OX 1';!U)SO """,leigh 7 The One Click Group DO t 02380857124 T: tl23 6000 8000 f: 023 6048 0581 E: ;:ieine,[email protected],C<:l.Uk W\'IJ'.Y.bllaw.cQ,UK BY EMAIL ONLY NOT FOR PUBLICATION OucRe<; L23IELMH 26 February 2009 Dear Sirs Ml ' Sill Welsh - Complaint t o th e GMC and Essay by Martin J1 Wa!iKer We act on behalf of Professor David Salisbury CB, Director of Immunisation at the Department of Health. We are aware that last year Mr Bill Welsh in his capacity as ihe President of the Autism Treatment Trust in Edinburgh submitted a complaint against ou r client to the Generaj Medicai Council ("GMC") on fitness to practice an d professional conduct matters. It has come to our cilent's attenti on that this complaint ha s no w been published on the OneClicl<Group.co.uk website at the following URL: h t t p : / / w w w . t h e o n e c U c k g r o u P . c o . u k l n e w s . p h p ? s t a r t = 2 5 2 0 & e n d = 2 5 i J . O & i f l e w = : l ~ & i d = 3 1 3 9 # n e . . w s p o s t The publication o f complaint to the GlVIC Yow' website di d no t as k for an y comment from ou r client before the complaint. Therefore our client was not given the opportunity to address his well founded concern about the publication of the details o f a complaint made to the GMC. As a matier of good practice this complaint should not have been published on the internet prior to n: being considered by th e GMC. Th e complaint is made against 12 Doctors but it names our client ''''''' .. ''',. ... the body of the complaint The complaInt contains false and defamatory allegations against our we identify below. We ar e also advised that the GM C is oo t intending to investigate the complaint an d has ciosed their file. Fo r these reasons We require you to remove the complaint from your website immediately. Defamatory statements Allegations in the complaint made against ou r client suggest that ou r client ha s ignored evidence; relled on spin and u n . $ U b s t a n t i a ~ e d data to support his view on the MMR vaccine; acted unethically and recklessly; deliberately Ignored evidence; acted as an accessory to a criminal act; lacks sound jUdgment; and that he has no t acted in the best interests of children. These allegations ar e no t only incorrect and faise, bu t setiously defamatory of ou r client They also seek to undermine ou r cllent In his profeSSional capacity as the Director of Immunisation at the Departmentof Health.
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
8/14/2019 Salisbury Solicitor Letter
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/salisbury-solicitor-letter 1/4
OX 1';!U)SO """,leigh 7
The One Click Group DO t 02380857124
T: tl23 6000 8000
f: 023 6048 0581
E: ;:ieine,[email protected],C<:l.Uk
W\'IJ'.Y.bllaw.cQ,UKBY EMAIL ONLY
NOT FOR PUBLICATION OucRe<; L23IELMH
26 February 2009
Dear Sirs
Ml ' Sill Welsh - Complaint to th e GMC and Essay by Martin J1 Wa!iKer
We act on behalf of Professor David Salisbury CB, Director of Immunisation at the Department of Health.
We are aware that last year Mr Bill Welsh in his capacity as ihe President of the Autism Treatment Trust inEdinburgh submitted a complaint against our client to the Generaj Medicai Council ("GMC") on fitness to
practice and professional conduct matters.
It has come to our cilent's attention that this complaint has now been published on the OneClicl<Group.co.ukwebsite at the following URL:h t t p : / / w w w . t h e o n e c U c k g r o u P . c o . u k l n e w s . p h p ? s t a r t = 2 5 2 0 & e n d = 2 5 i J . O & i f l e w = : l ~ & i d = 3 1 3 9 # n e . . w s p o s t
The publication of a complaint to the GlVIC
Yow' websitedid
no t as k for any comment from our client before the complaint. Therefore our clientwas not given the opportunity to address his well founded concern about the publication of the details of acomplaint made to the GMC.
As a matier of good practice this complaint should not have been published on the internet prior to n: beingconsidered by the GMC.
The complaint is made against 12 Doctors but it names our client '''''''..''',.... the body of the complaint ThecomplaInt contains false and defamatory allegations against our we identify below.
We are also advised that the GMC is oo t intending to investigate the complaint and has ciosed their file.
For these reasons We require you to remove the complaint from your website immediately.
Defamatory statements
Allegations in the complaint made against our client suggest that our client has ignored evidence; relled on
spin and u n . $ U b s t a n t i a ~ e d data to support his view on the MMR vaccine; acted unethically and recklessly;deliberately Ignored evidence; acted as an accessory to a criminal act; lacks sound jUdgment; and that he hasnot acted in the best interests of children. These allegations are not only incorrect and faise, but setiously
defamatory of our client They also seek to undermine our cllent In his profeSSional capacity as the Director ofImmunisation at the Departmentof Health.
8/14/2019 Salisbury Solicitor Letter
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/salisbury-solicitor-letter 2/4
8/14/2019 Salisbury Solicitor Letter
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/salisbury-solicitor-letter 3/4
8/14/2019 Salisbury Solicitor Letter
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/salisbury-solicitor-letter 4/4
Related Documents
![Solicitor Firm Agreement - Sutter Health · Solicitor Firm Agreement [For Solicitor Firms Receiving Commission Compensation] ... 1. Appointment of Solicitor Firm. SHP appoints Solicitor](https://static.cupdf.com/doc/110x72/5e03c1759ffc96763318b0b7/solicitor-firm-agreement-sutter-health-solicitor-firm-agreement-for-solicitor.jpg)
