Top Banner
Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012
70

Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.

Dec 26, 2015

Download

Documents

Barnaby Lucas
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.

SecondaryReading Coaches’

Meeting

October 17 & 18, 2012

Page 2: Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.

Agenda• Welcome• Names with Friends & “What’s in a Name?” activity• PARCC FAQ’s/ELA Common Core State Standards (CCSS)• Video (Tom Sawyer Lesson)• Amelia Earhart-PARCC Assessment (prototype)

LUNCH & Updates• “Ba-da-bing” activity• Writing-scoring using rubrics & calibrated papers• FCAT 2.0 Writing FAQ’s• Exit Slips

Page 3: Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.

Names with Friends

Page 4: Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.

#1 Educators must…determine which Common Core State Standards are essential within:

Reading

Writing

Listening/Speaking

Language

Page 5: Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.

Why do we need essential learning goals?

• So new teachers (or teachers new to a grade level or course) know what to teach.

• So we have clear a understanding for all teachers of what is essential at each grade level/course.

• So we don’t rely on programs and supplemental materials to tell us what to teach.

Page 6: Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.

So that .…• students have greater opportunities to gain a deeper,

connected understanding of what is deemed “Essential”.

• we stop talking “about” teachers at other grade levels and begin talking, planning, and teaching WITH them!

• teachers don’t simply pick what they like to teach.

• students don’t end up with gaps in their learning.

Page 7: Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.

What are the criteria for essential learning ?• Endurance (Will this provide knowledge and skills that will be of

value beyond a single test date?)

• Leverage (Will this provide knowledge and skills that will be of value in multiple disciplines?)

• Readiness for next level of learning (Will this provide students with the “tools” they need for success at the next level or grade.)

Reeves, D. Cited in Ainsworth, L. (2003). “Unwrapping” the Standards. Englewood, CO. Advanced Learning Press.

Page 8: Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.

Larry Ainsworth describes a powerfulillustration in “Unwrapping” the Standards

Two students leaving a college history class were comparing results from an essay exam about the Asian Revolution . . .

One student recalled nothing.

The other student recalled the common attributes noted in all revolutions he’d learned in high school (ENDURING UNDERSTANDINGS).

Page 9: Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.

Students need explicit instruction for college/career readiness in order to be able to ……..

Page 10: Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.

Literacy Standards for Other Disciplines in Grades 6-8

Central to the vision for literacy embedded within the standards and the Model Content Frameworks is the idea that instruction in reading, writing, speaking, listening, and language is a shared responsibility within schools. All fields of study demand analysis of complex texts and strong oral and written communication skills using discipline-specific discourse.

Page 11: Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.

Each discipline…..

acquires, develops, and shares knowledge in distinct ways; educators in each field must take ownership of building robust instruction around discipline-specific literacy skills to better prepare students for college and careers.

-PARCC

Page 12: Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.

A Common Core Lesson

Page 13: Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.

FAQ’s

What we know so far…..

Page 14: Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.
Page 15: Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.

7th Grade SampleItem and Task Prototype

Amelia Earhart

Page 16: Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.
Page 17: Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.
Page 18: Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.

Just the Facts!!!!! Comprehension/Conventions

•Evidence-Based Selected Response (EBSR)—Combines a traditional selected-response question with a second selected-response question that asks students to show evidence from the text that supports the answer they provided to the first question. Underscores the importance of Reading Anchor Standard 1 for implementation of the CCSS.

•Technology-Enhanced Constructed Response (TECR)—Uses technology to capture student comprehension of texts in authentic ways that have been difficult to score by machine for large scale assessments (e.g., drag and drop, cut and paste, shade text, move items to show relationships).

•Range of Prose Constructed Responses (PCR)—Elicits evidence that students have understood a text or texts they have read and can communicate that understanding well both in terms of written expression and knowledge of language and conventions. There are four of these items of varying types on each annual performance-based assessment.

Page 19: Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.

Synthesizing Informational TextPARCC Prototype

• Read the Biography of Amelia Earhart• Read the article: “Earhart’s Final Resting Place Believed

Found”• View the video• Complete Claims Activity• In a paragraph, summarize and explain the challenges

Amelia Earhart faced throughout her life

Page 20: Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.

Reading Across GenresBiography

When 10-year-old Amelia Mary Earhart saw her first plane at a state fair, she was not impressed. "It was a thing of rusty wire and wood and looked not at all interesting," she said. It wasn't until Earhart attended a stunt-flying exhibition, almost a decade later, that she became seriously interested in aviation. A pilot spotted Earhart and her friend, who were watching from an isolated clearing, and dove at them. "I am sure he said to himself, 'Watch me mak e them scamper,'" she said. Earhart, who felt a mixture of fear and pleasure, stood her ground. As the plane swooped by, something inside her awakened. "I did not understand it at the time," she said, "but I believe that little red airplane said something to me as it swished by." On December 28, 1920, pilot Frank Hawks gave her a ride that would forever change her life. "By the time I had got two or three hundred feet off the ground," she said, "I knew I had to fly."

Although Earhart's convictions were strong, challenging prejudicial and financial obstacles awaited her. But the former tomboy was no stranger to disapproval or doubt. Defying conventional feminine behavior, the young Earhart climbed trees, "belly-slammed" her sled to start it downhill and hunted rats with a .22 rifle. She also kept a scrapbook of newspaper clippings about successful women in predominantly male-oriented fields, including film direction and production, law, advertising, management, and mechanical engineering……

Page 21: Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.
Page 22: Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.
Page 23: Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.
Page 24: Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.
Page 25: Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.

AS of today, PARCC prototype will require students to…..

•click-and-drag information from a text into a graphic organizer or map.

•write about the same passages that they read for the reading section.

