Scientific communication Dasapta Erwin Irawan Institut Teknologi Bandung FE-Unisba, 31/03/2016 0000-0002-1526-0863 1
Scientific communicationDasapta Erwin Irawan
Institut Teknologi Bandung
FE-Unisba, 31/03/2016
0000-0002-1526-0863
1
introduction
2
lisensi CC-BY
• This slide can be copied, distributed, re-used, for commercial and non-commercial purposes as long as it is properly cited.
3
a glimpse about me
• Edu: S1 - S2 - S3: Teknik Geologi ITB
• Research interest:
• hydrogeology, hydrochemistry
• data analysis
• scientific profile:
4
books
5
Hidrogeologi Umum (2015), Penerbit Ombak Yogyakarta
Menulis (ilmiah) itu menyenangkan (2016), Penerbit ITB, Bandung
Belajar statistika dengan R (2016), Penerbit USU, Medan
paper written vs cited
6
rapid growth of papers
Bornmann and Mutz (2014), urlhttp://arxiv.org/abs/1402.4578
7
publication delays (time spent in editors + reviewers)
http://blog.dhimmel.com/plos-and-publishing-delays/
8
number of papers (in English): language drawback?
www.carbonbrief.org
9
scientific paper karma
10
scientific communication
11
how scientists communicate
• through scientific papers and seminars/conferences
12
how scientists communicate
• based on data and reproducible analyses
13
how scientists communicate
• objectives
• based on facts
14
how scientists communicate
• open and transparent
• peer-review
15
academic cycle
16
expected output
• formal:
• research reports
• papers:
• in journals
• in proceedings
17
problems with formal outputs
• research reports (closed distribution)
• papers in journals and proceedings (openly distributed, but yet still for limited number of people)
• in journals (no online version)
• in proceedings (limited circulation)
18
the impact
is very low
19
how we increase the impact
by increasing scientific communication
20
how we increase the impact
by increasing effort to engage with community
21
how we increase the impact
by using as many tools to make our work easily found
22
how we increase the impact
by exploiting scientific community, eg: Researchgate, Mendeley, etc
23
expected output
• non-formal:
• blogs
• websites
• twitter, FB, G+
24
expected impact: add more audience
25
expected impact: add more citation
26
expected impact: reduce citation delay
27
take home message
28
recommended efforts
• write in English
• international language leads to more audience
• hire a translator if necessary
29
recommended efforts
• submit to open access journal
• conventional journal offers open access option
30
recommended efforts
• use widely accepted index
• don’t use a single exclusive index (eg Scopus)
• use other indexes endorsed by open science community (Crossref, Altmetrics, etc)
31
recommended efforts
• use social media
• promote your work
32
recommended efforts
• setup Google Scholar or ORCID profile
• university should facilitate this to promote its staffs
33