School Psychology and Accountability K. T. Hinkle, Ph.D., NCSP Valdosta State University InternetLoggingSystem.com: InternetLoggingSystem.com: A Technological Tool for Improving Training and Service
Mar 27, 2015
School Psychology and Accountability
K. T. Hinkle, Ph.D., NCSPValdosta State University
InternetLoggingSystem.com:InternetLoggingSystem.com:
A Technological Tool for Improving Training and Service
School Psychology & Accountability
AccountabilityAccountability is easy to understand if you don’t think about it!
School Psychology & Accountability APA Monitor-Feb. 2, 2005 (Ronald Levant)
“The EBP movement in the U.S. society is truly a “juggernaut, racing to achieve accountabilityaccountability in medicine, psychology, education, public policy, and even architecture.”
School Psychology & Accountability Accountability Accountability expectations central to most
organizations: schools, hospitals, government entities, private industry, corporations
Professional Standards for the Accreditation of Schools, Colleges, and Departments of Education (NCATE)
Principles for Performance-Based Assessment Systems in Professional Education Programs (NCATE)
Standards for Training and Field Placement Programs in School Psychology (NASP)
School Psychology & Accountability No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) 2001-effort to
improve academic achievement for all children NCLB-revision of the Elementary and
Secondary Education Act (ESEA) A Major part of NCLB is school district
accountabilityaccountability
School Psychology & Accountability Tom Fairchild-13Tom Fairchild-13 articles addressing
accountability and school psychology
between 1974-1996 Joseph ZinsJoseph Zins Tracey SeeleyTracey Seeley
School Psychology & Accountability
November 2004- NASP Communiqué
AccountabilityAccountability Project: Raising Awareness About Your Role Under NCLB
Tom Delaney
March 2005-NASP CommuniquéWorkload vs. Caseload: There’s More to School Psychology Than Numbers
Ted Feinberg, Karen Nujiens, Andrea Carter
Critical Accountability Questions for School Psychology
What are the potential consequences of collecting accountability data?
Who should be accountable? What kind of accountability data should we
collect? How do we efficiently/reliably collect
accountability data? What do we do with the data once we collect it?
Consequences of Accountability? “Imposed”-evidenced by excessive
bureaucracy and activities undertaken to justify a position or demonstrate compliance (proving what you do)- accountability measurement
“Offered”-provides an opportunity to forward improvement in systems and outcomes for individuals (improving what you do)-decision making
Consequences of Accountability Professional organizations and departments of
education can use data to provide leadership and direction to the field
Measure practices versus self-report yielding a more realistic perspective of practice and representation of the field
Data can be used to demonstrate the demand for and impact of service provided (both direct and indirect)
Barriers to Accountability Efforts Availability and familiarity with procedures
for obtaining accountability data-not part of our training
Manageability-involvement in accountability efforts is too time consuming and cumbersome
Data collection costs-clerical staff and other assistants as needed, travel (site visits)
Barriers to Accountability Efforts
Concern about the negative consequences of the information collected
We are used to assessing others, not having to assess ourselves
We have no competition Confirmation Bias-”Intuitive Empiricism”
Who should be accountable? School Psychology Students
(Practicum/Internship) School Psychology Trainers (University
Supervisors) School Psychology Mentors (Site
Supervisors) School Psychologists (Service Providers) School Psychology Organizations (NASP,
APA)
What Kind of Accountability Data?
Enumeration-tabulation of activities Number of services provided Demographic Data (race, gender, age, disability)
Process-personal/professional characteristics
Product-changes resulting from involvement (Outcome)
Three Kinds of Accountability Data Enumeration-tabulation of activities
Number of services provided Consultation Intervention Assessment Conferences/Staffings In-Service Training Research/Program Evaluation Supervision Documentation
Demographic Data (race, gender, age, disability)
Three Kinds of Accountability Data
Process-professional characteristics1. Data captures student skill development and
attainment2. Data that is reliable3. Data that is valid4. Data from multiple methods, sources,
environments, domains5. Data assessed across time and goals6. Data useful for program evaluation
Three Kinds of Accountability Data
Process-personal characteristics 1. Referral process/access & Time
management
2. Understanding/Interpersonal skills
3. Intern’s response/Competence
4. Interpersonal Quality/ Ability to communicate effectively
Three Kinds of Accountability Data
Product-changes resulting from involvement (Outcome)
1. Meeting needs/Duration
2. Discharge/Follow through/Quality of Care
3. Service satisfaction (response to problem)
4. Outcome/Change
What do we do with the data once we collect it?
Develop sample instruments, forms and procedures to be disseminated widely
Identify “Exemplary” programs or “best practices” in professional publications
Provide workshops at professional meetings to disseminate information about specific techniques
InternetLoggingSystem.comInternetLoggingSystem.comCopyright 2002 internet logging system, All Rights ReservedCopyright 2002 internet logging system, All Rights Reserved
The Internet Logging System (ILS) is a web-based, password secure program designed for students, field supervisors, university trainers, and program directors involved in school or clinic based practicum or internship experiences. The ILS records and reports both qualitative and quantitative data in distinct, operationally defined service categories.
School PsychologyConsumer Feedback Survey
Process1.Referral process/access2.Understanding3.Responsiveness4. Interpersonal Quality
Product 1.Discharge/Follow through 2.Discharge/Follow through 3.Duration4.Outcome