-
Section 13
Inquiry Committee meeting held on 27-28 May, 2019 at New
Press Council of India
1. Suo-motu cognizance with regard to murder of Shri Shujaat
Bukhari, Editor-in-Chief, Rising Kashmir. (13/39/18-19).
2. Suo-motu cognizance w.r.t. attack on journalist by the CRPF
in J&K. (13/90/16-17).
3. Complaint of Shri Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, Distt.
Correspondent/ Acreditated Reporter, Dainik Lokmitra against Shri
Prakash Yadav, Conductor, U.P. State Roadways Transport.
(13/159/17-18).
4. Suo-motu cognizance with regard to registering case against
the Puthiya Thalaimurai TV Channel and its Reporter.(
13/50/18-19)
5. Suo-motu cognizance with regard to restriction on Media in
Kerala : Prior permission required to interact with VIPs.
(13/149/18-19)
6. Complaint of Shri Samir Paul, Editor/Publisher, Daily Desher
Katha, Tripura against the BJP Workers and anti-social elements.(
13/80/18-19)
7. Suo-motu cognizance with regard to assault of journalists in
Tripura. (13/173/18-19)
8. Suo-motu cognizance with regard to attack on journalist by
Trinamool Congress activists in West Bengal. (13/9/18-19)
9. Suo-motu cognizance with regard to killing attack on Shri
Pankaj Mishra, Journalist of Rashtriya Sahara in Arwal (Bihar).
(13/79/17-18)
10. Suo-motu cogniznace with regard to murder of two
journalists, Shri Naveen Kumar Singh and Shri Vijay Singh in
Bhojpur (Bihar). (13/193/17-18)
11. Suo-motu cognizance with respect to burning and destroying
copies of “Arunachal Times” (13/106/17-18).
12. Suo-motu cognizance with regard to summons to Editors and
Publisher of “Dawnlit Post” by Itanagar Police. (13/2/18-19)
-
13. Suo-motu cognizance with regard to burning copies of a Daily
Poknapham by BJP workers in Imphal (Manipur). (13/134/17-18)
14. Suo-motu cognizance with regard to assault on
journalist-Shri Biplab Dey by timber smugglers in Meghalaya.
(13/172/17-18).
15. Suo-motu cognizance with regard to attack on journalists at
Ranchi on Jharkhand Foundation Day i.e. 15.11.2018.
(13/128/18-19)
Agenda for the Inquiry Committee-I Meeting scheduled to be held
on 26-27
June, 2019 at Hyderabad.
16. Suo-motu with regard to arrest of Shri G. Bala, Freelance
Cartoonist by Tamil Nadu Police.( 13/121/17-18)
17. Suo-motu cognizance w.r.t. arrest of Shri Mohammad Subhan,
Senior Journalist by the Telangana Police. (13/38/18-19)
18. Complaint of Shri K.R. Subramanian, Reporter, Journal
Juttysuns, Madurai, Tamil Nadu against the Ministry of Information
& Broadcasting & Government of Tamil Nadu.
(13/74/17-18)
19. Complaint of Shri H. Yunas, President, Thendral News Editors
Association, Puducherry against the Government of Puducherry
(13/130/18-19)
20. Complaint of Shri P. Sridhar, Vice-President (Advtg. &
Mktg.), Jagati Publication Ltd. (Sakshi Daily), Hyderabad against
Information & Public Relations Department, Govt. of Andhra
Pradesh. (13/47/18-19)
21. Complaint of Shri B.R. Sharan Kumar, Editor,
www.racingpulse.in, Bangalore against Bangalore Turf Club Ltd.,
Bangalore. (13/164/18-19).
Agenda for the Inquiry Committee-II Meeting scheduled to be held
on 8-9 July, 2019 at
Patna.
22. Suo-motu cognizance with regard to death of Sh. Chandan
Tiwary, Journalist, Aaj in Jharkhand.( 13/125/18-19)
23. Complaint of Shri Pranab Sarkar, Secretary, Tripura
Journalist’s Union, Agartala (West Tripura) against Department of
Information & Cultural Affairs, Government of
Tripura.(13/147/17-18)
http://www.racingpulse.in/
-
24. Complaint of Mizoram Journalists’ Association, Aizawal
(Mizoram) against Assam Police.( 13/31/18-19)
25. Complaint of Shri Vinay Kumar, Reporter, Prabhat Khabar,
Khagaria (Bihar) against Shri Kamal Singh, District Public
Relations (DPRO), Khagaria (Bihar). (13/166/17-18)
26. Suo-motu cognizance with regard to restriction on media from
entering centres of Parliamentary Election Area in Gorakhpur(U.P)
(13/188/17-18)
27. Complaint of Shri Sanjiv Nayan, Editor, Samachar Varsha,
Palamu against SDM, Sadar Medininagar, Palamu. (13/9/17-18)
28. Complaint of Shri Sanjay Kumar Singh, Bureau Chief, Pratah
Kamal, Bihar against Police Station Incharge, Shri C.B
Shukla(13/64/17-18)
29. Complaint of Shri Sanjeev Gupta, Correspondent, Prabhat
Khabar, Katihar through Indian Journalist Association, Patna
against Shri Neeraj Kumar Yadav, MLA, Barari, Katihar and Police
Authorities. (13/47/17-18)
30. Complaint of Shri Ravish Kumar Mani, Reporter, Tarun Mitra,
Patna against police authorities. (13/158/18-19)
-
Press Council of India S. No. 1 F.No.13/39/18-19-PCI. Suo-motu
cognizance with regard to murder of Shri Shujaat Bukhari,
Editor-in-Chief, Rising Kashmir.
Adjudication dated 22.8.2019 Facts The Press Council of India
has come across through various news reports regarding murder of
Shri Shujaat Bukhaari, Editor-in-Chief, Rising Kashmir. It has been
reported in the news that a senior journalist and chief editor of
popular Kashmiri newspaper was killed by unidentified gunmen in a
drive by shooting in Srinagar that put an already tense State on
edge and led Chief Minister of J&K, Ms. Mehbooba Mufti to
describe the attack as a “new low for terrorism”. A journalist for
three decades, he had worked for 15 years at The Hindu and was
known in the state and the rest of the country as a important
Kashmiri voice. Shri Bukhari was an advocate of a peaceful
resolution of the Kashmir issue and was instrumental in organising
several conferences involving former Diplomats and Generals from
India and Pakistan. Shri Bukhari was a contributor to Frontline
magazine. While taking suo-motu cognizance of the matter, a Report
on facts of the case was called for from the Government of Jammu
& Kashmir on 15.6.2018. Hon’ble Chairman also constituted a
Fact Finding Committee comprising of PCI’s Members, Shri Parvat
Kumar Dash, Shri Ashok Upadhyay and Dr. (Prof.) Sushma Yadav to
inquire into the matter and submit report. Report of the Fact
Finding Committee The Fact Finding Committee visited Jammu &
Kashmir and interacted with various media organizations and family
of Shri Shujaat Bukhari and felt that the security lapse was one of
the major causes of the murder. The festival of Eid was near and
the enforcement of security was reduced. When Shri Bukhari was
attacked by assailants, the number of security enforcement was less
in comparison to other days. Shri Bukhari was provided five
security personnel but Shri Bukhari himself permitted three
security personnel to avail leave. When the incident occurred there
were only two security personnel with Shri Bukhari. One personnel
was driving the car and another was giving him security cover.
Three assailants rushed towards the car and fired from
sophisticated weapons from three sides. The Fact Finding Committee
has recommended that-
1. The administration should take all necessary steps to find
out and nab the killers of Shri Shujaat Bukhari.
2. The Security arrangements at Press Enclave should be beefed
up. 3. The administration and legislature should seriously consider
to enact a special
law for the safety of journalists, on the lines of one enacted
by the Govt. of Maharashtra.
4. In case of any disputes on publisher matters, the
administration should approach the PCI instead of writing for
sources and for remedial measures, directly to the Media House.
5. The Information & Public Relations Department (I&PRD)
should be in touch with the journalists and media houses more
regularly and should interact with them more often.
6. The I&PRD should educate the journalists working on field
through Group Meeting, Seminars and workshops regarding the Norms
of Journalistic
-
Conduct, enacted by the PCI and all Media Houses should be
supplied with the photocopies of the same at the earliest.
7. The I&PRD should convene a meeting of journalist Unions
immediately and the reporters should be made aware of the Norms of
Journalistic Conduct, specially at the time of Conflict Reporting
or reporting from the area of Operations.
8. The Media Houses should categorically be told to supply
specific dress/jacket to the working journalists with Media/Press
embosses on it, while on the field.
9. The administration should react immediately to the request
for protection by a journalist after assessing the quantum of the
thrat and necessity.
10. The State Working Journalists Welfare Fund Committee should
be reconstituted immediately, having representation from all
journalist Unions. More minimum Welfare Measures should be
introduced as soon as possible to gain over the goodwill of the
working journalist, such as below: a) Family Health Insurance
Scheme b) Speedy disposal of accreditation applications c) More
lenient accreditation policy. d) Free travel passes in State
Transport Buses to the accreditated journalists. e) Free Medical
Treatment for all working journalist.
The Report submitted by the Committee was placed before the
Council in its meeting held on 26.9.2018 at New Delhi and the
Council while accepting the Report directed the Secretariat to
forward it to the appropriate authority for necessary action.
