Satoshi Nakamoto and the Origins of Bitcoin - arXiv

Satoshi Nakamoto and the Origins of Bitcoin – Narratio in Nomine, Datis et Numeris

There is a Story is in the Name, Dates and Numbers Jens Ducrée, School of Physical Sciences, Dublin City University, Ireland, email: [email protected]

Abstract The mystery about the ingenious creator of Bitcoin concealing behind the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto has been fascinating the global public for more than a decade. Suddenly jumping out of the dark in 2008, this persona hurled the highly disruptive distributed ledger technology “blockchain” that has added the missing native value layer to the internet. Purposely agnostic without advocating any old or fielding new names, this paper first identifies the degrees of freedom Satoshi Nakamoto had available in the design of Bitcoin, and in fabricating snippets of personal data. By interweaving the substantial collection of previous and new circumstantial with direct evidence, like relevant locations and happenings in history and at the time, a consistent skeleton of Satoshi Nakamoto’s biography transpires. The results underpin that the iconic creator of Bitcoin most likely encoded bits of information in his self-chosen alias, dates and blockchain parameters, which particularly point to the numbers 21 and 42, and the numeral systems used in Bitcoin’s framework. Moreover, a psychogram of a reclusive and capricious genius is drawn, which sheds new light on Satoshi Nakamoto’s background, mindset, pastimes, and penchant for puns; this study may also explain the motivation of his abrupt departure from the online community, his continuing abstinence from engaging with the Bitcoin community, and from reaping the fruits of his mindboggling wealth. From a history of science and technology perspective, such an altruistic sacrifice for the benefit of his brainchild is entirely unprecedented.

Introduction The now notorious pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto [1] stands for the remarkable inventor of one of the most ground-breaking innovations of the ongoing 21st century: the cryptocurrency [2] Bitcoin (tracker symbol: BTC) with its underlying blockchain [3] concept; this disruptive technology has enabled the “Web3” by equipping the internet with an innate value layer. Yet, even up after more than a decade after its launch in 2008/2009, only very little is known about this individual or group, who spent extraordinarily sophisticated efforts on hiding his/her/their true identity, biography, and whereabouts. Satoshi Nakamoto was only interacting with the community for about two years between the second half of 2008 and end of 2010, followed by a few emails to peers in spring 2011, before completely vanishing end of April 2011 without clear farewell or guidance message. Afterwards, Satoshi Nakamoto appears to have only surfaced with brief statements, one in an attempt to stop a media-driven manhunt for a Japanese-American sharing his “name”, and to intervene in a self-destructive civil war raging within the Bitcoin community; however, it has been arguable whether these postings even originated from the elusive architect of Bitcoin. Astonishingly, the mastermind of a banking revolution has (so far) never touched (any significant share) of his rather abundantly filled coffers of digital assets, which are estimated to be of the order of 1 million Bitcoin (BTC), and which he is assumed to have been hoarded in 2009 as the dominant miner on the nascent blockchain; assuming a trading pair of 20,000 US$ / BTC, these holdings roughly

correspond to a whopping 20 billion US$ at the time of writing, ranking him amongst the richest people on the planet. Some pundits forecast a (volatile) growth towards 100,000 US$ / BTC, 500,000 US$ / BTC, and even 1 million US$ / BTC, which would lift him, possibly before the end of the decade, to the top of the Forbes list of billionaires [4]. This is, to my best knowledge, the first time that the inventor of a “unicorn” technology that has reached a total value on the range of 1 trillion US$ has stayed completely anonymous, and abstinent from his massive fortune, fame and impact. This behavior starkly contrasting famous personalities like Bill Gates [5], Steve Jobs [6], Elon Musk [7], Mark Zuckerberg [8], Jeff Bezos [9], or Jack Dorsey [10] in the related IT/Web2.0 [11] space, or even other prominent blockchain pioneers like Vitalik Buterin [12, 13], Charles Hoskinson [14, 15], Gavin Wood [16, 17], Sam Bankman-Fried [18-20], Roger Ver [21], or Changpeng Zhao (“CZ”) [22, 23]. Numerous initiatives aimed to unravel the identity of Satoshi Nakamoto [24-45]. There is a short list of credible candidates [46-48] who are thought by the crypto community to have been capable of assembling Bitcoin in 2008; all of them, if still alive, feverishly deny. A wider circle of “suspects” has been more or less seriously “nominated” [33, 37, 38, 49-69], who would be severely contested by most experts. Also, many of these contenders has categorically dismissed their involvement; yet one Australian-born candidate shot up in December 2015; he stubbornly insists having been the main figure in orchestrating Bitcoin [30, 70-75], and even filed libel cases against those openly challenging his inventorship [76-83], and filed a large number of blockchain-relevant patents [84-86]. A slew of other names has been dropped over the years [7, 52, 60, 62, 87-108], without sustained traction or even consensus. At the end, and despite countless searches, we still do not know the person(s) behind the alias Satoshi Nakamoto; as a matter of fact, the crypto-community overwhelmingly agrees that this mythical genesis story bears great benefit for Bitcoin and its offspring, i.e., second and third-generation blockchains. While having published in the field of blockchain in recent years [109-117], the author of this article was neither pertaining to the cryptographer and cypherpunk scene during the birth of Bitcoin, nor is he affiliated with, or intends to specifically promote any of the potential candidates. He only had the opportunity to have conversations with select insiders, who tend to be very cagey and reclusive, asking for anonymity in the context of this work. This constellation bears the benefit of a rather unbiased, as much as possible evidence-oriented approach to create a Satoshi Nakamoto profile. As per the Latin part in its title alluding to the common crypto-motto “Vires in Numeris” (English: “strength in numbers”), most of the new contributions to the story presented here are chiefly derived from the name, dates and numbers set by Satoshi Nakamoto, and their connection to creation of the Bitcoin blockchain and its contemporary historical embedding. Moreover, the citations in the Bitcoin whitepaper [118] are examined. The author has therefore deliberately left out quoting names (that are not already circulating in the public), and also purposely refrains here from unveiling Satoshi Nakamoto’s real name, as he obviously chose to stay private, which ought to be respected. Still, for instance, from a history of science perspective regarding the flooding of the market with early mined BTC and intellectual property matters, and possibly for a sound risk analysis the future of Bitcoin and crypto, it is worth elucidating Satoshi Nakamoto’s biography, personality, motivations, and concerns. The idea that this game-changing person may (hopefully) still be among us, like a “guy next door”, is certainly enthralling. (A celebrity with a similar quest for anonymity is known in the scene of contemporary street art uses the pseudonym “Banksy” [119].) In such endeavor, this article has spotted several peculiarities that concern the free parameters Satoshi Nakamoto had, to a considerable extent, at his own discretion for defining his persona, and for setting the characteristics of the Bitcoin blockchain. While virtually all of these bits might be

coincidental when challenged in isolation, it seems that a substantial portion of them can be corroborated by multiple independent sources and trains of reasoning. Hence, by systematically compiling a tier of facts, ranking, and interpreting such circumstantial evidence [120], and relevant historical and contemporary events, it can be inferred that Satoshi Nakamoto wanted to play “brain games” with his audience. All of these “encrypted” pieces of information are undoubtedly not meant to disclose his formal identity; they rather reflect his propensity for witty riddles, which is not uncommon for a genius, and reveal facets of his mindset when conceiving, giving birth, nurturing, and weaning off his baby Bitcoin. After surveying the period when Satoshi Nakamoto was actively involved in Bitcoin between 2007/2008 and 2010/2011, important fragments of his personality and biography are compiled from various publicly available news outlets. Especially the choice of his pseudonym turns out to indicate a fondness for hidden messages. The next section covers the financial, legal and personal ambient in the build-up of inventing Bitcoin. Afterwards, the variable parameters Satoshi Nakamoto had available in setting up Bitcoin are detailed; it turns out that he might have particularly wanted to point towards the numbers 21 and 42, in combination with the binary system. Following the popular slogan “Vires in Numeris”, the following section, for the first time, makes a best effort to interpretate these cues from a background of math, alphanumeric systems, geometry, symbolism, history, and the sciences. Next, a context to relevant happenings in the world of media and sports is compiled before sorting this collection of leads. Finally, the most substantial parts of this assortment of novel circumstantial evidence are wrapped around a scaffold of other known information to assemble a possible biography and psychogram of Satoshi Nakamoto, a potential “person of the century”. Then examples of cryptologists showing good overlap with the attributes arising from this article is given. While this effort is, owing to the general paucity of hard facts, of highly speculative nature, it is actually highly unlikely that the real Satoshi Nakamoto would not display good overlap with the profile produced this way. Quite fascinatingly, and despite the fact that Bitcoin was published and launched rather recently in 2008/2009, and still “lives” on the internet, the methodology for unravelling its origins tends to resemble more the reconstruction of a long-lost ancient culture; this is unexpected in the age of information where data does not seem to ever get lost, and usually leaves an indelible digital trace. The problem is that the search quasi exclusively relies on sterile digital, rather than analog artefacts carrying some telling ”dirt”. The Appendix first gathers a ‘request for comment’ catalogue to Satoshi Nakamoto candidates, referring to the various, multi-facetted incidents raised in this article; next, an extended range of possibly relevant happenings in the context of Satoshi Nakamoto and Bitcoin regarding history, politics, economy, finance, society, art, science and sports during key years for Bitcoin is compiled. The final section of the Appendix collects fun facts about the potential meanings of numbers highlighted in this investigation. Note that due to the striking rarity of material in the form of vigorously peer-reviewed papers that are the best-practice in scientific publishing, the author decided to include (a selection of) the many webpages and online articles that have been produced over time, entirely independently from this work; these sources can, unfortunately, seldomly be properly validated, and may even be susceptible to manipulation, e.g., by Satoshi Nakamoto himself, or by an imposter and his promoters. Furthermore, as the topic is of highly interdisciplinary nature, the reader is referred to a rather unusually comprehensive repertoire of explanatory webpages, primarily to the English-language version of Wikipedia [121]. It is fully understood that the resulting, large number of citations that are interspersed into the text might slightly impair the reading experience; yet the author prefers to properly define topics;

furthermore, linking such an expansive base of information improves options for systematic data mining for verifying and improving the story presented here. Unless specified otherwise, the (European) date format DD/MM/YYYY is used throughout the text and references; note that specified dates may vary by ±1 day, depending on the time zone applied.

The Birth and Infancy of Bitcoin In July / August 2008, and thus just a few weeks prior to its launch, a “Satoshi Nakamoto” lunged, seemingly out of nowhere, onto the cryptographer scene when ostensibly finishing up his now famous Bitcoin whitepaper [118]; he used email addresses from highly privacy-oriented email servers, and found a way to anonymously register the domain bitcoin.org [122, 123] on 18 August 2008. Around these days, Satoshi Nakamoto contacted key stakeholders [124-127] about prior art and their proper citation in the field of digital currencies [128-131], which he was, if not part of a clever ploy, not (fully) aware of at that time. He stated that he had been working on Bitcoin since 2007, “Much more of the work was designing than coding.” [132] and ”Writing a description for this thing for general audiences is bloody hard. There's nothing to relate it to.” [133]. The initial reception of the Bitcoin whitepaper [118] on this cryptographer forum in November 2008 was overwhelmingly skeptical; only a handful of early adopters [47, 134-138] reacted during the first couple of weeks; even fewer programmers joined Satoshi Nakamoto in developing Bitcoin [47, 92, 138-143] in this embryonic period, and often bowed out quite soon. On 03/01/2009, the Bitcoin blockchain was kicked off with the Genesis block 0, [144, 145], which included the headline “The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks” [146] of the British newspaper “The Times” [147], followed by a (so far not conclusively understood) hiatus before publicly releasing Bitcoin v0.1 [148, 149] on 08/01/2009, and mining block 1 [150] on 09/01/2009 (note that dates may deviate depending on the global tie zone referenced to). The talismanic father of Bitcoin is assumed to have been a dominant miner in the first year 2009 according to the so-called “Patoshi patterns” [151, 152]. Moreover, Satoshi Nakamoto continued to actively participate in the cryptography mailing list, until he successively handed over the responsibility starting in mid-2010. On 12/12/2010 [153-157], i.e., after these roughly two years, Satoshi Nakamoto unexpectedly and unglamorously disappeared from all online fora with a posting “There’s more work to do on DoS, but I’m doing a quick build of what I have so far in case it’s needed, before venturing into more complex ideas. …” and final emails [158] containing “I've moved on to other things. It's in good hands with Gavin and everyone.” in April 2011. By then Satoshi Nakamoto had transferred the control over the Bitcoin project to Gavin Andresen [51]. From his follow-on email communication with select peers, it appears that Satoshi Nakamoto wanted to mature his still nascent baby “Bitcoin” within its small developer community, and was strongly opposed, and apparently even scared of enhanced public exposure; this manifested when Bitcoin was eyed by Wikileaks [157, 159-161] as a potential vehicle for bypassing its financial blockage in early 2011, and when the CIA [162] called for an informative meeting on Bitcoin that eventually took place in mid-2011. On Sunday, 26 April 2011 [162-164], Andresen informed fellow coders: “Satoshi did suggest this morning that I (we) should try to de-emphasize the whole ‘mysterious founder’ thing when talking publicly about bitcoin.” After this day, Satoshi Nakamoto stopped replying, even to personal emails of his own “trustees”. Bitcoiners pondered sorrowfully why he had departed. But by then his epic invention had become adolescent, living an autonomous life of its own. Part of Bitcoin’s long-term sustained success is often attributed to Bitcoin’s conservative strategy of deploying rather well-established and thoroughly field-tested, instead of highly advanced, but still experimental cryptographic methods.

A factor of Satoshi Nakamoto’s exit might have been that mailing lists are tough to cope with for the faint hearted; for instance, rudeness, lack of respect and strong opinions without room for compromise have led later to the notorious Bitcoin “civil war”, which drove out some early key stakeholders [51, 165], who both directly conversed with Satoshi Nakamoto. Gavin Andresen described Satoshi Nakamoto as “a brilliant coder, but it was quirky.” [166] Others believed that Nakamoto might have been a group: a highly accomplished security researcher [167], who competently scrutinized the Bitcoin code, stated that Nakamoto could either be a "team of people", or must definitely have been a "genius"; a developer, who had emailed Satoshi Nakamoto [168, 169], uttered the feeling “the code was too well designed for one person”. One of the first Bitcoin adopters [47], who helped Satoshi Nakamoto very early on with the code, is quoted: “I thought I was dealing with a young man of Japanese ancestry who was very smart and sincere. I've had the good fortune to know many brilliant people over the course of my life, so I recognize the signs.” [43]. There were some later messages [170, 171] sent from Satoshi Nakamoto’s email and online forum accounts, but their genuineness remains heavily disputed. Yet, it would be worth pondering why potential hackers did not make even more use of their power to speak in the name of Satoshi Nakamoto for the sake of their own interests, e.g., to unite or seriously damage the Bitcoin community, or to manipulate cryptocurrency markets. Strangely, the creator of Bitcoin chose not to include messages in the blocks he succeeded to mine, such as the headline of “The Times” in the genesis block 0 [144, 145], or in transactions issued from Bitcoin addresses attributed to him, a mechanism that is enabled by his blockchain’s intrinsic scripting language, while preserving his anonymity. Most remarkably, Satoshi Nakamoto seems to have never moved any (significant number of) coins, at least not from his about 1 million BTC he is firmly believed to have mined in 2009 [172] (but possibly from other addresses that he generated afterwards).

Personality & Bio Pseudonym The first choice of the mastermind of Bitcoin was evidently in his “name”, which is broadly acknowledged to represent an alias; otherwise, the tremendous accompanying measures to mask his identity would not have made any sense at all. His given (male) name “Satoshi” [173], as well as his last name “Nakamoto” [174], are quite common, predominantly in Japan; a (rather weak) connection to a historical figure sharing the last name, only, has been purported [175-177]. This family name could also represent a member of an Asian-American minority. Obviously, Satoshi Nakamoto selected a rather generic name and nationality, rather than just a fantasy, gender- and stateless online handle; this specific choice might indicate his intent to tailor a message through this artificial character. Note that in the Japanese and other Asian cultures, the order of the two names is reversed, i.e., he would be called Nakamoto Satoshi, and his initials would read as “NS”. To the author’s best knowledge, at least the (full) name is not inspired by a renowned historic figure or fictional character in the Japanese or global culture. The singular of the pseudonym implies a male individual, not a team; the immense effort to coordinate and eternally protect a cover among multiple conspirators also suggests the hypothesis of a single actor. Yet, it has been purported [178] that an agent from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) [179, 180] interviewed Satoshi Nakamoto in the context of Bitcoin and illicit online markets, and reportedly met a group of four men in California. The credibility of this second source cannot be verified, and also the names of the group members have not been revealed in the feed. Some speculation spawned around the team [104-108, 181-183] involved in setting up what later became the cryptocurrency Ripple (XRP) [184-186].

If Satoshi Nakamoto was indeed a moniker for a group, the durability of their bullet-proof collusion pact must have been fortified by a vigorously sanctioned agreement or self-commitment, e.g., to protect against the threat of prosecution by a federal agency, or to shield significant financial interests. Thus, for the sake of this paper, we consider Satoshi Nakamoto a single male (he/his), even though it could also be part of a “red herring” strategy to mislead about gender, or to conceal a party of contributors. Notably, to the author’s best knowledge, all candidates pitched as Satoshi Nakamoto (so far) are men. The pseudonym also leaves room an interesting aspect. There is some significant scope for its translation from Japanese into English; “Satoshi” may be translated as intelligent history [187], knowledge, or wisdom [188, 189]. The initial syllable “Naka–” of his last name can be rendered as “being within”, “between or in the middle of something” [190]. The final part “-moto” constitutes a common terminus of Japanese family names; “Nakamoto“ may stand for "the origin, the cause, the foundation, the basis" [191]. As a faint hint, reversal (and minor deletion / insertion) yields “Ottomakan”, possible hinting to the historic Ottoman Empire [192] (1299-1922), and thereby a connection to modern Turkey (Republic of Türkiye) [59, 193]. In absence of reference to a known figure, and in the context of Bitcoin and ideological spirit, the chosen pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto might thus reflect a self-description which may be construed as “a genius who is highly focused on work to disrupt the foundations (of the established banking system)”. The entire stage name may also be creatively understood as “central intelligence”.

Moreover, it is worth pointing out that in Chinese, Satoshi Nakamoto may be read as “the wise one of Chinese currency” [194, 195]. It is indeed reported that three-letter agencies like the CIA [196], DIA [197], NSA [198], or other entities pertaining to the United States Intelligence Community [199], the FBI [200], or their international equivalents [201-207] and hybrids [208, 209], have, by the secretive nature of their own service, the vital importance to military communication [210], or by eavesdropping on their targets, a keen interest in cryptography, and are (nowadays) likely to be involved in cryptocurrencies [211]. However, it is widely believed to be unlikely that such governmental institutions have directly instigated Bitcoin [212], at least not as part of their remit as a public agency. Nevertheless, their former or present (renegade) staff, or their external service providers, might have gained sufficient knowledge of technologies and methods to pull off Bitcoin in a self-driven after-work or post-contract initiative. This hypothesis was also advocated by insiders the author communicated with under the condition of their anonymity.

Overall, given these semantics and their fit to a personality required to realize Bitcoin, the choice of the stage name Satoshi Nakamoto does not seem to be pure coincidence; in fact, it made the author curious about further revelations that he might have encoded. Just to mention that the Bitcoin and crypto advocate Elon Musk [7], presumably as a good joke, considered Satoshi Nakamoto as an acronym for large Korean, Japanese, Chinese, and US-owned companies / conglomerates SAmsung [213], TOSHIba [214], NAKAmichi [215], and MOTOrola [216] – as a highly gifted individual, Musk certainly enjoys spotting patterns.

Ideology Cypherpunk Movement From his very motivation to engage into the monster effort of creating Bitcoin, as well as from his interactions with the community, it can be deferred that Satoshi Nakamoto was distinctively contemptuous of the legacy financial system, as expressed by the citation in the genesis block, and

may have shared the ideologies [217] which were a signature of the cypherpunk [218, 219] movement: libertarianism [220], crypto anarchism [219], and Austrian economics [221]; however, his whitepaper and postings do not reveal much of this mindset, they rather feature a very rational and respectful, possibly somewhat altruistic “techie” who engages in expert discussion, rather than acting as a principally business-minded entrepreneur or hot-headed missionary for the cypherpunk ideology. His libertarian attitude shines through rather rarely in postings like [222] (07/11/2008) “Yes, [we will not find a solution to political problems in cryptography,] but we can win a major battle in the arms race and gain a new territory of freedom for several years. Governments are good at cutting off the heads of a centrally controlled network like Napster, but pure P2P networks like Gnutella and Tor seem to be holding their own.” on 07/11/2008, and [223] “It's very attractive to the libertarian viewpoint if we can explain it properly. I'm better with code than with words though.” on 14/11/2008. His lead motive for developing Bitcoin his lack of trust in banks [224].

Anguilla Meeting About 200 e-Gold [225, 226] founders was held around a beach in Anguilla [227] in February 2000 [228, 229]. They wanted to develop a strategy for promoting a new currency system that could challenge central banks. E-Gold was a digital gold currency that folded in 2007 after its founders were indicted by the United States Justice Department. Skeptics argue that Satoshi Nakamoto lacked bias in implementing new technology [44].

Mysterious “X” A number of libertarian-minded statements were posted on 9 & 10 December 2002 by an entity “X” under the topic “Virtual peer to peer banking” on the Usenet [230] groups alt.internet.p2p and uk.finance [231]. Their later (re-)discovery in the context of the origins of Bitcoin sparked fiery speculation on Reddit [232] and Bitcointalk [233] whether these postings originated from the person later filing under the pseudonym “Satoshi” Nakamoto” [25].

Indeed, the text bits [234-236] “idea of a future with virtual peer to peer banking”, “fixed total amount of money”,” virtual coin”, “deflation would replace inflation”, the “community can bypass the old powers (countries and governments)”, “new p2p system”, ”current monetary systems were mainly backed with gold”, “virtual peer to peer system could be other scarce resources, relatively easy to exchange via internet”, “computer processing power, bandwidth and data storage”, “virtual currency”, “replace the system operator by a secure peer to peer system”, “replace the underlying currency with something else, or slowly uncouple the underlying currency” exhibit many attitudes, objectives and features that entered Bitcoin a few years later in 2008/2009. Whether “X” was the individual later masquerading as “Satoshi Nakamoto” could (so far) not be verified. The posts of “X” were traced back [25] to IP addresses [237] in the Netherlands [238, 239], and thus put the spotlight on some regional cryptographers [54, 87].

Date of Birth Satoshi Nakamoto populated a profile on his personal page at the P2P Foundation [240, 241]. Apart from his nationality or residency in Japan, he provided 05 April 1975 as his date of birth. The real Satoshi Nakamoto is unlikely to be born on this very day, as this would resemble publishing his passport number. The reason is that there are 365 options for the day of the year, and – say – 100 cryptographers globally who could possibly have developed Bitcoin. So given that dates of birth are rather overt biodata which commonly resides in several unsafe online databases, especially considering that federal agencies possess a backdoor to public administration, it would most likely lead to only one match per year of birth.

Furthermore, as Satoshi Nakamoto most likely wanted to convey a message through his alias, he probably also opted to put a meaning into his day of birth. Other than the arrival of the creator of Bitcoin on the planet, there are not many associated happenings that caught the attention of the global news on that very day [242], except that it was a Saturday in 1975, possible referring to his chosen given name. Still, there was a sequence of potentially relevant events in the two days prior to Satoshi Nakamoto’s birthday [243] (see also Appendix). On 03 April 1975, the chess genius Bobby Fischer [244] very surprisingly declined to play in a chess match against Anatoly Karpov [245] in Manila [246] (The Philippines), thereby turning down a chance to receive a premium of more than USD 1.5 million. He thus became the first world chess champion to willingly forfeit this most prestigious trophy. Bobby Fischer’s rather odd behavior shows amazing parallels to Satoshi Nakamoto’s sudden withdrawal in 2010/2011, and his ongoing abstinence from reaping the future of his 1-million BTC fortune. On 04 April 1975, Bill Gates [5] and Paul Allen [247] founded “Micro-Soft“ [248], a sea-change moment for the modern age of information. Age This self-claimed birthday features two constituents. The year 1975 tethers him to the so-called Generation X [249], and infers a “credible” age of 33 years around the time he was issuing the Bitcoin whitepaper [118] and the Genesis block [144] in later 2008 / early 2009. A lot of great inventors were at the prime of their creativity in the 30-50 age envelope [250], and that at this stage in life people tend to have garnered sufficient personal life experiences and professional competences to form strong opinions, and to execute on effective solutions. Like Satoshi Nakamoto, also the English computer scientist Tim Berners-Lee (“TimBL”) [251] was 33 years old when he proposed an information management system in 1989 via the Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) [252]. His invention seeded the World Wide Web (“WWW”, “Web1.0”) [253], the technology that has most drastically changed lives of people, societies and economies forever, which might have been on Satoshi Nakamoto’s agenda with Bitcoin as the “Internet of Value”. Satoshi Nakamoto could have certainly shifted the (final one or two digits of) the year he claimed to have been born, so maybe somewhere between 1960 and 1990, but probably not much farther. Combining his assumed age and his gradual exodus from the Bitcoin community, it is unlikely that Satoshi Nakamoto is mentally incapacitated, or has deceased in the meantime.

Year The year 1975 [254] was marked by a few potentially related events (see also Appendix), such as the Watergate scandal [255], the end phase of the Vietnam war [256], both shattering the US government in Washington DC. Some less likely connections were that the Rockefeller Commission issued its report on CIA abuses [257], the signing of the Helsinki Accords [258], which officially recognize Europe's national borders and respect for human rights, the approval of the bailout of 6.9 billion total USD for New York City [254], and the coining of the term “fractal” [259] by the Polish-born French-American mathematician and polymath Benoit Mandelbrot [260].

Day in History The situation is much different for the particular day in the past [261]. Blaise de Vigenère [262], a French cryptographer, diplomat, translator and alchemist was born on April 05 in 1523. Kurt Cobain [263], the enigmatic, anti-establishment artist, singer and angst-fueled songwriter of the American grunge rock band Nirvana [264] from the Seattle music scene [265], an iconic figurehead of Generation-X [249], committed suicide on 05 April 1994. Most conspicuously for Bitcoin, during the Great Depression [24, 266] in 1933, US-President Franklin D. Roosevelt [267] signed the Executive Order 6102 [268, 269], which made it illegal for American

citizens to privately own gold; this ban was not lifted for more than 40 years later by US-President Gerald Ford [270], effective on 31 December 1974. By virtue of his (surmised) ideology, Satoshi Nakamoto certainly had a keen interest in monetary history, and was concerned how individuals could preserve their personal wealth and keep it safe from state intervention [271]. His deliberate choice of April 05 is likely to be related to this event as Satoshi Nakamoto is accredited the quote “I was born when sound money was made illegal in the USA” (which, formally, suggest an earlier date of birth). Even more, an immediate precursor of Bitcoin is dubbed “Digital Gold”.

Sakura A cherry blossom also known as Japanese cherry or “Sakura” [272]. Bloom typically occurs between March and April in the Northern Hemisphere; the exact date depends on factors like the species, climate, weather and geographical location, but a date around April 05 is not uncommon. In Japanese Shinto-influenced mythology [273], cherry blossoms symbolize clouds due to their nature of blooming en masse, besides being an enduring metaphor for the ephemeral nature of life.

First Contact Day In the Star Trek sequel [274], the first interactions between humans and Vulcans “took” place on 05 April 2063 [275]. Sci-fi aficionados celebrate this “historic” event on this day of the year [276].

Privacy & Anonymity As a mere fact that, even until today, i.e., nearly 1.5 decades after the release of the Bitcoin whitepaper in fall 2008, and despite major efforts to track him, Satoshi Nakamoto’s identity has not been unraveled; this impressively proves that he was able to employ sophisticated methods to persistently protect his anonymity. Using a pseudonym was only one part of it. As Satoshi Nakamoto, he never communicated through analog channels like voice, video or personal meetings; instead, he exclusively messaged electronically via email, and postings to online newsgroups. Moreover, Satoshi Nakamoto employed technologies like the Tor [277] (“The Onion Router” [278], a free and open-source software for enabling anonymous communication) network [278, 279] and I2P [280] (“The Invisible Internet Project”), he somehow found a way to register bitcoin.org [122, 123, 281] incognito with a prepaid credit card [92, 281], established email accounts at highly privacy-focused domains like vistomail.com [282-284] (defunct as per time of writing) and anonymousspeech.com [285-287] (shut down on 30/09/2021) for concealing his identity and location. These capabilities clearly display the signature of an experienced, very privacy-conscious character versed in skills which are actually quite common among cryptographers, but somewhat rare in other circles. As per the whole setup of his persona, per his strict adherence to online communication and his avoidance of live, in-person interaction, and his sudden disappearance from the community, it is obvious that Satoshi Nakamoto was somewhat abrupt in his decision making, and very solitary; he carefully avoided the limelight by expressing that others, like fellow developers from the steadily growing Bitcoin community, should represent the emerging cryptocurrency project in public. It might also be inferred from the still ongoing success in maintaining his privacy and anonymity over long periods of time, and by his prolonged abstinence from reaping the fruits of his incredible wealth, fame and impact, that Bitcoin was unlikely to have been created by a group. Note that, in principle, Satoshi Nakamoto could have, and actually still can, include short texts in transactions (through a 40 Byte metadata by the Bitcoin script command OP_RETURN [288]); if they are issued from Bitcoin addresses the community widely accepts to be owned by him, such messages would surely send some ripples to developers and markets. But Satoshi Nakamoto has (so far) never

tapped this pseudonymous communication channel that is incorporated into his own Bitcoin (node) software.

