SCENARIO PLANNING SCENARIO PLANNING
Dec 26, 2015
SCENARIO PLANNINGSCENARIO PLANNING
THE PURPOSE OF THIS THE PURPOSE OF THIS WORKSHOP IS TOWORKSHOP IS TO
• UNDERSTAND THE BASIC CONCEPTS UNDERSTAND THE BASIC CONCEPTS BEHIND SCENARIO PLANNINGBEHIND SCENARIO PLANNING
• PRODUCE A SCENARIO ON A PRODUCE A SCENARIO ON A PARTICULAR ISSUE OF COMMON PARTICULAR ISSUE OF COMMON
INTERESTINTEREST
• IN A DEFINED TIME FRAMEIN A DEFINED TIME FRAME
IN ORDER TO GUARANTEE IN ORDER TO GUARANTEE COMPETITIVENESSCOMPETITIVENESS
ENTERPRISES MUST IDENTIFY ENTERPRISES MUST IDENTIFY SUCCESS POTENTIALS VERY SUCCESS POTENTIALS VERY
EARLYEARLY
THIS HAS BEEN CALLEDTHIS HAS BEEN CALLED
COMPETITION FOR INDUSTRY COMPETITION FOR INDUSTRY FORESIGHTFORESIGHT
ENTERPRISES SHOULD NOT ENTERPRISES SHOULD NOT LOOK FOR ONE VISIONARY LOOK FOR ONE VISIONARY
VIEWVIEW
AS IT WILL CORRESPOND TO AS IT WILL CORRESPOND TO THE GENERALLY EXPECTED THE GENERALLY EXPECTED
VIEWVIEW
INSTEAD THEY SHOULD INSTEAD THEY SHOULD TRY TO ACQUIRE VARIOUS TRY TO ACQUIRE VARIOUS
VIEWSVIEWS
WHICH DESCRIBE THE WHOLE WHICH DESCRIBE THE WHOLE WINDOW OF OPPORTUNITIESWINDOW OF OPPORTUNITIES
THE FUTURE IS NOT A SINGLE THE FUTURE IS NOT A SINGLE UNIFORM STATEUNIFORM STATE
BUT AN ONGOING BUT AN ONGOING PROCESSPROCESS
THAT REFLECTS THE THAT REFLECTS THE PLENITUDE OF HUMAN LIFEPLENITUDE OF HUMAN LIFE
THE FUTURE INCLUDESTHE FUTURE INCLUDES
• ALL THE THINGS WE LEARN ABOUT ALL THE THINGS WE LEARN ABOUT OURSELVES AND THE WORLDOURSELVES AND THE WORLD
• ALL THE INCREMENTAL ALL THE INCREMENTAL IMPROVEMENTS WE DISCOVERIMPROVEMENTS WE DISCOVER
• ALL NEW IDEASALL NEW IDEAS
• ALL TE NEW WAYS WE EXPRESS ALL TE NEW WAYS WE EXPRESS THEM AND RECOMBINE THEMTHEM AND RECOMBINE THEM
THE FUTURE IS A SYSTEMTHE FUTURE IS A SYSTEM
• NATURALNATURAL
• OUT OF ANYONE’S CONTROLOUT OF ANYONE’S CONTROL
• DRIVEN BY TECHNOLOGY AND DRIVEN BY TECHNOLOGY AND TRENDSTRENDS
• AND INDIVIDUAL ATTEMPTS TO AND INDIVIDUAL ATTEMPTS TO CONTROL ITCONTROL IT
SCCENARIOSSCCENARIOS
ARE ALTERNATIVE VIEWS OF ARE ALTERNATIVE VIEWS OF THE FUTURETHE FUTURE
SCENARIO PLANNING SCENARIO PLANNING ORIGINATES FROMORIGINATES FROM
HERMAN KAHN andHERMAN KAHN and
ANTHONY WIENERANTHONY WIENER
THE SCHEMES OF OUR THE SCHEMES OF OUR MENTAL MAPSMENTAL MAPS
LEAD US TO IMAGINE LEAD US TO IMAGINE FUTURES THAT ARE SPECIFIC FUTURES THAT ARE SPECIFIC
TO EACH ONE OF USTO EACH ONE OF US