Accordingly, the Report was forwarded to the Government of J&K
on 19.11.2018 for necessary action. Report filed by Superintendent
of Police, Srinagar
The Superintendent of Police, City East Zone, Srinagar vide his
status report dated Nil has informed that an FIR No.51/2018 dated
14.6.2018 was registered in Police Station Kothibagh, Srinagar
against five accused namely (i) Zubair Qayoom Bhat (ii) Muzafar
Ahmad Bhat (iii) Azad Ahmad Malik @ Dadda (iv) Naveed Jat and (v)
Sheikh Sajad Gul. It has been stated that a Special Investigation
Team was constituted by Inspector General of Police, Kashmir. The
Accused No.1 has been arrested on 15.6.2018 and challaned on
25.9.2018 before the Hon’ble Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate,
Srinagar and is presently lodged in Central Jail, Srinagar. It has
been further stated that the accused, Naveed Jat was killed in an
encounter at Chadoora Budgam on 28.11.2018 and another accused Azad
Ahmad was killed in encounter at Takiya Maqsood Shah, Bijbehara
Anantnag on 23.11.2018. It is further reported that accused Shri
Sheikh Sajad Gul is presently in Pakistan. It has been also stated
that the main accused Muzaffar Ahmad Bhat is to be arrested by the
concerned SHO and other sister agencies.
Report of the Inquiry Committee The matter came up for hearing
before the Inquiry Committee on 27.5.2019 at
New Delhi. Murder of Mr. Shujaat Bukhari, Editor-in-Chief of
Rising Kashmir is the subject matter of this suo motu inquiry. In
view of the gravity of the matter, the Council appointed a Fact
Finding Committee. The Committee so appointed visited Srinagar and
met people from different walks of life and submitted its
report.
The observations of the Committee are as under:
-
“While interacting with the media organisation, it was very much
visible that every journalist was living in fear. In fact, many of
them complained that the local security agencies are not providing
sufficient security cover to the journalists. In this
circumstances, they are finding it difficult to work freely.
After the discussion with the security officials, PCI team felt
that there should be security review and concerned journalist must
be consulted and taken into confidence.”
The Inquiry Committee has perused the reply filed by the
respondent. Mr. Zia-Ul-Rehman, Senior Prosecuting Officer appeared
on behalf of the State Government and states that the investigation
in respect of murder of Mr. Bhukari will be concluded shortly.
The Inquiry Committee directs that a copy of the report of the
Sub-Committee be forwarded to the Government of Jammu & Kashmir
for taking such steps as are necessary, so as to ensure that the
journalists discharge their legitimate journalistic activity
without any impediment.
The Inquiry Committee drops the proceeding with the observation
aforesaid.
Held The Press Council on consideration of records of the case
and Report of the Inquiry Committee accepts reasons, findings and
adopts the Report of the Committee and decides to drop the
proceedings in the matter.
-
Press Council of India
S.No. 2 File No.13/90/16-17-PCI.
Suo-Motu cognizance with regard to attack on journalists by the
CRPF in Jammu & Kashmir.
Adjudication dated 22.8.2019
Facts:
Shri K. Amarnath, Former Member, PCI vide email dated 10.8.2016
drew the attention of the Council towards attack on journalist by
the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) in Jammu & Kashmir.
According to him, the CRPF jawans allegedly beaten several
photo-journalists at Semthan Bijerbehara in Anantnag district in
Kashmir while covering protest there as would be evident from a
delayed report appearing in some Srinagar based newspapers and
Hindustan Times. Shri Amarnath has informed that Shri
Muneeb-Ul-Islam, who works with Kashmir Reader and Daily Roshni,
alleged that the CRPF men also used him as a shield. Shri Islam
added that first the CRPF troopers thrashed him and then put him
ahead of them so that he gets hit by stones. As per the reports,
the photo journalists went there to cover an encounter between the
CRPF and some militants holed up at a plant nursery. Some youth
came out in support of the militants and started throwing stones at
the CRPF men. The security force used the photo-journalists as
shields against the stones. Shri Amarnath has alleged that the
action of the CRPF is an attack on the freedom of press and
requested the Council to take suo-motu cognizance of the case and
take suitable steps urgently to save the journalists.
A Report on facts of the case was called for from the Director
General, CRPF, New Delhi and the Special Director General, CRPF,
Jammu on 12.8.2016.
Reply of Director General dated 23.9.2016 & 10.7.2017, CRPF,
New Delhi
In response to Council’s letter dated 12.8.2016, Shri Yogyan
Singh, DIG (Ops-II), Directorate General, CRPF, New Delhi vide his
report dated 23.9.2016 submitted that the subject matter was
enquired and it has emerged that no person, present at site i.e.
Semthan, Bijebehara in Anantnag district of J&K,
misbehaved/beaten by the CRPF troops deployed in the area to
control the violent mob. According to the respondent, the enquiry
further revealed that none of them disclosed their identity that
they are from press or media while the troops were controlling the
violent mob of stone pelters. The matter was also enquired from the
concerned police station i.e. Bijbehara and they have also denied
and confirmed that no such incident of attack on journalist took
place on 8.8.2016 and no complaint/FIR was lodged in this regard.
He has submitted that the CRPF always strives to help the public
whenever they are in need and is proficient enough to control such
violent agitation. He has stated that the allegations levelled by
the photo journalists against CRPF are unfounded.
Another reply dated 10.7.2017 on behalf of the respondent has
been filed by Shri Yogyan Singh, DIGP (Ops-ii), Dte. Genl., CRPF,
New Delhi, wherein,he submitted that allegations levelled in the
complaint are false and vexatious as the same are not supported by
substantial evidence and have been levelled only with a view to
tarnish the image of the members of the CRPF. The matter was
enquired and it has emerged that none of the persons, as alleged,
was present at the relevant time.
-
He further submitted that as far as beating of journalist is
concerned, it appears to be an attempt to exploit a non-existent
issue by the concerned journalist and at the same time defame the
force. It is the onus of the journalist to prove as to how and when
the incident took place and who all were involved in the matter and
why proper channel was not used to bring the culprit to book for
the offence. He has further submitted that the matter is also
enquired from the Bijbehara Police station, who in turn denied and
confirmed that no such incident of attack on journalist took place
on 8.8.2016. In view of the same, he requested the Council to
dismiss the matter.
Communication dated 1.9.2016 received from CRPF
A copy of Letter dated 1.9.2016, addressed to the Commandant 90
BN.,CRPF, by the SHO, Semthan Bijerbehara, J&K, has been filed
by the CRPF before the Inquiry Committee at the time of hearing
held on 12.7.2017. It states that on 8.8.2016 protests erupted at
village Semthan and a case was registered U/S 307,147,148,149,
332,341,427,152 in Police Station Bijerbehara and the investigation
of the case is in process. No report of beating up of the photo
journalists at Semthan was reported to Police Station.
A copy of the letter has been forwarded to the concerned
journalist on 11.8.2017
Report of Commandant-40 Battalion
Shri Ashu Shukla, Commandant-40 Battalion, Investigating
Officer, filed a report in journalist’s case in which he submitted
that Shri K. Amarnath, Member, PCI, did not give his statement in
this matter even after mailing him on 7.9.2017. He further
submitted that the concerned journalist, Shri Muneeb-Ul-Islam,
neither filed any FIR in this regard nor did he present any medical
report of his treatment. He submitted that the journalist could
apprise neither name nor CRPF unit of the man who allegedly
assaulted him. The journalist presented a photograph which is not
apparent and does not have any relation with the matter. The S.H.O
of Police Station Brijbehara, Anantnag, through his letter no.
1547/5A/PSB/2016, which is addressed to Commandant-90 Battalion,
apprised that no complaint related to assault on journalist was
filed on 8.8.2016. he further submitted that according to Shri
Shivalik Prasad’s letter dated 28.8.2016, responsible for deploying
CRPF men, there was no deployment of CRPF men at Semthan on
8.8.2016. Therefore, it is clear from the above fact that
journalist statement of using him as a shield against stone pelting
is baseless and all have been done to tarnish the image of the
CRPF.
Written Statement of Shri Muneeb-Ul-Islam
Shri Muneeb-Ul-Islam, Photo Journalist, Roshni Daily in his
statement before Shri Ashu Shukla, Commandant-40 Battalion, CRPF,
on 12.9.2017 submitted that on 8.8.2016, when he along with his
friends reached Bribehara, they came across some information that
few people were pelting stone on CRPF men. He further stated that
when they moved towards Semthan, few CRPF men stopped them citing
of stone pelting there. Meanwhile, Shri Muneeb-Ul-Islam and his
friends captured some photos of the scene but CRPF men asked them
to delete the pictures. He further submitted that when he was about
to delete photos, a CRPF man started assaulting him and used as
shields against the stones. Later, some CRPF men saved him and the
matter was apprised to the Police Commissioner of J&K. He
stated that his friends
-
Mohammad Aabid and Shri Shafafat Meer were with him at the time
of the attack but he is not able to contact Mohammad Aabid.
Communication of Shri Muneeb-Ul-Haque
Shri Muneeb-Ul-Haque, Editor in Chief, The Varmul Post, vide
email dated 19.9.2017 apprised the Secretariat about the situation
taking place between Sopore Police authorities and Varmul Post
Journalist. He submitted that the issue of manhandling with one of
his photojournalists was taken up by the local journalists’ body
with Police Officials of Sopore. He further thanked PCI for its
involvement and strong support which has been critical in their
discussion with Police Officials. As a result of these discussions,
the situation was resolved amicably and in good faith. The Police
also assured the journalists’ body of being diligent in future. He
has requested the Council that the case should be deemed as
resolved by Hon’ble PCI so that the Press and Police can work
together for the betterment of the society.
The I.C. vide its Order dated 12.7.2018 had directed to hold an
Inquiry in which version of the concerned journalists be recorded
with respect to assault by the men of CRPF. The I.C. did not
approve the Report submitted earlier on the ground that during the
course of Inquiry the victim journalist was not examined.
Thereafter it seems that the photo-journalists who were allegedly
assaulted have been examined and the Commandant of the CRPF who had
examined those journalists has come to a conclusion. Although, the
same is on record but it has not been endorsed by any Senior
Officer of the Force.
