Page 1
Draft Final Environmental Impact Report
Agriculture Promotion Project 2.2‐1
February 2017
ICF 0054.15
Section 2.2 Biological Resources
ThissectiondescribesthegeneralbiologicalconditionsintheCountyandpertinentregulationsthatgovernbiologicalresources,anddiscussesthepotentialforimpactsonbiologicalresourcesasaresultofprojectimplementation.
2.2.1 Existing Conditions
ThelandscapeoftheCountyisdiversewithbroad,flatvalleys;deepcanyons;perenniallyflowingrivers;intermittentandephemeraldrainages;moderatelyandsteeplyslopedterrain;flatmesas;rollingfoothills;andaseriesofcoastallagoons.TheCountyincludesvariedtopography;arangeofmicro‐climates,soils,andothernaturalfeatures;andnumeroushabitatsandspecies,manyofwhichareuniquetotheregion.Thedevelopmentofurban,rural,andagriculturalareas,aswellastheinfluxofinvasiveplantsandspecies,haveposedathreattotheconservationoftheCounty’snativehabitatandendemicspecies.
ThemajorityoftheprojectareaislocatedinthewesternportionoftheCounty,surroundingtheincorporatedareas.Theexistingconditionthroughoutmuchoftheprojectareaconsistsofestateresidentialandagriculturaluseslocatedinvalley,mesa,andfoothillterrain.Farthereast,thelandislessdeveloped,withthelargestdevelopedareaintheeasternportionoftheprojectareabeingthecommunityofBorregoSprings.TheareasthathavebeendevelopedintheeasternportionoftheCountyarepredominantlyrural,withlargelotsforresidential,agriculturalorrelateduses,andlimitedinfrastructureandserviceavailability.
2.2.1.1 Vegetation Communities
Forthepurposeofthisdocument,themultiplevegetationtypeswithintheprojectareahavebeencombinedintothreevegetationcommunitycategories,whicharedescribedbelow(seeFigure2.2‐1).
Scrub and Chaparral
Scrubandchaparralisoneofthemostwidespreadvegetationcommunitycategoriesintheprojectarea.Thisvegetationcommunitycategorycomprises42individualvegetationcommunities,suchascoastalscrub,Sonorandesertscrub,southernmixedchaparral,northernmixedchaparral,coastalsage–chaparralscrub,chamisechaparral,Diegancoastalsagescrub,andRiversidiansagescrub.Generaldescriptionsofthescrubandchaparralcommunitiesareprovidedbelow.
Scrub
DiegancoastalsagescrubisthedominanttypeofscrubcommunityintheCountyandprovideshabitatforthesensitivecoastalCaliforniagnatcatcher(Polioptilacalifornicacalifornica).ThereareseveraldifferenttypesofDiegancoastalsagescrubthroughouttheCounty,includingDiegancoastalscrub,Diegancoastalsagescrub(coastalform),Diegancoastalsagescrub(inlandform),andDiegancoastalscrub(Baccharis‐dominated).Diegancoastalsagescrubconsistspredominantlyoflow‐growing,aromatic,andgenerallysoft‐leavedshrubs.Diegancoastalsagescrubisanativeplantcommunitycharacterizedbysoft,low,aromatic,shrubsandsubshrubscharacteristicallydominated
Page 2
County of San Diego Section 2.2. Biological Resources
Draft Final Environmental Impact Report
Agriculture Promotion Project 2.2‐2
February 2017
ICF 0054.15
bydrought‐deciduousspecies.Thiscommunitytypicallyoccursonsiteswithlowmoistureavailability,suchasdryslopesandclay‐richsoilsthatareslowtoreleasestoredwater.TherepresentativespeciesinthishabitattypeareCaliforniasagebrush(Artemisiacalifornica),flat‐topped(California)buckwheat(Eriogonumfasciculatum),blacksage(Salviamellifera),saw‐toothgoldenbush(Hazardiasquarrosa),andlaurelsumac(Malosmalaurina)(Oberbaueretal.2008).
RiversideansagescrubhassimilarspeciesasDiegancoastalsagescrub,butitoccursmoreinlandinthenorthernpartoftheCountyandonsteepslopes,severelydrainedsoils,orclaysthatslowlyreleasestoredsoilsmoisture.Representativespeciesincludeseveraloftheshrubspecieslistedabove,aswellasfourwingsaltbrush(Atriplexcanescens),brittlebrush(Enceliafarinosa),deerweed(Acmisponglaber),andLord’scandle(Hesperoyuccawhipplei)(Oberbaueretal.2008).
CoastalCaliforniagnatcatcher,Californiatowhee(Melozonecrissalis),whitecrownedsparrow(Zonotrichialeucophrys),rufous‐crownedsparrow(Aimophilaruficeps),andCaliforniathrasher(Toxostomaredivivum)arerepresentativebirdsofthecoastalsagescrubcommunities.Orange‐throatedwhiptail(Aspidoscelishyperythra),SanDiegohornedlizard(Phrynosomablanvillii),SanDiegobandedgecko(Coleonyxvariegatusabbotti),desertcottontail(Sylvilagusaudubonii),anddeermouse(Peromyscusmaniculatus)alsousecoastalsagescrubhabitats.Coyotes(Canislatrans)arecommonpredatorsinthiscommunity,andmuledeer(Odocoileushemionus)areoccasionallyseen.(CountyofSanDiego2010a).
Chaparral
Therearemanytypesofchaparralcommunitieswithinthisclassification,includingsouthernmixedchaparral,northernmixedchaparral,chamisechaparral,redshankchaparral,montanechaparral,scruboakchaparral,andmaritimechaparral.Thechaparraltypeatanyonelocationisdeterminedbythedominantsoils,elevation,rainfall,andotherconditionssuchasslopeanderosionpotential.Althoughvariousformsofchaparralhavebeenlosttoagricultureandurbanization,chaparralstilloccursthroughoutthemesasandslopesofthecoastallowlandswithintheCounty.Chaparralisgenerallycomposedofhard‐stemmedshrubswithleatheryleavesthatavoiddesiccationduringthedryseason.Forexample,cismontanechaparralsarecharacterizedbylargeshrubspeciessuchasmanzanita(Arctostaphylosspp.),chamise(Adenostomafasciculatum),scruboak(QuercusdumosaorQ.berberidifolia),mountainmahogany(Cercocarpusbetuloides),andwildlilac(Ceanothusspp.).
Chaparralishometoawidevarietyofbirds.Spottedtowhee(Pipilomaculates),wrentit(Chamaeafasciatahenshawi),Bell’ssparrow(Artemisiospizabelli),andCaliforniathrasherarerepresentativebirdsofthechaparralcommunity.Anumberofreptilesalsoinhabitthiscommunity,includingthewesternwhiptail(Aspidoscelistigris),granitespinylizard(Sceloporusorcutti),SanDiegohornedlizard,andSouthernPacificrattlesnake(Crotalusoreganushelleri).Inrocky,boulder‐strewnterrainontheeasternsideofthemountains,barefootgecko(Coleonyxswitaki)andchuckwalla(Sauromalusater)liveinchaparral.Mammalsincludeanumberofspeciesofbats,deermice,pocketmice(Chaetodipusfallax),desertcottontail,coyote,bobcat(Lynxrufus),muledeer,andmountainlion(Pumaconcolor)(Oberbaueretal.2008).
Woodland
WoodlandsthroughouttheCountygenerallyincludeoakwoodland(blackoakwoodland,coastliveoakwoodland,andEngelmannoakwoodland),walnutwoodland,peninsularpinonandjuniperwoodland,peninsularpinonwoodland,peninsularjuniperwoodlandandscrub,elephanttreewoodland,andeucalyptuswoodland.Oakwoodlandsoccurinavarietyoflocationswheresoil
Page 3
52
54
56
76
67
94
79
905
78
75
8
805
163
5
15
JulianJulian
BorregoBorregoSpringsSpringsValleyValley
CenterCenterBonsallBonsall
HiddenHiddenMeadowsMeadowsTwinTwin
OaksOaks
CentralCentralMountainMountain CuyamacaCuyamaca
BaronaBarona
PinePineValleyValley
DescansoDescanso
AlpineAlpineMountainMountainEmpireEmpireCrest -Crest -
DehesaDehesaValleValle
De OroDe Oro
RainbowRainbow
Pala -Pala -PaumaPauma
DesertDesert
SanSanDieguitoDieguito
PalomarPalomarMountainMountain
JacumbaJacumbaBoulevardBoulevardLakeLake
Morena /Morena /CampoCampo
PotreroPotrero
TecateTecate
JamulJamul
OtayOtay
SweetwaterSweetwater
SpringSpringValleyValley
LakesideLakeside
NorthNorthCountyCountyMetroMetro
NorthNorthMountainMountain
RamonaRamona
FallbrookFallbrookPendletonPendleton- De Luz- De Luz
Figure 2.2-1Vegetation Communities and Land Cover Types
County of San Diego Agriculture Promotion Program
Source: Vegetation - SanGIS (2014); Background Files - SanGIS (2014), BLM (2015).
0 105
Miles
K:\Sa
n Dieg
o\proj
ects\
Coun
ty_of_
SanD
iego\0
0054
_15_
Ag_P
romoti
on\m
apdo
c\EIR
\Fig0
2_2_
1_Ve
gCom
m_La
ndCo
ver.m
xd D
ate: 3
/7/20
16 1
9542
Vegetation Communities/Land Cover TypesAgricultureBog and MarshDune CommunityForestGrasslands, Vernal Pools, Meadows, and Other Herb CommunitiesNon-Native Vegetation, Developed Areas, or Unvegetated HabitatRiparian and Bottomland HabitatScrub and ChaparralWoodland
Community/Subregional Planning AreasIncorporated Cities (Not a Part of Project)Tribal, Military, and State Parks (Not a Part of Project)FreewaysHighways
Page 5
County of San Diego Section 2.2. Biological Resources
Draft Final Environmental Impact Report
Agriculture Promotion Project 2.2‐3
February 2017
ICF 0054.15
conditionsaremoisterthanthesoilsthathostscrubandchaparralvegetation.Inthelowlands,theyaremostlyconfinedtostreamandcanyonbottoms,butinthefoothillsandmountainstheyoccurinareaswithgoodsoilonnorth‐andsouth‐facingslopes.Woodlandscreateanopencanopyandserveashabitatforbirdspeciessuchasoaktitmouse(Baeolophusinornatustranspositus),mountainchickadee(Poecilegambelibaileyae),Nuttall’swoodpecker(Picoidesnuttallii),northernflicker(Colaptesauratus),westernscrub‐jay(Aphelocomacalifornica),andavarietyofflycatchersandowls.Becauseoakwoodlandsoftenoccuraslinearfeaturesalongdrainages,themammalsthatinhabitthemareoftenthesameonesthatoccurinthesurroundingchaparralhabitat,includingcoyote,bobcat,spottedskunk(Spilogalegracilis),stripedskunk(Mephitismephitis),andseveralspeciesofbats.Shrewsandlong‐tailedweasels(Mustelafrenata)tendtopreferoakwoodlandareasthatprovidemoremoisture.
Grasslands, Meadows, Vernal Pools, and Other Herb Communities
Grasslands
GrasslandsinSanDiegoaregenerallydividedintotwotypes:nativeandnonnative.Nativegrasslandsarecomposedmostlyofnativeperennialgrassesandherbs,includingseveralspeciesofbunchgrasses(Stipaspp.),blue‐eyedgrass(Sisyrinchiumbellum),checker‐bloom(Sidalceamalviflorassp.sparsifolia),andgoldenstar(Bloomeriaspp.).NonnativegrasslandsconsistofnonnativeannualgrassspeciesthatoriginatedintheMediterraneanregionandsupportspeciessuchasfoxtailchess(Bromusmadritensisssp.rubens),ripgutgrass(Bromusdiandrus),wildoats(Avenaspp.),fescues(Festucaspp.),red‐stemfilaree(Erodiumcicutarium),mustards(Brassicaspp.),lupines(Lupinusspp.),andgoldfields(Lastheniaspp.).Duetourbanizationandagriculturalactivities,nonnativeannualgrasslandshavepredominantlyreplacednativegrasslandsandshrublands,includingcoastalsagescrubandchaparral.
Meadows and Seeps
Thisclassificationincludesmontanemeadows,alkalimeadowsandseeps,freshwaterseeps,andvernalpools.Naturallyoccurringmeadowsexistprimarilyinthemountainsandfoothillswheretheyforminareasoffinesiltysoilswithgroundwaterclosetothesurface.Foothillvalleys,suchasCampoValley,McCainValley,andtheareasurroundingLakeHenshaw,supportextensivemeadows.LagunaMeadowintheLagunaMountainsandtheareasurroundingCuyamacaLakeintheCuyamacaMountainsareexamplesofmontanemeadows.Montanemeadowsaredominatedbybunchgrasses(Agropyronspp.),sedges(Carexspp.),andspikesedges(Eleocharisspp.).Duringspring,theyaresomewhatboggyandmoist,andtheyremaingreenlongaftertheherbaceousvegetationoftheirsurroundingshasdried.Manyoftheplantsandanimalsofthedesertsrelyonwaterfrommountainrunoff,andfromsprings,seeps,meadows,marshes,andotherwetareasscatteredonthedesertfloorandthedesertslopesofthemountains.Densevegetationgenerallysurroundsthesewetareas,andthetemperatureisusuallycoolerthanthesurroundingaridlands,thusprovidingwildlifesomerespitefromthedrydesertsummerheat.
Vernal Pools
Vernalpoolsarefoundingrasslands,meadows,andopeningsincoastalsagescrub;theysitaboveclayorhardpansubsoils.Vernalpoolsfillduringwinterandspringrainsanddryduringtheearlysummer,whichhascauseduniqueassemblagesofplantandanimallifetohaveevolvedwiththiswettinganddryingregime.Plantandanimalspeciescanremaindormantinsoilsforyearsuntilthe
Page 6
County of San Diego Section 2.2. Biological Resources
Draft Final Environmental Impact Report
Agriculture Promotion Project 2.2‐4
February 2017
ICF 0054.15
rightconditionsarepresenttosupportthecompletionoftheirlifecycles.Fairyshrimp(Branchinectaspp.)hatchfromhardenedcyststhatprotecttheanimalduringthedryseasonandcompletetheirlifecycleswithinacoupleofweeks.Otherpondanimals,suchastadpolesandverysmallcrustaceans,hatchwhenthepoolsarefull.Plantspeciescharacteristicofvernalpoolsinclude,butarenotlimitedto,thewingedwaterstarwort(Callitrichemarginata),waterpygmyweed(Crassulaaquatica),annualhairgrass(Deschampsiadanthonioides),calicoflower(Downingiacuspidate),Californiawaterwort(Elatinecalifornica),pygmywillowherb(Epilobiumpygmaeum),Hoover’sbutton‐celery(Eryngiumaristulatum),Howell'squillwort(Isoeteshowellii),Orcutt’squillwort(Isoetesorcuttii),awl‐leaflilaea(Lilaeascilloides),hairywaterclover(Marsileavestita),alkalimallow(Malvellaleprosa),tinymousetail(Myosurusminimus),spreadingnavarretia(Navarretiafossalis),andCaliforniaOrcuttgrass(Orcuttiacalifornica).