AND THAT DEPEND ON OUR AND THAT DEPEND ON OUR PERCEPTIONS OF THE PASTPERCEPTIONS OF THE PAST
BASED ON WHICHBASED ON WHICH
WE MAKE ASSUMPTIONSWE MAKE ASSUMPTIONS
THE FUTURE TELLS US WHO THE FUTURE TELLS US WHO WE AREWE ARE
• AS INDIVIDUALSAS INDIVIDUALS
• AS A CIVILIZATIONAS A CIVILIZATION
DEPENDING ON PERSONAL DEPENDING ON PERSONAL INCLINATIONSINCLINATIONS
THE FUTURE WILL BE THE FUTURE WILL BE EXTREMELY ROSY OR EXTREMELY ROSY OR
EXTREMELY GRIMEXTREMELY GRIM
WE CAN SEE IT ASWE CAN SEE IT AS
• STATICSTATIC
• REGULATEDREGULATED
• ENGINEEREDENGINEERED
OR WE CAN SEE IT ASOR WE CAN SEE IT AS
• DYNAMICDYNAMIC
• IN CONSTANT CREATIONIN CONSTANT CREATION
• TO BE DISCOVERED AS A PLACE OF TO BE DISCOVERED AS A PLACE OF LEARNINGLEARNING
• A PLACE OF INTENSE COMPETITIONA PLACE OF INTENSE COMPETITION
TECHNOLOGY CAN BE SEEN TECHNOLOGY CAN BE SEEN ASAS
• AN EXPRESSION OF HUMAN AN EXPRESSION OF HUMAN CREATIVITYCREATIVITY
• LEADING TO AN INVITING FUTURELEADING TO AN INVITING FUTURE
OR AS A SCARY KILLING OR AS A SCARY KILLING THINGTHING
A TRAP WE MUST AVOIDA TRAP WE MUST AVOID
IS FALLING INTO SCIENCE IS FALLING INTO SCIENCE FICTIONFICTION
IF ONE DROPS IF ONE DROPS FUNDAMENTAL SCIENTIFIC FUNDAMENTAL SCIENTIFIC
CONSTRAINTSCONSTRAINTS
ANYTHING BECOMES ANYTHING BECOMES POSSIBLEPOSSIBLE
THE FUTURE IS NOT THE FUTURE IS NOT PREDICTABLEPREDICTABLE
SCENARIO PLANNING SCENARIO PLANNING GIVES USGIVES US
DIFFERENT SIGHTS OF THE DIFFERENT SIGHTS OF THE FUTUREFUTURE
SCENARIO PLANNING IS SCENARIO PLANNING IS MORE A THINKING INTO THE MORE A THINKING INTO THE
FUTUREFUTURE
THAN A PREDICTIONTHAN A PREDICTION
SCENARIOS CAN BE SCENARIOS CAN BE CLASSIFIED INTO THREE MAJOR CLASSIFIED INTO THREE MAJOR
CATEGORIESCATEGORIES• INTUITIVE LOGIC BASED ON INTUITIVE LOGIC BASED ON
ORGANIZED COHERENT AND PLAUSIBLE ORGANIZED COHERENT AND PLAUSIBLE THEMESTHEMES
• TREND-IMPACT ANALYSIS BASED ON TREND-IMPACT ANALYSIS BASED ON ALTERNATIVE PROJECTIONS OF ALTERNATIVE PROJECTIONS OF
DIFFERENT KEY FACTORSDIFFERENT KEY FACTORS• CROSS-IMPACT ANALYSIS BASED ON CROSS-IMPACT ANALYSIS BASED ON ALTERNATIVE PROJECTIONS COMBINING ALTERNATIVE PROJECTIONS COMBINING DIFFERENT KEY FACTORS IN NEW WAYS DIFFERENT KEY FACTORS IN NEW WAYS
INTUITIVE LOGIC AND INTUITIVE LOGIC AND TREND IMPACT TREND IMPACT
SCENARIOSSCENARIOS
ARE STRATEGIC THINKING ARE STRATEGIC THINKING TOOLSTOOLS
CROSS-IMPACT ANALYSIS CROSS-IMPACT ANALYSIS SCENARIOSSCENARIOS
