Top Banner
Science Literacy & Concept Mapping Sue Klemmer Cosee 9/25/2010
17

Science Literacy & Concept Mapping Sue Klemmer Cosee 9/25/2010.

Dec 17, 2015

Download

Documents

Janis Norris
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Science Literacy & Concept Mapping Sue Klemmer Cosee 9/25/2010.

Science Literacy & Concept Mapping

Sue Klemmer Cosee 9/25/2010

Page 2: Science Literacy & Concept Mapping Sue Klemmer Cosee 9/25/2010.

Sue KlemmerCamden Hills Regional High School25 Keelson DriveRockport, ME 04856(207)236-7800 ext 317sue_klemmer@fivetowns,nethttp://klemmer-science.wikispaces.com/

Page 3: Science Literacy & Concept Mapping Sue Klemmer Cosee 9/25/2010.

identify key concepts & relationships

weed out peripheral information

re-sequence instruction

Mapping for Myself

Page 4: Science Literacy & Concept Mapping Sue Klemmer Cosee 9/25/2010.

Mapping with Students

If you really want students to learn how to make concept maps …then you have to be willing to take the time to teach them how.

Page 5: Science Literacy & Concept Mapping Sue Klemmer Cosee 9/25/2010.
Page 6: Science Literacy & Concept Mapping Sue Klemmer Cosee 9/25/2010.
Page 7: Science Literacy & Concept Mapping Sue Klemmer Cosee 9/25/2010.

Map 1: Links as Definitions

Page 8: Science Literacy & Concept Mapping Sue Klemmer Cosee 9/25/2010.

Map 1: Definitions as Concepts

Page 9: Science Literacy & Concept Mapping Sue Klemmer Cosee 9/25/2010.

Map 1: Dependent Links

Can you spot the misconception?

Page 10: Science Literacy & Concept Mapping Sue Klemmer Cosee 9/25/2010.

Map 1: Nicely Done!

Page 11: Science Literacy & Concept Mapping Sue Klemmer Cosee 9/25/2010.

Map 2: Finding Symmetry

Can you spot the missed concept?

Page 12: Science Literacy & Concept Mapping Sue Klemmer Cosee 9/25/2010.

Map 2: Finding Multiple Links

Can you spot the SAME missed concept?

Page 13: Science Literacy & Concept Mapping Sue Klemmer Cosee 9/25/2010.

Teaching Mapping

start small and familiarprovide feedback & sampleshave students share & combine mapsprovide opportunities for revisiting mapscontrast maps with other reading

comprehension techniqueshave clear teaching & learning goalshave clear expectations (rubrics)

Page 14: Science Literacy & Concept Mapping Sue Klemmer Cosee 9/25/2010.

Concept Map Rubric

MEETS STANDARDS:• Maps meet the standards in reading

(comprehending vocabulary) and higher order thinking skills (applying & analyzing knowledge) when:

– all required concepts are present.– all concepts are linked to at least one other

concept.

• all links have labels that make nontrivial, valid connections between concepts.

Page 15: Science Literacy & Concept Mapping Sue Klemmer Cosee 9/25/2010.

Concept Map Rubric - cont’d.

EXCEEDS STANDARDS:• Maps exceed standards when they

demonstrate use of the higher order thinking skill of synthesis. This can be shown as:

– extra concepts that validly link given concepts to other topics.

– extra links that show multiple valid connections between concepts.

• a hierarchy or symmetry of concepts.

Page 16: Science Literacy & Concept Mapping Sue Klemmer Cosee 9/25/2010.

Concept Map Rubric - cont’d.

PARTIALLY MEETS STANDARDS:Maps partially meet the standards when they

show limited comprehension of vocabulary from context (reading) or limited demonstration of application or analysis (HOTS).

– One concept is missing or unconnected OR 1-2 links are invalid/trivial. (B-)

– One concept is missing/unconnected AND 1-2 links are invalid/trivial. (C)

Page 17: Science Literacy & Concept Mapping Sue Klemmer Cosee 9/25/2010.

Concept Map Rubric - cont’d.

DOES NOT MEET STANDARDS:Maps do not meet the standards when they show

lack of comprehension of vocabulary from  context (reading) or demonstrates little/no evidence of application or analysis (HOTS) or lack of understanding of concept mapping.

• More than one required concept is missing OR >2 links are invalid OR the links do not form coherent “concept-link-concept” sentences. (C-)

• More than one required concept is missing AND >2 links are invalid. (D)

• The links are not labeled.(F)