San Diego County Achievement Gap Task Force Building Systems to Improve Teaching and Learning While Implementing the Common Core State Standards Superintendents’ and Principals’ Forum February 24, 2014 San Diego Convention Center
Dec 27, 2015
San Diego County Achievement Gap Task Force
Building Systems to Improve Teaching and
Learning While Implementing the
Common Core State Standards
Superintendents’ and Principals’ Forum
February 24, 2014San Diego Convention Center
San Diego County Achievement Gap Task Force
Welcome!
Overview of Agenda and Outcomes
Larry Perondi Randy Ward
San Diego County Achievement Gap Task Force
Purposes for the Day
Examine district-wide and school-wide systems that support the implementation of Common Core State Standards while continuing to close the achievement gap
Reflect on what systems are “in place” to improve teaching & learning and identify next steps for action
San Diego County Achievement Gap Task Force
Closing the Achievement GapCommon education standards are essential for producing the educated work force America needs to remain globally competitive. This…will help ensure that all students can receive the college-and career-ready, world-class education they deserve, no matter where they live.
Craig BarrettCEO, Intel
San Diego County Achievement Gap Task Force
Knowing Your Leadership Voice for Common Core
Mathematics:Five Essential Elements for
Greatness
Timothy Kanold, PhD
Knowing Your CCSS-M Leadership Voice: Five Essential Elements for Greatness!
A vision cannot be true or false but ultimately is evaluated against other possible directions for your classroom, your school or your district…
Timothy D. Kanold, Ph.D. [email protected] @tkanold
Turning Your CCSS-M Vision Into Action: Defining Greatness!
Turn to a shoulder partner… and give them your 30 second CCSS-M Mathematics “message” that you teach to those that look to you…
Your Teachable Point of View (TPOV)
“A cohesive set of ideas and concepts that a person is able to clearly articulate to others”
—Noel M. Tichy, director, Global Leadership Partnership, and professor of management
and organizations, University of Michigan
Common Core State Standards
Learning How Is Now Part of the Guaranteed and Viable Curriculum
MathematicalPractices
Eight standards K–12
MathematicalContent
About 35 standards per grade level K–8
About 55 Standards per grade 9-12
Understanding
Impacts Vision for learning!
Impacts Vision for
Assessing!
The Leadership TPOV for effective change in Great Schools!
1. The Grain Size of Change is the collaborative Teacher Team
2.The Grain Size of Analysis is a 3-4 week Unit of Instruction
The Grain Size of Change!
The grade level or course based collaborative team is the fundamental building block of the PLC journey…
Essential Expectation #1: Coherence
Defined autonomy – the freedom to act and to lead within well defined boundaries…
Vision is your most important weapon…
Coherence resides in Vision Implementation - Your voice of authority in your school or
district
http://www.flickr.com/photos/roland_urbanek/4712188695/
One of the greatest problems with mathematics instruction, and instruction in general in most school districts, is that it is too inconsistent from classroom to classroom, school to school, and district to district
— Morris & Hiebert (2011)
An Inequity Eraser!
The grade level or course based collaborative team is the fundamental building block of the PLC journey…
CCSS-M needs a Simultaneous Loose and Tight PLC Culture…
Defined autonomy – the freedom to act and to lead within well defined boundaries…
For Example, teachers choose mathematical tasks every day! Describe how your faculty currently choose daily student examples and tasks?
Essential Expectation #2: Rigor through Complexity of Reasoning
Developing the adult knowledge capacity in your school…
Four Claims Used in SBAC Test Specifications
Claim #1Concepts & Procedures
Claim #2Problem Solving
-------------------------Claim #4
Modeling & Data Analysis
Claim #3Communicating
Reasoning
Students can explain and apply mathematical concepts and interpret and carry out mathematical procedures with precision and fluency.
Students can clearly and precisely construct viable arguments to support their own reasoning and to critique the reasoning of others.
Students can solve a range of complex well-posed problems in pure and applied mathematics, making productive use of knowledge and problem solving strategies.----------------------------------------------------------Students can analyze complex, real-world scenarios and can construct and use mathematical models to interpret and solve problems.
40%
60%
What adult behaviors and actions need to become the collaborative team priority to fully implement the CCSS-M?
23
Vision Focus – Differentiating Your School Priorities
Essential Expectation #3: Rigor through Balanced Common Unit Assessments
Ensuring high-quality
Common assessments
Common tasks
Common homework
…and the accurate scoring of those assessments and tasks
There is no debate on the Instruction and Assessment vision for CCSS-M!
Evaluating the Evidence – John Hattie (2009 & 2012) Meta-analysis of over 800 studies…
Spaced Vs. Mass Practice . 71
Independent practice Few problems No “Going Over” in class
Essential Expectation #4: Balanced classroom discourse
Instruction that provides evidence of student demonstration of the CCSS-M Mathematical Practices
Common Core State Standards
Learning How Is Now Part of the Guaranteed and Viable Curriculum
MathematicalPractices
Eight standards K–12
MathematicalContent
About 35 standards per grade level K–8
About 55 Standards per grade 9-12
Understanding
Vision for Student
learning!