Cryptography Highly gifted mathematical people that are keen on preserving their privacy are regularly drawn into the fascinating field of cryptography. Other than the general public who are mostly careless of how comprehensively data on their internet-connected devices and online activities are systematically tracked, analyzed, and monetized, cryptographers tend to be highly competent in protecting their data, and to conceal their identity. Measures of cover up, like the anonymous registration of website domains and email addresses by Satoshi Nakamoto, as well as air-gaped data storage, are believed to be in the standard repertoire of privacy-driven cryptographers.

Scientific Publishing In his whitepaper that was released to the “Cryptography” mailing list on Halloween 2008 [289] (or 01/11/2008 in Japanese time zone), Satoshi Nakamoto outlines all key technical elements of his invention in a flawless style of writing, and a logically very well-arranged train of thought in the content and order of his sectioning; this observation displays the clear fingerprint of a genius who can compellingly reason the essential technical components and their astute interplay leading to his masterpiece. Nevertheless, he wrote on 14/11/2008 “I'm better with code than with words though.” [223]. Satoshi Nakamoto also distinctively abstained from interweaving technical parts of his Bitcoin whitepaper with (personal) ideology, such as the Cypherpunk manifesto [218, 219], clear anti-banking, or anti-government attitudes. Strong statements, or hate speech, are absent, also in his later emails and postings, which complies with sound practice and etiquette in scientific publishing. Note that the Bitcoin whitepaper, which never went through peer-review, represents the only publication-like document that can be uniquely attributed to the person known as Satoshi Nakamoto. The writing style of the Bitcoin whitepaper has been analyzed from a linguistic perspective [290, 291]. Amongst the candidates proposed at the time, it finds an overlap with the inventor of Bit Gold [48, 127, 292, 293]. Yet, the candidate sharply denies, and also arguments that he was not a proficient coder and never implemented a cryptocurrency have been raised. Somewhat surprisingly, the bibliography [129, 130, 294-299] turned out to be rather short, selective and incomplete from a traditional scientific publishing point-of-view, e.g., by even missing out pioneering work on electronic cash [49, 131, 300], and its presumably closest precursor Bit Gold [127, 292, 293]. In addition, the composition of the list is uncommon, with only one reference to a publication in a peer-reviewed journal [295], four papers from proceedings of US and European conferences in 1980 [298] and the 1990s [294, 296, 297], two web links [129, 130], and an archaic first edition of a standard textbook [299].

Benelux Symposium Especially the second citation [98, 99, 294] would have surely raised eyebrows along the review process submission of a classical journal. On the one hand, it presents rather preliminary work compared to the other references. Furthermore, according to its proceedings [301] issued by the “Werkgemeenschap voor Informatie- en Communicatietheorie (WIC)”, this symposium seems to have primarily attracted local researchers from the Benelux [239]; such meetings tend to serve networking purposes. Submissions are usually not vigorously peer-reviewed, and important findings are expected to be elaborated to full-fledged journal publications in the follow-up. The corresponding citation in the whitepaper (which was, in a similar way, also presented at another conference [98, 302] in Stanford [303]) was thus rather poorly noticed, and hardly findable and retrievable by a global audience. Hence, it looks like Satoshi Nakamoto himself, or at least a person

close to him, must have personally attended this “20th Symposium on Information Theory in the Benelux” on 27-28 May 1999 in Haasrode, Belgium, a location within the strong research ecosystem of KU Leuven [304], UCLouvain [305], UCLL [306], and IMEC [307]. There was one gifted cryptographer that has been affiliated with a local KU Leuven [37, 38, 54, 308]; his PhD supervisor David Chaum [49, 131], who was based UC Berkeley [309, 310] and Los Angeles [311], is of the pioneers of digital currencies [131, 300], reaching way back in the early 1980s; his (former) graduate student sadly decided to end his young life at the age of 31 in July 2011, i.e., just weeks after Satoshi Nakamoto sent his last known email (of widely undisputed origin) on 26 April 2011 [312, 313]. Blockchain Pioneers Out of the (only) eight citations, three (citations [3-5]) are directly from the team around the fathers of blockchain [295-297], and one (citation [2]) [294] is largely based on their work on timestamping in the early 1990s, which is foundational for Bitcoin’s blockchain technology. Astonishingly, none of these four references appears in [6] on hashcash [129, 314].

Merkle Trees Also the seventh citation [298], a contribution to a 1980 symposium held in Sunnyvale (San Francisco Bay Area [310], California, USA), would have been rarely included 28 years later by an author in the year 2008. This work on so-called “Merkle trees” [315] roots in a 1982 [316] patent that was filed in 1979. The technology has been outlined best in a 1987 book chapter [317], which would probably have been the most retrievable and usable reference for the reader of the Bitcoin whitepaper [118]. 1957 Edition of Textbook Moreover, the last of the eight citations [299] pops into the eye as it refers to a standard (2-volume) textbook “An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications”; the Bitcoin whitepaper cites its 1st edition from 1957. In Satoshi Nakamoto’s (proposed) lifetime, the mid-19th century hardcopy must have been mainly available in antiquarian bookstores. If the content of this book was essential in assembling Bitcoin for Satoshi Nakamoto, who supposedly read this source not earlier than in the 1990s, he would have normally referenced its much more recent editions from around 1970 [318], or even an alternative source. Unless it was part of personal collection, e.g., handed through generations within a family, this peculiarity might hint to the significance of the year 1957 [319], maybe referring to the beginning of the space age with the Soviet Sputnik [320] satellite, the start of the S&P 500 stock market index [321], or IBM releasing the first Fortran [322] compiler; otherwise, this citation might be attributed to a special relation or admiration of Satoshi Nakamoto (or his parents, family, friends, or mentors) to the author; William “Vilim” Feller [323] (1906-1970), a Croatian-born professor who eventually retired from Princeton [324], is widely remembered for pioneering probability theory as a branch of mathematical analysis. Or was the choice of the 1957 edition of the book just a pointer to Satoshi Nakamoto’s year of “birth” 1975 by swapping of the last two digits?

Odd Bibliography Overall, except for two citations on digital currency projects [129, 130, 314] that were, anecdotally, added, post scriptum, to the draft of the whitepaper in late summer 2008, most references precede the Bitcoin whitepaper by more than 10 years, and literally none of them is younger than 6 years; their average year of publication is situated before 1990, i.e., about 18 years prior to the release of the Bitcoin whitepaper [118]. Such a short and seasoned mix of citations, and its diverse caliber is unquestionably conspicuous, thus indicating that Satoshi Nakamoto tried to mimic scientific publishing, but did not possess an extended track record of active authoring in this arena; alternatively, he was simply not paying much attention

to academic etiquette, and just dropped a brief, “quick-and-dirty” list. It is therefore more likely that the person behind Satoshi Nakamoto came out of a relevant public agency or corporate background where he routinely studied scientific papers, but had seldomly spearheaded authorship of publications in top-quartile scientific outlets. It can also be firmly assumed that he avoided self-citations as this would have quickly jolted him on the list of suspects.

Professional Embedding So rather than a profound rooting in an academic research position, Satoshi Nakamoto might have had a (possibly brief) career in, or related to, cryptography in the corporate sector, or in a secret service institution. These organizations regularly recruit top (mathematical) talent, that they identify based on their educational scores, to their relevant departments. Before embarking him on a dedicated cryptography training, these three-letter intelligence agencies would have rigorously committed Satoshi Nakamoto to strict confidentiality over extended periods of time, even extending way beyond the actual duration of his employment or contract [325]. Such thoroughly monitored obligations might explain Satoshi Nakamoto’s apparent fear towards exposure of the nascent Bitcoin project to the CIA [196] in 2011. Personally, he might have even feared to be in breach of grave commitments to his confidentiality, which actually would prevent him from coming out for a long time, if not forever. It is also known that highly capable cryptographers would have generously paid options as freelancers or contractors in industry, or even on the dark side, which would elucidate why Satoshi Nakamoto might have had sufficient money to be able to abstain from monetizing his BTC assets after his sudden disappearance; furthermore, his ideals might have directed him towards leaving his (early) mined coins (so far mostly) untouched in order to bolster a narrative of a mysterious origin and innate decentralization that is indeed still deeply appreciated by “his” Bitcoin community.

Work Pattern Analysis of Satoshi Nakamoto’s postings to newsgroups and commits to the Bitcoin subversion repository in the final months of 2009 and 2010 [326] reveals activity peaks, involving “night shifts”, in February, a noticeable gap between March and May, and intensive activity over the following summer months. This fluctuating pattern may correspond to work obligations that are not compatible with a regular office job, but more for a student or academic who is busy on campus during lecture months in college, or a contractor, consultant or freelancer working along tight project completion schedules; even a seasonal schedule of a farmer has been purported. Due to the brevity of Satoshi Nakamoto’s online life, and his likely capability to forge metadata to disguise his identity and whereabouts, it cannot be ultimately concluded whether this calendrical, work-hour and time-zone patterns were just specific to the period of observation, or recurrent over consecutive years.

Nationality & Country of Residence The choice of his pseudonym would initially propose a Japanese person. People from other Asian backgrounds, like Koreans or Chinese, owing to certain historic events, some deeply rooted animosities, and clashes of culture, are less likely to voluntarily adopt a Japanese nationality. Actually, there is a train of evidence that Satoshi Nakamoto possesses a Western, presumably a British / Commonwealth or North-American nationality, or at least spent a good part of his formative years in these cultural habitats. In fact, virtually all (so far) seriously considered nominees originate from such countries where all or most people master the English language with native-level fluency, and might be well aware of the British culture and current affairs. Registering “The Times” headline in the Genesis block [144-146, 327] hints towards his state of mind and objective for Bitcoin, and possibly towards his cultural embedding within the realm of the United Kingdom of Great Britain, or the Commonwealth. The

expression “Chancellor” (of the Exchequer) [328], would be known in the USA as the “Secretary of the Treasury” [329]. This very pattern certainly matches Satoshi Nakamoto’s flawless mastering of the English language with a preference for British spelling, and preference for the European date format DD/MM/YYYY, both being uncommon for US-natives; yet, systematic timestamp and metadata analysis of his numerous online postings [163, 326, 330] indicate that, assuming rather normal (say midnight to 6 am) sleeping schedules (which is not necessarily applicable to coders and hackers having daytime college lectures, social activities, or jobs to pay their way), Satoshi Nakamoto was not residing in Japan, but moving across US (Eastern to Pacific) or British times zones during his post-2008 interactions with the online fora. Alternatively, the messages might have originated from a geographically spread company of authors, each of them potentially with their own writing style and spelling preferences. He also appears to have (deliberately?) changed his onboard computer clock between different American and British / GMT / Far-East time zones, implying frequent intercontinental travel. In addition, some inconsistencies in sent and receive times in personal emails Satoshi Nakamoto exchanged with Hal Finney regarding early code development in January 2009 were pointed out [137]. On 12/01/2009, Satoshi Nakamoto mentioned “Unfortunately, I can't receive incoming connections from where I am” [142], pointing to rural areas, or government-restricted blockage of select internet services. Yet, it might well be argued that, as an undoubtedly exceptionally sophisticated computer- and internet-literate who is evidently proficient in employing advanced privacy technology, Satoshi Nakamoto might have easily run message texts past spell and grammar checkers set to British English, tune computer clocks and time zone settings of operating systems, and manipulate sent times and forge metadata in email headers.

Still, if this is not a decoy, an evidently fabricated Japanese identity might be rooted in a link to this unique, Far-East country, like family, friends, or fondness of the rich, ancient, or modern East-Asian culture; for instance, the CEO of the notorious Bitcoin exchange Mt.Gox [94, 331, 332] in 2010 moved from his native country of France to Japan, as he was fascinated by Manga [333]. There is actually another interesting pointer towards Japan, specifically to its capital city of Tokyo. Satoshi Nakamoto frequently used, in addition to his account with the (Germany-based) provider gmx.com [118, 334, 335], the email domains anonymousspeech.com [285-287] (shut down on 30/09/2021) and vistomail.com [282-284, 336, 337] (defunct as per time of writing), for instance, on the “The Cryptography and Cryptography Policy Mailing List” when announcing the release of Bitcoin v0.1 [338].

These providers offered highly privacy-preserving email services, and anonymousspeech.com tempo-rarily accepted anonymous payment in e-Gold [225, 226, 339], and, anecdotally, later Bitcoin. In a story published by Business Insider in 2014 [92], several links, e.g., via domain registration addresses for email providers, bitcoin.org [122, 123, 340] and a Swiss bank account, were construed (via the American site godaddy.com [341]) via the elusive, (presumably) by the Swiss internet entrepreneur “Michael Weber” [336, 337, 342] ([email protected]), notably to Sakura House [336, 343, 344] and Lounge [344]. (Note that several insiders coherently commented that “Micheal Weber” might have just been a fake identify for covering up operations.)

These places, which are obviously named after the Japanese cherry blossoming, offer apartments and facilities that are preferentially rented by foreigners. Interestingly, the Sakura House and Lounge are situated near in the Nakano-sakaue station [345] for the Tokyo districts of Nakano [346] and Shinjuku [347], which are notorious amusement quarters that are well-known as gay hotspots (Shinjuku Ni-

chōme [348]), and for sex-related establishments (Kabukichō [349]). There was also several branches of the American fast fashion retailer “Forever 21” at the time in Tokyo and other parts of Japan [350, 351].

This intriguing plot constitutes one of the very few direct connections that could be quite convincingly established between Satoshi Nakamoto and Japan. (Other than that one of the founding fathers of blockchain [3, 352] who co-authored 3/8 papers cited in the Bitcoin whitepaper speaks Japanese.) In a conceivable scenario, Satoshi Nakamoto had a stint in Tokyo around the year 2006, staying at the Sakura guest house, possibly for studies, work, fun, or a combination thereof; during this period, Satoshi Nakamoto (re-)connected to the owner of the highly privacy focused email services anonymousspeech.com and vistomail.com who resided, or had his web portals registered to these facilities. Having enjoyed his time, Satoshi Nakamoto got inspired by the locality, i.e., specifically Sakura, Nakano and Nakano-sakaue, and the “Nakano Sakaue gang” [92] that was anecdotally reported to have been around in these locations the year 2006, to adopt his pseudonym from the first syllables of the local ambient. With all these cues at hand, it can be speculated that Satoshi Nakamoto likely has a Western educational and cultural background, either British / European or North-American, possibly pertaining to an ethnic minority, such as Japanese-American. In the years immediately prior to developing Bitcoin in 2007/2008, Satoshi Nakamoto might have stayed for a certain period, or at least immersed with an expat community in Tokyo that inspired his alias (possibly in addition to its “intelligence” related interpretation, see above). Other Japanese candidates were proposed in a 2017 presentation [98-100]. The senior author, who published a conference contribution [294, 302] referenced in the Bitcoin whitepaper [118], scrutinizes a 2001 publication entitled ““The Security Evaluation of Time Stamping Schemes: The Present Situation and Studies”” [103, 353], which is authored by a Japanese person affiliated with the Institute for Monetary and Economic Studies (IMES) from the Bank of Japan. The source finds stunning overlap between some core technological elements that later entered Bitcoin, as well as the references cited in their report and the Bitcoin whitepaper [118]. Moreover, the personal homepage of the author of the report [353] was last updated 09/02/2007, i.e., roughly around the time when Satoshi Nakamoto must have started building Bitcoin. Another Japanese candidate was proposed to have created Bitcoin in a rather quirky YouTube video [101] in 2013 by the American computer scientist and co-inventor of hypertext [257, 258]. However, these leads never seemed to have received significant traction in the community.

Interdisciplinary Skill Set In addition to his unquestionably outstanding (C++ [354]) programming abilities [166-168], as exhibited in the first version of the Bitcoin code [148], Satoshi Nakamoto must have, at least, had some advanced knowledge and passion for a rare combination of techno-scientific fields; this unusually wide interdisciplinary repertoire encompasses elements of computer science (e.g., distributed computing [355], peer-to-peer (P2P) networks [356], decentralization [357]), math (e.g., cryptography, probability theory, statistics), economics (e.g., game theory, financial systems, banking, monetary policies, market psychology), and law (e.g., financial regulation, freedom of speech). Regarding digital currencies, evidence stays inconclusive to which extent Satoshi Nakamoto was involved (under his real identity or another alias) in the cypherpunk [218, 219] movement that spawned in the early 1990s from the Bay Area [310] in California; his apparent (or mock) lack of awareness of (at least part of) related precursor projects [127-131] might be owing to the absence of a specialized scientific community and publishing scene on this cryptocurrencies at the time, but also linked to his (young) age in the 1990s. Furthermore, this apparent unfamiliarity with important prior

art reveals that intellectually, Satoshi Nakamoto may have even independently developed, or re-invented, key pillars of Bitcoin, while he was cognizant of the foundations of timestamping and blockchain [295-297, 352, 358, 359]. From a formal, intellectual property perspective, it is widely accepted [1] that Satoshi Nakamoto has authored the Bitcoin whitepaper [118] in 2008, and was part of Bitcoin’s original reference implementation. In the course of this, Satoshi Nakamoto devised the first blockchain database, through which he was the first to solve the double-spending problem for digital currencies using a peer-to-peer network.

Genius The various statements [166-168] of independent, highly recognized experts in conjunction with his spectrum of competences strongly underpin that Satoshi Nakamoto was an intellectual virtuoso, in particular if he was a fully self-driven individual [360].

Common Traits While there is no “one-fits-all pattern” for a genius, their outstanding talent is normally confined to a select area; their major commonality is that they are atypical, their overall character and psychology [360] regularly falls out-of-the-norm; a genius tends to have a peculiar sense of humor unsuitable for small-talk, he might be inclined to under- or oversell their sophisticated ideas, he shows major discontinuities in his private and professional life, with departures from projects that he considers delivered earlier than others, and may resurface with new, disruptive or unexpected initiatives that are primarily motivated by his portfolio of ideals; in particular highly gifted cryptographers often detest races for fame and for showing off their fortune; instead, they frequently have a preference for privacy, and even complete reclusion. They may have an apathy against testosterone-driven power games, e.g., within federal agencies, or the corporate world, and get easily frustrated when discovering that the main focus of initiatives they care about is not on factual solutions, but on personal career objectives. Why is this relevant? Well, it was clear from the early days that an outstanding genius [360] must have masterminded the creation of Bitcoin [361]. It is well known, and also shown by various examples, that many of such extraordinarily intelligent personalities clash with generic societal templates in terms of common behavioral traits, such as pronounced modesty, rather poor sociability, unusual sense of humor, and major volatility in their biographies; occasionally, their decision making is widely perceived as erratic, they may display signs of abnormal psychological conditions, or even a degree of mental disorder [362-365]. These rare species can intensively work long hours with extreme focus and persistence on solving extremely challenging problems they feel passionate about. They usually do not retire in a classical sense, their brain needs to offload its energy, for instance, via in interest-, or ideals-driven activities in business or leisure.

Strategic (Banking) Games As a characteristic for his intellectual capabilities, a genius stands out by their undeniable talent, resolve, and success, but he often does not meet societally widely accepted behavioral schemes. Furthermore, especially math-affine geniuses [295-297] are frequently endowed and identified with their extraordinary talent to quickly recognize patterns in arrangements of numbers, letters or geometries, and they might enjoy tackling and creating puzzles. This particular type of genius sometimes tends to have a penchant for strategic games involving statistics and memory (card counting, pattern recognition, complex strategies), such as the banking games Poker [366], Blackjack [367-369], as well as the table and board games Backgammon [370] and Chess [371] (or its Japanese variant Shogi [372]).

For instance, the prodigy chess player Bobby Fischer [244], who blended genius in the game as, for instance, documented by his world-famous 21-move brilliancy [373], with a rather turbulent professional and private vita, might have been one of Satoshi Nakamoto’s childhood heroes. It is known that a few such game-affine “superbrains” were banned at some stage from casinos in Atlantic City or Las Vegas, e.g., the notorious “MIT Blackjack Team” [374], which operated successfully from about 1980 to the beginning of the 21st century.

Celebrities There are numerous, historical and present-day ingenious celebrities, e.g., artists, actors, filmmakers and scholars, who are (sometimes arguably) reported to have displayed some (episodes of) mental abnormalities [365, 375], including bipolar disorder [376], schizophrenia [377], Asperger syndrome [378], and autism [379, 380]. Amongst the most famous personalities in science and technology are Isaac Newton [381, 382], Charles Darwin [383], Ludwig Boltzmann [384], Albert Einstein [385], Paul Dirac [386] , Nikola Tesla [387], John Nash [67], Richard Feynman [388], Grigori Perelman [389], Steve Jobs [6], Terry A. Davis [390], John McAfee [391], and Elon Musk [7, 392].

Financial, Legal and Personal Ambient Satoshi Nakamoto’s personal state of mind during the inception, creation, release, and maturation of Bitcoin along the years 2007-2010 might have been affected by other preceding and concurrent happenings that were, occasionally, less prominent in the mainstream media. For drafting his overall psychogram, also select, post-2010 events ought to be considered for Satoshi Nakamoto’s fairly abrupt and perplexing departure from the project. Note that the events mentioned in the following are primarily viewed from a Western / US-American / British / European angle.

Financial Crisis of 2007-2008 The harbingers of the global financial crisis are ascribed to events that took place in August 2007 in the world of banking [393], which may well have triggered Satoshi Nakamoto’s work on Bitcoin. The global financial crisis [394] further escalated during the year 2008 [395], peaking in the public perception with the filing of Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection [396] by the fourth-largest investment bank in the United States [397] on 15 September 2008; these dramatic events must have evidently been on the screen of Satoshi Nakamoto, as impressively recorded by the message he engraved into the genesis block 0 [144, 145] of the Bitcoin blockchain [144]; issued on January 03, 2009 [398], he included the headline of the British daily newspaper “The Times” [147]: “Chancellor on the brink of second bailout for banks” [146] of that very day. (It also resembled the timestamping methods [294-297] referenced in the Bitcoin whitepaper.)

Bernstein v. United States The notorious Bernstein v. United States series of court cases (1995-2003) [399] revolved about publication, and resulting export of cryptography technology from the United States, and the right of freedom of speech protected by the First Amendment [400] of the United States Constitution [401]. The plaintiff Daniel J. Bernstein has already been a top-notch cryptographer in the 2000s. The court initially ruled that software source code was speech and that the governmental regulations preventing its publication were unconstitutional; then the case was reopened, and on October 15, 2003, after almost nine years, the judge eventually dismissed the case and asked Bernstein, who then represented himself, to return when the government posed a "concrete threat".

Napster & Megaupload Satoshi Nakamoto also referred to Napster that was founded as an independent peer-to-peer file sharing service in 1999 [402, 403]. The legal challenges spearheaded by the music industry led to its

shutdown in 2001. Similar legal cases were emerging at the time [404]. The centralization issues Napster were referred to by Satoshi Nakamoto [222] only a week after the release of his Bitcoin whitepaper [118].

Currency & Securities Satoshi Nakamoto might also have been aware that the issuance of a cryptocurrency might bring about certain legal matters, for instance, with the (US) Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) [405], and with Article I, Section 8, Clause 5 of the US Constitution on the “Coinage Power of Congress” [406], or their international analogs.

Wikileaks In 2006, the whistleblower website WikiLeaks [159] was started, presumedly by Julian Assange [160, 407]. In 2007, the platform published the standard US army protocol at Guantanamo Bay [408]. There were further releases of classified papers in the pre-Bitcoin period 2006-2008 [409] and beyond, such as the disclosure of the 2010 "Iraq War Logs" [410] and "Afghan War Diary" [411] leading to imprisonment of the whistleblower who was assigned as intelligence analyst [412] to an Army unit in Iraq in 2009. The financial blockade of WikiLeaks in 2010/2011 triggered a discussion, including whether the Bitcoin community should promote BTC as alternative for funding in early 2011 (which eventually did not materialize). The ensuing public exposure and scrutiny of the Bitcoin project at its infant stage seriously concerned by Satoshi Nakamoto, and might even have prompted Satoshi Nakamoto’s gradual exit culminating with his final emails in April 2011 [164].

Bobby Fischer On 17 January 2008, the extravagant, world-champion (1972-1975) chess genius Bobby Fischer passed away [244] in Reykjavik (interestingly, but most likely coincidentally, bitcoin.org [122, 340] is currently registered to this capital of Iceland [340]). With a passion for games challenging his prodigy brain in childhood and teenage years, it can (arguably) be speculated that Bobby Fischer [244] has been the much-revered idol of an underage superbrain “Satoshi Nakamoto” spending his spare time on rehearsing Fischer’s chess strategies of the 1950s to 1970s. The young Satoshi would then have intensively studied “The Game of the Century” [413] of 13-year-old Bobby Fischer in 1956, and his first major titles in 1957 (which corresponds to the year of the last citation [299] in the Bitcoin whitepaper [118]), and admired his “21-move brilliancy” from 1963. Satoshi Nakamoto was certainly also aware of the abnormalities and tragedies within Bobby Fischer’s active days and post career, including his refusals to defend his lead in tournaments, his semi-retirements, forfeiture of title, sudden obscurity, detention, life as an émigré, eventually in Iceland. So how could Satoshi not have been moved by the demise of his childhood hero Bobby Fischer in early 2008?

Silk Road In February 2011, and pertaining to the dark web , was an online black market and the first modern darknet market website “Silk Road” [414] was started; operated as a Tor [278] hidden service, Silk Road attracted approximately 100,000 users. The FBI [200] shuttered the website in October 2014, and arrested its alleged founder Ross Ulbricht [93] alias "Dread Pirate Roberts". Satoshi Nakamoto occasionally pointed out that he did mention he did not want himself and Bitcoin to be associated with moral or economic “shadiness”; happenings around Silk Road might thus have deepened Satoshi Nakamoto’s choice for silence and anonymity over the years to come until now.

Keccak-SHA-3 Controversy In November 2007, the US National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) [415] launched a competition to develop a new hash function called SHA-3 to complement the older SHA-1 and SHA-2 [416]. On October 2, 2012, NIST announced KECCAK [417] as the winning algorithm to be standardized as the new SHA-3 [418]. In the follow-up, a “weakening controversy” [419] emerged in the cryptographer community, even including claims that a backdoor was introduced [420-422] in light of the documents leaked by the former NSA [198] employee and contractor Edward Snowden [95, 423] in 2013. As already revealed in the discussion regarding the CIA presentation of Bitcoin to the CIA [196] by Gavin Andresen [51] in summer 2011, Satoshi Nakamoto tended to be very cagey about exposure to Bitcoin by public investigation.

Bitcoin Parameters On their journey into Bitcoin, readers usually stumble across mysteries that they cannot make immediate sense of. These frequently concern the technical or practical reasoning for the choices of the (targetted) block time 𝑇𝑇B ≈ 10 min, the (maximum) block size 𝑆𝑆B ≈ 1 MB, the halving period of 𝑁𝑁H = 210,000 blocks, roughly corresponding to 𝑇𝑇H ≈ 4 years, the initial coinbase transaction 𝐶𝐶0 =50 BTC, and the (ensuing) total supply 𝑀𝑀tot = 21 × 106 BTC. Table 1 summarizes the “ambient”, fixed, free, and resulting design parameters of the Bitcoin blockchain as detailed in the following sections. The values of these parameters are not fully explained in the Bitcoin whitepaper [118]; yet, email correspondence between Satoshi Nakamoto and early adopters [424-426] details some objectives. The following considerations are unavoidably quite technical and mathematical, so the reader might fast-forward to the last subsection “Take-Home Messages” if not interested in the specifics.

Practically “Fixed” Parameters Block Time The block time 𝑇𝑇B = 10 min draws its technical rational from the latency for synchronizing the common ledger by message propagation time 𝑇𝑇P ≪ 𝑇𝑇B between nodes on an open and decentralized peer-to-peer (P2P) network [427]; it is already reasoned in optimizing the mining efficiency, i.e., that the nodes should not spend too much time on futile mining efforts when the next block has already been found [428]. For instance, with the 𝑇𝑇P ≈ 1 min = const. propagation time (which might actually not properly represent current internet and future internet speeds) assumed in Satoshi Nakamoto’s back-of-the-envelope calculations, about 𝑇𝑇P 𝑇𝑇B⁄ = 10% of the mining efforts would be deterministically ”wasted” due to delayed notification about the generation of a new, valid block during the final interval 𝑇𝑇P of 𝑇𝑇B. The block time 𝑇𝑇B thus constitutes a compromise between fast transaction processing on the one hand, and optimized power usage favoring longer periods 𝑇𝑇B for mining on the other. There is also a further, important practical aspect of 𝑇𝑇B associated with the quasi-finality of transactions, which are only deemed safely confirmed after a certain number of blocks were mined, for instance, 60 min = 6 × 𝑇𝑇B for six blocks. Hence, the block time 𝑇𝑇B cannot be randomly set when factoring in the requirements of Bitcoin as a payment system running on a distributed network. Note that 𝑇𝑇B = 10 min just represents a target value for the average block time measured over many periods; significant deviations have been recorded for individual block periods in the past [429].

Block Size A (𝑆𝑆B ≤ 1 MB) block-size limit, in conjunction with 𝑇𝑇B = 10 min, restricts the write speed 𝑊𝑊 =𝑆𝑆B 𝑇𝑇B⁄ of the Bitcoin blockchain’s distributed ledger to 1 MB/10 min. Hence, with 𝐵𝐵Y =(365.25 × 24 × 60) min 𝑇𝑇B ≈ 52.596⁄ blocks in a calendar year, the storage requirement of the

Bitcoin ledger increases by 𝑊𝑊 = 𝐵𝐵Y × 𝑆𝑆B ≈ 50 GB per annum. Faster write speeds 𝑊𝑊 would thus, over the course of time, oust a significant portion of non-professional contributors who volunteer to operate (full) Bitcoin nodes, and consequently, severely undermine Bitcoin’s pivotal concept of decentralization through prolific and unrestricted network participation. Such de-facto exclusion of contributors to the distributed ledger is averted under the condition that the storage space of commodity hard drives grows faster than the write speed 𝑊𝑊. This issue constituted one of the main disputes in the Bitcoin “civil war” in the mid-2010s, associated with the (eventually unsuccessful) Bitcoin XT [430] fork, and follow-ups like the controversial Bitcoin SV [431]. At the time of writing (mid 2022), i.e., about 13 years after its launch in 2009, the full size of the Bitcoin’s distributed ledger file ranges in the vicinity of 350 GB.