•be scored for development of ideas, organization, and clarity of language.

•reduce reliance on formulaic writing.

•use information from a single text (summarization in the example shown); other assessments require the synthesis of information from either two or three texts.

•be scored on 4 point rubrics.

•have their writing scored by machine, but other parts will be scored by readers.

Page 26: Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.

Write three claims that are supported by the most relevant and sufficient evidence within “Earhart’s Final Resting Place Believed Found.”

Page 27: Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.

The answer is…

Claims

Earhart and Noonan’s plane crashed

into the Pacific Ocean.

Earhart and Noonan’ lived as castaways on Nikumaroro Island.

People don’t really know where Earhart and Noonan died.

Page 28: Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.
Page 29: Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.

Let’s Have Lunch!

Page 30: Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.
Page 31: Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.
Page 32: Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.
Page 33: Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.

Changes to FCAT 2.0 Writing

33

Page 34: Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.

State’s expectations for FCAT 2.0 Writing - 2013 and Beyond

34

Page 35: Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.
Page 36: Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.

Adjusted FCAT 2.0 Writing

Page 37: Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.

Why were changes made to the Why were changes made to the scoring of FCAT 2.0 Writing in scoring of FCAT 2.0 Writing in

2012? 2012? Florida raised the expectations of writing to prepare for the increased rigor students will encounter with the implementation of the 2014-2015 PARCC writing component.

37

Page 38: Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.

How will the scoring change How will the scoring change in 2013 and beyond?in 2013 and beyond?

• The State of Florida envisions a two-year (2012-2013 and 2013-2014) approach to implement rigorous writing.

• Responses will continue to be scored holistically as draft writing, but scoring will be more stringent.

38

Page 39: Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.

What are the expectations for high scores on What are the expectations for high scores on the FCAT 2.0 writing assessment ?the FCAT 2.0 writing assessment ?

• Increased attention to quality of details, requiring use of relevant, logical, and plausible support, rather than contrived statistical claims or unsubstantiated generalities.

• Increased expectation of overall control of the quality of support and the correct use of conventions.

39

Page 40: Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.

2013 Administration Parameters 2013 Administration Parameters

60 minutes to

•Read the prompt independently.

•Plan the response according to the task and purpose .

•Draft, revise, and edit the response.

•REMINDER: One prompt; two scorers; purpose not announced in advance; NOT a systematic rotation of writing purposes!

40

Page 41: Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.

Embracing Holistic Scoring• Judge the total response using pre-defined criteria of focus,

organization, support, and conventions;

• Understand the interrelatedness of writing skills;

• Pay attention to what is essential in realistic communication;

• Refuse to grade, list, or count weaknesses; and

• Consider how all the components work in harmony to achieve an overall effect.

41

Page 42: Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.

WRITING ELEMENTSWRITING ELEMENTSFOCUS• refers to how clearly the

paper presents and maintains a main idea, theme, or unifying point.

ORGANIZATION• refers to the structure or plan

of development (beginning, middle, and end) and the relationship of one point to another.

• refers to the use of transitional devices (terms, phrases, and variations in sentence structure) to signal both the relationship of the supporting ideas to the main idea, theme, or unifying point and the connections between and among sentences.

42

Page 43: Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.

WRITING ELEMENTSWRITING ELEMENTS

SUPPORT• refers to the quality of details

used to explain, clarify, or define. The quality of the support depends on word choice, specificity, depth, credibility, and thoroughness.

CONVENTIONS• refer to the punctuation,

capitalization, spelling, and sentence structure.

• These conventions are basic writing skills included in the Next Generation Sunshine State Standards.

43

Page 44: Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.

Looking at CALIBRATION Sets

44

Page 45: Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.

Looking at CALIBRATION Sets

45

Page 46: Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.

The Holistic Rubric Provides The Holistic Rubric Provides a Scoring Descriptiona Scoring Description

46

Page 47: Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.

The rubric is like a compass to get you going in the right direction.

The annotations are the street level map showing you how to get there!

47

Page 48: Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.

ACTIVITY: FCAT Writing rubricsare available at

http://fcat.fldoe.org/rubrcpag.asp

8th Grade Holistic Rubric 10th Grade Holistic Rubric

48

Page 49: Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.

ActivityActivity

With your table group, examine the differences between the FCAT 2.0 Writing rubrics for 8th and 10th grades.

Examine the different word choice between the grade levels and score points.

Page 50: Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.

VERTICAL ALIGNMENT TO VERTICAL ALIGNMENT TO SHOW APPLICATIONS SHOW APPLICATIONS OF THE HOLISTIC RUBRIC OF THE HOLISTIC RUBRIC FOR FCAT WRITING 2.0 FOR FOR FCAT WRITING 2.0 FOR 20132013

50

Page 51: Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.

51

Page 52: Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.

52

Page 53: Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.
Page 54: Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.

Let’s Try Holistic ScoringLet’s Try Holistic Scoring

It’s

,right?54

Page 55: Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.
Page 56: Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.
Page 57: Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.
Page 58: Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.
Page 59: Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.
Page 60: Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.
Page 61: Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.
Page 62: Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.
Page 63: Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.
Page 64: Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.
Page 65: Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.
Page 66: Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.
Page 67: Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.
Page 68: Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.

References

Reeves, D. Cited in Ainsworth, L. (2003). “Unwrapping” the Standards. Englewood, CO. Advanced Learning Press.

http://www.parcconline.org/samples/item-task-prototypes

Page 69: Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.
Page 70: Secondary Reading Coaches’ Meeting October 17 & 18, 2012.

Division of Language Arts/Reading

Karen SpiglerAdministrative Director

Dr. Sharon Scruggs-Williams Instructional Supervisor

North

Dr. Erin Cuartas Instructional Supervisor

Central

Laurie Kaplan Instructional Supervisor

South

70