Comparison of Liquor Licence in Kerala and Tamilnadu SUBMITTED TO NCHMCT CENTRE: IHM GWALIOR
Dec 26, 2015
Comparison of Liquor Licence in
Kerala and Tamilnadu
SUBMITTED TO NCHMCTCENTRE: IHM GWALIOR
SUBMITTED BY:-
CONTENTS
CHAPTER PARTICULARS
GUIDE’ S NOTE
CERTIFICATE
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
OBJECTIVES
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
LIMITATION
CHAPTER II
THEOROTICAL FRAMEWORK
CHAPTER III
DATA ANALYSIS
CHAPTER IV
STUDY
CONCLUSION
SUGGESTION
BIBLIOGRAPHY
QUESTIONER
CERTIFICATE
This is to Certify that _________________Student of BHM
Final Year Batch has Completed his project work on
____________________________ during the year 2010-
2011.
GUIDE NOTE
I am Pleased to Mention that _______________ Student of
JPIHM, Meerut , has successfully Completed his project
work on ___________________________ under my
supervision during the year 2007-2008.
Project Coordinator
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The study was conducted by the assistant of several
individuals. I really appreciate their help and hereby thank
them. I would like to give special thanks to the following
people:
Firstly, I would like to thank _____________________ who had
supervised the study and was in charge of the entire
project. His presence and assistant was remarkable and
so I am grateful to him.
Secondly, I would like to thank the hotel officials who were
interviewed. They took out time from their busy schedules
to help me proceed with my study. Their assistance was
very significant and so I am grateful to them as well.
Thirdly, I would like to thank all other people who provided
me with the resources to conduct my study. Their help
and assistance was very valuable and so I would like to
acknowledge them as well.
Overall all the above mentioned people had a great role in
my study. Their direct and indirect help indeed proved to
be help.
Thank you
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
OBJECTIVES
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
LIMITATION
INTRODUCTION
Liquor is a liquid intoxicant, deriving its intoxicating potency
from the ethyl alcohol in it. Liquor can be divided into three
broad categories, namely Indian Made Foreign Liquor (IMFL),
Beer and Country Liquor. Hard liquors broadly have an
alcohol content of and above 20% and denote Whisky, Rum,
Brandy, the white spirits like Gin and Vodka and also include
Country Liquor. Soft liquors have a range of 4-20% of alcohol
and include Beer, Cidar, Wines and Liqueurs.
Liquor making starts with the process of fermentation,
followed by brewing or distillation, latter in case of hard
liquors. Raw material for fermentation usually differs from
liquor to liquor and is corn or malt in case of Whisky,
molasses in case of Rum and Country liquor, grapes in case
of Brandies and Wines, any starchy substance for Gin and
Vodka and barley for Beer. The raw material can differ also
depending upon the availability or abundance in that area.
Eventually it is the flavour that marks the liquor for its
variety as well as quality.
In Indian markets most prominent segment of liquor
consumed by the middle classes, is the Indian Made Foreign
Liquor, which covers most liquor, barring beer and country
liquor, and is available in glass or sometimes plastic bottles.
Beer is also available in glasses filled through dedicated taps
dispensing what is known as draught beer. Most Indian beer
is Lager that is it can be stored for some time. and all of
them use a herb, known as hops, for flavouring. Liquors from
which sugar content has been chemically reduced are
termed as "dry". Country Liquor is generally in the range of
25% of alcohol and also available in glass bottles only. Wines
in India are available in red or white variety, with pink almost
non existing. Champagne, generally a ceremonial drink, also
known as sparking wine, is generally off-white and is fizzy
because of its carbonation at the time of bottling. Liqueurs
are concentrated syrups, available in myriad flavours, and
are usually taken without dilution after major meals.
OBJECTIVE
To Study the Comparison of Liquor Licence in Kerala
and Tamilnadu.
To Study the Details of Liquor Licence.
To Study the Do’s & Don’t’s of Liquor Licence.
METHODOLOGY
The aspects which call on for designing a research plan helps
us in making decisions on the following things: a)
Date Sources
Research Instruments
Sampling Plant
Contact Methods
Data Sources:
Date were of two types:
Primary - The date was collected after interviewing the
guests who were staying in the hotel. This was done with the
help of a questionnaire and a verbal interview.
Secondary - The data was collected from Hotel Journals,
periodicals and books. Both the sources were used in
completion of this project.
LIMITATIONS
This study has been undertaken under various limitations
and this must be kept in consideration while studying the
conclusions and recommendations of the same. The
limitations involved were mainly:
Time Factor
The time devoted for the research was limited because of
continuous classes in the Institute and also because of
preparation for the job interviews along side. Also, banquet
staff of 5 star hotels did not have much time to spare.
Centre of study
The study was to focus on the banquet survey of few hotels
only. The questionnaire prepared was also suiting to the five
star hotels.