Transaction Throughput As the peer-to-peer payment system alluded to in the very title of its whitepaper [118], speed, measured in transactions per second (TPS), is a common benchmark. While each block has a maximum size of 𝑆𝑆B ≤ 1 MB, as engraved in the code, the storage space for each of its transactions varies, for instance, as they can contain different amounts of Bitcoin addresses and script commands, called opcodes [432]. Using an average size of 𝑆𝑆T ≈ 435 Byte, a (𝑆𝑆B = 1 MB) block typically contains about 𝑆𝑆B 𝑆𝑆T⁄ ≈ 2300 transactions. This coarse estimate provides a transaction speed 𝑊𝑊T = (𝑆𝑆B 𝑆𝑆T⁄ ) 𝑇𝑇B⁄ ≈ 4 TPS; the actual transaction speed is reported to be in the range between 3.3 and 7 TPS [433, 434]. Importantly, the throughput 𝑊𝑊T cannot be freely adjusted, but results from the fixed design parameters 𝑆𝑆B and 𝑇𝑇B, and the space needed for scripting a transaction on the Bitcoin blockchain 𝑆𝑆T. For comparison, the VISA network is capable of 𝑊𝑊T ≈ 60 × 103 TPS, which might be the reason why layer-2 solutions, such as the Lightening [435] or Liquid [436-438] networks, are, or have already been, developed and implemented for Bitcoin as fast, consumer-level payment solutions headlined in its whitepaper [439].

Halving Satoshi Nakamoto’s plot for Bitcoin was obviously to issue a finite supply of BTC. Mathematically, this somewhat clever and altruistic objective requires a special distribution function that converges to a fixed number over time. Amongst the many options for the BTC minting policy, he chose a stepwise adjustment which periodically halves the initial reward for the miner, called coinbase transaction.

Period The logic behind the halving interval 𝑇𝑇H ≈ 4 years is not immediately evident, other than its potential correspondence to the leap year schedule, or typical legislative periods of democratically elected governments. This peculiar choice might furthermore indicate Satoshi Nakamoto’s intent to maneuver in the binary domain, given that 4 = 2 × 2 = 22, i.e., doubling, and halving, or division by 2, relating to the fundamental multiplication operators (left- and right shifting) in the binary domain.

Block Count The ratio between the aimed halving period 𝑇𝑇H ≈ 4 years and the (target) block time 𝑇𝑇B ≈ 10 min yields a block count 𝑁𝑁H ≈ 𝑇𝑇H 𝑇𝑇B⁄ = 210,384, which is roughly represented by the more catchy number 𝑁𝑁H = 210,000 blocks, as hardwired in Bitcoin’s design parameters [424].

Initial Coinbase Transaction For the first, (𝑇𝑇H ≈ 4 year)-interval starting with block 0 [144] and 1 [150] on 03 and 09 of January 2009, respectively, the initial coinbase reward was set to 𝐶𝐶0 = 50 BTC. This particular value of 𝐶𝐶0 constitutes, at first glance, a rather arbitrary pick, in a sense that it does not hinge on practical arguments, like the block time 𝑇𝑇B and the (maximum) block size 𝑆𝑆B. Given that 𝐶𝐶0 = 50 BTC =

50 × 108 Sat is halved at intervals 𝑇𝑇H, a natural option might have been to express 𝐶𝐶0 by an amount to 𝐶𝐶ℎ = 2ℎ Sat, with an unsigned integer exponent ℎ ∈ ℕ, so that the final coinbase transaction would cleanly turn out as 20 Sat = 1 Sat = 10−8 BTC, before it drops below 1 Sat, which cannot be represented by the corresponding integer (token) variable on the Bitcoin blockchain anymore.

Environmental Parameters Propagation time (estimate): 𝑇𝑇P ≈ 1 min Calendar: 1 year ≈ 525,960 min Transaction size (mean): 𝑆𝑆T ≈ 435 B Global M1 in 2008: 𝑀𝑀1 ≈ 21 × 1012 USD Fixed Free Block time (target): 𝑇𝑇B = 10 min Initial coinbase transaction: 𝐶𝐶0 = 50 BTC

⇓ Adjustment period: 𝑇𝑇H ≈ 4 years ↦ Transaction “finality" after 6 blocks: 1 hour ↦ In blocks: 𝐻𝐻B = 𝑇𝑇H 𝑇𝑇B⁄ ≈ 210,000

↦ Mining efficiency: TP 𝑇𝑇B⁄ = 10% Adjustment algorithm: 𝐶𝐶ℎ = 𝐶𝐶0 2ℎ⁄ with ℎ = Integer(𝑏𝑏 𝐻𝐻B⁄ ) Block size (maximum): 𝑆𝑆B = 1 MB Smallest subunit: 1 Sat = 10−8 BTC

⇓ ⇓ ↦ Write speed: 𝑊𝑊 = 𝑆𝑆B 𝑇𝑇B ≈ 50 GB/year⁄ ↦ 𝑀𝑀tot = 2𝐶𝐶0 × 𝐻𝐻B = 21 × 106 BTC (1)

↦ Transactions / block (mean): 𝑆𝑆B 𝑆𝑆T⁄ ≈ 2300 ↦ 𝑀𝑀1 = 1014 cent ⋅⋅⋅ 1014 Sat = 𝑀𝑀tot

↦ Speed: 𝑊𝑊T = (𝑆𝑆B 𝑆𝑆T⁄ ) 𝑇𝑇B ≈ 4 TPS⁄ ↦ 𝑌𝑌fin = 𝑌𝑌ini + 𝑇𝑇H ⋅ (ℎfin + 1) ≈ 2142 (2) ↦ Inflation at block number 𝑏𝑏: 𝐼𝐼(𝑏𝑏) (3)

Table 1 Overview of Bitcoin design parameters which are reasoned by technical and practical aspects of a payment network on a decentralized, globally distributed public ledger in a real-world user environment. The values of the fixed parameters (target) block time 𝑇𝑇B = 10 min and block size (limit) 𝑆𝑆B = 1 MB determine the throughput in terms of transactions per second (TPS), the write speed 𝑊𝑊 in GB per year, and thus the storage needs of full network nodes. The initial coinbase transaction 𝐶𝐶0 = 50 BTC, the adjustment (halving) method 𝐶𝐶ℎ = 𝐶𝐶0 2ℎ⁄ and the period of 𝐻𝐻B × 𝑇𝑇B ≈ 4 years, and the smallest currency unit that can be captured on the blockchain of 1 Sat = 10−8 BTC are freely chosen to adjust the resulting total supply of 𝑀𝑀tot = 21 × 106 BTC (1), which has been speculated to relate to the M1 money in 2008 of 𝑀𝑀1 =21 × 1012 USD in terms of their indivisible subunits, and the (theoretical) year of the last mint 𝑌𝑌fin ≈ 2142 (2); the “inflation rate” 𝐼𝐼 as defined in (3).

Total BTC Supply Nowadays, the limit of 21 million BTC that will ever be mined is almost religiously cited among Bitcoin maximalists, and even a membership in the “21 million club” for those owning at least one BTC is popularized. The reasoning behind this rather mystical choice has rarely been discussed. Figure 1 displays the (approximate) evolution of the total supply available at a specific point in time after mining commenced in January 2009. The total BTC supply is calculated by

𝑀𝑀tot = 𝑁𝑁H(𝑇𝑇Y) × 𝐶𝐶0 × � 2−ℎ = 2 × 𝐶𝐶0 × 𝑁𝑁H(𝑇𝑇Y) = 21∞

ℎ=0

× 106 BTC

(1)

using the identity 1 2⁄ + 1 4⁄ + 1 8⁄ +⋯ = 1 [440]; 𝑀𝑀tot (1) is therefore completely determined by the product 𝑁𝑁H × 𝐶𝐶0 of the block cycle 𝑁𝑁H = 210,000 (determined by 𝑇𝑇Y, and the “fixed” block time 𝑇𝑇B), and 𝐶𝐶0 = 50 BTC. Yet, notice that the sum only converges for ℎ ↦ ∞, so 𝑀𝑀tot will actually fall slightly short of 21 × 106 BTC. (Note that Satoshi Nakamoto refrained from pre-launch mining, which might have tainted the public-good image of Bitcoin for fostering its wide-scale acceptance.) Consequently, and especially given that 𝑇𝑇Y cannot accurately correspond to full years anyway, it would have been very straight-forward to alter the total BTC supply from 𝑀𝑀tot = 21 × 106 BTC to a more

catchy number, like 20, 10, or a 100 million, or even 1 million or a billion to comply with the common scale systems [441]. The fixed total supply 𝑀𝑀tot (1) of BTC (not the chosen amount) was reasoned by Satoshi Nakamoto “In this sense, it's [Bitcoin is] more typical of a precious metal. Instead of the supply changing to keep the value the same, the supply is predetermined and the value changes. As the number of users grows, the value per coin increases. It has the potential for a positive feedback loop; as users increase, the value goes up, which could attract more users to take advantage of the increasing value.” on 11/02/2009 [442].

Figure 1 Total supply 𝑀𝑀tot (1) in terms of BTC minted as a function of the calendar year, assuming an initial coinbase transaction of 𝐶𝐶0 = 50 BTC, a block time 𝑇𝑇B = 10 min of, and a halving period of 𝑁𝑁H = 210,000 blocks.

Only a second source is cited in an email [425, 426] exchanged in January 2011 with an early adopter, who directly conversed with, and received BTC from Satoshi Nakamoto in spring 2009. It was surmised [165, 425, 426] that Satoshi Nakamoto’s choice of the 21 million of BTC was inferred from the (global M1) money supply [443] of fiat currencies 𝑀𝑀1, which (reportedly) amounted to roughly 21 trillion USD at the time of releasing the Bitcoin whitepaper in fall 2008. M1 money comprises of all the currencies and assets that can easily be converted into cash.

Satoshi Nakamoto is quoted: “I wanted to pick something that would make prices similar to existing currencies, but without knowing the future, that’s very hard. I ended up picking something in the middle. If Bitcoin remains a small niche, it’ll be worth less per unit than existing currencies. If you imagine it being used for some fraction of world commerce, then there’s only going to be 21 million coins for the whole world, so it would be worth much more per unit.”

From a pure quantitative point of view, this makes sense as the two smallest (integer) units, i.e., cents (1 ¢ = 10−2 USD) and 10−8 BTC = 1 Sat, we mathematically obtain 𝑀𝑀1 = 21 × 1012 USD =21 × 1014 ¢, and 𝑀𝑀tot = 21 × 106 BTC = 21 × 1014 Sat for Bitcoin. However, the correlation between the two underlying quantities is very fuzzy, and might not align well with the other brilliant logic and expertise demonstrated by Satoshi Nakamoto. (Another article [444] tabled that a total supply in the region or 21 million BTC would be favorable towards minimizing rounding errors when

operating in the realm of a 64-bit floating-point arithmetic [445]. The author of this work does not follow this argument.) However, in a different email [424], Satoshi Nakamoto disclosed to have played a bit with this number, initially considering 42: “I thought about 100 BTC = 2 × 𝐶𝐶0 and 42 × 106 BTC = 2 × 𝑀𝑀tot, but 42 million seemed high.” The notion “seems high” does not make much sense, if 21 is eventually chosen. Also note that the adjustment by the factor ½ refers, similar to the halving period, to the binary system. In fact, following formula (1) for 𝑀𝑀tot, the first coinbase transaction 𝐶𝐶0 could have been shifted over a wide range without compromising the fundamental mechanisms underlying the Bitcoin blockchain.

In addition, revisiting equation (1), the total supply 𝑀𝑀tot = 21 × 106 BTC could have also been preserved by a more “intuitive” annual cycle, i.e., 𝑇𝑇Y = 1 year and 𝑁𝑁H(1 year) ≈ 𝑁𝑁H(4 years) 4⁄ =52,500 blocks, by multiplying 𝐶𝐶0 by the same factor, i.e., 4 × 𝐶𝐶0 = 200 BTC. Hence, the latter communication sheds doubt of the exclusivity of the (alleged) reasoning of 𝑀𝑀tot by the global M1 money supply 𝑀𝑀1; it rather indicates that there may be (additional) motivations for the prominence of the number 21. This circumstance will be further expanded in the following sections.

Final Block Starting with the initial mining reward of 𝐶𝐶0 = 50 BTC = 50 × 108 Sat, we can extrapolate the number of halving periods ℎ required to mint (nearly) all BTC, terminating when the coinbase transaction 𝐶𝐶ℎ = 𝐶𝐶0 × 2−ℎ slips below 1 Sat; this final period ℎF is obtained by solving

𝑀𝑀tot = 𝐶𝐶0 2ℎfin⁄ ≤ 1 Sat ⇔ ℎfin = log𝐶𝐶0/Sat

log 2≈ 32.22 (2)

and with a (roughly) (𝑇𝑇H =4-year) halving interval (more accurately 𝑁𝑁H = 210,000 blocks) starting with the genesis (or first) block in January of the year 𝑌𝑌ini = 2009, i.e., in the 21st century, we approximate the final non-vanishing coinbase transaction (note that miners will continue to receive transaction fees) to be issued in 𝑌𝑌fin = 𝑌𝑌ini + 𝑇𝑇H × (ℎfin + 1) ≈ 2141.88 ≈ 2142, which is in the same region as quoted elsewhere [446]. Intriguingly, the digits of this iconic year start with a 21, and end with a 42 = 21 × 2, just like Satoshi Nakamoto’s final choice and initial idea for 𝑀𝑀tot, respectively.

Trivially, choosing a “more natural” annual halving period 𝑇𝑇H′ = 1 year would have adjusted the final year to 𝑌𝑌fin′ = 𝑌𝑌ini + 𝑇𝑇H′ × (ℎfin + 1) ≈ 2042, so about a century earlier than with the original Bitcoin parameter 𝑇𝑇H = 4 years. However, retention of the same year 𝑌𝑌fin for the last coinbase transaction 𝐶𝐶ℎ ≥ 1 Sat around 2142 could have been arranged by annual halving cycles ℎ′ calculated by 𝑌𝑌ini +𝑇𝑇H′ × (ℎfin + 1) + ℎ′ = 𝑌𝑌fin ⇒ ℎfin′ = 132; however, this choice of 𝑇𝑇H′ = 1 year would have resulted

in a huge number for the adjusted initial coinbase transaction 𝐶𝐶0′ = 𝐶𝐶0ℎfin′ −ℎfin ≈ 𝐶𝐶0100, which would

fall far outside the scope of integer-type variables that are common in computer storage.

Inflation Rate For multiple reasons, a classical inflation rate is hard to define. First, Bitcoin started without exclusive pre-launch mining (except the genesis block) by its creator, i.e., from an initial BTC amount of literally zero in January 2009. Second, the BTC supply is not continuously increased by a government to implement certain fiscal policies and to satisfy consumer psychology, but by the need to secure a decentralized ledger on a blockchain. Furthermore, it is not clear how the transaction fees, which will likely rise in their fiat value over time, should be factored in. Finally, with increased minting of new BTC and halving cycles, the inflation rate decreases until it deterministically merges to zero (i.e., below BTC’s non-divisible subunit of 1 Sat). Note, however, that fading rewards for participating in the crucial proof-of-work [447] competition

will have to be compensated, to some degree, by transaction fees to still incentivize miners in the PoW-secured [447] public ledger. Mathematically, we can define an (annual) inflation rate at block number 𝑏𝑏 in the halving interval numbered by ℎ(𝑏𝑏),

𝐼𝐼(𝑏𝑏) =𝐶𝐶�ℎ(𝑏𝑏)� × 𝑇𝑇H

4.25 year𝑀𝑀tot(𝑏𝑏)

(3)

with 𝑀𝑀tot(𝑏𝑏) minted so far at block number b, starting with 𝐶𝐶(ℎ) = 𝐶𝐶0 × 2−ℎ and 𝐶𝐶(ℎ = 0) = 𝐶𝐶0 =50 BTC with the Bitcoin genesis block 𝑏𝑏 = 0 (or 𝑏𝑏 = 1) in January 2009. This ratio (3) may be understood as the inflation rate 𝐼𝐼(𝑏𝑏) at block number 𝑏𝑏. The (logarithmic) plot in Figure 2 shows the development of the Bitcoin “inflation rate” 𝐼𝐼 (3) over the (𝑇𝑇H ≈ 4 years) halving periods, commencing with 𝐶𝐶0 = 50 BTC. The calculations are based on a constant block time of 𝑇𝑇B ≈ 10 min; this is just a target value which deviates in practice from the actual block time [429]. The calendar years on the horizontal axis are thus not in exact sync with the present state of the Bitcoin blockchain.

Figure 2 BTC inflation rate 𝐼𝐼 (logarithmic scale) over calendar time calculated according to the method quantified in (3).

Just as an example, at the time of writing (in 2022), and assuming a constant block time, we are within the 4th halving period (see vertical line) when about 19 out of the a total 𝑀𝑀tot (1) of 21 million BTC have already been issued, and the inflation rate (3) amounts to about 1.75%, dropping below 1% in the second half of the 2020s, and completely vanishing after the final Sat token had been issued around the year 2142. An alternative choice with an annual adjustment of the coinbase transaction while maintain the year 2142 for its last, non-vanishing value is displayed in Figure 3.

Figure 3 Evolution of (annual) inflation rate 𝐼𝐼 (logarithmic scale) if the coinbase transaction 𝐶𝐶ℎ was adjusted by a factor 2−1 4⁄ each year (𝑇𝑇H = 1 year) with respect to equation (3) and, thus effectively producing a halving every 𝑇𝑇H = 4 years as in Figure 2.

Parameter Analysis The set of Bitcoin parameters is composed of the practically justified choices for the (target) block time 𝑇𝑇B = 10 min and the (maximum) block size 𝑆𝑆𝐵𝐵 = 1 MB, plus a subset where Satoshi Nakamoto had a greater degree of discretion. A key design decision was to implement “halving”, i.e., a binary right-shift operation, rather than a floating-point factor for the reduction of the coinbase transaction every interval lasting 𝑇𝑇H ≈ 4 years; nevertheless, the initial value 𝐶𝐶0 = 50 BTC = 50 × 108 Sat was not chosen as an integer power of 2, i.e., 𝐶𝐶ℎ = 𝐶𝐶0 × 2−ℎ , leading to rounding errors, and even a slight shortfall of the total BTC supply (1) often quoted as 𝑀𝑀tot = 21 × 106 BTC. Assuming the halving operation for periodic adjustment of the coinbase transaction as given, an alternative annual cycle, i.e., 𝑇𝑇H′ = 1 year containing 𝑁𝑁H′ = 𝑁𝑁H/4 blocks, the total BTC supply 𝑀𝑀tot (1) could have been preserved by scaling the initial coinbase transaction by the same factor, i.e., 𝐶𝐶0′ =4 × 𝐶𝐶0. Yet, if the last non-vanishing coinbase transaction was to be kept around the year 2142, the annual halving would imply to a tremendous increase of the required initial coinbase transaction 𝐶𝐶0 to a huge number outside the storage space reserved for typical integer variables.

Long-Term Dilemma The often-quoted finite BTC supply 𝑀𝑀tot (1) faces a major sustainability issue. A basic principle for network security of the distributed ledger requires that mining remains profitable, while attackers need to be economically disincentivized. In Bitcoin terms, this implies that a certain hash rate needs to be maintained, which corresponds to investment in equipment and energy. Since resulting bills can be assumed to be paid in fiat (money) [448], the reward for mining a block needs to have a certain minimum value in traditional currency. At the time of writing in 2022, the lion share of the reward originates from the coinbase transaction 𝐶𝐶𝑛𝑛 = 𝐶𝐶0 × 2−𝑛𝑛, which amounts to 6.25 BTC for 𝑛𝑛 = 3. In an order of magnitude calculation, this equals to about 100,000 USD, and, for simplicity, we assume 2,000 transactions per block. This back-of-the-envelope calculation essentially suggests that, currently, a cost per transaction of about 50 USD. As long as this amount is mainly covered by the coinbase reward, the actual transaction fees paid by the user remain much lower. However, this necessitates that the ratio of demand-to-supply for BTC

on exchanges stays sufficiently high; a dropping USD-BTC pair also lowers the hash rate, and thus network security. Let’s consider two examples while neglecting inflation, which will most likely affect the BTC price and mining expenses in a similar manner. For 𝑛𝑛 ≥ 6, i.e., by the early 2030s, the coinbase transaction 𝐶𝐶ℎ will have fallen below 1 BTC. So, by then, one BTC must be traded at approximately 100,000 USD to keep transaction costs fairly constant. After 10 halving cycles, i.e., at 𝑛𝑛 = 10 in the middle of the 21st century, less than 0.05 BTC will be newly issued per block, meaning that one BTC would have to sell at about 2 million USD at exchanges in order to restrict transaction fees to present levels. Therefore, and in addition to the limited transaction throughput, Bitcoin can only meet the economic requirements of a micropayment system if the number of transactions that can be crammed into a single block is substantially increased, e.g., by layer-2 solutions such as the Lightening [435] or Liquid [436-438]. As layer 1 with the current block size of 𝑆𝑆B ≤ 1 MB and clock rate 𝑇𝑇B ≈ 10 min, Bitcoin will, otherwise, inevitably become “Digital Gold” where high transaction fees (and comparatively low throughputs 𝑊𝑊T) are acceptable in the market.

Take-Home Messages The detailed scrutiny of Bitcoin’s design parameters underpins the following hypothesis: The target values for the block time 𝑇𝑇B = 10 min and the maximum block size 𝑆𝑆B = 1 MB are prescribed by real-world boundary conditions of a deliberately decentralized peer-to-peer payment system relying on a distributed public ledger file. The evidence in this section suggests that Satoshi Nakamoto then needed to choose a proper finite total supply 𝑀𝑀tot of his new cryptocurrency, and a commonly accepted mechanism to deal out 𝑀𝑀tot for incentivizing widescale participation in Proof-of-Work [449] mining for securing Bitcoin. A fixed total supply 𝑀𝑀tot could only be achieved by continuous slashing of the initial coinbase transaction 𝐶𝐶0, for which Satoshi Nakamoto initially picked a catchy amount of the order of 100 BTC; he also opted for the (generic) binary operation of halving. Satoshi Nakamoto then played around with the numbers and found that only a (𝑇𝑇H = 4 = 22)-year interval would sufficiently spread out to a “fairer” distribution of Bitcoin over several generations well into the next century. Satoshi Nakamoto calculated from the ratio of 𝑇𝑇H and 𝑇𝑇B that a 4-year period corresponds to roughly 210,000 blocks, which would have resulted in a total supply 𝑀𝑀tot of 42 million BTC. It is theorized that Satoshi Nakamoto then compared this 𝑀𝑀tot to the M1 money supply in 2008 of 21 × 1012 USD, and discovered that halving the value of his originally planned initial coinbase transaction to 𝐶𝐶0 = 50 BTC produces 𝑀𝑀tot = 21 × 106 BTC; additionally, the issuance date of the last BTC around the year 2142, which is linked a final mint of about 1 Sat, remains untouched. By equating 1 BTC = 108 Sat, numerical parity between the M1 money supply and 𝑀𝑀tot is achieved in their indivisible subunits Cents and Sats (tokens), respectively. In a similar way as shown in the preceding section, Satoshi Nakamoto probably experimented with a few alternative parameter sets, but was content to have found a sweet spot in the parameter space where the binary system for alluding to his new, computer-based digital currency, quantitatively “matches” the legacy monetary system. As we will see in the following, and to the possible delight of Satoshi Nakamoto, the resulting, rather “weird” numbers 21 and 42 nicely lent themselves to further analogies; these figures convey messages reflecting historical and societal happenings as well as a portion of “nerdy” fun relevant to both, the creator and the creation of Bitcoin.

Bitcoin Dates Release of Whitepaper The day Satoshi Nakamoto chose for the release the Bitcoin whitepaper in 2008 was 31 October [450], i.e., Halloween [451]. This may indicate awareness of this ancient tradition, or superstition. Yet,

depending on the time zone, the publication date is sometimes falls on 01 November [452] (a Christian holiday [453]), which is only composed of the binary numbers 0 and 1 – the number set of digital math. Besides, 01/11/2008 [452] was a Saturday, which resonated with “Satoshi”, but might also hint towards a work schedule peaking towards the weekend.

Initial Blocks 0 & 1 It might also be argued whether the date of the genesis block 0 [144, 145], Saturday, 03 January 2009 (at 06:15 pm GMT) [398] was chosen because of the matching, very likely inspirational headline [146] in “The Times” [147]. It has also been raised that the inclusion of the title might have served as a proof that no mining took place prior to the official release. Timestamping by inclusion of a reference to a newspaper is actually familiar from the early days of blockchain [359]. On this very day in January 2009 [398], also Sir Alan Arthur Walters [454], a prominent British economist, passed away. He was best known as the Chief Economic Adviser to the Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher [455], and fought for Britain to maintain strict monetary targets, and that the money supply should not be manipulated for political reasons. These attitudes of strict fiscal policies might have appealed to Satoshi Nakamoto. However, given that his Alan Walter’s activities in his political role date as far back as the 1980s, it is less likely that this gentleman was on Satoshi Nakamoto’s mind. Upon seeing these events, Satoshi Nakamoto might have expedited issuing the Genesis block, but then chose to take more time to mine block 1 [150] only after a 6-day gap on 09/01/2009 (at 2:54 am GMT) [456]. The historical events on this day do not seem to have particular significance to Bitcoin, except that its cross sum 0 + 9 + 0 + 1 + 2 + 0 + 0 + 9 yields 21. Other experts believed that the mining hiatus may have simply been caused by the instability of the frequently crashing Bitcoin v0.1 release.

Digits & Numeral Systems – Vires in Numeris By constructing a new persona, Satoshi Nakamoto had a broad range of options in fabricating his pseudonym, age, and nationality. It could be observed that such (widely) self-definable biodata and dates of Bitcoin, while protecting his privacy, most likely contain messages that fit very well with the psychogram of a genius, the historic and current events at the time, and his socio-economic attitudes. It is also quite striking that the “odd” number 21 repeatedly occurs in the rather free design parameters within the setup of Bitcoin, often without conclusive technical reasoning. It can be hypothesized that these digits, as well as further peculiarities excavated in the following, may convey one, or potentially more, messages conceived by the elusive mastermind of Bitcoin. This section identifies and delivers potential interpretations of such “suspicious” numbers to eventually extract some information about Satoshi Nakamoto’s attitudes and sense of humor around Bitcoin. Note that, to the best of the author’s knowledge, Satoshi Nakamoto did not suggest looking for any hidden stories, they might all be essential artefacts of the mysterious puzzle he left for the world to unravel.

Why 21? What strikes most Bitcoin enthusiasts is the choice of the often almost religiously deemed total supply 𝑀𝑀tot of 21 million BTC. Following the previous considerations (1), this BTC limit could have been freely selected, e.g., by adjusting the original coinbase transaction 𝐶𝐶0 accordingly; in fact, most would have either expected a quantity in the decimal system, such as ten, a hundred, or a multiple of 1,000 to have convenient names like million, billion, trillion [441], or in the binary system , i.e., a power of 2, or even a byte-based amount, that can be expressed in the commonly used units kB, MB, GB or TB, in the quasi-decimal, octal domain.

We have already seen that 21 also pops up in other contexts, like the 21 × 104 blocks per halving interval 𝑁𝑁H ≈ 𝑇𝑇H 𝑇𝑇B⁄ , the first two digits of the year when the final coinbase transaction will be issued, and the cross sum of the block 1’s (somewhat freely set) date of mining. Further occurrences and potential meanings of 21 (and 42) will be unveiled in the next sections. As almost any clue derived in this article, each of them might, per se, be fully coincidental, unintended, and even outrageously overinterpreted. Moreover, it is also very likely that the author has blatantly overlooked other correlations further supporting or dismissing decisive ingredients of the subsequent story . But for now, let us take it a step further before making a final judgement.

Binary Operators If we play around with the numbers, all revolves about the binary “alphabet” 0,1,2, the number 21, which may also be regarded as compounding the digits 2 and 1, and Satoshi Nakamoto’s indirectly, by repeatedly stated intention to navigate the binary space by left- and right shifting operators, i.e., multiplication by 2 and halving, to produce the numbers 4 = 2 × 2 = 22 and 42 = 2 × 21 within the base-2 “grammar”.

Patterns Regularly alternating binary patterns when converting from these decimal numbers:

• 1 = 20: I • 2 = 21: I0 • 21 = 24 + 22 + 20: I0I0I • 42 = 2 × 21 = (25 + 23 + 21): I0I0I0

These oscillating sequences might be symbolizing blocks (“I” ↦ ■) and their links (“0” ↦ ○), i.e., inclusion of the previous block hash in the new block, which may be a numeral depiction of a

blockchain ■○■○■○■○■○■.

Decimals There is also some sprinkle of the decimal system in the block time and the subunits of BTC in the setup, specifically in Satoshi Nakamoto’s choice of subdividing 1 BTC into 108 tokens, i.e., atomic subunits of “Satoshis”, or merely “Sats”. Here, a typical value linked to signed or unsigned integer variable would lead to ranges between −2,147,483,648 = −231 to +2,147,483,647 = 231 − 1 ≈2.1 × 109 = 21 × 108, and 0 to +4,294,967,295 = 232 − 1 ≈ 4.2 × 109 = 42 × 108 in common 32-bit systems, respectively. What strikes most is that the 21 resurfaces again if expressed in units of 108, which is the same order of magnitude between BTC and Sats. As previously elaborated, it also surprises that the initial mining reward 𝐶𝐶0 was set to 50 BTC; which was initially intended to be 100 BTC [424]. Given its halving cycle, the ”logical” choice for 𝐶𝐶0 would have been 2ℎ (Sat), or expressed as something like “I000…0000” (with a long “chain” of “0s”) in the binary system, so that the last (finite) coinbase transaction would have been exactly 1 Sat.

