Page 1
Sarah and Hagar in Christian Retellings
Page 1 of 32
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofDenver; date: 27 October 2015
UniversityPressScholarshipOnline
OxfordScholarshipOnline
SharedStories,RivalTellings:EarlyEncountersofJews,Christians,andMuslimsRobertC.Gregg
Printpublicationdate:2015PrintISBN-13:9780190231491PublishedtoOxfordScholarshipOnline:August2015DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190231491.001.0001
SarahandHagarinChristianRetellings
RobertC.Gregg
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190231491.003.0008
AbstractandKeywords
St.Paul’srecastingofSarahandHagarinhisbriefallegory(Galatians4:21–31)allowedhim(andhisChristiansuccessors)toassertthatGod’scovenantwithAbrahamnowbelongedtothebelieversthatJesuswastheMessiah,andnottohisJewishdetractors.Itfelltothechurches’theologians,preachers,andartiststodemonstratethesignificanceofthevisitingangels’announcementofIsaac’sfuturebirthtoSarahandAbraham.AtypologicalinterpretationproposedthatthetidingsofIsaac’smiraculousbirthtoSarahprefiguredtheannunciationtoMarythevirginofJesus’sbirth(Luke1:26–38).Origen,thefamedthird-centurythinkerandpreacherdisplayshisapplicationsofliteral,allegorical,andspiritualinterpretationinhissermon,OnthebirthofIsaacandthefactthatheisweaned.AnalysesoffourpiecesofChristianartcompletethechapter.
Keywords:Paul,allegory,Origen,annunciation,Sta.MariaMaggiore
Page 2
Sarah and Hagar in Christian Retellings
Page 2 of 32
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofDenver; date: 27 October 2015
WhenearliestbelieversthatJesuswasGod’smessiahclaimedthattheywerenowGod’scovenantpeople,theywereobligedtoexplaintheirrelationtoAbraham,andtohistwowomen.AprovocativeobservationbyElizabethClarkisagoodonetoplaceoverthischapter—andtotestasweproceed:
ExegesesofthestoriesofHagar,Sarah,andAbrahambythechurchfatherswerebornofneeds,astheyperceivedthem,oftheirowndays....[Their]mainconcernistodefendthehonorandreputationofAbraham,theforefatheroftheMessiah,oftenattheexpenseofthewomenwithwhomhesharesthestory.ThatSarahandHagarare“used”bytheFatherstoillustrateotherpointsofChristiantheologyshows,aboveallelse,thathoweverlittleconcerntheyhadforthesefemalecharactersintheirownright,they,likewomenelsewhere,were“good”formen“tothinkwith.”
ElizabethA.Clark,“InterpretiveFateandtheChurchFathers”1
ForJewsandChristiansonlythecouple,AbrahamandSarah,andtheirsonIsaacheldcentralimportance.Withthat“side”ofthepatriarch’sfamily,theBiblemadeclear,God’scovenantanditspromiseswereoperative.Sarah,then,hadthestatusofreveredmatriarch—itwashersonandhisownoffspringwhowereespeciallyblessed.Christianity’sassertionthatitbecamethatAbrahamic“family,”thepreferredandchosenpeopleofGod,wasattheheartofJewish-Christiandebateanddifference,andwilloccupyusinthefollowingpages.IslamexultsinthedivinewillthatbroughtintobeingfatherIbrahimtheprophet,andcelebratesespeciallyIshmaelandhisprogeny,fromwhomcontinuedthatlineofGod’semmisariesthroughthe(p.155) centuries—downtotheappearanceofMuhammad.Hagar,atonepointcalled“motheroftheArabs,”isthewifeofIbrahimtowhomMuslimsgivespecialhonor.
Wehaveseentherabbis’judgmentsofSarahandHagarinconflict.WhatkindsofvaluationsofthetwowomendidearlyChristiansreach,andwhatbecameoftheirpersonaeasscripturalcharacterswhenpreachers,theologians,andartistsexpandedupontheiridentitiesandtheirsignificances?Inparticular,whatinterpretivefatewillbefallHagar?
St.PaulonSarahandHagarandTheirSons
Galatians4:21–31
NoearlyChristianwriter’suseofSarahandHagar“tothinkwith”wasmoreinfluentialthanPaul’s,eventhoughtwootherpassagesintheNewTestamenteffectivelyfashionedSarahintotheexampleofwifelyobedience(1Peter3:6)andoflifelived“byfaith”(Hebrews11:11).2TherecipientsoftheEpistletotheGalatians,whichPaulsentsometimeintheearly50sCE,couldonlyhavebeensurprisedbyhisanalysisoftheSarah-Hagarstoryinhisletter.TakinglibertieswithtraditionalJewishunderstandingsoftheGenesisnarrative,PaulradicallyreimaginedAbraham’sfamilyintermsconsistentwiththerevelationhehimselfhadexperienced.Hisconversioncausedhimtoleavebehindhis“earlierlifeinJudaism”(anaccountofwhichhegivesinGalatians1:11–2:14)
Page 3
Sarah and Hagar in Christian Retellings
Page 3 of 32
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofDenver; date: 27 October 2015
andbecomethe“apostle[ofGod]totheGentiles”(Galatians2:8;Romans11:13).Abrahamandhisfamilyarethusinterpretedinawayconsistentwiththe“gospelfortheuncircumcised”(2:7)thathepreached,apparentlypersuasively,tothecongregationsinthisareainAsiaMinor.
TheunexpectedmeaningsPaulderivesfromthetaleofSarahandHagarandtheirtwosonshavechallengedcommentatorsthroughthecenturies,includingmodernscholarsoftheNewTestamentandthosewhoinvestigatethehistoryofrelationsbetweenJewsandChristians.Largeissuesareatstake.PaulassertsinGalatians(1)thatobediencetocommandsofGodwasnotthebasisuponwhichAbrahamwas“reckoned”orcountedrighteous;(2)thattherevealedMosaiclawwasadivineinterventionnecessarytoGod’sdealingswithhispeople,butthatitspurposeandeffectshadbeensurpassedintheremovalofthe“curse”uponhumankindbyJesus’sdeathonthecross;(3)thatthelaw,whichisimpossibleformenandwomentoobeyinitsentirety,isanegativeweight,aburden,aformofslavery(aviewpeculiartoPaulamongfirst-centuryJewishteachers);3and(4)that“works”ordeedsundertakentosatisfytherequirementsofJudaiclaw(p.156) havenobearinguponthesalvationnowmadeavailabletoconvertsfrom“thenations,”theGentiles,whothroughChristhavebecomechildrenofAbrahamandsonsanddaughtersofAbraham’sGod.
InthisletterPaulrespondsindeepangertowhathehaslearnedofrecenteventsinthe“churchesofGalatia.”WhenpreachingthereasonedivinelysenthehadconvertedanumberofGentilestofaithinJesusastheJewishGod’sagentofsalvation,butsubsequentlyandinhisabsenceothermissionarieshadcometotroublethefaithfulthere.Theserivalpreachersproclaimeda“differentgospel”andsought,hesays,“topervertthegospelofJesusChrist”(Galatians1:6–7).TherevelationthatPaulchampionedamongthem(whenhefirstwasintheirmidstasamissionaryandnowevermorefirmlyinthiscrisis-moment)wasthe“goodnews”thatGentile(polytheist)convertsareclaimedasGod’sownbytheirfaithinJesusChrist,andnotthroughadherencetoJewishlegalobservance.HavingbeenvisitedbyGod’sspiritwhichworkedmiraclesamongthem(Galatians3:3–5),andhavingbeenrituallycleansedfromfalsebeliefsanddestructivebehaviors(“youwerebaptizedintoChrist”(Galatians3:27)),thesebelieversarenow,together,a“newcreation,”nolonger“JeworGreek…slaveorfree…maleorfemale…butoneinChristJesus”(Galatians3:27–28).Indeed,Paulasserts,thenewlyinitiatedfaithfulhavebecometheauthentic“IsraelofGod”(Galatians6:14–18).Paul’sannouncementofwhathasbeengiventothem—freedomfromwaywardnessandtheblessingofbelongingtoGod—isthreatenedbytheinterlopers.Accordingly,heframeshisletterasanapologia:thatGreco-Romangenreoflegalspeechandwritingdesignedtorefutechargesthathavebeenbrought.
What,specifically,isPaulprotestinginhisfollow-upcommuniquétotheGalatianchurches?Thecompetingmissionaries,withtheirdeviantdoctrine,werepersuading(male)GentileconvertsthattocompleteandconfirmtheirnewconvictionthatJesusistheirsavior,itwasnecessaryforthemtobecomecircumcised—toacceptasaneffectivemarkoftheirsalvationthetraditionalsignofinclusioninGod’scovenantpeople.4Paul
Page 4
Sarah and Hagar in Christian Retellings
Page 4 of 32
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofDenver; date: 27 October 2015
denounceshisrivalmissionariesfortheirfailuretounderstandandacceptthenewrevelationandpromiseofGod—bothitsaccessibilitytohumankind,anditsliberatingforce.“Accursed”promotersofthisaliengospelintheGalatianchurcheswill,hehopes,intheirzealforcircumcising,somehow“castratethemselves”(Galatians5:12).
Theapostle’scondemnationandcursefallsalso,thoughabitlessferociously,uponthose“foolishGalatians”whohavebeendupedintotakingupJewishlawanditsobligations.Todoso,heinsists,istoforfeitthegiftGodgavetotheminthelife,suffering,death,andvictoryofChrist—thatwhich,undertheinspirationofPaul’spreachingandteaching,inspired(p.157) themandledthemtotheirnewandsavingconvictions.Reflectiveofhispostconversionretrospectiononhispersonalreligiousstruggles,asE.P.Sandersconvincinglydemonstrated,PaulpresentsapictureofJudaiclawthatholdsittobea“yoke,”aservitudethatheisconvincednowwasremovedwhenhecametoacknowledgeandtobelieveinJesus,whosedeathonthecrossentailedtakingonhimselfthesin/“curse”thathadseparatedhumankind(andcertainlytheapostlehimself)fromGod(Galatians5:1,3:10–14).5
ImportanttoPaul’sargumentagainsttheunwelcometeachingthatGentilebelieversinJesusmustundergotheJewishpracticeofcircumcisionishisowndoctrinethatAbraham’srightrelationshipwithGodcameaboutthroughthepatriarch’sfaith:“AbrahambelievedGod,anditwasreckonedtohimasrighteousness”(Genesis15:6).6Itwasnotthroughthepatriarch’sobservanceofdivinerequirementsanddemandsthathewas“justified.”Paul’sassertioncarriesthereminderthatthisencounterandtransactionbetweenAbrahamandGodprecededAbraham’scircumcision,whileitalsostatesthefact(andPaulisadamantinunderliningthis)thatMosaiclaw“camefourhundredthirtyyearslater”(i.e.,than“thepromisesmade…toAbrahamandhisoffspring,”astheprecedingv.16notes).Sinai,hesays,“doesnotannulacovenantpreviouslyratifiedbyGod,soastonullifythepromise”(Galatians3:17).ThetruegospelhebroughttothechurchesinGalatiaisatonewithandfulfillsitsancientbiblicalprecedent:
3:7Soyousee,thosewhobelievearethedescendantsofAbraham.8Andthescripture,foreseeingthatGodwouldjustifytheGentilesbyfaith,declaredthegospelbeforehandtoAbraham,saying,“AlltheGentilesshallbeblessedinyou”[seeGenesis12:3;18:18;22:18].9Forthisreason,thosewhobelieveareblessedwithAbrahamwhobelieved.
PassionateandstarkideasandlanguagemakeupPaul’srebuketothosewhorejectthetruthofhisdeclarationthatthose“baptizedintoChrist”nolongerstandinneedofthelaw’stutelageordiscipline,butare“free”(3:23–29,5:1–6),aresonsanddaughtersofAbraham,“heirsaccordingtothepromise,”andthereby“childrenofGodthroughfaith.”
WhenhedeploysaspartofhisapologiaaretellingofwhoSarahandIsaac,HagarandIshmaelare—theclearlessonsheseesintheirstory—Paulisaninterpreterofscriptureexcitedtomeethisimmediatechallenge.ThecrisisinthecongregationsinGalatiadictatesateverypointwhathechoosestohighlightinhisrepresentationofAbraham’swomenand
Page 5
Sarah and Hagar in Christian Retellings
Page 5 of 32
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofDenver; date: 27 October 2015
sons.PaulisimpelledtoadoptamodeofreadingthatreconstructstheSarah-Hagarstoryinotherthanliteralorhistoricalterms.
