Top Banner
SDDOT/SDLTAP Gravel Road Experimental Project Ted Eggebraaten, SDLTAP Tech Assistance Provider Ken Skorseth, SDLTAP Program Manager
38

SDDOT/SDLTAP Gravel Road Experimental Project Ted Eggebraaten, SDLTAP Tech Assistance Provider Ken Skorseth, SDLTAP Program Manager.

Dec 22, 2015

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: SDDOT/SDLTAP Gravel Road Experimental Project Ted Eggebraaten, SDLTAP Tech Assistance Provider Ken Skorseth, SDLTAP Program Manager.

SDDOT/SDLTAP Gravel Road Experimental Project

Ted Eggebraaten, SDLTAP Tech Assistance ProviderKen Skorseth, SDLTAP Program Manager

Page 2: SDDOT/SDLTAP Gravel Road Experimental Project Ted Eggebraaten, SDLTAP Tech Assistance Provider Ken Skorseth, SDLTAP Program Manager.

Reason for Project

• More than 75% of local roads in SD are unpaved – managing them is a challenge!

• Biggest complaints from public are: rough condition (generally from corrugation or “washboard” in surface) and too much loose aggregate on the surface makes it hard to control a vehicle.

• How critical is gravel quality to this and how does it affect total cost of maintenance?

Page 3: SDDOT/SDLTAP Gravel Road Experimental Project Ted Eggebraaten, SDLTAP Tech Assistance Provider Ken Skorseth, SDLTAP Program Manager.

• SDLTAP requested a research project on this matter to try to quantify effect of gravel quality on overall maintenance costs and road condition.

• SDDOT Research Review Board approved the project in 2009.

• SDLTAP was tasked with recruiting counties to build test sections and to advise.

• This presentation covers only SDLTAPs observation and documentation.

Project Background

Page 4: SDDOT/SDLTAP Gravel Road Experimental Project Ted Eggebraaten, SDLTAP Tech Assistance Provider Ken Skorseth, SDLTAP Program Manager.

• Primary focus is on effect of gravel quality on life-cycle cost of gravel road maintenance

• Three types of gravel used in study:1. Substandard but commonly used – meets no

spec except top size control – one inch minus.

2. Barely meets SDDOT Gravel Surfacing Spec – percent passing #200 sieve is low and/or plasticity index (PI) at bottom of range at 4

3. Modified SDDOT Spec – higher minimums of 10% passing #200 sieve and PI at 7.

SDDOT Gravel Road Test Project

Page 5: SDDOT/SDLTAP Gravel Road Experimental Project Ted Eggebraaten, SDLTAP Tech Assistance Provider Ken Skorseth, SDLTAP Program Manager.

SDDOT Gravel Road Test Project

• Three test sections were constructed in:– Hand County – northeast of Miller

– Custer County – northwest of Custer

– Brookings County – south of Volga

Page 6: SDDOT/SDLTAP Gravel Road Experimental Project Ted Eggebraaten, SDLTAP Tech Assistance Provider Ken Skorseth, SDLTAP Program Manager.

Location of Sections:

Page 7: SDDOT/SDLTAP Gravel Road Experimental Project Ted Eggebraaten, SDLTAP Tech Assistance Provider Ken Skorseth, SDLTAP Program Manager.

Substandard Gravel

SD Standard Specification

Modified Specification

Compacted and Uncompacted

Sections

Compacted and Uncompacted

Sections

Buffer Sections

Page 8: SDDOT/SDLTAP Gravel Road Experimental Project Ted Eggebraaten, SDLTAP Tech Assistance Provider Ken Skorseth, SDLTAP Program Manager.

Each section was built with three to four inches of new gravel after existing surface was prepared and shaped. Compaction/non compaction comparison as well.

Page 9: SDDOT/SDLTAP Gravel Road Experimental Project Ted Eggebraaten, SDLTAP Tech Assistance Provider Ken Skorseth, SDLTAP Program Manager.

One of the biggest challenges was finding gravel that meets the modified SDDOT Specification: “Shall have minimum plasticity index (PI) of seven”. (Even higher minimum was considered in project planning)

Page 10: SDDOT/SDLTAP Gravel Road Experimental Project Ted Eggebraaten, SDLTAP Tech Assistance Provider Ken Skorseth, SDLTAP Program Manager.

One way to meet modified spec – blend different material from separate sources

This was done on one section in Brookings Co and one section in Custer Co

Page 11: SDDOT/SDLTAP Gravel Road Experimental Project Ted Eggebraaten, SDLTAP Tech Assistance Provider Ken Skorseth, SDLTAP Program Manager.