Other Numeral and Binary-to-Text Systems The author could not find any evidence of further messages, e.g., be expressing Satoshi Nakamoto in other encoding systems, e.g., hexadecimal [457], or any piece yielding Bitcoin addresses in its base-58 encoding [458]. Also ASCII code [459] or Roman numerals [460] did not yield any compelling outcomes.

Bitcoin Keys and Addresses Maybe one can juggle with some elements, like the pseudonym Nakamoto, and applying Bitcoin’s Elliptic Curve Cryptography [461] (“ECC”, specifically the secp256k standard) for generating public

keys, and then hashing by SHA256 followed by RIPEMD160 algorithms may disclose some further cues, e.g., when expressed in the common alphanumeric base-58 system [458]. In an email to early adopter Hal Finney dated Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 8:41 AM [142, 143, 462], Satoshi Nakamoto observed that the Bitcoin address ‘1NSwywA5Dvuyw89sfs3oLPvLiDNGf48cPD’ [463], which he had (fortuitously) generated (but which received its first BTC transaction only on 31/08/2014) contained his initials (in the reverse Japanese order NS, i.e., last name followed by given name), and elaborated on how users could intentionally produce such vanity Bitcoin addresses containing words or names through computational brute force efforts. Note that the (Japanese ordered) initials N.S. would evidently fit well to a cryptocurrency pioneer [48] who conceived Bit Gold [127] in the 2000s, arguably deemed the technologically closest precursor to Bitcoin. While this reclusive person is quite concordantly acknowledged by the expert community as one of the few candidates to have had the know-how to develop Bitcoin in 2008, he adamantly denies being Satoshi Nakamoto.

Alphabet Numbers can be associated with letters according to their ordering in the alphabet, and possibly also with other meanings in a mathematical context. A few connections may be construed, e.g., 0 ↦ 0: Neutral element of addition, 1 ↦ A: Algebra, Neutral element of multiplication, 2 ↦ B: Bitcoin, Blockchain, Binary, Bay Area, Berkeley, 4 ↦ D: Decentralization, Distributed Ledge Technology (DLT), 21 ↦ U: UK, USA. However, the author would rank these correlations to Satoshi Nakamoto and Bitcoin as rather weak.

Geometrical Symbolism Dice Counting the spots on the six faces of a dice 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 yields 21. Moreover, a common dice is arranged so that each pair of opposite sides adds up to 7, so offering the alternative calculation 3 × 7 = 21. These geometrical associations, which a math genius recognizes quasi instantaneously, allude to “rolling the dice”, which is a common theme in the mathematical discipline of probability (calculus); this syntax may point to the topic of the 1957-textbook citation [299] in the Bitcoin whitepaper [118], and further reference the popular table game of Craps [464] in the world of gambling. Geometrically, the dice is shaped like a cube or block, which then evokes the notion of blockchain in the context of Bitcoin. Consequently, there exists a rather astonishing analogy between the number 21, statistics, the distributed ledger technology (DLT) blockchain, and the casino mentality that is often affiliated with the (investment) banking system that was presumably scorned by Satoshi Nakamoto considering the message he embedded into the genesis block [144].

Magic Cube Even more, if we “left-shift” 21 in the binary space, we arrive at the number 42 = 2 × 21, which was Satoshi Nakamoto’s original pick for the first coinbase transaction 𝐶𝐶0′ = 42 BTC. This number, at least for a math-driven mind, associates with a (simple) “magic cube” [465, 466]; all its lines parallel to the faces, and all four triagonals, sum up to 𝑚𝑚 ⋅ (𝑚𝑚3 + 1) 2⁄ ; for the case 𝑚𝑚 = 3, the formula results in 42. Geometrically, a cube can evidently be interpreted (again) as a block. As stated in a personal email [424], Satoshi Nakamoto originally considered setting a finite supply 𝑀𝑀tot (1) of 42 million BTC, but this “seemed high”, so he halved it. Note that, as already stated above, this context also highlights a contradiction, or another variation of the interpretation, to a secondary source [424], stating that the 21 million BTC limit 𝑀𝑀tot (1) was pegged to the M1 global money supply measured in USD [425].

Blockchain By investigating Bitcoin parameters like the total supply of 21 million BTC, i.e., 𝑀𝑀tot = 21 × 1014 Sat, we observe that they contain a long chain of 0s; in contrast, common computer based measurements are usually expressed in the octal (Byte = by eight or 8 bit) system; for instance, 1 MB = 1020 Byte =1,048,576 Byte, which is only close to 1 (decimal) million (=mega) Byte, but not ending with a longer sequence of 0s.

Hence, by interpreting 21 (and 42) as standing for “block” denoted by the symbol ■, and the many zeros as a chain-link (technically speaking, the inclusion of the previous block hash into the next block)

by ○, we may, again, “depict” the number 21 × 1014 representing the basic supply of smallest

subunits of Bitcoin as a block ■ chain ○○○○○…○○. Media, Sports & Games 21 21 (Film) On 28 March 2008, i.e., presumably during a decisive phase for Satoshi Nakamoto in creating Bitcoin, the Columbia Pictures heist drama film “21” was released [467]. This movie, as well as others [468], are based on the book “Bringing Down the House: The Inside Story of Six MIT Students Who Took Vegas for Millions” [469]. Allegedly spiced with some dramatic exaggerations, this Hollywood production describes the story the MIT Blackjack Team [374] that was believed to be founded around 1980. In the context of Satoshi Nakamoto and Bitcoin, the following bits might be of interest: MIT [470], Harvard [471], Las Vegas, financial (tuition) problems, scholarships, casinos, gambling, banking games, and Blackjack [367], where the number 21 is of central importance. The movie also features the so-called “Monty Hall Problem” [472], which is a brain teaser, in the form of a probability puzzle, loosely based on the American television game show “Let's Make a Deal” [473], and named after its original host [474]. The underlying mathematical problem was originally posed (and solved) in a 1975 letter [475], and an article [476] submitted to the American Statistician [477]. Born in 1941, the author [478] is a professor emeritus of biostatistics at the University of California, Berkeley [309] in the San Francisco Bay Area [310], which is known as the birthplace and hotspot of the cypherpunk [218, 219] movement in the early 1990s. Note that these articles have been published in 1975 [254], i.e., the same year Satoshi Nakamoto claims to have been born on his P2P Foundation profile [240]. In the aftermath of its box office success, a racial “whitewashing” controversy emerged over the decision to star the majority of the characters by white Caucasian Americans, even though the main players in the book template were Asian-Americans; its only actor from this minority had one-note designations as the squad's kleptomaniac and a slot-playing loser. Moreover, intra-Asian conflicts arose as one (former) Chinese-American member of the MIT Blackjack team uttered "I would have been a lot more insulted if they had chosen someone who was Japanese or Korean, just to have an Asian playing me." A Beautiful Mind (Film) As it most likely attracted a very similar audience, it is also noteworthy to look the Universal / Dreamworks movie “A Beautiful Mind that started screening (in US cinemas) on 21/12/2001 (note the exclusive composition of the date by the numbers 0,1,2,21, and 2001 ↦ 2001↦ 21?) [479]. It is a Hollywood adapted biopic of John Nash [67] (1928–2015), an American mathematician who made fundamental contributions to game theory [480], which evidently plays a major role in Bitcoin. John Nash’s work shed light onto the factors that govern chance and decision-making inside complex systems found in everyday life.

In 1994, Nash was co-awarded the Nobel (Memorial) Prize in Economic Sciences [481] "for their pioneering analysis of equilibria in the theory of non-cooperative games" [482], and the prestigious Abel Prize [483] in 2015. In 1959, Nash began showing clear signs of mental illness, and spent several years at psychiatric hospitals being treated for schizophrenia [377]. After 1970, his condition slowly improved, allowing him to return to academic work by the mid-1980s. The case of John Nash may exhibit some (partial) overlap with Satoshi Nakamoto, e.g., around the buzz words genius [360], game theory [480], encryption (ECC [461]), mental disorder [375], MIT [470], and Princeton [324]. Music Album “Twenty One” [418] is the second studio album by the English indie rock band Mystery Jets [419]. It was released in the UK on 24 March 2008; it is explain [484]: “Twenty One is the perfect name for this album on more than one level. Identities are still being shaped during the first half of most people’s 20s.” Protecting his “identity” evidently also paramount for the staging the “mystery” of Satoshi Nakamoto. Note that the “21” [485] by the British artist Adele [486] was world's best-selling album of the year for both 2011 and 2012, but obviously released post Bitcoin whitepaper [118]. The title refers to her (approximate) age at the time of composing and recording, so most likely no connection to Bitcoin’s choices for 21. 42 Due to the role of the binary operators that occurred already in the context of Bitcoin parameters for doubling and halving, we explore “left-shifting”, i.e., doubling 21, to obtain 42 = 2 × 21. There are a couple of intriguing correlations between Bitcoin and this number. It can be found in his emails with an early adopter [424] that the number 21 emerged from halving Satoshi Nakamoto’s initial pitch of 42 million total supply 𝑀𝑀tot (1) of BTC. The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy At least in “nerdy” academic and techie circles around mathematicians, physicists, or computer scientists, 42 is known as the “Answer to the Ultimate Question of Life, The Universe, and Everything” [487]; this absurdly simple number to a complex philosophical question is calculated after 7.5 million years by the humanoid supercomputer “Deep Thought” [488] in “The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy” [489]; this science-fiction comedy franchise was created by Douglas Adams [490], who died in 2001 (↦ 2001↦ 21?). Originally a 1978 radio broadcast on BBC Radio 4, it was later adapted to other formats, including stage shows, novels, comic books, a 1981 TV series, a 1984 text-based computer game, and a 2005 feature film [489]. Level 42 The “Answer to the Ultimate Question of Life, The Universe, and Everything” [487-489] also inspired the name of the English jazz-funk band “Level 42” [491]. Formed on the Isle of Wight [492] in 1979, the band disbanded in 1994, and reformed in 2001; they had a number of UK and worldwide hits during the 1980s and 1990s. One of Level 42’s legendary songs is “Running in the Family” [493] from their homonymous 1987-album [494]. This circumstance (weakly) implies that Bitcoin might have been developed by a multigeneration group of “relatives” (in blood or mind); such a peculiar multi-author constellation would explain some conundrums regarding locations, time zones, spelling, typesetting, competences and historical embedding. Furthermore, strong family bonds offer enhanced cohesion for robust and sustained collusion compared to a team of fairly independent players which are merely forged by complementary competences and joined interests.

Coldplay Song "42" [495] is a song by the British rock band Coldplay [496] (released on 12 June 2008); it is called "42" after the favorite amongst some of its composers [497]. Its lyrics go:

Those who are dead are not dead They are just living in my head And since I fell for that spell I am living there as well, oh Time is so short And I'm sure There must be something more

Computer Science School As a direct reference to this science-fiction franchise, the private, non-profit and tuition-free computer science school “42” was opened in 2013 [498]. It was created and funded by a French billionaire [499] with several businesses in the telecommunications and technology industry. This unconventional name was an explicit reference to “The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy” [489]. 42 Laws of Cricket The beginnings of the of the sport of cricket [500] date back to the beginning in the late 16th century in south-east England. Its rules are specified in a code called “The Laws of Cricket” which has a global remit [501]. There are 42 Laws (always written with a capital "L"). The version of the code has been owned and maintained by its custodian, the London-based Marylebone Cricket Club (MCC) since 1788. While it has significantly moved on by now as an open international sport including female competitions, cricket still strongly roots in a deep tradition of a “Gentlemen” sport, with an air of upper class and elite education in its home country England. Cricket is predominantly popular in the United Kingdom, Australia, South Africa, New Zealand, Ireland, India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, West Indies, Bangladesh, Namibia, and Zimbabwe. These countries are all affiliated with the former British Empire and the Commonwealth, where English, with a preference for British spelling, is either the native language, or acts as a lingua franca. Texas 42 There is also a trick-taking domino game known as Texas 42 [502]. It is played with a standard set of double six dominoes. 42 is often referred to as the "national game of Texas", where it was designated the official “State Domino Game”.

Jackie Robinson The number 42 is tightly affiliated with the legendary baseball player Jackie Robinson (1919 – 1972) [503], the first black athlete to play in Major League Baseball (MLB) during the modern era. Robinson played for the Brooklyn [504]. Since 1977, his famous jersey number 42 has been retired by his alma mater UCLA, and by all MLB teams since 1977; commencing in 2004, each MLB player wears No. 42 on "Jackie Robinson Day” [505], which is celebrated on April 15. Robinson’s outstanding role for sports and society is underpinned by the 2013 (i.e., after the 2008-release of the Bitcoin whitepaper [118]) American biographical film “42” [506]. His story may give cues to racial discrimination, for instance, felt by Satoshi Nakamoto as member of a (possibly Japanese-American) minority, and to locations like New York (Brooklyn) and Los Angeles (UCLA [507], Dodgers, who were, much controversially, moved to Los Angeles in 1957 [504, 508]), the metropolitan area where a cypherpunk and strong “Satoshi Nakamoto candidate” [47, 170, 171] (and a Japanese-

American person accidentally sharing the name with Satoshi Nakamoto [170, 171]) resided at the time of the release of Bitcoin.

Science Trivia Geography The possible meaning of the numbers 21 and 42 might also be scrutinized from a geographical perspective. Yet, neither the 21st nor 42nd meridians east and west provided any locations that related to Bitcoin, nor did their corresponding latitudes on the Southern hemisphere. In the North, the 21st latitude [509] crosses Hawaii, and the 42nd parallel [510] Massachusetts (Boston), Connecticut, New York, and Illinois (Chicago) – nothing super compelling overall, with the potential exception of Massachusetts hosting MIT [470] and Harvard [471], as related to the film “21” [467], and the University of Illinois Chicago [96, 511]. At the 42nd parallel, the rotational speed of the earth approximately matches the speed of sound.

Biology As one of the 23 pairs of chromosomes in humans [512], chromosome 21 is both the smallest human autosome and chromosome. Most people have two copies, while those with three copies of chromosome 21 have Down syndrome [513], also called "trisomy 21". Chromosome 21 is associated with diseases, disorders and conditions, such as cancers, intellectual disability, or early onset familial Alzheimer's disease. A likely connection of chromosome 21 to Satoshi Nakamoto could not be obtained.

Sorting Circumstantial Evidence Numbers and Numeral Systems 21 The most striking pointers gather around the number 21, which occurs in the rather free Bitcoin design parameters: the total BTC supply capped to 𝑀𝑀tot = 21 × 106 BTC = 21 × 1014 Sat (1) each halving period 𝑇𝑇H ≈ 4 years corresponding to 𝐻𝐻B = 21 × 104 blocks. Reportedly [165], this quantity, as expressed in the smallest BTC unit (token) of Sats, may have been derived from the 2008 global M1 money supply, as expressed in USD cents. On top of the rather weakly, copious other contexts indicate that the choice of 21 may have had additional, non-exclusive interpretations that may have been encoded by Satoshi Nakamoto. 21 also equals the cross sums of the “free digits” in his self-issued date of birth (05/04/75). i.e., 5 + 4 + 7 +5 = 21, and the timestamp of block 1 (09/01/2009 ↦ 9 + 1 + 2 + 9 = 21) [150] after his self-set mining gap to the genesis block [144, 145]. As a reference to “block” – possibly the most frequent, non-trivial word in the Bitcoin whitepaper [118], 21 also corresponds to the sum over the faces of a dice, which is the geometrical equivalent of a cube or block. When expressing the supply limit 𝑀𝑀tot (1) of 21 × 106 BTC = 2100000000000000 Sat in the decimal space, the series of 0s certainly resembles a chain, thus potentially depicting a blockchain. Bitcoin was also launched in the 21st century, when his potential chess idol Bobby Fischer [244], who conceived the famous “21-move brilliancy” [373], passed away (in January 2008). In March of 2008, the film “21” was released, names after the central relevance of this number in the casino banking game Blackjack.

0,1,2,4 The decimal number 21 yields an alternating “I0I0I” in the binary space, which might be deemed as the elements (0) and links (I) constituting a (block-)chain. The 21 is also composed of the digits 2 and 1 of the base-2 system, which has the neutral element 0, and right- and left-shifting bits implementing

division by 2 (i.e., × 2−1) and doubling (i.e., × 2); these binary operators directly occur in the halving period for the value of the initial mining reward, and 4 = 2 × 2 as the approximate period 𝑇𝑇H. Somewhat surprising, the initial mining reward of 𝐶𝐶0 = 50 BTC was not chosen as a power of 2, but, in the same way as the total supply 𝑀𝑀tot (1) and the (target) block time 𝑇𝑇B = 10 min, in a quantity complying best with the decimal system. This also holds for 𝐻𝐻B = 210,000 = 21 × 104 blocks. Evidently 𝐻𝐻B × 𝑇𝑇B ≈ 4 years, which then leads to a last coinbase transaction 𝐶𝐶ℎ = 𝐶𝐶0 × 2−ℎ awarded in a year starting with 21, theoretically around 2142. The octal system which is common to express digital storage size utilized by Satoshi Nakamoto to express the (maximum) block size of 1 MB for the Bitcoin blockchain.

42 Doubling, or binary (left-shifting) of 21, yields the number 42 = 21 × 2, again corresponding the to a regularly alternating binary “chain” pattern “I0I0I0”. The number 42 also defines a (simple) magic cube [465], which evokes the symbolism of blockchain. Satoshi Nakamoto mentioned that 42 million BTC was his initial consideration for its total supply 𝑀𝑀tot (1), so this notorious number was definitely on his agenda. A (simplified) calculation arrives at the year 2142 when the final Bitcoin token will be minted. Even more, the 42 constitites the “Answer to the Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything” [487] as calculated and checked by the supercomputer “Deep Thought” [488] according to the “The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy” [514], an entertaining sci-fi comedy that is very popular amongst techies. Even the name of the British band “Level 42” [491] and a French computer science school [498] was inspired by this multi-layered figure. The 42 is also a sacred number in the historic Laws of Cricket [501], and the domino game Texas 42 [502, 506]. Moreover, 42 is associated with the jersey number of the famous baseballer Jackie Robinson [503, 506], who broke the race boundaries in professional sport; the number 42 is retired to all Major League Baseball franchises, and all players wear the number 42 once per season on “Jackie Robinson day” [505]. The Northern latitude of 42 [503] cuts through the state of the New England state of Massachusetts (latitude) [510], which occurs in the 2008-movie featuring the MIT Blackjack [374] team and Harvard University [471]. While the occurrence of the number 42 is less prominent than 21 in the final version of the Bitcoin implementation, the sheer fact that a supply of 42 million was Satoshi Nakamoto’s initial choice for the total supply BTC highlights that this number was well on Satoshi Nakamoto’s radar. Therefore, the numerous associations brought forward in this work on 42 ought to be considered for drafting his mindset.

Pseudonym The choice of his pseudonym and the nationality in his (mock) birth certificate clearly articulate Satoshi Nakamoto’s anchoring to Japan. While this provenance is, most likely, a decoy, his particular choice of a rather common Japanese name without reference to a celebrity (discarding “Tominaga Nakamoto” [70, 175, 176]), hints that Satoshi Nakamoto wanted to convey a message. He might have been inspired by his connection to the Sakura House [343, 344], a popular residence for foreigners in Tokyo, the nearby Nakano district [346] and Nakano-sakaue station [345], and the “Nakano Sakaue gang” [92]. The choice his first name [173] is often translated as “intelligent history”, possibly indicating a stint, e.g., as employee or contractor, in a national intelligence agency, or a corporate enterprise in the context of cryptography and cybersecurity. The syllables Naka- [190] and -moto [191] are widespread in Japanese last names. The entirety of his pseudonym might be creatively interpreted as “a genius focused on a project”, or “the wise one of Chinese currency” in Chinese. The initials, in their Japanese

ordering NS, were even highlighted by Satoshi Nakamoto in an email to and one of the earliest Bitcoin adopters [143, 462, 463].

Calendar Satoshi Nakamoto could evidently not rewrite history, so we should also consider the wider context of the constituents of his self-fabricated date of birth.

Birth on 05 April 1975 The departure of Bobby Fischer and from the match for the World-Chess title [244] and the foundation of Microsoft [248] preceded his birthday. The very year 1975 [254] saw the outskirts the Watergate scandal [255], which featured the abuse of government agencies the FBI [200], the CIA [196], and the IRS [515] as political weapons. Also in 1975, the so-called Monty-Hall problem [472] was solved biostatistician Steve Selvin [516] from the University of California, Berkeley [309]. On 05 April 1933, private ownership of gold was declared illegal in the USA [268, 269]. Finally, the number 195↔7 results from swapping the last two digits on the publication date of the final citation [299] in the Bitcoin whitepaper [118].

Bitcoin Whitepaper on 31 October 2008 The year 2008 say a train of happenings building towards the release of the Bitcoin whitepaper [118]. In January, Satoshi Nakamoto’s potential chess hero Bobby Fischer [244], who was famous for his “21-move brilliancy” [373], passed away, the movie “21” [467] and the Mystery-Jets [517] album “Twenty-One” [484, 518] were released in March, and the song “42” [495, 497] by Coldplay [496] in June. The global financial crisis [394, 519] had its first doomsday with the collapse of one of the largest US investment banks [397] on September 15 that year, i.e., just a few weeks prior to the release of the Bitcoin whitepaper [118].

Saturday There is also a markedly high frequency of Saturdays in the events that Satoshi Nakamoto had some room to maneuver with. These are his date of birth on Saturday, 05/04/1975 [242], and the Genesis block 0 [145] mined on Saturday, 03/01/2009 [398]. In Japanese time zone, also the release of the seminal Bitcoin whitepaper was dated on Saturday, 01/11/2008 [452]. Note that in GMT / UTC or US time zones, the announcement of Bitcoin v0.1 [148] was on Thursday, 08/01/2009 [520], and the mining of block 1 on 09/01/2009, or the publication of the Bitcoin whitepaper on 31/10,2008 fell on Fridays. So, in general, a build-up of outcomes can be observed towards the end of the work week.

Locations Pinning Satoshi Nakamoto to a fixed location has so far proven to be extremely difficult. While his self-defined pseudonym and birth certificate point to Japan, few other evidence advocates Japanese nationality. Instead, a chain of evidence [92, 343-346, 521, 522], mainly gained from the similarity of his name to places in Tokyo, and the registration of the privacy-focused email domains [282-286] Satoshi Nakamoto selected as part of his well-orchestrated effort to conceal his identity and whereabouts, indicate that he might have had a spell in Tokyo, and an attraction to the culture, in advance of creating Bitcoin. However, time zone analysis of his postings after the release of the Bitcoin whitepaper reveals some stays across various zones in the continental USA, which is supported by the role places like California with the greater Los Angeles [311, 507, 508] and the Bay Area [310] / Silicon Valley, the state of Massachusetts with the Boston area [470, 471], and Great Britain / The Commonwealth , which is further supported by Satoshi Nakamoto’s (occasional) spelling preference, and the citation of the London-based “The Times” [147] newspaper in Bitcoin’s 2009-genesis block [144, 146]. The second citation [294] of the Bitcoin whitepaper [118], and the association of the postings of X with Dutch IP addresses indicate some liaison with the Benelux countries.

Sport & Games The various contexts disclosed some relevance of strategic games that are known to appeal to mathematically highly gifted “brainiacs”, like Blackjack [367, 368], the Monty-Hall problem [472-474], or chess [244, 373]. In addition, connections to ball sports Baseball [503] and Cricket [500, 501] are shown up, which enjoy particular (but not exclusive) popularity in North America, and in the former colonies of the British Empire, respectively.

Ethnicity The evidence collected so far also points at minority issues, such as the whitewashing of Asian-Americans in the cast of the 2008-movie “21” [467], and the racial discrimination as epitomized by the case of the African-American baseball legend Jackie Robinson [503, 506] and his iconic jersey number 42 [505].

Exposure to Intelligence Organizations As a high-caliber cryptography expert, Satoshi Nakamoto was certainly also well aware of legal issues around cryptography, like the perpetually smoldering conflict between freedom-of-speech [399] for citizens on the one side, and crime-prevention and national security interests on the other. Professionals in this highly demanding field are eagerly coveted by departments in federal three-letter agencies [196-209], as well as the corporate sector. It is also not uncommon that cryptographers in academia are approached by intelligence institutions. Satoshi Nakamoto’s unique mixture of interdisciplinary skills might root from a designated training in such organizations, who would have committed him to long-term confidentiality on information, and to refrain from utilizing intelligence techniques acquired through them in external projects. Cases like the WikiLeaks [159, 409-412, 523] disclosures, Silk Road [93, 414] and SEC [184, 405, 524] challenges to the legitimacy of issuing cryptocurrencies before, during his brief online life, and even after his unexpected exit from the Bitcoin scene might have distinctly sharpened his very pronounced sensitivity for public exposure of himself, and his masterpiece Bitcoin.

Biographical Cues Competences and Motivation Without doubt, Satoshi Nakamoto, especially if assuming an individual actor, must cover an extraordinarily broad spectrum of techno-scientific and economical competences. His amazing C++ programming skills are supplemented by a deeper understanding of distributed computing, mathematics, game theory, the monetary system, banking, and law. Satoshi Nakamoto’s unusually wide spectrum of relevant knowledge was paired with his outstanding ingenuity, creativity, resolve and dedication, probably rooting in a very pronounced libertarian streak in his ideology. Such staunch determination may have grown out of a substantial immersion in the cypherpunk movement, and an irreconcilable personal aversion towards the legacy banking system; this characteristic would be untypical for a person much younger than – say – the age of 25-30, and would thus never have been personally exposed, and significantly delusioned by real-world professional environments and financial matters. Satoshi Nakamoto’s work on Bitcoin may well have commenced around August 2007 with the forerunners of the upcoming financial crisis [393], which has motivated him to crack, for the first time in history, the “double-spending” problem, and thereby achieving the much sought-after goal of “ultrasound digital money”. The tremendous intellectual and creative effort of creating Bitcoin certainly involved unstinted commitment to long daily working hours without (project-related) technical or social communication on the project to avoid compromising the shroud over his identity; managing such a rather extreme social and psychological situation might imply a genius with some (possibly mild) level of mental

condition. Such an extravagant, exceptionally talented individual must definitely have left highly visible marks along his private life, as well as his educational and professional career.

Education & Career With all this, Satoshi Nakamoto must still have had money to pay his everyday bills. Given his widely assumed, pronounced despise for the banking establishment, it is unlikely that he was coming from a wealthy background in 2007/2008 that let him live from inherited assets and passive income. While there are examples of geniuses living a purposely austere lifestyle, e.g., by still living at advanced age and deliberately jobless with their parents [389], such extreme modesty seems to clash with Satoshi Nakamoto’s evident interest in monetary systems. The previously used analysis of the work hours (on Bitcoin) and time zones when he submitted postings and committed to the code repository in 2009/2010 [326, 330] indicates some interstate travel in the USA or Canada, and some stints in Britain / Europe, the latter is also corroborated by the preferred date format DD/MM/YYYY, and his (sporadic) British spelling. Overall, it is likely that Satoshi Nakamoto was intercontinentally commuting between the US and Europe. His Bitcoin-related activity pattern peaked in February, followed by a valley until resuming again towards the summer, resuming around June. Such monthly schedules would suggest an alignment with typical college schedules, for instance, as a student, postdoc, or as a member of academic staff; an experience in scientific publication is further backed by his use of (old-style) double-spacing after the period. However, other facts, like the unusual brevity and composition of references in his Bitcoin whitepaper, or his first name meaning “intelligent history”, direct towards a designated training and job experience in a three-letter secret service agency, which must have strictly obliged him towards high levels of long-term secrecy on classified information and methods acquired. This assumption was shared by insiders that advised this work. A personal connection to the 2008-film “21” taking place within East-coast elite-college environments (MIT, Harvard) also fits well into this framework. The “Saturday” / end -of-the-week frequency revealed in this work might not specifically underpin his academic embedding, as it is rather common in many professional environments, like external consultants who often work from their homebase on Fridays.

Genius This document revealed compounding evidence that, in addition to practical or logical explanations, Satoshi Nakamoto has encoded a mixture of information and pun into a set of “free” variables, like select Bitcoin parameters, certain dates, and his alias. It is important to note that these messages do not (directly) interfere with his resolve for obfuscating his identity and whereabouts; instead, these witty riddles reflect the signature of a genius who cannot resist putting his mind to work to produce jokes that, at least instantaneously, only resonate with similarly endowed superbrains. In a more creative interpretation, these messages tell about a genius who, while being capable of doing amazing things, also has a normal life, with plenty of personal frustrations, and possibly even suffering from social isolation, minority discrimination, and a (mild) form of mental disorder, which has been reported for many other famous inventors and scientists.

Biography and Psychogram – An Attempt After a deep dive the substantial amount of existing research, and a set of new circumstantial evidence exposed in this work, it becomes clear that Satoshi Nakamoto used his unquestionable ingenuity, multidisciplinary competences, and unstinted resolve to pull off Bitcoin and, likewise, to systematically obscure his identity and whereabouts since 2008, i.e., for far more than a decade by now. The author

agrees with its vast majority that the Bitcoin community that we should be very grateful to Satoshi Nakamoto for his priceless gift of developing the first practically functional and globally inclusive cryptocurrency based on a decentralized, public, and distributed ledger to the world. Yet, from a history of science and technology perspective, as well as to anticipate and gauge possible fallout for the future of Bitcoin, it is worthwhile elucidating the story, character, motivation, and mentality of its enigmatic inventor. Satoshi Nakamoto’s pivotal masterwork was formed under the impact of the happenings in history prior to, and at the time of launching the whitepaper in 2008. Just only a few years after its birth, Bitcoin has swiftly turned into a seminal disruptor of the 21st-century technology, and has laid the foundation for adding a native value layer to the present Web2.0. Satoshi Nakamoto’s emerging bio sketch is just to be regarded as a best attempt, as it is largely anchored in an ever-evolving collection of circumstantial evidence and its resulting, often unavoidably subjective and possibly overinterpreted conclusions. Still, here is how the available pieces of the unavoidably incomplete puzzle might optimally assemble. Interestingly, the real Satoshi Nakamoto, when put on the spot, would most likely adamantly deny any interest or involvement in cryptocurrencies, possibly refusing any comments, declining interviews, and presumably even considering legal action if his civil identity was revealed in the context of Bitcoin. He would probably even be happy if other nominations and self-claims were fielded, thus distracting investigators and defocussing the public.