FOCUS ON QUANTITATIVE FOCUS ON QUANTITATIVE PROJECTIONSPROJECTIONS
THE FUTURE MAY BE THE FUTURE MAY BE CONSIDERED AS EMERGING CONSIDERED AS EMERGING FROM THE INTERACTIION OFFROM THE INTERACTIION OF
• EVENTSEVENTS
• TRENDSTRENDS
• IMAGESIMAGES
• ACTIONSACTIONS
EVENTS ARE THOSE EVENTS ARE THOSE THINGS WHICH MAKE THINGS WHICH MAKE
MANY PEOPLEMANY PEOPLE
DOUBT THE EFFICACY OF DOUBT THE EFFICACY OF THINKING ABOUT THE THINKING ABOUT THE
FUTURE AT ALLFUTURE AT ALL
THINGS JUST SEEM TO THINGS JUST SEEM TO HAPPENHAPPEN
WHAT IS GOING TO WHAT IS GOING TO HAPPEN NEXTHAPPEN NEXT
SEEMS UTTERLY SEEMS UTTERLY UNKNOWABLEUNKNOWABLE
SEPTEMBER 11, 2002SEPTEMBER 11, 2002
IS AN EXAMPLE OF AN EVENTIS AN EXAMPLE OF AN EVENT
THE 1929 STOCK MARKET THE 1929 STOCK MARKET CRASHCRASH
IS ANOTHER EXAMPLEIS ANOTHER EXAMPLE
SOMETIMES THE SOMETIMES THE SIGNIFCANCE OF AN SIGNIFCANCE OF AN
EVENTEVENT
IS NOT IMMEDIATEIS NOT IMMEDIATE
AN EXAMPLE WOULD BEAN EXAMPLE WOULD BE
THE DISCOVERY OF FIRETHE DISCOVERY OF FIRE
OR THE INVENTION OF THE OR THE INVENTION OF THE COMPUTERCOMPUTER
THERE ARE THREE TYPES OF THERE ARE THREE TYPES OF TRENDSTRENDS
• A CONTINUATION OF THE PRESENT A CONTINUATION OF THE PRESENT AND OF THE PASTAND OF THE PAST
• CYCLICAL TRENDSCYCLICAL TRENDS
• EMERGING ISSUES OR EMERGING ISSUES OR DISCONTINUITIESDISCONTINUITIES
TRENDS CONTINUING THE TRENDS CONTINUING THE PRESENT AND THE PAST CAN PRESENT AND THE PAST CAN
BE IDENTIFIED THROUGHBE IDENTIFIED THROUGH• CONTEMPLATING OUR OWN LIFE CONTEMPLATING OUR OWN LIFE
EXPERIENCESEXPERIENCES
• SOCIOLOGICAL ANALYSISSOCIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
• HISTORICAL ANALYSISHISTORICAL ANALYSIS
AN EXAMPLE ISAN EXAMPLE IS
THE CONTINUED THE CONTINUED PRIVATIZATION OF SOCIETYPRIVATIZATION OF SOCIETY
STARTED IN ENGLANDSTARTED IN ENGLAND
IN THE SIXTEENTH CENTURYIN THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY
WITH THE LAW ON WITH THE LAW ON ENCLOSURESENCLOSURES
THESE LAWS PRIVATIZEDTHESE LAWS PRIVATIZED
THE COMMON FEUDAL LANDSTHE COMMON FEUDAL LANDS
AND ALLOWEDAND ALLOWED
THE PURCHASING AND THE PURCHASING AND SELLING OF THESE LANDSSELLING OF THESE LANDS
THIS RESULTED IN A THIS RESULTED IN A DRAMATIC CHANGEDRAMATIC CHANGE
IN THE RELATIONSHIP IN THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MEN AND LANDBETWEEN MEN AND LAND
MEN NO LONGER BELONGED MEN NO LONGER BELONGED TO THE LANDTO THE LAND
THEY OWNED ITTHEY OWNED IT