CHAPTER II
THEOROTICAL FRAMEWORK
INDIAN LIQUOR
The liquor consumption in small doses in cold places may be
necessary to warm up the body provided quality of liquor is
taken care of. But for most of the regions of India and other
tropical countries, its effects are surely damaging to the
mental faculties. In the beginning, the ill-effect is temporary
but with repeated consumptions, it takers deep roots
blocking thinking faculty of the consumer, wherein he/she
starts demanding more and more of the liquor and gets
mentally drowned in its evil effects.
Indian society, in general, lacks discipline in the name of
enjoying freedom and this adds to unruly behavior of the
consumer sometimes unintentionally but most of the times
intentionally to display courage and wildness of the
character. About 50 percent of male Indian adults are taking
liquors regularly and more are willing to get it but restrained
by their economic conditions.
INTRODUCTION
orm Details of Licences
I -- Indian Made Foreign Liquor
L-1 Wholesale licensee of Indian Made Foreign Liquor
L-2 Retail vend of Indian Made Foreign Liquor/Beer.
L-3 Service of liquor in a hotel (to the residents in their
rooms).
L-4 It is granted to independent restaurants for service of
liquor.
L-5 Service of liquor in a bar/restaurant attached to a
hotel.
L-5A Retail vend of foreign liquor in a bar/dining car in a
luxury train.
L-6 Retail vend of Indian Made Foreign Liquor in duty free
shop.
L-6A Retail vend of foreign liquor in duty free shops off the
premises.
L-7 Retail vend of Indian Made Foreign Liquor in a military
canteen.
II - Country Liquor
L-9 Wholesale licensee of country liquor.
L-10 Retail vend of country liquor and 50 degree under
proof rum for consumption "off" the premises.
III - Denatured & Special Denatured Spirit
L-11 Wholesale and/ or retails vend of denatured spirit to
public only.
L-12 Wholesale vend of denatured spirit to trade only.
L-13 Bonded warehouse licence for import and storage in
bond of denatured spirit for wholesale to trade only.
L-14 Bonded warehouse licence for import and storage of in
bond of special denatured spirit.
IV - Rectified Spirit
L-15 Retail vend of rectified spirit to public only.
L-16 Wholesale vend of rectified spirit to trade only.
L-17 Bonded warehouse licence for import in bond and
storage of rectified spirit for wholesale to trade only.
V – Special
L-18 Extension of hours during which sale is permitted.
L-19 Retail vend of foreign liquor at a club (bonafide or
proprietary).
L-
19A
for service of liquor in bars/restaurants in a club whose
membership is restricted to Govt.servants only
L-20 temporary arrangements for service of liquor are
required inside the licensed premises of L-3, L-4, L-5,
L-19 and L-19 A
L-49 Permits for possessing more than the individual
possession limit approved
L- Service of liquor in a party hosted anywhere in Delhi
49A
L-52 Private owned retail liquor vends
L-53 license for retail sale of beer and mixed alcoholic
beverages in departmental stores
SOME FACTS ABOUT LIQUOR
Do's & Don't As a part of its policy to provide safe and
quality liquor to the consumers in Delhi, the Excise
Department has formulated the following do's & don't which
they follow very strictly in regulating and controlling the sale
of liquor in the NCT of Delhi.
Licence cannot be granted to a person who is not
assessed to income tax.
No licensee shall employ any person suffering from an
infectious or contagious disease.
The business premises of a licensee shall be kept
closed on dry days applicable on him.
The hours for the sale of liquor shall be such as may be
specified in an order by the Excise Commissioner.
The licensee shall prominently display in front of his
shop a signboard showing the retail price of each
brand of liquor to be charged by him.
Always buy liquor from authorized liquor shop.
The consumers while buying liquor from authorized
liquor shop must ensure that the bottle is marked “for
sale in Delhi only.”
The liquor from army canteen is meant only for army
personnel and not for general public
No individual should possess liquor at one time more
than the prescribed limit without special permit.
Always check seal of the bottle and insist on cash
memo while buying liquor from the shop.
Do not pay more than MRP printed on the bottle.
If one is traveling to Delhi from outside state, one
should not possess more than one unsealed liquor
bottle of 750 ml.
Do not service liquor at unlicensed premises.
Do not buy liquor from illegal sources.
Do not buy if you are below 25 years of age.
No person is eligible for grant of license if he has been
declared insolvent by any court of Delhi or who is
declared insane or who is below 25 years of age or is
convict declared by any court for any non-bailable
offence.
No person shall permit or publish in any
newspaper/book/leaflet matter soliciting the use of or
offering any liquor.
No person shall have in his possession any quantity of
any intoxicant, knowing the same to have been
unlawfully imported, transported, manufactured,
cultivated /collected or knowing prescribed duty not to
have been paid thereon.
No person should be employed at any licensed
premises either with or without remuneration any
male under the age of 25 years or any female in part
of such premises in which liquor or intoxicating drug is
consumed by the public.