Forests
Coniferousforestsgenerallyoccuraboveanelevationof3,500feetandextendacrossthemajormountainranges,includingthePalomar,Volcan,Hotsprings,Cuyamaca,andLagunaMountains.Conifersgenerallygrowinareasthatreceivemorethan20inchesofprecipitationeachyear,includingsomesnow.ConiferousforestsareidentifiedbythepresenceofoneoranumberofspeciesofpinesincludingCoulter(Pinuscoulteri),Jeffrey(P.jeffreyi),Pacificponderosa(P.ponderosa),andsugar(P.lambertiana).Thered‐barkedincensecedar(Calocedrusdecurrens)andtheChristmastree–likewhitefir(Abiesconcolor),commonlymixedwiththedeciduousCaliforniablackoak(Quercuskelloggii),canyonliveoak(Q.chrysolepis),andcoastliveoak(Q.agrifolia),alsocharacterizeconiferousforestsintheCounty.
CommonbirdsthatinhabitconiferousforestsincludeSteller’sjay(Cyanocittastelleri),Americanrobin(Turdusmigratorius),westernbluebird(Sialiamexicana),black‐headedgrosbeak(Pheucticusmelanocephalus),mountainchickadee,oaktitmouse(Baeolophusinornatus),andavarietyofflycatchers.Forestlandsprovideimportanthabitatformammals,includingsouthernmuledeer,bobcat,bat,androdentspecies.Reptilesinconiferousforestincluderingnecksnake(Diadophispunctatus),mountainswiftlizards,andmountainkingsnake(Lampropeltiszonata).Thebrightlycoloredlarge‐blotchedsalamander(Ensatinaklauberi)alsooccurswithinthishabitat.
Oakforestrepresentsacommunitythatisfoundnearorblendsinwithotherforestvegetation.Oakforestsconsistofsubstantialtreesgrowinginamannerthatproducesaclosedcanopyoftreecover,andischaracterizedbycoastliveoak,Californiablackoak,andcanyonliveoak.Inmanylocations,thesespeciesgrowintomassivetreesthatarehundredsofyearsold.Thishabitatisoftenfoundadjacenttoandintermixeswithconiferousforestandoakwoodlandvegetation.TheprimarylocationsforoakforestarethenorthernendofPalomarMountain,theslopesandcanyonsonHotSpringsMountain,andpartsoftheCuyamacaandLagunaMountainranges.Animalspeciesfoundinoakforestincludeacornwoodpeckers(Melanerpesformicivorus),westernbluebirds,plaintitmouse,andmountainchickadees.Westerngraysquirrels(Sciurusgriseus)andMerriam’schipmunks(Tamiasmerriami)arealsoknowntoinhabittheseforests,asaresouthernmuledeer,bobcats,coyotes,andmountainlions.
Riparian
Riparianvegetationcommunitiesincludesoutherncoastliveoakriparianforest,southerncottonwood–willowriparianforest,southernriparianscrub,southernsycamore–alderriparianwoodland,southernwillowscrub,desertdrywashwoodland,ColoradoDesertwashscrub,mulefatscrub,desertsinkscrub,Sonoranwashscrub,whitealderriparianforest,tamariskscrub,and
Page 7
County of San Diego Section 2.2. Biological Resources
Draft Final Environmental Impact Report
Agriculture Promotion Project 2.2‐5
February 2017
ICF 0054.15
southernarroyowillowriparianforest.Riparianvegetationoccursalongrivers,streams,andotherdrainagesintheCounty.Generallywillows(Salixspp.),cottonwoods(Populusspp.),sycamore(Platanusracemosa),ormulefat(Baccharissalicifolia)providethestructureoftheriparianhabitatsintheunincorporatedCounty.Oaks(QuercusagrifoliaandQ.engelmannii)arealsopresentinsomeriparianhabitats,suchassoutherncoastliveoakriparianforest(CountyofSanDiego2010a).
RiparianvegetationcommunitiesareoneofthemostsensitivehabitatsinCaliforniaandoneofthemostimportantvegetationcommunitiesforwildlife.ThefederallyendangeredleastBell’svireo(Vireobelliipusillus)andsouthernwillowflycatcher(Empidonaxtrailliiextimus),aswellasthemorecommonyellow‐breastedchat(Icteriavirens)andcommonyellowthroat(Geothlypistrichas),arecompletelydependentonriparianhabitats.Otherbirdspecies,suchastheAmericangoldfinch(Carduelistristis),yellowwarbler(Dendroicapetechia),andlong‐earedowl(Asiootus),alsofrequentriparianscrubsandwoodlands.Smallcarnivoresthatinhabitriparianvegetationincludespottedandstripedskunks,raccoons(Procyonlotor),andbobcats.Riparianvegetationandassociatedstreamcoursesarecriticalforavarietyofamphibians,includingthePacifictreefrog(Pseudacrisregilla)andthefederallyendangeredarroyosouthwesterntoad(Bufocalifornicus)thatinhabitthewateranddampbanksofwatercourses.Silveryleglesslizards(Anniellapulchrapulchra)liveintheleaflitter.Duringthedrysummermonths,speciesfromnearbyaridterrestrialhabitatsusetheriparianareasforrespitefromtheheat.RiparianvegetationinthedesertregionincludesunusuallylargemesquitebosqueforestsinBorregoValleyneartheBorregoSink.Mesquitebosquesaredensewoodlandsofhoneymesquiteandmesquitetrees(Prosopisglandulosavar.torreyanaandP.pubescens).
Atonetime,allofthemajorriverbedsintheunincorporatedCountysupportedextensiveareasofriparianforestsandwoodlands.ExamplesofriparianvegetationstillexistalongthemajorriversoftheCounty,includingtheSantaMargarita,SanLuisRey,SanDieguito,SanDiego,Sweetwater,andTijuanaRivers.Riparianvegetationexistsalongstreamandvalleybottomsaswellasdeepcanyonsinareaswherethewatertableisnotfarbelowthesoilsurface(CountyofSanDiego2010a).
Bog and Marsh
Marshesareveryimportantforwildlifeandhavebeenextensivelyreducedbychannelization,dredging,anddevelopment.MostofthemarshesintheunincorporatedCountyarefreshwater,withalkalimarshinareaswherethesoilismorealkaline,andsaltmarshdirectlyalongthecoast.Freshwatermarshesarefoundalongriversandtheirtributaries,aroundtheedgesofwaterbodies,andalsonearnaturalspringsandpondedareaswithinmajorstreamchannels.Rushes(Juncusspp.),bulrushes(Scirpusspp.),andsedges(Carexspp.andScirpusspp.)arecommon,andcattails(Typhaspp.)areoftenfoundintheshallowerwaternearthemarginsofthefreshwatermarsh.Arroyowillow(Salixlasiolepis),blackwillow(S.gooddingii),andredwillow(S.lasiandra)arealsooftenfoundinfreshwatermarshes.Openwaterstandsindepressionsornaturalsprings,andduckweeds(family:Limnaceae)oftenformfloatingmats.Plantspeciesthattypifyalkalimarshareyerbamansa(Anemopsiscalifornica),alkaliheath(Frankeniasalina),andpickleweed(Salicorniaspp.).Mulefatisfoundaroundthemarginsoffreshwateroralkalimarsh.
Freshwatermarshessupportavarietyofanimalspeciesincludingthecommonyellowthroat,redwingedandtricolorblackbirds(AgelaiusphoeniceusandA.tricolor),andseveralspeciesofegrets,rails(Rallusspp.),andmigratoryshorebirds.
Page 8
County of San Diego Section 2.2. Biological Resources
Draft Final Environmental Impact Report
Agriculture Promotion Project 2.2‐6
February 2017
ICF 0054.15
Dune
Smallareasofactive,stabilized,andpartlystabilizeddesertdunesoccurintheBorregoValleyintheDesertSubregion.Desertdunesincludeactivedesertdunes,stabilizedandpartiallystabilizeddesertsandfields,andstabilizedalkalinedunes.Activedesertdunesarebarrenexpansesofactivelymovingsand.Stabilizedandpartiallystabilizeddesertsandfieldsaredesertsandaccumulationsthatarenotobviouslyworkedintodunelandforms.Vegetationvariesfromscantcoverofwidelyscatteredshrubsandherbstonearlyclosedshrubcanopies.
WildlifespeciessupportedbythedunecommunitiesincludereptilessuchasColoradoDesertfringe‐toedlizard(Umanotate),westernshovel‐nosesnake(Chionactisoccipitalisannulata),andColoradoDesertsidewinder(Crotaluscerasteslaterorepens).
Agriculture
Agricultureisusedtodefinelandsthatactivelysupportagriculturalproduction.Commercialagriculturaloperationsincludeorchards,vineyards,dairies,nurseries,chickenranches,fields,androwcrops.Wildlifecanbenonexistentwithinagriculturalareasusedforcommercialrowcrops,orchards,andvineyards;however,fieldsandpasturescanprovidehabitatfornativesmallmammalsandforaginghabitatforraptors,especiallynorthernharriers(Circuscyaneus)andred‐tailedhawks(Buteojamaicensis).
2.2.1.2 Developed Areas, Nonnative Vegetation, and Unvegetated
Developed
Developedareas,orurbanland,consistofallresidential,commercial,andindustrialdevelopments,andlandcoveredbynonnativevegetation(exceptgrasslands).Mosturbantypesofdevelopmentprovidelittlehabitatfornativespecies,butsupportseveralnonnativespecies,suchasrockpigeon(Columbalivia),Europeanstarlings(Sturnusvulgaris),housesparrows(Passerdomesticus),mice,andrats.Nativespeciesthatexemplifyadaptabilitytourbandevelopmentincludethenorthernmockingbird(Mimuspolyglottos),mourningdove(Zenaidamacroura),housefinch(Carpodacusmexicanus),blackphoebe(Sayornisnigricans),opossum(Didelphisvirginiana),andstripedskunk.Duringthepastdecade,Americancrows(Corvusbrachyrhynchos)havemovedintourbanareasoftheunincorporatedCounty.Migratingsongbirdsuselargestandsofornamentalplantingsduringspringorfall,andsomespecies,suchaswhite‐crownedsparrowandcedarwaxwing(Bombycillacedrorum),spendthewinterinresidentialneighborhoodsofthecoastallowlands.Disturbedlandincludesareasinwhichthereissparsevegetativecoverandwherethereisevidenceofsoilsurfacedisturbanceandcompactionfromprevioushumanactivityand/orthepresenceofbuildingfoundationsanddebris.Vegetationondisturbedland(ifpresent)hasahighpredominanceofnonnativeand/orweedyspeciesthatareindicatorsofsurfacedisturbanceandsoilcompaction,suchasRussianthistle(Salsolatragus),telegraphweed(Heterothecagrandiflora),horehound(Marrubiumvulgare),andsow‐thistle(Sonchusoleraceus)(CountyofSanDiego2010a).
Nonnative Vegetation
Nonnativevegetationincludesmanyornamentalplantspeciessuchaseucalyptustrees(Eucalyptusspp.),whicharenotnativebutoccurwithintheCounty.Eucalyptustreesproducealargeamountofleafandbarklitter.Thechemicalandphysicalcharacteristicsofthislitterlimittheabilityofother
Page 9
County of San Diego Section 2.2. Biological Resources
Draft Final Environmental Impact Report
Agriculture Promotion Project 2.2‐7
February 2017
ICF 0054.15
speciestogrowintheunderstory,andfloristicdiversitydecreasesbeneaththecanopyofthesetrees.
Unvegetated
Disturbedlandincludesunvegetatedareasorareasinwhichthereissparsevegetativecoverandwherethereisevidenceofsurfacedisturbanceandcompactionfromprevioushumanactivityand/orthepresenceofbuildingfoundationsanddebris.Whenvegetationoccursondisturbedland,ithasahighpredominanceofnonnativeand/orweedyspeciesthatareindicatorsofsurfacedisturbanceandsoilcompaction,suchasRussianthistle,telegraphweed,horehound,andsow‐thistle.
2.2.1.3 Sensitive Biological Resources
Special‐statusbiologicalresourcesincludedeclininghabitatsandspeciesthathavebeenaccordedspecialrecognitionbyfederal,state,orlocalconservationagenciesandorganizationsasendangered,threatened,rare,orotherwiseofconcern.DatabasesofsuchresourcesaremaintainedbytheCaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife(CDFW,formerlyCaliforniaDepartmentofFishandGame),U.S.FishandWildlifeService(USFWS),andspecialgroupssuchastheCaliforniaNativePlantSociety(CNPS).Sensitivebiologicalresourcesaredefinedasfollows:(1)habitatareasofvegetationcommunitiesthatareunique,ofrelativelylimiteddistribution,orofparticularvaluetowildlife;and(2)speciesthathavebeengivenspecialrecognitionbyfederalorstateagencies,orareincludedinregionalplansduetolimited,declining,orthreatenedpopulations.
FederallistingofendangeredandthreatenedwildlifeandplantsisadministeredbytheUSFWSforterrestrialandfreshwaterspecies,andbytheNationalMarineFisheriesServiceformarineandanadromousspecies.USFWSandNationalMarineFisheriesServicealsorecognizespeciesofspecialconcernthatarecandidatesforlisting.BeforeaplantoranimalspeciescanreceiveprotectionunderthefederalEndangeredSpeciesAct(FESA),itmustfirstbeplacedonthefederallist.Theprogramfollowsastrictlegalprocesstodeterminewhethertolistaspecies.Anendangeredspeciesisdefinedasonethatisindangerofextinctionthroughoutallorasignificantportionofitsrange.Athreatenedspeciesisonethatislikelytobecomeendangeredintheforeseeablefuture.USFWSalsomaintainsalistofplantandanimalspeciesnativetotheUnitedStatesthatarenotspeciesofspecialconcernforpossibleadditiontothefederallistbutthatarenotcurrentlyregulated.
