Securing land rights in post-conflict settings: experience from Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo Oumar Sylla, Chief Technical Advisor, Land and Property Program in Eastern DR Congo Remy Sietchiping Deputy Chief Land, Tenure and Property Administration Section UNHABITAT WORLD BANK ANNUAL WORKSHOP ON LAND AND POVERTY 23 rd to 26 th of April 2012 washington
17
Embed
Securing land rights in post-conflict settings: experience ... · Securing land rights in post-conflict settings: experience from Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo Oumar Sylla,
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Securing land rights in post-conflict settings: experience from Eastern Democratic
Republic of Congo
Oumar Sylla,
Chief Technical Advisor, Land and Property Program in Eastern DR Congo
Remy Sietchiping
Deputy Chief Land, Tenure and Property Administration Section
UNHABITAT
WORLD BANK ANNUAL WORKSHOP ON LAND AND POVERTY
23rd to 26th of April 2012
washington
I. Key Findings • Mediation is a sound way for addressing long standing grievances.
• Mediation is able to address complex land disputes (ethnic, concessionaries, communitarian).
• Working with ‘champions’ and the importance of community empowerment.
• A way of protecting women’s right to land in traditional context.
• Paper is not the absolute means for securing land rights in post-conflict.
• Fostering land disputes resolution with livelihood activities.
• As a continued process, securing community land rights requires follow up mechanisms.
II. Overview of Key land tenure insecurity factors
• Claims resulting from protracted displacement (adverse possession, ethnic division).
• Conflict between statutory and customary land laws (land laws of 1973, prevalence of land customary tenure).
• Demographic pressure and mounting competition to access to land ( park and reserve, insecurity in various areas).
• Lack of efficiency of the land administration ( non respect of procedures of land allocation, non respect of principles of good governance).
• Unclear procedures for reallocating land concessions (advantages for elites and businessman/ mounting sharecropping practices).
• Involvement of military and army groups in land competition (land grabbing, ethnic manipulation, claims of land rights using forces).
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Population
locale
Rapatriés Déplacés Retournés Autres
38.99
8.05
45.45
7
0.51 Fig 1: # of disputes registered: 2009-11
Fig 2: Categories involved on land disputes
III. Why the formal land title system is not relevant in the post-conflict context?
• Title does not apply to disputed land (return areas, concessions).
• High cost for land titling in vulnerable context ( 1Ha> 800-1000 USD)
• Prevalence of customary practices (failure of program promoting formal titles).
• Disappearance of land records.
• Protracted displacements.
• Land titling may create disequilibrium and exclusion for a large majority (Practices by Humanitarians: securing one part and exposing another).
IV. How tenure insecurity should be addressed in Post-conflict settings?
Consider the political and institutional context
State failure
Gap between land administration and administrated
Absence of Judicial system at the community level
Erosion of traditional authorities
Frequent land disputes
2. Clarify land rights by addressing land disputes
• Set up land disputes resolution mechanisms.
• Build capacity in Alternative disputes resolution mechanisms for local institutions.
• Support to the Ituri Land Commission in dealing with land disputes.
Facts and figures on land disputes resolution
• Establish a typology of land disputes
• Develop a deep understanding of land tenure issues
• Involve community members in the process for solving their disputes
• Develop system of recording land mediation outcomes
# of Land disputes Resolved from October 2009- March 2012
Impact of mediation outcomes
3. From mediation to securing land rights through alternative mechanisms