More blending or “manufacturing” in the future?

Page 12: SDDOT/SDLTAP Gravel Road Experimental Project Ted Eggebraaten, SDLTAP Tech Assistance Provider Ken Skorseth, SDLTAP Program Manager.

Processing material from a natural clay source

Page 13: SDDOT/SDLTAP Gravel Road Experimental Project Ted Eggebraaten, SDLTAP Tech Assistance Provider Ken Skorseth, SDLTAP Program Manager.

Road mixing to get a high quality surface gravel

Page 14: SDDOT/SDLTAP Gravel Road Experimental Project Ted Eggebraaten, SDLTAP Tech Assistance Provider Ken Skorseth, SDLTAP Program Manager.
Page 15: SDDOT/SDLTAP Gravel Road Experimental Project Ted Eggebraaten, SDLTAP Tech Assistance Provider Ken Skorseth, SDLTAP Program Manager.
Page 16: SDDOT/SDLTAP Gravel Road Experimental Project Ted Eggebraaten, SDLTAP Tech Assistance Provider Ken Skorseth, SDLTAP Program Manager.
Page 17: SDDOT/SDLTAP Gravel Road Experimental Project Ted Eggebraaten, SDLTAP Tech Assistance Provider Ken Skorseth, SDLTAP Program Manager.
Page 18: SDDOT/SDLTAP Gravel Road Experimental Project Ted Eggebraaten, SDLTAP Tech Assistance Provider Ken Skorseth, SDLTAP Program Manager.

Custer County Test Sections

Some sections showed contrast in performance quickly due to gravel quality

Page 19: SDDOT/SDLTAP Gravel Road Experimental Project Ted Eggebraaten, SDLTAP Tech Assistance Provider Ken Skorseth, SDLTAP Program Manager.

Brookings County Test SectionsOnly one month after construction

Substandard Section

Modified Section

Page 20: SDDOT/SDLTAP Gravel Road Experimental Project Ted Eggebraaten, SDLTAP Tech Assistance Provider Ken Skorseth, SDLTAP Program Manager.

Substandard gravel loosens in 31 days.Loose aggregate (or float) is 1 ¼ to 1 ½ inches between the wheel paths.

Modified material has only 1/4 to 3/8 inch of loose aggregate (float) between the wheel paths in the same 31 days.

Page 21: SDDOT/SDLTAP Gravel Road Experimental Project Ted Eggebraaten, SDLTAP Tech Assistance Provider Ken Skorseth, SDLTAP Program Manager.

Current Status of Project• SDLTAP has accumulated photo documentation

on all sections over the past two years.

• Measurement and documentation has been done on these distress types in 2012:

1. Accumulation of loose aggregate (float)

2. Changes in top width from time of construction

3. Presence of corrugation (washboard) on surface

4. Change in roadway crown

Page 22: SDDOT/SDLTAP Gravel Road Experimental Project Ted Eggebraaten, SDLTAP Tech Assistance Provider Ken Skorseth, SDLTAP Program Manager.

The float test

Page 23: SDDOT/SDLTAP Gravel Road Experimental Project Ted Eggebraaten, SDLTAP Tech Assistance Provider Ken Skorseth, SDLTAP Program Manager.

Simply remove loose aggregate from a 10 inch cross section, weigh it and convert that to a one-mile section

Page 24: SDDOT/SDLTAP Gravel Road Experimental Project Ted Eggebraaten, SDLTAP Tech Assistance Provider Ken Skorseth, SDLTAP Program Manager.

Change is top-width is measured on traveled way – grass line to grass line

XX ft.

Page 25: SDDOT/SDLTAP Gravel Road Experimental Project Ted Eggebraaten, SDLTAP Tech Assistance Provider Ken Skorseth, SDLTAP Program Manager.

Corrugation (washboard): Hard to quantify in extent, fairly easy to measure severity

Page 26: SDDOT/SDLTAP Gravel Road Experimental Project Ted Eggebraaten, SDLTAP Tech Assistance Provider Ken Skorseth, SDLTAP Program Manager.

Crown:measured with a laser level

Page 27: SDDOT/SDLTAP Gravel Road Experimental Project Ted Eggebraaten, SDLTAP Tech Assistance Provider Ken Skorseth, SDLTAP Program Manager.