(p.158) Themodernreaderisstruck,nolessthantheancientwas,bytheemotionalandintellectualferocityinPaul’sallegoryandtheversessurroundingit.Radiatingfromtheselinesistheforceful,daring,andoftenoverstretchedreasoningthatisapolemicist’ssharpesttool:
4:22Tellme,youwhodesiretobesubjecttothelaw,willyounotlistentothelaw?ForitiswrittenthatAbrahamhadtwosons,onebyaslavewomanandtheotherbyafreewoman.23One,thechildoftheslave,wasbornaccordingtotheflesh(katasarka);theother,thechildofthefreewoman,wasbornthroughthepromise(di’epaggelias).24Nowthisisanallegory:thesewomenaretwocovenants.Onewoman,infact,isHagarfromMountSinai,bearingchildrenforslavery.25NowHagarisMountSinaiinArabiaandcorrespondstothepresentJerusalem,forsheisinslaverywithherchildren.26ButtheotherwomancorrespondstotheJerusalemabove;sheisfreeandsheisourmother.27Foritiswritten,
“Rejoice,youchildlessone,you
whobearnochildren,
burstintosongandshout,you
whoendurenobirthpangs;
forthechildrenofthedesolate
womanaremorenumerous
thanthechildrenoftheone
whoismarried”[Isaiah54:1LXX].
28Nowyou,myfriends,arechildrenofthepromise,likeIsaac.
29Butjustasatthattimethechildwhowasbornaccordingtotheflesh(katasarka)persecutedtheonebornaccordingtothespirit(katapneuma),soitisnowalso.30Butwhatdoesthescripturesay?
“Driveouttheslaveandherchild;forthechildoftheslavewillnotsharetheinheritancewiththechildofthefreewoman”[quotingPsalms21:10LXX,towhichPaulhasaddedthefinalphrase,“ofthefreewoman”].31Sothen,friends,wearechildrennotoftheslavebutofthefreewoman.
Acloselydetailedexplorationofthispassageandscholarlydebatessurroundingitisnotpossiblehere.ForourpurposesitwillsufficesimplytounderlinePaul’smajorassertions—andtoseeinthemadistinctivepieceofbiblicalinterpretation.
Page 6
Sarah and Hagar in Christian Retellings
Page 6 of 32
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofDenver; date: 27 October 2015
Thepassage’sopeningmodeofrhetoricmaybeclassifiedasdiatribe—apseudodialogueinwhichthespeakerchallengestheopponentandthenprovides,controls,ormuteshisresponses.HencethechallengingridiculeinPaul’sinvitation:Soyouwanttocleavetothelaw.Thenletusexamine(whichistosay:letmelayoutforyouinunmistakableterms)whatthe(p.159) lawsays.7ItisnotthebodyoflawsnoranyparticularlawintheTorahthatPaulthentakesup,butratherwhatscriptureteachesinanarrative—thatofAbraham’swomenandsons.Heisintentuponmakingelementsinthestory“standfor”andspeaktothecontroversyathand—oneinwhichhearguesfortheGalatianbelievers’salvation“inthegraceofChrist,”rebuttinghisopponents’teachings,which“perverttheGospelofChrist”(Galatians1:7).
ThedisputeoverthetwodefinitionsofbeingChristianbeingadvocatedinthechurchesofGalatiaistheenginethatdrivesPaul’ssearchingoutofcontrastsbetweenthetwowomen,eachwithherson,andwhattheysignify.Opposedare(1)asonmarkedbyslaveryand“flesh”versusafreebornsonwhosebirthfulfilledadivinepromise;(2)twowomen(who“are”twocovenants),onelinkedwithSinaiandtheJerusalemofPaul’stime,whosechildrenareenslaved,versustheotherwho“correspondstotheJerusalemabove,”shewhoisfreeand“ourmother.”Protectingthedivinetruthhe“received…througharevelationofJesusChrist”(Galatians1:11–12),Paul’sallegorydiscovers(orinvents)contraries,andthensharpensthem.Comparedtowhatwehaveseeninrabbinicalinterpretations,andevenviewedonitsowntermsasanargumentadvancedbyabiblicallyinformedJewofthefirstcentury,themoststartlingelementinPaul’streatmentofAbraham’ssonsandwomeninvv.24–26iswhatbecomesofHagar.ShesignifiesMountSinai—thatis,theLawgiventotheHebrewsthereintheageofMoses.(Paul’ssupportofthiscuriousattributionconsistsinhisreportthatSinaiisinArabia,thelandwithwhichheassociatesher,andinhisfurtherstrictidentificationofthetwo:HagarequalsMountSinai.ThislatterconstructionissoperplexinganduntenableasaclaimissuingfromeitherhistoryorlegendthatwesuspectthatPaulissimplyrestating,bycompression,histrope.Hagar,orMountSinai,“bear[s]childrenforslavery”[24.b].Thephraseisnotsoambiguousasitissuggestive,andintwodirections:itplaysonHagar’sstatusasSarah’sservant—seeingherprogenyalsoas“slaves,“anditpointstoconditionsoflife“underthelaw,”inbondagetothatcovenant—thatis,lifethatdoesnotpartakeintheliberationwonforGalatianconverts.Inchoosingtobecircumcised,the“foolish”inthosechurchesarechoosingtobe“cut…offfromChrist,”who“hasset[them]free”(Galatians5:4;5:1).
ThehaplessHagar“correspondstothepresentJerusalem,forsheisinslaverywithherchildren”(25b).EnslavedJerusalemisametonymforJudaism—thepanoplyofitsbeliefsanditspractices(andnot,itseems,anallusiontoIsrael’spastandpresentconditionsofbeinginvadedandgovernedbyforeignrulers).TheTorahcovenantis,asPaularguesatvariouspointsinhisletter,“slaveryunderthelaw”(seeGalatians3:22–25,(p.160) 28;4:1–10;5:1).ThedescriptionofJerusalemandherpeopleas“inslavery”constitutesoneofPaul’sstrongestassaultsontheJudaiclawanditsobservers.Hedisparagesinasinglephrasepreciselythatrevelation,vision,andcommunitytowhichhehad,untilrecently,beenfullycommitted.
Page 7
Sarah and Hagar in Christian Retellings
Page 7 of 32
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofDenver; date: 27 October 2015
Paul’sinterpretationisstunninglycontrary.Hagar,whointhescriptureisnofriendto,andcertainlynowillingparticipantin,thedivineplanmakingIsaacandhisprogenyinheritorsofthelandpromisedbyGod,ishereidentifiedbyPaulwiththatpeopleoftheoldcovenant.Herslavestatusqualifieshertorepresent,orrather,tobeJerusalem,Judaism,anditslaw,anditrendershertheforemotherofthoseheldinthrall—Jews,andbyextension,Gentileconvertswhoresorttocircumcision.ThisradicalalterationintheidentityandvalueofHagar,strangeandunprecedentedasitis,workstoPaul’sadvantageasacontroversialist,andhasitsjustificationinthat.
Sarah,bycontrast,Pauldivorcesfromassociationwiththelaworwithanyservitude“underit.”Sheisfree,andtheJerusalemshe“correspondsto”istheheavenly,notearthly,one—theholyandtranscendentcity“above”—theimaginedfinalhomeoftheblessed.8
Sarahdidnotproduceherson“naturally”(whichisoneconnotation,forPaul,of“accordingtotheflesh”),but“throughthepromise,”andthroughitsmiraculousanddivinefulfillment.PaulwantsnoonetobeuncertainabouttheapplicationofhisallegorytothemattersathandinGalatia:“you,myfriends,arechildrenofthepromise,likeIsaac.”ThoseadheringtothegospelPaulpresentedareheirsbornofsupernatural“promise”intothe“freedom”ofsalvation,whotravel,liketheirforefather,towardthesuperiorJerusalem:“AndifyoubelongtoChrist,thenyouareAbraham’soffspring,heirsaccordingtothepromise”(5:29).
Ontheotherside,Hagar,thepresentJerusalemwhosechildrenareinbondage,thelifeaccordingtothefleshwhichshebegets,and“doingworksofthelaw”(3:5)allstandforandidentifypeopleoutsidethesavingcovenant,unredeemedbyGod.
Inverses29through30PauloffersananalogythatseekstomakeparallelthecircumstancesofIsaac,ofPaul,andofthosefollowersofJesuswhosidewithhim.AwareofthetraditionwemetinGenesisRabbahthatIshmael“persecuted”Isaac,Paulsuggeststhathisgospelanditsadherentsarelikewisesubjectedtothreatandhostilityin“playing”withhim.PaulprobablyrefersbothtowhatheregardsasthetormenthesuffersfromthoseJudaizingtroublersofGentileconvertsofGalatiaandalsootherreportedrun-insheandhisdevoteeshadexperiencedatthehandsofJewishfoesof(p.161) histeaching(cf.1Thessalonians2:15–16).9Inthefaceofsuchconflicts,heseesnootherrecourseexceptthatactionthatwasoriginallytaken(Genesis21:10):throwouttheslaveandherson,anddenytothemtheinheritancethatbelongsto“thechildofthefreewoman.”Paulisencouragingthoughtsofexpellingtheadvocatesofcircumcisionwhotroublethechurchesthere,onthegroundsthattheyhavenorighttothepromisesGodhasmadeavailableinChrist,buthesettlesforanotherdivisionorpolaritywhichhehopeswillsolidifyandencouragehisallies:“Sothen,friends,we[unlikeouropponentsinGalatiaandthe‘fools’whoheedtheirteaching]arechildren,notoftheslave,butofthefreewoman.”Inotherwords,thosewhostandwithhimandhisteachingaretheonessavedbyGod,whilehisopponentshavetakenuponthemselvesoncemoretheslaveryfromwhichtheywerereleasedbyChrist’ssacrificialdeathandhisresurrection.
Page 8
Sarah and Hagar in Christian Retellings
Page 8 of 32
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofDenver; date: 27 October 2015
Again,thepointanddirectionofPaul’sallegoricalcontrast,thistimefocusedonthe“freewoman,”canbegivenbluntsummarization:“Sarah=heavenlyJerusalem=Christianity,”asHansDieterBetzputitinaformula.10Thelineageofthe“family”enjoyingGod’sparticularfavornowruns,atleastasPaulpresentsthecasehere,fromAbraham,Sarah,andIsaactotheirchildreninthechurcheshehascalledintobeing.Paul’szealforhisgospeltotheGentiles,ferventlyarticulatedinhisbattleagainstthe“circumcisionparty,”drivesawedgebetweenthenewrevelationtowhichhetestifies,ontheonehand,andJudaism,oranyconfidencepeoplemightputintheMosaiccovenantandtherewardsoftheirfaithfuladherencetoit.Israel’smatriarchandherson,“bornaccordingtothespirit”and“accordingtothepromise”are,inPaul’sviewofthehistoryofsalvation,coguarantors,withAbraham,ofthedivinepledgenowgiventothosewhowillsoonbeknownas“Christians”(Acts11:26).
Romans4:11–12,18–21;9:2–13
Bynomeansadiatribe,PaulwroteRomans(ca.58CE)withobjectivesdifferentfromthoseinhislettertotheGalatians,andinanothermode—oneappropriatetotheaddresseesandtopresentcircumstances.
Abrahamisthemodelfor“aperson[who]isjustifiedbyfaithapartfromtheworksofthelaw”(Romans3:28),butPaul’sinterpretationofhimisaltered.Adifferentaudiencerequiresadifferentandparticularapproach.Here,whenPaulturnstoAbraham’sstory,hisemphasisisshapedbyhisknowledgethatbothJewsandpolytheists/GentilesmakeupthechosencommunitythatwillgreethiminRome.Weseethisinatopichetakesupwithcare:thebiblical(p.162) testimonythatAbrahamwascircumcised—butcircumcisedafterhishavingbeenfoundrighteousonthebasisofhisbeliefinGod:
4:11Hereceivedthesignofcircumcisionasasealoftherighteousnessthathehadbyfaithwhilehewasstilluncircumcised.Thepurposewastomakehimtheancestorofallwhobelievewithoutbeingcircumcisedandwhothushaverighteousnessreckonedtothem,12andlikewisetheancestorofthecircumcisedwhoarenotonlycircumcisedbutwhoalsofollowtheexampleofthefaiththatourancestorhadbeforehewascircumcised.
InthislineofargumentPauldoesnotatallhaveinmindthecircumcision-temptedGentileconvertsinGalatianchurches.Rather,inhis“longingtosee”membersoftheRomanchurches,heaspiresto“share…somespiritualgifttostrengthen[them]”(1:11).Oneofhischiefgoalsinwritinghisletteristocreateroomandcomplementarity,onbiblicalandtheologicalgrounds,forGentileandJewishbelieversinJesus’smessiahship.InpursuitofthisgoalheamplifieshisteachingaboutwhatAbraham’scircumcisionsignifies.Paulspellsoutthemeaningofthepatriarch’scircumcisionintermsdirectlypertinenttothoseheaddresses:JewswhonowcallJesus“lord,”andcountthemselvesmembersof“thebodyofChrist”—thatis,congregationmembers—mustcountassecondarytheircircumcisionsandtheiradherencetoJewishlaw,eventhoughthosecovenantloyaltiespredatetheiradoptionofnewbeliefandfunctionasholy“tradition”forthem.Whatisprimaryandessential—namely,“therighteousnessofGodthroughfaithin
Page 9
Sarah and Hagar in Christian Retellings
Page 9 of 32
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofDenver; date: 27 October 2015
JesusChristforallwhobelieve”(3:22)—standsasthekeyandsavingdatum.Theirloyaltyto,andobservanceof,thelaw,followsuponthisand,ineffect,servesonlytoconfirmit:“[Abraham]receivedthesignofcircumcisionasasealoftherighteousnessthathehadbyfaithwhilehewasstilluncircumcised”(4:11).