Common Core Standards for Mathematical Practice
Mathematical Practices1. Make sense of problems and persevere
in solving them.
2. Reason abstractly and quantitatively.
3. Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others.
4. Model with mathematics.
5. Use appropriate tools strategically.
6. Attend to precision.
7. Look for and make use of structure.
8. Look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning.
The Third Standard for Mathematical Practice
MP 3: Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others.
1. Students make conjectures.
2. Students justify their conclusions and communicate them to others.
3. Students compare the effectiveness of two plausible arguments.
4. Students listen and respond to the arguments of others for sense making and clarity.
There is no debate on the Instruction and Assessment vision for CCSS-M!
Evaluating the Evidence – John Hattie (2009 & 2012) Meta-analysis of over 800 studies…
Classroom Discourse .82
Whole Group = 35%
Small Group = 65%
34
The “Brand” of Your School or District in the Community resides in the implemented reality of your Vision for the school or program!
CCSS-M Implementation - Your voice of authority in your school or district
http://www.flickr.com/photos/roland_urbanek/4712188695/
Who is monitoring the adult behaviors for accountability and celebration of the CCSS-M behaviors?
Vision Implementation and Action
You understand that every adult in your school/district must be involved in the Accountability/ Celebration PLC culture…
The CCSS-M Vision becomes your voice of authority
Provide Accountability and Celebration of WHAT?
• Accountability/celebration of Student Results (Goals)
• Accountability/Celebration of Adult behaviors and Actions (Values)
• Your # 1 Job – monitor both of these with consequences
For your monitoring to become “Formative” it needs to:
1. Provide meaningful feedback
2. Result in action by the teachers or teacher team.
Meaningful Feedback Requires….
The goal is for you to provide formative feedback in your work:
1)Specific2) Timely3)Accurate 4)Fair Feedback
Action on your feedback is required
Meaningful feedback requires using…
The Genius ofAND
No “BUTS” allowedNo use of “THEY”
Lots of Hot Fudge Sundaes
A final thought on this…
You can become intentional about celebration in 2014-2015 (short and long term wins)
High Quality CCSS-M Implementation: The Grain size of Analysis What does our team do before the unit begins?
What does our team do during the unit?
What does our team do after the unit has finished?
Essential Expectation #5: Formative assessment processes after the unit ends
Ensuring a robust formative assessment process for students and adults—using the assessment instruments and tasks from each unit…
There is no debate on the Instruction and Assessment vision for CCSS-M!
Evaluating the Evidence – John Hattie (2009 & 2012) Meta-analysis of over 800 studies…
Assessment as a process of Formative Feedback .75
San Diego County Achievement Gap Task Force
BREAKOUT SESSIONS
Session 1:CCSS Mathematics Presents an Extraordinary Opportunity to
Move to Higher Levels of Achievement for All Students
Chula Vista Elementary School District
Room 6-D 54
San Diego County Achievement Gap Task Force
BREAKOUT SESSIONS
Session 2:Leading the Use of Performance Tasks in Mathematics to Improve Teaching and Promote Student
Learning
San Diego County Office of Education
Room 6-B 55
San Diego County Achievement Gap Task Force
BREAKOUT SESSIONS
Session 3:Changing the Mindset about
Mathematics Instruction: Envisioning Quantitative Literacy
San Marcos Unified School District
Room 6-E56
San Diego County Achievement Gap Task Force
BREAKOUT SESSIONS
Session 4:Looking at the Conditions Leaders
Control to Lead the Implementation of Common Core
MathematicsSan Diego, Oceanside, &
Vista Unified School Districts
Room 6-F57
San Diego County Achievement Gap Task Force
BREAKOUT SESSIONS
Session 5:The Intersection of School
Leadership and Common CoreCarlsbad Unified School
District Room 6-C
58
San Diego County Achievement Gap Task Force
Breakout Sessions- 70 minutes
Breakout SessionBegins 9:45
Be back and ready to begin at 11:00
San Diego County Achievement Gap Task Force
Debriefing Our Learning Superintendents
will lead the discussion or designate someone to do so
How will the learning from today impact the actions we take in our schools and districts?
San Diego County Achievement Gap Task Force
Possible Questions for Debriefing…
1. How could the information from Tim Kanold’s presentation influence our decision making around leading the implementation of the common core state standards?
2. What were your major “take-aways” from the breakout session and how could they influence what you do at your school/district?
3. How could the information from today’s learning help us improve systems that improve teaching and learning within our district?
4. How did the information from today support our district-wide study/focus for the year? What do we need to communicate back to our other leaders, teachers, parents and other stakeholders?
5. What information are you still seeking and how should we go about building our understanding in that area?