CDFWimplementstheCaliforniaEndangeredSpeciesAct(CESA),whichisaprogramthatissimilarinstructureto,butdifferentindetailfrom,theUSFWSprogramimplementingtheFESA.CDFWmaintainsalistofdesignatedendangered,threatened,andrareplantandanimalspecies.ListedspeciesareeitherdesignatedundertheNativePlantProtectionActordesignatedbytheFishandGameCommission.Inadditiontorecognizingthreelevelsofendangerment,CDFWaffordsinterimprotectiontocandidatespecieswhiletheyarebeingreviewedbytheFishandGameCommission.CDFWalsomaintainsalistof“SpeciesofSpecialConcern,”mostofwhicharespecieswhosebreedingpopulationsinCaliforniamayfaceextirpation.Althoughthesespecieshavenolegalstatus,CDFWrecommendsconsiderationofthemduringanalysisoftheimpactsofaproposedprojecttoprotectdecliningpopulationsandavoidtheneedtolistthemasendangeredinthefuture.TheCESAalsoprotectsplantspecies,whichtheFESAdoesnot.SensitiveplantspeciesarerecordedundertheCaliforniaRarePlantRanking(CRPR),whichismaintainedbyCDFW.
UndertheprovisionofSection15380(d)oftheStateCEQAGuidelines,theleadagency,inmakingadeterminationofsignificance,musttreatrarenon‐listedplantandanimalspeciesasequivalentto
Page 10
County of San Diego Section 2.2. Biological Resources
Draft Final Environmental Impact Report
Agriculture Promotion Project 2.2‐8
February 2017
ICF 0054.15
listedspeciesifsuchspeciessatisfytheminimumbiologicalcriteriaforlisting.Ingeneral,CDFWconsidersspeciesonLists1A,1B,or2oftheInventoryofRareandEndangeredVascularPlantsofCalifornia(CNPS2015)asqualifyingforconsiderationunderthisCEQAprovision.SpeciesontheCNPSList3or4may,butgenerallydonot,qualifyforprotectionunderthisprovision.SpeciesonCNPSList1Aare“presumedextinctinCalifornia.”SpeciesonList1Bare“rareorendangeredinCaliforniaandelsewhere.”SpeciesonLists3and4arethosethatrequiremoreinformationtodeterminestatusandplantsoflimiteddistribution,respectively.
Theprimaryinformationsourceonthedistributionofspecial‐statusspeciesinCaliforniaistheCaliforniaNaturalDiversityDatabase(CNDDB)inventory,whichismaintainedbytheWildlifeandHabitatDataAnalysisBranchoftheCDFW.TheCNDDBinventoryprovidesthemostcomprehensivestatewideinformationonthelocationanddistributionofspecial‐statusspeciesandsensitivenaturalcommunities.Occurrencedataareobtainedfromavarietyofscientific,academic,andprofessionalorganizations;privateconsultingfirms;andknowledgeableindividuals;andisenteredintotheinventoryasexpeditiouslyaspossible.Theoccurrenceofaspeciesofconcerninaparticularregionisanindicationthatanadditionalpopulationmayoccuratanotherlocationifhabitatconditionsaresuitable.However,theabsenceofanoccurrenceinaparticularlocationdoesnotnecessarilymeanthatspecial‐statusspeciesareabsentfromtheareainquestion,onlythatnodatahasbeenenteredintotheCNDDBinventory.
Sensitive Vegetation Communities
Ofthevegetationcommunitieslistabove,thefollowingareconsideredsensitivebyCDFW:scrubandchaparral;woodland;grassland,meadow,vernalpool,andotherherbcommunities;forest;riparian;bogandmarsh;anddune.
Special‐Status Plant and Wildlife Species
Plantorwildlifespeciesareconsideredsensitiveiftheyare:(1)onListA,B,C,orDoftheCountyofSanDiegoSensitivePlantListorGroup1or2oftheCountySensitiveAnimalList(CountyofSanDiego2010b);(2)coveredorlistedasanarrowendemicundertheSouthCountyMultipleSpeciesConservationProgram(MSCP)SubareaPlan(CountyofSanDiego1997);(3)listedbystateorfederalagenciesasthreatened,endangered,orrare,orareproposedforlisting(CDFW2015a,2015b,2015c,2015d);(4)onCRPR1B(consideredendangeredthroughoutitsrange)orCRPR2Aor2B(consideredendangeredinCaliforniabutmorecommonelsewhere)(CDFW2015d);or(5)listedbyotherlocalagencies.Raptors(birdsofprey)andactiveraptornestsareprotectedbytheCaliforniaFishandGameCode,Section3503.5,whichstatesthatitis“unlawfultotake,possess,ordestroyanybirdsintheordersFalconiformesorStrigiformes(birds‐of‐prey)ortotake,possess,ordestroythenestoreggsofanysuchbird”unlessauthorized.
Special‐Status Plant Species
Asof2014,therewereapproximately266special‐statusplantspeciesdocumentedthroughouttheCounty,mostofwhichoccurinuplandhabitatsoutsideofnaturalstreamchannels,creeks,wetlands,andotherspecialaquaticsites.Theremainingspecial‐statusplantspeciestypicallyoccurinnaturalriparianand/oraquaticareas(vernalpools,riparianforests,riparianscrub,riparianwoodland,playas,meadows,marshes,swamps,bogs,andfens).Listedplantspecieshavethepotentialtooccurinprojectareaswheresuitablehabitatandsoilsarepresent.Ofthe266documentedspecial‐statusspecies,34arestate‐and/orfederallylistedendangered,threatened,orrare.Ofthose34species,
Page 11
County of San Diego Section 2.2. Biological Resources
Draft Final Environmental Impact Report
Agriculture Promotion Project 2.2‐9
February 2017
ICF 0054.15
aboutathird(includingGambel’swatercress[Rorippagambellii]andBorregobedstraw[Galiumangustifoliumssp.Borregoense])arelimitedtohigherelevationsthanoccurwithintheincorporatedmunicipalboundaries,ortodeserthabitatsoutsidetheincorporatedboundariesintheCountyandintheprojectarea.Theremaining23listedplantspeciesincludewetland‐orriparian‐associatedspeciesanduplandspecies(RebmanandSimpson2014).
WithintheCounty,USFWShasdesignatedvariousareasascriticalhabitatforfourlistedplantspecies:Otaytarplant(Deinandraconjugens),thread‐leavedBrodiaea(Brodiaeafilifolia),spreadingNavarretia(Navarretiafossalis),andwillowymonardella(Monardellaviminea).PursuanttoSection3oftheFESA,criticalhabitatidentifiesgeographicareasthatcontainfeaturesessentialfortheconservationofathreatenedorendangeredspeciesandmayrequirespecialmanagementconsiderationsorprotection.Inaddition,criticalhabitatincludesspecificareasoutsidethegeographicareaoccupiedbythespeciesatthetimeitislisted,ifitisdeterminedthatsuchareasareessentialfortheconservationofthespecies.
Special‐Status Wildlife Species
Special‐statuswildlifespeciesthatoccur,orhavethepotentialtooccur,intheprojectareabasedonasearchoftheCNDDB(CDFW2015e)areprovidedinTableC‐2inAppendixCoftheCounty’sGeneralPlanUpdateEIR.Ofthepotentiallyoccurringwildlifespecieswithintheprojectarea,19arefederallyendangered,3arefederallythreatened,1isacandidateforfederallisting,and1hasbeendelisted.Elevenofthespecial‐statusspeciesarerecognizedunderCESAasstate‐endangered,5arelistedasstate‐threatenedunderCESA,and51arelistedasCaliforniaSpeciesofConcern.Special‐statuswildlifespeciesarethoselistedasthreatenedorendangered,proposedforlisting,orcandidatesforlistingbyUSFWSandCDFW,andthatareconsideredsensitivebyCDFW.
Intotal,theCountyishometoapproximately114special‐statuswildlifespecies,consistingof21invertebrates,6fish,6amphibians,16reptiles,34birds,and31mammals.Ofthe114specialstatusspecies,only27arestate‐and/orfederallylistedendangeredorthreatened.Ofthe27listedspecies,7(includingdesertpupfish[Cyprinodonmacularius],mountainyellow‐leggedfrog[Ranamuscosa],andpeninsularbighornsheep[Oviscanadensisssp.nelsoni])arelimitedtoareasoutsidetheincorporatedmunicipalboundariesintheCountyandintheprojectarea.Theremaining20wildlifespeciesincludeaquaticspecies,wetland‐orriparian‐associatedspecies,anduplandspecies(EDAW,Inc.2008).USFWShasaffordedcriticalhabitattoeightofthespecies,includingleastBell’svireo,southwesternwillowflycatcher,Quinocheckerspotbutterfly(Euphydryasedithaquino),arroyotoad,coastalCaliforniagnatcatcher,SanDiegofairyshrimp(Branchinectasandiegonensis),Riversidefairyshrimp(Streptocephaluswoottoni),andtidewatergoby(Eucyclogobiusnewberryi).
2.2.1.4 Jurisdictional Wetlands and Waterways
Allwetlands,wetlandbufferareas,andnon‐wetlandwatersoftheUnitedStatesareconsideredsensitivebiologicalresources.Disturbancetowetlandsisregulatedbyseveralagencies,eachofwhichhasveryspecificdefinitionsastowhatconstitutesawetlandandwhattypesofdisturbancesareregulated.Ingeneral,wetlandsandnon‐wetlandwatersareunderthejurisdictionoftheU.S.ArmyCorpsofEngineers(USACE).Underthefederalmethodology,anareaisajurisdictionalwetlandifitmanifestsallofthefollowingundernormalconditions:prevalenceofhydrophyticvegetation,hydricsoils,andwetlandhydrology.StreamsarejurisdictionalareaslocatedbelowtheOrdinaryHighWaterMark,whichisthelineontheshoreestablishedbythefluctuationsofwaterandindicatedbyphysicalcharacteristicssuchasaclear,naturallineimpressedonthebank;
Page 12
County of San Diego Section 2.2. Biological Resources
Draft Final Environmental Impact Report
Agriculture Promotion Project 2.2‐10
February 2017
ICF 0054.15
shelving;changesinthecharacterofsoil;destructionofterrestrialvegetation;thepresenceoflitterandotherdebris;orotherappropriatemeansthatconsiderthecharacteristicsofthesurroundingareas,asdefinedin33CFR328.3(e).WatersoftheUnitedStates,aswellaswatersofthestate,alsoareunderthejurisdictionoftheRegionalWaterQualityControlBoard(RWQCB).TheRWQCBmayregulateisolatedwatersthatUSACEdoesnot.
StreambedswithinCDFWjurisdictionaredefinedasbodiesofwaterthatflowatleastperiodicallyorintermittentlythroughabedorchannelhavingbanksandsupportingfishorotheraquaticlife.Thisincludeswatercourseshavingasurfaceorsubsurfaceflowthatsupportsriparianvegetation.
WetlandsandwetlandbufferareasunderthejurisdictionoftheCountyaredefinedintheCounty’sResourceProtectionOrdinance(RPO).Wetlandsincludelandshavingoneormoreofthefollowingattributes:(1)atleastperiodically,thelandsupportsapredominanceofhydrophytes(plantswhosehabitatiswaterorverywetplaces);(2)thesubstratumispredominantlyundrainedhydricsoil;or(3)anephemeralorperennialstreamispresent,whosesubstratumispredominantlynon‐soilandsuchlandscontributesubstantiallytothebiologicalfunctionsofwetlandsinthedrainagesystem.Landsthathaveoneormoreoftheaboveattributessolelyduetoman‐madestructures(e.g.,culverts,ditches,roadcrossings,oragriculturalponds)arenotconsideredwetlands,providedthattheyhavenegligiblebiologicalfunctionorvalueaswetlands,aresmallandgeographicallyisolatedfromotherwetlandsystems,arenotvernalpools,anddonothavesubstantialorlocallyimportantpopulationsofwetland‐dependentsensitivespecies,pursuanttoRPOSection86.602(q)(2)(aa).Landsthathavebeendegradedbypastlegallanddisturbanceactivitiesthathavenonegligiblebiologicalfunctionorvalueaswetlands(evenifrestoredtotheextentfeasible)andthatdonothavesubstantialorlocallyimportantpopulationsofwetland‐dependentsensitivespeciesalsowouldnotbeconsideredwetland,pursuanttoRPOSection86.602(q)(2)(bb).TheCountyalsohasjurisdictionoverwetlandbuffers,whichprovidebufferareasofanappropriatesize(50to200feetfromtheedgeofthewetland)toprotecttheenvironmentalandfunctionalvaluesofwetlands.
Jurisdictionalwetlandsandwaterwaysoccurthroughouttheprojectarea.Formaljurisdictionaldelineationswouldberequiredtodeterminetheextentofjurisdictionalareas.However,thefollowingvegetationcommunitieswithintheprojectareawouldlikelyfallunderoneorallofthejurisdictionslistedabove:vernalpool,riparian,andbogandmarsh.
2.2.1.5 Wildlife Movement and Habitat Connectivity
Thereareseveralelementsthathelptodefinewildlifemovementandhowwildlifemovespatiallythroughanarea.Wildlifecorridorsarelinearlandscapefeaturesthatconnectlargepatchesofnaturalopenspaceandprovideavenuesforanimalstomigratebetweenthesenaturalareas.Wildlifecorridorscontributetopopulationviabilitybyassuringcontinualexchangeofgenesbetweenpopulations,providingaccesstoadjacenthabitatareasforforagingandmating,andprovidingroutesforrecolonizationofhabitatafterlocalextirpationorecologicalcatastrophes(e.g.,fires).
Habitatlinkagesaresmallpatchesthatjoinlargerblocksofhabitatandhelpreducetheadverseeffectsofhabitatfragmentation.Habitatlinkagesprovideapotentialrouteforgeneflowandlong‐termdispersalofplantsandanimalsandmayalsoserveasprimaryhabitatforsmalleranimals,suchasreptilesandamphibians.Habitatlinkagesmaybecontinuoushabitatordiscretehabitatislandsthatfunctionassteppingstonesfordispersal.Nativewildlifenurserysitesrefertoareasinwhichmembersofthesamespeciescollectivelybreedandrearoffspringinsubstantialnumbers.