Consumption and service of liquor at public places is
completely banned.
Consumption of liquor is injurious to health.
Liquor Licence in Kerala
Following protests from anti-liquor campaign
activists, Kerala Excise Minister K. Babu made
modifications in the liquor policy that now
empowers local bodies to give sanction for new
bars, liquor outlets and toddy shops. Speaking to
reporters on Thursday, Babu said the
government order to this effect has now come
out.
"Soon after we announced the liquor policy a
few months back, it had evoked strong protests
from a section of political leaders and also
Christian bishops. Taking that into consideration,
we decided to empower the local bodies in the
state to decide if a new licence is to be given,"
said Babu.
Incidentally it was CPM leader, and then Finance
Minister, K. Sivadasa Menon under the chief
ministership of E.K. Nayanar (1996-2001) who
revoked the rule empowering the local bodies
and brought it under the Excise department
which gave new licences for bars, liquor retail
outlets and toddy shops.
"The cabinet will now decide if an ordinance to
this effect be promulgated or wait till the next
session of the assembly for this to become a
law. If it is an ordinance it would take only a few
days," said a top government official on
condition of anonymity to IANS.
Kerala today has 708 bar hotels, 383 retail
outlets (all owned by the state government) and
around 4,000 functional toddy shops in the
state.
A furore was created by anti-liquor activists that
the Oommen Chandy government is out to
sanction any number of bar-attached hotels
coming under the category of three-star hotels
in the name of promoting tourism.
"In fact, this was wrongly interpreted by the
anti-liquor activists because what we intended
was that after this fiscal we would not give
licences to any bar-attached three-star hotels. At
the end of the next fiscal no four-star hotel with
bars would be given and by 2014 only five-star
hotels would get a bar licence," said the official.
Anti-liquor activists are up in arms because in
the last fiscal liquor sales touched a new high
when it reached Rs.6,730.30 crore, up from
Rs.5,539.85 crore in 2009-10. Liquor sales
provide precious revenue for the state
government up from Rs.4,260 crore (2009-10) to
Rs.5,239 crore in the last fiscal.
Excise Commissioner
History
Excise Department is one of the oldest Departments in the
State, and it contributes a major share of the State Revenue.
The word ABKARI derived from Persian (abkara from kar-
business) strengers Persian English Dictionary defines it as
tax on the manufacture and sale of Spirituous liquors and
intoxicating drugs. According to the glossary of judicial and
revenue terms it means revenue derived from duties levied
on the manufacture and sale intoxicating drugs whether in
substance, infusion, extract as opium, charas, etc.
After the formation of the State of Kerala, it was noticed that
different Abkari Acts were in force in different parts of the
State, namely; Travancore Abkari Act for Travancore, Cochin
Abkari Act for Cochin, Madras Abkari Act for Malabar.
Existence of the different Acts created much practical
difficulties and a unified Act for the whole of the state
became necessary. Therefore Government decided to extent
the Cochin Abkari Act for the whole of the state with
necessary amendments. The Cochin Abkari Act I of 1077
was renamed as the Abkari Act I of 1077 and was extended
to the whole of the state with effect from 11.05.1967.
Various amendments were made in the Abkari Act from time
to time.
The original Act viz., the Cochin Abkari Act was passed by
His Highness the Maharaja of Cochin on the 5th day of August
1902, corresponding to 31st day of Karkadagom 1077.
Excise Department was functioning under the Board of
Revenue till 30.6.98. Excise Commissioner is the
administrative head.
Vision and Mission of the Department
The Department is administering laws related to Liquor,
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances, Medicinal
Preparations containing alcohol and narcotic drugs, etc.
The Acts enforced by Excise Department are [1]. The Abkari
Act 1 of 1077, [2]. The Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic
Substances Act 1985, [3]. The Medicinal and Toilet
Preparations (Excise Duties) Act, 1955 [4]. The Spirituous
Preparations (Inter State Trade and Commerce) Control Act
1955., and [5]. The Prohibition Act 1950 (Sections 1, 7 & 11
only). The NDPS Act and the M&T.P Act were enacted by the
Central Government.
The various rules formulated under the Abkari Act, NDPS Act,
M & TP Act are furnished below:
1. Abkari Shops (Disposal) Rules 2002.
2. Kerala Foreign Liquor Rules 1953.
3. The Kerala Liquor Transit Rule 1975.
1. The Kerala Foreign Liquor (Compounding, Blending
and Bottling) Rules 1975.
4. Abkari Shops Departmental Management Rules 1972.
5. Kerala Rectified Spirits Rule 1972.
6. Kerala Winery Rules 1970
7. The Kerala Distillery & Warehouse Rules 1968.
8. The Kerala Spirituous Preparation Control Rules 1969.
9. The Brewery Rule 1967.
10. Cochin Denatured Spirit & Methyl Alcohol Rules 1965.
11. Varnish Rules 1965.
12. Foreign Liquor (Storage in Bond) Rules 1961.
13. Tree Tax Rules 1959.
1. Kerala Abkari (Disposal of Confiscated Articles )
Rules 1996.
