1) Prepared & Analyzed:
09/06/13 Source: 13H0800-01Ammonia as N mg/kg dry 15.6 10.9 87
80-120 2 201.624.5 1.6
Batch 3090619
Blank (3090619-BLK1) Prepared & Analyzed: 08/30/13 Total
Sulfide mg/kg wet0.002ND 0.002
The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in
accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical
report must be reproduced in its entirety.
Page 25 of 31
EnviroMatrix Analytical, Inc.
-
Project Name:Pacific AffiliatesClient Name: EMA Log #:
13H0768Sediment Testing 2013
Result LimitReporting
Units LevelSpike
ResultSource
%REC%RECLimits RPD
RPDLimit Notes Analyte
Conventional Chemistry Parameters by Standard/EPA Methods -
Quality Control
MDL
Batch 3090619
LCS (3090619-BS1) Prepared & Analyzed: 08/30/13 Total
Sulfide mg/kg wet 0.200 88 75-1250.0020.2 0.002
LCS Dup (3090619-BSD1) Prepared & Analyzed: 08/30/13 Total
Sulfide mg/kg wet 0.200 92 75-125 4 200.0020.2 0.002
Calibration Check (3090619-CCV1) Prepared & Analyzed:
08/30/13 Total Sulfide mg/kg wet 0.100 91 0-2000.0020.09 0.002
Duplicate (3090619-DUP1) Prepared & Analyzed: 08/30/13
Source: 13H0800-01Total Sulfide mg/kg dry 0.2 0 200.20.2 0.2
Matrix Spike (3090619-MS1) Prepared & Analyzed: 08/30/13
Source: 13H0800-01Total Sulfide mg/kg dry 15.6 0.2 126 75-125
QM-050.219.8 0.2
Matrix Spike Dup (3090619-MSD1) Prepared & Analyzed:
08/30/13 Source: 13H0800-01Total Sulfide mg/kg dry 15.6 0.2 130
75-125 3 20 QM-050.220.4 0.2
The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in
accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical
report must be reproduced in its entirety.
Page 26 of 31
EnviroMatrix Analytical, Inc.
-
Project Name:Pacific AffiliatesClient Name: EMA Log #:
13H0768Sediment Testing 2013
Result LimitReporting
Units LevelSpike
ResultSource
%REC%RECLimits RPD
RPDLimit Notes Analyte
TPH by EPA 8015B - Quality Control
MDL
Batch 3083010
Blank (3083010-BLK1) Prepared: 08/30/13 Analyzed: 08/31/13
Diesel (C10-C28) mg/kg dry10.0ND 4.00Extended Range HC (C28-C40)
"10.0ND 4.00
" 50.0 75-129Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 9145.3
LCS (3083010-BS1) Prepared: 08/30/13 Analyzed: 08/31/13 Diesel
(C10-C28) mg/kg dry 500 95 75-12510.0474 4.00
" 50.0 75-129Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 8944.6
LCS Dup (3083010-BSD1) Prepared: 08/30/13 Analyzed: 08/31/13
Diesel (C10-C28) mg/kg dry 500 100 75-125 6 3010.0501 4.00
" 50.0 75-129Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 9044.8
Duplicate (3083010-DUP1) Prepared: 08/30/13 Analyzed: 08/31/13
Source: 13H0800-01Diesel (C10-C28) mg/kg dry 110 3010.0ND
4.00Extended Range HC (C28-C40) " ND 3010.0ND 4.00
" 50.0 75-129Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 9044.8
Matrix Spike (3083010-MS1) Prepared: 08/30/13 Analyzed: 08/31/13
Source: 13H0800-01Diesel (C10-C28) mg/kg dry 500 110 75
75-12510.0484 4.00
" 50.0 75-129Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 9447.1
Matrix Spike Dup (3083010-MSD1) Prepared: 08/30/13 Analyzed:
08/31/13 Source: 13H0800-01Diesel (C10-C28) mg/kg dry 500 110 77
75-125 2 3010.0494 4.00
" 50.0 75-129Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 9346.7
Batch 3090423
Blank (3090423-BLK1) Prepared & Analyzed: 09/04/13 Gasoline
(C6-C10) mg/kg wet0.100ND 0.0600
" 0.0625 60-160Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 1110.0696
The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in
accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical
report must be reproduced in its entirety.