General Profile The author would consider Satoshi Nakamoto a male individual who was raised, or has spent formative years, in a British cultural background. He resided, and / or regularly travelled to and within the United States, to Europe, and had some fondness of (elements of) the Japanese culture. The ingenious architect of Bitcoin most likely belongs to the (extended) Generation X age group, so he might have been around 30 ± 5 years old in the later 2000s. Satoshi Nakamoto must have had excellent formal or autodidactic, fast-tracked and award-decorated education in a rather rare portfolio of disciplines, plus a creative mind for thinking outside the box, and an unsettled resolve for implementation. This all perfectly converged for pulling off Bitcoin in 2007/2008. His interest in “sound money” may well have been accompanied or sparked by events around the turn of the millennium, such as the start of the Eurozone [525] in 1999, or the burst of the dot-com bubble [526] in the early 2000s, when Satoshi Nakamoto discovered cryptocurrencies as a means to implement his libertarian ideals; since then, he might have (possibly anonymously, or via another alias) followed, posted and interacted with the cypherpunk or cryptographer scenes. Satoshi Nakamoto may have had some disappointing experiences, such as bullying by peers or teachers as a prodigy child, for instance, as a (Commonwealth) expatriate, or pertaining to an ethnic minority, e.g., as a Japanese American. Possibly treated as a maverick geek, Satoshi Nakamoto might have been ridiculed by envious fellow students who were sent by their wealthy family to elite colleges, and showed off with prestigious cars and high-fly lifestyle, while he was socially somewhat isolated, and just getting along on a rather tight scholarship budget. Satoshi might have found consolation in computer and internet technologies, strategy (banking or board) games like Blackjack, Poker or Chess, following idols with similar mental and social issues accompanying their genius, like the extravagant world chess champion Bobby Fischer, or the game theorist John Nash, whom he could intellectually and emotionally emphasize with. His exuberant motivation for working extended periods with immense time and emotional commitment on a cryptocurrency must have been rooted from a deep frustration, e.g., with the traditional banking system, paired with a distinct libertarian attitude, as prevalent throughout the

cypherpunk movement. However, possibly due to his age, he might only have discovered and become thoroughly familiarized with this rather niche scene and predecessor cryptocurrencies at the time when he began pondering and working on Bitcoin in the second half of the 2000s. Around the year 2006, Satoshi Nakamoto may have had a longer stay in the Tokyo where he enjoyed the local culture and socialized with a similar-minded community; these circles may have been comprised of Japanophiles, digital nomads, free-speech advocates, and highly privacy-oriented internet natives, which helped him to systematically cover his identity from an early stage, and, in parallel, to decisively enhance his interest in the economically quite radical objectives promoted by the cypherpunk scene. Under the impact of these circumstances, Satoshi Nakamoto gradually developed an increasing, eventually quasi-obsessive passion for cryptocurrencies, which offered a path to address severe issues he affiliated with the, from his angle, dysfunctional banking system by leveraging his outstanding intellectual capabilities and exceptional work morale. Though the interplay of these experiences and capabilities, he decided to devote himself to the Bitcoin project in the second part of 2007, when first signs of the upcoming financial crisis already materialized. Considering his accelerated education, a dedicated training in cryptography or cybersecurity, e.g., in the corporate arena or a three-letter agency, Satoshi Nakamoto entered his self-chosen loneliness within a 1.5-year Bitcoin development tunnel, possibly as an intensive, after-work, late-night pastime. During this decisive period, Satoshi Nakamoto was getting even more motivated by the continuing, concurrently escalating financial crisis; his concerns about free speech that he was familiar with from the preceding or emerging cases, such as Bernstein v. USA, Napster, Megaupload, or Wikileaks, were even amplified. Satoshi Nakamoto might have been emotionally affected by the death of Bobby Fischer, and inspired by the movie 21 elaborating on “breaking the bank” in the first quarter of 2008, and the related 2001-title “A Beautiful Mind”, which were both featuring priority issues of his own life. With a fondness for pattern recognition, he has also enjoyed multifold overlap of his Bitcoin parameters with fun and coincidental interpretations of the number 21 in relation to math, geometry, history, politics, media and sports, and the decentralized “chain of blocks” he invented for Bitcoin. Similarly entertaining correlations also hold for the number 42, like the “The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy”, the “Magic Cube”, the Laws of Cricket, and Jackie Robinson in Baseball. Around August 2008, Satoshi Nakamoto had most of the Bitcoin package wrapped up; however, not having been a seasoned member of the cypherpunk and academic research community, he was somewhat unsure whether he properly accounted for prior art, which was very hard to pinpoint and retrieve with the traditional instruments of used in scientific publishing; in fact, he eventually left out some major work and included some rather “odd” citations to the references of the Bitcoin whitepaper, to an extent that his document would have likely been returned for major revision after peer review by a classical journal; in hindsight, Satoshi Nakamoto might even have been flabbergasted that he (independently) reinvented major elements of Bitcoin’s precursors that displayed technical or motivational overlap. Satoshi Nakamoto seemed to be strong to endure the initial silence, and the mixed, mostly critical and dismissive echo in the cryptographer mailing list to the publication of the whitepaper on 31 October 2008. After the discussion picked up, he initiated a designated Bitcoin mailing list in December 2008. While finalizing his work on Bitcoin v0.1 with the help of a few early adopters (like Hal Finney and Ray Dillinger), Satoshi Nakamoto came across the now legendary “The Times” headline; this unique opportunity to express his motivation and dislike of the legacy monetary system prompted him to

expedite the mining of the Genesis block 0 on 03 January 2009, even though he still wanted to perform some polishing before uploading the code to a public repository almost a week later. Over the next about two years, Satoshi Nakamoto interacted at fluctuating intensity with the continuously growing Bitcoin community. He seemed to have been quite appreciative of contributions, but also showed traits of a benevolent dictator, and notable peaks of his postings and commitment to the code over the course of the years. Overall, Satoshi Nakamoto focused mostly on technical issues, and remained overwhelmingly silent on ideological aspects of Bitcoin occasionally raised by the community. While nowadays many hardcore Bitcoiners tend to perceive him akin to a divine entity, the level of respect towards Satoshi Nakamoto in these early days in the online fora was occasionally appallingly low, and his natural authority even occasionally challenged. Over the course of time, he began transferring the stewardship of Bitcoin development and mailing lists to trusted stakeholders. Satoshi Nakamoto never met, at least not under his pseudonym, in any form, neither by voice, video nor face-to-face, or in person, with other members of the Bitcoin community, a practice that is quite common in online interest groups. Towards the end of 2010, Satoshi Nakamoto might have gotten increasingly alienated from the budding early-adopter community, discouraged about the attitude they showed towards him, disillusioned about the feasibility of his initial objectives; furthermore, Satoshi Nakamoto might have considered his creative part in setting up Bitcoin delivered, faced issues balancing his personal commitments between Bitcoin and his private life and job, which was needed to pay his bills, or look after his newly founded family. Moreover, Satoshi Nakamoto might have gone on to new challenges that his exceptionally gifted mind could play with and solve. Satoshi Nakamoto’s gradual exit from Bitcoin towards April 2011 was also spurred by the arrival of Bitcoin in mainstream media, and in particular through discussions about Bitcoin adoption in circumventing the financial blockade of Wikileaks, and an upcoming meeting with the CIA. He definitely wanted to strictly maintain his own privacy and keep the nascent Bitcoin project out of the limelight and scrutiny by the press and federal agencies. This hyper-cautious attitude might have resulted from professional commitments on strict, and long-term confidentiality he signed with three-letter agencies or industry; their potential breach might lead to seriously sanctions, even reaching as far as longer-term imprisonment; Satoshi Nakamoto was certainly aware of related cases, e.g., from peers, colleagues, or in public media outlets. After his pseudonym became inactive in cyberspace, he did still not want to jeopardize his brainchild and felt a profound ethical obligation to desist pushing certain buttons. Satoshi Nakamoto believed it was unfair to move the BTC he rather easily and copiously mined in 2009, as a lion share of them would be attributed to him. Also, the fear of legal prosecution, e.g., by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), due unauthorized issuance of Bitcoin as a security, might have led to a firm pledge to refrain from touching, or even to burn about 1 million BTC, e.g., by locking up the private keys. (In principle, the private keys might have also been deleted or lost by mistake, but this is unlikely for a computer-versed cryptographer.) A physical destruction of all evidence connecting him to Bitcoin might also have been part of Satoshi Nakamoto’s advanced strategy to strictly protect his privacy, and to eternally obscure the origins of his cryptocurrency project. Satoshi Nakamoto might still enjoy operating in an unnoticed “God-mode” in the Bitcoin community, or even staying involved under his real name, or another mock identity. After all, Satoshi Nakamoto just retired his pseudonym, possibly with a self-imposed pledge to only resurface in emergency situations, such as in the resolution of the civil war about Bitcoin XT, or for relieving a name-alike Japanese-American from unwanted public exposure as the (wrong) person behind Bitcoin.

Satoshi Nakamoto might nowadays be very wealthy, profiting from the Bitcoin he mined in a more competitive environment post 2009/2010, and lucrative follow-on businesses. While his focus might have shifted to other exciting, possibly even diametrically different projects, e.g., in cryptography, Satoshi Nakamoto still remains, like any parent, very proud of the breath-taking success of his now adolescent masterpiece Bitcoin. In public, Satoshi Nakamoto would surely exude the aura of a genius, but otherwise be a normal human with his repertoire of strengths, weaknesses, concerns, flaws and vices in his character.

Examples Just to note that this article does not want to dox a particular person (or group) as “Satoshi Nakamoto”, also because the author simply does not know. This section is mainly intended to demonstrate how the rather comprehensive collection of initially unrelated sources compiled in this article can make sense in terms of matching a person in the real world. Satoshi Nakamoto can well be portrayed as a strongly ideals-driven, legally well versed, very privacy-conscious, inter-continentally engaged, highly gifted and productive modern-age cryptographer [527].

Bernstein & Lenstra The polymath Daniel J. Bernstein [96, 97] has very rarely been mentioned in the context of Bitcoin [65, 528, 529]. Bernstein’s (publicly known) core research focus has not been on cryptocurrency [2], but he might have suddenly been drawn into a rabbit hole when, out of sheer curiosity, he was taking a glance at the state-of-the-art in the mid-2000s. So, while staying active in his main daytime job academia, he created Bitcoin as a transient, “hobbyist”-type excursion to challenge his brilliant intellect. Preferring to stay in incognito mode, he filed under the stage name “Satoshi Nakamoto”. After his exodus, Bernstein successfully “moved on” to advance exciting new ideas revolving about his mainstay interests in cryptography [530]. As a student in University of California, Berkeley [309], and later as a professor at the University of Illinois [511], he wanted to publish a paper and associated source code on his “Snuffle” [531] encryption system. Starting in 1995, and later even representing himself, Bernstein ran a multi-year, multi-stage series of court cases on whether software source code was protected by the “freedom of speech” guaranteed under the First Amendment of the US Constitution [400]; these cases addressed whether that the government's regulations preventing his publication, and thus the export of cryptography from the United States, were unconstitutional [399]. Born in 1971, the extraordinary American-German researcher was already high-ranked at young age in prestigious talent competitions, awarded a M.A. in mathematics from New York University [532] in 1991, and a PhD in 1995 from the University of California, Berkeley [309], i.e., in the Bay Area [310], the birthplace of the cypherpunk [218, 219] movement in the first half of the 1990s. His graduate studies were supervised by Hendrik Lenstra [246], who, principally, worked in computational number theory, and is well known as the discoverer of the elliptic curve factorization method, later at Leiden University [533] in the Netherlands [238], i.e., Benelux [239]. Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) [461] methods are used in Bitcoin, and Lenstra was even briefly suggested as “Satoshi Nakamoto” [25] based on the Dutch IP address as the origin of the previously mentioned, mysterious postings of “X” titled “Virtual peer to peer banking” on the Usenet [230] groups alt.internet.p2p and uk.finance [231]. Could “Satoshi Nakamoto” be embodied by a junior-senior academic dream team? Bernstein is a visiting professor at CASA (“Cyber Security in the Age of Large-Scale Adversaries”) [534] of the Ruhr University Bochum [535], Germany, and a research professor of Computer Science at the University of Illinois Chicago [511], USA. (Note that Chicago is on the 42nd parallel North [510].) Before this, he was a professor in, and still closely collaborates [536-538] with the department of

mathematics and computer science at the Eindhoven University of Technology [539] in the Netherlands [238]. Hence, there is a tangible link to the “odd” second citation [294] from a “networking” meeting in Benelux [239] region (which seemed to have also been presented only days later at Stanford [302, 303]) in the Bitcoin whitepaper [118]. Bernstein’s mid-1990s work [540] is also cited in the sixth reference [129] of the Bitcoin whitepaper [118]. For the last three decades, Bernstein has been giving talks all over the planet [541], including in 2006 on “High-speed cryptographic functions” [522] at Chuo [542], a private flagship research university in Tokyo, Japan. His densely packed travel schedule might also explain his comment on temporary loss of online connectivity [142]. His name also appeared in the context of the above-described Keccak-SHA-3 controversy [417-421]. In its aftermath, an article on “Sakura tree coding” was published [521], acknowledging him, and the NIST [415, 416] hash team, for ”useful discussions”. Note the astonishing relation of his day of birth around the Japanese cherry blossom, the striking name matching with the previously occurring “Sakura House” [343-345] accommodation and its Tokyo neighborhoods [346, 347], and the registration of the privacy web services [92, 282-287] registered to the same facility. Remarkably, Bernstein’s Google Scholar profile [530] displays one 2012-publication [543] in Japanese kanji [544] writing; its senior author is the accomplished Kouichi Sakurai [545], a professor of mathematical informatics at Kyushu University [546] in Fukuoka [547], Japan. Surprisingly, the generation-X [249] cryptologist is not listed as an author, but only cited with his 2009 book entitled “Post Quantum Cryptography” [548, 549]. This may underpin his high academic reputation and possible links to Japan. The author of this article approached both researchers. Daniel Bernstein did not reply upon multiple requests; Hendrik Lenstra stated: “I can categorically and honestly declare that I never had any interest or expertise in cryptocurrencies.”

Craig Wright Upon the release of the preprint of my document, the author was communicating with Dr. Craig Wright [28, 73, 74, 550-556] who is, according to the author’s best knowledge at the time of writing, the only person who (ay least seriously and repeatedly) claims to be the inventor of Bitcoin (in public). Wright’s statement is fiercely contested by an apparently solid majority of the Bitcoin and crypto community [73, 557-564]. However, since his highly publicized, apparently not entirely voluntary coming out in 2015/2016, Wright has underpinned his position in courts, whether as defendant or plaintiff of libel cases against major stakeholders in the crypto industry and journalism. Nowadays, Wright complains that his original idea of Bitcoin has been substantially altered, especially through the SegWit [565] and Taproot [566] updates, to an extent that he became an activist against Bitcoin’s present implementation, while promoting another electronic payment system [431]. From the author’s neutral position, Wright makes a lot of statements about his unique, amazingly broad portfolio of competences, formal qualifications, and diverse entrepreneurial and employment history that, if confirmed, would indeed make him a strong candidate for Satoshi Nakamoto. Yet, for instance, given the psychogram transpiring from the Bitcoin whitepaper, it can be assumed that Satoshi Nakamoto would have certainly anticipated the public expectation of a clear proof of identity, primarily through using the private keys for moving coins residing at Bitcoin addresses that are attributed to him [151, 152]. He could also send a message from email accounts he used during his online life as Satoshi Nakamoto. (However, such evidence would still need to factor in that a hoaxer could have gotten control of such digital fingerprints through alternative means.) Wright stubbornly continues to contend that such evidence was unsuitable for proving the real-world identity of Satoshi Nakamoto, a point which is ferociously contested by major fractions of the community.

Instead, Wright tends to repeatedly produce rather soft evidence, like his exceptionally broad set of Bitcoin-relevant skills, his staggering number of patent filings, and his relevant professional history and private context. Playing devil’s advocate, the very scarce information Satoshi Nakamoto revealed about himself left the world with an open canvas of his biography; it can be contended that essentially anybody from a credible age group who understands the Bitcoin technology platform through the whitepaper and related books, and had studied Satoshi Nakamoto’s public postings, could have wrapped a rather plausible, but fictional story around this skeleton. This makes it also difficult to formally disprove a claim on being Satoshi Nakamoto. In a final attempt, the author just accepted that Wright would, for some reason, have lost possession of the widely demanded, Bitcoin-blockchain based proof of identity. Wright could have then still made his case at least more credible if he was to produce evidence dating prior to August 2008 when he first used his pseudonym, or the release of the whitepaper on 31 October 2008; the author suggested that Wright ought to provide credible documentation, witness, or a detailed description of key “Eureka” moments while conceiving Bitcoin, e.g., when he came up with the unprecedented solution for the notorious double-spending or single-point-of-failure issues through (a clever combination of) concepts like a distributed ledger, proof-of-work (“mining”), and a hash-linked chain of timestamped blocks. Overall, Wright became increasingly fluffy when approaching hard proof, which, he argued, will be produced at some stage in courtrooms by “people”. His exit strategy was that he is actually not interested in confirming his statements on being Satoshi Nakamoto, and rather quickly transformed into an activist against the present form of Bitcoin, while promoting his new, competing system [431], and other project(s). In the interaction with the author of this article, Wright created an unnecessarily emotionalized atmosphere, spiced with many hot-headed swearwords and rather despicable language, and his serial filing of libel and defamation cases including personal intimidation and threats (against the author) are in stark contrast to the characteristics and mindset of Satoshi Nakamoto that the author sensed when reading his Bitcoin whitepaper and 2009/2010 online postings. His multi-day interaction with Wright left the author quite perplexed: In general, tabling a claim for the identity of an(other) individual, as per definition of this very word, can only have a binary outcome: Either Wright is indeed the creator of Bitcoin, meaning the genius who already changed the age of information, or he is an imposter with a confusing strategy and objectives. What is his benefit of filing libel cases if he is not willing to prove his identity according to widely acceptable standards? Why would he impose the stress upon himself of coming out or assuming another identity for the rest of his life, knowing that he will never be able to substantiate his claim to the satisfaction of the community? If he was an imposter, why is he not afraid that the real “Satoshi Nakamoto” would appear – does he know about his fate of never being willing or able to ever appear on stage, or does he even collude with him? In fairness, if Wright is not able or willing to produce more compelling evidence, the overwhelming fraction of the crypto community will most likely remain in serious doubt. Why is the Craig Wright example relevant to cryptocurrency community and industry, in addition to the curiosity-driven search for the origins of Bitcoin? Apart from referring to himself as Satoshi Nakamoto, Wright sues major crypto-stakeholders in court for calling him a fraud [78-83, 567]. Maybe of significantly more practical relevance than the more and more academic debate on his inventorship of Bitcoin after the blockchain community has transitioned into a life of its own, Wright has filed, and been issued, numerous intellectual property rights for potentially important components of blockchain technology [84-86], which might hamper progress or jeopardize current and future blockchain projects.

Summary & Outlook This paper has identified several somewhat free parameters that concern: the design of the Bitcoin blockchain, the content and citations of the Bitcoin whitepaper, the stage name, and the dates set by its creator. Even though Satoshi Nakamoto never seems to have deposited directions to search for puzzles, such intention may actually be inferred from his enigmatic character, and the baffling twists and turns of his online life. Hence, such compounding of cues strongly suggests that at least a subset of them were deliberately enclosed by Satoshi Nakamoto. While each piece of the puzzle and its “exegesis” might justifiably be challenged on an individual level, the striking accumulation of evidence around his pseudonym, the numbers 21 and 42, the binary system, and symbolism match well with a likely personality, as well as locations, dates and happenings that unfolded in politics, the economy, history, geography, culture, society, media, and sports related to Satoshi Nakamoto and Bitcoin; this large stack of diverse circumstantial evidence unveils a very privacy conscious, reclusive, quite omniscient, multi-facetted, creative, and still more factually oriented than ideologically driven tech genius. Dovetailing these discoveries with the slew of preceding research on Satoshi Nakamoto amalgamates to a still hypothetical, but consistent partial biography and psychogram of an intellectually abundantly endowed, altruistic, sensitive and, at least in the eyes of the general public, erratic person that is, by embodying this unique spectrum of traits, unprecedented in the history of science and technology. Even though not pursued in this work, the diversity and inconsistency of certain information might also be attributed to a confined group, e.g., with a shared history in a federal or corporate cryptography department, or even an academic, entrepreneurial or family combo that conspired for the development of Bitcoin, possibly coordinated by a designated of de-facto leader. The assumption of an expert squad might also explain the unusual blend of primarily US-American, British, European and Far-Eastern artefacts attributed to Satoshi Nakamoto. This work refrained from pitching new or supporting existing names, or from infringing with the privacy of the real person(s) that has (so far) successfully perched behind the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto. Unsurprisingly, as the evidence discovered in the fabric of Bitcoin were deployed by himself, Satoshi Nakamoto would have hardly included anything that unwraps his highly refined disguise of identity. His encrypted messages were mostly providing a peek into important happenings, his witty humor, and possibly exposing certain sentiments. However, the compiled evidence might serve to probe the list of past or upcoming nominations, or to debunk self-appointed “Faketoshis”; while the story drafted here will certainly not hold in all its detail, good arguments would have to be offered for deviations, and convincing alternatives would have to be presented in order to support any “Satoshi” hypothesis. For now, the choice to apply the catalogue of characteristics excavated in this article to “Satoshi Nakamoto candidates” is up to the reader. Rather than being driven by selling names, matches to the profile proposed here, with rather moderate and reclusive characters, should be considered, while honoring their preference for privacy. When coming under scrutiny, it is to be anticipated that such individuals would bluntly deny their involvement in the creation of Bitcoin. Moreover, given his highly rational, technical approach, it is unlikely that, if at all, Satoshi Nakamoto would step into the public without being able of producing compelling evidence for convincingly identifying him as the inventor of Bitcoin. After all, final truth finality of Satoshi Nakamoto’s real identity and aliveness might not be achievable, given that his private keys may have been, whether intentionally or forcefully, burned, physically destroyed, shared, or transferred within a cohort of creators, their entourage, or to externals. At the end of the day, the Bitcoin blockchain is only equipped with a native value, but not an identity layer

that next-generation blockchains aspire to integrate. The author believes that the Bitcoin mastermind would nowadays be more than happy to chime in with the motto “We are all Satoshi!”.

Acknowledgements Many thanks to some of the grands of cryptography and blockchain the author got the opportunity to have quite revealing and inspiring communication with. He also enjoyed the help of various the readers of drafts, whether experts of the topic, and those with non-blockchain backgrounds.

References 1. Satoshi Nakamoto. Accessed: 08/12/2021; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satoshi_Nakamoto. 2. Cryptocurrency. Accessed: 16/06/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cryptocurrency. 3. Blockchain. Accessed: 31/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blockchain. 4. The World's Real-Time Billionaires. Accessed: 18/05/2022; Available on:

https://www.forbes.com/real-time-billionaires/. 5. Bill Gates. Accessed: 18/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Gates. 6. Steve Jobs. Accessed: 21/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Jobs. 7. Elon Musk. Accessed: 05/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elon_Musk. 8. Mark Zuckerberg. Accessed: 18/05/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Zuckerberg. 9. Jeff Bezos. Accessed: 18/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeff_Bezos. 10. Jack Dorsey. Accessed: 18/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Dorsey. 11. Web2.0. Accessed: 18/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_2.0. 12. Vitalik Buterin. Accessed: 28/04/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vitalik_Buterin. 13. Ethereum. 2021; Accessed: 09/10/2021; Available on: https://ethereum.org/. 14. Charles Hoskinson. Accessed: 02/05/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Hoskinson. 15. Cardano. Accessed: 03/09/2020; Available on: https://cardano.org/. 16. Gavin Wood. Accessed: 18/05/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gavin_Wood. 17. Polkadot. Accessed: 27/09/2021; Available on: https://polkadot.network/. 18. Sam Bankman-Fried. Accessed: 03/06/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sam_Bankman-Fried. 19. Centre for Effective Altruism. Accessed: 03/06/2022; Available on:

https://www.centreforeffectivealtruism.org/. 20. Alameda Research. Accessed: 03/06/2022; Available on: https://www.alameda-

research.com/. 21. Roger Ver. Accessed: 28/04/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roger_Ver. 22. Changpeng Zhao ("CZ"). Accessed: 03/06/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Changpeng_Zhao. 23. Binance. Accessed: 03/06/2022; Available on: https://www.binance.com/. 24. Frisby, D. The Search for Satoshi. 2014 Published: 8/11/2021; Accessed: 17/05/2022; Available

on: https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2014/11/08/the-search-for-satoshi/.

25. Prisco, G. New Speculations on the Identity of Satoshi Nakamoto. 2014 Published: 30/11/2014; Accessed: 05/05/2022; Available on: https://www.ccn.com/new-speculations-identity-satoshi-nakamoto/.

26. Vigna, P. Bitcoin Creator 'Satoshi Nakamoto' Unmasked–Again? 2014 Published: 16/04/2014; Accessed: 27/04/2022; Available on: https://www.wsj.com/articles/BL-MBB-19688.

27. Collier, K. The misidentification of Satoshi Nakamoto. 2015 Published: 30 June 2015; Available on: https://theweek.com/articles/561540/misidentification-satoshi-nakamoto.

28. Kampmark, B. Searching for Satoshi Nakamoto and Hunting Bitcoin. 2015 Published: 10/12/2015; Accessed: 10/05/2022; Available on: https://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL1512/S00027/searching-for-satoshi-nakamoto-and-hunting-bitcoin.htm.

29. Popper, N. Decoding the Enigma of Satoshi Nakamoto and the Birth of Bitcoin. 2015 Published: 15/05/2015; Available on: https://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/17/business/decoding-the-enigma-of-satoshi-nakamoto-and-the-birth-of-bitcoin.html.

30. O’Hagan, A. The Satoshi Affair. London Review of Books, 2016. 38. 31. Feins, W. Satoshi Nakamoto. 2017. 32. Smith, G. The Many Facts Pointing to Shinichi Mochizuki Being Satoshi. 2019 Published:

04/12/2019; Accessed: 02/05/2022; Available on: https://news.bitcoin.com/the-many-facts-pointing-to-shinichi-being-satoshi.

33. Who is Satoshi Nakamoto? You WON'T Believe This!! 2020 Published: 20/12/2020; Available on: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=udUydSKMcUM.

34. Bitcoin - Unmasking Satoshi Nakamoto. 2020 Published: 11/05/2020; Accessed: 27/04/2020; Available on: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XfcvX0P1b5g.

35. Strongest SATOSHI Candidates Yet?? 2020 Published: 29/12/2020; Accessed: 27/04/2022; Available on: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuItlQZ3RQg.

36. Kenton, W. Satoshi Nakamoto. Investopedia, 2020. 37. Is crypto expert Len Sassaman the creator of Bitcoin, Satoshi Nakamoto? 2021 Published:

06/03/2021; Available on: https://www.cnbctv18.com/market/is-crypto-expert-len-sassaman-the-creator-of-bitcoin-satoshi-nakamoto-8520761.htm.

38. evanhatch.eth. Len Sassaman and Satoshi: a Cypherpunk History - We’ve lost too many hackers to suicide. What if Satoshi was one of them? 2021 Published: 21/02/2021; Accessed: 28/04/2022; Available on: https://evanhatch.medium.com/len-sassaman-and-satoshi-e483c85c2b10.

39. Hoskinson, C. and L. Fridman. Adam Back is Satoshi Nakamoto | Charles Hoskinson and Lex Fridman. 2021 Published: 20/06/2021; Accessed: 02/05/2022; Available on: https://youtu.be/lFw-3wynj-o.

40. Kaplan, M. Who is Satoshi Nakamoto? Two men claimed to be the inventor of Bitcoin. 2021 Published: 20/11/2021; Available on: https://nypost.com/2021/11/20/how-two-men-one-dead-one-alive-came-to-claim-they-invented-bitcoin/.

41. Micali, S. and L. Fridman. Who is Satoshi Nakamoto? | Silvio Micali and Lex Fridman. 2021 Published: 19/03/2021; Accessed: 02/05/2022; Available on: https://youtu.be/5WwHQ2kEjDA.

42. Liu, A. What Satoshi Said: Understanding Bitcoin Through the Lens of Its Enigmatic Creator. 2014; Accessed: 11/07/2022; Available on: https://www.vice.com/en/article/vvbm43/quotes-from-satoshi-understanding-bitcoin-through-the-lens-of-its-enigmatic-creator.

43. Kay, G. The many alleged identities of Bitcoin's mysterious creator, Satoshi Nakamoto. 2021 Published: 28/11/2021; Accessed: 11/07/2022; Available on:

https://www.businessinsider.com/bitcoin-history-cryptocurrency-satoshi-nakamoto-2017-12.

44. Gusson, C. The first days of Bitcoin and Dustin D. Trammell’s emails with Satoshi Nakamoto. 2021 Published: 28/03/2021; Accessed: 11/07/2022; Available on: https://cointelegraph.com/news/the-first-days-of-bitcoin-and-dustin-d-trammell-s-emails-with-satoshi-nakamoto.

