Top Banner
LUDWIK FLECK ZENTRUM COLLEGIUM HELVETICUM FLECK AND WITTGENSTEIN: SCIENCE AND LANGUAGE Prof. Dr. Mauro L. Condé (Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brasil) Mittwoch, 27. Februar 2013, 18:15 Uhr Collegium Helveticum, Schmelzbergstr. 25, 8006 Zürich
2

SCIENCE AND LANGUAGE Mittwoch, 27. Februar 2013, 18:15 Uhr … · Februar 2013, 18:15 Uhr Collegium Helveticum, Schmelzbergstr. 25, 8006 Zürich The question of possible interrelations

Aug 05, 2020

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: SCIENCE AND LANGUAGE Mittwoch, 27. Februar 2013, 18:15 Uhr … · Februar 2013, 18:15 Uhr Collegium Helveticum, Schmelzbergstr. 25, 8006 Zürich The question of possible interrelations

L U D W I KFLECK ZENTRUM

C O L L E G I U M H E LV E T I C U M

FLE

CK

AN

D W

ITTG

EN

STE

IN:

SC

IEN

CE

AN

D L

AN

GU

AG

E

Prof

. Dr.

Mau

ro L

. Con

dé (U

nive

rsid

ade

Fede

ral d

e M

inas

Ger

ais,

Be

lo H

oriz

onte

, Bra

sil)

Mitt

woc

h, 2

7. F

ebru

ar 2

013,

18:

15 U

hrC

olle

gium

Hel

vetic

um, S

chm

elzb

ergs

tr. 2

5, 8

006

Züric

h

Page 2: SCIENCE AND LANGUAGE Mittwoch, 27. Februar 2013, 18:15 Uhr … · Februar 2013, 18:15 Uhr Collegium Helveticum, Schmelzbergstr. 25, 8006 Zürich The question of possible interrelations

FLECK AND WITTGENSTEIN: SCIENCE AND LANGUAGE

Prof. Dr. Mauro L. Condé (Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brasil)

Mittwoch, 27. Februar 2013, 18:15 UhrCollegium Helveticum, Schmelzbergstr. 25, 8006 Zürich

The question of possible interrelations between the philosophy of Ludwig Wittgenstein and Ludwik Fleck’s comparative theory of science has not yet found the interest it deserves. As I will argue in this talk, a rapprochement between these two Ludwig / Ludwik makes sense with re-spect to the role of language in the construction of scientific knowledge. Whereas the importance of language in Wittgenstein’s philosophy has always been recognized and has been decisive in the tradition of analytical philosophy of science, it is less obvious for the thinking of Fleck — and nevertheless crucial, as I will argue.

LU

DW

IK F

LE

CK

ZE

NT

RU

M A

M C

OL

LE

GIU

M H

EL

VE

TIC

UM

Schm

elzb

ergs

trass

e 25

80

92 Z

üric

h i

nfo@

ludw

ikfle

ck.e

thz.

ch

ww

w.lu

dwik

fleck

.eth

z.ch