scm 435

Microstructures and Mechanical Properties of AustemperingCrMo (SCM 435) Alloy Steel

Cheng-Yi Chen, Fei-Yi Hung+, Truan-Sheng Lui and Li-Hui Chen

Department of Materials Science and Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan 701, R. O. China

SCM435 is a CrMo alloy steel and it is usually used to make the matrix of tempered-martensite by oil bath method, but it has someproblems about reliability in the thin plate specimens. This research used the austempering heat treatment on the SCM435 thin plate specimenwith a type of double loop and obtained the CrMo bainite structure, and then we could further investigate the mechanical properties of SCM435bainite materials. Experimental data showed that the stability of the mechanical properties of the specimen with austempering temperature 830Cfor 25min was better than that of 15min. The size of the austenite grains affected the strength of thin plate bainite specimen. After austemperingat 830C for 25min and salt bath at 290C, the stability of the ultimate tensile strength (UTS) was better than that of the salt bath specimens at310 and 330C. The average hardness of all the specimens was more than HRA70. The specimen with austempering at 830C for 25min andsalt bath at 290C for 30min had bigger grain size of the austenite and retained phase of 11.4 vol%. It also had higher hardness and strength.So, the austempering SCM435 alloy was improved for tensile strength comparing with traditional oil tempered-martensite process.[doi:10.2320/matertrans.M2012317]

(Received September 11, 2012; Accepted October 25, 2012; Published December 25, 2012)

Keywords: SCM435, alloy steel, austempering, mechanical properties

1. Introduction

The SCM435 is a CrMo steel with high strength and highhardness properties, and it has been widely used in themachine parts, shafts, gears and strength screw products.13)

However, this material often has lower reliability due to theinequality of brittleness in the high-temperature temperingand quenching. The austempering heat treatment can obtainthe uniform bainite structure to improve the brittlenessof tempering, and the austempering heat treatment is acontinuous process that it also has the efciency anduniformity. For the thin plate specimens, the mechanicalproperties of bainite structure are better than the traditionalmartempering structure.In this study, the SCM435 sheet was made into the double

loop-type thin plate specimens by punch-shear process tohighlight the stress concentration to study the effects ofthe brittleness.3,4) The bainite structure has the excellentmechanical properties3,5,6) and it can reduce the brittlenesseffect of the thin plate specimen (improve the strength andductility) by controlling the different phases of matrix(the retained austenite content). According to the reference,7)

the characteristics of austempering SCM435 still not havebeen studied and the salt meet the environmental demands.Therefore, this research controlled the heat treatmentconditions to obtain the different bainite structures ofSCM435 alloy, and then investigated the tensile strengthand hardness to obtain the application data of SCM435alloy.

2. Experimental Procedure

The chemical composition of SCM435 is given in Table 1,the carbon content is 0.37mass% and contains the otheralloying elements such as Si, Cr, Mn. This research uses

the double loop-type thin plate specimen (t = 0.78mm) tohighlight the brittle effects of SCM435 alloy by punch-shearprocess. Figure 1 shows the geometric dimensions of thespecimen. The heat treatment conditions of the specimen was830C (vacuum) holding 15 and 25min for austenitisation,and then made it in the salt bath furnace immediately fortempering. The salt bath conditions were placed on eachconstant temperature of 290, 310 and 330C for 30, 60and 120min, then quench in the water. Each austemperingcondition was called xC-ym by the salt bath condition,such as 290C-30m.The characteristics of each austempered specimens are

determined quantitatively by SEM (Hitachi SU8000) andimage analyzer. The structure phases were identied by XRD(Bruker AXS Gmbh, Karlsruhe, Germany). The hardnessmeasurement (HRA) and the tensile properties (tensile rate:1mm1min1) of each specimens were evaluated in thebrittleness effect. In addition, using ESCA (Electron Spec-troscopy for Chemical Analysis, PHI 5000 Versa Probe)analyzed the surface to clarify the characteristics ofcompounds in the SCM435 bainite matrix.

Table 1 The chemical composition of the SCM435 (mass%).

C Mn Si P S Al Cr Mo Fe

0.37 0.80 0.26 0.010 0.004 0.008 0.83 0.15 Bal.

Fig. 1 The conguration of the thin plate double loop specimen.