Page 27 of 31
EnviroMatrix Analytical, Inc.
-
Project Name:Pacific AffiliatesClient Name: EMA Log #:
13H0768Sediment Testing 2013
Result LimitReporting
Units LevelSpike
ResultSource
%REC%RECLimits RPD
RPDLimit Notes Analyte
TPH by EPA 8015B - Quality Control
MDL
Batch 3090423
LCS (3090423-BS1) Prepared & Analyzed: 09/04/13 Gasoline
(C6-C10) mg/kg wet 0.500 92 70-1300.1000.460 0.0600
" 0.0625 60-160Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 1080.0674
LCS Dup (3090423-BSD1) Prepared & Analyzed: 09/04/13
Gasoline (C6-C10) mg/kg wet 0.500 92 70-130 0.05 300.1000.460
0.0600
" 0.0625 60-160Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 1100.0688
Duplicate (3090423-DUP1) Prepared & Analyzed: 09/04/13
Source: 13H0768-05Gasoline (C6-C10) mg/kg dry ND 30 R-060.557ND
0.334
" 0.0871 60-160Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 1040.0903
Matrix Spike (3090423-MS1) Prepared & Analyzed: 09/04/13
Source: 13H0768-05Gasoline (C6-C10) mg/kg dry 0.697 ND 99
60-1400.1390.693 0.0836
" 0.0871 60-160Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 1090.0948
Matrix Spike Dup (3090423-MSD1) Prepared & Analyzed:
09/04/13 Source: 13H0768-05Gasoline (C6-C10) mg/kg dry 0.697 ND 85
60-140 15 300.1390.594 0.0836
" 0.0871 60-160Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 1220.107
The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in
accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical
report must be reproduced in its entirety.
Page 28 of 31
EnviroMatrix Analytical, Inc.
-
Project Name:Pacific AffiliatesClient Name: EMA Log #:
13H0768Sediment Testing 2013
Result LimitReporting
Units LevelSpike
ResultSource
%REC%RECLimits RPD
RPDLimit Notes Analyte
Organotin Compounds by GC - FPD - Quality Control
MDL
Batch 3082853
Blank (3082853-BLK1) Prepared: 08/28/13 Analyzed: 09/09/13
Tetrabutyltin ug/kg wet1.00ND 0.89Tributyltin "1.00ND
0.99Dibutyltin "2.00ND 1.15Monobutyltin "2.00ND 0.55Total
Organotins "1.00ND 0.89
" 25.0 65-132Surrogate: Tripentyltin 8922.3" 25.0
65-140Surrogate: Tri-n-propyltin 10325.7
LCS (3082853-BS1) Prepared: 08/28/13 Analyzed: 09/09/13
Tetrabutyltin ug/kg wet 25.0 98 75-1151.0024.6 0.89Tributyltin "
25.0 91 58-1281.0022.7 0.99Dibutyltin " 25.0 102 39-1502.0025.5
1.15Monobutyltin " 25.0 95 0-1402.0023.7 0.55
" 25.0 65-132Surrogate: Tripentyltin 9724.4" 25.0
65-140Surrogate: Tri-n-propyltin 10626.6
LCS Dup (3082853-BSD1) Prepared: 08/28/13 Analyzed: 09/09/13
Tetrabutyltin ug/kg wet 25.0 94 75-115 4 301.0023.6 0.89Tributyltin
" 25.0 85 58-128 7 301.0021.2 0.99Dibutyltin " 25.0 99 39-150 3
302.0024.8 1.15Monobutyltin " 25.0 90 0-140 5 302.0022.4 0.55
" 25.0 65-132Surrogate: Tripentyltin 8521.2" 25.0
65-140Surrogate: Tri-n-propyltin 9924.7
Duplicate (3082853-DUP1) Prepared: 08/28/13 Analyzed: 09/09/13
Source: 13H0606-01Tetrabutyltin ug/kg dry ND 302.70ND
2.40Tributyltin " ND 302.70ND 2.67Dibutyltin " ND 305.39ND
3.10Monobutyltin " ND 305.39ND 1.48Total Organotins " ND 302.70ND
2.40
" 67.4 65-132Surrogate: Tripentyltin 8255.0" 67.4
65-140Surrogate: Tri-n-propyltin 9362.8
The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in
accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical
report must be reproduced in its entirety.