OnlytworeferencestoSarahoccurinRomans.Hagargoesunmentioned—anintriguingomissiontobeexaminedabitlater.In4:19Sarah’snameappearsaspartofPaul’stestimonytothesteadfasttrustAbrahamhadinGod’spledgetohimthatheandhisoffspringwould“inherittheworld”(4:13).PaulrecapitulatesapartoftheGenesissagathathethinksveryhelpfultohisletter’spurposes:
4:18Hopingagainsthope,hebelievedthathewouldbecome“thefatherofmanynations,”accordingtowhatwassaid,“Sonumerousshallyourdescendantsbe”[seeGenesis17:5and15:5].19Hedidnotweakeninfaithwhenheconsideredhisownbody,whichwasalreadyasgoodasdead(forhewasaboutahundredyearsold),orwhenheconsideredthebarrennessofSarah’swomb.20NodistrustmadehimwaverconcerningthepromiseofGod,buthegrewstronginhisfaith(p.163)ashegaveglorytoGod,21beingfullyconvincedthatGodwasabletodowhathehadpromised.Thereforehisfaith“wasreckonedtohimasrighteousness.”
PaulpresentsSarah’sbarrennessasadescriptive“fact”which,takenalongsideAbraham’soldageandimpotency,onlymakesherhusband’shopemoreadmirable.TheGreekregularlyrendered“barrenness”is,moreliterally,aphraseaboutthenekrosis(thedeadnessorthenecroticstate)ofherwomb,anditismeanttoechoPaul’suseofthesameword-rootincallingAbraham’sbody“asgoodasdead.”Inthis“note”aboutSarahwesurmisethatPaulwasawareofthediscussionsinrabbiniccirclesaboutwhetherSarahwasinfertile(e.g.,GenesisRabbahXLV,above,pp.129-131)andhadtakenapositiononthequestion.GenesisitselfreportsonlythatatthetimeofGod’spromiseofasontobenamedIsaac,Abrahamwondered(havingfallentotheground,laughing)whetherthiscouldhappenwhenhewasahundredyearsold,andSarahwasninety(17:17).ThoughPaulisworkingimaginativelyandwiththeologicalintent,hismentionofSarahin4:19doesnotinterpretherinthesymbolicorallegoricalmode.DrawinguponatraditionstemmingfromexegesisoftheTorah,andusingitasa“historical”datum,hepresentsSarahsimplyasawomanincapableofpregnancyandchildbirth,importantinsofarasherconditionunderlinesthestrengthofAbraham’sfaith,andthewondrousnatureofGod’spowerinmakingtheonehecalledforthfromUr“thefatherofmanynations.”
ThoughSarahappearsinRomans9:9onlyinaquotationofGenesis,sheistheremorerichlyinterpreted(thanin4:19)simplybyvirtueofthepassage’splaceinthemidstofPaulineruminationsaboutGod’spromise.Thesurroundingideasarequitefamiliarfromwhatwemetintheallegory(oratleastinhalfofit)inGalatians4.The“promise”isassociatedwiththe(new)covenant,withSarah’sson,andwiththe“Zion”tobeenteredwhenthe“day”ofjudgmentarrives,usheringinthatsalvationthatPaulclaimsis“nearertousnowthanwhenwebecamebelievers”(13:11).
Page 10
Sarah and Hagar in Christian Retellings
Page 10 of 32
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofDenver; date: 27 October 2015
ThehardandpainfulquestionatissueforPaul:WillIsrael,theelectofGod,beamongtheredeemed?
9:2Ihavegreatsorrowandunceasinganguishinmyheart.
3ForIwishthatImyselfwereaccursedandcutofffromChristforthesakeofmyownpeople,mykindredaccordingtotheflesh.
4TheyareIsraelites,andtothembelongtheadoption,theglory,thecovenants,thegivingofthelaw,theworship,andthepromises;
5tothembelongthepatriarchs,andfromthem,accordingtotheflesh,comestheMessiah,whoisoverall,Godblessedforever.Amen.6ItisnotasthoughthewordofGodhasfailed.FornotallIsraelitestrulybelongtoIsrael,7andnot(p.164) allofAbraham’schildrenarehistruedescendants;but“ItisthroughIsaacthatdescendantsshallbenamedforyou”(Genesis21:12).8ThismeansthatitisnotthechildrenofthefleshwhoarechildrenofGod,butthechildrenofthepromisearecountedasdescendants.9Forthisiswhatthepromisesaid,“AboutthistimeIwillreturnandSarahshallhaveason”(Genesis18:10,14).10Noristhatall;somethingsimilarhappenedtoRebeccawhenshehadconceivedchildrenbyonehusband,ourancestorIsaac.11Evenbeforetheyhadbeenbornorhaddoneanythinggoodorbad(sothatGod’spurposeofelectionmightcontinue,12notbyworksbutbyhiscall)shewastold,“Theeldershallservetheyounger”(Genesis25:23).13Asitiswritten,“IhavelovedJacob,butIhavehatedEsau”(Malachi1:2b–3a).
Theselines,deployingpassagesofscriptureas“prooftexts”andargument-builders,aremovingtowardPaul’suncompromisingdeclarationin9:31–32that“Israel,whodidstrivefor[righteousness]thatisbasedonthelaw,didnotsucceedinfulfillingthatlaw,”andtherebytrippedonthestoneGodplacedinZionto“makepeoplestumble,”andtheyfell—thatis,erred.Buthere,in9:2–13,PaulputshiswishfortheJews’conversiontobeliefindramaticpersonalterms,andacknowledgesthehallowedgloriesconstitutiveofIsrael’ssacredhistory.Thereisareserveclauseeveninthisrecital,however,forbyrepeatingthephrase“accordingtotheflesh,”hemaintains(thoughlessabrasivelythanhisformulationintheGalatiansallegorydid)thestatus,overagainsttheethnicandgeneticrealityofbeingIsraelites,ofthosewhoarenow,sinceChrist’scoming,God’struesonsanddaughters“accordingtothespirit”or“thepromise.”
SarahdoesherdutyinthecitationofGenesis18:10,14–15;sheisthemotherofthechildwhofulfillsGod’spromise,aninstrumentintheplanofsalvationforallofAbraham’ssonsanddaughtersinthegenerationsstemmingfromIsaac.TheotherchildrenofAbrahamarenotincluded;IshmaelandhisposteritymustbemostprominentlyinPaul’smind.ButthatisnotthedistinctionPaulismostanxioustomakeatthispointinhismessagetoRomanbelievers.Rather,heiskeentocommunicatehisinsight,thefruitoftherevelationhereceived,thatthoseareofIsaac’sseedwhoarechildrenofthepromise.“Childrenoftheflesh,”ontheotherhand,arenot“countedasdescendants”
Page 11
Sarah and Hagar in Christian Retellings
Page 11 of 32
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofDenver; date: 27 October 2015
andarenot“childrenofGod”(v.8).God’sfavorandparenthoodhingenotongenetics,butonGod’spromiseasitisgivenandreceived.Paul’schosenterm,“promise”(eppangelia),isastand-infor“covenant”(diatheke),whichhedoesnotwanttoemploy;heisintentuponmaintainingthedifference,centraltohisunderstandingofGodandsalvation,betweenGod’scompactwithAbrahamandhislatercovenantwithMoses,articulatedinthelaw.11OnlythosebelongtotheseedofAbrahamand“countasdescendants”whohavecometoknowGod’spromise,and(p.165) haveresponded—thatis,respondedbyfaithandinbelieving,notbyundertakingdeedsmeanttocomplywithandsatisfythelaw’sdemands.ByPaulnowredefinedandreconfiguredaspeople“born”accordingtothepromise,orspiritually,thedescendantsandheirsofIsaachaveincommonnotsimplytheiractofbelieving(asopposedtoeffortsatlaw-obedience),butanecessarilycontent-specificconviction:thattheJewaccordingtotheflesh,Jesus,whowascrucifiedandraisedup,isnoneotherthanGod’s“messiah,whoisoverall.”
CounterposingtheelectionofIsrael“accordingtotheflesh,”withwhichhebeganthepassage,totheelectionofthosewho,inacceptingJesusasGod’smessiah,arechildrenof“thepromise,”PaulinterpretsSarahashehadintheallegoryofhisearlierletter:sheandhersonIsaac,withAbraham,arethetrue—thatis,thespiritual—forebearsofJewsandGentileswhohearandbelieveinthegospelthathe,theapostle,preaches.
Paulinsertsanadditionalinterpretivetwistin9:10–13byseekingenforcementforhisclaimsintheprocreativehistoryofIsaac.God’s“promise”orelectionwasatworkinthecaseofthesonsRebeccaborehim,forGod’sworddeclaredthatthefirstofthetwinstobebornwouldservethesecond-born.FromthepropheticbookMalachiPaulprovidesanothersupportivedivinedeclaration,thisoneaboutGod’slove(orfavor,orchoice)ofJacob,andhishatred(ordisfavor,orpassingover)ofEsau.PaulischampioningGod’sfreedomtoact,andtopreferandelectparticularpersonsandpeoplesforhiscareandprotection,“evenbeforetheyhadbeenbornorhaddoneanythinggoodorbad”(9:11).Covenantsaregiven,orenacted,Paulagaininsists,bydivineinitiative,anddonotoriginatein,norcontinueby,the“logic”ormechanicsofhumandeeds—thatis,by“works”thatareassumedtoearnGod’sattentionandeffectreconciliationwithhim.
ApieceofunfinishedbusinesslingersattheendofourtreatmentofPaulonAbraham’swomen.WhyisHagar,soserviceableinhislettertotheGalatianchurches,absentfromhisEpistletotheRomans?WhydidhechoosetoexcludefromthepresentationofthegospelmessagehewasforecastingtotheRomanChristianshischaracterizationofHagarinGalatians4as“fromMountSinai,bearingchildrenforslavery….correspond[ing]tothepresentJerusalem”?Wehaveseenthattheheatofhisearlierassaulton“Judaizers”ofGentileconvertsinspiredhisstrained,evenbizarre,connectionofthewomanandsonexpelledbyAbrahamwithJudaismandtheLaw.Thisallegoricalassociationmadenorealsenseintermsofthehistoricallegendssurroundingher,andthereforesignaledtheexegete’sreachforaforcefulinterpretation,howevernovel.PaulworkedinGalatianstodistinguishthroughoppositionalimagesthefreedomwonforpeopleofthe“nations”fromwhathedepictsasthe“slavery”ofJudaism.
(p.166) IntheRomancommunityofbelievers,hehasamuchdifferentappealtomake.
Page 12
Sarah and Hagar in Christian Retellings
Page 12 of 32
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofDenver; date: 27 October 2015
TheassociationoffollowersofJesuswhounderstandthemselvesashavingbeencalledintoexistencebeforetheeschaton’sarrivalismadeupofJewsandGentiles.DissensionorconfusionisnotthepresentedreasonforPaul’swriting,asithadbeeninhiscorrespondencewiththechurchesinGalatia,Thessalonica,andCorinth.Together,andbyvirtueoftheircommonfaithinGod-sentJesustheChrist,thebelieversinRome,asPaulseems(orhopes)toseethem,makeupthenewpeopleofGod,enjoyingunity.Theyareonepeople“sinceGodisone;andhewilljustifythecircumcisedonthegroundoffaithandtheuncircumcisedthroughthatsamefaith”(3:31).InlanguagehewouldnothaveusedinaddressingturmoilafflictingtheGalatianchurches,headds:“Dowethenoverthrowthelawbythisfaith?Bynomeans,onthecontrary,weupholdthelaw.”PaulmeansthatheupholdsthelawforJewsasaconfirmation,asealing,ofthatrighteousnessgrantedtothem,onthebasisoftheirfaith,byGod.