Communication dated 19.7.2018 received from DIG, CRPF
Shri Dhiraj Kumar, DIG (Ops-II), Dte, CRPF vide communication
dated 19.7.2018 has reiterated the facts earlier submitted by the
CRPF. He further informed that Shri Muneeb-ul-Islam deposed his
statement before the inquiry Officer while Shri Kamran Yusuf did
not turn up. Another journalist Shaffat Mir, whose name is not in
the complaint, also deposed his statement in the inquiry. No
evidence has been put forth by any of them in support of the
allegations. The Inquiry Officer has concluded that in the absence
of any evidence it cannot be established that any such incident
took place on 8.8.2016. In view of the above, the allegations
levelled by the photo journalists against CRPF are unfounded and
denied. Further, he has requested to close the proceedings in the
matter.
The Inquiry Committee vide its further Order dated 26.6.2018,
22.10.2018 and 14.2.2019 called upon the Director General of the
CRPF to examine the said report and file its independent findings
to the Inquiry Committee.
Report dated 6.3.2019 filed by the Director General of the
CRPF
Shri Rajeev Rai Bhatnagar, Director General, CRPF vide letter
dated 6.3.2019 has forwarded a Report in the matter. He submitted
that to examine the veracity of the case, a field Commandant of 40
Bn., CRPF was detailed to enquire into the matter in detail.
Accordingly, Commandant 40 Bn CRPF examined the complainants
through the troops present at deployed site/area i.e. Semthan,
Bijbehara, Anantnag (J&K) and also recorded the statements of
the complainants. As per fact finding probe, it has emerged that
CRPF troops were deployed at Semthan, Bijbehara, Anantnag (J&K)
to control the violent mob of stone pelters. During their duty no
photo-journalists approached the troops by displaying their
-
identity that they are photo-journalists. The version of the
complainants has also been recorded during the enquiry. After
taking all the statements into account the fact that
photo-journalist Mr. Muneeb-Ul-Islam and Mr. Kamran Yusuf have been
beaten/misbehaved by CRPF could not be established. Thus, the
allegations levelled by the photo-journalists Mr. Muneeb-Ul-Islam
and Mr. Kamran Yusuf against CRPF are not substantiated and
unfounded in the enquiry report.
A copy each of the aforesaid Report has been forwarded to Mr.
Muneeb-Ul-Islam, Photo Journalist and Shri K. Amarnath, (currently
Former Member), PCI for information on 15.3.2019 and 19.3.2019
respectively. Report of the Inquiry Committee
The matter came up for hearing before the Inquiry Committee on
27.5.2019 at New Delhi. Shri K. Amarnath, Former Member, PCI
appeared on behalf of concerned photo journalists while Shri Anil
Thakur, Assistant Commandant, CRPF along with Shri Dharmendra Kumar
Pandey and Shri Baban Sharma, Advocates represented the respondent
authority (CRPF).
The alleged assault on a journalist by the men of the CRPF is
the subject matter of this suo motu inquiry.
Earlier, the Director General of CRPF was directed to record its
independent finding. The Director General has done so and affirmed
the finding. The Inquiry Committee does not find any material to
take a different view.
Accordingly, the Inquiry Committee drops the proceedings.
Held The Press Council on consideration of records of the case
and Report of the
Inquiry Committee accepts reasons, findings and adopts the
Report of the Committee and decides to drop the proceedings.
-
Press Council of India
S.No. 3 File No.13/159/17-18-PCI.
Complainant Respondents
Shri Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, The Assistant Regional
Manager,
District Correspondent, U.P. State Road Transport
Dainik Lokmitra, Corporation,
Faizabad (U.P.). Faizabad (U.P.)
The Assistant Regional Manager,
U.P. State Road Transport
Corporation, Akbarpur,
Faizabad (U.P.)
Shri Prakash Yadav, Bus Conductor, U.P. State Road Transport,
Corporation, Faizabad (U.P.)
Adjudication dated 22.8.2019
Facts
This complaint dated 1.11.2017 has been filed by Shri Pradeep
Kumar Srivastava, District Correspondent/Accredited Journalist,
Dainik Lokmitra, Faizabad (U.P.) against Shri Prakash Yadav, Bus
Conductor, U.P. State Road Transport Corporation (UPSRTC) for
allegedly misbehaving and snatching his election pass. According to
the complainant, when he boarded the bus from Faizabad Depot. to
Bakarganj , the bus conductor, Shri Prakash Yadav asked him to take
bus ticket for the journey. On being asked for the ticket,
complainant showed his accreditation card to the conductor. The
conductor termed the complainant “fake journalist” and asked him to
pay half fare for the journey else threatened to get him down from
the bus. The complainant alleged that the conductor misbehaved with
him and also snatched his assembly election pass. The complainant
wrote against the behaviour of conductor to the District
Magistrate, Faizabad Superintendent of Police, Faizabad and the
Assistant Regional Manager, U.P. Roadways Transport Corporation,
Faizabad on 13.6.2017. On the direction of the Assistant Regional
Manager, UPSRTC, Faizabad, the matter was investigated by the
Assistant Regional Manager, Akbarpur, Faizabad. The complainant
informed that the Bus-Conductor was directed to appear before the
Assistant Regional Manager, Akbarpur, Faizabad vide his letters
dated 22.6.2017, 10.7.2017, 21.7.2017, 14.8.2017, 31.8.2017 and
12.9.2017 but he did not appear. While levelling the allegations of
threatening and pressurising for compromise against the
Bus-Conductor, the complainant has requested the Council to take
necessary action in the matter.
-
A copy of the complaint was forwarded to the Assistant Regional
Manager, UPSRTC, Faizabad and the Assistant Regional Manager,
UPSRTC, Akbarpur on 8.1.2018 for taking necessary action in the
matter under intimation to the Council.
Reply of Assistant Regional Manager, Akbarpur
The Assistant Regional Manager, U.P. State Road Transport
Corporation, Akbarpur vide his reply dated 23.1.2018 informed that
an investigation report in the matter was sent to the
Magistrate/Assistant Regional Manger, Faizabad and further
necessary action would have been done at their level.
Reply of Assistant Regional Manager, Faizabad
The Assistant Regional Manager, U.P. State Road Transport
Corporation, Faizabad vide his letter dated 30.1.2018 informed that
the complaint filed against Shri Prakash Yadav, Conductor was
investigated by the Assistant Regional Manager, Akbarpur and as per
report submitted by him, allegation levelled against the Conductor
could not be proved. Accordingly, the complaint was dismissed vide
their Office Order No.83 dated 9.1.2018.
Report filed by Assistant Regional Manager, Akbarpur
The Assistant Regional Manager, Akbarpur vide letter dated
15.10.2018 filed a report in the matter. He submitted that the
matter was investigated in six dates. The complainant along with
his witness appeared before the Regional Manager only on 19.9.2018
and recorded his statements. Thereafter, the complainant did not
choose to appear in next four meetings. Therefore, as per rules and
regulations, the matter was investigated and a Report dated
27.10.2017 was sent to the D.M./Assistant Regional Manager,
Faizabad, Faizabad Depot. The report revealed that a dispute was
ensued between conductor and the complainant which can be confirmed
by passengers and driver of the bus. The Report further states that
it is not confirmed as to who started argument as the complainant
has not chosen to appear in four consecutive dates of
investigation. Therefore, the allegations against the conductor
could not be proved.
A copy of the said Report was forwarded to the complainant vide
Council’s letter dated 4.12.2018.
Communication received from the complainant
The complainant, Shri Pradeep Kumar Shrivastava vide letter
dated 23.10.2018 has filed his submission. In his submission, he
has stated that the Officers of the Department are trying to save
their employee. He has further submitted that all the witnesses
have accepted the fact that the conductor was asking the
complainant to show Bus pass and other identity card. The
complainant has submitted that he has not used offensive words
against the conductor.
Report dated 8.2.2019 filed by Assistant Regional Manager,
Akbarpur
The Regional Manager, Akbarpur forwarded a Report dated 8.2.2019
which had been filed earlier also. While reiterting the Report, he
submitted that six dates - 28.6.2017,19.7.2017, 4.8.2017,
28.8.2017, 8.9.2017 and 20.9.2017 were fixed to investigate the
matter. However, the complainant appeared in two dates only.
-
Accordinlgy, the matter was investigated and concluded Report
No. 7158 dated 27.10.2017 was sent to the Regional Manager,
Faizabad. He further submitted that the complainant was not happy
with the investigation and furnished various allegations on the
Officers who were investigating the matter. He submitted that due
to his official work, he was unable to attend meeting on
14.2.2019.
Letter dated 18.4.2019 received from Assistant Regional Manager,
Faizabad Depot
The Assistant Regional Manager, Faizabad Depot, U.P. State
Roadways Transport Corporation, U.P. vide letter dated 18.4.2019
submitted that the Assistant Regional Manager, Akbarpur, U.P had
forwarded a copy of the Order passed by Inquiry Committee in its
meeting held on 15.2.2019 to his Office on 9.4.2019 . He further
submitted that he was not present on earlier hearings as he had not
received any communication from the Council.
It is submitted that the Council had issued Notice for hearing,
Summons to the respondent to appear before Inquiry Committee by
Regd. Post. The same have not been received back by the
Secretariat.
Report of the Inquiry Committee The matter came up for hearing
before the Inquiry Committee on 27.05.2019
at New Delhi.
Despite service of notice, the complainant has not chosen to
appear. Mr. Kamal Ahmed, Mr. Nand Kishore Chaudhary and Shri
Prakash Yadav are present. The Inquiry Committee has perused the
complaint and all connected papers. Mr. Prakash Yadav, the
concerned Bus Conductor accepts his mistake and assures that in
future, he will not commit any such mistake. He expresses regret
for the act done by him. In view of the aforesaid, the Inquiry
Committee is not inclined to proceed in the matter any further.
The Inquiry Committee, accordingly, recommends for disposal of
the complaint.
Held The Press Council on consideration of records of the case
and Report of the
Inquiry Committee accepts reasons, findings and adopts the
Report of the Committee and decides to dispose of the
complaint.
-
Press Council of India
S. No.4 F.No.13/50/18-19-PCI.
Suo-motu cognizance with regard to registering case against the
PUTHIYA THALAIMURAI TV Channel and its Reporter in Tamil Nadu.