2. Medicinal and Toilet Preparation (Excise Duties)
Rules 1956.
3. Kerala Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic
Substances Rules 1985.
The principal duties of the Department are protection,
augmentation and collection of Excise Revenue and
enforcement of the above acts and various Rules made there
under. The Department prevents leakage of revenue, and
exerts effective control on the abuse of liquor and
Intoxicating Drugs. The duties of Excise Department are
broadly classified as Collection of Revenue, Enforcement
activity to prevent illicit liquor production, sale and
trafficking and Campaign against Alcoholism.
Liquor includes spirits of wine, arrack, spirits, wine, toddy,
beer and all liquid consisting of or containing alcohol.
Individual has no fundamental right over the manufacture
and trade of liquor. Absolute right on liquor is vested with
the State. Government formulates Abkari policy of the state
every year. The policy formulated by the State Government
is implemented by the Excise Department.
Organizational Structure
For the convenience of administration, the State of Kerala is
divided into three Zones headed by Joint Excise
Commissioners.
1. South Zone with head quarters at Thiruvananthapuram
2. Central Zone with head quarters at Ernakulam and
3. North Zone with head quarters at Kozhikode.
Fourteen Excise Divisions come under the above three Zones
which are co-terminus to the 14 Revenue Districts of the
State, headed by Deputy Excise Commissioners. In each
Division there is an Asst. Excise Commissioner for
supervision of enforcement activities. Each Division is
further divided into Excise Circles, which are co-terminus to
the Revenue Taluk of the State under the control of Circle
Inspectors of Excise. Each Circle comprises of one or more
Excise Ranges, which are the micro level unit of Excise
Department and the primary enforcement unit headed by
Excise Inspectors.
To assist the Excise Commissioner in the administrative
work, there is an Additional Excise Commissioner
(Administration) an officer of IAS Rank in the
Commissionerate of Excise. In the Enforcement matters, an
Additional Excise Commissioner( Enforcement), IPS officer
of IGP Rank is appointed for assisting the Excise
Commissioner.
Each Excise Zone is under the control of a Joint Excise
Commissioner and each Excise Division under the control of
a Deputy Excise Commissioner. The Excise Circle Offices in
each Taluk are under the control of a Circle Inspector of
Excise and each Range under an Excise Inspector. In each
district, in addition to the Excise Circle Offices and Range
Offices, there is an Excise Enforcement and Anti Narcotic
Special Squad under the control of Circle Inspector of
Excise. The Jurisdiction of these Squads is within the entire
District. One Narcotic Enforcement Squad is functioning at
Adimali in Idukki District exclusively formulated for the
eradication of Ganja Cultivation and prevention of Narcotic
offences. The department has an Excise Intelligence and
Investigation Bureau under the control of a Joint Excise
Commissioner for collection of intelligence. Under the Joint
Excise Commissioner, Intelligence, there are three Asst.
Excise Commissioner at Zonal level. There is one Excise
Vigilance Wing headed by a Police Officer in the rank of
Superintend of Police, under the control of excise
Commissioner, functioning at Excise Quarters. Excise
Department has a State Excise Academy and Research
Centre for imparting training to the officers and men of the
department. The Principal of the Academy is an officer in
the rank of Joint Excise Commissioner.
Awareness programmes against drug abuse and
alcoholism.
1. Posters containing messages of drug abuse and anti
alcoholism, flex boards, banners, leaflets etc., are being
exhibited and circulated.
2. Light dramas, street plays, steet procession etc are being
conducted.
3. Seminars and public meeting are being conducted with
the active co-operation of political workers, social workers
and other Local Self Government Departments in the
selected places / centres.
4. With the active co-operation of the Educational
Institutions, seminars, slide shows, essay competition,
drawing competition etc are being conducted and experts
such as psychologists, doctors, social workers, are taking
awareness classes for the students of High Schools and
Colleges.
5. Magic Programmes under the leadership of Prof: Gopinath
Muthukad are being conducted at the selected centres to
show the bad impact of drug abuse and alcoholism.
6. Steps are being taken to telecast a docufiction under the
titles ‘Zpc´elcn’ through the visual medias.
7. A master plan in its final stage for commencing campaign
against alcoholism from October 2010 onwards throughout
the state.
8. Project reports are being received from Health
Department for commencing de-addiction centres in Kollam,
Pathanamthitta, Idukki, Malappuram, Wayanad, Kannur,
Kasaragod and Palakkad district Hospitals with the support
of Excise Department.
1.Time for grant of various licences, permits, NOCs: -
We promise to give the final response to all the applicable within the time provided below:-
NAME OF LICENSE /
PERMIT
LICENSING / PERMIT
GIVING AUTHORITY
PERIOD IN WHICH LICENSE ISSUED (OR REJECTION COMMUNICATED)
Issue of NOC for import / export of spirit etc.