ThisdifferenceinPaul’saudienceandthusinhisviewpoint,withitsemphasisonaninclusivegospel,dictatedthatPaulnotemploytheHagarhalfofhisSarah-Hagarallegory,forthoughhismakingherintoametaphorforJudaiclawwhichenslavesandforJerusaleminbondagespoketothecontroversyinGalatia,thatargumentcouldonlyunderminehisefforttoassureRomanChristiansof“thecontinuingvalidityofIsraelinGod’spurpose.”12
Paul’sinsistencethatbelieversinJesusenjoyedaconvenantwithGodthatsupersededtheformerwasdestinedtostirdeepcontentionandanimosityinallsubsequenthistoricalseasonsofinteractionsbetweenJewsandChristians.Tobehistoricallyconsciousandconscientious,weareobligedtoseethislineofreasoning—thatis,thatmembersofchurcheswerethecovenantpeople,havingtakentheplaceoftheJewswhorejectedGod’smessiah—inthecontextwhichpromptedhimtowritehislettertotheJesus-followersinRome.HisconfidentvisionofGod’smostrecentactionsisthatofafirst-centuryJewwhowascompelled(miraculously,byhisownaccount)tobelieveinJesusasGod’sagentofsalvation—theredeemerofPaulhimself,ofallthenations,andofthoseJewswhowouldhonorJesusastheir“lord.”
PaultheapostleofChristdidinfactuseSarahandHagar“tothinkwith,”presentingbothwomenasrepresentativeofsomethingotherthan“femalecharactersintheirownright,”asGenesismightbesaidtoportraythem.Paul’sallusions—andadjustments—toAbraham’swomen,especiallyinhisaggravatedlettertothechurchesinGalatia,symbolizethemasfiguresforspiritualpromise,inthecaseofSarah,andofenslavementandexclusionfromGod’ssavingcovenant,inthecaseofHagar.
(p.167) WillwefindsignificantdifferencesinthewayoneofearlyChristianity’smoststellarscripturescholars(andadeepadmirerofPaul)retellsthestoryofAbraham’shousehold,andtheconflictbetweenhistwowives?
Origen’sGenesisHomilyVII:OntheBirthofIsaacandtheFactthatHeIsWeanedBythetime,around240,thatOrigen(ca.185–254)wasregularlypreachingtoacongregationintheportcityHerodhadbuilt,CaesareaMaritima,hewasamanof
Page 13
Sarah and Hagar in Christian Retellings
Page 13 of 32
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofDenver; date: 27 October 2015
significantandwidespreadreputation.13Reportsofhislifecirculatedandgrewafterhisdeath,asweknowfromabiographicalsketchinEusebius’sEcclesiasticalHistory,writtenbeforethemid-fourthcentury,andfromnoticespennedbyotherChristianwriters.HewasrememberedasaboyinAlexandriawhosefather’smartyrdominspiredinhimadesireforthesamefate.HiszealfortheChristianlife(increasinglyimaginedbysomeinhiscirclesinasceticterms)ledtohischoiceasayoungmantobecome,throughcastration,a“eunuchforthekingdomofheaven”—thatis,apersonendeavoringtoguardagainsttheluresanddistractionsofsexualappetites.TheadmirationandauthorityhegainedasaChristianrhetor-philosopherandcatechistinAlexandriawasafactorinawranglewithhisbishop,Demetrius,andeventuallyledtohisrelocationfromEgypttoCaesareaMaritimainPalestine.Therehewasordainedapresbyterandspentthelasttwodecadesofhiscareer,havingamonghisdutiesregularpreachingtoaChristiancongregationinthe“liturgyoftheword”whichprecededthecommunionmeal.Fortunatelyforus,afteratimeheallowedstenographerstorecordhissermons.
Whatfollowsisanexperiment—acasestudyinOrigen’sapproachtoreadingscriptureasobservedinasinglebriefsermon,onedevotedtoourstory.Inthetracking,point-by-point,ofhishomily’slineofreasoningandthestrategiesitemploys,wehaveintereststhathavealreadybeenidentified.HowdohisexegeticalinterestsinSarahandHagarcomparewiththoseofPaul?InwhatwaysdoesOrigendistinguishbetweenandmanipulatethekindsofmeaningthatcenterontheGenesistext’sstorylineinitsliteralsense,ontheonehand,andthosethataresymbolicormetaphorical,ontheother?Inwhatcomestoexpressionaspreachedscripturalcommentarymadeaccessibleforagroupoflisteners,doeshisconcernforthesymbolicmeaningsoverwhelmorabandonthetext’shistoricallevelofmeaning?Andwehavethelargerquestionofthischapterinview:isitthecasethatOrigen’spenchantforunderliningspiritualmeaningsinasacredstoryresultsinadistinguishableearlyChristianretellingofthe(p.168) story—whencomparedwiththeinterpretivestrategiesofrabbinicandMuslimcommentators?
Origen’sthree-yearcycleofsermonsdevotedtotextsoftheOldTestamentincludedhishomilydevotedtoGenesis21:1–21,thescriptureportionrecountingtheeventsfromIsaac’sbirthtothetrialinthewildernesssufferedbyHagarandherson.Itsmostaccurateandsuccincttitlewouldbe,asabiblicalscholarlabeledthisportionofGenesis,“Isaac’sbirth,Ishmael’sExpulsion.”14
AboutOrigen’spresuppositionsinapproachingbiblicalinterpretationweneedstillmoreintroduction.God’swisdomfillsscriptureandsupportsbelieversinaccordancewiththeircurrentcapacitiestounderstand.Thereisguidance—andsalvation—forthosewhoreadorhearthetext“plainly,”initsexplicitlanguage.MoreprofoundcomprehensionofGod’swisdomawaitsthosewhogrowintheirabilitiestoconsidertheBible’srevelationswithincreasingcareanddiscernment.ThosemessageswhichinvitestudentsofscriptureclosesttothemysteryofGod’sgoodnessandhelparenotobvious.Eventhesilencesinscripturearepregnant.WhenwaxingtheoreticalaboutthisinhisOnFirstPrinciples,hewrote:
Page 14
Sarah and Hagar in Christian Retellings
Page 14 of 32
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofDenver; date: 27 October 2015
Onemustportraythemeaningofthesacredwritingsinathreefoldwayuponone’sownsoul,sothatthesimplemanmaybeedifiedbywhatwemaycallthefleshofthescripture,thisnamebeinggiventotheobviousinterpretation;whilethemanwhohasmadesomeprogressmaybeedifiedbyitssoul,asitwere;andthemanwhoisperfectandlikethosementionedbytheapostle:“Wespeakwisdomamongtheperfect....”—thismanmaybeedifiedbythespirituallaw,whichhas“ashadowofthegoodthingstocome.”Forjustasmanconsistsofbody,soul,andspirit,sointhesamewaydoesthescripture,whichhasbeenpreparedbyGodtobegivenforman’ssalvation.15
SucharesomeofthekeyassumptionsinformingOrigen’swritingsandthoseofhisoralteachingsthatsurvive.Hisadviceisplain:ifyouintendtobeaChristian,bepreparedtofollowJesus’sprecept,“Searchthescriptures”(John5:39).Bepreparedalsotobechangedfromachildtoanadult,fromapersonwhosemodeofperceptioniscarnaltoonewhothinksandseesinawaythatisspiritual—whoprayerfullyreadswitheyesopenedandupturned.
Inthissermon,Origenregularlyandfirmlydeclarestherulesofthegameinencounteringscripture.Hewarns.Heteases.Hegoadsthecongregation:Areyoucontentwiththescripture’smostobviousandliteralsense?Areyouuptothechallengeofdiggingforsignificantmeaningswhenyouencounterinthebiblicalnarrativeelementsthatstrikeyouasunedifyingorillogical?
(p.169) YouwillnothearwhatGodistellingyouinthisstoryofAbraham’sfamily,Origenregularlyasserts,unlessyoupressforitsdeepestmeanings,whichcontaintruthsrelatingtoyouinyourownexistence.AbiblicalnarrativedoesnotrevealGodinitsancientstorynessalone,saysthepreacher:inandthroughscriptureyouarebeingaddressed—summonedintoyourfull,maturefaithandbeckonedtowardyourLord.
Origen’shomilycommencesnotwithareferencetoanopeningverseintheday’stext,Genesis21,butwithaprayerthatalludestoPaul’steachingabouthowbelieversare(andarenot)toreadandhearscripture:
Mosesisreadtousinchurch.Letuspray[to]theLordlest,inaccordancewiththeApostle’sword,evenwithus,“whenMosesisreadtheveilbeupon”our“heart.”16
Origennodoubthopedthatsomeinthecongregation,hearinghisinvocation,wouldrecallthecontentof2Corinthians3:12–18,inwhichPaulmakestheveilthatMoseswearsinExodus34intoametaphorforIsrael’scurrentblindnessto“theLord.”ImploringboththeLordandthemembersofhischurchthatthisJewishveilormisunderstandingnotobscure“eventous”thetextandthesermon,thepreacherisaskingforaparticularlyChristianencounterwithMoses—thatis,withthisday’sscripturalmessagefromGod.Origen’sprefatoryprayerbaldlyidentifiesawrongwaytohearandcomprehendscripture,andwarnsagainstthatmisguidedwayofinterpreting,andthepeoplewhopracticeit.Itremindshiscongregantsimmediatelyofwhotheyareasan
Page 15
Sarah and Hagar in Christian Retellings
Page 15 of 32
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofDenver; date: 27 October 2015
assembledgroup(incontradistinctionto“Israel”).
Significantalsoinhisopeningprayerandadmonitionisthatitrevealswhathebelievesaboutlevelsortiersthatareinvolvedinpursuitofmeaning—levelspresentbothinthesacredstoryitselfandinthoseinhisflockwhomightlearnandbeaffectedbyit.
TurningtoGenesis21,Origensummarizesitsopeningverses:Abraham,atahundredyearsold,conceivedIsaac;SarahwondersaloudwhowillinformAbrahamthatshenursesachild.Inapresumed“dialogue”withhisaudience,thepreacherpausesfirsttoconsiderwhatisstrikingin21:4:“AndthenAbrahamcircumcisedthechildontheeighthday.”OrigencommentsonthefactthatitisnotIsaac’sbirthdaythatiscelebratedwith“agreatfeast”(21:8),butthedayofhisweaning.
Why?DowethinkthatitistheHolySpirit’sintentiontowritestoriesandtonarratehowachildwasweanedandafeastwasmade,howheplayedanddidotherchildishthings?OrshouldweunderstandbythesethingsthathewishestoteachussomethingdivineandworthythatthehumanracemightlearnfromthewordsofGod?17
(p.170) Origencontinueshisexhortativetheme:letuslookandlistenforthenoblermeaningswhichtheHolySpirithasplacedinourscripture;todootherwiseistoremainchild-like,tobeawarechieflyofourbodilysenses,tolanguishinourcarnalstates,andworstofall,tomissthefeastawaitingtheweaned,thespiritual.
ProceedingtotheGenesispassage’snextcomment-worthyitem,Origenrecapitulatesthefewversesrecountingthe“play”ofIshmaelwithIsaac,Sarah’sanger(thisplayisa“disaster”(pernicium)toher)inspiresherdemandthat“thebondwoman”becastout,sothatIshmaelnotbecoinheritorwithIsaac.Thepreacherpostponesconsiderationoftheseverses(21:8–10)untilhecanconsultPaul,forhewantstoprobehismentor’sallegoryofthetwomothersandtheirsons.How,hewondersaloud,shouldwetaketheapostle’swordsinGalatians4:21–24,wherePaulgivescontrastingcharacterizationsofthetwosons—Ishmael“bornoftheflesh”andIsaacborn“bythepromise”?
Isitliterallytrue,Origenasks,thatIsaacwasnotbornnaturally—“accordingtotheflesh”?Wasn’thebornfromSarah,circumcisedintheflesh,anddidhenotplaywithIshmael“humanly”?WhatisPauldrivingat?Origenobservedthat“Hecalledthings‘allegorical’whichwerequiteobviouslydoneintheflesh.”