Page 13
County of San Diego Section 2.2. Biological Resources
Draft Final Environmental Impact Report
Agriculture Promotion Project 2.2‐11
February 2017
ICF 0054.15
Tofunctioneffectively,awildlifecorridormustlinktwoormorepatchesofhabitatforwhichconnectivityisdesired,anditmustbesuitableforthefocaltargetspeciestoachievethedesireddemographicandgeneticexchangebetweenpopulations.Ingeneral,theCountysupportsamixtureofhighlyurbanizeddevelopment,relativelynaturallands,andintactnaturallandscapesfringedwithencroachingdevelopment.High‐mobility(e.g.,coyoteandmuledeer)andmoderate‐mobility(e.g.,raccoonandstripedskunk)ground‐dwellingspeciesarelikelytoaccessmoreurban,populatedcentersbytraversingmajorroadways,drainageculverts,andstreams/creeks.TheCountysupportsnumerouslarge,contiguousundevelopedareasthatconnectnaturalareasineasternSanDiegoCountytothePacificcoastandprovidemovementareasforwildlife.
Wildlifemovementthroughouttheregionforcommonwildlifeandresidentandmigratoryavifaunaallowsforaccesstoforaginghabitat,breedinghabitat,andwatersourcesnecessaryforreproduction.TheSouthCountyMSCPSubareaPlandefinescorehabitatareas(e.g.,biologicalresourcecoreareas)andlinkagesbetweenthem(e.g.,habitatlinkages).
2.2.2 Regulatory Setting
Biologicalresourcesaresubjecttoregulatoryoversightatthreelevels:federal,state,andlocal.
2.2.2.1 Federal Regulations
Federal Endangered Species Act
TheFESAwasenactedin1973toconservethreatenedandendangeredspeciesandtheirecosystems.Actionsthatjeopardizeendangeredorthreatenedspeciesandthehabitatsuponwhichtheyrelyareconsidereda“take”undertheFESA.Takeofafederallylistedthreatenedorendangeredspeciesisprohibitedwithoutaspecialpermit.TheFESAallowsfortakeofathreatenedorendangeredspeciesincidentaltodevelopmentactivitiesonceaHabitatConservationPlan(HCP)hasbeenpreparedtothesatisfactionoftheUSFWSandanincidentaltakepermithasbeenissued.TheFESAalsoallowsforthetakeofthreatenedorendangeredspeciesafterconsultationwithUSFWShasdeemedthatdevelopmentofthefederalactionassociatedwithactivitieswillnotjeopardizethecontinuedexistenceofthespecies.
“Criticalhabitat”isatermwithintheFESAdesignedtoguideactionsbyfederalagencies(asopposedtostate,local,orotheragencyactions)anddefinedas“anareaoccupiedbyaspecieslistedasthreatenedorendangeredwithinwhicharefoundphysicalorgeographicalfeaturesessentialtotheconservationofthespecies,oranareanotcurrentlyoccupiedbythespecieswhichisitselfessentialtotheconservationofthespecies.”
Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Act)
TheCleanWaterAct(CWA)provideswetlandregulationatthefederallevelaswellasastructureforregulatingdischargesintothewatersoftheUnitedStates.ThepurposeoftheCWAistorestoreandmaintainthechemical,physical,andbiologicalintegrityofallwatersoftheUnitedStates.Throughthisact,theU.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency(EPA)isgiventheauthoritytoimplementpollutioncontrolprograms.Theseincludesettingwastewaterstandardsforindustryandwaterqualitystandardsforcontaminantsinsurfacewaters.Thedischargeofanypollutantfromapointsourceintonavigablewatersisillegalunlessapermitunderitsprovisionsisacquired.In
Page 14
County of San Diego Section 2.2. Biological Resources
Draft Final Environmental Impact Report
Agriculture Promotion Project 2.2‐12
February 2017
ICF 0054.15
California,theStateWaterResourcesControlBoard(SWRCB)andthenineRWQCBsareresponsibleforimplementingtheCWA.
Migratory Bird Treaty Act
TheMigratoryBirdTreatyAct(MBTA)wasenactedin1918toprotectthenativemigratorybirdsoranypart,nest,oreggofsuchbirdunlessallowedbyanotherregulationadoptedinaccordancewiththeMBTA.EnforcedintheUnitedStatesbyUSFWS,theMBTAmakesitunlawfultotake,possess,buy,sell,purchase,orbarteranymigratorybirdlistedinCodeofFederalRegulations(CFR),Title50,Section10,includingfeathersorotherparts,nests,eggs,orproducts,exceptasallowedbyimplementingregulations(50CFR21).Disturbancethatcausesnestabandonmentand/orlossofreproductiveeffort(e.g.,killingorabandonmentofeggsoryoung)maybeconsidereda“take”andispotentiallypunishablebyfinesand/orimprisonment.
Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act
TheBaldandGoldenEagleProtectionActwasenactedin1940toprohibitthetake,transport,orsaleofbaldeagles(Haliaeetusleucocephalus),theireggs,oranypartofaneagleexceptwhereexpresslyallowedbytheSecretaryoftheInterior.Thisactwasamendedin1962toextendthisprotectiontothegoldeneagle(Aquilachrysaetos).
2.2.2.2 State Regulations
California Endangered Species Act
TheCESA,similartotheFESA,containsaprocessforlistingofspeciesandregulatingpotentialimpactsonlistedspecies.Statethreatenedandendangeredspeciesincludebothplantsandwildlife,butdonotincludeinvertebrates.Thedesignation“rarespecies”appliesonlytoCalifornianativeplants.StatethreatenedandendangeredplantspeciesareregulatedlargelyundertheNativePlantPreservationActinconjunctionwiththeCESA.Statethreatenedandendangeredanimalspeciesarelegallyprotectedagainst“take.”TheCESAauthorizesCDFWtoenterintoamemorandumofagreementfortakeoflistedspeciestoissueanincidentaltakepermitforastate‐listedthreatenedandendangeredspeciesonlyifspecificcriteriaaremet.
California Fish and Game Code
TheCaliforniaFishandGameCoderegulatesthetakingorpossessionofbirds,mammals,fish,amphibians,andreptiles,aswellasnaturalresourcessuchaswetlandsandwatersofthestate.TheCaliforniaFishandGameCodeisadministeredbyCDFW.TakeisdefinedinSection86as“hunt,pursue,catch,capture,orkill,orattempttohunt,pursue,catch,capture,orkill.”Section5050listsprotectedamphibiansandreptiles.Section3515prohibitstakeoffullyprotectedfishspecies.EggsandnestsofallbirdsareprotectedunderSection3503,nestingbirds(includingraptorsandpasserines)underSections3503.5and3513,birdsofpreyunderSection3503.5,andfullyprotectedbirdsunderSection3511.Migratorynon‐gamebirdsareprotectedunderSection3800.MammalsareprotectedunderSection4700.TheCESA,describedabove,isprovidedinSections2050–2115.TheStreambedAlterationAgreementregulationsareprovidedinSections1600–1616,describedinmoredetailbelow.
Page 15
County of San Diego Section 2.2. Biological Resources
Draft Final Environmental Impact Report
Agriculture Promotion Project 2.2‐13
February 2017
ICF 0054.15
Streambed Alteration Agreements (Section 1602 et seq.)
CDFWhasjurisdictionalauthorityoverwetlandresourcesassociatedwithrivers,streams,andlakesunderCaliforniaFishandGameCodeSection1602.Section1602oftheCaliforniaFishandGameCoderequiresanyperson,state,orlocalgovernmentalagencytoprovideadvancewrittennotificationtoCDFWpriortoinitiatinganyactivitythatwould:(1)divert,obstructthenaturalflowof,orsubstantiallychangeorremovematerialfromthebed,channel,orbankofariver,stream,orlake;or(2)resultinthedisposalordepositionofdebris,waste,orothermaterialintoanyriver,stream,orlake.TheStatedefinitionof“lakes,rivers,andstreams”includesallriversorstreamsthatflowatleastperiodicallyorpermanentlythroughabedorchannelwithbanksthatsupportfishorotheraquaticlife,andwatercourseswithsurfaceorsubsurfaceflowsthatsupportorhavesupportedriparianvegetation.
Natural Community Conservation Planning Act of 1991
ThestateNaturalCommunityConservationPlanning(NCCP)Actisdesignedtoconservenaturalcommunitiesattheecosystemscalewhileaccommodatingcompatiblelanduse.CDFWistheprincipalstateagencyimplementingtheNCCPprogram.NCCPplansdevelopedinaccordancewiththeactprovideforcomprehensivemanagementandconservationofmultiplewildlifespecies,andtheyidentifyandprovidefortheregionalorarea‐wideprotectionandperpetuationofnaturalwildlifediversitywhileallowingcompatibleandappropriatedevelopmentandgrowth.
Porter‐Cologne Water Quality Control Act
ThePorter–CologneWaterQualityControlActprovidesforstatewidecoordinationofwaterqualityregulations.TheCaliforniaSWRCBwasestablishedasthestatewideauthority,andnineseparateRWQCBsweredevelopedtooverseewaterqualityonaday‐to‐daybasis,whichaffectsregionalbiologicalresources.
2.2.2.3 Local Regulations
San Diego Multiple Species Conservation Program
TheSanDiegoMSCPSubareaPlanisahabitatplanthatencompasses582,000acresandestablishesa172,000‐acrepreservesystemover12jurisdictions.EachjurisdictionhasitsownSubareaPlanandeachdiffersinhowitimplementstheMSCP.TheSubareaPlanfortheCounty’sjurisdiction,adoptedbytheBoardofSupervisorsonOctober22,1997,covers252,132acresinthesouthwesternportionoftheunincorporatedareaandcovers85speciesofplantsandanimalsand23vegetationtypes.About73percent(approximately184,000acres)oftheCountySubareaprovideshabitatfornativeplantsandwildlife.Theremaining27percent(approximately68,000acres)isdisturbed,developed,oragriculturallandthatisconsideredtohavelittletonohabitatvalue.ThedocumentsusedtoimplementtheMSCPincludetheSouthCountySubareaPlan(adoptedOctober1997),theBiologicalMitigationOrdinance(BMO),theFinalMSCPPlan(datedAugust1998),andtheImplementingAgreementbetweentheCountyandwildlifeagencies(signedMarch1998).TheImplementingAgreementbetweenUSFWS,CDFW,andtheCountyisatooltofulfilltheobligationsoftheMSCP.This50‐yearcooperativeagreementprovidesfortheconservationof85plantandanimal“coveredspecies,”establishesmanagementconditions,andrequireseachofthepartiestoperformcertaindutiesandresponsibilities.Italsoprovidesforremediesandrecourseshouldanyofthepartiesfailtoperform.AlldiscretionaryprojectswithintheSubareaPlanboundariesaresubject
Page 16
County of San Diego Section 2.2. Biological Resources
Draft Final Environmental Impact Report
Agriculture Promotion Project 2.2‐14
February 2017
ICF 0054.15
totheMSCPforthesouthernareaoftheCountyandmustcomplywithrequirementsoftheCountyBMO.TheCountySubareaPlanisregulatedbytheBMO,whichoutlinesthespecificcriteriaandrequirementsforprojectswithintheMSCPboundaries.TheMSCPandtheBMOprovidespecificcriteriaforprojectdesign,impactallowances,andmitigationrequirements.
TheMSCPNorthCountyPlaniscurrentlybeingpreparedbytheCountyincoordinationwithUSFWSandCDFW.ThedocumentisajointHCPandNCCP.ADraftNorthCountyPlanwaspreviouslyreleasedforpublicreviewin2009.Sincethattime,thedraftNorthCountyPlanhasbeenupdatedandrevised.TheCountyanticipatesreleasinganupdatedDraftNorthCountyPlanandDraftEIR/EISforpublicreviewin2016/2017.Inthefuture,theCountyalsoanticipatespreparinganMSCPEastCountyPlan.Atthistime,thereisnoscheduleforcompletionofanEastCountyPlan,butitisincludedasafutureprojectontheCounty’sAdvancePlanningWorkProgram.
County of San Diego Code of Regulatory Ordinances Sections 86.501–86.509, Biological Mitigation Ordinance
TheCounty’sBMO(2004)enablestheCountytoachievetheconservationgoalssetforthintheSubareaPlanfortheMSCP.TheBMOsetsforththecriteriaforavoidingimpactsonbiologicalresourcecoreareasandonplantandanimalpopulationswithinthoseareas,aswellasthemitigationrequirementsformostprojectsrequiringadiscretionarypermit.
County of San Diego Code of Regulatory Ordinances Sections 86.601–86.608, Resource Protection Ordinance
TheCounty’sRPOwasadoptedin1989andwaslastamendedinAugust2011.TheRPOplacesspecialcontrolsondevelopmentthatcouldaffecttheCounty’swetlands,wetlandbuffers,floodplains,steepslopes,sensitivebiologicalhabitats,andprehistoricandhistoricsites.CertaindiscretionarypermittypesaresubjecttotherequirementtoprepareresourceprotectionstudiesundertheRPO.SuchdiscretionarypermitsincludeTentativeMaps,TentativeParcelMaps,RevisedTentativeMaps,RevisedTentativeParcelMaps,Rezones,MajorUsePermits(MUPs),MUPmodifications,SitePlans,AdministrativePermits,andOpenSpaceEasementVacations.TheRPOrequiresthatwetlandsandtheiradjacentwetlandbuffersbeprotectedonsiteswherethesepermitsaregranted.However,italsosetsforthcertainallowableuseswithintheseareas.Inaddition,theRPOrequiresthatapplicablediscretionaryprojectsprotectsensitivehabitatlands.Sensitivehabitatlandsincludeuniquevegetationcommunitiesand/orthehabitatthatiseithernecessarytosupportaviablepopulationorsensitivespecies,iscriticaltotheproperfunctioningofabalancednaturalecosystem,orwhichservesasafunctioningwildlifecorridor.
County of San Diego Code of Regulatory Ordinances Sections 86.101–86.105, Habitat Loss Permit Ordinance
TheHabitatLossPermit(HLP)OrdinanceestablishesaprocessthatenablestheCountytoissue“take”permitsforthefederallylistedcoastalCaliforniagnatcatcher(intheformofHLPs)inlieuofthetypicallyrequiredSection7orSection10(a)permits,whichispermittedbytheFESApursuanttotheSpecial4(d)Rule.TheHLPOrdinancewasadoptedinresponsetothefederallistingofthecoastalCaliforniagnatcatcherasathreatenedspeciesandtheadoptionoftheNCCPActbytheState.TheHLPOrdinancerequiresprojectstoobtainanHLPpriortotheissuanceofaGradingPermit,ClearingPermit,orimprovementplaniftheprojectwillindirectlyordirectlyaffectanycoastalsagescrubhabitats.TheHLPisrequiredifcoastalsagescruborrelatedhabitatwillbeaffected,
Page 17
County of San Diego Section 2.2. Biological Resources
Draft Final Environmental Impact Report
Agriculture Promotion Project 2.2‐15
February 2017
ICF 0054.15
regardlessofwhetherornotthesiteiscurrentlyoccupiedbycoastalCaliforniagnatcatcher.HLPsarenotrequiredforprojectswithintheboundariesofanadoptedMSCPbecausetakeauthorizationisconveyedtothoseprojectsthroughcompliancewiththeMSCP.