Excise Commissioner 2 weeks
Label Registration requests Excise Commissioner 2 weeks
Brand Registration Excise Commissioner 2 weeks
Permit for import of narcotic drug
Excise Commissioner 2 weeks
Request for FL-3 licence Government /Excise Commissioner
1 Month
Renewal of FL-3 Licence Deputy Excise Commissioner 2 Weeks
Request for other licenses Excise Commissioner 1 Month
L1, L2 etc. Excise Commissioner 1 Month
Permission for alternation, renovation of licensed premises
Excise Commissioner 1 Month
Permits from KSBC Warehouses
AEC(KSBC) 3 days (with FCFS)
Excise Verification Cerficate Circle Inspector of
Excise FL-9 Shop
On the same day of presentation of consignment.
Other Export / Import, transit permits
Deputy Commissioner of Excise of the Division
3 days
Licence for toddy Deputy Commissioner of Excise of the Division
10 days
Toddy Transport permit Deputy Commissioner of Excise of the Division
10 days
Interdivision permit Deputy Commissioner of Excise of the Division
10 days
Within Division Deputy Commissioner of Excise of the Division
7 days
Tree marking requests 15 days
Confirmation of toddy licence Excise Commissioner 7 days
2. Complaint’s follow up: -
The following time schedule wille kept for registration of complaints and follow up action on complaints:-
Sl.No Action By whom Within what time
1 Acknowledgement of the complaint on demand
By the recipient The same day
2 Forwarding for action to the concerned field officer
The recipient officer With in 24 hours
3 Inquiry, action and report back The field officer Within 3 weeks
4 Communication of action taken if asked for
The recipient officer Within 1 week
3. Follow-up of Abkari Cases
Sl.No Action By whom Within what time
1 Registration of case Circle Inspector/Excise Inspector
At the earliest and not later than 24 hours
2 Production of thondy articles/accused before a magistrate
Circle Inspector/Excise Inspector
Earliest but not later than 24 hours of arrest/seizure
3 Ensuing that thondy articles are sent by the last for the chemical examiners report
Circle Inspector/Excise Inspector
Within 7 days
4.Disposal of Seized Vehicles
Sl.No Action By whom Within what time
1 Publication of disposal notice and conduct of auction after confiscation
Dy. Commissioner of Excise
One month
2 Confirmation of sale Excise Commissioner 15 days
3 Disposal of vehicle to the auction purchaser
Excise Inspector /
Circle Inspector of Excise
One month from the date of auction.
4. Notice to the RC Owner, hearing,examination of witnesses / publication of Notice in newspapers in case of no RC Owner is found
Asst. Excise Commissioner (Authorised Officer)
Within 4 months from seizure
5 Completion of confiscation proceedings
Authorised Officer Within 5 months from seizure
6 Time for appeal before Addl. Commissioner / Confirmation by the Excise Commissioner.
One month from confiscation
7 Disposal of appeal by the Addl.
Commissioner
Addl. Excise
Commissioner
One month from the date of appeal
8 Time for filing revision One month
9 Disposal of Revision by the Excise Commissioner
Excise Commissioner One month from the date of revision
10 Publication of disposal notice and Conduct of Auction after proper publicity
Asst. Excise Commissioner
Two months
11 Confirmation of sale Excise Commissioner One month
12 Maximum time taken for disposal from the date of seizure
One year
5. Disposal of seized Spirit / IMFL/ Arrack:
Action By whom Time limit
1 Sending for Chemicals Examiner’s Report (from Court)
Excise Inspector of
the Range
Within a week of Seizure
2 Receipt of Chemical Examiner’s Report
Two months
3 Application for pretrial Disposal, if trial not completed of final orders not passed by the Court.
Within 6 months from the Date of seizure.
4 Obtain pretrial disposal sanction From the court.
Within 7months from the date of seizure.
5 Completion of confiscation Proceedings.
Authorised Officer Within 8 months from the date of seizure.
6 Proposal for disposal is to be Placed before the Disposal Committee
Asst. Excise Commissioner
Within 9 months
7 Disposal / Destroyal of the Confiscated thondy approved by the Disposal Committee as directed by the Committee.
Within One month of the a approval by the Disposal Committee.
8 Maximum total time taken for disposal.
12 Months (1 Year)
6. Redressal of Complaints against delay or non-performance:-
1. Except in cases where there is already a provision in law for appeal / revision, complaint about unlawful denial or delay in the grant of any of the permits / license or in the sending of reports by any of the officers other than the Excise Commissioner can be filed before the Excise Commissioner. The Excise Commissioner will take action on such complaints within a week and inform the complainant about the action taken within a fortnight.
2. Complaint about any such delay against the Excise Commissioner can be filed
before the Excise Minister.