Hispurposeisthatwemightlearnhowtotreatotherpassages,andespeciallytheseinwhichthehistoricalnarrativeappearstorevealnothingworthyofthedivinelaw.18
SimultaneouslyendorsingandinterrogatingPaul’ssymbolicinterpretationofthepassage,Origenseizesthemomenttostateoneofhisinterpretiveprinciples:somebiblicalnarrativescontainnoimportantor“worthy”sense,whenreadintheliteral-historicalregisterofmeaning,andthese,therefore,begfurtherexamination.AsOrigenhad
Page 16
Sarah and Hagar in Christian Retellings
Page 16 of 32
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofDenver; date: 27 October 2015
writtensomefifteentotwentyyearsearlierabout“theinspirationofdivinescripture”:
Ourcontentionwithregardtothewholeofdivinescriptureisthatitallhasaspiritualmeaning,butnotallhasabodilymeaning....Consequentlythepersonwhoreadsthedivinebooksreverently,believingthemtobedivinewritings,mustexercisegreatcare.19
SensenexthastobemadeofPaul’sremarkthatasIshmael“persecutedhimwhowasaccordingtothespirit,soalsoitisnow”(Galatians4:17).Origenarguesthattheapostle’spointwas“thatinallthingsthefleshisopposedtothespirit.”Hewantstomovehishearerstoconsidertheseveralformsthisoppositionmighttake,andhowclosetotheirown(p.171) life-situationspersecutioncomes“now.”Itispossible,hedeclares,toimaginepersecutionsincasesinvolvingtwoquitedifferentpeoplesornations,onecarnalandtheotherspiritual.(Tothistypeofconflicthewillreturn.)Butwithinourowncommunity,hesays,onefindsoppositionbetweenmembers—somewhoareflesh-boundagainstsomewhoarespiritual.Persecutionandhostilitybetweenthebrothers,Abraham’ssons,is,uponmorethoughtfulscrutiny,notsimplyinthepastbutinourpresentand,indeed,amongandwithinus:
Forevenyou,ifyoulive“accordingtotheflesh,”areasonofHagarandforthisreasonareopposedtothesewholive“accordingtothespirit.”Orevenifweinquireinourselves,wefindthat“thefleshlustsagainstthespiritandthespiritagainstthefleshandthesearecontrarytooneanother”(cf.Galatians5:17)....Doyouseehowgreatthebattlesofthefleshagainstthespiritare?20
InsuggestingthathishearerscanbeIshmael,Origenisnotspeaking,likePaul,tofirst-centuryGalatianJesus-followersconflictedovertheplaceofJewishobservanceintheirpersonalandcommunallife.Rather,hisaudienceconsistsofthird-centuryChristiansconsciousofwhotheyare—onegroupwithinareligiouslydiversepopulaceinaseaportcity.HehasbeentransposingPaul’s“Jewish”Ishmael—carnalandthusenslaved—intoacategoryapplicabletohisChristianhearersandthetestsandtemptationsmetintheirmoralandspirituallives.
However,whenhenextreferstoastillmoredifficultbattlethantheoneshehasjustidentified—namelyagainstthose“whounderstandthelaw‘accordingtotheflesh’”—hisaudienceknowsthatheistargetingtheJewishcommunityanditsleaders—peopleforwhom,asOrigenseesthings,“spiritualdiscernment”isoutofreach.Hisanti-Jewishcriticism,Pauline,butnowOrigen’sown,surfacesagainatthispoint,butnotforthelasttimeinhissermon.
Thepreachertrainshiseyeonceagainonhisownlisteners,andpreparesthemtotakeonanothernameandabetteridentity.Inaseriesofconditionalphrases(“ifyouhaveinyourself,”“Ifonlyyoucansay,”“ifyoucanbesuch”)hereiteratesthechallengethattheday’sreadingposes:asinyourcarnalityyoucanbeIshmael,being“jointheirswithhimwhowas‘bornaccordingtotheflesh,’sotooyoucanbeIsaac”—“heirsindeedofGod,andjointheirswithChrist”(Romans8:17).TowhichofAbraham’ssonsdoyouwishtobe
Page 17
Sarah and Hagar in Christian Retellings
Page 17 of 32
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofDenver; date: 27 October 2015
related?Ifitistothesonof“thepromise,”willyouactresolutelyuponthischoiceofyours?IsaacandIshmael,spokenofasdifferently“born,”havebeenmadesubjectsfortropological,ormoral,exegesis.ThehearersaretochoosebetweenthetwolivesthatAbraham’ssonsrepresent.
(p.172) Anotherunexpectedandunexplaineditemintheday’sreadingcatchesthepreacher’sattention.Asilenceinthetextraisesquestions.Whatcouldpossiblyhavebeeninvolvedinthe“playing”ofthetwoboysthatsoangeredSarah,causinghertodemandexpulsionofthe“sonofthebondwoman”?“CertainlynopersecutionofIshmaelagainstIsaacisrelatedtohavebeenundertaken,exceptthisplayoftheinfantalone.”21OrigenattributestoPaulanexplanationthatrecastsandidealizesSarah,andaccordinglyframestheimaginedinteractionsoftheboysatplay.Iftheflesh,orcarnality,whichIshmaelstandsfor,“attractsthespirit,whichisIsaac,anddealswithhimwithenticingdeceitfulness,[and]ifitallureshimwithdelights....thiskindofplayofthefleshwiththespiritoffendsSarahespecially,whoisvirtue.”22
HavingmadethecauseofSarah’sangerattheboys’playingintoalessonmeanttogiveethicalguidance,OrigencannowaskhishearerstoconsiderIshmael-likepersecutionstheythemselveshavesuffered—orcommitted.Heisprovocativelyconversational.
You,therefore,Ohearerofthesewords,donotsupposethatthataloneispersecutionwheneveryouarecompelledbythemadnessofthepaganstosacrificetoidols.Butifperhapsthepleasureofthefleshalluresyou,iftheallurementoflustsportswithyou,fleethesethingsasthegreatestpersecutionifyouareasonofvirtue.Indeed,forthisreasontheApostlealsosays:“Fleefornication[1Corinthians6:18].”Butalsoifinjusticeshouldattractyou,sothat,accepting“thecountenanceofthemighty[Cf.Leviticus19:15],”andbecauseofhisartfultwistingyourenderanunjustjudgment,yououghttounderstandthatundertheguiseofplayyousufferaseductivepersecutionininjustice.Butyoushallalsoconsideritapersecutionofthespiritbyindividualguisesofevil,eveniftheyarepleasantanddelightfulandsimilartoplay,becauseinallthesevirtueisoffended.23
Genesis21:11–21describesthefortunesofIshmaelandHagar,andOrigen’sinterpretationmakesroomforanewsetofinsights—onestriggeredbydetailsandimagesinthestoryofthebanishedpair.WhilecontinuingtousePaul’sallegorizingtodevelopmoreofhisown,Origenintroducesathematiccounterpoint,onethat,asJohnThompsonobservedinhisWritingtheWrongs,renders“Hagartrulyenigmatic”—andnottheobjectofscornthattheApostlemadeherouttobe.24
AhintofthisispresentinOrigen’streatmentofGenesis11–13,whereAbrahamrequestsGod’sconsiderationforhisolderson,andreceivesdivinereassurance.OrigenatthispointthinksaboutAbraham’ssonsinawaythatqualifiesthestrictoppositionposedinGalatians4:22–29.HeispayingheedtowhattheGenesistextliterallyreports.Ishmaeldoesnotbecomehisfather’sheir,yet“hereceivesgiftsandisnotsentawayempty.”(p.173) WhileIsaacmayobtain“thepromise,”Ishmaelisgranteda“blessing.”Isaac“becomesthepeopleofadoption,”butIshmaelbecomes“agreatnation.”Thereis
Page 18
Sarah and Hagar in Christian Retellings
Page 18 of 32
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofDenver; date: 27 October 2015
spiritualsensetobemadeofthedifferentboonsgrantedtothesons,andthepreacherproceedstoidentifytwogroupswithintheChristianchurchwhohavebecomesonsof“Abraham”:thereare“some[who]clingtoGodonthebasisoflove,othersonthebasisofdreadandfearoffuturejudgment.”25TheformerwerebornofAbrahamand“thefreewoman,”whilethelatter(thetypesofthesonofthebondwoman)arelikeone“whokeepsthecommandmentsnotinperfectlove,but…infearofpunishment.”Dramatic,consistentwarningsaboutthefierytormentawaitingunbelievershadpromptedthepaganphilosopherCelsustoteasetheChristiansforthinkingoftheirGodasaperiodic“cook”(Origen,AgainstCelsus5:14)—andyearslaterOrigengivesevidencethattheconvictionofadreadfuljudgmentdayisoneinwhichmanyChristiansaredeeplyinvested.Herehecomparestwoformsoffaithfulness—oneenjoyedinthefreedomoflove,andtheother,aninferiortype,characterizedby“slavishfear.”Thecontrastissharp.Nevertheless,thoughIshmaelandtheIshmael-likearepresentedasimperfect,thatis,cheerlessandjudgment-warysonsofAbraham,theyare(inhisexegesishere)incorporatedinthefamilyofGod(those“whocometotherecognitionofGodbyfaith”).Origen’sapplicationofhisreadingrecalibratesIshmaelthe“blessed”andthoseChristianslikehim,eveniftheyhavenotbeenfullyliberatedintothecovenantpromise.ThecombinationofcloseattentiontowhatGenesistellsaboutIshmael’sgiftfromGodandhisdesiretoexposetwoexpressionsoffaithfoundamongpeopleinhiscongregationmovesOrigenatleastmomentarilytoanestimateofIshmaelthatisnotnearlysouncompromisinglynegativeasPaul’s.
Origentheninviteshiscongregationtopondertheexpulsionscene:
LetusseewhatAbrahamdoesmeanwhileafterSarahisdispleased.Hecastsoutthebondwomanandherson,butneverthelessgiveshimabottleofwater.Forhismotherdoesnothaveawelloflivingwater,norcouldtheboydrawwaterfromawell.IsaachaswellsforwhichhealsosuffersstrifeagainstthePhilistines;butIshmaeldrinkswaterfromabottle,butthisbottle,asitisabottle,fails,andtherefore,heisthirstyanddoesnotfindawell.26
Liketherabbiswithwhomhesometimesdiscussedscripture,OrigenconsidershisGenesispassagewithaneyeandeartootherbiblicaltexts.Hehasmentallyscannedthem,evaluatingtheirhomileticutility.Atthisjunctureinhissermon,scripturalreferencestobottle,water,andwellssuggestcreativepossibilities.ThesayingofJesustotheSamaritanwomanatthewellabout“livingwater”hasbecomepartoftheinterpretationhewilloffer,(p.174) ashastheGenesisnarrative’sstoryinchapter26ofthewellsthatIsaacreclaimed(theyhadoncebelongedtoAbraham)andprotected.Becauseitwillservetheargumenthewantstoadvance,Origenaltersadetailinthebiblicaltext,havingAbrahamgivethewaterbottletoIshmaelratherthantohismother(whereasGenesis21:14relatesthatthePatriarch“tookbreadandaskinofwater,andgaveittoHagar”).LiteralandfiguralmeaningsareoperatinginparallelasOrigendescribesHagarasonenotpossessing“awelloflivingwater”andashenotesthathersonwasunabletodrawwaterfromawell.ThesemotifsarerecognizablefromtheaccountofHagar’sandIshmael’sdirecircumstanceinthewilderness(Genesis21:15–
Page 19
Sarah and Hagar in Christian Retellings
Page 19 of 32
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofDenver; date: 27 October 2015
16).Atthestory’sliterallevel,thereisthatplighttoberegistered,butanothercrisisexistsatthespirituallevel,foritis“living”waterthatOrigensaysHagardoesnothaveaccessto,whileIshmaelisequippedonlywiththebottle,nowempty.ThecontrastOrigenmakeswithIsaac’swellsisatonce“factual”andspiritual—evenideological.Abraham’ssonbySarahisof“thepromise,”theprimarybeneficiaryofGod’sprovidentialcare,thebegetterof“thepeopleofadoption.”Hehasrightstohisfather’swells.Ontheotherhand,blessedanddestinedtobefatherof“agreatnation”thoughhemaybe,Ishmaelishereagainpicturedasbeing,incomparisonwithhisyoungerbrother,inferiorinstatusandsignificance.Indeed,thewaterbottlehereceives,soontobeempty,putshislife(andthatofHagar)atrisk,endangeringGod’sclaimabouthisfuture.TheGenesisnarrativeandelementsfromPaul’sallegoryareinterwovenbutdistinct.
Origenturnsthelessonshespiesinthisportionofthetextinthedirectionofhissermon’smainthemes.YouarenotlikedesperateIshmael,unabletofindawell,hetellspeopleinhiscongregation.Youareason(ordaughter)“ofpromise,asIsaac.”OrigenringsinProverbs5:15–16,withitsurgingthatthosewhoaspiretowisdomshoulddrinkfromtheirownabundantwells,andbenefitfromthewatersthatflowintheirstreets.27Heisgearingthisimageofabundantwellstohispresentemphasis,whichreiteratesPaul’suseofthetwosonsofAbrahamtodrawboundariesbetweenopposingreligiousbeliefsandbehaviors.Now,inOrigen’seraandsetting,thesonsrepresentJudaismandChristianity.
He“whoisbornaccordingtotheflesh”drinkswaterfromabottleandthewateritselffailshimandhelacksinmanythings.ThebottleoftheLawistheletterfromwhichthatcarnalpeopledrinks,andthencereceivesunderstanding.Thisletterfrequentlyfailsthem.Itcannotextricateitself;forthehistoricalunderstanding(historialisintelligentia)isdefectiveinmanythings.ButtheChurchdrinksfromtheevangelicandapostolicfountainswhichneverfail,but“runinthestreets,”becausetheyalwaysaboundandflowinthebreadthofspiritual(p.175) interpretation(spiritalisinterpretationis).TheChurchdrinksalso“fromwells”whenitdrawsandexaminescertaindeeperthingsoftheLaw.28
HavingregisteredhisclaimaboutJudaism’slackof“evangelicandapostolicfountains,”—thatis,thatithasnotbelievedintheonewhopromises“livingwater”—thepreacherturnstowardhisconcludingassertions,whichexpounduponwater,wells,andwomen.