Adjudication dated 22.8.2019 Facts
The Journalists of Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu addressed an undated
letter to
Hon’ble Chief Justice of India along with an endorsement to
Press Council of India intimating that on 8.6.2018 a debate was
organized by PUTHIYA THALAIMURAI TV CHANNEL and when few speakers
opposing the views of particular party, a group from the audience
started to abuse the speakers in filthy words and raised slogans in
obscene language and rushed towards the podium to attack them
physically. The police officials initially did not try to prevent
the mischief-mongers from disturbing the peaceful programme. The
leader of the unruly mob, who also took part as one of the
debaters, also encouraged the mischief-makers by conduct and speech
and instigated them to carry out their sinister move. Thus after
the situation became grim and alarming, the police intervened and
prevented the unruly gang from indulging in physical attack on the
speakers who boldly registered their voice of dissent. It has been
further informed that due to their misbehaviour, the programme came
to a grinding halt and the audience were left with no other option
than leaving the hall in utter displeasure over the impatient and
rude conduct of the persons who disturbed the program in pursuance
of their pre-plan. It has been informed that the police on the
behest of one of the political parties forced the owner of the hall
to prefer a false complaint against “PUTHIYA THALIMURAI”TV CHANNEL
and its Coimbatore Bureau Reporter, Shri Suresh Kumar and succeeded
in registering two separate cases. The case registered in Peelamedu
police station in Cr.no.964/2018, under Sections 153A, 505(1)(b) of
IPC and Section 3(1) of (Tamil Nadu prevention of public property
damage Act) is against the TV Channel organized the show and its
staff Shri Suresh Kumar. Video was taken of the entire proceedings
and it is evident from the above that the TV channel and its
employee had nothing to do with the alleged offences. Registering a
case on the basis of a false complaint is evidently an attack on
freedom of expression guaranteed by the constitution. While taking
suo-motu cognizance of the matter, Notices for Statement in Reply
were issued to the Government of Tamil Nadu on 6.7.2018 followed by
a reminder dated 4.9.2018. Reply filed by the Inspector of Police,
Coimbatore
Shri V.Selvaraj, Inspector of Police, Intelligence Section,
Office of the Commissioner of Police, Coimbatore City vide Report
dated 25.5.2019 has
-
submitted that two FIRs had been lodged at E-2, Peelamedu Police
Station against (i) Mr. Sureshkumar, Correspondent of Puthiya
Thalaimurai (under Sections 153(A), 505(1) (b) of IPC)and (ii)
Puthiya Thalaimurai Television Channel (under Sections 153(A),
505(1) (b) of IPC also under Section 3(1) of Tamil Nadu Public
Property Prevention and Damages of Loss, Act 1992) by one Shri
Anandakumar, Manager of M/s. SNR Sons Charitable Trust, also
incharge of the Auditorium attached to Marriage Hall. The Report
states that both the accused stated above had sought permission to
conduct a debate show name “ VATTA MESAI VIVADHAM” (Round Table
Debate) in the SNR Auditorium Hall involving student society. The
accused requested the Institution to provide Auditorium, but the
SNR Sons Charitable Trust Authorities were not informed either
directly or indirectly by the Puthiya Thalaimurai TV Channel
authorities that there shall be participation of political
personalities in the discussion and it will be open to the public
audience. The SNR Sons Charitable Trust Authorities don’t allow any
debates involving political parties. On that score the said
permission was granted to the Puthiya Thalaimurai TV Channel.
As per the plan, the Anchor conducted the program on 8.6.2018.
During the course of the heated debate, Mr. Ameer (Film Director)
had vehemently quoted references to the Tuticorin Firings, Ayodhya
Issues, Sensitive Murder of Sasikumar that ended in riot etc. which
made the other group shout against him. On the other hand, a group
encouraged his speech, resulting in personal attacks among the
gatherings. The Police deployed there with their hectic efforts
somehow controlled such tense situation. Subsequently, the SNR Sons
Charitable Trust lodged a written complaint. The legitimate
investigation and examination of witness made out a definite prima
facie case against Puthiya Thalaimurai Television Channel and its
founder Shri Sathyanarayanan. Both the registered case are pending
before Hon’ble Judicial Magistrate. Meanwhile the accused
petitioners sought anticipatory bail. Moreover, the management of
Puthiya Thalaimurai Television Channel has approached the Hon’ble
High Court of Judicature at Madras seeking to quash the petition.
Such quash petition is presently pending before the Court of law.
The Inspector of Police has requested the Council to drop the
proceeding in the matter.
Report of the Inquiry Committee The matter came up for hearing
before the Inquiry Committee on 27.5.2019
at New Delhi. Shri T.A. Selvaraj, Shri Rajiv M. Roy, Advocates
and Shri V. Selvaraj, Inspector of Police represented the Govt. of
Tamil Nadu. Shri V. Venkatesan and Shri B. Sudhir Kumar, Advocates
represented the Puthiya Thalaimurai Television Channel.
Physical violence during the debate of a news channel is the
subject matter of this suo-motu inquiry.
It is common ground that the concerned news channel has
approached the High Court for quashing of the prosecution. As the
subject matter of the inquiry is subjudice before the Court of law,
the Inquiry Committee is not inclined to proceed in the matter any
further.
The Inquiry Committee, accordingly, recommends for disposal of
the complaint.
-
Held The Press Council on consideration of records of the case
and Report of the Inquiry Committee accepts reasons, findings and
adopts the Report of the Committee and decides to dispose of the
complaint being sub-judice.
-
Press Council of India
S. No.5 F.No.13/149/18-19-PCI.
Suo-motu cognizance with regard to restriction on Media in
Kerala : Prior permission required to interact with VIPs
Adjudication dated 22.8.2019 Facts
The Press Council of India came across a news report appeared in
the Mathrubhumi under the caption “Media restriction in Kerala;
prior permission required to interact with VIPs”. It is reported in
the impugned news report that the government issued an order
imposing strict restriction on media interaction with Chief
Minister, other ministers and celebrities within the secretariat
and on public venues outside. The order was issued by the
Additional Chief Secretary (Home), Shri Subrata Biswas. The media
has been restricted forcefully from taking responses from the Chief
Minister and other ministers at public events. The media will be
allowed to interact with VIPs only if they get prior appointments.
The media will be allowed to enter only those places determined by
the Public Relations Department (PRD) at the event venues.
While taking suo-motu cognizance of the matter, Notices for
Statement in Reply were issued to the Government of Kerala on
4.1.2019 followed by reminder dated 8.4.2019. Report filed by Govt.
of Kerala The Director incharge of Information & Public
Relations Department, Thiruvananthapuram, Govt. of Kerala vide
Report dated 23.5.2019 submitted that the Govt. of Kerala has
neither any intention to impose restrictions on media interaction
with Chief Minister, other Ministers and celebrities within the
Secretariat or on public venues outside nor issued any order to
that effect. The Report further states that a circular, not a Govt.
Order for steamlining the interation of media with the Chief
Minister, Cabinet Ministers and Govt. officials was issued to
ensure better coordination with media. Later, based on protests
from various corners, Govt. re-examined the matter and have issued
modified guidelines. The present circular is an earnest effort to
avert situation so that all the media are provided with equal and
fair opportunities to get Govt. information and News.
Report of the Inquiry Committee
The matter came up for hearing before the Inquiry Committee on
27.5.2019 at New Delhi. Mr. N.P. Santhosh and Ms. Thomas appeared
on behalf of the Govt. of Kerala and stated that accredited
journalists are allowed entry without any pass to collect
information from the Secretariat. Those journalists, who do not
have the accreditation card are also allowed entry after obtaining
the entry pass.
-
In view of the aforesaid statement, the Inquiry Committee is not
inclined to proceed in the matter any further and recommends for
disposal of the complaint.
Held The Press Council on consideration of records of the case
and Report of the Inquiry Committee accepts reasons, findings and
adopts the Report of the Committee and decides to dispose of the
complaint.
-
Press Council of India
S. No.6 F.No.13/80/18-19-PCI.
Complainant Respondent
Shri Samir Paul, The Chief Secretary, Editor/Publisher,
Government of Tripura,
Daily Desher Katha, Agartala. - Agartala (Tripura)
The Secretary, Home (Police) Department,
Government of Tripura, Agartala.
The Director General of Police,
Tripura, Agartala.
Adjudication dated 22.8.2019
Facts:
This complaint dated 29.6.2018 has been filed by Shri Samir
Paul, Editor/Publisher, Daily Desher Katha, Agartala, Tripura
against the workers of Bhartiya Janta Party (BJP) and anti-social
elements for allegedly creating hurdle in distribution of his
newspaper. According to the complainant, Daily Desher Katha was
initially owned by Tripura State Committee, CPI(M). In the year
2012 ownership of the newspaper has been changed and since then it
is being published by Daily Desher Katha Society. The complainant
has further stated that the latest Tripura Legislative Assembly
election were held in February 18 last and counting of votes took
place on March 3, 2018. In the election, BJP and its electoral ally
Indegenous People’s Front of Tripura (IPFT) secured majority
unseating CPI(M) led Left Front Govt. which was running the
Government since 1993 continuously. Since declaration of
Legislative Assembly election results, workers and supporters of
BJP captured all the motor transport depots in state capital
Agartala and all the motor transport depots in the Districts and
Sub-Divisions of the State. According to the complainant, BJP
workers and supporters running the motor transport depots with a
view to silence the Daily Desher Katha resorted to fascistic attack
at the instance of their leadership. They have illegally banned his
newspaper and refusing to carry packets of the newspaper in
different destination of the State. As a result, thousands of
subscribers of his newspaper have been deprived of their
fundamental right of information that they were getting through his
newspaper. The complainant has further stated that in the capital
town Agartala and other towns, BJP workers threatening hawkers not
to distribute his newspaper. The complainant has stated that the
Tripura Railway network is very small and people of the State
depends upon motor transport as the mode of communication. The BJP
workers and supporters creates hurdle and prevent them to carry,
distribution and sale of aforesaid newspaper due to which as many
as 447 number of agencies have closed and leading to reduction in
distribution
-
and sale of 43,386 number of copies daily. Due to this act of
the respondents, the income of more than 1000 people, who are
dependent upon agency’s commission and hawkers wages, have been
stopped. Thus large numbers of people have lost their livelihood.