THE RELATIONSHIP THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PEOPLEBETWEEN PEOPLE
BECAME MONETARYBECAME MONETARY
MEDIEVAL SOCIETY WASMEDIEVAL SOCIETY WAS
COMMUNALCOMMUNAL
PEASANTS POOLED THEIR PEASANTS POOLED THEIR LANDLAND
CATTLE GRAZED ON CATTLE GRAZED ON COMMUNAL LANDCOMMUNAL LAND
BY ENCLOSING LAND WIH BY ENCLOSING LAND WIH THE USE OF OBSTACLESTHE USE OF OBSTACLES
FREE MOVEMENT OF MEN FREE MOVEMENT OF MEN AND ANIMALS WAS HINDEREDAND ANIMALS WAS HINDERED
THESE LAWS WERE PASSED THESE LAWS WERE PASSED IN MOST EUROPEAN IN MOST EUROPEAN
COUNTRIESCOUNTRIES
FROM THE SIXTEENTH TO THE FROM THE SIXTEENTH TO THE NINETEENTH CENTURYNINETEENTH CENTURY
AND LED TO URBANIZATIONAND LED TO URBANIZATION
TODAY, ALL THE LAND IN TODAY, ALL THE LAND IN THE WORLDTHE WORLD
IS OWNED BY SOMEONEIS OWNED BY SOMEONE
EXCEPT IN THE ANTARTICEXCEPT IN THE ANTARTIC
OTHER SPACES HAVE BEEN OTHER SPACES HAVE BEEN ENCLOSEDENCLOSED
• OCEANSOCEANS
• AIR SPACEAIR SPACE
• HERTZIAN SPACEHERTZIAN SPACE
SINCE 1971 ENCLOSURES SINCE 1971 ENCLOSURES ARE BEING SET UPARE BEING SET UP
AROUND OUR GENETIC MAKE-AROUND OUR GENETIC MAKE-UPUP
IN 1971 ANANDA IN 1971 ANANDA CHAKRABARTYCHAKRABARTY
ATTEMPTED TO PATENT AN ATTEMPTED TO PATENT AN OIL-ABSORBING BACTERIAOIL-ABSORBING BACTERIA
INITIALLY THE INITIALLY THE APPLICATION WAS APPLICATION WAS
REJECTEDREJECTED
SINCE US LEGISLATION DOES SINCE US LEGISLATION DOES NOT ALLOW THE NOT ALLOW THE
PATENTABILITY OF LIVING PATENTABILITY OF LIVING ORGANISMSORGANISMS
AFTER SEVERAL COURT AFTER SEVERAL COURT CASESCASES
IN 1980 THE SUPREME COURT IN 1980 THE SUPREME COURT GRANTED THE PATENTGRANTED THE PATENT
IN 1995 THE US PATENT IN 1995 THE US PATENT OFFICEOFFICE
ISSUED THE FIRT PATENT ON ISSUED THE FIRT PATENT ON A CELL LINE TAKEN ON AN A CELL LINE TAKEN ON AN INDIGENOUS POPULATIONINDIGENOUS POPULATION
THE US GOVERNMENT THE US GOVERNMENT WITHDREW THIS PATENTWITHDREW THIS PATENT
UNDER PRESSURE FROM UNDER PRESSURE FROM SOUTH PACIFIC STATESSOUTH PACIFIC STATES
CYCLICAL TRENDSCYCLICAL TRENDS
HAVE THEIR ROOTS IN THE HAVE THEIR ROOTS IN THE DISTANT PASTDISTANT PAST
THEY ARE IDENTIFIED THEY ARE IDENTIFIED THROUGHTHROUGH
HISTORICAL ANALYSISHISTORICAL ANALYSIS
EUGENISMEUGENISM
IS AN EXAMPLEIS AN EXAMPLE
THE AMERICAN THE AMERICAN INTELLIGENTSIA FAVORS INTELLIGENTSIA FAVORS
EUGENISMEUGENISM
SINCE THE BEGINNING OF SINCE THE BEGINNING OF THE TWENTIETH CENTURYTHE TWENTIETH CENTURY