45. BlackHatCoiner. Bitcoin Forum > Bitcoin > Bitcoin Discussion > I gathered every Satoshi Nakamoto thread. 2020 Published: 27/08/2020; Accessed: 13/07/2022; Available on: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5271796.

46. Adam Back. Accessed: 27/04/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Back. 47. Hal Finney (computer scientist). Accessed: 27/04/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hal_Finney_(computer_scientist). 48. Nick Szabo. Accessed: 08/12/2021; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nick_Szabo. 49. David Chaum. Accessed: 27/04/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Chaum. 50. Wei Dai. Accessed: 27/04/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wei_Dai. 51. Gavin Andresen. Accessed: 27/04/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gavin_Andresen. 52. 10 People Who Might Be Satoshi Nakamoto. Published: 31/05/2019; Accessed: 09/05/2022;

Available on: https://news.bitcoin.com/10-people-who-might-be-satoshi-nakamoto/. 53. Ratliff, E. Was Bitcoin Created by This International Drug Dealer? Maybe! 2019 Published:

16/07/2019; Accessed: 09/05/2022; Available on: https://www.wired.com/story/was-bitcoin-created-by-this-international-drug-dealer-maybe/.

54. Len Sassaman. Accessed: 28/04/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Len_Sassaman.

55. Goodman, L.M. The Face Behind Bitcoin. 2014 Published: 03/06/2014; Accessed: 28/04/2022; Available on: https://www.newsweek.com/2014/03/14/face-behind-bitcoin-247957.html.

56. Lowell Frazer. Accessed: 30/04/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lowell_Frazer.

57. Dan Boneh. Accessed: 01/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dan_Boneh. 58. Silvio Micali. Accessed: 01/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silvio_Micali. 59. Emin Gün Sirer. Accessed: 02/05/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emin_G%C3%BCn_Sirer. 60. Penenberg, A.L. The Bitcoin crypto-currency mystery reopened (Archived). 2011 Published:

11/10/2011; Accessed: 09/05/2022; Available on: https://web.archive.org/web/20131006235216/http://www.fastcompany.com/1785445/bitcoin-crypto-currency-mystery-reopened.

61. King, N., V. Oksman, and C. Bry. Updating and Distributing Encryption Keys. 2008 Published: 15/08/2008; Accessed: 09/05/2022; Available on: https://patents.google.com/patent/US20100042841.

62. Shinichi Mochizuki. Accessed: 02/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shinichi_Mochizuki.

63. Simon Singh. Accessed: 16/06/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simon_Singh.

64. The Code Book. Accessed: 16/06/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Code_Book.

65. Howe, D. Does Elon Musk reveal who Bitcoin's mysterious creator Satoshi Nakamoto might be? 2021 Published: 30/12/2021; Accessed: 16/06/2022; Available on:

https://www.quora.com/Does-Elon-Musk-reveal-who-Bitcoins-mysterious-creator-Satoshi-Nakamoto-might-be.

66. Redman, J. The Many Facts Pointing to John Nash Being Satoshi Nakamoto. 2020 Published: 26/10/2020; Accessed: 19/06/2022; Available on: https://news.bitcoin.com/the-many-facts-pointing-to-john-nash-being-satoshi-nakamoto/.

67. John Forbes Nash Jr.; Accessed: 30/04/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Forbes_Nash_Jr.

68. Redman, J. The Many Facts Pointing to Chainlink's Sergey Nazarov Being Satoshi Nakamoto. 2021 Published: 10/02/2021; Accessed: 22/06/2022; Available on: https://news.bitcoin.com/the-many-facts-pointing-to-chainlinks-sergey-nazarov-being-satoshi-nakamoto/.

69. Phil Zimmermann. Accessed: 07/07/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phil_Zimmermann.

70. Craig Steven Wright. Accessed: 27/04/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Craig_Steven_Wright.

71. Mozur, P. and N. Popper. He’s Bitcoin’s Creator, He Says, but Skeptics Pounce on His Claim. 2016 Published: 02/05/2016; Accessed: 06/05/2022; Available on: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/03/business/dealbook/bitcoin-craig-wright-satoshi-nakamoto.html.

72. Warland, J. . 2016 The Unmasking of Bitcoin Creator Craig Wright Was a Long Time Coming2; Available on: Published: 02/05/2016; Accessed: 06/05/202

https://time.com/4313928/bitcoin-craig-steven-wright-satoshi-nakamoto/. 73. Greenberg, A. and G. Branwen. Is Bitcoin's Creator this Unknown Australian Genius? Probably

Not (Updated). 2015 Published: 08/12/2015; Accessed: 27/04/2022; Available on: https://www.wired.com/2015/12/bitcoins-creator-satoshi-nakamoto-is-probably-this-unknown-australian-genius/.

74. Knibbs, K. Here's All the Evidence That Craig Wright Invented Bitcoin. 2015 Published: 09/12/2015; Accessed: 06/05/2022; Available on: https://gizmodo.com/heres-all-the-evidence-that-craig-wright-invented-bitco-1747059371.

75. Creighton, J. Have We Finally Found the Creator of Bitcoin? 2015 Published: 12/08/2015; Accessed: 09/05/2022; Available on: https://futurism.com/have-we-finally-found-the-creator-of-bitcoin.

76. Kharif, O. He Says He Invented Bitcoin and Is Suing Those Who Doubt Him. 2019 Published: 19/06/2019; Accessed: 11/06/2022; Available on: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-06-19/who-invented-bitcoin-a-series-of-court-cases-could-shed-light.

77. Drake, E. Vitalik Buterin fails to respond to legal Letter of Claim and now faces High Court of Justice case for libel against Bitcoin Creator Dr Craig Wright. 2019 Published: 26/04/2019; Accessed: 11/06/2022; Available on: https://coingeek.com/vitalik-buterin-hides-from-legal-proceedings-rather-than-defend-libel-claim-by-bitcoin-creator-dr-craig-wright/.

78. Haig, S. Craig Wright Abandons Libel Suit Against Adam Back, Pays All Legal Fees. 2020 Published: 13/04/2020; Accessed: 04/07/2022; Available on: https://cointelegraph.com/news/craig-wright-abandons-libel-suit-against-adam-back-pays-all-legal-fees.

79. Partz, H. Craig Wright files another libel suit against Roger Ver after 2019 fail. 2020 Published: 31/08/2020; Accessed: 04/07/2022; Available on: https://cointelegraph.com/news/craig-wright-files-another-libel-suit-against-roger-ver-after-2019-fail.

80. Kuhn, D. Judge Rules for Roger Ver in Craig Wright Libel Lawsuit. 2020 Published: 14/09/2021; Accessed: 04/07/2022; Available on:

https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2019/07/31/judge-rules-for-roger-ver-in-craig-wright-libel-lawsuit/.

81. Sopov, V. Craig Wright vs. Peter McCormack Trial Starts Today; Here's What You Should Know. 2022 Published: 23/05/2022; Accessed: 04/07/2022; Available on: https://u.today/craig-wright-vs-peter-mccormack-trial-starts-today-heres-what-you-should-know.

82. Major, J. Vitalik Buterin calls Craig Wright a scammer, dares self-proclaimed Nakamoto to sue him. 2021 Published: 09/06/2021; Accessed: 04/07/2022; Available on: https://finbold.com/vitalik-buterin-calls-craig-wright-a-scammer-dares-self-proclaimed-nakamoto-to-sue-him/.

83. Corfield, G. Bitcoin 'inventor' will face forgery claims over his Satoshi Nakamoto proof, rules High Court. 2022 Published: 06/01/2022; Accessed: 04/07/2022; Available on: https://www.theregister.com/2022/01/06/craig_wright_satoshi_nakamoto_forgery_claims/.

84. Perez, Y.B. Inside Craig Wright’s blockchain patent ‘empire’. 2019 Published: 18/03/2019; Accessed: 04/07/2022; Available on: https://thenextweb.com/news/inside-craig-wrights-blockchain-patent-empire.

85. Patents by Inventor Craig Steven Wright. 2022; Accessed: 04/07/2022; Available on: https://patents.justia.com/inventor/craig-steven-wright.

86. Mapperson, J. Vitalik Buterin Trolls Craig Wright Over Patent Trolling. 2020 Published: 24/04/2020; Accessed: 04/07/2022; Available on: https://cointelegraph.com/news/vitalik-buterin-trolls-craig-wright-over-patent-trolling.

87. Hendrik Lenstra. Accessed: 05/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hendrik_Lenstra.

88. Vili Lehdonvirta. Accessed: 04/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vili_Lehdonvirta.

89. Bram Cohen. Accessed: 09/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bram_Cohen.

90. Davies, J. The Crypto-Currency - Bitcoin and its mysterious inventor. 2011 Published: 03/10/2011; Available on: https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2011/10/10/the-crypto-currency.

91. Dave Kleiman. Accessed: 03/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dave_Kleiman.

92. Walker, H. and R. Wile. What Did This Swiss Software Developer Have To Do With The Launch Of Bitcoin? 2014 Published: 01/04/2014; Accessed: 29/04/2022; Available on: https://www.businessinsider.com/swiss-software-developer-bitcoin-2014-4?r=US&IR=T.

93. Ross Ulbricht. Accessed: 27/04/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ross_Ulbricht.

94. Mark Karpelès. Accessed: 27/04/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Karpel%C3%A8s.

95. Edward Snowden. Accessed: 01/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Snowden.

96. Daniel J. Bernstein. Accessed: 30/04/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_J._Bernstein.

97. Bernstein, D.J. D. J. Bernstein - Personal Webpage. Accessed: 30/04/2022; Available on: https://cr.yp.to/djb.html.

98. Jean-Jacques Quisquater. Accessed: 31/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean-Jacques_Quisquater.

99. Pr. Jean-Jacques Quisquater. Accessed: 31/05/2022; Available on: https://www-crypto.elen.ucl.ac.be/crypto/people/show/2.

100. Quisquater, J.-J. 25 years of blockchain and continuing to improve it for the citizen. 2017 Published: 20/06/2017; Accessed: 31/05/2022; Available on: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KfAJGfZPtn4.

101. I Think I Know Who Satoshi Is. 2013 Published: 18/05/2013; Accessed: 02/05/2022; Available on: https://youtu.be/emDJTGTrEm0.

102. Clear, M. Clarifications on Bitcoin Article (Archived). 2013 Published: 04/04/2013; Accessed: 09/05/2022; Available on: https://web.archive.org/web/20131217120451/http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2011/10/10/111010fa_fact_davis?currentPage=all.

103. Une, M. The Security Evaluation of Time Stamping Schemes: The Present Situation and Studies. IMES Discussion Paper Series 2001-E-18, 2001.

104. Jed McCaleb. Accessed: 13/07/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jed_McCaleb.

105. Chris Larsen. Accessed: 13/07/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_Larsen.

106. David Schwartz. Accessed: 13/07/2022; Available on: https://www.crunchbase.com/person/david-schwartz-19.

107. Castillo, M.d. Ripple’s Trillion-Dollar Man. 2018 Published: 05/09/2018; Accessed: 13/07/2022; Available on: https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaeldelcastillo/2018/09/04/ripples-trillion-dollar-man.

108. Ryan Fugger. Accessed: 13/07/2022; Available on: https://www.crunchbase.com/person/ryan-fugger.

109. Ducrée, J., DLT4RTD – Distributed Ledger Technology for Research & Technology Development, in Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Blockchain and Web3 for Science, Research and Knowledge Creation (#BFSCON). 2019, Blockchain for Science GmbH: Berlin-Kreuzberg (Germany)

110. Ducrée, J. Research - A blockchain of knowledge? Blockchain - Research and Applications, 2020. 1, 100005 DOI: 10.1016/j.bcra.2020.100005.

111. Ducrée, J., M. Etzrodt, S. Bartling, R. Walshe, T. Harrington, N. Wittek, S. Posth, K. Wittek, A. Ionita, W. Prinz, and J. Lawton Unchaining Collective Intelligence for Science, Research and Technology Development by Blockchain-Boosted Community Participation. Frontiers in Blockchain, 2020. 4, 631648 DOI: 10.3389/fbloc.2021.631648.

112. Ducrée, J., M. Etzrodt, B. Gordijn, M. Gravitt, S. Bartling, R. Walshe, and T. Harrington Blockchain for Organising Effective Grass-Roots Actions on a Global Commons: Saving The Planet. Frontiers in Blockchain, 2020. 3, 33 DOI: 10.3389/fbloc.2020.00033.

113. Ducrée, J., M. Gravitt, R. Walshe, S. Bartling, M. Etzrodt, and T. Harrington Open Platform Concept for Blockchain-Enabled Crowdsourcing of Technology Development and Supply Chains. Frontiers in Blockchain, 2020. 3, 386525 DOI: 10.3389/fbloc.2020.586525.

114. Ducrée, J. Digital twins – Enabling oracles for efficient crowdsourcing of research & technology development through blockchain. Scientific Reports, 2021. DOI: 10.20944/preprints202110.0148.v1.

115. Ducrée, J., M. Etzrodt, S. Bartling, R. Walshe, T. Harrington, N. Wittek, S. Posth, K.W.A. Ionita, W. Prinz, D. Kogias, T. Paixão, I. Peterfi, and J. Lawton Unchaining collective intelligence for science, research and technology development by blockchain-boosted community participation. Frontiers in Blockchain, 2021. DOI: 10.3389/fbloc.2021.631648.

116. Yao, Y., M. Kshirsagar, G. Vaidya, J. Ducrée, and C. Ryan Convergence of Blockchain, Autonomous Agents, and Knowledge Graph to Share Electronic Health Records. Frontiers in Blockchain, 2021. 4, DOI: 10.3389/fbloc.2021.661238.

117. Ducrée, J. DeSci - Decentralized Science. 2022.

118. Nakamoto, S. Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System. 2009 Published: 24/05/2009; Accessed: 15/09/2020; Available on: https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf.

119. Banksy. Accessed: 24/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banksy. 120. Circumstantial evidence. Accessed: 15/06/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumstantial_evidence. 121. Wikipedia. Accessed: 02/12/2020; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page. 122. bitcoin.org. Accessed: 08/12/2021; Available on: https://bitcoin.org. 123. Whois. Whois - bitcoin.org. Accessed: 09/05/2022; Available on:

https://www.whois.com/whois/bitcoin.org. 124. Adam Back On Satoshi Emails, Privacy Concerns And Bitcoin’s Early Days. Accessed:

18/05/2022; Available on: https://dpl-surveillance-equipment.com/bitcoin-and-crypto-currency/adam-back-on-satoshi-emails-privacy-concerns-and-bitcoin-s-early-days/.

125. Brunell, N. Adam Back on Bitcoin's History, Satoshi, Blockstream, Solar Mining and More - Live from Miami. Published: 15/04/2022; Accessed: 22/04/2022; Available on: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5txuXhadQUk&t.

126. Dai, W. and S. Nakamoto. Wei Dai/Satoshi Nakamoto 2009 Bitcoin emails. 2014 Published: 14/09/2017; Accessed: 09/05/2022; Available on: https://www.gwern.net/docs/bitcoin/2008-nakamoto.

127. Szabo, N. Bit Gold. 2005 Published: 27/12/2008; Accessed: 08/12/2021; Available on: https://unenumerated.blogspot.com/2005/12/bit-gold.html.

128. Rivest, R.L. and A. Shamir, PayWord and MicroMint: Two simple micropayment schemes. 1997, Springer Berlin Heidelberg. p. 69-87.

129. Back, A. Hashcash - A denial of service counter-measure. 2002; Accessed: 01/02/2022; Available on: http://www.hashcash.org/papers/hashcash.pdf.

130. Dai, W. b-money. 1998; Accessed: 08/12/2021; Available on: http://www.weidai.com/bmoney.txt.

131. Ecash. Accessed: 13/12/2021; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecash. 132. Nakamoto, S. Re: Transactions and Scripts: DUP HASH160 ... EQUALVERIFY CHECKSIG. 2010

Published: 18/06/2010; Accessed: 11/07/2022; Available on: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=195.msg1617#msg1617.

133. Nakamoto, S. Re: Slashdot Submission for 1.0. 2010 Published: 05/07/2010; Accessed: 11/07/2022; Available on: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=234.msg1976#msg1976.

134. Levine, J. Bitcoin P2P e-cash paper. 2008 Published: 03/11/2008; Accessed: 04/05/2022; Available on: https://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/emails/cryptography/threads/1/#014817.

135. ("Bear"), R.D. Bitcoin P2P e-cash paper. 2008 Published: 06/11/2008; Accessed: 04/05/2022; Available on: https://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/emails/cryptography/threads/1/#014822.

136. Williams, N. Bitcoin P2P e-cash paper. 2008 Published: 17/11/2008; Accessed: 04/05/2022; Available on: https://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/emails/cryptography/threads/1/#014864.

137. Kapilkov, M. Previously Unpublished Emails of Satoshi Nakamoto Present a New Puzzle. 2020 Published: 26/11/2020; Accessed: 29/04/2022; Available on: https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2020/11/26/previously-unpublished-emails-of-satoshi-nakamoto-present-a-new-puzzle/.

138. Fin, E. and R. Dillinger. Interview with Ray Dillinger. 2018 Published: 01/10/2018; Accessed: 03/07/2022; Available on: https://www.ofnumbers.com/2018/10/01/interview-with-ray-dillinger/.

139. Martti Malmi ("Sirius"). Accessed: 09/05/2022; Available on: https://mmalmi.medium.com/. 140. Hertig, A. Bitcoin's Second-Ever Developer Is Back (With a Big Vision for Crypto). 2021

Published: 13/09/2021; Accessed: 04/05/2022; Available on: https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2018/07/31/bitcoins-second-ever-developer-is-back-with-a-big-vision-for-crypto/.

141. Popper, N. The shy college student who helped build Bitcoin into a global phenomenon. 2015 Published: 10/06/2015; Accessed: 02/05/2022; Available on: https://www.theverge.com/2015/6/10/8751933/the-shy-college-student-who-helped-build-bitcoin-into-a-global.

142. Nakamoto, S. and H. Finney. Emails from Satoshi Nakamoto to Hal Finney. 2009 Published: 24/01/2009; Accessed: 03/07/2022; Available on: https://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/finneynakamotoemails.pdf.

143. Vigna, P. Hal Finney and Bitcoin's Earliest Days. 2014 Published: 29/08/2014; Accessed: 07/05/2022; Available on: https://www.wsj.com/articles/BL-MBB-26228.

144. Genesis block. 2009; Accessed: 05/05/2022; Available on: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Genesis_block.

145. Block 0. 2009 Published: 03/01/2009; Accessed: 17/05/2022; Available on: https://www.blockchain.com/btc/block/0.

146. Genesis Block Newspaper. Accessed: 03/05/2022; Available on: https://www.thetimes03jan2009.com/.

147. The Times. Accessed: 06/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Times. 148. Nakamoto, S. Bitcoin v0.1 released. 2009 Published: 2009-01-08 19:27:40 UTC; Accessed:

29/04/2022; Available on: https://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/emails/cryptography/16/. 149. Nakamoto, S. Bitcoin v0.1 released. 2009 Published: 08/01/2009; Accessed: 03/07/2022;

Available on: https://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/emails/cryptography/threads/2/. 150. Block 1. 2009 Published: 09/01/2009; Accessed: 17/05/2022; Available on:

https://www.blockchain.com/btc/block/1. 151. 20212. Protection Over Profit: What Early Mining Patterns Suggest About Bitcoin’s Inventor.

Colin Harper Published: 14/09/2021; Accessed: 20/05/2022; Available on: https://www.coindesk.com/tech/2020/08/31/protection-over-profit-what-early-mining-patterns-suggest-about-bitcoins-inventor/.

152. Kapilkov, M. Researcher: Satoshi Nakamoto Apparently Didn’t Mine Bitcoin for First 5 Minutes. 2020 Published: 25/06/2020; Accessed: 20/05/2022; Available on: https://cointelegraph.com/news/researcher-satoshi-nakamoto-apparently-didnt-mine-bitcoin-for-first-5-minutes.

153. Satoshi Emails. Accessed: 29/04/2022; Available on: https://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/emails/.

154. Nakamoto, S. Topic: Added some DoS limits, removed safe mode (0.3.19) 2010 Published: 12/12/2010; Accessed: 11/07/2022; Available on: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2228.msg29479.

155. Redman, J. 'There's More Work to Do' — 11 Years Ago, Satoshi Nakamoto Sent a Final Message to the Bitcoin Community. 2021 Published: 21/12/2021; Accessed: 28/04/2022; Available on: https://news.bitcoin.com/theres-more-work-to-do-11-years-ago-satoshi-nakamoto-sent-a-final-message-to-the-bitcoin-community/.

156. Rizzo, P. 10 Years Ago Today, Bitcoin Creator Satoshi Nakamoto Sent His Final Message. 2021 Published: 26/04/2021; Accessed: 29/04/2022; Available on: https://www.forbes.com/sites/peterizzo/2021/04/26/10-years-ago-today-bitcoin-creator-satoshi-nakamoto-sent-his-final-message/.

157. Williams, M. 11 Years Ago, Satoshi Dropped a Final Message: “There’s More Work to Do”. 2021 Published: 26/12/2021; Accessed: 29/04/2022; Available on: https://cryptopotato.com/11-years-ago-satoshi-dropped-a-final-message-theres-more-work-to-do/.

158. Hearn, M. and S. Nakamoto. Email 5. 2011 Published: 23/04/2011; Accessed: 11/07/2022; Available on: https://pastebin.com/syrmi3ET.

159. WikiLeaks. Accessed: 02/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WikiLeaks. 160. Julian Assange Accessed: 02/05/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julian_Assange. 161. Nakamoto, S. Re: PC World Article on Bitcoin. 2010 Published: 11/12/2010; Accessed:

03/07/2022; Available on: https://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/posts/bitcointalk/542/. 162. Rizzo, P. The last days of Satoshi: What happened when bitcoin’s creator disappeared. 2021

Published: 26/04/2021; Accessed: 29/04/2022; Available on: https://bitcoinmagazine.com/technical/what-happened-when-bitcoin-creator-satoshi-nakamoto-disappeared.

163. Wallace, B. The rise and fall of Bitcoin (archived). 2011 Published: 23/11/2011; Accessed: 31/05/2022; Available on: https://web.archive.org/web/20140326095105/http://www.wired.com/magazine/2011/11/mf_bitcoin/all/.

164. Nakamoto, S. and G. Andresen. Satoshi’s Last Email. 2011; Accessed: 31/05/2022; Available on: https://www.bitcoin.com/satoshi-archive/emails/gavin-andresen/1/#selection-13.1-13.21.

165. Hearn, M. and S. Nakamoto. Questions about BitCoin (Archived). 2009 Published: 12/04/2009; Accessed: 09/05/2022; Available on: https://web.archive.org/web/20220509115845/https://plan99.net/~mike/satoshi-emails/thread1.html.

166. Simonite, T. The Man Who Really Built Bitcoin. 2014 Published: 15/08/2014; Accessed: 19/05/2022; Available on: https://www.technologyreview.com/2014/08/15/12784/the-man-who-really-built-bitcoin/.

167. Dan Kaminsky. Accessed: 03/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dan_Kaminsky.

168. Bitcoin - Creation. Accessed: 06/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bitcoin#Creation.

169. May 22 Bitcoin pizza day. 2010 Published: 22/05/2010; Accessed: 09/05/2022; Available on: https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/ukkckm/may_22_bitcoin_pizza_day/.

170. Nakamoto, S. Reply by Satoshi Nakamoto on March 7, 2014 at 1:17: "I am not Dorian Nakamoto.". 2014; Accessed: 09/05/2022; Available on: http://p2pfoundation.ning.com/forum/topics/bitcoin-open-source?id=2003008%3ATopic%3A9402&page=2#comments.

171. Hill, K. Bitcoin Creator Returns To Internet To Say, 'I Am Not Dorian Nakamoto'. 2014 Published: 06/03/2014; Accessed: 09/05/2022; Available on: https://www.forbes.com/sites/kashmirhill/2014/03/06/bitcoin-creator-returns-to-internet-to-say-i-am-not-dorian-nakamoto/.

172. Harper, C. No, Satoshi Nakamoto didn’t just move his Bitcoin. 2020 Published: 20/05/2020; Accessed: 20/05/2022; Available on: https://decrypt.co/29575/satoshi-nakamoto-didnt-just-move-bitcoin.

173. Satoshi. Accessed: 28/04/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satoshi. 174. Nakamoto. Accessed: 28/04/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nakamoto. 175. Tominaga Nakamoto. Accessed: 23/06/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tominaga_Nakamoto.

176. Shūichi, K. Tominaga Nakamoto, 1715-46. A Tokugawa Iconoclast. Monumenta Nipponica, 1967. 33, 177-193.

177. Berndan and C. Wright. Craig Wright shares timestamped document of "Satoshi Nakamoto". 2019; Accessed: 23/06/2022; Available on: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tel8aUEUe0U.

178. {X}, w. person speaking is Rana Saoud assistant special agent in charge of Homeland Security Investigations. Does the government know who #Satoshi is and did they meet with “them”? 2022 Published: 06/07/2022; Accessed: 13/07/2022; Available on: https://twitter.com/NerdNationUnbox/status/1544771284697063425.

179. Department of Homeland Security. Accessed: 13/07/2022; Available on: https://www.dhs.gov/.

180. United States Department of Homeland Security. Accessed: 13/07/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Department_of_Homeland_Security.

181. Patents by Inventor Arthur Britto. Accessed: 13/07/2022; Available on: https://patents.justia.com/inventor/arthur-britto.

182. The Complete History of Ripple (XRP). Accessed: 13/07/2022; Available on: https://coinloan.io/article/the-complete-history-of-ripple-xrp/.

183. Woodford, I. It’s time to bring an end to the rumours about Ripple’s anonymous co-founder. 2019 Published: 29/04/2019; Accessed: 13/07/2022; Available on: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/time-bring-end-rumours-ripple-135600956.html.

184. Ripple. Accessed: 14/08/2020; Available on: https://ripple.com/. 185. Ripple Labs. Accessed: 13/07/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ripple_Labs. 186. Nakamoto, S. and T. Ripple. Bitcoin is More Than One Man. 2014 Published: 10/03/2014;

Accessed: 13/07/2022; Available on: https://ripple.com/insights/bitcoin-is-more-than-one-man/.

187. Satoshi. Accessed: 31/05/2022; Available on: https://babynames.com/name/satoshi. 188. Satoshi. Accessed: 30/04/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satoshi. 189. Satoshi. Accessed: 24/05/2022; Available on: https://babynames.com/name/satoshi. 190. Backhaus, P. Middle? Inside? Relax, the kanji for naka has this one in the bag. 2019 Published:

12/11/2019; Accessed: 01/05/2022; Available on: https://www.japantimes.co.jp/life/2019/11/12/language/naka-kanji/.

191. Abe, N. Japanese Word of the Day: Moto. 2018 Published: 23/09/2018; Accessed: 10/05/2022; Available on: https://www.thoughtco.com/moto-meaning-and-characters-2028675.

192. Ottoman Empire. Accessed: 16/06/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ottoman_Empire.

193. Turkey. Accessed: 16/06/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkey. 194. Cathy. What Does Satoshi Nakamoto Mean In Japanese? ; Accessed: 24/05/2022; Available

on: https://somsubhra.com/what-does-satoshi-nakamoto-mean-in-japanese/. 195. Branner, D.P. Nakamoto Satoshi, the name of Bitcoin's inventor. 2013 Published: 14/04/2013;

Accessed: 24/05/2022; Available on: https://dpb.bitbucket.io/nakamoto-satoshi-the-name-of-bitcoins-inventor.html.

196. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). Accessed: 06/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_Intelligence_Agency.

197. Defense Intelligence Agency (DSA). Accessed: 18/06/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defense_Intelligence_Agency.

198. National Security Agency (NSA). Accessed: 24/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Security_Agency.

199. United States Intelligence Community. Accessed: 08/06/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Intelligence_Community.

200. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). Accessed: 08/06/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Bureau_of_Investigation.

201. FSB Criminalistics Institute. Accessed: 18/06/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FSB_Criminalistics_Institute.

202. Directorate-General for External Security (DGSE). Accessed: 18/06/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directorate-General_for_External_Security.

203. MI5. Accessed: 06/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MI5. 204. MI6. Accessed: 06/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MI6. 205. Mossad. Accessed: 2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mossad. 206. Ministry of State Security (MSS, China). Accessed: 18/06/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ministry_of_State_Security_(China). 207. Federal Intelligence Service (BND). Accessed: 18/06/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Intelligence_Service. 208. Operation Rubicon (Crypto AG); Accessed: 18/06/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Rubicon_%28Crypto_AG%29. 209. Crypto AG. Accessed: 18/06/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crypto_AG. 210. Enigma machine. Accessed: 18/06/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enigma_machine. 211. Pearson, J. The CIA Is Deep Into Cryptocurrency, Director Reveals. 2021 Published:

12/07/2021; Accessed: 24/05/2022; Available on: https://www.vice.com/en/article/dyp7vw/the-cia-is-deep-into-cryptocurrency-director-reveals.

212. Is There A Bitcoin Connection Between The CIA & Satoshi Nakamoto? 2016; Accessed: 24/05/2022; Available on: https://www.newsbtc.com/news/bitcoin/bitcoin-connection-cia-satoshi-nakamoto/.

213. Samsung. Accessed: 18/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samsung. 214. Toshiba. Accessed: 18/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toshiba. 215. Nakamichi. Accessed: 18/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nakamichi. 216. Khatri, K. Musk posts old meme linking Samsung, Toshiba, Nakamichi & Motorola to Bitcoin

creator. 2022 Published: 09/03/2022; Available on: https://inshorts.com/en/news/musk-posts-old-meme-linking-samsung-toshiba-nakamichi-motorola-to-bitcoin-creator-1646825682336.

217. Bitcoin - Associated Ideologies. Accessed: 06/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bitcoin#Associated_ideologies.