County of San Diego Code of Regulatory Ordinances Sections 67.801–67.814, Watershed Protection, Stormwater Management, and Discharge Control Ordinance
TheCounty’sWatershedProtection,StormwaterManagement,andDischargeControlOrdinance(WPO)wasadoptedinMarch2008andrevisedinJanuary2010.TheWPOestablishesstandardsandrequirementsthatarelegallyenforceablebytheCountywithintheCounty’sjurisdiction.Projectsthatrequireapermit(e.g.,AdministrativePermit,MajorUsePermit,GradingPermit)arerequiredtodemonstratecompliancewiththeWPO.RequirementsintheWPOareintendedto(1)prohibitpollutednon‐stormwaterdischargestothestormwaterconveyancesystemandreceivingwaters,(2)establishrequirementstopreventandreducepollutiontowaterresources,(3)establishrequirementsfordevelopmentprojectsitedesigntoreducestormwaterpollutionanderosion,(4)establishrequirementsforthemanagementofstormwaterflowsfromdevelopmentprojectstopreventerosionandtoprotectandenhanceexistingwater‐dependenthabitats,(5)establishstandardsfortheuseofoffsitefacilitiesforstormwatermanagementtosupplementonsitepracticesatnewdevelopmentsites,and(6)establishnoticeproceduresandstandardsforadjustingstormwaterandnon‐stormwatermanagementrequirements,wherenecessary.
Special Area Regulations
TheprovisionsofSanDiegoCountyZoningOrdinanceSections5000through5999areknownastheSpecialAreaRegulationsandincludeatotalof15designators.ThepurposeoftheseprovisionsistosetforthspecializedregulationsthathavelimitedapplicationwithintheCounty,butwhichassurethatconsiderationisprovidedinthoseareasofspecialinterestorunusualvalue.SomeSpecialAreaRegulationsarefortheprotectionofbiologicalresources,includingSections5300through5307,SensitiveResourceAreaRegulations(DesignatorG);Sections5950through5957,CoastalResourceProtectionAreaRegulations(DesignationR);and/orSections5850through5856,VernalPoolAreaRegulations(DesignatorV).
2.2.3 Analysis of Project Effects and Determination of Significance
TheproposedprojectconsistsofanamendmenttotheZoningOrdinancerelatedtoaccessoryagriculturalusesinunincorporatedportionsoftheCountyoverwhichtheCountyhaslandusejurisdictions(seeSection1.4,ProjectDescription,forfurtherdetails).Specifically,theproposedprojectappliestopropertieswhereactiveagricultureexistswithintheCountyorpropertieswhereagriculturalusesareallowed.DuringtheInitialStudypreparationandscopingprocessforthisproject,whichconsideredpotentiallysignificantenvironmentalimpactsandinvolveda30‐daypubliccommentperiod,itwasdeterminedthattheproposedprojectwouldnotresultinasignificantimpactrelatedtoconflictswithlocalpoliciesorordinancesprotectingbiologicalresourcesoradoptedhabitatconservationplans.Assuch,potentialimpactsrelatedtolocalpoliciesandordinancesprotectingbiologicalresourcesarenotevaluatedbelowandarefurtherdiscussedintheInitialStudypreparedfortheproject,whichisprovidedasAppendixB.AdiscussionofadoptedhabitatconservationplansisincludedinSection2.2.3.5,below,tosupplementtheInitialStudy.
Page 18
County of San Diego Section 2.2. Biological Resources
Draft Final Environmental Impact Report
Agriculture Promotion Project 2.2‐16
February 2017
ICF 0054.15
Threecommentlettersthatarerelevanttobiologicalresourceswerereceivedduringthe30‐daypubliccommentperiod.TheCityofSanDiegoindicatedthatMSCPcornerstonelandsareofconcernforthelocalgovernment.TheClevelandNationalForestindicatedthatbiologicalresourcesareofparticularconcernfortheagencyandrequestedthattheEIRconsidereffectsofintensifiedlandusesontheforest.CDFWrecommendedthattheEIRevaluatehowtheproposedprojectandrelatedpotentialforagriculturalexpansionwouldaffecttheCounty’sadoptedSouthCountyMSCPSubareaPlanandthein‐progressNorthCountyandEastCountyMSCPplans.
2.2.3.1 Candidate, Sensitive, or Special‐Status Species
Guidelines for the Determination of Significance
ThefollowingsignificanceguidelinefromAppendixGoftheStateCEQAGuidelinesappliestoboththedirectandcumulativeimpactanalyses.Asignificantimpactwouldresultif:
Theprojectwouldhaveasubstantialadverseeffect,eitherdirectlyorthroughhabitatmodifications,onacandidate,sensitive,orspecial‐statusspecieslistedinlocalorregionalplans,policies,orregulations,orbytheCaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlifeorU.S.FishandWildlifeService.
Analysis
AsdiscussedinSection2.2.1,ExistingConditions,above,special‐statusspeciesincludeplantsandanimalsthatareofficiallyrecognizedbyfederal,state,and/orlocalagenciesandorganizationsbasedoneitherlimited,declining,orthreatenedpopulationsizes.Candidatespeciesincludespeciesthatareeligibleandcouldbelisted,buthavenotyetbeenformallyrecognized,asspecial‐statusspecies.Collectively,thesecandidate,sensitive,andspecial‐statusspeciesarereferredtoassensitivespeciesforthepurposesofthissection.TheproposedamendmentstotheCounty’sZoningordinancewouldpromoteandencourageadditionallanduseactivitiesonactiveagriculturalpropertiesthroughoutunincorporatedSanDiegoCounty.Disturbancerelatedtoclearinglandforneworadditionaluseableareaorforbuildingstructurescouldresultinadversedirecteffectsoncandidate,sensitive,orspecial‐statusspecies.TheaccessoryagriculturalusesincludedaspartoftheproposedupdatetotheCounty’sZoningOrdinancewouldgenerallyincreaseactivitiesonagriculturalpropertiesandcouldresultinadverseindirecteffectsonsensitivespeciesonsiteornearby.Potentialimpactsassociatedwitheachoftheusesthatwouldbepromotedwithadoptionoftheproposedprojectaredescribedbelow.
Agricultural Homestays
AgriculturalhomestaysarecurrentlyregulatedanddefinedintheCounty’sZoningOrdinance;however,theproposedchangestotheZoningOrdinancewouldpromotehomestayusesbyreducingthelevelofreviewrequired,and,assuch,operationssimilartoexistinghomestayoperationsareanticipatedtogenerallyincrease.Agriculturalhomestayoperationsincludetemporarylodgingforguestswhowouldoccupyaroominanexistingresidenceorwithinadetachedcabinonpropertiesof4acresorlargerintheA70,A72,andS92zones,uponapprovalofaMinorUsePermit.Adoptionoftheproposedprojectwouldresultintheextensionofagriculturalhomestaysonproperties4acresorlargerintheRRandS90zonesalso.Inaddition,agriculturalhomestayswouldbeallowedwithaministerialZoningVerificationPermitratherthanadiscretionaryMinorUsePermit,subjecttocertaincriteria.Directimpactscouldresultifanewresidence(onavacantlot)oradetachedcabinareplacedonhabitatoccupiedbysensitivespecies,andotherassociatedimpactscouldoccur
Page 19
County of San Diego Section 2.2. Biological Resources
Draft Final Environmental Impact Report
Agriculture Promotion Project 2.2‐17
February 2017
ICF 0054.15
asaresultofadditionaldevelopmenttosupportagriculturalhomestayactivities.Futuredevelopmentofanewresidence(onavacantlot)oradetachedcabintosupportanagriculturalhomestaywouldnotnecessarilyrequireanydiscretionaryreviewunlessaMajorGradingPermitisrequired(seeSection1.4.2inChapter1,ProjectDescription,fordetailsonpermittingrequirements).Assuch,insomeinstances,agriculturalhomestayscouldbeapprovedandpermittedwithoutreviewforpotentialimpactsonsensitivespecies.BecausesensitivespeciesareknowntoexistonagriculturalpropertiesintheunincorporatedCounty,andthereisnotenoughinformationorevidencetocompletelydismissthepotentialforimpacts,theproposedprojectcouldresultindirectimpactsonsensitivespeciesasaresultofpromotingthedevelopmentandoperationofagriculturalhomestays.Also,additionallanddisturbanceactivitiescouldresultfromsiteimprovementstosupportagriculturalhomestays,suchasparkingareas,storageareas,andrecreationalorothervisitorgatheringareas.Inothercases,proponentsofanagriculturalhomestaythatwouldutilizeuptothreeroomswithinanexistingresidenceonthepropertymaynotneedtoconstructanewstructureandmayavoidpotentiallysignificantimpactsonsensitivespecies.However,thepotentialforrelatedparkingareasorotherlanddisturbanceactionstosupportagriculturalhomestayswithinexistingbuildingswouldstillexist,andimpactswouldstillpotentiallybesignificant.MSCPandopenspacecompliancewouldbereviewedthroughtheministerialgradingchecklistandwouldlimitthepotentialforadverseimpactsonsensitivespecies;however,thereisthepotentialfordirectimpactsonsensitivespeciestooccurrelatedtositedisturbanceorclearingactivitiesandforindirectimpactstooccurduetoincreasedagriculturalhomestaysinoperationthroughoutunincorporatedSanDiegoCounty.
Agricultural and Horticultural Retail Sales
TheprojectwouldalsoinvolveamendingthelanguageintheZoningOrdinancerelatedtoagriculturalandhorticulturalretailuseswithinA70,A72,S88,S90,S92,andRRzones,includingagriculturalstandsandagriculturalstores(bothsmallandlarge).ProjectapprovalwouldallowforanagriculturalstandbyrightinS88zonesthatcouldcontainsensitivespecies.Anagriculturalstandwouldincludearoadsidestandupto300squarefeetinsizetobeoperatedbythepropertyownerortenantandwouldbeusedtosellagriculturalproductsproducedonsite.Agriculturalstoreswouldincludeindividualdevelopmentprojectsinvolvinglandclearingtosupportupto1,500squarefeetforsmallagriculturalstoresandupto3,000squarefeetforlargeagriculturalstores.Anagriculturalstoreisintendedtosellanddisplayproductsproducedorraisedonthesiteandwouldbecomposedofretailspace.Parkingareaswouldberequiredtosupportanagriculturalstoreandwouldresultinadditionalsitedisturbanceactivities.Forlargeagriculturalstores,someoftheindoorspacewouldsupportfoodpreparationandindoorseatingareasforpatrons.Smallagriculturalstoreswouldnotincludefoodservicespace.Visitorandgeneralactivitywouldincreaseonpropertiesthatdevelopanagriculturalstandorstore,andthedevelopmentfootprintcouldincreasefromtheretailuseandassociatedparkingareas.Therefore,amendingthelanguageintheZoningOrdinancerelatedtoagriculturalandhorticulturalretailuseswithinA70,A72,S88,S90,S92,andRRzonescouldresultinpotentiallysignificantindirectanddirectimpactsonsensitivespecies.
Agricultural Tourism
Adoptionoftheproposedprojectwouldcontinuetoallowagriculturaltourismactivitiessuchasu‐pickoperations,onsitetours,andonsiteagriculturalinstructionanddemonstrationsbyrightinseveralzones;however,theseby‐rightuseswouldbeextendedintotheS88zone,andlanguagewouldbeaddedtotheZoningOrdinancetospecificallyprohibiteventsinvolvinglargergroupsofpeople(suchasweddings,musicconcerts,etc.).Sitedisturbanceordevelopmentprojectsrelatedto
Page 20
County of San Diego Section 2.2. Biological Resources
Draft Final Environmental Impact Report
Agriculture Promotion Project 2.2‐18
February 2017
ICF 0054.15
agriculturaltourismwouldlikelybeminimalbutcouldincludeadditionalparkingareas,additionalclearedareasforinstruction,demonstrations,orotheroperations,andadditionalareasforstorageofrelatedequipmentandmaterials.Dependingonthespecificsite,sensitivebiologicalresourcescouldexistandcouldbeaffectedbythedevelopmentofanyadditionalparkingareasorotherareasthatareclearedtosupportagriculturaltourism.Therefore,implementationofagriculturaltourismintheS88zonecouldresultinpotentiallysignificantindirectanddirectimpactsonsensitivespecies.
Animal Raising
Theproposedproject‐relatedchangestotheZoningOrdinancecouldresultinmoreanimalsonagriculturalproperties,anditispossiblethatareasonactiveagriculturalpropertiesthatcontainsensitivespeciescouldbeclearedordisturbedtomakespaceforadditionalanimalkeepingactivities.Accessoryimprovements,suchasincreasedparkingareas,arenotanticipatedasaresultofthechangestotheanimalschedulebecausethereisnovisitorcomponenttotheproposedanimaldesignatorchanges.Assuch,impactsaregenerallylimitedtodirectimpactsassociatedwiththeclearingoflandtoaccommodateadditionalanimalsonagivensite.
Aquaponics and Hydroponics
TheproposedchangestotheZoningOrdinancewouldadddefinitionsforbothaquaponicsandhydroponics.Typicalsystemsinvolvetheinstallationofwatertanksandgrowingareas.Theareasrequiredforthesesystemsvariesdependingonthescaleoftheoperation;however,theytypicallyinvolvetheuseofwatertanksforplantsand/orfishandassociatedpipesandpumpingsystemseitheroutdoorsorwithinagreenhousetypeofstructure.Theinstallationanduseofanaquaponicsorhydroponicssystemmayinvolvenewsitedisturbanceandthereforehasthepotentialtoresultinimpactsonsensitivespecies.Becauseaquaponicsandhydroponicssystemswouldbeaccessorytotheexistingagriculturaloperationsonanyindividualpropertyandarenotexpectedtocreateademandformoreemployeesorvisitors,therewouldbelimitedsitedisturbance,ifany,relatedtoexpandedparkingareasorotherimprovementsrelatedtoaquaponicsandhydroponicsoperations.Therefore,tTheinstallationanduseofanaquaponicsorhydroponicssystemmayinvolvenewsitedisturbanceandthereforehasthepotentialtocouldresultinpotentiallysignificantindirectanddirectimpactsonsensitivespecies.