The complainant has submitted that on May 8, 2018 his newspaper
agency’s packet of Teliamura containing 105 copies was snatched by
BJP Workers near Karailong Higher Secondary School while the packet
was being taken from Teliamura Rail Station to Sub Divisional
CPI(M) office for distribution. According to the complainant, BJP
workers forced Shri Swapan Dey, agent of his newspaper to burn all
the copies of newspaper and he burnt copies under death threat. FIR
was lodged in this regard to Teliamura police station by the then
Sub Divisional Secretary. The complainant also submitted that one
new agency was opened with the help of a motor driver at Mohanpur
in West Tripura District secretly. Local BJP MLA and the Minister
Incharge of Law and Education Sri Ratan Lal Nath called the motor
driver and asked him to stop carrying packets of his paper and
threatened him that otherwise his dead body will be found. He was
also threatened by the Minister not to make any complaint with the
police.
The complainant requested the Council that fundamental rights
guaranteed under Articles 14, 19(a)(a), 19(a)(g) and right under
Articles 300A be protected by directing the State Government to
ensure safe distribution and selling of the newspaper freely all
over the state without any obstruction from any quarter including
the supporter of party in power and also take appropriate steps
against the offenders who have prevented circulation of the
aforesaid newspaper. Notices for Comments dated 27.8.2018 were
issued to the Government of Tripura on 27.8.2018 followed by
reminder dated 9.4.2019. Report filed by Govt. of Tripura
Shri Subrata Chakraborty, Asst. Inspector General of Police,
Govt. of Tripura has filed a Report dated 8.11.2018 in the matter.
It has been stated in the Report that after declaration of result
of Tripura Assembly Election-2018, there is no complaint or
allegation received by the PSs against the BJP workers and
anti-social elements regarding distribution, carrying packets of
Daily Desher Katha newspaper by the public vehicle. However, OC PSc
are instructed to take strong steps against any anti-social
elements if any allegation reported about the matter. The report
further stated that it is a general type of allegation. The
complainant may be advised to lodge a specific complaint, if any,
to concerned police station. It is also not clear if affected party
had approached a local PS.
Report of the Inquiry Committee The matter came up for hearing
before the Inquiry Committee on 28.5.2019 at
New Delhi. Shri R.S. Lakshman, Advocate appeared on behalf of
the complainant. Shri Shuvdeep Roy, Advocate represented the State
Govt. of Tripura.
It is the allegation of the complainant that the miscreants had
restricted the distribution of the Daily newspaper, Daily Desher
Katha and compelled the vendor to set on fire the copies of the
daily newspaper. A copy of the report submitted by the Additional
Secretary of the Home Department to the Government of Tripura had
been annexed with the letter of the State Government dated 22nd
April, 2019. It had been stated in the letter that there was no
complaint received in the Police Station making allegation against
the BJP workers and anti social elements in restricting the
distribution of “Daily Desher Katha” newspaper. In the said letter
it has been further
-
stated that the Officer In-charge of the Police Station has been
instructed to take strong steps against any anti social
elements.
The Inquiry Committee has perused the complaint and finds that
there is a letter addressed to the Officer In-charge of Teliamura
Police Station on 8.5.2018 in which the act of restricting the
distribution of the newspaper and setting those on fire have been
mentioned. As the said letter discloses commission of a cognizable
offence, the Inquiry Committee directs the Director General of
Police to ensure registration and investigation of the case and
submission of Report as early as possible. The Director General of
Police and the Chief Secretary of the State shall further ensure
that the distribution of the newspaper is no way hindered by anti
social elements and members of any Political Party.
With the aforesaid directions, the Inquiry Committee disposes of
the matter.
Held The Press Council on consideration of records of the case
and Report of the Inquiry Committee accepts reasons, findings and
adopts the Report of the Committee and decides to dispose of the
complaint with the aforesaid directions.
-
Press Council of India
S. No. 7 F.No.13/173/18-19-PCI.
Suo-motu cognizance with regard to assault of journalists in
Tripura
Adjudication dated 22.8.2019
Facts The Press Council of India came across the news item
published in The Hindu
on 30.1.2019 under the caption “Tripura Govt. directs DGP to
probe attack on journalists”. It is reported in the impugned news
item that the Tripura Government directed the State Director
General of Police to probe the assault on two journalists,
reporting on narcotic smuggling, in the past two days. The order
came in the wake of allegations that members of a paramilitary
force were involved in the incident. It is further reported that
Shri Asish Chakraborty, reporting for popular vernacular daily
Dainik Sambad, was assaulted and intimidated in Khowai, while Sadek
Mia, a freelancer working for an electronic channel, was attacked
after being kidnapped from a border location in Sonamura. It has
also reported that there is a numerous cases of attack and
intimidation of journalists.
While taking suo-motu cognizance of the matter, Notices for
Statement in Reply were issued to the Government of Tripura on
31.1.2019 Reply
Shri S. Chaudhuri, Addl. Secretary to the Govt. of Tripura, Home
Department vide his reply dated 30.3.2019 has informed that
detailed report of both the incidents was sought from the Director
General of Police, Tripura, who intimated that on 27.1.2019 at 1100
hrs Shri Ashish Chakraborty working for Dainik Sambad appeared at
Khowai Police Station and submitted a written representation to the
fact that on 27.1.2019 morning some unknown persons came near to
his house by a Wagon-R vehicle and asked a local shopkeeper
regarding exact location of his house and left. Khowai Police
Station started an investigation on the fact under Section 157
Cr.PC. During enquiry, it has been revealed that on 27.1.2019 at
about 8:45 hrs some unknown persons (3/4) came in front of the shop
of one Suman Bhattacherjee located at T.K.D.K. Road by a white
colour Wagnor-R vehicle. Out of them, one person came out from the
car and asked Suman Bhattacherjee about the exact location of the
house of Shri Ashish Chakraborty. Accordingly, Suman Bhattacherjee
showed the house of Shri Ashish Chakraborty. Then they left that
area towards Subhash Park. However, during investigation it
revealed that the complainant never received any threat phone
calls, SMS message regarding his reporting of various
crime/criminal/ anti-social activities. He neither received any
direct threat from any person and nor cognizance offence
detected.
-
It has been further intimated that on 27.1.2019 at evening a
group of paramilitary forces moving in a plate less number vehicle,
physically assaulted Shri Sadek Miah and snatched away his
handy-camera and mobile phone and also threatened him with dire
consequences for chasing their vehicle. Shri Sadek Miah was taken
in an ash colour private vehicle and then after some time they left
him somewhere after Motinagar Market on Sonamura-Boxanagar Road.
Due to the assault, the Shri Miah sustained internal injuries and
was admitted at Community Health Centre, Sonamura for getting
medical aid. In this connection, a case was registered vide
Sonamura Police Station Case No.2019SNM005 dated 28.1.2019 under
Section 341/325/384/506/34 IPC. During investigation, Investigation
Officer of the case visited the place of occurrence, examined and
recovered the statements of the witnesses under Section 161 Cr.PC
and established that on 27.1.2019 one officer had came to visit
Nirmahal (Rudrasagar) and after his visit at Rudrasagar he had paid
a short visit to the Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Sonamura who
was present at Melagarh Police Station and thereafter, he left in a
while vehicle. It has been further stated that the SDR and the
tower locations of the sought mobile numbers are yet to be received
from the concerned Service Providers. The call details are awaited
to ascertain the presence of that vehicle and the suspected accused
persons at the place of occurrence. It has been informed that the
investigation of the case is under progress and is under the
supervision of Sub-Divisional level. The case is pending for the
non-receipt of SDR and tower location of the mobile numbers.
Report of the Inquiry Committee
The matter came up for hearing before the Inquiry Committee on
28.5.2019 at New Delhi. Mr. Shuvodeep Roy, Standing Counsel of the
State of Tripura appears on behalf of the Government. Assault on
journalists in Tripura is the subject matter of this Suo-motu
inquiry. From the reply dated 30th of March, 2019 of the Additional
Secretary to the Government of Tripura, Home Department, it appears
that Sonamura Police Station case No. 2019SNM005 dated 28th of
January, 2019 under Section 341/325/384/506/34 of the Indian Penal
Code was registered for physical assault and other offences on Shri
Sadek Mia. From the report, it appears that the case is still under
investigation. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the
Inquiry Committee is of opinion that the respondent takes
appropriate steps to conclude the investigation within 3 months
from the date of this Order. The Inquiry Committee is of the
opinion that the early conclusion of the investigation shall
generate confidence in the community of the journalists. The
Inquiry Committee directs for disposal of the complaint with the
aforesaid directions. Held The Press Council on consideration of
records of the case and Report of the Inquiry Committee accepts
reasons, findings and adopts the Report of the Committee and
decides to dispose of the complaint.