218. Cypherpunk. Accessed: 27/04/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cypherpunk. 219. Hughes, E. A Cypherpunk's Manifesto. 1993 Published: 09/03/1993; Accessed: 27/04/2022;

Available on: https://nakamotoinstitute.org/static/docs/cypherpunk-manifesto.txt. 220. Libertarianism. Accessed: 28/04/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarianism. 221. Austrian School. Accessed: 06/05/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Austrian_School. 222. Nakamoto, S. Re: Bitcoin P2P e-cash paper. 2008 Published: 07/11/2008; Accessed:

11/07/2022; Available on: https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg09971.html.

223. Re: Bitcoin P2P e-cash paper. 2008 Published: 14/11/2008; Accessed: 11/07/2022; Available on: https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg10001.html.

224. Nakamoto, S. Bitcoin open source implementation of P2P currency. 2009 Published: 11/02/2009; Accessed: 03/05/2022; Available on: http://p2pfoundation.ning.com/m/discussion?id=2003008%3ATopic%3A9402.

225. e-Gold (Archived). Accessed: 19/05/2022; Available on: https://web.archive.org/web/20071112041801/http://www.e-gold.com/e-gold.asp?cid=3745163.

226. E-gold. Accessed: 19/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E-gold. 227. Anguilla. Accessed: 11/07/2022. 228. Bourgi, S. Early meeting of e-Gold founders may hold clue to Satoshi Nakamoto’s identity —

Peter Thiel. 2021 Published: 21/10/2021; Accessed: 11/07/2022; Available on: https://cointelegraph.com/news/early-meeting-of-e-gold-founders-may-hold-clue-to-satoshi-nakamoto-s-identity-peter-thiel.

229. Peter Thiel. Accessed: 11/07/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Thiel. 230. Usenet. Accessed: 16/06/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet. 231. X. uk.finance (Google Group). 2002; Accessed: 05/05/2022; Available on:

https://groups.google.com/d/topic/uk.finance/-Ko72tv170I/discussion. 232. u/slapded. Found this gem newsgroups from 2002. Accessed: 05/05/2022; Available on:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2nicip/found_this_gem_newsgroups_from_2002/.

233. trizma. Topic: Could this be Satoshi back in 2002 (Read 5338 times). 2014 Published: 27/11/2014; Accessed: 05/05/2022; Available on: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=875242.0.

234. Nakamoto"?, S. X - 2002-12-09 22:06:03. 2002 Published: 09/12/2002; Accessed: 05/05/2022; Available on: https://en.bitcoinwiki.org/wiki/X#2002-12-09_22:06:03.

235. Nakamoto"?, S. X - 2002-12-10 10:47:56. 2002; Available on: https://en.bitcoinwiki.org/wiki/X#2002-12-10_10:47:56.

236. Nakamoto"?, S. X - 2002-12-10 11:06:11. 2002 Published: 10/12/2002; Accessed: 05/05/2022; Available on: https://en.bitcoinwiki.org/wiki/X#2002-12-10_11:06:11.

237. IP address. Accessed: 17/06/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IP_address. 238. Netherlands. Accessed: 17/06/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netherlands. 239. Benelux. Accessed: 15/06/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benelux. 240. Nakamoto, S. Satoshi Nakamoto's Page. Accessed: 09/05/2022; Available on:

http://p2pfoundation.ning.com/profile/SatoshiNakamoto. 241. Nakamoto, S. Satoshi Nakamoto's Page (archived). 2010 Published: 15/03/2010; Accessed:

28/04/202; Available on: https://web.archive.org/web/20120529203623/http:/p2pfoundation.ning.com/profile/SatoshiNakamoto.

242. What Happened on April 5, 1975. Accessed: 17/05/2022; Available on: https://www.onthisday.com/date/1975/april/5.

243. April 1975. Accessed: 17/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/April_1975. 244. Bobby Fischer. Accessed: 05/05/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bobby_Fischer. 245. Anatoly Karpov. Accessed: 04/07/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anatoly_Karpov. 246. Manila. Accessed: 04/07/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manila. 247. Paul Allen. Accessed: 21/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Allen. 248. Microsoft. Accessed: 21/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft.

249. Generation X. Accessed: 17/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation_X.

250. Andolfatto, D. How old were the inventors of major inventions? 2016 Published: 14/04/2016; Accessed: 20/06/2022; Available on: http://andolfatto.blogspot.com/2016/04/how-old-were-inventors-of-major.html.

251. Tim Berners-Lee. Accessed: 20/06/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tim_Berners-Lee.

252. Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP). Accessed: 20/06/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypertext_Transfer_Protocol.

253. World Wide Web (WWW). Accessed: 20/06/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Wide_Web.

254. 1975. Accessed: 17/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1975. 255. Watergate scandal. Accessed: 01/06/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watergate_scandal. 256. Vietnam War. Accessed: 02/06/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vietnam_War. 257. United States President's Commission on CIA Activities within the United States. Accessed:

13/06/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_President%27s_Commission_on_CIA_Activities_within_the_United_States.

258. Helsinki Accords. Accessed: 13/06/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helsinki_Accords.

259. Fractal. Accessed: 13/06/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractal. 260. Benoit Mandelbrot. Accessed: 13/06/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benoit_Mandelbrot. 261. April 5. Accessed: 08/06/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/April_5. 262. Blaise de Vigenère. Accessed: 11/06/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blaise_de_Vigen%C3%A8re. 263. Kurt Cobain. Accessed: 17/06/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kurt_Cobain. 264. Nirvana (band). Accessed: 17/06/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nirvana_(band). 265. Music in Seattle. Accessed: 17/06/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Music_of_Seattle. 266. Great Depression. Accessed: 17/05/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Depression. 267. Franklin D. Roosevelt. Accessed: 26/05/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franklin_D._Roosevelt. 268. Executive Order 6102. Accessed: 17/05/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_6102. 269. Hochstein, M. 'Satoshi's Birthday': April 5 Is a Day to Be Thankful for Bitcoin. 2021 Published:

05/04/2021; Accessed: 15/06/2022; Available on: https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2021/04/05/satoshis-birthday-april-5-is-a-day-to-be-thankful-for-bitcoin/.

270. Gerald Ford. Accessed: 13/06/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerald_Ford. 271. George, B. How Can Satoshi Nakamoto Have a Birthday? The Significance of April 5. 2022

Published: 05/04/2022; Accessed: 17/05/2022; Available on: https://www.coindesk.com/learn/how-can-satoshi-nakimoto-have-a-birthday-the-significance-of-april-5/.

272. Cherry blossom. Accessed: 16/06/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cherry_blossom?wprov=sfla1.

273. Konohanasakuya-hime. Accessed: 16/06/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Konohanasakuya-hime.

274. Star Trek. Accessed: 17/06/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Trek. 275. Star Trek: First Contact. Accessed: 17/06/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Trek:_First_Contact. 276. National contact day. Accessed: 17/06/2022; Available on:

https://nationaldaycalendar.com/first-contact-day-april-5/. 277. Nakamoto, S. TOR and I2P. 2010; Accessed: 11/06/2022; Available on:

https://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/posts/bitcointalk/threads/14/. 278. Tor (network). Accessed: 18/05/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tor_(network). 279. Repost: Request: Make this anonymous? Published: 22/11/2009; Accessed: 19/05/2022;

Available on: https://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/posts/bitcointalk/threads/4/. 280. I2P. Accessed: 11/06/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I2P. 281. How did Nakamoto untraceably pay for registering bitcoin.org? 2019 Published: 01/08/2019;

Accessed: 09/05/2022; Available on: https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/89532/how-did-nakamoto-untraceably-pay-for-registering-bitcoin-org.

282. u/btcbarron. vistomail.com closed and domain changed owner in 2014. 2015; Accessed: 09/05/2022; Available on: https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3h80mi/vistomailcom_closed_and_domain_changed_owner_in/.

283. Whois - vistomail.com. Accessed: 09/05/2022; Available on: https://www.whois.com/whois/vistomail.com.

284. vistomail.com @ website.informer.com. Accessed: 10/05/2022; Available on: https://website.informer.com/vistomail.com.

285. Whois. Whois - anonymousspeech.com. Accessed: 09/05/2022; Available on: https://www.whois.com/whois/anonymousspeech.com.

286. anonymousspeech.com (Shut-down). 2021; Accessed: 09/05/2022; Available on: https://archive.ph/RRNKx.

287. www.anoymousspeech.com @ website.informer.com. Accessed: 10/05/2022; Available on: https://website.informer.com/anonymousspeech.com.

288. OP_RETURN. Accessed: 19/05/2022; Available on: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/OP_RETURN. 289. Nakamoto, S. Bitcoin P2P e-cash paper. 2008 Published: 31/10/2008; Accessed: 29/04/2022;

Available on: https://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/2008-October/014810.html.

290. Biggs, J. and S. Grey. Who Is The Real Satoshi Nakamoto? One Researcher May Have Found The Answer. 2013 Published: 05/12/2013; Accessed: 11/07/2022; Available on: https://techcrunch.com/2013/12/05/who-is-the-real-satoshi-nakamoto-one-researcher-may-have-found-the-answer.

291. Hajdarbegovic, N. Linguistic Researchers Name Nick Szabo as Author of Bitcoin Whitepaper. 2014 Published: 11/09/2021; Accessed: 11/07/2022; Available on: https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2014/04/16/linguistic-researchers-name-nick-szabo-as-author-of-bitcoin-whitepaper/.

292. Sharma, R. Bit Gold. Published: 24/10/2021; Accessed: 29/05/2022; Available on: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/bit-gold.asp.

293. Szabo, N. Bit Gold. 2005; Accessed: 29/05/2022; Available on: https://nakamotoinstitute.org/bit-gold/.

294. Massias, H., X.S. Avila, and J.-J. Quisquater. Design of a secure timestamping service with minimal trust requirements. in 20th Symposium on Information Theory in the Benelux. 1999. Haasrode, Belgium.

295. Haber, S. and W.S. Stornetta How to time-stamp a digital document. Journal of Cryptology, 1991. 3, 99-111 DOI: 10.1007/BF00196791.

296. Bayer, D., S. Haber, and W.S. Stornetta, Improving the efficiency and reliability of digital time-stamping, in Sequences II - Methods in Communication, Security, and Computer Science, R.C.A. Santis and U. Vaccaro, Editors. 1993, Springer New York, NY: Positano, Italy. p. 329-334 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4613-9323-8_24.

297. Haber, S. and W.S. Stornetta, Secure names for bit-strings, in 4th ACM Conference on Computer & Communications Security. 1997: Zurich, Switzerland. p. 28-35

298. Merkle, R.C. Protocols for public key cryptosystems. 1980 Published: April; Accessed: 01/02/2022; Available on: http://www.merkle.com/papers/Protocols.pdf.

299. Feller, W., An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications. 1957. 300. Chaum, D. Blind signatures for untraceable payments. Advances in Cryptology, 1983. 199-203

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4757-0602-4_18. 301. Barbé, A., E.v.d. Meulen, and P. Vanroose, Proceedings of the 20th symposium in information

theory in the Benelux. 1999, Werkgemeenschap voor Informatie- en Communicatietheorie (WIC), IEEE Benelux Chapter on Information Theory.

302. Massias, H., X.S. Avila, and J.-J. Quisquater. Timestamps: main issues on their use and implementation. in Proceedings. IEEE 8th International Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WET ICE'99). 1999. Stanford, CA, USA: IEEE Comput. Soc.

303. Stanford University. Accessed: 11/06/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford_University.

304. KU Leuven. Accessed: 31/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KU_Leuven. 305. Université catholique de Louvain. Accessed: 31/05/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universit%C3%A9_catholique_de_Louvain. 306. UC Leuven-Limburg. Accessed: 31/05/2022; Available on:

https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/UC_Leuven-Limburg. 307. IMEC. Accessed: 31/05/2022; Available on: https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/IMEC. 308. Len Sassaman - Homepage. Accessed: 31/05/2022; Available on: https://len.sassaman.net/. 309. University of California, Berkeley. Accessed: 05/05/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_California,_Berkeley. 310. San Francisco Bay Area. Accessed: 04/06/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Francisco_Bay_Area. 311. Los Angeles. Accessed: 11/06/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Los_Angeles. 312. What Happened on April 26, 2009. Accessed: 02/06/2022; Available on:

https://www.onthisday.com/date/2009/april/26. 313. April 26. Accessed: 02/06/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/April_26. 314. Back, A. Hashcash. 1997 Published: 05/1997; Accessed: 22/06/2022; Available on:

http://www.cypherspace.org/hashcash/. 315. Merkle tree. Accessed: 09/11/2020; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merkle_tree. 316. Merkle, R.C., Method of providing digital signatures. 1982, The Board of Trustees of the Leland

Stanford Junior University: USA.

317. Merkle, R.C., A Digital Signature Based on a Conventional Encryption Function. 1988, Springer Berlin Heidelberg. p. 369-378.

318. Feller, W., An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications. 2nd ed. 1971: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

319. Year 1957. Accessed: 31/05/2-22; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1957. 320. Sputnik 1. Accessed: 02/06/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sputnik_1. 321. S&P 500. Accessed: 02/06/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S%26P_500. 322. Fortran. Accessed: 02/06/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fortran. 323. William Feller. Accessed: 31/05/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Feller. 324. Princeton University. Accessed: 01/06/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Princeton_University. 325. Robinson, B. What is it like to leave the CIA or other intelligence agencies? 2014; Accessed:

02/06/2022; Available on: https://www.quora.com/What-is-it-like-to-leave-the-CIA-or-other-intelligence-agencies.

326. The Time Zones of Satoshi Nakamoto. Published: 13/02/2018; Accessed: 19/05/2022; Available on: https://medium.com/@insearchofsatoshi/the-time-zones-of-satoshi-nakamoto-aa40f035178f.

327. Southurst, J. Bitcoin Genesis Block Day: 13 years old today, but it’s all the other blocks that count. 2022 Published: 03/01/2022; Accessed: 17/05/2022; Available on: https://coingeek.com/bitcoin-genesis-block-day-13-years-old-but-its-all-the-other-blocks-that-count/.

328. Chancellor of the Exchequer. Accessed: 11/07/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chancellor_of_the_Exchequer.

329. United States Secretary of the Treasury. Accessed: 11/07/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Secretary_of_the_Treasury.

330. Thomas, S. Satoshi's Posting Times. 2011 Published: 17/08/2011; Accessed: 19/05/2022; Available on: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=37743.0.

331. Mt. Gox. Accessed: 27/04/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mt._Gox. 332. McCaleb, J. New Bitcoin Exchange (mtgox.com). Published: 18/07/2010; Accessed:

03/05/2022; Available on: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=444.0. 333. Manga. Accessed: 05/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manga. 334. GMX Mail. Accessed: 04/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GMX_Mail. 335. theymos. [email protected] is compromised. 2014 Published: 08/09/2014; Accessed:

09/05/2022; Available on: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=775174.0. 336. Company: Michael Weber 1-3-3 Sakura House. Accessed: 10/05/2022; Available on:

https://website.informer.com/Michael+Weber+1-3-3+Sakura+House.html. 337. Company: Michael Weber. Accessed: 10/05/2022; Available on:

https://website.informer.com/Michael+Weber.html. 338. Nakamoto, S. Bitcoin v0.1 released. 2009; Accessed: 09/01/2009; Available on:

https://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/2009-January/014994.html. 339. Anonymous Payment (Archived). 2006 Published: 16/10/2006; Accessed: 19/05/2022;

Available on: https://web.archive.org/web/20080624033758/http://www.anonymousspeech.com/anonymous_payment.aspx.

340. bitcoin.org @ website.informer.com. Accessed: 19/05/2022; Available on: https://website.informer.com/bitcoin.org.

341. GoDaddy.com. Accessed: 09/05/2022; Available on: https://www.godaddy.com/.

342. secureanonymoussurfing.com. Accessed: 10/05/2022; Available on: https://website.informer.com/secureanonymoussurfing.com/emails.

343. Sakura House - For Students, Interns, and Workers. Accessed: 10/05/2022; Available on: https://www.sakura-house.com/.

344. Sakura House Lounge / Office in Shinjuku, Tokyo. Accessed: 10/05/2022; Available on: https://www.sakura-house.com/about/lounge.

345. Nakano-sakaue station. Accessed: 10/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nakano-sakaue_Station.

346. Nakano, Tokyo. Accessed: 10/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nakano%2C_Tokyo.

347. Shinjuku. Accessed: 10/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shinjuku. 348. Shinjuku Ni-chōme. Accessed: 19/05/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shinjuku_Ni-ch%C5%8Dme. 349. Kabukichō. Accessed: 19/05/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kabukich%C5%8D. 350. Forever 21 Is Closing Its Doors In Japan—For Good - Savvy Tokyo - Nothing Lasts Forever.

Published: 17/10/2019; Accessed: 10/05/2022; Available on: https://savvytokyo.com/forever-21-is-closing-its-doors-in-japan-for-good/.

351. Forever 21. Accessed: 13/06/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forever_21. 352. Bharathan, V. Blockchain Was Born 20 Years Before Bitcoin. 2020 Published: 01/06/2020;

Accessed: 29/05/2022; Available on: https://www.forbes.com/sites/vipinbharathan/2020/06/01/the-blockchain-was-born-20-years-before-bitcoin/.

353. Masashi Une's Home Page. Published: 09/02/2007; Accessed: 31/05/2022; Available on: https://www.rcis.aist.go.jp/members/une/.

354. C++. Accessed: 19/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C%2B%2B. 355. Distributed computing. Accessed: 04/05/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributed_computing. 356. Peer-to-peer (P2P). Accessed: 28/04/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peer-

to-peer. 357. Decentralization. Accessed: 28/04/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decentralization. 358. Blockchain. Accessed: 28/04/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blockchain. 359. Oberhaus, D. The World’s Oldest Blockchain Has Been Hiding in the New York Times Since 1995

- This really gives a new meaning to the “paper of record.". 2018 Published: 27/08/2018; Accessed: 28/04/2022; Available on: https://www.vice.com/en/article/j5nzx4/what-was-the-first-blockchain.

360. Genius. Accessed: 01/05/2022; Available on: https://alleydog.com/glossary/definition.php?term=Genius.

361. Davis, J. The Crypto-Currency Bitcoin and its mysterious inventor. 2011 Published: 03/11/2011; Accessed: 03/05/2022; Available on: https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2011/10/10/the-crypto-currency.

362. Vincent van Gogh. Accessed: 03/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vincent_van_Gogh.

363. Virginia Woolf. Accessed: 03/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virginia_Woolf.

364. Ernest Hemingway Accessed: 03/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernest_Hemingway.

365. Genius - Psychology. Accessed: 03/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genius#IQ_and_genius.

366. Poker. Accessed: 05/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poker. 367. Blackjack. Accessed: 05/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackjack. 368. Catch 21. Accessed: 30/04/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catch_21. 369. Twenty-One (banking game). Accessed: 07/05/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twenty-One_(banking_game). 370. Backgammon. Accessed: 29/05/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Backgammon. 371. COLONY.io - Organizations, for the Internet. Accessed: 24/07/2020; Available on:

https://colony.io/. 372. Shogi. Accessed: 23/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shogi. 373. Bobby Fischer's 21-move brilliancy (18 December 1963). 1963; Available on:

https://youtu.be/QHydkEARVKE. 374. MIT Blackjack Team. Accessed: 05/05/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIT_Blackjack_Team. 375. Mental disorder. Accessed: 01/06/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mental_disorder. 376. Bipolar disorder. Accessed: 21/05/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bipolar_disorder. 377. Schizophrenia. Accessed: 21/05/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schizophrenia. 378. Asperger syndrome. Accessed: 21/05/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asperger_syndrome. 379. Autism. Accessed: 21/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autism. 380. History’s 30 Most Inspiring People on the Autism Spectrum. Accessed: 21/05/2022; Available

on: https://www.appliedbehavioranalysisprograms.com/historys-30-most-inspiring-people-on-the-autism-spectrum/.

381. Isaac Newton. Accessed: 05/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isaac_Newton#Personality_and_personal_relations.

382. Jeste, D.V., Chronic Late-Onset Schizophrenia-Like Psychosis That Remitted: Revisiting Newtons Psychosis? American Journal of Psychiatry, 2000. 157(3): p. 444-449.

383. Charles Darwin. Accessed: 21/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Darwin.

384. Ludwig Boltzmann. Accessed: 05/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ludwig_Boltzmann#Final_years_and_death.

385. Albert Einstein. 386. Paul Dirac. Accessed: 21/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Dirac. 387. Nikola Tesla. Accessed: 21/05/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikola_Tesla. 388. Richard Feynman. Accessed: 21/05/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Feynman. 389. Grigori Jakowlewitsch Perelman. Accessed: 21/05/2022; Available on:

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grigori_Jakowlewitsch_Perelman. 390. Terry A. Davis. Accessed: 03/05/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terry_A._Davis. 391. John McAfee. Accessed: 04/05/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_McAfee.

392. King, H. Elon Musk opens up on how Asperger's has impacted his life. 2022 Published: 15/04/2022; Accessed: 21/05/2022; Available on: https://www.axios.com/2022/04/15/elon-musk-aspergers-syndrome.

393. Elliott, L. Three myths that sustain the economic crisis. 2012 Published: 05/08/2012; Accessed: 22/05/2022; Available on: https://www.theguardian.com/business/economics-blog/2012/aug/05/economic-crisis-myths-sustain.

394. Financial crisis of 2007–2008. Accessed: 06/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Financial_crisis_of_2007%E2%80%932008.

395. 2008. Accessed: 06/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008. 396. Chapter 11, Title 11, United States Code. Accessed: 15/06/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chapter_11,_Title_11,_United_States_Code. 397. Lehman Brothers. Accessed: 15/06/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lehman_Brothers. 398. What Happened on January 3, 2009. Accessed: 17/05/2022; Available on:

https://www.onthisday.com/date/2009/january/3. 399. Bernstein v. United States. Accessed: 06/05/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernstein_v._United_States. 400. First Amendment to the United States Constitution. Accessed: 16/06/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution. 401. Constitution of the United States. Accessed: 17/06/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitution_of_the_United_States. 402. Napster. Accessed: 28/04/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Napster. 403. Napster - Legal challenges. Accessed: 06/05/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Napster#Legal_challenges. 404. Megaupload. Accessed: 06/05/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megaupload. 405. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Accessed: 10/06/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._Securities_and_Exchange_Commission. 406. ArtI.S8.C5.1 Coinage Power of Congress. Accessed: 10/-6/2022; Available on:

https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artI-S8-C5-1/ALDE_00001066/. 407. Pokharel, S. and T. John. Julian Assange's extradition to US approved by UK government. 2022

Published: 17/06/2022; Accessed: 17/06/2022; Available on: https://edition.cnn.com/2022/06/17/uk/uk-julian-assange-extradition-priti-patel-intl-gbr/.

408. Guantánamo Bay. Accessed: 22/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guant%C3%A1namo_Bay.

409. Wikileaks - Publication (2006-2008). Accessed: 22/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WikiLeaks#2006%E2%80%932008.

410. Iraq War documents leak. Accessed: 15/06/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_War_documents_leak.

411. United States documents leak of the War in Afghanistan. Accessed: 15/06/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_documents_leak_of_the_War_in_Afghanistan.

412. Chelsea Manning. Accessed: 15/06/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chelsea_Manning.

413. The Game of the Century (chess). Accessed: 2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Game_of_the_Century_(chess).

414. Silk Road. Accessed: 27/04/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silk_Road_(marketplace).

415. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Accessed: 15/06/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Institute_of_Standards_and_Technology.

416. NIST hash function competition. Accessed: 15/06/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NIST_hash_function_competition.

417. Keccak (re-direction to SHA-3). Accessed: 15/06/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Keccak&redirect=no.

418. SHA-3. Accessed: 15/06/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SHA-3. 419. SHA-3 - Weakening controversy. Accessed: 15/06/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SHA-3#Weakening_controversy. 420. Morawiecki, P. Malicious Keccak. Cryptology ePrint Archive, 2015. 421. Schneier, B. Will Keccak = SHA-3? 2013 Published: 01/10/2013; Accessed: 15/06/2022;

Available on: https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2013/10/will_keccak_sha-3.html. 422. Bernstein, D.J., T. Chou, C. Chuengsatiansup, A. Hülsing, E. Lambooij, T. Lange, R. Niederhagen,

and C. Van Vredendaal, How to Manipulate Curve Standards: A White Paper for the Black Hat http://bada55.cr.yp.to. 2015, Springer International Publishing. p. 109-139.

423. Citizenfour. Accessed: 17/06/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizenfour. 424. Hearn, M. and S. Nakamoto. Re: More BitCoin questions. 2011 Published: 10/01/2011;

Accessed: 31/05/2022; Available on: https://www.bitcoin.com/satoshi-archive/emails/mike-hearn/11/.

425. Redman, J. Satoshi's 21 Million Mystery: One-Millionth of the Bitcoin Supply Cap Is Now Worth $1 Million. 2021 Published: 07/05/2021; Accessed: 20/05/2022; Available on: https://news.bitcoin.com/satoshis-21-million-mystery-one-millionth-of-the-bitcoin-supply-cap-is-now-worth-1-million/.

426. Jagdish. Why Bitcoin is limited to 21 million. 2021 Published: 12/11/2021; Accessed: 04/06/2022; Available on: https://news.klever.io/p/why-btc-21-million.

427. Hearn, M. and S. Nakamoto. Re: More BitCoin questions. 2010 Published: 29/12/2010; Accessed: 12/06/2022; Available on: https://www.bitcoin.com/satoshi-archive/emails/mike-hearn/9/.

428. Wang, L. Why the bitcoin difficulty is set to 10 minutes per block? 2017 Published: 13/11/2017; Accessed: 06/05/2022; Available on: https://medium.com/@lingyong/why-the-bitcoin-difficulty-is-set-to-10-minutes-per-block-50aaf1d60ae.

429. Bitcoin Block Time historical chart. Accessed: 12/06/2022; Available on: https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/bitcoin-confirmationtime.html#alltime.

430. Nakamoto, S. [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin XT Fork. 2015 Published: 15/08/2022; Accessed: 04/05/2022; Available on: https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-August/010238.html.

431. Bitcoin SV (Satoshi Vision, BSV). Accessed: July 24; Available on: https://bitcoinsv.io/. 432. Script. Accessed: 04/06/2022; Available on: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Script. 433. Bitcoin scalability problem. Accessed: 07/05/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bitcoin_scalability_problem. 434. Bitcoin Transactions historical chart. Accessed: 12/06/2022; Available on:

https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/bitcoin-transactions.html#alltime. 435. Lightning Network - Scalable, Instant Bitcoin/Blockchain Transactions. Accessed: 11/11/2021;

Available on: https://lightning.network/. 436. Blockstream - The Liquid Network. Accessed: 07/05/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blockstream#The_Liquid_Network. 437. Blockstream - Rethinking Trust. Accessed: 07/05/2022; Available on:

https://blockstream.com/.

438. Blockstream. Accessed: 27/04/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blockstream.

439. Nakamoto, S., J.A. Donald, J. Levine, R. Dillinger, H. Finney, and N. Williams. Bitcoin P2P e-cash paper - Postings on Cryptography Mailing List. 2008 Published: 31/10/2008; Accessed: 04//05/2022; Available on: https://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/emails/cryptography/threads/1/.

440. 1/2 + 1/4 + 1/8 + 1/16 + ⋯. Accessed: 04/06/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1%2F2_%2B_1%2F4_%2B_1%2F8_%2B_1%2F16_%2B_%E2%8B%AF?wprov=sfla1.

441. Long and short scale. Accessed: 20/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_and_short_scale.

442. Nakamoto, S. Bitcoin open source implementation of P2P currency. 2009 Published: 18/02/2009; Accessed: 11/07/2022; Available on: http://p2pfoundation.ning.com/forum/topics/bitcoin-open-source.

443. Money supply. Accessed: 20/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Money_supply.

444. Seberino, C. Why 21 Million Bitcoins Was A Great Idea. 2018 Published: 14/11/2018; Accessed: 20/05/2022; Available on: https://medium.com/@cseberino/why-21-million-bitcoins-was-a-great-idea-bd2533af0f63.

445. Floating-point arithmetic. Accessed: 20/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Floating-point_arithmetic.

446. Hayes, A., J.R. Mrown, and M. Kazel. What Happens to Bitcoin After All 21 Million Are Mined? 2022 Published: 05/03/2022; Accessed: 17/05/2022; Available on: https://www.investopedia.com/tech/what-happens-bitcoin-after-21-million-mined/.

447. Proof of Work (PoW). Accessed: 09/11/2020; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_of_work.

448. Fiat Money. Accessed: 09/11/2020; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fiat_money. 449. Proof-of-work (PoW). Accessed: 29/09/2021; Available on:

https://en.bitcoinwiki.org/wiki/Proof-of-work. 450. What Happened on October 31, 2008. Accessed: 17/05/2022; Available on:

https://www.onthisday.com/date/2008/october/31. 451. Halloween. Accessed: 09/06/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halloween. 452. What Happened on November 1, 2008. Accessed: 17/05/2022; Available on:

https://www.onthisday.com/date/2008/november/1. 453. All Saints' Day. Accessed: 09/06/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All_Saints%27_Day. 454. Alan Walters. Accessed: 16/05/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Walters. 455. Margaret Thatcher. Accessed: 09/06/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_Thatcher. 456. What Happened on January 9, 2009. Accessed: 17/05/2022; Available on:

https://www.onthisday.com/date/2009/january/9. 457. Hexadecimal. Accessed: 21/05/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hexadecimal. 458. Binary-to-text encoding. Accessed: 21/05/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary-to-text_encoding. 459. ASCII. Accessed: 21/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASCII.

460. Roman numerals. Accessed: 21/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_numerals.

461. Elliptic-curve cryptography (ECC). Accessed: 28/04/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elliptic-curve_cryptography.

