Top Banner
A SEMINAR ON DESIGN FOR MANUFACTURING ASSEMBLY PROCESS SUBMITTED BY D.SANTOSH KUMAR 14481D1506
25
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: SAMNTOSH KUMAR DIMMETA Product design

A SEMINAR ONDESIGN FOR MANUFACTURING

ASSEMBLY PROCESS

SUBMITTED BYD.SANTOSH KUMAR14481D1506

Page 2: SAMNTOSH KUMAR DIMMETA Product design

• Design for manufacturing (DFM) is design based on minimizing the cost of production and/or time to market for a product, while maintaining an appropriate level of quality. The strategy in DFM involves minimizing the number of parts in a product and selecting the appropriate manufacturing process.

Design for Manufacturing

Page 3: SAMNTOSH KUMAR DIMMETA Product design

DIFFERENCES:

Design for Assembly (DFA)

• concerned only with reducing product assembly cost– minimizes number of assembly operations

– individual parts tend to be more complex in design

Design for Manufacturing (DFM)

• concerned with reducing overall part production cost– minimizes complexity of manufacturing operations

– uses common datum features and primary axes

Page 4: SAMNTOSH KUMAR DIMMETA Product design

DESIGN FOR ASSEMBLY

“A PROCESS FOR IMPROVING PRODUCT DESIGN FOR EASY LOW-COST ASSEMBLY, FOCUSING ON FUNCTIONALITY AND ON ASSEMBLABLITY CONCURRENTLY.”

-VINCENT CHAN &FILIPPO.

Design of components taking into account how they will be assembled together to ensure that assembly costs are minimized.

DFA is the method of design of the product for ease of assembly

Page 5: SAMNTOSH KUMAR DIMMETA Product design

Manual

Most flexible & Most expensive

Skill of workers effects assembly times

Hard Automation

Custom tooling – only make one product

Soft Automation

Robots

Types of Assembly

Page 6: SAMNTOSH KUMAR DIMMETA Product design

Concept Design

Design for

Assembly

Design for

Manufacturing

Detailed Design

Optimize Design for

Part Count and

Assembly

Optimize Design for

Production Readiness

Sequence of Analysis

Page 7: SAMNTOSH KUMAR DIMMETA Product design

Product Information: functional requirements

Functional analysis

Identify parts that can be standardized

Determine part count efficiencies

Step 2

Step 1

Analyze data for new design

Step 3

Identify handling (grasp & orientation) opportunitiesStep 4

Identify insertion (locate & secure) opportunitiesStep 5

Step 6 Identify opportunities to reduce secondary operations

Identify quality (mistake proofing) opportunities

Benchmark when possible

Determine your practical part count

Step 7

DFA Process

Page 8: SAMNTOSH KUMAR DIMMETA Product design

1. Reduce number of parts

2. Reduce number of different parts - Standardize parts

3. Simplification of assembly

4. Reduction number of processes

5. Less fasteners especially screws & bolts

6. Design parts with self-locating features

7. Design parts with self-fastening features.

8. Minimize reorientation of parts during assembly

9. Ensure access & visibility

10. Easy part handling

11. Assemble from top

12. Reduce locating/alignment operations – manual/time consuming

DFA Guidelines

Page 9: SAMNTOSH KUMAR DIMMETA Product design

Proposed design of a motor drive assembly

REDUCE PARTS:

Page 10: SAMNTOSH KUMAR DIMMETA Product design

The following change could easily be made:

the powder metal bushings are unnecessary because the part can be machined from an alternative material with the right frictional characteristics, such as Nylon

The following are difficult to justify:

separate stand-offs

end plate

cover

the six screws

We started with this.

Page 11: SAMNTOSH KUMAR DIMMETA Product design

At the end of the changes due to DFMA are:

Page 12: SAMNTOSH KUMAR DIMMETA Product design

STANDARDIZED PARTS:

Page 13: SAMNTOSH KUMAR DIMMETA Product design

Easier = faster

Less opportunity for mistakes

Easier to automate

Simplification of assembly:

Page 14: SAMNTOSH KUMAR DIMMETA Product design

• Less steps = faster

• Less material handling = less damage

• Less operations = less opportunity for defects

Reducing Number of Processes

Page 15: SAMNTOSH KUMAR DIMMETA Product design

Less Fasteners especially screws & bolts

Left to right: simplest, low cost to most parts hardest to assembly

Page 16: SAMNTOSH KUMAR DIMMETA Product design

SELF LOCKING AND SELF-FASTENING

Page 17: SAMNTOSH KUMAR DIMMETA Product design

SELF LOCATING PARTS

Page 18: SAMNTOSH KUMAR DIMMETA Product design

Asymmetric Part Symmetry of a part

makes assembly easier

Symmetry eliminates reorientation

1. Critical orientation – obvious – see & fit

2. Non-critical orientation – fit in any direction

Page 19: SAMNTOSH KUMAR DIMMETA Product design

Rivet

Eliminate Secondary Operations

Screwing, drilling, twisting, riveting, bending Welding, soldering, gluing, Painting, lubricating

Page 20: SAMNTOSH KUMAR DIMMETA Product design

ENSURE ACCESS & VISIBILITY

Page 21: SAMNTOSH KUMAR DIMMETA Product design

Easy part handling

size slipperiness

sharpness flexibility

Size WeightShapeSharp edgesStickyTangled & Nested

Page 22: SAMNTOSH KUMAR DIMMETA Product design

Eliminate Tangling/Nesting

Page 23: SAMNTOSH KUMAR DIMMETA Product design

Assemble from Top

Insertion from the top is preferred.

Page 24: SAMNTOSH KUMAR DIMMETA Product design

Reduce locating/alignment operations –manual/time consuming

Page 25: SAMNTOSH KUMAR DIMMETA Product design

Any Queries