Top Banner
IMPLEMENTATION OF RADAR ALGORITHMS ON AN ACOUSTIC ARRAY Sarah Middleton Supervised by: Anton van Wyk, Jacques Cilliers, Pascale Jardin and Florence Nadal 3 December 2010
20

Sarah Middleton Supervised by: Anton van Wyk, Jacques Cilliers, Pascale Jardin and Florence Nadal 3 December 2010.

Dec 24, 2015

Download

Documents

Laurel Miller
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Sarah Middleton Supervised by: Anton van Wyk, Jacques Cilliers, Pascale Jardin and Florence Nadal 3 December 2010.

IMPLEMENTATION OF RADAR

ALGORITHMS ON AN ACOUSTIC

ARRAY

Sarah MiddletonSupervised by: Anton van Wyk, Jacques Cilliers,

Pascale Jardin and Florence Nadal

3 December 2010

Page 2: Sarah Middleton Supervised by: Anton van Wyk, Jacques Cilliers, Pascale Jardin and Florence Nadal 3 December 2010.

OVERVIEW1. Introduction to Phased Array Radar

versus MIMO Radar.2. Project Objectives.3. The Acoustic Array Hardware System.4. Testing Procedures.5. Beampattern Measurements.6. Target Parameter Estimation Results.7. Conclusion.

Page 3: Sarah Middleton Supervised by: Anton van Wyk, Jacques Cilliers, Pascale Jardin and Florence Nadal 3 December 2010.

PHASED ARRAY AND MIMO Phased array

The ith element transmits a base signal multiplied by a complex weight wi.

The signals sum constructively and destructively to form a high powered beam in a desired direction.

MIMO Each element transmits a signal

which is orthogonal to all of the other signals.

This allows an omnidirectional pattern to be transmitted, and increases the degrees of freedom.

0

1

2

L-2

L-1

wavefront

ΔτL-1

ΔτL-2

Δτ2

Δτ1

Page 4: Sarah Middleton Supervised by: Anton van Wyk, Jacques Cilliers, Pascale Jardin and Florence Nadal 3 December 2010.

TRANSMITTER BEAMFORMING ON RECEPTION If a set of orthogonal signals is transmitted, a matched filter bank can

be used to extract the signals from the received signal. Transmitter beamforming can then be applied to the signals, after

they have been received. This also has the effect of increasing the effective array aperture. Also, the radar field of view can be scanned for targets after the

transmission of a single burst.

Page 5: Sarah Middleton Supervised by: Anton van Wyk, Jacques Cilliers, Pascale Jardin and Florence Nadal 3 December 2010.

INCREASED ARRAY APERTURE

Page 6: Sarah Middleton Supervised by: Anton van Wyk, Jacques Cilliers, Pascale Jardin and Florence Nadal 3 December 2010.

PROJECT OBJECTIVES

• Design and build a transmitter array which can be used to demonstrate radar array techniques.

Transmitter Array

• Compare the patterns that can be formed with phased array and MIMO techniques.

Beampattern Design

• Compare the accuracy and resolution of phased array and MIMO target range and angle estimation techniques.

Parameter Estimation

Literature Review -> Simulation -> Hardware Design -> Testing -> Results Analysis

Approach

Page 7: Sarah Middleton Supervised by: Anton van Wyk, Jacques Cilliers, Pascale Jardin and Florence Nadal 3 December 2010.

THE HARDWARE SYSTEM

Receiver ArrayTransmitter Array

Master Control Unit (MCU)Implemented on an FPGA.

PCC application receives Ethernet packets from MCU.

Matlab applications perform signal processing.

Page 8: Sarah Middleton Supervised by: Anton van Wyk, Jacques Cilliers, Pascale Jardin and Florence Nadal 3 December 2010.

TRANSMITTER ARRAY

16 small speakers make up the transmitter array.

The transmitter analogue board consists of: A digital to analogue converter. A low-pass reconstruction filter. A Class AB audio amplifier.

Page 9: Sarah Middleton Supervised by: Anton van Wyk, Jacques Cilliers, Pascale Jardin and Florence Nadal 3 December 2010.

RECEIVER ARRAY

16 small microphones are configured as a ULA.