Local bodies to get powers to licence liquor shops
The Excise Department has decided to restore the powers of
local self governments to licence and regulate abkari shops
in their jurisdiction.
Excise Minister K. Babu issued orders last night to initiate
steps to restore the powers. The measure will require
amendments to the Panchayat Raj Act and Municipalities
Act.
When the laws were enacted in 1994, the local self
governments had been given powers to decide whether they
wanted to allow abkari shops in their area. However, this
was subsequently withdrawn on the ground that such
jurisdictions would come in conflict with the abkari policy of
the government.
The sub-committee of the ruling United Democratic Front,
which critically examined the current excise policy of the
government, had recommended that the powers originally
granted to the local self governments should be restored.
As administrative department, the Excise Department issued
orders to give effect to the recommendations. However, the
matter would now have to go through the legislative
process. The government has not yet decided whether to
give effect to decision through an Ordinance or through
enactment of legislation in the Assembly.
CHURCH OPPOSES KERALA’S NEW LIQUOR POLICY
Church leaders today said the government should restrict
new licenses for alcohol sales and stop a brewer from
opening more outlets in Kerala.
A political sub-committee met at Thiruvananthapuram.
“We have considered all views regarding the liquor policy
and decided to restrict issuing new licenses to hotel
bars,”said M.M. Hasan, a senior Congress leader who heads
the committee.
The Church is worried about the Kerala government’s draft
liquor policy, which would make alcohol “freely available”.
The policy proposes that three-star hotels could have a bar
license and would relax a ban on sales within 200 meters of
places of worship, educational institutions and hospitals.
The Church has been campaigning for a liquor-free Kerala.
But adoption of the new policy would “foil our attempts and
drive the youth to alcoholism,” said Major Archbishop and
head of the Syro-Malabar Church George Alenchery.
Father Thaithottam, president of Kerala’s anti-liquor
committee, said the new policy runs counter to assurances
given by the ruling coalition and the chief minister.
“Alcoholism has destabilized families, leading to suicides,
high crime rates and road accidents,” he said.
Liquor Licence in
TAMILNADU
Alcohol policy in Tamil Nadu
From 2003 onwards, sale of alcoholic drinks in Tamil Nadu is
the monopoly of the state government. The agency in
charge is called Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation
Limited (Tasmac) and alcoholic drinks are sold exclusively
through Tasmac outlets (unless one goes to a licensed pub).
Having been to a few Tasmac outlets, I found them totally
disgusting. The floors were wet with liquor and God knows
what else. Men drinking inside and behaving in an uncivilised
manner. And the only liquors you get in TN now are those
made in TN. If you want beer, your choices are limited -
Kingfisher (thankfully), Haywards 5000, Vorion 6000,
Knockout - the latter three being beer beefed up with extra
alcohol, for a better "kick". And the kind of IMFL thats
available there is third rate, almost like arrack.
Forget wine or champagne that people up the social ladder
like to indulge in. While the Indian wine market is exploding,
and Indian brands like Grovers and Sula are getting
recognised abroad, it is acrying shame that one cannot get
them in TN. The only good wines available in TN are
imported ones at some star hotels for outrageous prices. And
for New Years which I celebrated in Chennai, I had to buy a
bottle of champagne from Bangalore and take it along with
me, since I knew I cannot buy one in TN! As a wine lover, this
is a strong reason for me to hate Chennai!
In Bangalore, you can buy good wine/spirits at outlets like
Food World. I know many women who buy alcohol and not
feel uncomfortable in doing so. However in TN, thanks to
Tasmac, a woman who enters a Tasmac outlet faces a real
danger of being molested, and has to depend on male
friends to buy her alcohol. I don't think any sane woman
would ever enter a Tasmac outlet.
In TN, the social atmosphere is such that people see drinking
as "evil", period. There is no concept of social drinking, or
drinking as a form of relaxation after a tiring working day. If
people drink, it is to get high and behave in a drunken
manner (as is evinced by the super potent beers like
Knockout).
And the politicians are eager to capitalise on this. Tasmac is
a cash cow. Even though it was formed during Jayalalitha's
govt, the present DMK govt has no inclination of
discontinuing its monopoly, since its a hen that lays golden
eggs.
But this kind of negative thinking and govt policy are bound
to take its toll. The IT industry has people with liberal
attitudes in general. Also women make a large portion of it.
This kind of women-unfriendly attitude is bound to make
them leave for other cities like Bangalore which offer a
better climate and choice of drinks for social drinking.
TN's liquor policy does not violate norms: HC
The Tamil Nadu Government's liquor policy does not violate
any statutory or Constitutional norms,'' the First Bench of
Madras High Court observed while granting liberty to a
Pattali Makkal Katchi(PMK)Office-Bearer to make fresh
representation to the government within two weeks
regarding the policy.