IT APPEARS EVERY TIME IT APPEARS EVERY TIME SOCIETY IS UNABLE TO SOCIETY IS UNABLE TO
CONTAINCONTAIN• POVERTYPOVERTY
• CRIMINALITYCRIMINALITY
• SOCIAL TURBULENCESOCIAL TURBULENCE
THE 1929 CRISIS SHOWED THE 1929 CRISIS SHOWED ALL PEOPLEALL PEOPLE
SUFFERED ALIKESUFFERED ALIKE
SOCIAL SOLIDARITYSOCIAL SOLIDARITY
DISPLACED EUGENISMDISPLACED EUGENISM
HITLER’S EUGENIST LAWSHITLER’S EUGENIST LAWS
ALSO LED THE US TO REACT ALSO LED THE US TO REACT NEGATIVELYNEGATIVELY
EUGENISTIC EUGENISTIC CONSIDERATIONSCONSIDERATIONS
ARE CENTRAL TO ARE CENTRAL TO BIOTECHNOLOGYBIOTECHNOLOGY
EMERGING ISSUES ARE EMERGING ISSUES ARE EVENTS IN THE FUTUREEVENTS IN THE FUTURE
THAT ARE BARELY VISIBLE IN THAT ARE BARELY VISIBLE IN THE PRESENT AND NON-THE PRESENT AND NON-EXISTENT IN THE PASTEXISTENT IN THE PAST
EXAMPLES OF EMERGING EXAMPLES OF EMERGING ISSUES AREISSUES ARE
• NEW TECHNOLOGIESNEW TECHNOLOGIES
• CHANGES IN OUR LIVING CHANGES IN OUR LIVING ENVIRONMENTENVIRONMENT
WE ALL HAVE A PERSONALWE ALL HAVE A PERSONAL
IMAGE OF THE FUTUREIMAGE OF THE FUTURE
AND WE TAKE ACTIONSAND WE TAKE ACTIONS
WITH THE INTENTION OF WITH THE INTENTION OF INFLUENCING THAT FUTUREINFLUENCING THAT FUTURE
BIOTECHNOLOGYBIOTECHNOLOGY
AN EVENT THAT COULD AN EVENT THAT COULD IMPACT BIOTECHNOLOGYIMPACT BIOTECHNOLOGY
WOULD BE THE DISCOVERY WOULD BE THE DISCOVERY OF UNCONVENTIONAL FORMS OF UNCONVENTIONAL FORMS
OF LIFEOF LIFE
A CYCLICAL TREND A CYCLICAL TREND IMPACTING IMPACTING
BIOTECHNOLOGYBIOTECHNOLOGY
IS THE MOVE AWAY FROM IS THE MOVE AWAY FROM NATURAL TO SYNTHETIC NATURAL TO SYNTHETIC
PRODUCTSPRODUCTS
AND BACK AGAIN TO NATURAL AND BACK AGAIN TO NATURAL PRODUCTSPRODUCTS
ACCORDING TO A 2001 ACCORDING TO A 2001 McKINSEY REPORTMcKINSEY REPORT
BY 2010 BIOTECHNOLOGY WILL BE A BY 2010 BIOTECHNOLOGY WILL BE A COMPETITIVE WAY OF PRODUCING COMPETITIVE WAY OF PRODUCING ABOUT A FIFTH OF THE WORLD’S ABOUT A FIFTH OF THE WORLD’S
CHEMICAL OUTPUT BY VALUECHEMICAL OUTPUT BY VALUE
AN EMERGING TREND OR AN EMERGING TREND OR DISCONTINUITYDISCONTINUITY
IS THE USE OF IS THE USE OF BIOTECHNOLOGY FOR BIOTECHNOLOGY FOR ENERGY GENERATIONENERGY GENERATION
AND IN PARTICULARAND IN PARTICULAR
HYDROGENHYDROGEN
THROUGH THE CREATION THROUGH THE CREATION OF A BACTERIAOF A BACTERIA
WITH A COMPLETELY WITH A COMPLETELY SYNTHETIC GENOMESYNTHETIC GENOME
OTHER ENTIRELYOTHER ENTIRELY
NEW PRODUCTSNEW PRODUCTS
SUCH ASSUCH AS
LIVING FUEL CELLSLIVING FUEL CELLS