Page 29 of 31
EnviroMatrix Analytical, Inc.
-
Project Name:Pacific AffiliatesClient Name: EMA Log #:
13H0768Sediment Testing 2013
Result LimitReporting
Units LevelSpike
ResultSource
%REC%RECLimits RPD
RPDLimit Notes Analyte
Organotin Compounds by GC - FPD - Quality Control
MDL
Batch 3082853
Matrix Spike (3082853-MS1) Prepared: 08/28/13 Analyzed: 09/09/13
Source: 13H0606-01Tetrabutyltin ug/kg dry 67.4 ND 105
74-1152.7070.7 2.40Tributyltin " 67.4 ND 84 45-1392.7056.9
2.67Dibutyltin " 67.4 ND 71 0-1655.3947.6 3.10Monobutyltin " 67.4
ND 36 0-1405.3924.0 1.48
" 67.4 65-132Surrogate: Tripentyltin 9865.9" 67.4
65-140Surrogate: Tri-n-propyltin 11678.0
Matrix Spike Dup (3082853-MSD1) Prepared: 08/28/13 Analyzed:
09/09/13 Source: 13H0606-01Tetrabutyltin ug/kg dry 67.4 ND 100
74-115 5 302.7067.4 2.40Tributyltin " 67.4 ND 105 45-139 22
302.7070.9 2.67Dibutyltin " 67.4 ND 64 0-165 10 305.3943.1
3.10Monobutyltin " 67.4 ND 37 0-140 3 305.3924.8 1.48
" 67.4 65-132Surrogate: Tripentyltin 10570.8" 67.4
65-140Surrogate: Tri-n-propyltin 11376.0
The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in
accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical
report must be reproduced in its entirety.
Page 30 of 31
EnviroMatrix Analytical, Inc.
-
Project Name:Pacific AffiliatesClient Name: EMA Log #:
13H0768Sediment Testing 2013
Notes and Definitions
R-06 Sample dilution was necessary due to nature of the
matrix.
QR-02 The RPD result exceeded the QC limits due to
non-homogeneity of sample.
QM-06 Due to noted non-homogeneity of the QC sample matrix, the
MS/MSD did not provide reliable results for accuracy and precision.
Sample results for the QC batch were accepted based on LCS/LCSD
percent recoveries and RPD values.
QM-05 The spike recovery was outside acceptance limits for the
MS and/or MSD due to matrix interference. The LCS and/or LCSD were
within acceptance limits showing that the laboratory is in control
and the data is acceptable.
J Detected but below the Reporting Limit; therefore, result is
an estimated concentration (CLP J-Flag).
Sample results reported on a dry weight basis (if indicated in
units column)
Relative Percent DifferenceRPD
dry
Not ReportedNR
Analyte NOT DETECTED at or above the reporting limit (or method
detection limit when specified)ND
MDL Method detection limit (indicated per client's request)
The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in
accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical
report must be reproduced in its entirety.
Page 31 of 31
EnviroMatrix Analytical, Inc.