If such a representation is made, the Prohibition and Excise
Secretary should consider the same and dispose it of by a
reasoned order within six weeks thereafter.
The Bench comprising Chief Justice A K Ganguly and Justice F
M Ibrahim Kalifulla recorded the Government Pleader's
statement the government was already running 50 de-
addiction centres in the State and it was thinking of starting
similar facilities at more places in the near future.
The Bench disposed the writ petitions filed by Nirmala Raja,
State President of the Pattali Mahalir Sangam, the women's
wing of the PMK.
Ms Raja sought a writ directing the respondents ''Chief
Secretary, Prohibition and Excise Secretary and TASMAC,
represented by its Managing Director'' to desist from fixing
targets to increase the sale of alcohol and IMFL in the State.
She also sought a direction to the authorities to set up de-
addiction centres in every district and organise campaigns to
create awareness of the evils of drinking.
The petitioner's counsel submitted that in Gujarat prohibition
was being implemented. Such a principle could be followed
in Tamil Nadu.
The Government Pleader submitted the sales targets had
been framed by way of internal circulars which were issued
to the department concerned. They were never advertised or
brought to public knowledge. The sales targets had been
fixed primarily to eradicate consumption of illicit liquor and
augment public revenue.
The Bench said the matter involved was about framing of
policy by the State Government.
It was difficult for the court to interfere unless the liquor
policy was in clear violation of any statutory or Constitutional
norm.
''We cannot see the policy, which has been framed by the
State Government, violates any such norms.'' The petitioner
had submitted she had made a representation to the
authorities in March this year and it should be disposed of.
The Bench said the petitioner could make a fresh
representation along with a copy of the court order.
Government of Tamil Nadu
Abstract
Prohibition & Excise - Tamil Nadu Liquor (Retail Vending)
Rules, 1989 - Licensing of Indian Made Foreign Liquor retail
vending shops - Introduction of licensing system - Policy
approved- Orders issued.
PROHIBITION AND EXCISE (VI) DEPARTMENT
G.O.(Ms).No.
113 Dated:
22.6.2001
Read:
1.G.O.Ms.No.104, Prohibition and Excise, dated 17.5.2001.
2.G.O.Ms.No.109, Prohibition and Excise, dated 6.6.2001.
3. G.O.Ms.No.112, Prohibition and Excise, dated 20.6.2001.
-------
ORDER:
The Government have carefully examined the policy to be
adopted for licensing of the Indian Made Foreign Liquor retail
vending shops for the block period 2001-2004 and have
decided that a new licensing system should be followed for
the licensing of the Indian Made Foreign Liquor retail vending
shops for the block period 2001-2004.
2. The Government also direct that,
a) The number of Indian Made Foreign Liquor retail
vending shops for the entire State for the block period 2001-
2004 be fixed at 6000.
b) The privilege fee of the Indian Made Foreign Liquor
retail vending shops for the year 2001-2002 shall be worked
out on notified area basis, taking the average privilege fee of
the last three years and providing for some suitable
increase. There should be a uniform privilege fee for a given
notified area.
c) A notice inviting applications in a format to be
prescribed for the grant of licence for the year 2001-2002
should be published in the newspapers on 23.6.2001 and
24.6.2001 stipulating 28.6.2001 as the last date for receipt
of applications. In case there are more than one eligible
applications per shop, the selection shall be by drawal of lot
in the presence of the District Collectors and licences shall
be issued thereafter. The District Collectors are instructed to
grant licences on or before 10.7.2001. The shops should
start functioning from 16.7.2001.
d) The licensee should lift the minimum off-take fixed for
the shop by the licensing authority. In case of failure to lift
the minimum off-take consecutively for two months, the
licensee will be liable to pay a penalty in proportion to the
loss of revenue due to non-lifting of stock and if there is
default for a period of another two months consecutively, the
licence will be liable to be cancelled. Necessary
amendments to the Tamil Nadu Liquor (Retail Vending )
Rules, 1989 will be issued separately in this regard.
3. The Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise and the
Collectors are requested to take immediate action to
implement the orders contained in the paragraph 2 above.
(BY ORDER OF THE GOVERNOR)
B.K. PRASAD,
SECRETAR
Y TO GOVERNMENT,
To
The Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise, Chennai-5.
All Collectors.
Copy to:
The Director General of Police, Chennai-4.
The Inspector General of Police(E), Chennai-5.
The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Marketing
Corporation Limited, Chennai-8.
The Finance Department, Chennai-9.
The Secretary to Honourable Chief Minister, Chennai-9.
The Senior P.A. to Honourable Minister (Revenue), Chennai-
9.
The office of the Honourable Chief Minister, Chennai-9.
The Secretariat Library, Chennai-9.
Liquor policy does not violate any statutory norm:
court
While stating that the Tamil Nadu government’s liquor policy
does not violate any statutory or constitutional norm, the
First Bench of the Madras High Court has granted liberty to a
PMK office-bearer to make a fresh representation to the
government within two weeks regarding the policy.