Themysteryofthe“deeperthings”thatChristiansfindinspiritualinterpretationshedslightonanepisodeOrigenisanxioustoinsertinhistreatmentofwhatbefallHagarinthewilderness.AsaLogos-theologianinthetraditionofJustinMartyr,ClementofAlexandria(hispredecessorasacatechistthere),andothers,OrigenpresumesthatwhenGodappearsandisheardinJewishscripture,thisisnotthehighGodhimself,whoinhistranscendenceisbynatureinvisibleandincomprehensible,butratherGod’s“Word”/Logoswhospeaks,appearsinangelicform,andwho,asGodtheSon,will“inthefullnessoftime”beenfleshedasJesus.ThereisforOrigennorealtheologicaldistancebetweentheappearanceoftheangel-agentwhospeakswithdespairingHagar,reassuringherthatGodhas“heard”or“heeded”thevoiceof“theboywhereheis,”
Page 20
Sarah and Hagar in Christian Retellings
Page 20 of 32
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofDenver; date: 27 October 2015
andJesus’sappearancetotheSamaritanwoman.Godvisibleandaudibleis,forhimandothersinhisfaithcommunity,theWord,whobecameincarnateinJesusChrist.Thepreacher’sdominantinteresthereisinjuxtaposingtheonedialoguewiththeangelinGenesis21:17–19thatleadstoHagar’seyesbeingopenedtoseeasavingwellofwater(preservingthehopeofIshmaelbecoming“agreatnation”)withtheepisodeinJohn4:7–15inwhichaSamaritanwomandrawingwaterfromJacob’swellisengagedbyJesusinadiscussionaboutthe“livingwater”heprovides—thequickeningwatersheaskshimtogivetoher.
HowfarwillthepreachertakethisconnectionbetweentheSamaritanwoman,whorecognizesJesusasaprophet,receivinghistestimonythatheisthepromisedmessiahofGod,withdesperateHagar?Thetwostorieshaveepiphaniesofwaterandawellincommon.HagarleavesIshmaeltohimselfinordernottoseehisdying,andwhilesheweepsatadistanceanangelappears,tellingher:“Godhasheededthecryoftheboywhereheis.Come,liftuptheboyandholdhimbythehand,forIwillmakeagreatnationofhim”(Genesis21:17–18).Inthenextversewereadthat“Godopenedhereyesandshesawawellofwater.”Origen’slicenseaspreacherandexegeteenableshimtoinsinuateandapplytheJohanninephrase(concerningthewaterthatrescuesandpreserveslife)toIshmaelandHagar.This,Jesusdeclares,willbecome,inthosewhodrinkit,“aspringofwatergushinguptoeternallife”(John4:14).29
(p.176) OrigenassertsthatJesusdeclaredtotheSamaritanwoman“asifhewerespeakingwithHagarherself,”thattheone“whoshalldrinkofthewaterwhichIgive…shallnotthirstforever.”ToreadtheHagarstoryinthelightofJesus’spromiseof“livingwater,”thepreacherinsists,istobeinthecommunitythat“drawsandexaminesdeeperthingsfromtheLaw.”30
Whatmayhaveseemedtohishearers(andtomoderns)anunexpected,evenarbitraryconnectionoftwowomenandtwowellsandtworescuesflowseasilyfromOrigen’srepertoireastheologian-exegete-preacher.Hecapitalizesonobviousbutusefulandsuggestivecorrespondences.WenoticethatOrigen,renownedforhisspiritualizingstrategiesinexegesis,payscloseattentiontoHagar’s“historical”actionsandattitudes,asbiblicallynarrated,andthattheseobservationsplayastrongroleinhisrepresentationofher.Herwailingandtearsareseen,asthetextmakesclear,asworthyofdivineattention.WhatJohnThompsonreferstoas“literalHagar”isinthepreacher’smind,andhedepartssharplyfromthenegativecaricatureofherinPaul’sallegory,obligedtodosobythecontentoftheGenesistextread“historically,”forittellsofthegoodoutcomeforHagarandIshmaelintheirwildernessordeal.OrigenisusingHagar“tothinkwith,”buthisinterpretationofHagarisnotstrictlynorexclusivelymetaphoricalandspiritual.HiscloseattentiontoheractionsintheGenesistextallowshimtokeepinsightthewoman’s“history”—herdescriptioninscriptureasacharacter“in[her]ownright.”31
“Allegorical”Hagardoesnotfarenearlysowell,however,asOrigenemploysherinwhathemusthopewillbearousingconclusiontohishomily.HewondersaloudwhatsignificanceliesinthebiblicalclaimthattheLord“openedHagar’seyes”:
Page 21
Sarah and Hagar in Christian Retellings
Page 21 of 32
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofDenver; date: 27 October 2015
Howcanthesewordsberelatedtohistory?Forwhendowefind[inthetext]thatHagarhasclosedeyesandtheyarelateropened?Isnotthespiritualandmysticalmeaningofthesewordsclearerthanlight,thatthatpeoplewhichis“accordingtotheflesh”isabandonedandliesinhungerandthirst,suffering“notafamineofbreadnorathirstforwater,butathirstforthewordofGod”[seeAmos8:11]untiltheeyesofthesynagogueareopened?32
OncemoreadetailintheGenesistext—here,somethingunexplained—sparksaninterpretivemove.ThereisnomentionofHagar’sblindnessorclosedeyesprecedingtheiropening,andthusonlyametaphoricalmeaningwillsuffice.OrigenrevertstoPaul’sassociationofHagarwiththelawthatenslaves,butthewordthatmobilizeshisargumentderivesfromRomans11:25,wheretheApostleseekstoexplainwhya“blindness”(or,“hardeningofheart”)hascomeuponpartofIsrael.Thislackofvision,Paulasserts,(p.177) abidesuntilalltheGentilesareincorporatedinGod’splan,andthen“allIsraelwillbesaved.”Untiltheblindness,whichisthe“veiloftheletter,”istakenawaybyGod’sangel,she—Israel(Hagar’snonliteral,allegoricalsignifier)—cannot,orwillnot,seethe“livingwater”offeredtoher.Thefinaldenunciationisstark:“FornowtheJewsliearoundthewellitself,buttheireyesareclosedandtheycannotdrinkfromthewelloftheLawandtheprophets.”33
Intheend,asinthebeginningofhishomily,Origen’scriticism,judgment,andwarningagainstJudaismisalsobroughtclosertohome—replayed—inanadmonitiondirectedtoChristians.WeChristianstoo,hesays,liearoundthewell.Weholdandreadthedivinescriptures,“butwedonottouchuponthespiritualsense.”The“literal”Hagarisenlistedasamodelandinspiration.Origensuggests:Maybethereisaneedamongus,thefaithful,for“tearsandincessantprayerthattheLordmayopenoureyes.”34
Yetanothercouplingofapassageintheday’sreadingfromMoseswithanincidentinaGospelservesthepreacher’spurpose:eventheblindmeninJericho(Matthew20:30)wouldnothavereceivedtheirsighthadtheynotcriedouttotheLord,likeHagarinherdesperateneed.Whilequicktoreassurehislistenersthatheisnotclaimingthattheireyeshavenotbeenopened,Origennonethelessstateshisfearthatawakenedmembersofhischurchmayclosetheireyesagain,fallingintoaslumbersodeepthattheycannotbe“watchfulinthespiritualmeaning.”Or,thoughawareofdangeroustemptations,thesemaynotstirthemtolabor,toavoidsleepandto“contemplatethingswhicharespiritual.”Ortheymightfallintotheerrorsthatbeset“thecarnalpeoplesetaroundthewateritself.”AwordfromtheprophetDavid(Psalms131:4–5)canonlybeheardasanexhortation:Untilabeliever“findsaplacefortheLord,atabernaclefortheGodofJacob,”hewillnot,orshouldnot,sleepnorslumber.OrigenproclaimsthatthistabernacleistobefashionedandfoundwithintheindividualChristian,enlightenedandencouragedbythings“divineandworthythatthehumanracemightlearnfromthewordsofGod.”Throughouthishomily,andemphaticallyhereatitsconclusion,OrigenpromoteshisbeliefthatspiritualmaturationandtheadvancetowardallthatGodpromisestohispeopleiseffectedprimarilythroughdeepenedinsightintodivinewritings.TolearnhowtohearandtoheedGod’swordsinthesacredtextsistobecomespiritual
Page 22
Sarah and Hagar in Christian Retellings
Page 22 of 32
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofDenver; date: 27 October 2015
andfree—tobesaved.
OrigenhasreiteratedtheassertionvitaltoearlyChristiansthattheyareheirsofGod’scovenantpromisesmadetoAbraham,continuedthroughIsaacandJacob.Andyet,morethansomeChristianexegetesandtheologianswereinclinedtodo,Origen’ssermonrevealedhisconcerntohonortheblessinggiventoIshmael,ensuringthatfromhimwouldcomeastrong(p.178) nation.Thismotif,whichunderlinesdivinefavorshared(thoughdifferentiatedasgreaterandlesser),isbornofOrigen’sloyaltytowhatGenesisrelates,anditresists(atleastinthatmomentinthesermon)thestarkcontrastthatinPaul’sallegoryinGalatianspitsthesonsagainsteachother—theonefreeandsaved,theotherenslavedandcondemned.OfcourseOrigenacceptsandenunciatesthealreadyentrenchedandnecessaryclaimofthechurchthatbelieversinChristhavebeen“adopted”aschildrenofAbrahamandareheirsofthedivineboonsgiventothem.Intheimageryofhissermon,theJewshavefailedtodrinkfromthewellofscripture,andhaveputthemselvesatadistancefromGod—theGodnowunderstoodastheonewhoinJesusChristprovidesthe“livingwater”guaranteeingeternallife.BecauseinOrigen’sdaytheChristiansenjoystrongerself-definitionasarecognizedanddistinctreligion,hespendsasmuchtimeapplyingthesekindsofargumentstotensionswithinthechurchesashedoestotensionsbetweenJewsandChristians.Yes,themembersofchurchesarenowexclusivelythechildrenofAbrahamandSarah,throughIsaacandJacob,yetOrigeninsiststhatitiswithinChristiancommunities,intheethicalpracticesofindividualChristians,andeveninthewaysbelieversclingtoGod(in“slavishfear”orin“thefreedomoflove”)thatpeopleworkoutwhichson—IshmaelorIsaac—theymostresemble.Origen’sscripturalinterpretationbynomeansignoresthezoneofreligiouscompetitioninwhichhelivesandworks.However,hewritesandspeakstoChristians,andturnsthebiblicalwisdomthathefindsinward—directingittothemultifacetedchurchesandthemultifacetedindividualsmakinguptheirnumber.
ThewomenofAbraham,inOrigen’sretelling,areoften,itistrue,recognizableintheirsimilaritytootheridealizedandallegorizedrepresentationsbyotherauthors.Andyet,becauseOrigenisobligedtoreadcompletelyandtoworkthroughtheday’slectionfromGenesis,hebreaksfromPaul’sone-dimensionalcaricatureofHagar,includingheramongthosewhoseeyesopenedtosee(andtodrinkfrom)thewellthatgivessalvation.Likewise,the“blessing”thatinscriptureGodgivestoIshmaelisnotbypassed,andtheeldersonisatleastbriefly,orqualifiedly,presented(contraPaul)asoneamongthosewhoenjoyGod’sfavor.
TheframeforourexplorationofOrigen’ssermonanditsinterpretivestrategyisacomparativeanalysisofhowsacredstorieswereretoldinantiquityinthreedifferentreligiouscommunities.WehaveseenOrigenandhisthinking,especiallyaboutJudaism,inthehistoricalcontextofthe“partingoftheways”betweenJewsandChristiansasthatseparationhadadvancedinthethirdcentury.35Origen’streatmentofAbraham’swomendisplaysnotonlyhisdexterousimagination,butalsothevibrantmultireligious(p.179)worldinwhichhemadesenseforhimselfandforhisfellowbelieversbypursuingJesus’sadmonitionto“searchthescriptures.”
Page 23
Sarah and Hagar in Christian Retellings
Page 23 of 32
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofDenver; date: 27 October 2015
ChristianArtists’InterpretationsofAbraham’sWomen
TheAshburnhamPentateuch
UniqueinearlyChristianiconographyisthefollowingdepiction(Figure5.1)oftheconflictbetweenSarahandHagar:
Figure5.1 SarahmakeshercasetoAbraham.AshburnhamPentateuch.©BibliothéquenationaledeFrance,Paris.Ms.lat.nouv.acq.2334,folio18r.