Creamery/Dairy
Implementationoftheproposedcreamery/dairyusescouldresultinindividualdevelopmentprojectsinvolvinglandclearingtosupportuptoa4,000‐square‐footbuilding;constructionofancillaryparkingareas,driveways,fences,andoutdoorseating;andanincreaseinsiteactivityrelatedtoadditionalvisitorsandnewemployees.Creamery/dairyuseswouldrequirethedevelopmentofnon‐residentialstructurestosupporttheproductionofbutter,cream,milk,orcheesewithinanenclosedbuilding,andwouldalsorequireindoorspaceforproductstorageintendedforwholesalesalesaswellasretailsales.Parkingareas,driveways,andfenceswouldalsobeincludedastypicalsiteimprovementsassociatedwiththedevelopmentofnewstructureswithretailcomponents.Therefore,theimplementationanduseofcreameriesanddairiesmayinvolvenewsitedisturbanceandcouldresultinpotentiallysignificantindirectanddirectimpactsonsensitivespecies.
Page 21
County of San Diego Section 2.2. Biological Resources
Draft Final Environmental Impact Report
Agriculture Promotion Project 2.2‐19
February 2017
ICF 0054.15
Fishermen’s Markets
Impactsonsensitivebiologicalresourcesrelatedtofishermen’smarketsareexpectedtobelessthansignificant.Fishermen’smarketsinvolvetheretailsaleoffishtothegeneralpublicandwouldbeallowedonatemporarybasis,similartofarmers’markets,ondevelopedpublicpropertyzonedforcommercialuse,onschoolproperty,orinconjunctionwithafarmers’market.Theretailareaitselfwouldlikelyconsistofashadetentorstructureandoutdoortablesandwouldnotrequirepermanentstructuresorothersiteimprovements.Itisnotanticipatedthatafishermen’smarketwouldinvolvegrounddisturbanceorclearingactivities,andbecausetheywouldoccuronschoolpropertiesordevelopedcommercialareas,itisnotexpectedthatanysensitivespecieswouldoccurwhereafishermen’smarketwouldtakeplace.
Microbreweries, Cideries, and Micro‐Distilleries
Agriculturalmicrobreweries,cideries,andmicro‐distilleriesarenotcurrentlyregulatedintheCounty’sZoningOrdinance,andtheproposedprojectwouldpermitlargeoperationsunderadiscretionarypermit(AdministrativePermit)andsmalloperationsunderaministerialpermit(ZoningVerificationPermit).Implementationoftheproposedagriculturalmicrobrewery,cidery,andmicro‐distilleryusescouldincludeindividualdevelopmentprojectsinvolvinglandclearingtosupportuptoa5,000‐square‐footbuilding;constructionofancillaryparkingareas,driveways,fences,oroutdoorseating;andanincreaseinthenumberofvisitorsandemployeesinagriculturalareas.Buildingsassociatedwithagriculturalmicrobreweries,cideries,andmicro‐distillerieswouldbedevelopedtohousebrewingequipmentandmachinery,aswellasprovideforretailsalesandatastingroomforlargemicrobreweries,cideries,andmicro‐distilleries.Dependingonthespecificsiteandplacementoffuturefacilities,significantenvironmentalimpactsonsensitivespeciescouldresult,similartothediscussionaboveforagriculturalhomestays.
Mobile Butchering
Mobilebutcheringactivitiesproposedaspartoftheprojectwouldinvolveamotorvehicleand/ortrailertravelingtoagriculturalpropertiestoprocessanimals.Insomecases,agriculturaloperationsmayclearanareaandpouraconcreteslabforthisperiodicuse.Itispossiblethatsomeadditionalstoragemayalsobedevelopedtosupportmobilebutcheringusesthatcouldinvolvelimitedgrounddisturbanceorclearingactivities.Therefore,theproposedmobilebutcheringactivitiesmayinvolvenewsitedisturbanceandcouldresultinpotentiallysignificantindirectanddirectimpactsonsensitivespecies.
Wineries
Theproposedchangestowineriesincludedaspartoftheprojectcouldincludeindividualdevelopmentprojectsinvolvinglandclearingtosupportuptoa5,000‐square‐footbuilding;constructionofancillaryparkingareas,driveways,fences,andoutdoorseating;andanincreaseinvisitorsandemployeesinagriculturalareas.Futuredevelopmentwouldbenecessarytohousevariousequipmentassociatedwithwinemaking,tostorewineduringtheagingprocess,andtoprovidefortastingroomsandotherretailspace.
AsdiscussedinSection1.4,ProjectDescription,someoftheproposedaccessoryagriculturalusesmaybepermittedwithaministerialpermitorallowedbyright,andmaynotrequireadditionalorsubsequentenvironmentalreviewpursuanttoCEQA.However,forsomeusesthatwouldrequireaministerialpermit,adiscretionarygradingpermitmayberequireddependingontheamountof
Page 22
County of San Diego Section 2.2. Biological Resources
Draft Final Environmental Impact Report
Agriculture Promotion Project 2.2‐20
February 2017
ICF 0054.15
earthworkinvolved(e.g.,200cubicyardsofimportorexportisneededormorethan2,500cubicyardsofgradingisproposed),andadditionalenvironmentalreviewpursuanttoCEQAwouldberequired.Eventhoughsubsequentenvironmentalreviewisanticipatedforsomecomponentsoftheproposedproject,suchaslargemicrobreweries,thereisnoguaranteethatfutureenvironmentalreviewwouldconcludethatimpactswouldbelessthansignificant.
Summary
TheproposedamendmentstotheCounty’sZoningOrdinancewouldpromoteandencourageadditionallanduseactivitiesonactiveagriculturalpropertiesthroughoutunincorporatedSanDiegoCounty.Impactsoncandidate,sensitive,orspecial‐statusspeciescouldresultdirectlyfromdisturbancerelatedtoclearinglandforneworadditionalusableareaorforbuildingstructures.Indirectimpactscouldresultfromthegeneralexpectedincreaseinactivitiesonagriculturalpropertiesthatcouldoccuronlandswithsensitivespeciesonsiteornearby.Directandindirectimpactsrelatedtocandidate,sensitive,orspecial‐statusspeciesareconsideredtobepotentiallysignificantandunavoidable(ImpactBI‐1).
2.2.3.2 Riparian Habitat or Sensitive Natural Community
Guidelines for the Determination of Significance
ThefollowingsignificanceguidelinefromAppendixGoftheStateCEQAGuidelinesappliestoboththedirectandcumulativeimpactanalyses.Asignificantimpactwouldresultif:
Theprojectwouldhaveasubstantialadverseeffectonriparianhabitatoranothersensitivenaturalcommunityidentifiedinlocalorregionalplans,policies,regulations,orbytheCaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlifeorU.S.FishandWildlifeService.
Analysis
Riparianhabitatgenerallyoccursalongrivers,streams,anddrainagesandcanprovideconnectionsforterrestrialandaquatichabitats.LocalandregionalplansthataddresssensitivenaturalcommunitiesincludetheCountyofSanDiegoMSCP,theCountyofSanDiegoRPO,NCCP,FishandGameCode,ESA,andCWA,asdiscussedaboveunderSection2.2.2,RegulatorySetting.CompliancewiththeprovisionsintheseplanswouldberequiredforallfutureprojectsassociatedwiththeproposedchangestotheZoningOrdinance.Asdiscussedaboveundertheimpactanalysisforsensitivespecies,theproposedchangestotheZoningOrdinancecouldsimilarlyresultingrounddisturbanceandincreasedvisitorandemployeeactivityonagriculturalpropertiesthatcouldresultinsignificantimpactsonriparianhabitatorsensitivenaturalcommunities,withtheexceptionoffishermen’smarketsastheywouldoccuronschoolsitesordevelopedcommercialareas.Increasesinbuildingandparkingareas,driveways,fences,oroutdoorseatingcouldoccurassociatedwithneworexpandedagriculturalhomestays,agriculturalmicrobreweries,cideries,andmicro‐distilleries,agriculturalandhorticulturalretailuses,agriculturaltourism,animalraising,aquaponics,creamery/dairy,mobilebutchering,andwineries,whichcouldpotentiallyaffectriparianhabitatorsensitivenaturalcommunities.
Compliancewithlocalandregionalplansthataddresssensitivenaturalcommunitieswouldberequiredaspartofthediscretionaryreviewprocessforlargerprojectsaswellaspartoftheministerialgradingpermitreviewprocessforministerialprojects.Ifriparianhabitatorothersensitivenaturalcommunitiesexistonaspecificprojectsite,avoidance,mitigation,and/or
Page 23
County of San Diego Section 2.2. Biological Resources
Draft Final Environmental Impact Report
Agriculture Promotion Project 2.2‐21
February 2017
ICF 0054.15
minimizationofimpactswouldberequired.However,evenwithcompliancewiththeCounty’sMSCPandotherlocalandregionalplansthatprotectriparianhabitatandsensitivenaturalcommunities,thereisnoguaranteeorindicationthatimpactswouldbereducedtoalevelbelowsignificanceuntilasite‐specificprojectsiteanddesignisdevelopedandreviewedbytheappropriateregulatoryagencies,includingtheCountyofSanDiego.Furthermore,itisanticipatedthatadditionalgrounddisturbanceislikelytooccurtofurthersupportaccessoryagriculturalusessuchasfences,parkingareas,outdoorseatingoreatingareas,oradditionalstorageareas.Thepotentialforadditionalgrounddisturbancetooccurwithoutreviewforpotentialimpactsperlocalorregionalplans,policies,orregulationsrepresentsapotentiallysignificantimpactonriparianorsensitivenaturalcommunities.
Compliancewithapplicablelocalandregionalplanscouldbeachievedandstillresultinsignificantunavoidableimpacts.Adiscretionarygradingpermitmaybetriggeredbythelargeraccessoryagriculturaluses,suchasagriculturalmicrobreweries,cideries,andmicro‐distilleries,wineries,andagriculturalstores,whichcouldrequireenvironmentalreviewpursuanttoCEQA;however,whileabestefforttoavoid,minimize,andmitigatepotentialimpacts,thereisnoguaranteethatimpactstoriparianhabitatorsensitivenaturalcommunitieswouldbeconcludedtobelessthansignificantwithorwithoutmitigation.
Therefore,impactsonriparianhabitatandsensitivenaturalcommunitiesfromtheadoptionoftheproposedZoningOrdinanceamendmentsareconsideredtobepotentiallysignificant(ImpactBI‐2).
2.2.3.3 Federally Protected Wetlands
Guidelines for the Determination of Significance
ThefollowingsignificanceguidelinefromAppendixGoftheStateCEQAGuidelinesappliestoboththedirectandcumulativeimpactanalyses.Asignificantimpactwouldresultif:
TheprojectwouldhaveasubstantialadverseeffectonfederallyprotectedwetlandsasdefinedbySection404oftheCleanWaterAct(including,butnotlimitedto,marsh,vernalpool,coastal,etc.)throughdirectremoval,filling,hydrologicalinterruption,orothermeans.
Analysis
FederallyprotectedwetlandsaredefinedinSection404oftheCWAasareasthatareinundatedorsaturatedbysurfaceorgroundwateratafrequencyanddurationsufficienttosupport,andthatundernormalcircumstancesdosupport,aprevalenceofvegetationtypicallyadaptedforlifeinsaturatedsoilconditions.Suchwetlandsgenerallyincludeswamps,marshes,bogs,andsimilarareas.DirectimpactsonfederallyprotectedwetlandswouldoccurifdevelopmentundertheproposedZoningOrdinanceAmendmentwouldresultintheremoval,filling,hydrologicalinterruption,orotherdisturbancetotheseresources.Someaccessoryagriculturalusesmaybelocatedondevelopedlotsoralreadyclearedareasandmaynothaveanimpactonfederallyprotectedwetlands;however,otherfutureaccessoryusestoagriculturemaybebuiltonlandthatcontainsfederallyprotectedwetlands,includingvernalpools.Compliancewithpermitrequirementsandregulationsatthestateandfederallevelwouldberequiredofallfuturedevelopment,whichwouldgenerallyrequireeitheravoidance,minimization,ormitigationforpotentialwetlandimpacts.Becausethereisnospecificdevelopmentproposalassociatedwiththeproposedproject,compliancewithfederalpermittingrequirementsdoesnotapplytoadoptionoftheproposedchangestothe
Page 24
County of San Diego Section 2.2. Biological Resources
Draft Final Environmental Impact Report
Agriculture Promotion Project 2.2‐22
February 2017
ICF 0054.15
CountyZoningOrdinance.However,similartothediscussionaboveforsensitivespecies,associateddevelopmentisanticipatedformostoftheaccessoryagriculturaluses,whichmaynotbereviewedforpotentialimpacts,andsignificantimpactscouldoccur.Forinstance,parkingareasoroutdoorseatingareastosupportvariousproposedaccessoryagriculturalusesmaynotrequireanypermitreview,and,assuch,grounddisturbanceonanagriculturalpropertycouldoccurandimpactafederallyprotectedwetland,suchasavernalpool.
Twofederalagencies,USACEandRWQCB,regulatethedischargeofdredgedorfillmaterialintowatersoftheUnitedStatesunderSections401and404oftheCWA.Section401oftheCWArequiresafederallicenseorpermittoconductanyactivitythatmayresultinadischargeofapollutantintowatersoftheUnitedStatesandtoobtainacertificationthatthedischargewillcomplywiththeapplicableeffluentlimitationsandwaterqualitystandards.Atthestatelevel,theLakeandStreambedAlterationProgramrequireswrittennotificationtoCDFWpriortoalteringariparianarea(atypeofwetland)supportedbyalake,river,orstream,includingfederallyprotectedwetlands.Forwaterqualityimpactsonallwetlands,theCaliforniaPorter–CologneWaterQualityControlActdirectstheRWQCBstodevelopregionalBasinPlans,whicharedesignedtopreserveandenhancethequalityofwaterresourcesineachregion.Atthelocallevel,theCountyRPOrestrictsimpactsonvariouswetlands,wetlandbuffers,floodways,andfloodplainfringeareas,whichpotentiallycontainfederallyprotectedwetlands.Inaddition,boththeWPOandtheZoningOrdinanceincludespecialprotectionsforwetlandsthatwouldapplytofederallyprotectedwetlands.Compliancewiththesepermitrequirementsandregulationswouldminimizesubstantialadverseimpactsonfederallyprotectedwetlands.Regardlessofminimizationofimpactsonwetlands,includingvernalpools,impactsareconsideredtobepotentiallysignificant.