-
Press Council of India
S. No. 8 F.No.13/9/18-19-PCI.
Suo-motu cognizance with regard to attack on journalists by
Trinamool Congress activists in West Bengal
Adjudication dated 22.8.2019
Facts
Press Council of India has come across through various news
reports regarding attack on journalists in West Bengal. It has been
reported in the news reports that a news photographer of The Times
of India, Shri Biplab Mandal was stripped for reportedly trying to
click a picture of Trinamool Congress activists capturing the South
24-Parganas District Magistrate’s office in Kolkata so as to
prevent opposition candidates from filing nominations for the
Panchayat polls. It has been further reported that several other
journalists were also beaten up. According to the news reports,
Shri Mandal was forcibly undressed, illegally confined and beaten
while other journalists and photojournalists were attack in
Alipore, Kolkata on April 9, 2018 when they were covering filing of
nomination for the Panchayati Polls. No Reply A Report on Facts of
the case was called for from the Government of West Bengal on
13.4.2018 but no response has so far been received despite issuance
of reminder dated 29.5.2018. The Editor, Times of India was also
requested on 13.4.2018 and 7.5.2018 to provide complete detail with
regard to attack on their photojournalist, Shri Biplab Mandal but
received no reply. Report of the Inquiry Committee
The matter came up for hearing before the Inquiry Committee on
28.5.2019 at New Delhi. Shri R.K. Khanna, Senior Advocate and Shri
Pranenjit Das, Deputy Resident Commissioner represented the State
Govt. of West Bengal. Smt. Neeloo Sherpa, IPS, Deputy Commissioner
of Police represented the Police authority.
The Council took Suo-motu cognizance when it came to its notice
that one Press Reporter, Shri Biplab Mandal was reportedly attacked
by the activists of the Ruling Party, All India Trinamool Congress.
The incident led to registration of Alipore, Police Station case
No. 104 dated 11.4.2018 under Section 341/323/352/506 and 114 of
the Indian Penal Code. From the Report of AC-IIISP dated 25.5.2019,
it appears that investigation into the case is still in progress.
The Inquiry Committee is of the opinion that the case of such
nature ought not to have taken such a long time to investigate. The
Inquiry Committee says no more as it will prejudice the
investigation. The Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the State
Government of West Bengal states that investigation shall be
concluded within 6 weeks.
The Inquiry Committee takes note of the aforesaid assurance and
drops the
proceedings.
-
Held The Press Council on consideration of records of the case
and Report of the Inquiry Committee accepts reasons, findings and
adopts the Report of the Committee and decides to drop the
proceeding in the matter in wake of assurance given by the
representative of State Govt of West Bengal.
-
PRESS COUNCIL OF INDIA
S.No. 9 F.No.13/79/17-18-PCI
Suo-motu cognizance with regard to deadly attack on a journalist
of
Rashtriya Sahara, Shri Pankaj Mishra in Arwal District
(Bihar)
Adjudication dated 22.8.2019
Facts
A former Member, PCI has forwarded a link of “NDTV.Com” wherein
a news report published on 7.9.2017 under the caption “Journalist
Shot At, Robbed in Bihar. Attacker Arrested”. It has been reported
that –
“A reporter working with Rashtriya Sahara, Mr. Pankaj Mishra was
attacked and
robbed in Bihar’s Arwal district on 7.9.2017. He had been shot
and is under treatment at hospital. One of the two alleged
attackers, Shri Kundan Mahto, has been arrested. His accomplice
Shri Ambika Mahto is on the run. Shri Pankaj Mishra was carrying
Rs. one lakh in cash which he had withdrawn from the bank when he
was ambushed. The attackers had blocked the road and when Mr.
Mishra stopped his bike, they held him at gunpoint and tried to rob
him, the police said. When he resisted, they opened fire and a
bullet grazed his back. Shri Mananjay Sharma, the Chief of the
Congress in Arwal said Mr. Mishra was also a leader of the local
party unit. He also worked as a collection agent for the local
branch of a state-run bank and runs a help centre at village, which
helps people with various kinds of paperwork. Shri Mishra told NDTV
that he knew the men who attacked him. While taking suo-motu
cognizance of the matter, a Report on Facts of the case was called
for from the Government of Bihar on 12.9.2017. Reply Shri Dilip
Kumar Mishr, Superintendent of Police, Arwal (Bihar) vide his
report dated 23.9.2017 has informed that on the complaint of Shri
Pankaj Narayan Mishra (victim), a case No.62/2017 dated 7.9.2017
under Section 394 IPC and 27 Arms Act has been filed in Vanshi
Police Station against (i) Shri Ambika Kumar and (ii) Shri Kundan.
He has further informed that the allegation levelled by Shri Mishra
in the FIR against the accused regarding looting and shooting him
found correct in the investigation. According to him, one accused
Shri Kundan Kumar was arrested and sent to judicial custody on
8.9.2017 and the Vanshi Police Station was also directed for
arresting another accused-Ambika Kumar. He has stated that the case
is under investigation. Vide Council’s letter dated 1.6.2018, the
Superintendent of Police, Arwal was requested to intimate the
present status of the case but no response has been received.
-
The Editor, Rashtriya Sahara, Patna was also requested to
provide detail of the incident. Letter dated 9.5.2019 received from
Rashtriya Sahara Shri Om Prakash Ashak, Editor, Rashtriya Sahara
vide letter dated 9.5.2019 has submitted that the incident happened
with Shri Pankaj Narayan Mishra does not have any connection with
Rashtriya Sahara. He is not even employee of Rashtriya Sahara. The
Editor has further enclosed copy of F.I.R pertaining to this matter
which shows that it is personal matter of Shri Pankaj Narayan
Mishra. Letter dated 7.5.2019 received from Superintendent of
Police, Arwal The Superintendent of Police, Arwal vide letter dated
7.5.2019 while reiterating the Report filed earlier has submitted
that the prime accused, Shri Kundan Kumar, Arwal has been arrested
on 8.9.2017 and sent to the judicial custody. Other accused, Shri
Ambika Kumar, Arwal has surrendered before Hon’ble Court on
6.12.2017. A charge sheet with S.NO. 55/17 dated 30.11.2017 under
Section 394 IPC and 27 Arms Act has been filed against Shri Kundan
Kumar. Another charge sheet with S.No. 58/17 dated 31.12.2017 under
Section 394 IPC and 27 Arms Act has been filed against Shri Ambika
Kumar. No action is pending in the case. The case is under
consideration before Additional District and Session Judge,
Jahanabad. The S.H.O of the district has been directed to provide
security to Shri Pankaj Narayan Mishra whenever he goes to withdraw
money. Report of the Inquiry Committee
The matter came up for hearing before the Inquiry Committee on
28.5.2019 at New Delhi. Despite service of notice, nobody has
chosen to appear on behalf of the respondent. Taking note of a news
item that a journalist working with Rashtriya Sahara, Shri Pankaj
Mishra was assaulted in District Arwal in the State of Bihar, the
Council took suo-motu cognizance and called for the report. The
Superintendent of Police, Arwal has submitted his report wherein he
has informed that on the basis of the report given by the
journalist himself, a case has been registered under Section 394 of
the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He has
further stated that during the investigation, accused persons have
been arrested and sent to judicial custody.
It is further relevant here to state that a communication had
been received from the Editor, Rashtriya Sahara wherein he has
stated that said Shri Pankaj Mishra had nothing to do with the
newspaper and he is not its employee.
As the subject matter of the suo-motu inquiry has nothing to do
with the journalistic activity, the Inquiry Committee drops the
proceedings. Held The Press Council on consideration of records of
the case and Report of the Inquiry Committee accepts reasons,
findings and adopts the Report of the Committee and decides to drop
proceedings in the matter.
-
PRESS COUNCIL OF INDIA
S.No. 10 F.No.13/193/17-18-PCI
Suo-motu cognizance with regard to murder of two journalists
namely, Shri Naveen Kumar Singh and Shri Vijay Singh in District
Bhojpur (Bihar)
Adjudication dated 22.8.2019
Facts
Press Council of India has come across various news reports
regarding brutal murder of two journalists namely; Shri Naveen
Kumar Singh and Shri Vijay Singh in District Bhojpur of Bihar on
25.3.2018. It has been reported in the news reports that two
journalists riding a motorcycle were allegedly crushed to death by
the husband of a former village headwoman under his SUV in Bihar’s
Bhojpur district. The police arrested Ahmed Ali (Harsu) for the
double murder. According to the news reports, while Shri. Naveen
Kumar Singh, 45, was associated with a national Hindi daily Dainik
Bhaskar, Shri Vijay Singh, 35, reportedly contributed to a local
vernacular magazine. Police said Harsu had a heated argument with
the two journalists over certain news reports in the market of
Garahani, about 80 km from Patna, at around 8 pm on 25.3.2018.
After the argument, Sh. Naveen and Vijay left the market on a
motorcycle. An agitated Harsu followed them on his SUV and crushed
them to death, a police officer said. It has been stated that the
Patna Zone IG said an FIR has been lodged at Garahani police
station. “An SIT led by Bhojpur Superintendent of Police has been
formed to investigate the case”, the IG said, adding that forensic
experts have lifted evidences from the spot. According to the news
reports, quoting the FIR lodged by Sh. Naveen’s brother, Garahani
Police Station’s SHO said Harsu had been nursing a grudge against
Shri Naveen for writing against his family. The FIR has also
alleged the involvement of Harsu’s son, Dabloo in the murder.
While taking suo-motu cognizance of the matter, a Report on
facts of the case was called for from the Government of Bihar on
27.3.2018. Reply The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Bihar,
Patna vide his reply dated 18.6.2018 has informed that a report of
the case has been received from the Superintendent of Police,
Bhojpur, who in his report has stated that on the written complaint
of Shri Rajesh Kumar Singh (brother of Shri Naveen Kumar Singh) a
case No.29/18 dated 302/427/34 IPC was registered in Police
Station-Agiao (Gardhani) against Ahmed Ali @ Harshu Mian, Dabloo @
Asif Ahmed and two other unknown for allegedly crushing Shri Naveen
Kumar and Shri Vijay Singh to death by an SUV car. During the
investigation, allegation was found to be true and the prime
accused, Ahmed Ali was arrested and produced before the court and
other accused Dabloo @ Asif Ahmed surrendered on 28.3.2018 and sent
to the judicial custody. The matter is under investigation at
present.
-
The Editor, Dainik Bhaskar, Patna was also requested on
27.3.2018 to provide detail of the incident but no reply has been
received despite issuance of reminder dated 9.5.2018. Report of the
Inquiry Committee
The matter came up for hearing before the Inquiry Committee on
28.5.2019 at New Delhi. Mr. Murari appeared on behalf of the
Superintendent of Police, Bhojpur, Bihar.