AcompressionoftheactionsfamiliartousfromGenesis21:8–13(andfromOrigen’ssermon),thepaintedimagehasbothHagarandSarahpresent,standingbeforetheseatedAbraham.IshmaelandIsaacalsofaintlyappearinthedamagedpainting,depictedasyoungboys,onesmallerthantheother,“playing”—thatis,tussling—infrontoftheirmothers.“HereisHagar,”theLatinsuperscriptaboveherheadtellsus.Sarah,thescene’scentralfigure,gesturesinAbraham’sdirection.TheLatin(paraphrasingGenesis21:1)thatsurroundsherrelatesherspeech:“SarahsaystoAbraham,‘Behold,(the)sonofmyservantwillnotbe(an)heir!’”Abrahamisgivennowords,buthisextendedhandisinterpretableasarequestforthewomen’stestimonies,ormorelikely,hisresponsetoSarah’sdeclaration.Initscontent,theimagefreezesthatpartofthenarrativeinGenesis21:1–14theartistwishestopresent.Itmaybesimplyareport,graphicallydisplayed.Yettheviewerissupposedtounderstandwhatthistension-filledmomentresolved,andwhatit“states.”Sarahistheactor.Inthiscontest,sheisalsothevictor.Herdemand,approvedbyGod(Genesis21:12),securesIsaac’sinheritance.IshmaelandhismotherHagararetobesentaway.
Thesceneisonlyoneofseventhatfillfolio18aintheAshburnhamPentateuch.Theilluminationsdepictepisodesfromchapters19through21inGenesis,anarrativesectionthatbeginswiththestoryofLotandthedestructionofSodomandGommorahandendswiththeejectionofHagarandIshmaelfromAbraham’shousehold.Atthebottomoffolio18aanothercriticalincidentinSarah’slifeisshown(Figure5.2)intwoscenesabuttingtheonejustdescribed.
Page 24
Sarah and Hagar in Christian Retellings
Page 24 of 32
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofDenver; date: 27 October 2015
Figure5.2 Sarah’sencounterwithAbimelech.Detail.AshburnhamPentateuch.©BibliothéquenationaledeFrance,Paris.Ms.lat.nouv.acq.2334,folio18r.
InapicturetotheleftsideofthepageweareshownAbimelechsleepingonhisbed,withhisqueenandSarahidentifiedasthetwowomenseatednearby.(Abimelech’squeendoesnotappearintheGenesisnarrative;perhapstheartistbelievedthatherappearanceintheking’sbedroomwouldheightenthedramaandimplicationsofhishaving“taken”Sarah.)SomeofthewordsspokentoAbimelechinhisdream-statedialoguewithGodarerelatedintheLatin.“HeretheLordtellsKingAbimelechthatSarahisthe(p.180) (p.181) (p.182) wifeofAbraham”—hiswife,nothissister.Abimelech,soinformed,heedsGod’swarningandissparedthedeaththatwouldhavecometohimhadhehadintercoursewithSarahandhadhenotreturnedhertoherhusband.
Theadjoininglowerscenedepictsthisdangerousepisode’sconclusion.AbimelechonhisthronedispatchesAbrahamandSarahtosafesettlementsomewherewithinhisterritory.“KingAbimelech,whereherestoresSarahtoAbrahamandgivestohimsheepandoxenandmaleandfemaleslaves”(seeGenesis20:14).OscarvonGebhardtdescribedthebody-languageofthescenes’characters:Abimelech“holdshisrighthandaloft,asifforanoath;withthelefthandhesurrendersSarahtoAbraham,whoseizesherlefthandwithbothhandsandinclineshisheadtowardsher.”36
ItisworthaskingwhetherthethreepanelsfeaturingSarah—inAbimelech’schamber,departingfromGerarafterhercloseencounterwiththeking,andbeforeAbraham,makinghercaseagainstIshmaelandhismother—aresimplygraphicrepetitionsofthetext.Hasthepaintersimplyrenderedtheliteral/historicalaccountinimagesandwithidentifyingLatintags?Orisitmorelikelythattheartistintendedinthesescenesmorethansheerchronicling?Theincidentsselectedforportrayalhaveincommonanoccupationwithdecisions,choices,ethicalquandaries,andtheactionsofGodinsuchhumandramas.IntheiralienresidenceinGerar,therewasAbraham’sfearofhisowndeath,shouldhiswifeSarahbedesired,Abimelech’sthreatened“integrityofheart”ashesoughtto“approach”thewomanhebelievedtobeunmarried,andGod’sinterventionwhichprotectedandrescuedSarah.Abimelech’sreturnofSarahtoAbrahamfolloweduponatruth-tellingencounterbetweenthetwomen(Genesis20:9–13),andwas
Page 25
Sarah and Hagar in Christian Retellings
Page 25 of 32
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofDenver; date: 27 October 2015
accompaniedbythegiftsdepictedinthepainting.Endangeredvirtuesarepreserved.OthermomentsinSarah’slife,andintheinteractionsbetweenthepatriarch’swives,couldhaveclaimedspace,buttheseimagesrepresentwhattheartistwishedtosetforthasthecentrallyimportantoutcomeofthescripturalnarrative:thecovenantpromiseofGodtoAbrahamrestswiththechildpromisedto,andbornof,Sarah—Isaac.WithouthavingahandofGodpointingtowardSarahasshespeakstoherhusband,thepersonviewingthepaintedscenerecallsthatthiswasGod’sdecree.SarahisdefendingtheGod-preferredheir,andthepeopleofhislineage.InwhatseemtobestraightforwardrenditionsofbiblicalhappeningsconcerningSarahandHagar,thereresidediscerniblelessonsandteachings.
Weareleft,however,withanintriguingquestion.Ifthesepaintingswerecreatedwithmoralinstructioninmind,howisSarahdepicted,andwhatishermessageinethicalterms?InthefirstofthescenesdepictingSarah’slife,shesitscomposedlyinAbimelech’schamber,butnoparticularindicationisgiveneitherofherstateofmindorheractions.Indeed,theimagemay(p.183) haveitsfocusnotsomuchinSarah(andAbimelech’squeen)asinthesleepingking.Forthebiblicallyinformedviewerthescenecallstomindwhattranspiredintheking’sdream:God’sdisclosureaboutthemarriedstatusofthewomanhehasclaimedforhimself.NotholdingherresponsibleforcomplyingwithAbraham’sfalsehood,wearefreetoseeSarahasaninnocentparticipant—evenapawn—inaportentousstruggleornegotiationinvolvingtwomales(three,withtheLordcountedin)—allofwhomhaveavitalinvestmentinwhatdecisionsaremadeandwhatactionsaretaken.Similarly,Sarah’spresenceinAbimelech’ssend-offofthepaircarriesnoobviousandperceptiblemoralimportance—excepttothosewhoknowthatintheGenesistextshehasbeenexoneratedofanysuspicionbytheking,whotellsher,“youarecompletelyvindicated”(20:16b).Another,arguablygreater,significancebelongstoSarah,atleastinthemindsofthosewhoknowthenarrativewell,forinthesucceedinglineswelearnthatSarah,havingescapedbecomingAbimelech’sconcubine,conceivesandgivesbirthtoAbraham’schild,inaccordancewithwhatGodhadpromised(21:1–2).
Thecontentofthefinalscene,whichtakesustotheseparationofAbraham’stwosonsandwives,hasonlySarahasaspeaker.Veryprobablytheartistseesherasaparagonofvirtueintwoimportantsenses—sheisnotoneofthemorallycompromisedcharactersinthisartisticcomposition(theartdoesnotpresentuswiththeSarahwhoscoffs,norwiththeSarahwhoisirate),andherworthinessexpressesitselfasresponsivenessandloyaltytowhatGodhasrevealedthathewilldowithher.TheclaimthatshemakesisbasedinGod’sownproclamationthattheheirofthecovenantwithAbrahamwouldbeIsaac.Further,depictionoftheconflictbetweenthetwoboyswouldservetojustifySarah’sfearthathersonisvulnerabletoIshmael’saggression,whichitselfchallengestheprovidentialplanofGod.HagarandIshmaelarepresentinthepaintingasantagonists,butSarahisadamant.SheistheforemotherofthecovenantpeopleofGod,who,forthosegatheringforworshipinachurchinthesixthcentury,arethemselvesandtheirfellow-believersinChrist.
TheAshburnhamPentateuch’spaintingofAbraham’stwowomenandtwosonsinhis
Page 26
Sarah and Hagar in Christian Retellings
Page 26 of 32
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofDenver; date: 27 October 2015
presencemustfinallybedecipherednotsimplyasliteralorhistorical,butratherasacomponentpartinanartisticpresentationthat,mediatedthroughitsselectionofactionstobeportrayed,strivestowardpictorialethicaleducation.Itsstrategyisnotallegorical—rather,thepaintedscenes’persons,deeds,andtheirfates,forgoodorforill,serveasmoralexamples.
IntheRomanchurchdedicatedtotheVirginMaryandcreatedundertheauspicesofSixtusIII,popefrom432–440,wefindthisbeautifullyexecutedtwo-tiereddepictionofAbraham’shospitalitytospecialvisitors(Figure5.3).
Figure5.3 ThehospitalityofAbraham.Amid-fifth-centuryCEmosaic.SantaMariaMaggiore,Rome©ArtHistoryImages.
(p.184) Withbendedkneeandoutstretchedhand,thepatriarch,hisadvancedagewellcapturedinhiswhitehairandbeard,extendshiswelcometotheangels,oneofwhomisdistinguishedbythetranslucentmandorlasurroundinghim.(WerecallthatinGenesis18Abrahamextendshishospitalityto“threemen,”butonedeliversthepromiseofthebirthofIsaacwithinayear,andtherepeatedannouncementisattributed,atGenesis18:13–14,to“theLord.”)ThemosaicistisChristianizingthescripturalsceneinanunmistakableway:inaccordancewithChristianLogos-theology,itistheWordofGod,theSon,whoispresenttoAbrahamandSarahastheLord—hewhowouldbecomeincarnateasJesus,God’s(p.185) anointedone,theChrist.37(Theovalmandorla,inthisperiodandafterward,mostfrequentlysurroundsimagesoftheresurrectedJesus,orofMary.)
Thelowersceneistwoinone,withAbrahamintheforegroundturnedtowardSarah(herheadcoveredandherdressahandsomecombinationofwhite,black,andbrightorange).
Page 27
Sarah and Hagar in Christian Retellings
Page 27 of 32
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofDenver; date: 27 October 2015
PresumablyheasksthatSarahprepareamealofcakes(Genesis18:6),buthiscountenancecouldbethoughttoregistersomethingbetweenanxietyandconsternation.Atadeeperdimensionintheimage,Abrahamturnstothetable,abouttosetbeforehisangel-messengerguests“thecalf,tenderandgood”(Genesis18:7).Twooftheangelslooktowardtheirhost,thecenteronereachingtowardtheplatterasiftoreceiveit.
Wehaveseenthisbasiciconographybefore,bothinthefloorpanelintheSepphorissynagogueandinthemosaicwithintheRavenna’ssixth-centurychurchofSanVitale.ThevisitationoftheangelstoAbraham,withtheevent’smainpurposeimplied—thepromiseconcerningthebirthofasontoSarah—wasforbothJewsandChristiansasacredstory,butonethatChristianartists,aswellastheologians,wereespeciallykeentoreimagineandreimage.
Wetakenoteofasmalldetailinthismosaicartist’stransformationofthebiblicalnarrativeintoaChristianone.Abovethedoorlintelofthesmallbuilding(the“tent”)behindSarahappearsacross.ThismarkingofthecampofAbrahamasChristianisinkeepingwithatypologicalunderstandingoftheLord’s/angels’announcementthatSarahwillgivetothepatriarchason.Highabovethissceneinthechurch’sgreatarchthereappearsthedepictionoftheotherannunciationwhichitanticipates,Gabriel’svisittoMary(Figure5.4).
Figure5.4 TheAnnunciation,amosaicdecorationinthetriumphalarchofSta.MariaMaggiore,Rome.Mid-fifthcenturyCE.©ArtHistoryImages.
Forfifth-centuryChristianswhogatheredinthegreatchurchofSaintMary,theportraitofAbrahamandSarahwasavisuallyreadableforecastandcelebrationnotonlyoftheparents-to-beofIsaac,butalso,andmoreprofoundly,oftheyoungvirginwhowouldbecome“themotherofGod.”38
BiblicalinterpretationsofAbraham’stwowomenasweencountertheminthetwoquitedifferentvisualcommentaries—thefoliointheAshburnhamPentateuchandSta.MariaMaggiore’smosaic—reveal,especiallywhenconsideredalongsideNewTestamentpassagesandOrigen’ssermon,thevarietywithwhichtheseChristiansthinkersre-toldandre-presentedtheirsacredstories.Takentogether,ourtextsandartinthischapterdemonstratethestrongtendencytowardseekingmoral,typological,andspiritual
Page 28
Sarah and Hagar in Christian Retellings
Page 28 of 32
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofDenver; date: 27 October 2015
meaningsthatemergedimmediatelyandgrewin(p.186) creativity(andcomplexity)inChristianliteratureandartoftheearlycenturiesofthecommonera.