The receiver analogue electronics consists of: An amplifier board. An second amplifier stage. A low-pass anti-aliasing filter. An analogue to digital converter.

Page 10: Sarah Middleton Supervised by: Anton van Wyk, Jacques Cilliers, Pascale Jardin and Florence Nadal 3 December 2010.

MASTER CONTROL UNIT (MCU)

Finish

Transmit 400 samples on 16 channels.

Receive 800 samples on 16 channels.

Send received signal over Ethernet.

Start

Xilinx Virtex 5 on an ML505 development board.

Page 11: Sarah Middleton Supervised by: Anton van Wyk, Jacques Cilliers, Pascale Jardin and Florence Nadal 3 December 2010.

PC

The PC is responsible for Designing the set of 16 signals which combine to give a

desired pattern. Receiving Ethernet packets from the MCU. Converting the data in the Ethernet Packet into the

voltages that it represents. Calibrate the received signal. Band-pass filtering, demodulating and low-pass

filtering the signals. Applying parameter estimation algorithms to

determine the target locations.

Page 12: Sarah Middleton Supervised by: Anton van Wyk, Jacques Cilliers, Pascale Jardin and Florence Nadal 3 December 2010.

TESTING Testing was performed in an anechoic chamber. The sampling frequency was 40 kHz. The chirp bandwidth or MIMO signal symbol

frequency was 4 kHz. The carrier frequency was 10 kHz. Transmitted signal duration was 10 ms.

Page 13: Sarah Middleton Supervised by: Anton van Wyk, Jacques Cilliers, Pascale Jardin and Florence Nadal 3 December 2010.

PATTERNS WITH ONE MAIN LOBE

The phased array andMIMO patterns are verysimilar, but the power ofthe phased array pattern isapproximately 7 dB higher.

Page 14: Sarah Middleton Supervised by: Anton van Wyk, Jacques Cilliers, Pascale Jardin and Florence Nadal 3 December 2010.

PATTERNS WITH THREE MAIN LOBES

The side lobe levels of the measured signals are higher than the simulated signals.

Page 15: Sarah Middleton Supervised by: Anton van Wyk, Jacques Cilliers, Pascale Jardin and Florence Nadal 3 December 2010.

OMNIDIRECTIONAL PATTERN

Between -60° and 60°, the measured pattern has about 3.5 dB variation making it significantly more omnidirectional than the other patterns.

Page 16: Sarah Middleton Supervised by: Anton van Wyk, Jacques Cilliers, Pascale Jardin and Florence Nadal 3 December 2010.

PARAMETER ESTIMATION WITH ONE TARGET

Phased Array

MIMO

Page 17: Sarah Middleton Supervised by: Anton van Wyk, Jacques Cilliers, Pascale Jardin and Florence Nadal 3 December 2010.

ALGORITHM COMPARISONPhased Array Rank MIMO RankConventional Beamformer + Capon Beamformer +

Capon Beamformer + Amplitude and phase estimation (APES)

-

Music Algorithm + Generalised Likelihood Ratio Test (GLRT)

+

Deterministic Maximum Likelihood (DML)

- Approximate Maximum Likelihood (AML)

?

Transmitter Beamforming on Reception

++

MIMO Transmitter Beampattern Design RankOmnidirectional Pattern -

Maximum Power Design --Pascales Design +Beampattern Matching Design +

Page 18: Sarah Middleton Supervised by: Anton van Wyk, Jacques Cilliers, Pascale Jardin and Florence Nadal 3 December 2010.

PARAMETER ESTIMATIONWITH THREE TARGETS

Phased Array

MIMO

Page 19: Sarah Middleton Supervised by: Anton van Wyk, Jacques Cilliers, Pascale Jardin and Florence Nadal 3 December 2010.

CONCLUSION An acoustic array hardware system has been

successfully built and tested. Beampatterns which transmit power

omnidirectionally, in one direction and in three directions have been generated.

Target parameter estimation shows: A corner reflector target can be detected. MIMO techniques can provide higher angular

resolution estimates.

Page 20: Sarah Middleton Supervised by: Anton van Wyk, Jacques Cilliers, Pascale Jardin and Florence Nadal 3 December 2010.

THANK YOU!

ANY QUESTIONS?