Murder of two journalists namely Shri Naveen Kumar Singh and
Shri Vijay Singh in district Bhojpur in the State of Bihar is the
subject matter of this suo-motu inquiry. Mr. Murari Prasad, Dy.
Superintendent of Police, Headquarter, Bhojpur is present. He
states that after the investigation, two persons have been
charge-sheeted and the matter is pending before the court. In view
of the aforesaid, the Inquiry Committee is not inclined to proceed
in the matter any further. The Inquiry Committee, accordingly,
recommends for disposal of the complaint. Held The Press Council on
consideration of records of the case and Report of the Inquiry
Committee accepts reasons, findings and adopts the Report of the
Committee and decides to dispose of the complaint.
-
PRESS COUNCIL OF INDIA
S.No. 11 F.No.13/106/17-18-PCI
Suo-motu cognizance with respect to burning and destroying
copies of “Arunachal Times”
Adjudication dated 22.8.2019 Facts:
The Press Council of India came across news reports of burning
and destroying copies of the Arunachal Times by “The Adi Baane
Kabang Youth Wing (ABKYW) in Arunachal Pradesh. It was reported
that the ABKYW destroyed and burned copies of the newspaper and
uploaded a video of it on social media. It has been further
reported that the ABKYW has also banned the distribution of the
daily in East Siang district and issued what it calls a Show Cause
Notice on September 28. According to the report, the ABKYW has been
critical of the daily for “ignoring their voice and not backing
their demands”, while the newspaper maintained that it had remained
neutral and covered all sides. It has been reported that the
publication has lodged a complaint with the Police.
While taking suo-motu cognizance of the matter, a report of
facts of the case was called for from the Government of Arunachal
Pradesh on 23.10.2017.
The Editor, Arunachal Times, Itanagar was also requested on
27.10.2017 and 5.12.2017 to provide complete detail of the incident
but received no reply.
Reply of Superintendent of Police, Itanagar
Smt. Shweta Chauhan, IPS, Superintendent of Police (Crime) PHQ,
Itanagar, vide letter dated 29.12.2017 has informed the Council
that as per inquiry conducted by Superintendent of Police, East
Siang District, Pasighat, 10 newspaper vendors of Pasighat were
examined and their statements were recorded and it has been
concluded that the Adi Baane Kebang (ABK) youth wing had issued a
call urging all citizens to boycott the daily newspaper “Arunachal
Times” but there was no coercion of force. She has also submitted
that no complaint of burning of newspaper or any kind of threat to
any person for enforcing the ban has been reported anywhere in the
State.
A copy of the reply has been sent to Arunachal Times on
29.1.2018 with a request to provide a detailed report of the
incident but received no reply.
Report of the Inquiry Committee The matter came up for hearing
before the Inquiry Committee on 28.5.2019 at
New Delhi. Shri K. Amarnath, Former Member, PCI and Shri Amar
Sangno, Sub Editor , appeared on behalf of the newspaper, Arunachal
Times. Shri Irak Bagra, SP(Crime) represented the Police Authority
(Arunachal Pradesh).
-
The burning and destroying copies of the newspaper “Arunachal
Times” by
the Adi Baane Kebang Youth Wing (ABKYW) is the subject matter of
this suo-motu inquiry. The Council took suo-motu cognizance when it
came to its notice through newspaper that ABKYW had destroyed and
burnt copies of the newspaper and uploaded a video of it on the
social media. A report was called for from the State Govt. The
Superintendent of Police, Itanagar has submitted his report dated
29.12.2017 in which it has been stated that the Inquiry was
conducted by the Superintendent of Police, East Siang District,
Pasighat and it has been found that ABK Youth Wing had issued a
call urging all citizens to boycott the daily newspaper “Arunachal
Times”. However, in the report it has been stated that neither
coercion of force nor any complaint of burning of newspaper has
been reported anywhere in the State.
Mr. Amar Sangno, Sub-Editor of Arunachal Times appears and
states that a report was given to the police and when no case was
registered, a complaint was filed before the Judicial Magistrate
who referred the case for investigation. Mr. Irak Bagra, S.P.
(Crime) admits that on the basis of the direction given by the
Chief Judicial Magistrate, a case had been registered and after
investigation the police has submitted the charge-sheet.
The Inquiry Committee is of the opinion that any obstruction or
burning of a newspaper directly affects the fundamental right of
the newspaper, it affects the freedom of the press. In the opinion
of Inquiry Committee, the State Government and all its
functionaries are obliged to ensure that the freedom of the press
is not violated. The Inquiry Committee expects from the State
Government to take such steps as are necessary for ensuring such
freedom to the press. The Inquiry Committee would also like to
observe that in case any group of people have any grievance against
a newspaper, the door of the Press Council is open for them to
ventilate their grievances, instead of taking law and order in
their own hand.
The Inquiry Committee directs for disposal of the complaint with
the aforesaid observation. Held
The Press Council on consideration of records of the case and
Report of the Inquiry Committee accepts reasons, findings and
adopts the Report of the Committee and decides to dispose of the
complaint with the aforesaid observation.
-
Press Council of India
S.No. 12 F.No.13/2/18-19-PCI.
Suo-motu cognizance with regard to summons to Editors and
Publisher of “Dawnlit Post” by Itanagar Police.
Adjudication dated 22.8.2019
Facts
A former Member, of the Council vide his email dated 3.4.2017
has informed that the Itanagar Police has issued summons to the
Editors and Publisher of the “Dawnlit Post” to explain a report as
a case was registered against the newspaper on the directions of
Metropolitan Magistrate of Itanagar on a complaint filed by the
State General Secretary of BJP. He has further informed that the
Police also wanted the newspaper to produce all relevant material
regarding the report, which means the newspaper has to disclose
source of the news report. According to him, BJP has filed a
complaint to frighten journalists of the State by making the
Dawnlit Post as an example so that they are forced to observe
restraint and ‘self-censorship’ in their reportage in the run up to
elections scheduled later this year. He has alleged that this is a
frontal attack on the freedom of press. While forwarding a copy of
the summon, he has requested to take suo-motu cognizance of the
matter. No Reply A Report on Facts of the case was called for from
the Government of Arunachal Pradesh on 4.4.2018 but no response has
so far been received despite issuance of reminder dated 9.5.2018.
The Editor, Dawnlit Post, Itanagar was also requested on 4.4.2018
and 9.5.2018 to provide complete detail of the incident but
received no reply. Report of the Inquiry Committee
The matter came up for hearing before the Inquiry Committee on
28.5.2019 at New Delhi. Shri K. Amarnath, Former Member, PCI and
Shri Ranju Dodum, Chief Reporter represented the Editors/Publisher
of Dawnlit Post. Shri Irak Bagra, S.P. (Traffic Crime) represented
the Police Authority.
Issuance of summons to the editors and publisher of the “Dawnlit
Post”, a daily newspaper published from Itanagar, is the subject
matter of the present suo-motu inquiry.
Mr. Irak Bagra, S.P.(Crime) appears and states that on the basis
of the direction given by the Court, the police registered the case
and issued summons to the editors and publisher. He states that
what has been done by the police was in discharge of their
statutory right to investigate and no fault can be found out in it.
Mr. Ranju Dodum, the Chief Reporter of the “Dawnlit Post”
appears.
-
The Superintendent of Police further informs that the person who
had filed the complaint had filed an application for withdrawal of
the complaint and based on that, the police had submitted final
report.
Taking notice of all those facts, the Inquiry Committee drops
the proceedings in the matter. Held The Press Council on
consideration of records of the case and Report of the Inquiry
Committee accepts reasons, findings and adopts the Report of the
Committee and drops the proceedings in the matter.
-
Press Council of India
S.No 13 F.No.13/134/17-18-PCI.
Suo-motu cognizance with regard to burning copies of a Daily
Poknapham by BJP workers in Imphal (Manipur).
Adjudication dated 22.08.2019
Facts
A former Member, PCI vide his email dated 21.11.2017 has
forwarded a link of “The Wire” wherein a news was displayed on
20.11.2017 under the caption “Imphal Newspapers publish blank
editorial to protest BJP’s burning of daily – Members of BJP’s
youth wing set ablaze copies of Poknapham newspaper for publishing
disparaging content against the prime minister”. It has been
reported in the news report that –
“Prominent Imphal-based newspapers, including the daily that was
burned
down by alleged members of the BJP’s youth wing, left their
editorial columns blank today in protest. Copies of Poknapham were
set on fire by unidentified miscreants in front of BJP’s party
office on 18.11.2017 over alleged disparaging content against the
Prime Minister. The editorial column has been left blank on
20.11.2017 in protest against burning of an Imphal based newspaper
by BJP youth wing-the editor of Sangai Express said.”
While taking suo-motu cognizance of the matter, a Report on
facts of the case
was called for from the Government of Manipur on 22.11.2017. The
Editor, Poknapham Daily was also requested to provide detail of the
incident on 22.11.2017 but received no response.
Reply
The Inspector General of Police, Office of the DGP, Govt. of
Manipur, Imphal vide his reply dated 6.12.2017 has informed that
the Superintendent of Police , Imphal West inquired into the matter
and stated that as per report of the officer-in-charge, City Police
Station, on 18.11.2017 no report related to burning copies of the
daily Poknapaham by BJP workers in Imphal was received by the
Police Station nor through the Police Control Room of Imphal West
District Police. Neither the media house nor the aggrieved
individual has lodged the complaint at the Police Station. The
matter came to light only after it was carried as news item in some
local newspapers. The District Police nevertheless has been keeping
a close watch on the matter to prevent any law and Order
problem.
Report of the Inquiry Committee The matter came up for hearing
before the Inquiry Committee on 28.05.2019 at New Delhi. Mr. K.
Amarnath, Former Member, PCI represented the Poknapham Daily
newspaper. Mr. L. Roshmani , Advocate, represented the State
Government .