Implementationoftheproposedprojectwouldpromoteusesthatcouldresultingrounddisturbanceactivitiesonagriculturalproperties;althoughexistingfederalregulationswouldbeenforcedthroughthepermittingprocess,itisexpectedthatfutureimplementationoftheproposedprojectcouldalsoinvolvenon‐permittedsitedisturbanceactivities,suchasparkingandseatingareasforvisitors,and,asaresult,theproposedprojectcouldviolatefederalregulationsrelatedtowetlands.Impactsonfederallyprotectedwetlandsasaresultofprojectimplementationareconsideredtobepotentiallysignificant(ImpactBI‐3).
2.2.3.4 Wildlife Movement
Guidelines for the Determination of Significance
ThefollowingsignificanceguidelinefromAppendixGoftheStateCEQAGuidelinesappliestoboththedirectandcumulativeimpactanalyses.Asignificantimpactwouldresultif:
Theprojectwouldinterferesubstantiallywiththemovementofanynativeresidentormigratoryfishorwildlifespeciesorwithestablishednativeresidentormigratorywildlifecorridorsorimpedetheuseofnativewildlifenurserysites.
Analysis
Theproposedprojectwouldencourageactivitiesthatmayresultinlandclearingand/ordevelopmentinactiveagriculturalareas.Newlandclearingordevelopmentcouldadverselyaffectwildlifemovementifitoccursonlandthatcontainsnativehabitatthatprovideslinkagestowildlifecorridors.FuturedevelopmentundertheproposedZoningOrdinanceAmendmentwouldalsohavethepotentialtobelocatedinareasthatwouldaffectnurserysites.Nurserysitesarelocated
Page 25
County of San Diego Section 2.2. Biological Resources
Draft Final Environmental Impact Report
Agriculture Promotion Project 2.2‐23
February 2017
ICF 0054.15
throughoutthehabitatsoftheunincorporatedCountyandincludeareasthatprovidetheresourcesnecessaryforreproductionofaspecies,includingforaginghabitat,breedinghabitat,andwatersources.
Asdiscussedaboveundertheimpactanalysesforsensitivespeciesandriparianhabitat,theproposedchangestotheZoningOrdinancecouldresultingrounddisturbanceandincreasedvisitorandemployeeactivityonagriculturalproperties,withtheexceptionoffishermen’smarketsastheywouldoccuronschoolsitesordevelopedcommercialareas.Forproposedaccessoryagriculturalusesthatwouldnotrequirefurtherenvironmentalreview,increasesinbuildingandparkingareas,driveways,fences,oroutdoorseatingcouldoccurassociatedwithneworexpandedagriculturalhomestays,agriculturalmicrobreweries,cideries,andmicro‐distilleries,agriculturalandhorticulturalretailuses,agriculturaltourism,animalraising,aquaponics,creamery/dairy,mobilebutchering,andwineries,whichcouldpotentiallyaffectwildlifemovement.Althoughthelargeraccessoryagriculturaluses,suchasagriculturalmicrobreweries,wineries,andagriculturalstorescouldundergofutureenvironmentalreviewpursuanttoCEQA,thereisnoguaranteethatanyidentifiedpotentialimpactswouldbelessthansignificant.Aspartofthediscretionarypermittingprocessforlargeraccessoryagriculturalusesthatdorequireenvironmentalreview,proposedprojectswouldberequiredtodetermineifabiologicalresourcesreportisrequired,pursuanttotheCountyGuidelinesforDeterminingSignificanceandReportFormatandContentRequirementsforBiologicalResources.Ifrequired,thereportwouldanalyzepotentialeffectsofprivateandpublicprojectsonwildlifemovements,corridors,andnurserysites;wouldevaluatesite‐specificconditionsandidentifypotentialimpacts;andwouldsuggestfeasiblemitigationmeasures.Indirecteffectsrelatedtolightingandnoisemayalsofurtherimpactwildlifecorridorsorlinkages.
Implementationoftheproposedprojectwouldpromoteusesthatcouldresultinthedevelopmentofpermanentstructuresandtheexpansionofactivitiesonagriculturalpropertiesthathavethepotentialtointerferewithwildlifemovementorimpedetheuseofnativewildlifenurserysitesifdisturbanceornewdevelopmentissitedwithinoradjacenttoanareathatsupportsthisuse.Althoughthepossibilityofanimpactoccurringisslight,asexplainedabove,therearecircumstanceswhenactivitiessupportedbytheprojectcouldresultinthisoccurrence;therefore,itisconcludedthatimpactsfromtheprojectonwildlifemovementwouldbepotentiallysignificant(ImpactBI‐4).
2.2.3.5 Habitat Conservation Plans
Guidelines for the Determination of Significance
ThefollowingsignificanceguidelinefromAppendixGoftheStateCEQAGuidelinesappliestoboththedirectandcumulativeimpactanalyses.Asignificantimpactwouldresultif:
TheprojectwouldconflictwiththeprovisionsofanadoptedHabitatConservationPlan,NaturalCommunityConservationPlan,orotherapprovedlocal,regional,orstatehabitatconservationplan.
Analysis
Theprojectareacangenerallybedividedintotwoareasforthepurposeofthistopic:(1)areascoveredbytheadoptedSouthCountyMSCPSubareaPlan;and(2)areaswithoutanadoptedMSCPsubareaplanbutthathaveMSCPsubareaplansinpreparation(NorthCountyandEastCounty).FortheSouthCountyMSCPSubareaPlanarea,asignificantimpactwouldoccuriftheproposedproject
Page 26
County of San Diego Section 2.2. Biological Resources
Draft Final Environmental Impact Report
Agriculture Promotion Project 2.2‐24
February 2017
ICF 0054.15
wasconsideredtoconflictwiththeprovisionsoftheplan.TheSanDiegoMSCPandtheSouthCountyMSCPSubareaPlanwerereviewedwithconsiderationoftheproposedprojectandnoconflictswereidentified.Asdiscussedabove,theproposedprojectwouldpromoteaccessoryagricultureuses,whichcouldresultinthedevelopmentoflandscontainingnaturalhabitat.However,anyclearingofvegetationwouldbesubjecttotheCounty’sGradingandClearingOrdinanceandBiologicalMitigationOrdinance.TheSouthCountyMSCPSubareaPlanincludesanexemptionforagriculturalclearingthatisoutsideofthePre‐ApprovedMitigationArea.However,thecumulativeclearingislimitedto3,000acres,atwhichtimeanyfurtherclearingissubjecttotheBMO.Therefore,whiletheproposedprojectcouldresultinsomeadditionalclearingbeyondthe3,000acres,thisisnotconsideredaconflictwiththeplan,becauseadditionalclearingwouldberequiredtocomplywiththeBMO.AsdiscussedunderSection2.2.3.1,itislikelythatsomeclearingwillbenotbesubjecttoCountyreviewandforthepurposeofthatdiscussion,impactswereconsideredpotentiallysignificantbecausethereisnocertaintyoftheoutcomeofspecificindividualprojectspromotedbytheproposedproject.SuchpotentialindividualimpactsarenotconsideredtorepresentaconflictbetweentheproposedprojectandtheSouthCountyMSCPSubareaPlan.Asaresult,theproposedprojectwouldnotconflictwiththeSouthCountyMSCPSubareaPlan,andimpactswouldbelessthansignificant.
IntheNorthandEastCountyMSCPplanningareas,asignificantimpactwouldoccuriftheproposedprojectwouldprecludeorpreventthepreparationofasubregionalNCCPsuchasthoseunderdevelopmentforthoseareas.DuetotheextentofexistingagricultureintheNorthCountyMSCPplanningarea,thedraftplanplacesimportanceonsomeagriculturelandsforitssupportofwildlifehabitat,foraging,andmovement.Therefore,conversionofactiveagriculturelandstodevelopedlandcouldbeconsideredapotentialconflictwiththeoverallplan.However,suchconversionisnotanticipatedtobesubstantial.Mostagriculturaloperationsrangefromafewacrestodozensofacres.Thedevelopedlandthatsupportsaccessoryusestotheagriculturaloperationsisasmallpercentageofthoselandsand,formanyoftheusespromotedbytheproposedproject,squarefootagelimitationsonthebuildingswouldensurethatlanddisturbanceassociatedwiththemisnotsubstantial.Additionally,oneofthegoalsoftheproposedprojectistosupporttheviabilityofexistingagriculturaloperations,whichwouldaddtotheretentionofagriculturalareasanddiscouragetheirconversiontoresidentialdevelopment.ThedraftNorthCountyplancontainsanagriculturalclearingexemptionsimilartotheSouthCountyplanand,similarly,clearingthatisconsistentwiththeplanandtheCounty’sregulationswouldnotbeconsideredaconflict.AdraftdocumentisnotyetavailablefortheEastCountyarea.UntiltheNorthandEastCountyplansareadopted,theCounty’sClearingandGradingOrdinanceandCEQAcomplianceminimizesthepotentialforbiologicalimpactsthatcouldaffectpreparationoftheplans.AswithSouthCounty,thereisthepotentialforindividualimpactsfromindividualprojects,buttheyarenotanticipatedtoprecludeorpreventthepreparationoftheMSCPsubareaplans.Asaresult,impactswouldbelessthansignificant.
2.2.4 Cumulative Impacts Analysis
Thegeographicscopeofcumulativeimpactanalysisvariesdependingonthetypeofresourcewithpotentialtobeaffected.BiologicalresourcesonacumulativelevelincludeallnativevegetationandhabitattypesinSouthernCaliforniaastheyareallconnectedandintegratedinsomeform.Assuch,thegeographicscopeforthecumulativeanalysisincludestheentireCounty(incorporatedandunincorporatedareas)aswellasthesurroundingcountiesinSouthernCalifornia.Theareawithinthecumulativegeographicscopeforbiologicalresourceshashistoricallyincludedundeveloped
Page 27
County of San Diego Section 2.2. Biological Resources
Draft Final Environmental Impact Report
Agriculture Promotion Project 2.2‐25
February 2017
ICF 0054.15
coastalareasandhasbeentransformedbypastdevelopmentprojectsthatrepresenttheurbanandsuburbansettinginSouthernCalifornia.ManypartsofSouthernCaliforniaareundeveloped,andthereisthepotentialforadditionaldegradationofbiologicalresourceswithinthecumulativestudyarea.
2.2.4.1 Candidate, Sensitive, or Special‐Status Species
Pastprojectshaveresultedincumulativelysignificantimpactsoncandidate,sensitive,orspecial‐statusspeciesthroughouttheCounty,includinglossofhabitat.Inordertoaddresscumulativeimpactsonsensitivespecies,theMSCPwasadoptedtoprotectplants,animals,andtheirhabitatsataregionallevelwhilealsoallowingeconomicactivitywherecompatibleandappropriatetoreducecumulativeeffectsofindividualprojects.AportionoftheprojectislocatedwithintheCounty’sadoptedMSCPSubareaPlan,andanyfutureimpactsonsensitivespeciesfrompresentandfutureprojectswouldbeaddressedandmitigatedatthecumulativelevelaccordingtotherequirementsoftheMSCPSubareaPlan.InprojectareasnotsubjecttotheCounty’sadoptedMSCPSubareaPlan,acomprehensiveregionalplanforhabitatandspeciesconservationdoesnotcurrentlyexist,andincrementalcontributionstotheexistingcumulativelysignificantimpactsidentifiedforcandidate,sensitive,orspecial‐statusspeciescouldoccur.Allpresentandreasonablyforeseeablefutureprojectswouldberequiredtocomplywithapplicablefederalandstateregulations,suchastheFESA,CESA,andNCCP,andmayrequireapprovalsfromUSFWSandCDFW.WithoutacomprehensiveNCCPinplacefortheentireSouthernCaliforniaregion,acumulativelossofhabitatsupportingspecial‐statusplantandwildlifespeciesmayoccur,evenwithimplementationofmitigationattheprojectlevel.FutureprojectswithintheCounty’sadoptedMSCPSubareaPlanwouldbereviewedforMSCPandopenspacecompliancethroughtheministerialgradingchecklistorfuturediscretionaryandCEQAprojectreview;however,thereisnoguaranteethatproject‐specificmitigationmeasureswouldreduceimpactsoncandidate,sensitive,orspecial‐statusspeciestoalevelbelowsignificant.Therefore,past,present,andfutureprojectsinSouthernCaliforniacouldcontinuetoresultinimmitigableimpactsonsensitivespeciesoroccuroutsideofareasthatprotectsensitivespecies.Whenthesignificantproject‐levelimpactonsensitivespecies(ImpactBI‐1)isconsideredatthecumulativelevel,theproject’scontributiontoacumulativeimpactisconsideredtobepotentiallysignificant(ImpactBI‐5).
2.2.4.2 Riparian Habitat or Sensitive Natural Community
Impactsonriparianhabitatandsensitivenaturalcommunitiesfrompastprojectshaveoccurredasaresultofdevelopmentandurbanizationintheregion,andmuchoftheriparianhabitatintheregionhasbeenlostornegativelyaffected.Asaresult,directandindirectlossordegradationwithinthecumulativestudyareahasresultedinacumulativelysignificantimpactonriparianhabitat.Althoughcurrentandfutureprojectswouldberequiredtocomplywithapplicablestateandfederalregulationsprotectingriparianhabitatandsensitivenaturalcommunities,eitherthroughtheministerialgradingprocessordiscretionaryusepermitandCEQAreview,thereisnocomprehensiveNCCPplaninplacefortheentireSouthernCaliforniaregion,andacumulativelossofhabitatsupportingspecial‐statusplantandwildlifespeciesmayoccur,evenaftermitigationhasbeenimplementedonanindividualprojectbasis.Therefore,past,present,andfutureprojectsinSouthernCaliforniacouldcontinuetoresultinimmitigableimpactsonriparianhabitatoroccuroutsideofareasthatprotectriparianspecies.Whenthesignificantproject‐levelimpactonsensitivespecies(ImpactBI‐2)isconsideredatthecumulativelevel,theproject’scontributiontoacumulativeimpactisconsideredtobepotentiallysignificant(ImpactBI‐6).