A HAUNTING IMAGEA HAUNTING IMAGE
FRANKENSTEINFRANKENSTEIN
MAN SUBSTITUTING MAN SUBSTITUTING HIMSELFHIMSELF
TO DIVINE CREATIONTO DIVINE CREATION
A MAD SCIENTISTA MAD SCIENTIST
HEEDLESS OF HUMANITY’S HEEDLESS OF HUMANITY’S GOODGOOD
A MODERN PROMETHEUSA MODERN PROMETHEUS
MAN IS NOT ABOUT TO MAN IS NOT ABOUT TO CREATE HUMANSCREATE HUMANS
WITH OFF-THE-SHELF WITH OFF-THE-SHELF CHEMICALSCHEMICALS
BUT MAY SOON BE ABLEBUT MAY SOON BE ABLE
TO MANIPULATE HUMAN LIFETO MANIPULATE HUMAN LIFE
OR BREAK INTER-SPECIES OR BREAK INTER-SPECIES BARRIERSBARRIERS
AND CREATE NEW LIFE AND CREATE NEW LIFE FORMSFORMS
ONE OF THE FIRST ONE OF THE FIRST EXPERIMENTS WAS EXPERIMENTS WAS
UNDERTAKEN IN 1984UNDERTAKEN IN 1984
IN GREAT BRITAIN WITH THE IN GREAT BRITAIN WITH THE CREATION OF A SHEEP-GOATCREATION OF A SHEEP-GOAT
RECENTLY A HUMAN EAR HAS RECENTLY A HUMAN EAR HAS BEEN GROWNBEEN GROWN
ON THE BACK OF MICEON THE BACK OF MICE
WHETHER MORE SUCH WHETHER MORE SUCH COMBINATIONS WILL BE COMBINATIONS WILL BE
POSSIBLEPOSSIBLE
DEPENDS ON NATUREDEPENDS ON NATURE
AND GOVERNMENTAL AND GOVERNMENTAL ACTIONSACTIONS
OTHER GOVERNMENTAL OTHER GOVERNMENTAL ACTIONS INCLUDEACTIONS INCLUDE
• POSSIBLE BANNINGPOSSIBLE BANNING
• AVAILABILITY OF FEDERAL FUNDSAVAILABILITY OF FEDERAL FUNDS
AND THE PATENTABILITY OF AND THE PATENTABILITY OF LIVING ORGANISMSLIVING ORGANISMS
WITH THE EXCEPTION, AT WITH THE EXCEPTION, AT LEAST FOR THE TIME BEING, LEAST FOR THE TIME BEING,
OF HUMAN BEINGSOF HUMAN BEINGS
AS THIS WOULD BE CONTRARY AS THIS WOULD BE CONTRARY TO THE ANTI-SLAVERY LAWSTO THE ANTI-SLAVERY LAWS
IT IS, HOWEVER, POSSIBLE TO IT IS, HOWEVER, POSSIBLE TO PATENTPATENT
• EMBRYOSEMBRYOS
• FETUSESFETUSES
• ORGANSORGANS
• TISSUESTISSUES
• CELLULAR LINESCELLULAR LINES
• GENESGENES
WE WILL NOW LISTWE WILL NOW LIST
• TRENDSTRENDS
• IMAGESIMAGES
• ACTIONSACTIONS
THAT WE SEETHAT WE SEE
IMPACTING THE REALM OF IMPACTING THE REALM OF BIOTECHNOLOGY IN THE BIOTECHNOLOGY IN THE
COMING TEN YEARSCOMING TEN YEARS
SOME SUGGESTIONSSOME SUGGESTIONS
• WE WILL DEVELOP A HUMAN SUB-SPECIESWE WILL DEVELOP A HUMAN SUB-SPECIES
• SPECIES HYBRIDIZATION WILL LEAD TO SPECIES HYBRIDIZATION WILL LEAD TO NEW FOOD SOURCESNEW FOOD SOURCES
• AMORTALITYAMORTALITY
• CHOICE OF CHILD’S SEXCHOICE OF CHILD’S SEX
• WE WILL BE ABLE TO HYBERNATE AND WE WILL BE ABLE TO HYBERNATE AND THUS TRAVEL LONG DISTANCES IN SPACETHUS TRAVEL LONG DISTANCES IN SPACE