462. Emails between Satoshi Nakamoto and Hal Finney between 10 - 24 January 2009. 2009 Published: 24/01/2022; Accessed: 07/05/2022; Available on: http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/finneynakamotoemails.pdf.

463. Bitcoin Address 1NSwywA5Dvuyw89sfs3oLPvLiDNGf48cPD. Accessed: 08/05/2022; Available on: https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/1NSwywA5Dvuyw89sfs3oLPvLiDNGf48cPD.

464. Craps. 21/05/2022. 465. Magic cube. Accessed: 30/04/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magic_cube. 466. Simple magic cube. Accessed: 21/05/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simple_magic_cube. 467. 21 (film). Accessed: 28//04/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/21_(2008_film). 468. The Last Casino. Accessed: 21/05/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Last_Casino. 469. Bringing Down the House (book). Accessed: 21/05/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bringing_Down_the_House_(book). 470. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Accessed: 05/05/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massachusetts_Institute_of_Technology. 471. Harvard University. Accessed: 05/05/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harvard_University. 472. Monty Hall problem. Accessed: 28/04/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monty_Hall_problem. 473. Let's Make a Deal. Accessed: 05/05/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Let%27s_Make_a_Deal. 474. Monty Hall. Accessed: 05/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monty_Hall. 475. Selvin, S. Letters to the Editor. The American Statistician, 1975. 29, 67-71 DOI:

10.1080/00031305.1975.10479121. 476. Selvin, S. On the Monty Hall problem (letter to the editor). The American Statistician, 1975. 29,

134. 477. The American Statistician. Accessed: 08/06/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_American_Statistician. 478. Steve Selvin. Accessed: 2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Selvin. 479. A Beautiful Mind. 2001 Published: 21/12/2001; Accessed: 30/04/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Beautiful_Mind_(film). 480. Game theory. Accessed: 01/06/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Game_theory. 481. Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences. Accessed: 12/06/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nobel_Memorial_Prize_in_Economic_Sciences. 482. List of Nobel Memorial Prize laureates in Economics. Accessed: 12/06/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Nobel_Memorial_Prize_laureates_in_Economics. 483. Abel Prize. Accessed: 2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abel_Prize. 484. Staff, P. Mystery Jets: Twenty One. 2008 Published: 02/04/2008; Accessed: 14/06/2022;

Available on: https://www.popmatters.com/mystery-jets-twenty-one-2496165497.html. 485. 21 (Adele album). Accessed: 2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/21_(Adele_album). 486. Adele. Accessed: 13/06/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adele.

487. 42, or The Answer to the Ultimate Question of Life, The Universe, and Everything. Accessed: 2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hitchhiker%27s_Guide_to_the_Galaxy#42,_or_The_Answer_to_the_Ultimate_Question_of_Life,_The_Universe,_and_Everything.

488. Deep Thought. Accessed: 05/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_The_Hitchhiker%27s_Guide_to_the_Galaxy_characters#Deep_Thought.

489. The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. Accessed: 30/04/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hitchhiker%27s_Guide_to_the_Galaxy.

490. Douglas Adams. Accessed: 05/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douglas_Adams.

491. Level 42. Accessed: 13/06/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Level_42. 492. Isle of Wight. Accessed: 13/06/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isle_of_Wight. 493. Level 42 - Running in the Family. Accessed: 14/06/2022; Available on:

https://youtu.be/sAPjDwHPZxU. 494. Running in the Family. Accessed: 14/06/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Running_in_the_Family. 495. 42 (song by Coldplay). Accessed: 13/06/2022; Available on: https://youtu.be/Z0xfWCDLoCU. 496. Coldplay. Accessed: 13/06/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coldplay. 497. Montgomery, J. Coldplay give track-by-track tour of viva la vida, explain handclaps, tack pianos

and the number 42. 2008 Published: 06/09/2008; Accessed: 15/06/2022; Available on: http://www.mtv.com/news/1589032/coldplay-give-track-by-track-tour-of-viva-la-vida-explain-handclaps-tack-pianos-and-the-number-42/.

498. 42 (school). Accessed: 06/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/42_(school). 499. Xavier Niel. Accessed: 21/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xavier_Niel. 500. Cricket. Accessed: 07/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cricket. 501. Laws of Cricket. Accessed: 07/05/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laws_of_Cricket. 502. 42 (dominoes). Accessed: 06/05/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/42_(dominoes). 503. Jackie Robinson. Accessed: 28/04/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jackie_Robinson. 504. Brooklyn Dodgers. Accessed: 16/05/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brooklyn_Dodgers. 505. Jackie Robinson Day. Accessed: 21/05/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jackie_Robinson_Day. 506. 42 (film). Accessed: 30/04/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/42_(film). 507. University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA). Accessed: 05/05/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_California,_Los_Angeles. 508. Los Angeles Dodgers. Accessed: 16/05/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Los_Angeles_Dodgers. 509. 21st parallel north. Accessed: 05/05/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/21st_parallel_north. 510. 42nd parallel north. Accessed: 05/05/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/42nd_parallel_north. 511. University of Illinois Chicago. Accessed: 15/06/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Illinois_Chicago.

512. Chromosome 21. Accessed: 31/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chromosome_21.

513. Down syndrome. Accessed: 06/07/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Down_syndrome.

514. The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. Accessed: 28/04/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hitchhiker%27s_Guide_to_the_Galaxy.

515. Internal Revenue Service (IRS). Accessed: 15/06/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internal_Revenue_Service.

516. Steve Selvin. Accessed: 05/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Selvin. 517. Mystery Jets. Accessed: 13/06/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mystery_Jets. 518. Mystery Jets - Twenty One (2007–2008). Accessed: 14/06/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mystery_Jets#Twenty_One_(2007%E2%80%932008). 519. Financial crisis of 2008-2008 - Timeline. Accessed: 24/05/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Financial_crisis_of_2007%E2%80%932008#Timeline. 520. What Happened on January 8, 2009. Accessed: 22/05/2022; Available on:

https://www.onthisday.com/date/2009/january/8. 521. Bertoni, G., J. Daemen, M. Peeters, and G.V. Assche Sakura: a flexible coding for tree hashing.

Cryptology ePrint Archive, 2013. Paper 2013/231. 522. Bernstein, D.J., High-speed cryptographic functions, in Workshop on Cryptography and Related

Mathematics. 2006: Chuo University, Tokyo, Japan 523. Vault 7: CIA Hacking Tools Revealed. Accessed: 23/06/2022; Available on:

https://wikileaks.org/ciav7p1/. 524. SEC Issues Investigative Report Concluding DAO Tokens, a Digital Asset, Were Securities. 2017;

Accessed: July 24; Available on: https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2017-131. 525. Eurozone. Accessed: 23/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eurozone. 526. Dot-com bubble. Accessed: 10/06/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dot-

com_bubble. 527. Category:Modern cryptographers. Accessed: 16/06/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Modern_cryptographers. 528. (@hashbreaker), D.J.B. Sakai, Ohgishi, Kasahara published pairing-based identity-based

crypto in 2000. It's outrageous that the Gödel prize didn't include them. 2013 Published: 07/06/2013; Accessed: 16/06/2022; Available on: https://twitter.com/hashbreaker/status/343116163527622656.

529. Hunter, M. Daniel Bernstein – The Reason Bitcoin Can’t Be Outlawed. 2021 Published: 22/08/2021; Accessed: 01/05/2022; Available on: https://fullycrypto.com/daniel-bernstein-the-reason-bitcoin-cant-be-outlawed.

530. Daniel J. Bernstein at Google Scholar. Accessed: 16/06/2022; Available on: https://scholar.google.com/citations?hl=en&user=ToxxF5oAAAAJ.

531. Bernstein, D.J. Snuffle. Accessed: 16/06/2022; Available on: https://cryptography.fandom.com/wiki/Snuffle.

532. New York University. Accessed: 15/06/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_University.

533. Leiden University. Accessed: 16/06/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leiden_University.

534. CASA - Cyber Security in the Age of Large-Scale Adversaries. Accessed: 15/06/2022; Available on: https://casa.rub.de/en/.

535. Ruhr University Bochum. Accessed: 15/06/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruhr_University_Bochum.

536. Tanja Lange's homepage. Accessed: 16/06/2022; Available on: http://hyperelliptic.org/tanja/. 537. Eindhoven Institute for the Protection of Systems and Information (Ei/Psi). Accessed:

16/06/2022; Available on: https://www.win.tue.nl/eipsi/. 538. Tanja Lange. Accessed: 17/06/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tanja_Lange. 539. Eindhoven University of Technology. Accessed: 15/06/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eindhoven_University_of_Technology. 540. Bernstein, D. Syn cookies. Accessed: 22/06/2022; Available on:

http://cr.yp.to/syncookies.html. 541. Bernstein, D.J. D. J. Bernstein - Talks. Accessed: 15/06/2022; Available on:

https://cr.yp.to/talks.html. 542. Chuo University. Accessed: 16/06/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chuo_University. 543. Yasuda, T., T. Takagi, and K. Sakurai Efficient Rainbow Digital Signature Method Without

Triangular Matrix Display. 2012. 2012.22, 1-8. 544. Kanji. Accessed: 16/06/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kanji. 545. Kouichi Sakurai. Accessed: 16/06/2022; Available on: https://hyoka.ofc.kyushu-

u.ac.jp/search/details/K000220/english.html. 546. Kyushu University. Accessed: 16/06/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyushu_University. 547. Fukuoka. Accessed: 16/06/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fukuoka. 548. Bernstein, D.J., Introduction to post-quantum cryptography, in Post-Quantum Cryptography,

D.J. Bernstein, J. Buchmann, and E. Dahmen, Editors. 2009, Springer Berlin Heidelberg: Berlin, Heidelberg. p. 1-14.

549. Bernstein, D.J., J. Buchmann, and E. Dahmen, eds. Post-Quantum Cryptography. 2009, Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg. 246.

550. Wright, C. The story of Bitcoin, continued. 2019; Accessed: 24/06/2022; Available on: https://medium.com/@craig_10243/the-story-of-bitcoin-continued-2f1ec78ba38b.

551. Wright, C. Careful what you wish for…. 2019 Published: 08/02/2019; Accessed: 08/02/2019; Available on: https://medium.com/@craig_10243/careful-what-you-wish-for-c7c2f19e6c4f.

552. Funcheon, D. Kleiman v. Wright: Craig Wright Takes Stand Again in Final Day of Testimony. 2021 Published: 23/11/2021; Accessed: 24/06/2022; Available on: https://www.coindesk.com/business/2021/11/23/kleiman-v-wright-craig-wright-takes-stand-again-in-final-day-of-testimony/.

553. Craig Steven Wright. Accessed: 26/06/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Craig_Steven_Wright.

554. Greenberg, A. New Clues Suggest Craig Wright, Suspected Bitcoin Creator, May Be a Hoaxer. 2015; Accessed: 27/04/2022; Available on: https://www.wired.com/2015/12/new-clues-suggest-satoshi-suspect-craig-wright-may-be-a-hoaxer/.

555. Satoshi Nakamoto - Craig Wright. Accessed: 26/06/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satoshi_Nakamoto#Craig_Wright.

556. Corfield, G. Bitcoin 'inventor' will face forgery claims over his Satoshi Nakamoto proof, rules High Court. 2022 Published: 06/01/2022; Accessed: 07/07/2022; Available on: https://www.theregister.com/2022/01/06/craig_wright_satoshi_nakamoto_forgery_claims/.

557. Khaosan, V. Craig Wright Is Not Satoshi Nakamoto – the Technical Proof. 2016 Published: 04/03/2021; Accessed: 07/07/2022; Available on: https://www.ccn.com/technical-proof-craig-wright-not-satoshi-nakamoto/.

558. vistomail.com, s.a. [bitcoin-dev] Not this again. - "I am not Craig Wright. We are all Satoshi.". 2015 Published: 10/12/2015; Accessed: 07/07/2022; Available on: https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-December/011936.html.

559. Shevchenko, A. Early Bitcoin Miner Calls Craig Wright a Fraud Through ‘His Own’ Addresses. 2020 Published: 25/05/2020; Accessed: 07/07/2022; Available on: https://cointelegraph.com/news/early-bitcoin-miner-calls-craig-wright-a-fraud-through-his-own-addresses.

560. Wright Craig Declared a Fraud — Judge Not Convinced With His Claims. 2021 Published: 11/10/2021; Accessed: 07/07/2022; Available on: https://www.investing.com/news/cryptocurrency-news/wright-craig-declared-a-fraud--judge-not-convinced-with-his-claims-2639756.

561. Hern, A. Craig Wright's claim to be bitcoin founder labelled a 'scam'. 2016 Published: 03/05/2016; Accessed: 07/07/2022; Available on: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/may/03/craig-wright-bitcoin-founder-claim-labelled-scam-satoshi-nakamoto.

562. Lee, T.B. Judge savages self-proclaimed bitcoin inventor Craig Wright. 2019 Published: 28/09/2019; Accessed: 07/07/2022; Available on: https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2019/08/judge-blasts-intentionally-false-testimony-by-supposed-bitcoin-creator/.

563. Crypto Open Patent Alliance (COPA). Accessed: 07/07/2022; Available on: https://www.opencrypto.org/.

564. Southurst, J. COPA launches High Court action against Craig Wright’s Bitcoin copyright claims. 2021 Published: 13/04/2021; Accessed: 07/07/2022; Available on: https://coingeek.com/coinbase-backed-copa-launches-action-against-bitcoin-inventor-craig-wright/.

565. SegWit. Accessed: 26/06/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SegWit. 566. List of bitcoin forks - Taproot. Accessed: 26/06/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_bitcoin_forks#Taproot. 567. Atkins, J. Wright v McCormack concludes on Day 3 as both sides make closing arguments. 2022

Published: 26/05/2022; Accessed: 07/07/2022; Available on: https://coingeek.com/wright-v-mccormack-concludes-on-day-3-as-both-sides-make-closing-arguments/.

568. 2007. Accessed: 06/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2007. 569. 2009. Accessed: 16/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009. 570. 2010. Accessed: 16/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010. 571. 2011. Accessed: 16/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011. 572. 2008 Summer Olympics. Accessed: 19/05/2022; Available on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_Summer_Olympics. 573. What Happened on August 18, 2008. Accessed: 19/05/2022; Available on:

https://www.onthisday.com/date/2008/august/18. 574. Twenty-One Tremendous Facts About The Number 21. Published: 08/04/2022; Accessed:

30/04/2022; Available on: https://www.thefactsite.com/number-21-facts/. 575. Cox, K. 21 things to know about the number 21 for 2021. 2021; Accessed: 10/05/2021;

Available on: https://www.scmp.com/yp/discover/lifestyle/article/3116619/21-things-know-about-number-21.

576. Twenty-One Demands. Accessed: 10/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twenty-One_Demands.

577. Numerology. Accessed: 19/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Numerology.

578. Associates, I.M. Visionary Bitcoin Creator Satoshi Nakamoto to Reveal Identity. 2019 Published: 16/08/2019; Accessed: 19/05/2022; Available on: https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2019/08/16/1903230/0/en/Visionary-Bitcoin-Creator-Satoshi-Nakamoto-to-Reveal-Identity.html.

579. Chaldean Numerology – a deeper understanding. Accessed: 19/05/2022; Available on: https://numerologytoolbox.com/numerology/chaldean-numerology/.

580. Neo-Babylonian Empire. Accessed: 19/05/2022; Available on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neo-Babylonian_Empire.

Appendix Request for Comment to “Satoshi Nakamoto” The present work produced a hypothetical biography, psychogram and mindset of Satoshi Nakamoto at the time of conceiving, developing, releasing, improving and departing from his brainchild Bitcoin. Table 2 lists a diverse collection of items that a Satoshi Nakamoto candidate could be asked to comment on, including suggest impact weighting. As many items are derived from circumstantial evidence, it is to be expected that candidates would not be able to have any meaningful comment on them, and may then be “allowed” to just delete a certain number of them.

Table 2 ‘Request for comment’ catalogue for proposed or self-appointed Satoshi Nakamoto candidates. Each entry has an impact factor between 0 (lowest) and 5; columns with a threshold with a score, and a weighted result (impact × score) may be appended. Moreover, a certain number – say 10 – of less-relevant lines, e.g., possessing an impact of less than 3, may be deleted from this compilation.

Historical Excerpts related to Satoshi Nakamoto & Bitcoin Events that possibly impacted Satoshi Nakamoto for conceiving Bitcoin in 2007 [568], the publication of the Bitcoin whitepaper in 2008 [395], containing an unusual reference to 1957 [319], the launch of the Bitcoin blockchain in 2009 [569], and his active years of Bitcoin development 2009 [569] and 2010 [570], and his final email messages in 2011 [571].

Year 1957 [319] • March 4 – Standard & Poor's first publishes the S&P 500 Index in the United States. • April – IBM sells the first compiler for the Fortran scientific programming language. • May 3 – Brooklyn Dodgers owner Walter O'Malley agrees to move the team from Brooklyn,

New York, to Los Angeles. • September 9 – The Civil Rights Act of 1957 is enacted, establishing the United States

Commission on Civil Rights.

Impact

Born around mid-1970s 4Formative cultures: UK & North America 4English: (quasi) native fluency 4Temporarily without internet connection 3Ethnic minority / expatriate 1

Interest for cypherpunk movement in 2000s 3Time for creating Bitcoin in 2007/2008 4The Times headline in Genesis block 0 4Gap between blocks 0 and 1 in January 2009 4Design parameters: 21, 42 & binary operators 3

Citation [2]: Benelux meeting 3Citation [8]: 1957 book 3Adding hashcash, b-money post-scriptum 3Leaving out: Chaum's work, Szabo's Bit Gold 3

USA / Britain (Europe) 3Stay in North-American or GMT time zones 3Bay Area, Los Angeles, Boston 3Tokyo / Japan

Genius 4Creative 3Reclusive 3Privacy conscious 5Passionate about ideals 4Resolve for working extremely hard 3Seemingly erratic decision making at times 1Falling out of the norm 2Mental condition 1

Cypherpunk 3Libertarian 3Aversion against legacy banking system 4Ultrasound money 4

Bio

Bitcoin

Location

Character

Ideals

Whitepaper

Impact

Cryptography 4Cryptocurrency 4Computer science 3C++ programming skills 5Mathematics / STEM 3Distributed systems 3Network computing 3Game theory 2Financial systems 3Law: Freedom of speech & financial regulation 2

Fast-tracked education 3Scholarships & awards 2Brief exposure to scientific publishing 2

Not highly accomplished, academic researcher 2Experience with intelligence service 3Experience with corporate cybersecurity 2

British spelling 4Two spaces after period 4Initials "NS" in Bitcoin address 4Strategic games (e.g., Chess, Blackjack) 3Pattern recognition, symbolism 3Link to Japan, e.g., travel, culture, language 2Link toSakura House, Nakano-sakaue 2Connection to Michael Weber 1Striking frequency of "Saturdays" 2Benelux meeting in 1999 in citations 31957-edition of textbook in citations 3

Reason for not coming out 5Not sending on- or off-chain messages 5Resisting to touch 2009-BTC 5Continued involvement in Bitcoin / crypto 1Involvement in new, exciting projects 1

Education & Academia

Job History

Pecularities

Post departure

Competences

• October 04 - Space Age – Sputnik program: The Soviet Union launches Sputnik 1, the first artificial satellite to orbit the earth.

• October 10 - U.S. President Dwight D. Eisenhower apologizes to the finance minister of Ghana, Komla Agbeli Gbedemah, after he was refused service in a Dover, Delaware, restaurant.

• October 31 – Toyota begins exporting vehicles to the United States, beginning with the Toyota Crown and the Toyota Land Cruiser.

• November 3 – Sputnik program: The Soviet Union launches Sputnik 2, with the first animal to orbit the Earth (a dog named Laika) on board; there is no technology available to return it to Earth.

Year 1975 [254] • January 1 – Watergate scandal (United States): John N. Mitchell, H. R. Haldeman and John

Ehrlichman are found guilty of the Watergate cover-up. • January 8 – U.S. President Gerald Ford appoints Vice President Nelson Rockefeller to head a

special commission looking into alleged domestic abuses by the CIA. • February 21 – Watergate scandal: Former United States Attorney General John N. Mitchell,

and former White House aides H. R. Haldeman and John Ehrlichman, are sentenced to between 30 months and 8 years in prison.

• April 3 – Bobby Fischer refuses to play in a chess match against Anatoly Karpov, giving Karpov the title.

• April 4 – Bill Gates and Paul Allen found Microsoft in Albuquerque, New Mexico. • April 5 – Satoshi Nakamoto is “born” [240, 241]. • June 10 – In Washington, D.C., the Rockefeller Commission issues its report on CIA abuses,

recommending a joint congressional oversight committee on intelligence. • October 1 – Thrilla in Manila: Muhammad Ali defeats Joe Frazier in a boxing match in Manila,

Philippines. • October 31 – The Queen single "Bohemian Rhapsody" is released. It later becomes one of their

most popular songs. • November 29 – The name "Micro-soft" (for microcomputer software) is used by Bill Gates in

a letter to Paul Allen for the first time (Microsoft becomes a registered trademark on November 26, 1976).

• December 8 – New York City is approved for bailout of 2.3 billion each year through 1978 – 6.9 billion total.

Year 2007 [568] • May – Forerunners of financial crisis [394, 519] • 29/06/2007 The iPhone, the first modern smartphone, is released in the United States. It

was later released in the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Portugal, the Republic of Ireland and Austria in November 2007.

• 07/11/2007 Whistle-blower website WikiLeaks leaks the standard US army protocol at Guantanamo Bay.

Year 2008 [395] • 01/01/2008 Cyprus and Malta adopt the euro currency. • 21/01/2008 Stock markets around the world plunge amid growing fears of a U.S. Great

Recession, fueled by the 2007 subprime mortgage crisis. • 21/01/2008 Online activist group Anonymous initiates Project Chanology, after a leaked

interview of Tom Cruise by the Church of Scientology is published on YouTube, and the Church of Scientology issued a "copyright infringement" claim. In response, Anonymous sympathizers

took to the streets to protest outside the church (after February 10), while the church's websites and centers were getting DoS attacks, phone line nukes, and black faxes.

• 18/02/2008 WikiLeaks releases allegations of illegal activities carried out by the Cayman Islands branch of Swiss banking corporation Julius Baer; a subsequent lawsuit against WikiLeaks prompts a temporary suspension of the website, but uproar about violations of freedom of speech causes WikiLeaks to be brought back online.

• 09/15/2008 Stocks fall sharply Monday on a triptych of Wall Street woe: Lehman Brothers' bankruptcy filing, Merrill Lynch's acquisition by Bank of America, and AIG's unprecedented request for short-term financing from the Federal Reserve.

• 29/09/2008 Following the bankruptcies of Lehman Brothers and Washington Mutual, The Dow Jones Industrial Average falls 777.68 points, hitherto the largest single-day point loss in its history.

• 03/10/2008 Global financial crisis : U.S. President George W. Bush signs the revised Emergency Economic Stabilization Act into law, creating a 700-billion-dollar Treasury fund to purchase failing bank assets.

• 31/10/2008 Satoshi Nakamoto releases Bitcoin whitepaper • 04/11/2008 Democratic U.S. Senator Barack Obama is elected the 44th President of the

United States, making him the first African-American president. • Beijing Olympics (08-24 August 2008 [572])

o Olympics were big mainstream news these weeks of August 2008 o Satoshi Nakamoto was evidently not much interested in following sports o Registering domain bitcoin.org [122, 123] on 18/08/2008 [573] o Communication with Adam Back and Wei Dai o Final stages of authoring whitepaper and coding Bitcoin

Year 2009 [569] • January 28 – WikiLeaks releases 86 intercepted telephone recordings of politicians and

businessmen involved in the 2008 Peru oil scandal • June 25 – The death of American pop star Michael Jackson triggers an outpouring of

worldwide grief. Online, reactions to the event cripple several major websites and services, as the abundance of people accessing the web addresses pushes internet traffic to unprecedented and historic levels.

• July 22 – The longest total solar eclipse of the 21st century, lasting up to 6 minutes and 38.86 seconds (0.14 seconds shorter than 6 minutes and 39 seconds), occurs over parts of Asia and the Pacific Ocean.

• September 22 – WikiLeaks exposes the contents of Kaupthing Bank's internal documents prior to the Icelandic Financial Crisis. These documents showed suspicious amounts of money were loaned to bank owners, and debts being written off.

• WikiLeaks leaked the membership listing of a radical political group known as the British National Party.

Year 2010 [570] • April 3 – The first iPad was released. • April 5 - Julian Assange leaks footage of a 2007 airstrike in Iraq titled "Collateral Murder" on

the website WikiLeaks. • May 2 – The eurozone and the International Monetary Fund agree to a €110 billion bailout

package for Greece. The package involves sharp Greek austerity measures.

• May 6 – The 2010 Flash Crash, a trillion-dollar stock market crash, occurs over 36 minutes, initiated by a series of automated trading programs in a feedback loop.

• July 13 – Microsoft ends extended support for Windows 2000. • October 6 – Instagram was launched. • October 23 – In preparation for the Seoul summit, finance ministers of the G-20 agree to

reform the International Monetary Fund and shift 6% of the voting shares to developing nations and countries with emerging markets.

• November 17 – Researchers at CERN trap 38 antihydrogen atoms for a sixth of a second, marking the first time in history that humans have trapped antimatter.

• November 21 – Eurozone countries agree to a rescue package for the Republic of Ireland from the European Financial Stability Facility in response to the country's financial crisis.

• November 28 – WikiLeaks releases a collection of more than 250,000 American diplomatic cables, including 100,000 marked "secret" or "confidential".

• November 29 – The European Union agree to an €85 billion rescue deal for Ireland from the European Financial Stability Facility, the International Monetary Fund and bilateral loans from the United Kingdom, Denmark and Sweden.

Year 2011 [571] • 01/01 Estonia officially adopts the Euro currency and becomes the 17th Eurozone country. • April 24 – The 2011 Guantanamo Bay files leak occurs, WikiLeaks and other organisations

publishing 779 classified documents about Guantanamo Bay detainees, and it had been exposed 150 innocent citizens from Afghanistan and Pakistan were held in the camp without trial and detainees being as young as 14 years old.

• May 1 – U.S. President Barack Obama announces that Osama bin Laden, the founder and leader of the militant group Al-Qaeda, was killed on May 2, 2011 (PKT, UTC+05) during an American military operation in Pakistan.

• May 16 – The European Union agrees to a €78 billion rescue deal for Portugal. The bailout loan will be equally split between the European Financial Stabilization Mechanism, the European Financial Stability Facility, and the International Monetary Fund.

• August – Stock exchanges worldwide suffer heavy losses due to the fears of contagion of the European sovereign debt crisis and the credit rating downgraded as a result of the debt-ceiling crisis of the United States.

• September 17 – Occupy Wall Street protests begin in the United States. This develops into the Occupy movement which spreads to 82 countries by October.

• October 27 – After an emergency meeting in Brussels, the European Union announces an agreement to tackle the European sovereign debt crisis which includes a writedown of 50% of Greek bonds, a recapitalization of European banks and an increase of the bailout fund of the European Financial Stability Facility totaling to €1 trillion.

Sum Fun Facts 21 [574, 575]

• 21 is the name of an ancient card game (s. Movie “21”), with its most modern variant played in casinos all over the world. This more commonly known version is the American game Blackjack.

• 21 is the atomic number of the chemical element scandium. Discovered in 1879, it is classified as a rare-earth element.

• The 21st amendment of the US constitution actually negated the effects of the 18th amendment, which was originally put in place to prohibit alcohol on a national scale.

• According to the Bible there were 21 acts of rebellion committed by the Israelites to break free from Egyptian control.

• In Tarot, the number 21 is related to the card The World. One of the many meanings of this card is to have the world at your feet!

• There were 21 shillings in a guinea, a form of currency used by Great Britain from 1663 all the way until 1816, when they were replaced by the pound.

• During the First World War the Japanese Empire sent a list of 21 demands to the Chinese government. These demands were related to the control of the region of Manchuria, and were opposed by the UK and the US [576].

• 21 guns are fired to honor heads of state, such as royalty in the UK, and the President of the USA. Known as the 21-gun salute, this tradition goes all the way back to the times when the navies of the world still shot cannonballs.

• The summer and winter solstices take place (usually) on June 21 and December 21 respectively.

• There is a lake in the US state of Minnesota called Twentyone Lake. • 21 is a triangle number – it is the sum of the first six whole numbers (1+2+3+4+5+6=21). • A game of badminton ends when a player reaches 21 points. • Three-on-three basketball, aka 3x3, is a single period of 10 minutes, with the winner the first

team to score 21 points (or be closest to 21 at the end of 10 minutes). • 21 in Roman numerals is XXI. • Forever 21 in Tokyo, Japan (closed 2019) [350]

4 and 44 • 4 sounds like “death” in Chinese, making it an unlucky number • Now, at least two new spires in Boston are skipping the 44th floor (and one the fourth floor)

in deference to the superstitions of expected buyers from East Asia, particularly China

Numerology Possibly just for the fun of it, Satoshi Nakamoto might also resorted to numerology [577], which is the pseudoscientific belief in a divine or mystical relationship between a number, and one or more attributes. It is also the study of the numerical value of the letters in words, names, and ideas. Numerology is often associated with the paranormal, alongside astrology and similar to divinatory arts. While this connection is highly speculative, it is still interesting, or at least entertaining, to look at a rather abstruse article in advance of 11th anniversary of the registration of bitcoin.org on 18/08/2008 [578]. This publication establishes a relationship between Bitcoin and the (undocumented) numerology [579] of the Chaldean or Neo-Babylonian Empire [580]: “The compound number of 21/3 means that one wants to crack the code into gaining ultimate success that will be ever ongoing throughout one’s entire life. However, if it is unbalanced, one will have the feeling of often being close to the total success, but the success seems further away than initially anticipated. Therefore, if it’s unbalanced, one’s life might feel like walking through a tunnel of a constant learning process.”