Summary of Loose Aggregate

• Brookings Section – measured 10-10-12:

– Substandard Compacted: 383 tons per mile

– Substandard Uncompacted: 405 tons per mile

– Standard Spec Uncompacted: 211 tons per mile

– Standard Spec Compacted: 203 tons per mile

– Modified Spec Compacted: 71 tons pre mile

Page 28: SDDOT/SDLTAP Gravel Road Experimental Project Ted Eggebraaten, SDLTAP Tech Assistance Provider Ken Skorseth, SDLTAP Program Manager.

Brookings Section – Loose Aggregate

Substandard Compacted Uncompated

Standard SpecUncompated Compacted

Modified Spec

Page 29: SDDOT/SDLTAP Gravel Road Experimental Project Ted Eggebraaten, SDLTAP Tech Assistance Provider Ken Skorseth, SDLTAP Program Manager.

• Hand Co Section – measured 9-11-12

– Substandard Compacted: 430 tons per mile

– Substandard Uncompacted: 402 tons per mile

– Standard Compacted: 266 tons per mile

– Standared Uncompacted: 287 tons per mile

– **Modified Spec Compacted: 277 tons per mile

** Testing showed gradation and plasticity varied little from Standard

Summary of Loose Aggregate (Con’t)

Page 30: SDDOT/SDLTAP Gravel Road Experimental Project Ted Eggebraaten, SDLTAP Tech Assistance Provider Ken Skorseth, SDLTAP Program Manager.

Hand Section – Loose Aggregate

Page 31: SDDOT/SDLTAP Gravel Road Experimental Project Ted Eggebraaten, SDLTAP Tech Assistance Provider Ken Skorseth, SDLTAP Program Manager.

Summary of Loose Aggregate (Con’t)

• Custer Co Section – measured 10-16-12– Substandard Compacted: 134 tons per mile– Substandard Uncompacted: 134 tons per mile– Modified Compacted: 92 tons per mile

Page 32: SDDOT/SDLTAP Gravel Road Experimental Project Ted Eggebraaten, SDLTAP Tech Assistance Provider Ken Skorseth, SDLTAP Program Manager.

Custer Section – Loose Aggregate

Substandard Compacted Uncompated

Modified Spec

Page 33: SDDOT/SDLTAP Gravel Road Experimental Project Ted Eggebraaten, SDLTAP Tech Assistance Provider Ken Skorseth, SDLTAP Program Manager.

Change in Roadway Width

• Brookings Section:

– Width ranges from 21 ft, 6 inches on the modified section to 24 ft, 7 inches on the substandard section

• Hand Section:

– Width ranges from 24 ft, 6 inches on the modified spec section to 26 ft, 10 inches on the substandard section.

• Custer Section: No measurement due to uneven cross section

Page 34: SDDOT/SDLTAP Gravel Road Experimental Project Ted Eggebraaten, SDLTAP Tech Assistance Provider Ken Skorseth, SDLTAP Program Manager.

Corrugation (Washboard)

• No corrugation observed on any sections meeting at least minimum standard specification.

• However, Brookings substandard section had corrugation on 100% of center wheel path at last observation.

• Custer substandard did not have corrugation.

Page 35: SDDOT/SDLTAP Gravel Road Experimental Project Ted Eggebraaten, SDLTAP Tech Assistance Provider Ken Skorseth, SDLTAP Program Manager.

Concluding Points• Meeting basic SDDOT standard surface gravel

specification reduces loose aggregate by 1/3 to 1/2.

• Widest differential was in Brookings County near end of corn harvest with 405 tons of loose aggregate on substandard section to only 71 tons on modified section.

• Most interesting fact thus far: Brookings has done blade maintenance up to four times on substandard section to only once on modified!

Page 36: SDDOT/SDLTAP Gravel Road Experimental Project Ted Eggebraaten, SDLTAP Tech Assistance Provider Ken Skorseth, SDLTAP Program Manager.

THANK YOU!

Page 37: SDDOT/SDLTAP Gravel Road Experimental Project Ted Eggebraaten, SDLTAP Tech Assistance Provider Ken Skorseth, SDLTAP Program Manager.
Page 38: SDDOT/SDLTAP Gravel Road Experimental Project Ted Eggebraaten, SDLTAP Tech Assistance Provider Ken Skorseth, SDLTAP Program Manager.

Rainfall Data

• Data from July 1 to Oct 1, 2012– Brookings Section: 4.17 inches– Hand Co Section: 3.07 inches– Custer Co Section: 2.57 inches