+Corresponding author, E-mail: [email protected]

Materials Transactions, Vol. 54, No. 1 (2013) pp. 56 to 602012 The Japan Institute of Metals

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 2 shows the microstructures of the austemperedbainite specimen (830C for 15min) with the different saltbath conditions. Compared with previous other systems,5,810)

the microstructure of SCM435 alloy was ner (similar heattreatment condition) and it was a close relationship withthe alloying elements (carbon content). When austemperingduration extended from 15 to 25min, the bainite structurehad a coarsening phenomenon (Fig. 3) and it was becausethe austenite grain growth. In other words, increasing theaustempering duration of SCM435 specimens, we can obtainthe thick and feathery bainite structure.XRD spectra of the different salt bath conditions after

austempering 15 and 25min are showed in Figs. 4 and 5. Thegures show the peak angles are the same and the phases areconsist of the bainitic ferrite, Fe2.5C carbides and retained phase. During salt bath process, the retained phases form inmatrix due to the diffusion of carbon. In addition to the peaksof the bainite structure, there is no other obvious peak andwe can conrm the SCM435 structure to transform into thebainite matrix fully after austempering heat treatment.Figure 6 shows the comparison of tensile mechanical

properties of the different salt bath conditions afteraustempering at 830C for 15min. UTS of the specimen at330C is signicant decreased with increasing the holdingtime (reduce to 950MPa) and the tensile fracture resistanceof specimen at 330C for 120min was the lowest. In termsof hardness, no matter the conditions of salt bath 30minor 60min, the hardness was about HRA72. Furthermore,

increasing salt bath temperature of specimens would decreasethe hardness of the structure. The main reason is the coarsebainite structure and higher retained phase content.4,5,911)

Also, this result can conrm the content of precipitationcarbide is lower with higher salt bath temperature andlonger tempering duration, so there is no signicant contri-bution to the strength and hardness of the bainite SCM435alloy.Figure 7 shows the comparison of mechanical properties

of the different salt bath conditions after austempering at830C for 25min. The data at 310 and 330C is unstable. Thetensile strength of the specimens at 290C is reach 1100MPaand has a better reliability than the other specimens. Forhardness analysis, the specimen at 330C is more stablethan other two salt bath conditions (290 and 310C). Thehardness values are about HRA72 and the carbides in thematrix are distributed uniformity. According to results ofFigs. 6 and 7, the specimen is austempered at 830C for15min and precedes the salt bath heat treatment at 290Cthat has more stable tensile strength and hardness. It can beexplained that the salt bath conditions is more importancethan austempering time for the bainite structure of SCM435alloy.The salt bath condition is the closest relationship for the

mechanical properties, so the failure mechanism of thespecimens at 290 and 330C are compared to understandbrittle effects of thin plate specimens.3,8) Figure 8 is thefracture characteristics of the specimens after each salt bathheat treatments. In Fig. 8(a), we observe the dimple structureand conrm the characteristics of ductile failure. In Fig. 8(b),

(a) (b)

(c) (d)Fig. 2 Microstructural characteristics of the austempered specimen (830C-15min) with the different salt bath conditions: (a) 290C-

60min (b) 290C-120min (c) 330C-60min (d) 330C-120min.

Microstructures and Mechanical Properties of Austempering CrMo (SCM 435) Alloy Steel 57

(a) (b)

(c) (d)Fig. 3 Microstructural characteristics of the austempered specimen (830C-25min) with the different salt bath conditions: (a) 290C-

60min (b) 290C-120min (c) 330C-60min (d) 330C-120min.

Diffraction angle, 2 / degree

Inte

nsity

(a.u.

)

Fig. 4 XRD of the austempered specimen (830C-15min) with thedifferent salt bath conditions.

Diffraction angle, 2 / degree

Inte

nsity

(a.u.

)

Fig. 5 XRD of the austempered specimen (830C-25min) with thedifferent salt bath conditions.

Ten

sile

stre

ngth

, UTS

/ M

Pa

Har

dnes

s, H

/ H

RA

Fig. 6 The mechanical properties of the austempered specimen (830C-15min) with the different salt bath conditions.

Ten

sile

stre

ngth

, UTS

/ M

Pa

Har

dnes

s, H

/ HR

A

Fig. 7 The mechanical properties of the austempered specimen (830C-25min) with the different salt bath conditions.