Page 28
County of San Diego Section 2.2. Biological Resources
Draft Final Environmental Impact Report
Agriculture Promotion Project 2.2‐26
February 2017
ICF 0054.15
2.2.4.3 Federally Protected Wetlands
Impactsonwetlandswithinthecumulativestudyareaforbiologicalresourceshaveoccurredrelatedtopastprojectsand,asaresult,areconsideredtobecumulativelysignificant.Otherprojectsinadjacentjurisdictionswouldberequiredtocomplywithapplicablefederalregulations,suchasSections401and404oftheCWA.However,existingCountyregulationswouldnotensurethatasignificantcumulativeimpactassociatedwithfederallyprotectedwetlandswouldnotoccur(asidentifiedaboveasImpactBI‐3).AllaccessoryagriculturalactivitiesincludedaspartoftheproposedprojectwouldberequiredtocomplywithfederalregulationssuchasSection401and404oftheCWAduringtheministerialgradingprocessordiscretionaryusepermitandCEQAreview,andboththeWPOandtheZoningOrdinanceincludespecialprotectionsforwetlandsthatwouldapplytofederallyprotectedwetlands.Therefore,thelikelihoodofadditionallandclearingactivitiesthatwouldnotbereviewedorregulatedrepresentsapotentiallysignificantimpact.Compliancewiththesepermitrequirementsandregulationswouldavoidsubstantialadverseimpactsonfederallyprotectedwetlands;however,thepotentialforasignificantimpactwouldstillexist.Pastprojectshaveresultedincumulativelysignificantimpactsonwetlands,and,althoughcurrentandfutureprojects,includingtheproposedproject,wouldberequiredtocomplywithexistingfederalwetlandregulations,itispossiblethatapprovaloftheaccessoryagriculturalusesundertheproposedprojectwouldcontributetoacumulativelyconsiderablesignificantimpact(ImpactBI‐7).
2.2.4.4 Wildlife Movement
Pastprojectslocatedinthecumulativestudyareahaveresultedinacumulativelysignificantimpactassociatedwithwildlifemovementcorridorsandnurserysites.Adjacentjurisdictions,includingincorporatedcities,counties,andfederallyandstate‐managedlandswouldberequiredtocomplywithapplicablefederaland/orstateregulations,suchastheCaliforniaNCCPAct.Ifpotentiallysignificantimpactswouldoccurfromparticularcumulativeprojects,thenmitigationmeasureswouldbeimplementedtoreduceimpactstotheextentfeasibleorarationaleastowhymitigationisnotfeasiblewouldbeprovided.However,withoutacomprehensiveNCCPinplaceforthelong‐termprotectionofwildlifemovementcorridorsandnurserysitesfortheentireSouthernCaliforniaregion,acumulativelossofwildlifemovementcorridorsandnurserysiteswouldoccur,evenaftermitigationhasbeenimplementedforindividualprojects.Therefore,asignificantcumulativeimpactassociatedwithwildlifemovementcorridorsandnurserysiteswouldoccur.Theproposedprojectwouldpotentiallyresultintheintroductionofnewstructuresordevelopmentthatcouldfurtherinterferewithwildlifemovementorimpedeuseofnurserysites.Therefore,becausepastprojectshaveresultedinacumulativelysignificantimpactonwildlifemovementandtheproposedprojectcouldsimilarlycontinuetoaffectwildlifemovementthroughouttheunincorporatedCounty,thecontributionoftheprojectwouldbecumulativelyconsiderable(ImpactBI‐8).
2.2.4.5 Habitat Conservation Plans
AsdiscussedaboveinSection2.2.3.5,theproposedprojectwouldnotconflictwiththeSouthCountyMSCPSubareaPlannorwoulditprecludeorpreventthepreparationoftheNorthandEastCountyMSCPplans.Nocumulativeprojectswereidentifiedthat,whenconsideredincombinationwiththeproposedproject,wouldresultinconflict.Therefore,theprojectwouldnothaveaconsiderablecontributiontoacumulativeimpactrelativetotheprovisionsofahabitatconservationplan.
Page 29
County of San Diego Section 2.2. Biological Resources
Draft Final Environmental Impact Report
Agriculture Promotion Project 2.2‐27
February 2017
ICF 0054.15
2.2.5 Significance of Impacts Prior to Mitigation
Theproposedprojectwouldresultinpotentiallysignificantimpactsassociatedwithbiologicalresources,includingspecial‐statusspecies(ImpactsBI‐1,direct/indirect,andBI‐5,cumulative),riparianandothersensitivenaturalcommunities(ImpactsBI‐2,direct/indirect,andBI‐6,cumulative),federallyprotectedwetlands(ImpactsBI‐3,direct/indirect,andBI‐7,cumulative),andwildlifemovementcorridors(ImpactsBI‐4,direct/indirect,andBI‐8,cumulative).Theproposedprojectwouldnotresultinpotentiallysignificantimpactsonlocalpoliciesandordinancesorhabitatconservationplans.
2.2.6 Mitigation Measures
Theproposedprojectconsistsofazoningordinanceamendmentandisnotprojectspecific;therefore,theimpactsofspecificfutureagricultureprojectscannotbedeterminedatthisstage,norcanappropriateproject‐specificmitigationmeasuresbeidentifiedorenforced.However,someoftheseunidentifiedfutureagricultureprojectsmayberequiredtoobtainadiscretionarypermit,suchasaGradingPermit,whichwouldtriggerCEQAreviewofafutureaccessoryagriculturaluseproject.Forsuchprojects,feasiblemitigationmeasurescouldbeincludedinthepermit,thusmakingthemenforceable.Typicalmitigationmeasurestobeimplementedwouldincludeavoidance,preservation,orreplacementofsensitiveresources,habitats,species,ornaturalcommunities.Whereaproposedprojecthasthepotentialtoconflictwithwildlifemovement,localordinances,oranHCP/NCCP/MSCP,mitigationsuchasopenspaceeasements,buffers,andadjacencyguidelines(amongothers)maybeusedtomitigateimpacts.Asaresult,specificimpactsonbiologicalresourceswouldbeanalyzedandmitigatedforthesetypesofby‐rightprojects.
Atthesametime,theremayalsobefutureby‐rightprojectsforwhichrelateddiscretionarypermitsarerequired,butforwhichmitigationwouldnotbefeasible,orforwhichnorelateddiscretionarypermitisrequiredatall(e.g.,wheregradingislessthan200cubicyards,butwhichwouldaffectnativeorfallowland).Forsuchby‐rightprojects,CEQAreviewwouldnotberequired,andappropriatemitigationwouldnotbeimplemented.Asitcannotbeconcludedatthisstagethatimpactsonbiologicalresourcesfromallfutureagricultureprojectsallowedbytheordinanceamendmentwouldbeavoidedormitigated,impactswouldremainsignificantandunmitigated.By‐rightusesmaynotbesubjecttodiscretionaryapproval,and,thus,additionalenvironmentalreviewmaynotbeconducted.Therefore,theseimpactsaresignificantandunmitigatedbecausetherewouldbenoenforcementmechanismtoguaranteeresourceavoidanceorcompliancewithenvironmentalregulations.
2.2.6.1 Candidate, Sensitive, or Special‐Status Species
Theproposedprojectwouldpromotethedevelopmentofaccessoryagriculturefacilities,someofwhichwouldnotneeddiscretionaryreview.Mitigationmeasures(describedbelow)havebeenidentifiedthatwouldreduceimpactsrelatedtocandidate,sensitive,orspecial‐statusspecies,butnotbelowasignificantlevel.
Mitigation Measures
M‐BIO‐1:Duringtheenvironmentalreviewprocessforfuturediscretionarypermitsforaccessoryagriculturaluses,theCountyGuidelinesforDeterminingSignificanceforBiologicalResourcesshallbeapplied.Whenimpactsonbiologicalresourcesaredeterminedtobe
Page 30
County of San Diego Section 2.2. Biological Resources
Draft Final Environmental Impact Report
Agriculture Promotion Project 2.2‐28
February 2017
ICF 0054.15
significant,feasibleandappropriateproject‐specificmitigationmeasuresshallbeincorporatedpursuanttoCEQAandRPO,BMO,andHLPOrdinancerequirements,asapplicable.ExamplesofstandardmitigationmeasureswithintheCountyGuidelinesinclude:avoidanceofsensitiveresources;preservationofhabitat;revegetation;resourcemanagement;andrestrictionsonlighting,runoff,access,and/ornoise.
Infeasible Mitigation Measures
Thefollowingmitigationmeasurewasconsideredinattemptingtoreduceimpactsassociatedwithcandidate,sensitive,orspecial‐statusspecieswithintheCountytobelowalevelofsignificance.However,theCountyhasdeterminedthatthismeasureisinfeasibleforreasonsdescribedasfollows.Therefore,thefollowingmitigationmeasurewouldnotnecessarilybeimplemented.
AdoptMSCPplansforNorthCountyandEastCountythatprovidecoverageforspecial‐statusspeciesaswellasprotectionsforwildlifecorridors,habitatlinkages,andcorehabitatareasinthoseregions.
BecausetheCountyiscurrentlyintheprocessofpreparingsuchplans,thismeasureisfeasibleandattainable.However,theseconservationplansrequireapprovalatthefederalandstatelevels,whichtheCountycannotguaranteewouldoccurpriortoapprovalandimplementationoftheproposedproject.Inaddition,thetimingoftheseprograms(e.g.,MSCPadoptionandimplementation)maynotcoincidewiththeproposedprojectimpactsintheseareas.Therefore,thismeasurecannotbeconsideredfeasiblemitigationfortheproposedproject.
Becausethemeasurelistedabovehasbeenfoundtobeinfeasible,impactswouldremainsignificantandunavoidable.Chapter4,ProjectAlternatives,providesadiscussionofalternativestotheproposedprojectthatwouldresultinsomereducedimpactsassociatedwithcandidate,sensitive,orspecial‐statusspeciesascomparedtotheproposedproject.
2.2.6.2 Riparian Habitat or Sensitive Natural Community
Theproposedprojectwouldallowforthedevelopmentofaccessoryagriculturalfacilities,someofwhichwouldnotneeddiscretionaryreview.MitigationmeasureM‐BIO‐1isalsoapplicabletothisissueandisincorporatedherebyreference.Incorporationofthismitigationmeasure,inadditiontothemitigationmeasurelistedbelow,couldreducepotentiallysignificantimpactsonriparianhabitatandsensitivenaturalcommunities,butnotbelowasignificantlevel.
Mitigation Measures
M‐BIO‐2:RequirethatdevelopmentprojectsobtainCWASection401/404permitsissuedbytheCaliforniaRWQCBandUSACEforapplicablediscretionaryproject‐relateddisturbancesofwatersoftheU.S.and/orassociatedwetlands.AlsocontinuetorequirethatdiscretionaryprojectsobtainFishandGameCodeSection1602StreambedAlterationAgreementsfromCDFWforapplicableproject‐relateddisturbancesofstreambeds.
Infeasible Mitigation Measures
TheinfeasiblemitigationmeasurelistedaboveinSection2.2.6.1,Candidate,Sensitive,orSpecial‐StatusSpecies,wasconsideredinattemptingtoreduceimpactsassociatedwithriparianhabitatandsensitivenaturalcommunitieswithintheCountytobelowalevelofsignificance.However,the
Page 31
County of San Diego Section 2.2. Biological Resources
Draft Final Environmental Impact Report
Agriculture Promotion Project 2.2‐29
February 2017
ICF 0054.15
Countyhasdeterminedthatthismeasureisinfeasibleforreasonsdescribedabove.Therefore,themitigationmeasurewouldnotnecessarilybeimplemented.
Impactswouldremainsignificantandunavoidable.Chapter4,ProjectAlternatives,providesadiscussionofalternativestotheproposedprojectthatwouldresultinsomereducedimpactsassociatedwithriparianhabitatandsensitivenaturalcommunitiesascomparedtotheproposedproject.
2.2.6.3 Federally Protected Wetlands
Theproposedprojectwouldallowforthedevelopmentofaccessoryagriculturalfacilities,someofwhichwouldnotneeddiscretionaryreview.MitigationmeasuresM‐BIO‐1andM‐BIO‐2arealsoapplicabletothisissueandareincorporatedherebyreference.Incorporationofthesemitigationmeasurescouldreducepotentiallysignificantimpactsonfederallyprotectedwetlands,butnotbelowasignificantlevel.
Infeasible Mitigation Measures
TheinfeasiblemitigationmeasurelistedaboveinSection2.2.65.1,Candidate,Sensitive,orSpecial‐StatusSpecies,wasconsideredinattemptingtoreduceimpactsassociatedwithfederallyprotectedwetlandswithintheCountytobelowalevelofsignificance.However,theCountyhasdeterminedthatthismeasureisinfeasibleforreasonsdescribedabove.Therefore,themitigationmeasurewouldnotnecessarilybeimplemented.
Impactswouldremainsignificantandunavoidable.Chapter4,ProjectAlternatives,providesadiscussionofalternativestotheproposedprojectthatwouldresultinsomereducedimpactsassociatedwithfederallyprotectedwetlandsascomparedtotheproposedproject.
2.2.6.4 Wildlife Movement
Theproposedprojectwouldallowforthedevelopmentofaccessoryagriculturalfacilities,someofwhichwouldnotneeddiscretionaryreview.MitigationmeasuresM‐BIO‐1andM‐BIO‐2arealsoapplicabletothisissueandareincorporatedherebyreference.Incorporationofthesemitigationmeasurescouldreducepotentiallysignificantimpactsonwildlifemovementcorridorsandnurserysites,butnotbelowasignificantlevel.
Infeasible Mitigation Measures
TheinfeasiblemitigationmeasurelistedaboveinSection2.2.65.1,Candidate,Sensitive,orSpecial‐StatusSpecies,wasconsideredinattemptingtoreduceimpactsassociatedwithwildlifemovementcorridorsandnurserysiteswithintheCountytobelowalevelofsignificance.However,theCountyhasdeterminedthatthismeasureisinfeasibleforreasonsdescribedabove.Therefore,themitigationmeasurewouldnotnecessarilybeimplemented.
Impactswouldremainsignificantandunavoidable.Chapter4,ProjectAlternatives,providesadiscussionofalternativestotheproposedprojectthatwouldresultinsomereducedimpactsassociatedwithwildlifemovementcorridorsandnurserysitesascomparedtotheproposedproject.
Page 32
County of San Diego Section 2.2. Biological Resources
Draft Final Environmental Impact Report
Agriculture Promotion Project 2.2‐30
February 2017
ICF 0054.15
2.2.7 Conclusion
Althoughimplementationoftheproposedmitigationmeasures,inadditiontocompliancewithapplicableregulations,wouldreducepotentialimpactsassociatedwiththeproposedproject,developmentoffutureaccessoryagriculturaloperationsenabledbyadoptionoftheproposedzoningordinanceamendmentatunspecifiedlocationswithintheprojectareawouldresultinsignificantdirectandcumulativeunmitigatedimpactsoncandidate,sensitive,orspecial‐statusplantorwildlifespecies;riparianhabitatorothersensitivenaturalcommunities;federallyprotectedwetlands;andwildlifemovementcorridorsornurserysites(ImpactsBI‐1,BI‐2,BI‐3,BI‐4,BI‐5,BI‐6,BI‐7,andBI‐8).