If such a representation is made, the Prohibition and Excise
Secretary should consider the same and dispose it of by a
reasoned order within six weeks thereafter.
The Bench, comprising Chief Justice A.K. Ganguly and Justice
F.M. Ibrahim Kalifulla, recorded the Government Pleader’s
statement that the government was already running 50 de-
addiction centres in the State and it was thinking of starting
the facility at more places in the near future.
The Bench disposed of writ petitions filed by Nirmala Raja,
State president of the Pattali Mahalir Sangam, the women’s
wing of PMK. Ms. Raja sought a writ directing the
respondents – Chief Secretary, Prohibition and Excise
Secretary and TASMAC, represented by its Managing
Director – to desist from fixing targets to increase the sale of
alcohol and IMFL in the State. She also sought a direction to
the authorities to set up de-addiction centres in every district
and organise campaigns to create awareness of the evils of
drinking.
Petitioner’s counsel submitted that in Gujarat prohibition was
being implemented. Such a principle could be followed in
Tamil Nadu.
The Government Pleader submitted the sales targets had
been framed by way of internal circulars, which were issued
to the department concerned. They were never advertised or
brought to public knowledge. The sales targets had been
fixed primarily to eradicate consumption of illicit liquor and
augment public revenue.
The Bench said the matter involved was about framing of
policy by the State government. It was difficult for the court
to interfere unless the liquor policy was in clear violation of
any statutory or constitutional norm. “We cannot see that
the policy, which has been framed by the State government,
violates any such norm.”
The petitioner had said that she had made a representation
to the authorities in March this year and it should be
disposed of.
The Bench said the petitioner could make a fresh
representation along with a copy of the court order.
CHAPTER III
DATA ANALYSIS
CHAPTER IV
CONCLUSION
BIBLIOGRAPHY
QUESTIONER
CONCLUSION
The L-1 licences are given to a company, society, or
manufacturing firm: partnership or proprietorship firm
provided the applicant owns a distillery. The applications for
this are invited through advertisements in leading
newspapers. The prime job of L-1 license holders is to supply
liquor to other license holders.
A number of certificates need to be submitted along with an
L-1 license application. These are listed below:
Solvency certificate from SMD
Income tax clearance certificate
No dues certificate from collector (excise)
No dues certificate from sales tax officer
Declaration of distillery on affidavit regarding sale and
minimum ex-distillery prices and distance of distillery
from Delhi
CA certificate for sale and minimum ex-distillery prices
Certificate from Excise authority regarding sale figures
Registered partnership deed/memorandum and article
of association
Duly audited annual account and balance sheet of
distillery
Attested copy of the license for establishment of
distillery/winery/bottling unit/brewery
Power of attorney
Attested photocopies of export passes/EVCs verifying
the sale figures of the whisky and rum brand for which
distillery has applied
Trade Mark Certificate (TMC)
Usership agreement under Trade & merchandise Marks
Act, 1958
Certificate from a government authorised laboratory or
other reputed private institution regarding quality of
brand.
An affidavit stating that there is nothing adverse or
against the applicant in view of the provision of rule 7
of Delhi Intoxicants license and sale rule, 1976
Documentary evidence to prove that the alcohol is
manufactured from natural alcohol (double distilled)
Extra natural alcohol
The IMFL or the beer brand proposed to be sold by the
applicant of the L-1 license should be owned by the distillery
and in respect of the IMFL brands, excluding wine, the
applicant should be in possession of trade mark certificate in
respect to these brands. However if the brand has been
sold in Delhi before 1993-94 the TMC is not required.
For the approval of rum and whiskey brands, the
brand must have sold a minimum quantity in the all
India market excluding Delhi as indicated in the terms
and conditions.
Once the license is approved, the applicant has to submit
the following:
Registration of brands
Approval of bonded warehouse
Approval of label
Fixation of ex-distillery prices
Distilleries and breweries also have a bone of contention
with the liquor policy of the government. According to the
Constitution of India, under Article 47, it is the
"Duty of the state to raise the level of nutrition and
the standard of living and to improve public health--
the state shall regard the raising of the level of
nutrition and the standard of living of its people and
the improvement of public health as among its
primary duties and in particular, the state shall
endeavour to bring about prohibition of the
consumption except for medical purposes of
intoxicating drinks and drugs which are injurious to
health."
However experience of prohibition in other countries has
shown that the prohibition would be counter productive.
Therefore, the Delhi government grants a privilege to the
distilleries with regulations, without granting any right to
trade in liquor.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
INTERNET
o indianwine.com/cs/blogs/indian...liquor+policy/default.aspx
o www. indianalcoholpolicy .org/
o www.timesofindia.indiatimes.com
BOOKS
Wine & Beer
Magazine
First Step
Today’s Traveller
Outlook Traveller
Newspaper
The Times of India
Hindustan Times