C.-Y. Chen, F.-Y. Hung, T.-S. Lui and L.-H. Chen58

the tensile fracture structure is level and ladder-splitting.There are only a few dimple microstructures, so the brittlebehavior is the major mechanism for the failure mode.In Figs. 8(c) and 8(d), although the dimple microstructuresare observed, but the main mechanism are still splitting,and it is belong to brittle materials fracture mode, so ithas a lower tensile strength. From failure mechanism,the brittle of thin plate specimen has high sensitivity (t =0.78mm). If the SCM435 has no appropriate austemperingconditions, even the upper bainite structures still occur thebrittle failure.According to literature,12) the carbides of the iron-base

austempering specimen are relationship with material failuremode. A short time austempering heat treatment can obtainthe structural toughness, but longer austempering heattreatment can improve the hardness and brittleness. Basedon this, we use ESCA to analyze the specimen after salt bathto understand the carbide system. Figures 9 and 10 are thegraphs of surface analysis, compare with them can nd all thespecimens have a small amount of carbide generated (thiscarbide is Fe2.5C). Furthermore, increasing austempered time,the tensile strength of SCM435 is decreased signicantly.It is clear that the retained phase (the specimen at 290C, = 11.4 vol%) of the matrix is the main reason to effect thefailure mechanism.Figure 11 shows the microstructure of each specimen

which corresponds to the mechanical properties at differentsalt bath temperatures. The content of the bainite structureincreased with reducing the salt bath temperature. Theretained phase has the contribution to improve thebrittleness effect and enhance the tensile reliability.

(a) (b)

(c) (d)Fig. 8 The fractured characteristics of the austempered specimen (830C-25min) with the different salt bath conditions: (a) 290C-60min

(b) 290C-120min (c) 330C-60min (d) 330C-120min.

(a)

(b) Binding Energy, BE / eV

Binding Energy, BE / eV

Inte

nsity

, C/

S / 1

04In

tens

ity, C/

S / 1

0 4

Fig. 9 ESCA of the austempered specimen (830C-15min) with thedifferent salt bath conditions: (a) 290C-30min (b) 290C-120min.

Microstructures and Mechanical Properties of Austempering CrMo (SCM 435) Alloy Steel 59

4. Conclusion

(1) The SCM435 alloy steel had some problems aboutreliability when it used the martempering heat treat-ment. The SCM435 alloy steel transformed into thebainite structure by austempering heat treatment thathad some retained phase and a few Fe2.5C carbides toraise the reliability.

(2) The tensile strength and hardness of the SCM435alloy were improved when the grain size of theaustenite had growth and formed ner bainite structure.Extending the austempered heat treatment time woulddecrease the hardness due to the structure had lowercarbon content. For 290C specimen, it had a nerbainite structure and higher retained phase that could

improve the temper brittleness of the SCM435 thinplate specimen.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to National Cheng KungUniversity, the Center for Micro/Nano Science and Tech-nology (D101-2700) and NSC 101-2221-E-006-114 for thenancial support.

REFERENCES

1) R. Murakami, D. Yonekura and T. Murayama: Int. J. Modern Phys. B17 (2003) 16971703.

2) H. Itoh, M. Ochi, I. Fujiwara and T. Momoo: JSME Int. J. Ser. B FluidsTherm. Eng. 47 (2004) 316322.

3) A. Abdollah-Zadeh, A. Salemi and H. Assadi: Mater. Sci. Eng. A 483484 (2008) 325328.

4) B. Avishan, S. Yazdani and S. H. Nedjad: Mater. Sci. Eng. A 548(2012) 106111.

5) H. Bhadeshia: J. Phys. IV 7 (1997) C5-367C5-376.6) S. A. Sajjadi and S. M. Zebarjad: J. Mater. Process. Technol. 189

(2007) 107113.7) B. Podgornik, J. Vizintin, I. Thorbjornsson, B. Johannesson, J. T.

Thorgrimsson, M. M. Celis and N. Valle: Wear 274 (2012) 267273.8) K. Funatani: Metal Sci. Heat Treat. 46 (2004) 277281.9) Y. Luo, J. M. Peng, H. B. Wang and X. C. Wu: Mater. Sci. Eng. A 527

(2010) 34333437.10) K. T. Park and H. J. Kwon: Metals Mater. Korea 7 (2001) 9599.11) K. Tsuzaki and T. Maki: J. Phys. IV 5 (1995) 6170.12) J. Olofsson, D. Larsson and I. L. Svensson: Metall. Mater. Trans. A 42

(2011) 39994007.

Fig. 11 The diagram of the strength and reliability with the differentaustempered temperature.

(a)

(b) Binding Energy, BE / eV

Binding Energy, BE / eV

Inte

nsity

, C/

S / 1

04In

tens

ity, C/

S / 1

04

Fig. 10 ESCA of the austempered specimen (830C-15min) with thedifferent salt bath conditions: (a) 290C-30min (b) 290C-120min.

C.-Y. Chen, F.-Y. Hung, T.-S. Lui and L.-H. Chen60