-
When it came to the notice of the Council that Imphal newspapers
have left the editorial space blank to protest burning of daily
newspaper by a youth wing of a political party, it took suo-motu
cognizance and called for a Report from the State Government and
the Director General of Police. The Inspector General of Police
vide his letter dated 6th of December, 2017 had informed that the
matter was investigated by the Superintendent of Police, Imphal and
as per the report of the Officer-in-Charge of the City Police
Station no report related to the burning copies of the Daily
Poknapham was received in the Police Station or in the Police
Control room of Imphal West District Police. It has further been
reported that neither the media house nor the aggrieved individual
has lodged a complaint at the Police Station. However, in the
report it has been observed that the matter came to light after it
was carried as a news item in some local newspapers. The Inquiry
Committee is of the opinion that when the burning of the newspaper
came to the notice of the police through a news item, nothing
prevented them to register the case and investigate the matter and
bring the culprit to justice. The Inquiry Committee would like to
observe that lodging of a formal report by an individual is not
necessary for investigation and in matters like these where the
freedom of press is under threat, it was incumbent upon the police
to register the case and investigate the matter.
In the facts and circumstances of the case, the Inquiry
Committee directs the Director General of Police to ensure that a
case be registered on the basis of the news report and
investigation as permissible in law initiated and concluded within
a reasonable time. With the aforesaid direction, the Inquiry
Committee recommends for disposal of the case and drops the
proceeding. Held
The Press Council on consideration of records of the case and
Report of the Inquiry Committee accepts reasons, findings and
adopts the Report of the Committee and decides to dispose of the
case with the directions to Police Authorities.
-
Press Council of India
S. No.14 F.No.13/172/17-18-PCI.
Suo-motu cognizance with regard to assault on journalist-Shri
Biplab Dey by timber smugglers in Meghalaya.
Adjudication dated 22.8.2019
Facts
The Press Council of India has come across through various news
reports that a journalist-Shri Biplab Dey was assaulted by the
timber smugglers in Meghalaya. It was reported in the news item
that a freelance journalist-Shri Biplab Dey from Garo Hills, was
assaulted by timber smugglers on 23.1.2018 in Athiabari, West Khasi
Hills District, Meghalaya. The journalist was assaulted when he
went to capture the evidence of illegal transportation of timbers.
It was also reported that the culprits took away the camera and
mobile phone of the journalist to destroy evidence.
While taking suo-motu cognizance of the matter, a Report on
Facts of the case
was called for from the Government of Meghalaya on 1.2.2018. The
Shillong Press Club was also requested on 7.2.2018 and 13.3.2018 to
provide complete detail of the incident but no reply was
received.
Reply of Home Department, Govt. of Meghalaya
Smt. D.M. Nongrum, Under Secretary to Govt. of Meghalaya, Home
(Police) Department, Shillong vide letter dated 9.3.2018 informed
that the police received a written report on 24.1.2018 from one
Shri Klethon Sangma of Siminaguri village to the effect that on
23.1.2018, some unknown persons, who claimed themselves to be
members of the media came in a drunken state to Siminaguri village
and demanded money from the drivers of two trucks carrying logs
(numbers not known), where they created trouble and tried to attack
the truck drivers. It was further informed that the truck drivers,
however, managed to flee from the spot and in this connection, a
case was registered vide Mawshynrut Police Station Case No.2(1)2018
under Section 384/506/511/34 IPC.
According to her, on the same day i.e. 24.1.2018, another
written report was
received from one journalist, Shri Biplab Dey of Sepoy Colony,
Tura, to the effect that on 23.1.2018 at around 9:00 p.m. he had
stopped two timber trucks, who were smuggling timber at Siminaguri
village but the trucks managed to escape. After that he along with
his driver left the place. At 10:00 p.m., on receiving information
that a group of smugglers led by Shri Sugriv Rabha of Gamerimura
village, Assam is smuggling the timber, he along with his driver
went back to the spot. When he reached the spot, he was assaulted
by the timber smugglers and the truck drivers without any warning.
His driver managed to escape but he was assaulted and got beaten on
his face, head, chest, legs and on the back. They also stole his
laptop, camera and destroyed his mobile phone. In this connection,
a case was registered in
-
Mawshynrut Police Station Case No.3(1)2018 under Section
323/379/427/34 IPC. Smt. Nongrum has stated that both the cases are
presently under investigation.
Shri G.K. Iangrai, MPS, Asstt. Inspector General of Police (E),
Office of the
DGP, Meghalaya Shillong vide his letter dated 26.3.2018 has
added that in Case No.2(1)18, the named accused-Shri Biplab Kumar
Dey was not arrested but was issued Notice under Section 41 A Cr.PC
and is cooperating in the investigation. He has further added that
in Case No.3(1), the named accused-Shri Surgriv Rabha and others
have not been arrested as they are still absconding. He has
informed that both the cases are still under investigation.
Reply of I&PRD, Govt. of Meghalaya The Under Secretary to
Govt. of Meghalaya, Information & Public Relations Department,
Shillong vide letter dated 19.4.2018 has informed that their office
does not have any official records relating to Shri Biplab Dey and
he is not even officially recognized as a journalist, therefore, no
action taken report could be taken from their end. Further
Communication from Home Department, Govt. of Meghalaya
Smt. D.M. Nongrum, Under Secretary to Govt. of Meghalaya, Home
(Police) Department, Shillong vide letter dated 19.4.2018 has
informed that in connection with Mawshynrut PS Case No.2(1)18 under
Section 384/506/511/34 IPC, the named accused in the instant case
is Shri Biplab Kumar Dey. The accused person was not arrested but
was issued Notice under Section 41A Cr.P.C. and is cooperating in
the investigation. She has further informed that in connection with
Mawshynrut PS Case No.3(1)18 under Section 323/379/427/34 IPC, the
named accused in the instant case are Shri Sugriv Rabha of
Ghamerimua, Assam and others. The accused persons have not been
arrested as they are still absconding. The Under Secretary, Home
(Police) Department, Govt. of Meghalaya, Shillong vide further
letter dated 23.8.2018 has informed that the PS Case No.2(1)18 u/S
384/506/511/34 IPC, the name of the accused, Shri Biplap Kumar Dey
is cooperating in the investigation. The case is pending for
recording the statement for more witness and further investigation.
Regarding PS case No.3(1)18 u/S 323/379/427/34 IPC, the name of the
accused, Shri Sugriv Rabha was arrested and released on bail from
the court. The case is still pending for the arrest of the other
co-accused and further investigation.
Report of the Inquiry Committee The matter came up for hearing
before the Inquiry Committee on 28.5.2019 at
New Delhi. Ms. Aprajita Mukherjee, Advocate represented the
Govt. of Meghalaya. The alleged assault of a journalist by timber
smugglers is the subject matter of
this suo-motu inquiry. Ms. Aprajita Mukherjee appears on behalf
of the State of Meghalaya and has
filed an affidavit sworn by Mr. D.K. Iankra on 13thof May, 2019.
The Govt. of Meghalaya has also submitted a Report intimating that
on the basis of allegation of extortion from the truck owner, a
case has been registered against the journalist and
-
on the basis of allegation made by the journalist, a case has
been registered against alleged smugglers. In the affidavit sworn
on 13.5.2019 on behalf of the State of Meghalaya, nothing has been
stated about the status of the pending investigations. In fact,
from the letter dated 1st of August, 2018 of the Assistant
Inspector General of Police, it appears that the matter is still
under investigation. When Inquiry Committee enquired from the
Counsel, Ms. Mukherjee, about the status of the case, she was
unable to give any concrete answer.
The cases referred to above have been registered as back as on
24th of January, 2018 and till today investigation is still
pending. The Inquiry Committee is of the opinion that keeping the
matter pending for investigation in cases like this tells volume
about the inefficiency of the Investigating Officer. In the facts
and circumstances of the case, the Inquiry Committee directs the
Director General of Police of the State of Meghalaya to ensure that
investigations of the cases are concluded within 45 days from
today.
With the aforesaid direction, the Inquiry Committee drops the
proceeding in the matter. Held The Press Council on consideration
of records of the case and Report of the Inquiry Committee accepts
reasons, findings and adopts the Report of the Committee and
decides to drop the proceedings in the matter.
-
Press Council of India
S.No. 15 F.No.13/128/18-19-PCI. Suo-motu cognizance with regard
to attack on journalists at Ranchi on Jharkhand Foundation Day i.e.
15.11.2018.
Adjudication dated 22.08.2019 Facts The Press Council of India
has come across the news reports regarding lathi-charge on the
journalists by the police at Ranchi on 15.11.2018 during coverage
of Jharkhand Foundation Day. It has been reported that the
journalists were attacked by the police while covering the
lathi-charge on adhoc-teachers, who were protesting to regularise
them on the occasion of Jharkhand Foundation Day on 15.11.2018.
Several journalists were injured during the lathi-charge. A Report
on Facts of the case was called for from the Government of
Jharkhand on 22.11.2018. Simultaneously, Hon’ble Chairman, Press
Council of India vide Order dated 22.11.2018 constituted PCI’s
three-Member Fact Finding Committee comprising of S/Shri Vijay
Kumar Chopra, K.D. Chandola and Kamal Nain Narang to enquire into
murder of Shri Chandan Tiwari and was also asked to look into this
instant matter. Reply of Inspector General of Police, Ranchi
The Inspector General of Police (Human Rights), Office of the
Director General & Inspector General of Police, Government of
Jharkhand, Ranchi has addressed a letter dated 21.2.2019 to the
National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), New Delhi giving reference
to a complaint filed in NHRC by Shri Vishan Ranjan Daftuar, Gaya,
Bihar and its copy was endorsed to PCI.
It has been stated that the Senior Superintendent of Police,
Ranchi in his Report intimated that during Jharkhand Foundation Day
on 15.11.2018, a heavy security force outsourced from different
districts was deputed to maintain law and order, which was not
familiar with the local journalists. It has been further stated
that on