ThesemodesofinterpretationalsoappearedinJewishwritings—admittedlylesssointhemidrashoftherabbinicperiodthaninPhilo’sreadingsofscripture—andalsoinMuslimtafsirandart.WhileChristiansdidnotcometoignoretheliteralandhistoricalelementsinthetexts,andJewsandMuslimsdidnotshyawayfrommoral,philosophical,andtheologicalorspiritualimplicationstheyfoundinthetextstheystudied,itisstillquitenoticeableinthecaseofinterpretationsofAbraham’swomenhowstronglyPaulandOrigen,inparticular,pursued,andledotherstopursue,meaningsbeyondthe“letter.”
Qur’aninterpreters,whilehonoringSarahandcountinghersonIsaacaprophetofGod,weremostoccupiedbythefortunesoftheotherhalfofAbraham’sfamily,HagarandIshmael,whodwelledinthevicinityof“God’shouse”inMecca.ToMuslimvisionsandunderstandingsofAbraham’swomen,comparedwiththoseoftheJewsandChristians,wenowturn.
Notes:
(1.)ElizabethClark’sessay“InterpretiveFateamidtheChurchFathers”appearsinPhyllisTribleandLettyRussell,eds.,Hagar,Sarah,andTheirChildren;thisquotationat143.
(2.)ThemakingofSarahintoavirtueisakintoPhilo’streatmentofherinhisOnAbraham42:“Everywhereandalwaysshewasathisside,noplaceoroccasionomitted,histruepartnerinlifeandlife’sevents,resolvedtosharealikethegoodandtheill.Shedidnot,likesomeotherwomen,runawayfrommishapsandliereadytopounceonpiecesofgoodluck,butacceptedherportionofbothwithallalacrityasthefitandpropertestofaweddedwife.”IfindconvincingtheargumentadvancedinHughMontefiore,ACommentaryontheEpistletotheHebrews,194,thatSarah,notAbraham,isthesubjectofthesentenceinHebrews11:11,yielding:“ByfaithSarahherself,thoughbarren,receivedpowertoconceive,evenwhenshewastooold,becausesheconsideredhimfaithfulwhohadpromised.”
(3.)Sanders,E.P.,PaulandPalestinianJudaism.SeetreatmentofSanders,andothersinJohnG.Gager,ReinventingPaul.
(4.)Itremainsamatterofscholarlydebatewhetherthese“agitators”(5:12),withtheir“Judaizing”agendawereJewswhohadbecomefollowersofJesus(“Jewish-Christians,”astheyaresometimeslabeled),insistinguponamodeofbeliefandbehaviorthatcontinuedinobservanceofJudaism’sprecepts,or,rather,thattheywereGentileconvertswhowereintentuponincorporatingintheirnewfaithoneofthecentral“traditionsoftheancestors,”asPaulidentifiesJudaisminaphrase.
(5.)Sanders,Paul,[431]–556.
(6.)SeeGalatians3:6–29,andRomans4.Genesis15:6iscitedbyPaulinGalatians3:6
Page 29
Sarah and Hagar in Christian Retellings
Page 29 of 32
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofDenver; date: 27 October 2015
andRomans4:3.
(7.)HansDieterBetz’sanalysisofthispassage,towhichIammuchindebtedinwhatfollows,isfoundinhiscommentary,Galatians,238–252.OnthepassageinGalatians4:21–31,Betzcomments:“Paul’smethodofinterpretationisstatedclearlyinv24a.Whathecalls‘allegory’isreallyamixtureofwhatwewouldcallallegoryandtypology.Itshouldbeadmittedthatbothmethodsarecloselyrelated.TypologyinterpretshistoricalmaterialcommonlyusedinprimitiveChristianity.Persons,events,andinstitutionsofScriptureandtraditionaretakenasprototypesofpresentpersons,events,andinstitutions,whichareexplainedastheirfulfillment,repetition,orcompletionwithinaframeworkofsalvationhistory.Indistinctiontotypology,allegorytakesconcretemattersmentionedinScriptureandtradition(mythology)tobethesurfaceappearanceorvestigeofunderlyingdeepertruthswhichthemethodclaimstobringtolight.Therebyconcretemattersinthetextaretransportedintogeneralnotionsofphilosophicalortheologicaltruth.Paul’stextconsistsofquotationsofLXXandJewishhaggadicmaterialinGreektranslation;hedoesnotmakeanydistinctionbetweenthetwo.InageneralsensePaul’sinterpretationoftheAbrahamtraditionandofthefiguresofHagarandSarahispartofahistoryofsuchinterpretations.Paul,however,doesnotsimplytakeoverthisinterpretation,butatthesametimehegivesithisownimprint”(239).
(8.)JerusalemasaheavenlyplaceisspokenofonlyhereinPaul’sletters,butisimaginedinvariouswaysinJewishapocalypticandearlyChristianwritingslike4Ezra7:26;10:40ff,Jubilees4:26,2Apoc.Baruch4:207;32:2–3,1Enoch90:28ff.,Hebrews12:22–24,andRevelation21:1–22:5.Seenotes81–85inBetz,Galatians.
(9.)ErnestDeWittBurton,Galatians,226.
(10.)Betz,Galatians,249.
(11.)SeeG.WalterHansen,AbrahaminGalatians,162.
(12.)LeanderKeck,inhisintroductiontoRomansinWayneMeeks,ed.,TheHarperCollinsStudyBible,2115,drewattentiontothefactthatthediscussioninRomansisframedinasituationquiteunlikethatinwhichPauldefendedhis“gospeltotheuncircumcised”whenmeetingwithJames,Peter,andJohninJerusalem(theeventPaulrecountsinGalatians1–2):“inRomeheneededtodefendthecontinuingvalidityofIsraelinGod’spurpose.Hisletter,therefore,insiststhatthereisonegospelforallhumanity,albeit‘totheJewfirst’”(1:16).
(13.)RonaldE.Heine,Origen:HomiliesonGenesisandExodus,127–135.InquotationsofHeine’stranslation,slightchangesandadaptationsaremadeinspellingsofnames(“Hagar”for“Agar,”forexample).ThesesermonsofOrigen,preachedinCaesareaMaritimaca.238–244,surviveinLatintranslations—orbetter,paraphrases—bythescholar-monasticRufinusofAquileia(ca.340–410),asupporterofOrigen’swhencontroversyswirledaroundhisworkandthought,tendinginthedirectionofbranding“Origenism”aheresy.Heine,Origen,1–43,providesaconciseandhelpfulintroduction
Page 30
Sarah and Hagar in Christian Retellings
Page 30 of 32
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofDenver; date: 27 October 2015
tothelifeofOrigenandtothehistoryofthesesermons,includingtreatmentofRufinusastranslator.
(14.)GerhardvonRad,Genesis,225.
(15.)Butterworth,OnFirstPrinciples,4.2.4.
(16.)Origen,HomilyVII,127.
(17.)Ibid.
(18.)Ibid.,128–129.
(19.)Origen,FirstPrinciples4.3.5,297.
(20.)Origen,HomilyVII,129.
(21.)Ibid.,130.
(22.)Ibid.,131.Here,Origen’sdebttoPaulissurpassedbyhisdebttoPhilo,whointhecourseofworkingoutviaallegoryalessonaboutthetrainingofthemind(Abraham),anditsneedfor“preliminarystudies”(Hagar)towhichknowledge,philosophy,thevirtues(Sarah)givesassent,representsHagar’sflight“fromthefaceofSarah”(Genesis16:6–8)intheseterms:“thesoulwasfoundfleeingfromvirtue,notbeingabletoreceivediscipline.”SeePhilo,QuestionsandAnswersonGenesis3:27,47.InThePosterityandExileofCain33:130,theideaisconnectedtoanothersegmentofthestoryofthetwowomen:“[God],[i.e.,scripture]showsusHagarfillingawater-skinandgivingthechilddrink.Hagarrepresentsimperfecttraining,beinghandmaidofSarahwhorepresentsperfectvirtue.”
(23.)Origen,HomilyVII,131.
(24.)JohnL.Thompson,WritingtheWrongs,31.
(25.)Origen,HomilyVII,131–132.
(26.)Origen,HomilyVII,133.
(27.)InitsowncontextintheHebrewtextofProverbstheadviceinvokesmetaphorsofwater/liquidsinrelationtomale-femalerelations,sexualenjoyment,andwarningsagainstaman’sintoxicationwithanotherwoman,and“embrac[ing]thebosomofanadulteress”(v.20).Further,itclearlywarnsagainstlettingwatersspilloutintothestreetsandflowaway.
(28.)Origen,HomilyVII,133.
(29.)RufinushasaddedvivaetotheoldLatintextoftheBiblethathequotes,whichreferssimplytoputeumaquae(awellofwater),buthisadaptationnodoubtreflectsthe
Page 31
Sarah and Hagar in Christian Retellings
Page 31 of 32
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofDenver; date: 27 October 2015
GreekofOrigen,whohasdrawn“living”waterfromJohn4:10–11intohistreatmentofGenesis21:19.
(30.)Origen,HomilyVII,133.
(31.)Thompson’sassessmentofOrigen’streatmentofHagarisincisive.InhisWritingtheWrongs,31,weread:“WhatmakesOrigen’simageofHagartrulyenigmatic…isthat,havingdrawnsuchapotentiallytoxicconnectionbetweenHagarandtheunspiritual‘letter,’heshowsnointerestinvilifyingHagar.PaulmaythinkthatHagarsymbolizestheoldcovenant,butOrigensidestepsanysuchconclusion.InsteadoffaultingHagar,whetherthehistoricalconcubineortheallegoricalone,Origenallegoricallydisparagesthebottle(ofwater)thatAbrahamgavetoHagarassheleft.InthiswayOrigendoesnotbrandHagarwiththestigmaofthelawandtheletter,butactuallyfreesherfromboth:‘ThebottleofLawistheletter,fromwhichthatcarnalpeopledrinks…Thisletterfrequentlyfailsthem,…forthehistoricalunderstandingisdefectiveinmanythings.’TheChurchontheotherhand,drinksfromthefountainofspiritualinterpretation—asdoesHagar,itwouldsuddenlyseem.Shethusemergesnotasascapegoatbutasanexemplarofsorts.LiketheSamaritanwoman…Hagarhashadhereyesopenedtoseethetruewelloflivingwater,whichisJesusChrist.Apparently,sheisnolongertobecountedamongthe‘carnal’Jews.”
(32.)Origen,HomilyVII,134.
(33.)Ibid.
(34.)Ibid.,134–135.
(35.)SeeinparticularDanielBoyarin,ARadicalJewandJohnDavidDawson,ChristianFiguralReading.
(36.)OscarvonGebhardt,TheMiniaturesoftheAshburnhamPentateuch,14.
(37.)InanotherSta.MariaMaggioremosaicscene,thehaloedChristoverseestheblessingthatMelchizedekbestowsuponAbrahamfromthecloudsabove,hishandextendeddownwardtowardMelchizedekandthebasketofloavesheliftsuptowardthepatriarch,whoisamountedwarriorattheheadofhisarmy.
(38.)SeeinRobinJensen,FacetoFace,191–194,ahelpfulsummarizationofthedevelopmentofearlyiconographictraditionsofMary.ThetheologyandsupersessionistideologyofChristianpowerinthefifthcenturywasaggressive,withtypologyitsforcefulmedium.ThestrongthemeofJas’Elsner’sImperialRomeandChristianTriumphissummarizedinhiscomments,228,onSta.MariaMaggiore’sart:
ItcomprehensivelyreinterpretsadetailedOldTestamentcycle(onthenavewalls)intermsofitsfulfillmentinthetriumphofChristianity.ItisnotjustthatspecificOldTestamentthemesprefigurethelifeofChrist,butthatthewholenarrativeofJewishhistoryispresentedassubservientto,completedin,theIncarnation….
Page 32
Sarah and Hagar in Christian Retellings
Page 32 of 32
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofDenver; date: 27 October 2015
Suchvisualprogrammesinthemajorchurchestransposedtherelativelysmall-scaletypologicalimagesofcatacombsandsarcophagi,aswellasthestilltinierChristianimageryofgems,glassware,andivorytoamonumentalgrandeur.Indoingso,theytransformedasectarianimageryofcultidentityintoacanonicaliconographyofstatereligionwheretheonlyplaceforpagans(suchastheMagi)orJews(thefiguresinOldTestamentcycles)wasasastagetobesurpassedinChristianity’steleologyoftriumphalism.